N-terminal Pro-brain Natriuretic Peptide Testing Research Articles

N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide is associated with pulmonary hypertension or diastolic dysfunction in patients with systemic sclerosis: An Australian prospective cross-sectional study

Introduction: Pulmonary arterial hypertension and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction are associated with significant morbidity and mortality in systemic sclerosis. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide has been proposed as part of composite screening algorithms for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Our aim was to assess the prevalence of pulmonary hypertension and diastolic dysfunction, and evaluate their association with serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in systemic sclerosis patients. Methods: Patients with systemic sclerosis were prospectively enrolled to undergo N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide testing and transthoracic echocardiography at a tertiary Australian centre from January to October 2022. We collected demographic and transthoracic echocardiography variables including pulmonary hypertension estimated by tricuspid regurgitant velocity and diastolic dysfunction assessed by the ASE/EACVI 2016 guidelines. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to evaluate association between N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and echocardiographic parameters. Results: Sixty-one patients were enrolled (median age = 62 years (interquartile range = 55–69 years); 84% female). Two-thirds of patients had limited systemic sclerosis (40/61). Five patients (8%) had high likelihood of pulmonary hypertension by transthoracic echocardiography. Seven patients (11%) had diastolic dysfunction; however, seven patients (11%) had indeterminate diastology. Six patients underwent right heart catheterisation, with five patients diagnosed with pulmonary hypertension. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in patients with pulmonary hypertension or diastolic dysfunction was significantly higher (median = 207 and 226 pg/mL, respectively) compared to patients without either condition (median = 69 pg/mL, p = 0.01). N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide showed a statistically significant although limited correlation with estimated pulmonary pressures measured by tricuspid regurgitant velocity (r = 0.44, p = 0.002) and left ventricular filling pressures (r = 0.27, p = 0.04). Conclusion: Pulmonary hypertension and diastolic dysfunction are both observed in systemic sclerosis. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide is associated with both conditions; however, it cannot distinguish between the two disease processes. Right heart catheterisation may be required to make this distinction.

Optimization of Evidence-Based Heart Failure Medications After an Acute Heart Failure Admission

The Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Rapid Optimization, Helped by N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide Testing of Heart Failure Therapies (STRONG-HF) trial strived for rapid uptitration aiming to reach 100% optimal doses of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) within 2 weeks after discharge from an acute heart failure (AHF) admission. To assess the association between degree of GDMT doses achieved in high-intensity care and outcomes. This was a post hoc secondary analysis of the STRONG-HF randomized clinical trial, conducted from May 2018 to September 2022. Included in the study were patients with AHF who were not treated with optimal doses of GDMT before and after discharge from an AHF admission. Data were analyzed from January to October 2023. The mean percentage of the doses of 3 classes of HF medications (renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, β-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists) relative to their optimal doses was computed. Patients were classified into 3 dose categories: low (<50%), medium (≥50% to <90%), and high (≥90%). Dose and dose group were included as a time-dependent covariate in Cox regression models, which were used to test whether outcomes differed by dose. Post hoc secondary analyses of postdischarge 180-day HF readmission or death and 90-day change in quality of life. A total of 515 patients (mean [SD] age, 62.7 [13.4] years; 311 male [60.4%]) assigned high-intensity care were included in this analysis. At 2 weeks, 39 patients (7.6%) achieved low doses, 254 patients (49.3%) achieved medium doses, and 222 patients (43.1%) achieved high doses. Patients with lower blood pressure and more congestion were less likely to be uptitrated to optimal GDMT doses at week 2. As a continuous time-dependent covariate, an increase of 10% in the average percentage optimal dose was associated with a reduction in 180-day HF readmission or all-cause death (primary end point: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81-0.98; P = .01) and a decrease in 180-day all-cause mortality (aHR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.73-0.95; P = .007). Quality of life at 90 days, measured by the EQ-5D visual analog scale, improved more in patients treated with higher doses of GDMT (mean difference, 0.10; 95% CI, -4.88 to 5.07 and 3.13; 95% CI, -1.98 to 8.24 points in the medium- and high-dose groups relative to the low-dose group, respectively; P = .07). Adverse events to day 90 occurred less frequently in participants with HIC who were prescribed higher GDMT doses at week 2. Results of this post hoc analysis of the STRONG-HF randomized clinical trial show that, among patients randomly assigned to high-intensity care, achieving higher doses of HF GDMT 2 weeks after discharge was feasible and safe in most patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03412201.

