Myositis-specific Autoantibodies Research Articles

Peripheral Blood Lymphocyte Subsets and Heterogeneity of B Cell Subsets in Patients of Idiopathic Inflammatory Myositis with Different Myositis-specific Autoantibodies.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a group of myopathies that present with muscle weakness and multiple extra-muscular manifestations, in which lymphocytes play central roles in myositis pathogenesis. This study aimed to explore the clinical characteristics of lymphocyte subsets, especially B cell subsets, in patients with IIM. Our study included 176 patients with active IIM and 210 gender/age-matched healthy controls (HCs). Compared to HCs, patients have reduced counts of T cells, B cells, and natural killer cells. In addition, B cell subsets from 153 patients with IIM and 92 HCs were characterized. Patients had a lower percentage of memory B cells and translational memory B cells, while those patients were with an elevated percentage of CD19+ B cells, plasmablast and naïve B cells compared with HCs. Moreover, to further explore the heterogeneity of B cells in IIM, patients were categorized into three clusters based on clustering analysis. Cluster 1 was dominated by CD19+ B cells, Bregs and naïve B cells, cluster 3 was dominated by memory B cells and plasmablast, and cluster 2 had the highest proportion of translational memory B cells. Notably, patients in cluster 1 presented with higher CK levels, indicating muscle damage, whereas patients in cluster 3 showed a higher incidence of chest tightness. Our study indicated that lymphopenia is a common manifestation in patients with IIM. B cell subsets are abnormally expressed and showed high heterogeneity in patients with IIM. The patients with IIM were divided into three different clusters with different percentages of chest tightness and distinct CK levels.

Myositis Autoantibody Profiles and Clinical Significance in Patients with Inflammatory Myopathies in Southwest China.

The purpose of this study is to analyze the distribution of myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) and myositis-associated autoantibodies (MAAs) in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) in southwest China and to explore the relevance between each subtype, each clinical feature, and to explore the relevance between the laboratory indexes. For this study, 200 patients with IIMs were tested for myositis autoantibodies. Clinical manifestations and laboratory metrics were collected and the correlations between autoantibodies and clinical phenotypes were analyzed. MSAs were found in 73.5% of the patients. The most frequently MSAs were anti-MDA5 (26.8%), followed by anti-ARS (18.5%). Anti-Ro52 was the most prevalent in MAAs (46.2%). Interstitial lung disease (ILD) and arthralgia were more frequent in anti-MDA5 and anti-Jo-1 positive groups (each p < 0.05). Anti-TIF1-γ and anti-NXP2 were associated with dysphagia (each p < 0.05). Different antibody subtypes were associated with laboratory indicators of response to muscle damage and immune status. Logistic regression showed that anti-MDA5 and anti-Jo-1 were independent risk factors for ILD (OR = 4.542, p = 0.004; OR = 4.290, p = 0.018, respectively) and arthralgia (OR = 7.856, p = 0.000; OR = 5.731, p = 0.004, respectively), whereas anti-TIF1-γ and anti-NXP2 were independent risk factors for dysphagia (OR = 4.521, p = 0.009; OR = 6.889, p = 0.017, respectively). Different antibody subtypes were associated with specific clinical features. Anti-MDA5 and anti-Jo-1 were independent risk factors for ILD and arthralgia. Anti-TIF1-γ and anti-NXP2 were independent risk factors for dysphagia.

Association between periungual changes and myositis-specific autoantibodies in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: A retrospective cohort study

Association between periungual changes and myositis-specific autoantibodies in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: A retrospective cohort study

Dermatomyositis

Dermatomyositis (DM) is distinguished from other idiopathic inflammatory myopathies by the characteristic skin rashes, muscle pathology, and muscle symptoms. Five myositis-specific autoantibodies have been identified in DM, and the correlation between each antibody and the clinical picture is clear. Pathological analysis has also identified DM as a type I interferonopathy of the skeletal muscle. Consideration of treatment strategies requires careful evaluation of muscle strength, systemic inflammatory findings, muscle pathology, muscle imaging, and complications such as malignancy and interstitial lung disease. Corticosteroids are administered as first-line treatment, and immunosuppressive agents and intravenous immunoglobulins are employed as important second-line treatments. Some patients exhibit resistance to these therapies. Currently, treatment strategies for refractory cases are not well established, necessitating further development of treatment methods.

