Comparing the efficacy and safety of particulate [microspheres/polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)] and non-particulate [n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA)] agents used as the embolic agents for bronchial artery embolization (BAE) intervention in patients experiencing massive hemoptysis. A total of 58 individuals (47 male, 11 female, standard deviation = 53.9 ± 14.8, age range = 18-84) were recruited for a retrospective study in a single unit. Thirty (51.7%) of the patients underwent BAE intervention with NBCA, and 28 (48.3%) underwent the same procedure with a particulate embolizing agent (microspheres/PVA). The demographic distribution of the patients, the etiological factors, the technical and clinical success rates, and complications were documented, with the two groups subsequently compared. The technical and clinical success rates following the procedure were 100% for both groups. The average follow-up duration was 34 months in the NBCA group and 33.5 months in the particulate embolizing agent group. In comparison, the rate of recurrent hemoptysis was 3.3% in the former and 17.9% in the latter, with the presence of recurrent hemoptysis not statistically different between the two groups (p = 0.097). Major complications and procedural death did not occur in either of the samples. The use of NBCA in BAE presents a safe and effective method. The combination of NBCA and particulate embolizing agents (PVA/microspheres) achieved equal technical and clinical success and significantly increased the hemoptysis-free survival rates in terms of life-threatening hemoptysis. (1) In managing massive hemoptysis, using NBCA is a safe and effective method similar to using particulate embolizing agents. (2) Although not statistically significant, recurrent hemoptysis is observed less frequently in the NBCA group. (3) Technique and clinical success were relatively high and similar in the groups where NBCA and particulate embolizing agents were used.
Read full abstract