Variations in NT-proBNP Levels in Pregnant Patients with and without SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Consequences for the Newborns.

NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide) has a high negative predictive value for ruling out heart failure, a disorder linked with volume overload of the ventricles, and is used for diagnosis, prognosis, and risk stratification. Pregnancy causes in healthy women changes in physical and hemodynamic parameters and appears to be a risk factor for severe COVID-19 illness. The purpose of this study is to highlight the significance of monitoring NT-proBNP levels during pregnancy, particularly in patients who were infected with COVID-19 during pregnancy or were infected with the virus while giving birth. The findings of this comparative research indicate the importance of NT-proBNP in terms of foetal prognosis and birthweight. We collected blood samples to measure NT-proBNP concentrations from a cohort of 186 pregnant patients divided into two groups based on the presence of SARS-CoV-2 viral infection. Elevated NT-proBNP had an unfavourable implication on the newborn birth weight and Apgar score and expressed its influence on lower values. We consider that NT-proBNP testing in pregnant patients, especially those with COVID-19 infection, can be relevant and be used as a predictive marker to be taken into consideration when it comes to management, outcome, and treatment regarding pregnant patients and their newborns.

A-006 Evaluation of the ADVIA Centaur NT-proBNPII Assay Vs Standard-of-care Natriuretic Peptide Testing in the Emergency Department

Abstract Background The Siemens Healthineers ADVIA Centaur® NT-proBNPII (PBNPII) assay* was developed for in vitro diagnostic use in the quantitative determination of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in human serum and plasma (EDTA and lithium heparin) using the ADVIA Centaur XP Immunoassay System. Siemens Healthineers performed a clinical study to evaluate the ADVIA Centaur XP PBNPII assay in an Emergency Department (ED) patient population. The study also involved collection of standard-of-care (SOC) natriuretic peptide (NP) results, either NT-proBNP or BNP. Objective To compare results from the ADVIA Centaur PBNPII assay in ED populations with SOC NP results and adjudicated diagnosis of heart failure. Methods 3128 subjects were enrolled from 30 ED sites. Blood was collected at time of enrollment for subsequent ADVIA Centaur PBNPII measurement; results from SOC NP testing were obtained from chart review. Available SOC testing was performed within 24 h of enrollment draw for all except four patients. Adjudication of acute HF (de novo or worsening) or non-acute HF was determined by an independent central adjudication panel of expert clinicians. Results Of the 3128 patients in the ED study, 1646 (52.6%) had an SOC BNP test performed, 1020 (32.6%) had an SOC NT-proBNP test performed, and 462 (14.8%) had neither. Agreement between the SOC NP results and PBNPII results was assessed based on concordance using cutoffs described in heart failure guidelines that include an indeterminate zone (1). For those tested with SOC NT-proBNP, there was 94.7% concordance, 5% partial concordance (indeterminate by one assay and positive or negative by the other), and 0.3% discordance. For those tested with SOC BNP, there was 73.8% concordance, 25.5% partial concordance, and 0.7% discordance. Agreement with adjudication was virtually identical for both the PBNPII assay and SOC PBNP at 63% concordance, 17% partial concordance, and 20% discordance. For those tested with SOC BNP, there was 63% concordance, 29.5% partial concordance, and 7.5% discordance, while in this same population the PBNPII assay had 67.8% concordance, 15.7% partial concordance, and 16.5% discordance. Conclusion Upon comparison of ADVIA Centaur PBNPII assay results to SOC NP testing in an ED population, Siemens Healthineers concludes that the ADVIA Centaur PBNPII assay performs similarly to commercial natriuretic peptide assays in routine use. These results agree with publications comparing diagnostic testing of NT-proBNP and BNP for suspected heart failure (2). *Disclaimer The products/features mentioned herein are not commercially available in all countries. Their future availability cannot be guaranteed.

Predictive value of a nomogram model for adverse outcomes in very low birth weight infants with patent ductus arteriosus: A prospective study.