Quid de la détection des anticorps anti-TIF1γ dans les dermatomyosites ?

AbstractThe classification of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IBD) is evolving, with the consideration, in addition to clinicopathological criteria, of the presence of autoantibodies specific to myositis for the diagnosis and identification of clinical forms.The diagnosis of dermatomyositis (DM) is based on clinical, histological, imaging criteria and the demonstration of myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSA). Within these antibodies, anti-TIF1γ have a special place due to their high prevalence in juvenile DM and in cancer-associated DM. Anti-TIF1γ antibodies are present in 7-31% of adult DMs. DMs with anti-TIF1γ are associated with cancer in more than half of cases in adults (38-75%), whereas this is not the case in juvenile DMs. The role of the TIF1γ protein in the tumor process and of autoantibodies in the triggering of DM are the subject of numerous hypotheses, but without any definitive conclusion currently.Given the diagnostic and prognostic importance of the presence of anti-TIF1γ antibodies, it is essential to have reliable tests suitable for routine practice to characterize them. The reference technique, immunoprecipitation, is not suitable for the routine laboratory. Immunodots are practical but their performance is not optimal in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Elisa and the particle-based multi-analyte technology (PMAT)-type automated technique seem to present performances close to immunoprecipitation but with a practicability adapted to routine use.

Pathologic Features of Anti-Ku Myositis.

Characteristics of myositis with anti-Ku antibodies are poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the pathologic features of myositis associated with anti-Ku antibodies, compared with immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) with anti-signal recognition particle (SRP) and anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) antibodies, in muscle biopsy-oriented registration cohorts in Japan and Germany. We performed a retrospective pathology review of patients with anti-Ku myositis samples diagnosed in the Japanese and German cohorts. We evaluated histologic features and performed HLA phenotyping. Fifty biopsied muscle samples in the Japanese cohort and 10 in the German cohort were obtained. After exclusion of myositis-specific autoantibodies or other autoimmune connective tissue diseases, 26 samples (43%) of anti-Ku antibody-positive myositis were analyzed. All the samples shared some common features with IMNM, whereas they showed expression of MHC class II and clusters of perivascular inflammatory cells more frequently than the anti-SRP/HMGCR IMNM samples (71% vs 7%/16%; p < 0.005/<0.005; 64% vs 0%/0%; p < 0.005/<0.005). Anti-Ku myositis biopsies could be divided into 2 subgroups based on the extent of necrosis and regeneration. The group with more abundant necrosis and regeneration showed a higher frequency of MHC class II expression and perivascular inflammatory cell clusters. HLA phenotyping in the 44 available patients showed possible associations of HLA-DRB1*03:01, HLA-DRB1*11:01, and HLA-DQB1*03:01 (p = 0.0045, 0.019, and 0.027; odds ratio [OR] 50.2, 4.6, and 2.8; 95% CI 2.6-2942.1, 1.1-14.5, and 1.0-7.0) in the group with less conspicuous necrosis and regeneration. On the contrary, in the group of more abundant necrosis and regeneration, the allele frequencies of HLA-A*24:02, HLA-B*52:01, HLA-C*12:02, and HLA-DRB1*15:02 were lower than those of healthy controls (p = 0.0036, 0.027, 0.016, and 0.026; OR = 0.27, 0, 0, and 0; 95% CI 0.1-0.7, 0-0.8, 0-0.8, and 0-0.8). However, these HLA associations did not remain significant after statistical correction for multiple testing. While anti-Ku myositis shows necrotizing myopathy features, they can be distinguished from anti-SRP/HMGCR IMNM by their MHC class II expression and clusters of perivascular inflammatory cells. The HLA analyses suggest that anti-Ku myositis may have different subsets associated with myopathologic subgroups.

