Saha et al. deserve appreciation for addressing the enigmatic issue of tumor pharmacogenetics in thyroid cancer, through the interesting case, “NRAS mutation in differentiated thyroid cancer,” published in the Molecular Tumor Board section of the previous issue of the journal.[1] They have nicely narrated the chronological events in the natural history, response to biological therapy, and related genetics in a patient with papillary thyroid carcinoma. We have few pertinent comments and queries. First, NRAS mutation is the most common mutation reported in follicular adenomas, follicular thyroid cancer, and the follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancer, among the RAS gene (H, N, K) family.[2] Second, the genetic mechanisms of thyroid cancer cell biology are complex including genetic, epigenetic, sequential, evolving, and superadded mutations leading to clonal evolution. Third, the expanding genetic database, especially after next-generation sequencing studies, has shifted the clinical paradigm to predicting the natural history, tumor biology, response to radioidodine therapy, and response to biological therapy based on these molecular footprints.[3] Fourth, the ultimate aim of predicting prognosis, response of residual disease, response of metastasis, and influence of biological therapy on re-differentiation are the latest areas of active research in cancer tumor science. Fifth, the dramatic regression of progressive, refractory metastatic recurrences as reported in this case, is a very rare and interesting phenomenon. Such a favorable response in thyroid cancer has been reported in the past, but the biological reason is speculative.[4] It has been shown that suppression of oncogenic NRAS has induced apoptosis in human melanoma cell lines.[5] Sixth, thyroid cancer genetics are not static, but dynamically evolving, as shown in the sequential genetic mechanisms influencing the adenoma-carcinoma sequence, de-differentiation of papillary thyroid cancer to anaplastic thyroid cancer, and re-differentiation of thyroid cancer tissues.[2] Lastly, a single universal gene panel including common genes associated with thyroid cancer such as RAS, BRAF, and RET/PTC rearrangements for routine clinical use, is the need of the hour. Such a panel, for prognosticating and treating papillary thyroid cancer, is an ambitious target for future thyroid cancer management. The present paper would have been enhanced by a pathophysiological explanation of the role of NRAS pharmacogenetics in papillary thyroid cancer. A paragraph on the plausible reasons for the good response to downstream biological therapies targeting MEK, ERK, mTOR, and P13K genes would have added more value. The possible reasons could include pharmacogenetics, induced apoptosis, or other as-yet-unknown causes. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.