To establish a nomogram model incorporating markers of echocardiography and N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) for predicting adverse outcomes of patent ductus arteriosus (PDAao) in very low birth weight infants and to evaluate the predictive values of the model. A prospective study was conducted for very low birth weight infants who were admitted from May 2019 to September 2020. An echocardiogram and blood NT-proBNP test were carried out in the first 48 h after birth, and the arterial duct remained open in all patients. Other data collected included clinical symptoms and infant characteristics. A nomogram model was established to predict the risk of PDAao (including severe BPD, IVH, NEC or death). Internal verifications were performed for the nomogram, and the discrimination and calibration of the model were evaluated by the C-index and calibration curve. Eighty-two infants were enrolled and divided into an adverse outcome (AO) group and normal outcome (NO) group with 41 patients in each group. PDA diameter, PDA maximum flow velocity, left atrium diameter/aortic diameter (LA/AO) ratio and NT-proBNP level were independent risk factors for PDAao and were included in the nomogram model. The model presented good discrimination with a C-index of 0.917 (95% CI 0.859-0.975). The calibration curves in showed high consistency and indicated good Correspondence: between the event incidence predicted by the nomogram model and the true incidence of PDAao. The nomogram model incorporating the PDA diameter, PDA maximum flow velocity, LA/AO ratio and NT-proBNP level in the first 48 h could early predict the later occurrence of PDAao in very low birth weight infants.

Risk Assessment of Adverse Outcomes in Symptomatic Patients With Arterial Hypertension and Chronic Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Using THE HFA-PEFF Algorithm

Aim To study the incidence of heart failure (HF) in patients with arterial hypertension (AH), symptoms of HF, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF) ≥50 % using a novel, modified HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm and to evaluate the liver hydration status and density depending on the established HF profiles and the prognostic significance of this algorithm.Material and methods This study included 180 patients (median age, 72 years) with AH, symptoms of HF, and LV EF ≥50 %. The incidence of chronic HF with preserved ejection fraction (CHFpEF) was studied with the stepwise, modified HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm, and long-term outcomes were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up. The hydration status was determined by a bioimpedance vector analysis, and the liver density was measured by indirect fibroelastometry. The following tests were performed for all patients: standard, general clinical and laboratory examination with evaluation of CH symptoms (including N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide test); extended echocardiography with assessment of structural and functional parameters of the heart; a KCCQ questionnaire was used for evaluation of patients' condition and quality of life (QoL). Long-term outcomes were studied by phone calls at 3, 6, and 12 months following discharge from the hospital/visit (worsened QoL, repeated hospitalization for cardiovascular causes, cardiovascular death or all-cause death).Results The following profiles were determined by the HFA-PEFF algorithm: with CHFpEF, with intermediate probability of HF, and without HF (58.9, 31.1, and 10 %, respectively). The study showed that patients with CHFpEF compared to patients of the intermediate group and without HF, had higher levels of brain natriuretic peptide, more pronounced signs of congestion according to results of the bioimpedance vector analysis and a higher liver density according to results of indirect fibroelastometry of the liver, which allowed identification of a group of patients with a high probability of CHFpEF. The diagnosis of HF by HFA-PEFF had an adverse prognostic significance with respect of worsened QoL according to the KCCQ questionnaire, and of repeated admission for HF during a year.Conclusion In AH patients with symptoms of HF and LV EF ≥50 %, CHFpEF was detected with the HFA-PEFF algorithm in 58.9 % of cases. Patients with AH and verified CHFpEF had a high incidence of hyperhydration and increased liver density. A diagnosis of CHFpEF by the HFA-PEFF algorithm had an adverse prognostic significance with respect of long-term outcomes.

N-Terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) in patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma: report from a single institution.

Elevated levels of serum cardiovascular markers including natriuretic peptides (NPs) such as amino terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) have been associated with disease severity and survival in cancer patients and more recently in multiple myeloma (MM). In the present study, we retrospectively reviewed 87 consecutive symptomatic TEMM (transplant-eligible) and 126 TIMM (transplant-ineligible) patients treated at our institution that did undergo NTproBNP testing from 2017 to 2020. Median age at diagnosis was 59.3years and 75.4years for the TEMM and TIMM groups, respectively (p = 0.0001). NTproBNP ≥ 300ng/L was used to assess survival outcomes in the group of symptomatic MM. Patients with AL amyloidosis and symptomatic MM were excluded from the study. Median OS for patients with NTproBNP ≥ 300ng/L was shorter (45.9months) as compared to those with NTproBNP of < 300ng/L (non-reached) (p = 0.0001). In addition, OS was shorter for those with CCI > 2, ISS2-3, and high-risk cytogenetics by FISH and ≥ 70years of age. Multivariate analysis showed that HR cytogenetics and ISS2-3 were independent predictors for OS in the entire cohort of MM patients. When restricted to TIMM, age ≥ 80years and NTproBNP ≥ 800ng/L were predictors for OS in univariate and multivariate analyses. In conclusion, NTproBNP appears to be an independent predictor factor for OS in symptomatic TIMM patients. The use of NTproBNP as a frailty marker remains to be elucidated. However, NTproBNP could potentially be used to guide treatment decisions aimed to minimize cardiovascular and renal toxicity for myeloma therapies that potentially do have cardio-renal implications.