Presenting clinical and imaging features of patients with clinically amyopathic interstitial lung disease associated with myositis-specific autoantibodies.

Lung involvement in the context of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies has significant impact on outcome; early and accurate diagnosis is important but can be difficult to achieve. In particular, patients without clinically evident muscle involvement pose a significant diagnostic challenge. A computer-assisted search was conducted to identify patients with amyopathic interstitial lung disease associated with the presence of myositis-specific autoantibodies. Medical records and chest imaging studies were reviewed to identify clinical and radiologic features at presentation. Of the 35 patients with amyopathic interstitial lung disease associated with myositis-specific autoantibodies, the median age was 65 years (range 43-78) and 20 were women (57%). Of the patients, 34% had previously visited the rheumatology department. Presenting symptoms consisted of dyspnea (94%), cough (43%), and arthritis (23%). Raynaud phenomenon, "mechanic hands," Gottron papules, and inspiratory crackles were present in 23, 31, 9, and 74% of patients, respectively. After a detailed history, none of the patients reported muscle weakness, while four (11%) exhibited increased CK levels; of these four, two had a concomitant increase in aldolase levels. Median FVC was 79% predicted (range: 49-135) and median DLco was 50% predicted (range: 17-103). HRCT pattern was suggestive of an alternative to UIP pattern in 31/33 (94%) patients; the most common imaging patterns were NSIP (49%) and NSIP/OP (39%). In patients with NSIP and NSIP/OP pattern, the presence of amyopathic interstitial lung disease associated with myositis-specific autoantibodies should be considered even in the absence of clinical evident myositis.

Anti-transcription intermediary factor 1 gamma antibody-associated paraneoplastic dermatomyositis: A case report

Dermatomyositis (DM) is an inflammatory myopathy characterized by distinctive cutaneous manifestations. Recent advancements have led to the identification of a novel myositis-specific autoantibody called anti-transcription intermediary factor 1 gamma (anti-TIF-1-γ) which presents with unique cutaneous manifestations and a heightened risk for malignancy. We report a case of a 55-year-old female who presented with proximal muscle weakness, an erythematous rash over the face, blanching erythema over the nape of the neck, and red-on-white lesions over the chest. She was diagnosed with anti-TIF-1-γ positive DM and found to have a palpable mass in the right breast. Biopsy showed triple negative invasive breast carcinoma no special type (NST) grade 3. She showed poor response to steroids and was referred for cancer staging and treatment. The anti-TIF-1-γ antibody serves as a novel tool to identify a subset of DM patients at high risk for cancer. At present, it’s role in the prognosis or surveillance of cancer recurrence remains uncertain.

Myositis-specific and Myositis-associated Autoantibodies in Saudi Patients

Myositis-specific and Myositis-associated Autoantibodies in Saudi Patients

Nailfold capillaroscopy findings of a multicentric multi-ethnic cohort of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

To assess nailfold video capillaroscopic (NVC) abnormalities and their association with clinical features, myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSA), and myositis-associated antibodies (MAA) in a large multi-ethnic cohort of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). We recruited 155 IIM patients from three centres in Mexico, Spain, and the USA. We evaluated the clinical and laboratory features of the patients and performed semiquantitative and quantitative analyses of the NVC. Each NVC study was defined as having a normal, non-specific, early systemic sclerosis (SSc), active SSc, or late SSc pattern. Twenty-three patients had at least one follow-up NVC when disease control was achieved. Quantitative variables were expressed as medians and interquartile range (IQR) and were compared with the Kruskal-Wallis, the Mann-Whitney U-test, and the Wilcoxon test for paired medians. Associations between qualitative variables were assessed with the χ2 test. Most patients were women (68.3%), Hispanic (73.5%), and had dermatomyositis (DM) (61.2%). Fourteen patients (9%) had a normal NVC. A non-specific abnormality pattern was the most frequent (53.9%), and was associated with joint involvement, interstitial lung disease, Jo1 autoantibodies, anti-synthetase syndrome, and immune-mediated necrotising myopathy. The SSc pattern was observed mostly in DM and overlap myositis and was associated with cutaneous features and anti-TIF-1g autoantibodies. After treatment, there was a decrease in the capillaroscopic score, the capillary diameter, and the number of avascular areas, and an increase in capillary density and bushy capillary number. NVC abnormalities are related to the diagnosis, clinical features, disease activity, and autoantibodies of patients with IIM.