NT-proBNP test with improved accuracy for the diagnosis of chronic heart failure.

The circulating concentration of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) has been shown to be a diagnostic tool for the detection of heart failure. Several factors influence NT-proBNP levels including age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). Therefore, the diagnostic sensitivity of NT-proBNP level for heart failure is relatively higher, but its specificity is low. This study aims to improve the diagnostic accuracy rate of this test by including multiple variables in the diagnostic test.The suspected chronic heart failure outpatients were divided into heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, and normal heart function groups. Area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve, cut-off value, and logistic regression analysis were used to select the model variables, sensitivity and specificity.In all, 436 subjects enrolled into this study were divided in 2 groups: model establishment (n = 300) and model validation (n = 136). In the model establishment group, the area under the curve (AUC) and cut-off value of NT-proBNP was 0.926 and 257.4 pg/mL, respectively. When age, glomerular filtration rate, BMI, atrial fibrillation, and sex were entered into the diagnosis model, AUC, sensitivity, and specificity further increased to 0.955 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.934, 0.976), 94.2% (from 93.0%), and 86.7% (from 74.2%). The ROC curve of corrected NT-proBNP diagnostic formula for heart failure was also significantly higher (P = .037).The corrected NT-proBNP diagnostic formula was found to improve the diagnostic accuracy of chronic heart failure.

Efficacy and Safety of Outpatient Treatment Based on the Hestia Clinical Decision Rule with or without N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide Testing in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism. A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Outpatient treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE) may lead to improved patient satisfaction and reduced healthcare costs. However, trials to assess its safety and the optimal method for patient selection are scarce. To validate the utility and safety of selecting patients with PE for outpatient treatment by the Hestia criteria and to compare the safety of the Hestia criteria alone with the Hestia criteria combined with N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) testing. We performed a randomized noninferiority trial in 17 Dutch hospitals. We randomized patients with PE without any of the Hestia criteria to direct discharge or additional NT-proBNP testing. We discharged the latter patients as well if NT-proBNP did not exceed 500 ng/L or admitted them if NT-proBNP was greater than 500 ng/L. The primary endpoint was 30-day adverse outcome defined as PE- or bleeding-related mortality, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or intensive care unit admission. The noninferiority margin for the primary endpoint was 3.4%. We randomized 550 patients. In the NT-proBNP group, 34 of 275 (12%) had elevated NT-proBNP values and were managed as inpatients. No patient (0 of 34) with an elevated NT-proBNP level treated in hospital (0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0-10.2%), versus no patient (0 of 23) with a post hoc-determined elevated NT-proBNP level from the direct discharge group (0%; 95% CI, 0-14.8%), experienced the primary endpoint. In both trial cohorts, the primary endpoint occurred in none of the 275 patients (0%; 95% CI, 0-1.3%) subjected to NT-proBNP testing, versus in 3 of 275 patients (1.1%; 95% CI, 0.2-3.2%) in the direct discharge group (P = 0.25). During the 3-month follow-up, recurrent venous thromboembolism occurred in two patients (0.73%; 95% CI, 0.1-2.6%) in the NT-proBNP group versus three patients (1.1%; 95% CI, 0.2-3.2%) in the direct discharge group (P = 0.65). Outpatient treatment of patients with PE selected on the basis of the Hestia criteria alone was associated with a low risk of adverse events. Given the low number of patients with elevated NT-proBNP levels, this trial was unable to draw definite conclusions regarding the incremental value of NT-proBNP testing in patients who fulfill the Hestia criteria. Clinical trial registered with www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=2603 (NTR2603).

N‐terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide in the management of patients in the medical emergency department (PROMPT): correlation with disease severity, utilization of hospital resources, and prognosis in a large, prospective, randomized multicentre trial

N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is a potent marker of heart failure and other cardiac diseases. The value of NT-proBNP testing in the medical emergency department (ED) was assessed in patients >65 years old. This large, prospective, randomized, controlled, multicentre trial was conducted in six medical EDs. Data for evaluation of the primary endpoint of hospitalization were available for 1086 patients. Median NT-proBNP was 582 pg/mL. A total of 16% of patients presented with NT-proBNP <150 pg/mL (low), 55% with NT-proBNP between 150 and 1800 pg/mL (intermediate), and 29% with NT-proBNP >1800 pg/mL (high). NT-proBNP was positively correlated with hospital admission [ odds ratio (OR) for high vs. low 2.9, P < 0.0001], length of stay (8.5 days vs. 3.5 days for high vs. low, P < 0.01), in-hospital death (3.9% vs. 0% for high vs. low, P < 0.01), 6 months re-hospitalization (OR for high vs. low 5.1, P < 0.0001), and 6 months death or re-hospitalization (OR for high vs. low 5.7, P < 0.0001). Knowledge of NT-proBNP had no significant effect on the primary endpoint hospital admission and the secondary endpoints intermediate/intensive care unit (IMC/ICU) admission, length of stay, re-hospitalization and death, or re-hospitalization in the total cohort. However, patients with high open NT-proBNP (>1800 pg/mL) were more likely to be admitted to the hospital (P < 0.05) and IMC/ICU (P < 0.05), whereas patients with low open NT-proBNP (<150 pg/mL) were less likely to be admitted (P < 0.05) compared with patients with blinded NT-proBNP. Although NT-proBNP does not affect overall hospitalization, it is associated with better stratification of patient care and is strongly correlated with subsequent utilization of hospital resources and prognosis.

N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide

Natriuretic peptides are controregulatory hormones associated with cardiac remodeling, namely, left ventricular hypertrophy and systolic/diastolic dysfunction. We intended to address the prognostic value of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in hypertension. We prospectively studied the relationship between plasma NT-proBNP and all-cause mortality in 684 hypertensive patients with no history or symptoms of heart failure referred for hypertension workup in our institution from 1998 to 2008. After a mean duration of 5.7 years, we observed 40 deaths (1.04 deaths per 100 patients per year). After adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors, including ambulatory blood pressure and serum creatinine, the risk for all-cause mortality more than doubled with each increment of 1 log NT-proBNP (hazard ratio: 2.33 [95% CI: 1.36 to 3.96]). The risk of death of patients with plasma NT-proBNP≥133 pg/mL (third tertile of the distribution) was 3.3 times that of patients with values<50.8 pg/mL (first tertile; hazard ratio: 3.30 [95% CI: 0.90 to 12.29]). This predictive value was independent of, and superior to, that of 2 ECG indexes of left ventricular hypertrophy, the Sokolov-Lyon index and the amplitude of the R wave in lead aVL. In addition, it persisted in patients without ECG left ventricular hypertrophy, which allowed refining risk stratification in this relatively low-risk patient category. In this large sample of hypertensive patients, plasma NT-proBNP appeared as a strong prognostic marker. This performance, together with the ease of measurement, low cost, and widespread availability of NT-proBNP test kits, should prompt a wide use of this marker for risk stratification in hypertension.

Combination of lung ultrasound (a comet-tail sign) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in differentiating acute heart failure from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma as cause of acute dyspnea in prehospital emergency setting