Assessing the sensitivity and specificity of myositis-specific and associated autoantibodies: a sub-study from the MyoCite cohort.

Myositis-specific and associated autoantibodies are important biomarkers in routine clinical use. We assessed local testing performance for myositis autoantibodies by comparing line immunoassay (LIA) to protein radio-immunoprecipitation and identifying clinical characteristics associated with each myositis autoantibody in the MyoCite cohort. Serum samples from patients within the MyoCite cohort, a well-characterised retro-prospective dataset of adult and juvenile idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) patients in Lucknow, India (2017-2020), underwent LIA at Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Science (SGPGIMS), Lucknow. Immunoprecipitation of 147 IIM patient serum samples (125 adult-onset, 22 juvenile-onset) was conducted at the University of Bath, with researchers blind to LIA results. LIA performance was assessed against Immunoprecipitation as the reference standard, measuring sensitivity, specificity, and inter-rater agreement. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression determined clinical associations for specific MSA. Immunoprecipitation identified myositis autoantibodies in 56.5% (n = 83) of patient samples, with anti-Jo1 (n = 16; 10.9%) as the most common, followed by anti-MDA5 (n = 14, 9.5%). While LIA showed good agreement for anti-Jo1, anti-PL7 and anti-PL12 (Cohen's κ 0.79, 0.83, and 1, respectively), poor agreement was observed in other subgroups, notably anti-TIF1γ (Cohen's κ 0.21). Strongly positive samples, especially in myositis-specific autoantibodies, correlated more with immunoprecipitation results. Overall, 59 (40.1%) samples exhibited non-congruence on LIA and Immunoprecipitation, and κ values for LIA's for anti-TIF1γ, anti-Ku, anti-PmScl, anti-Mi2, and anti-SAE ranged between 0.21-0.60. While LIA reliably detected anti-Jo1, anti-PL7, anti-PL12, anti-MDA5, and anti-NXP-2, it also displayed false positives and negatives. Its effectiveness in detecting other autoantibodies, such as anti-TIF1γ, was poor.

Murine models of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are divided into polymyositis and dermatomyositis (DM) with specific cutaneous manifestation. Several myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) have been identified in IIMs and were found to be associated with distinct clinical features, including anti-synthetase syndrome (ASyS) and immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM). Moreover, MSA-related clinical features have been identified even within DM. Although MSAs are valuable for the diagnosis of IIMs, the pathogenic roles of these antibodies remain unknown. To investigate the pathogenesis of IIMs, classical murine models of autoimmune myositis, experimental autoimmune myositis, and C protein-induced myositis have been established by immunization with muscle-specific antigens, myosin, and myosin-binding skeletal C protein, respectively. To according to MSA-related autoimmunity, a murine model of ASyS was generated by immunization with a murine recombinant histidyl-transfer RNA (tRNA) synthetase, Jo-1, in which muscle and lung inflammation are induced depending on acquired immunity. Furthermore, it was found that the transfer of human Immunoglobulin G (IgGs) from patients with IMNM, comprising anti-signal recognition particles and anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase antibodies, induced complement-mediated myositis in recipient mice. We found that CD8+ T cell-mediated myositis can be established depending on autoimmunity against transcriptional intermediary factor 1γ (TIF1γ), an autoantigen for MSAs induced by recombinant human TIF1γ immunization. These new murine models reflecting MSA-associated IIMs will reveal the immunological mechanisms underlying IIMs.

Clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis associated with cutaneous ulcerations: a case-based review

Introduction and importance: Dermatomyositis (DM) is an autoimmune myopathy primarily affecting both muscles and skin. When muscle weakness is not clinically apparent, but characteristic skin lesions are present, the condition is referred to as clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis (CADM). Case presentation: The authors present the case of a 52-year-old female with a typical DM rash, interstitial pneumonia, and multiple skin ulcers. The skin biopsy was consistent with DM, and there were no signs of muscle involvement. Myositis-related and myositis-specific autoantibodies were also negative. Significant improvement was not observed until the patient received successive monthly pulses of methylprednisolone and the introduction of methotrexate. This treatment regimen allowed for the complete tapering of prednisone and resulted in sustained disease control. Clinical discussion: In addition to the case presentation, a narrative literature review was conducted using the MEDLINE database, and an evidence-based treatment flowchart is proposed. CADM is a subtype of DM, related to higher incidences of interstitial lung disease, skin vasculopathy and malignancy. When ulcers or interstitial pneumonia are present, treatment should be early and aggressive. Active screening for neoplasms is recommended, particularly within the first 5 years. Conclusion: The authors presented a case of seronegative CADM featuring skin vasculopathy, successfully treated with consecutive methylprednisolone pulses. Our literature review emphasized the importance of focused CADM management trials, highlighting the need for further research.

Progressive pulmonary fibrosis in myositis-specific antibody-positive interstitial pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) frequently coexists with interstitial pneumonia (IP) and is commonly the initial or sole manifestation accompanied by positive myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs), even in the absence of meeting diagnostic criteria. This study aims to evaluate the proportion of progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) and identify potential predictors influencing the progression of pulmonary fibrosis in patients with MSA-IP. This descriptive study employed a retrospective cohort design, enrolling patients diagnosed with interstitial pneumonia and positive MSAs at Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital in a sequential manner. Clinical data were systematically collected from the patients' medical records during regular follow-up visits conducted every 3 to 6 months. Cox regression analysis was utilized to identify independent predictors of PPF in patients with positive MSAs and interstitial pneumonia. A total of 307 patients were included in the study, with 30.6% of them developing PPF during a median follow-up period of 22 months. Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated a significantly lower survival in the PPF patients compared to the non-PPF patients (median 11.6 months vs. 31 months, p = 0.000). An acute/subacute onset of interstitial pneumonia (HR 3.231, 95%CI 1.936-5.392, p = 0.000), lower diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) % predicted (HR 6.435, 95%CI 4.072-10.017, p = 0.001), and the presence of diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) (HR 8.679, 95%CI 1.974-38.157, p = 0.004) emerged as independent predictors of PPF. Notably, the implementation of triple therapy comprising glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, and antifibrotic drugs was associated with a reduced risk of developing PPF (HR 0.322, 95%CI 0.115-0.899, p = 0.031). Approximately 30.6% of patients with MSA-IP may develop PPF within the follow-up period. Patients presenting with an acute/subacute onset of interstitial pneumonia, lower predicted DLCO SB% and evidence of DAD on HRCT are more susceptible to developing PPF. Conversely, the administration of triple therapy appears to serve as a protective factor against the development of PPF in patients with MSA-IP.