IntroductionWe studied the diagnostic accuracy of bedside lung ultrasound (the presence of a comet-tail sign), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and clinical assessment (according to the modified Boston criteria) in differentiating heart failure (HF)-related acute dyspnea from pulmonary (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)/asthma)-related acute dyspnea in the prehospital setting.MethodsOur prospective study was performed at the Center for Emergency Medicine, Maribor, Slovenia, between July 2007 and April 2010. Two groups of patients were compared: a HF-related acute dyspnea group (n = 129) and a pulmonary (asthma/COPD)-related acute dyspnea group (n = 89). All patients underwent lung ultrasound examinations, along with basic laboratory testing, rapid NT-proBNP testing and chest X-rays.ResultsThe ultrasound comet-tail sign has 100% sensitivity, 95% specificity, 100% negative predictive value (NPV) and 96% positive predictive value (PPV) for the diagnosis of HF. NT-proBNP (cutoff point 1,000 pg/mL) has 92% sensitivity, 89% specificity, 86% NPV and 90% PPV. The Boston modified criteria have 85% sensitivity, 86% specificity, 80% NPV and 90% PPV. In comparing the three methods, we found significant differences between ultrasound sign and (1) NT-proBNP (P < 0.05) and (2) Boston modified criteria (P < 0.05). The combination of ultrasound sign and NT-proBNP has 100% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% NPV and 100% PPV. With the use of ultrasound, we can exclude HF in patients with pulmonary-related dyspnea who have positive NT-proBNP (> 1,000 pg/mL) and a history of HF.ConclusionsAn ultrasound comet-tail sign alone or in combination with NT-proBNP has high diagnostic accuracy in differentiating acute HF-related from COPD/asthma-related causes of acute dyspnea in the prehospital emergency setting.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01235182.

N-terminal pro–brain natriuretic peptide testing in the emergency department: Beneficial effects on hospitalization, costs, and outcome

N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is an established biomarker for heart failure. Assessment of this biomarker in patients with acute dyspnea presenting to the emergency department (ED) may aid diagnostic decision-making, resulting in improved patient care and reduced costs. In a prospective clinical trial, patients presenting with acute dyspnea to the ED of the Erasmus Medical College, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, were randomized for either rapid measurement or no measurement of NT-proBNP. For ruling out heart failure, cutoff values of 93 pg/mL in male and 144 pg/mL in female patients were used, and for ruling in heart failure, a cutoff value of 1,017 pg/mL was used. Time to discharge from the hospital and costs related to hospital admission were primary end points. Bootstrap analysis was used for comparison of costs and 30-day mortality between the NT-proBNP and control group. A total of 477 patients (54% male) was enrolled. The mean age was 59 years, with 44% of patients having a history of cardiac disease. Median time to discharge from the hospital was 1.9 days (interquartile range [IQR], 0.12-8.4 days) in the NT-proBNP group (n = 241) compared with 3.9 days (IQR, 0.16-11.0 days) in the control group (n = 236) (P = .04). Introduction of NT-proBNP testing resulted in a trend toward reduction in costs related to hospital admission and diagnostic investigations of $1,364 per patient (95% CI $-246 to $3,215), whereas 30-day mortality was similar (15 patients in the NT-proBNP and 18 patients in the control group). Introduction of NT-proBNP testing for heart failure in the ED setting reduces the time to discharge and is associated with a trend toward cost reduction.

N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide – a promising biomarker for the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive women

No agreement has been reached regarding the best strategy to detect left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). This study examined the role of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in the diagnosis of LVH in hypertensive patients and the potential factors that may influence its diagnostic performance. The global accuracy of NT-proBNP in diagnosing LVH was assessed using a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The influence of patients' characteristics on test accuracy was studied with a ROC regression based on a probit model. Ninety-three subjects were included. All had NT-proBNP measured and underwent electrocardiography and echocardiography, with calculation of the left ventricular mass index (LVMI). The diagnostic performance of NT-proBNP in LVH varied slightly depending on the indexation mode of LVMI. In cases of body surface area indexation, the area under the ROC curve of 81.6% suggested a good performance. The accuracy of the marker was significantly higher in women than in men (p<0.0001). There were no significant effects of age, treatment, body mass index, left ventricular mass index, 24-h systolic blood pressure, or creatinine clearance on the test performance. Slight differences were observed when an indexation to height(2.7) instead of body surface area was used. The present results may lead to a new strategy for risk stratification in hypertension: in women, NT-proBNP alone or preferably in combination with electrocardiography seems sufficient to confirm or exclude diagnosis of LVH. In men, echocardiography would only be needed in cases of negative electrocardiography and NT-proBNP test.

Serum measurement of N-terminal pro-brain peptide among septic patients

Elevated serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels occur in severe sepsis or septic shock. Studies on the value of NT-proBNP testing among septic patients revealed conflicting results. The aim of the study was to investigate NT-proBNP among septic patients admitted to the ICU.

The Impact of Amino-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide Testing on Hospital Length of Stay and Morbidity in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

In clinical trials, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) testing has been shown to be valuable for diagnosis and triage of patients with acute decompensated heart failure. It is not yet clear what benefits might be expected from the initiation of NT-proBNP testing in an everyday clinical setting. To determine the effects of NT-proBNP testing on hospital length of stay as well as on 60-day morbidity and mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure before and after the test was implemented in the clinical laboratory. We measured hospital length of stay and 60-day morbidity and mortality rates among patients with acute decompensated heart failure admitted before and after initiation of NT-proBNP testing in our hospital. Differences in demographics between preimplementation and postimplementation groups were compared with the chi2 test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables. Comparison between the hospital length of stay for each group was evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test. Differences in rates of rehospitalization or death at 60 days following presentation were assessed using chi2 cross-tabulation. Patients in the postimplementation group had similar clinical features as those in the preimplementation group. The hospital length of stay for patients in the postimplementation study group decreased both with respect to mean (1.86-day reduction) and median (1.3-day reduction) hospital stay (both, P = .03). Additionally, significantly lower rates of death (6.6% absolute risk reduction, P = .01), rehospitalization (12.1% absolute risk reduction, P = .005), and the composite of the 2 rates (18.7% absolute risk reduction, P = .008) were found following initiation of NT-proBNP testing. Implementation of NT-proBNP testing may result in significant reductions in hospital length of stay as well as improvements in rates of morbidity and mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.

Multicentre evaluation of a new point-of-care test for the determination of NT-proBNP in whole blood

The Roche CARDIAC proBNP point-of-care (POC) test is the first test intended for the quantitative determination of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in whole blood as an aid in the diagnosis of suspected congestive heart failure, in the monitoring of patients with compensated left-ventricular dysfunction and in the risk stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes. A multicentre evaluation was carried out to assess the analytical performance of the POC NT-proBNP test at seven different sites. The majority of all coefficients of variation (CVs) obtained for within-series imprecision using native blood samples was below 10% for both 52 samples measured ten times and for 674 samples measured in duplicate. Using quality control material, the majority of CV values for day-to-day imprecision were below 14% for the low control level and below 13% for the high control level. In method comparisons for four lots of the POC NT-proBNP test with the laboratory reference method (Elecsys proBNP), the slope ranged from 0.93 to 1.10 and the intercept ranged from 1.8 to 6.9. The bias found between venous and arterial blood with the POC NT-proBNP method was < or =5%. All four lots of the POC NT-proBNP test investigated showed excellent agreement, with mean differences of between -5% and +4%. No significant interference was observed with lipaemic blood (triglyceride concentrations up to 6.3 mmol/L), icteric blood (bilirubin concentrations up to 582 micromol/L), haemolytic blood (haemoglobin concentrations up to 62 mg/L), biotin (up to 10 mg/L), rheumatoid factor (up to 42 IU/mL), or with 50 out of 52 standard or cardiological drugs in therapeutic concentrations. With bisoprolol and BNP, somewhat higher bias in the low NT-proBNP concentration range (<175 ng/L) was found. Haematocrit values between 28% and 58% had no influence on the test result. Interference may be caused by human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) types 1 and 2. No significant influence on the results with POC NT-proBNP was found using volumes of 140-165 muL. High NT-proBNP concentrations above the measuring range of the POC NT-proBNP test did not lead to false low results due to a potential high-dose hook effect. The POC NT-proBNP test showed good analytical performance and excellent agreement with the laboratory method. The POC NT-proBNP assay is therefore suitable in the POC setting.

A Clinical and Biochemical Critical Pathway for the Evaluation of Patients With Suspected Acute Congestive Heart Failure

Dyspnea is a primary clinical manifestation of acute congestive heart failure (CHF) among patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Unfortunately, other critical illnesses, including acute coronary syndromes, pulmonary embolism, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and pneumonia, may present with clinical symptoms and signs similar to acute CHF. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) has proven to be a powerful tool in the diagnostic assessment of dyspnea as a result of its ability to confirm or exclude the presence of acute CHF. However, many of the disorders that mimic acute CHF may result in elevated NT-proBNP levels as well. Results from the ProBNP Investigation of Dyspnea in the Emergency Department (PRIDE) study recently demonstrated that a strategy integrating NT-proBNP testing into routine clinical assessment demonstrated a better diagnostic yield than each strategy used in isolation. We present a diagnostic algorithm integrating NT-proBNP testing with clinical assessment for use in routine clinical practice.