Contribution of Complement, Microangiopathy and Inflammation in Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are a heterogeneous group characterized by muscle weakness and skin symptoms and are categorized into six subtypes: dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM), anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS), immune-mediated myopathy (IMNM), inclusion body myopathy (IBM), and overlap myositis. Myositis-specific autoantibodies were detected for the diagnosis and classification of IIM. This review highlights the pathogenic contributions of the complement system, microangiopathy, and inflammation in IIM. Deposition of complement around capillaries and/or the sarcolemma was observed in muscle biopsy specimens from patients with DM, ASS, and IMNM, suggesting the pathomechanism of complement-dependent muscle and endothelial cell injury. A recent study using human muscle microvascular endothelial cells showed that Jo-1 antibodies from ASS induce complement-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in vitro. Based on both clinical and pathological observations, antibody- and complement-mediated microangiopathy may contribute to the development of DM and anti-Jo-1 ASS. Juvenile DM is characterized by the loss of capillaries, perivascular inflammation, and small-vessel angiopathies, which may be related to microinfarction and perifascicular atrophy. Several serum biomarkers that reflect the IFN1 signature and microangiopathy are elevated in patients with DM. The pathological observation of myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA), which suggests a type 1 interferon (IFN1) signature in DM, supports the diagnosis and further understanding of the pathomechanism of IIM. A recent report showed that an increase in triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells (TREM-1) around perimysial blood vessels and muscles in patients with IIM plays a role in triggering inflammation and promoting the migration of inflammatory cells by secreting proinflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor α. The deposition of complement in muscles and capillaries is a characteristic feature of DM, ASS, and IMNM. Microangiopathy plays a pathogenic role in DM, possibly resulting in perifascicular atrophy. Further understanding of the detailed pathomechanism regarding complement, microangiopathy, and inflammation may lead to novel therapeutic approaches for IIM.

Dermatomyositis: Practical Guidance and Unmet Needs.

Dermatomyositis is a heterogeneous idiopathic inflammatory myopathy associated with various cutaneous manifestations and variable presence of myositis, interstitial lung disease, and other visceral organ involvement. An accurate diagnosis of dermatomyositis requires correlating clinical examination findings with serological and histological findings. Familiarity with pathognomonic and common cutaneous manifestations of dermatomyositis, which are highlighted here, can be especially helpful in making an accurate diagnosis. Additionally, evaluating patients for presence of myositis-specific autoantibodies can further support or refute a dermatomyositis diagnosis. When present, myositis-specific autoantibodies can also help guide workups for various dermatomyositis-associated manifestations, as each is associated with relatively distinct clinical characteristics. Evaluating patients for various systemic manifestations often relies on expert opinion recommendations; however, societal guideline statements concerning the evaluation of some manifestations have recently been described. Although malignancy-associated dermatomyositis is a well-accepted subtype, there is limited evidence to support extensive malignancy screening has a favorable benefit-risk ratio in most dermatomyositis patients. However, recent research has uncovered novel associations between dermatomyositis and malignancy, suggesting the possibility of identifying high-risk subsets of dermatomyositis patients in whom malignancy screening may have a high value. Treatment for dermatomyositis has remained largely unchanged over the past several decades. Although many dermatomyositis patients can be effectively treated with current options, either as monotherapy or with combination regimens, there is a need for more targeted and effective DM therapies, in general, and for MDA5(+) dermatomyositis-associated rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease. Fortunately, significant current and emerging research activities evaluating various novel medications for dermatomyositis provide hope for exciting future advances in patients with this intriguing immune-mediated disease.

Advances in the diagnostics and treatment of juvenile dermatomyositis

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is by far the most frequent inflammatory myopathy in childhood and adolescence. It is clinically characterized by inflammatory changes of the skin and muscles but as amultisystemic disease can also affect the skeletal system, the gastrointestinal tract, lungs and heart. Intrinsic (multigenetic risk) and extrinsic factors (triggers) are involved in the pathogenesis resulting in endothelial damage, involvement of fascies, activation of the interferon system and autoimmune reactions including formation of myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSA). In contrast to dermatomyositis in adults, in children and adolescents there are no associations with malignant diseases. The variable expression, the rarity of the disease and the risk of long-term damage and complications necessitate pediatric rheumatological experience in the diagnostics and treatment. Recently, new approaches in drug treatment have substantially improved the outcome and prognosis but amultidisciplinary treatment (including physicians, physiotherapists, psychologists, social workers) is mandatory, especially in the first phases of the disease. Particularly important is aprofessionally correct treatment of the functional sequelae, which are aparticular focus of this article.

Research progress on the dermatomyositis specific autoantibodies and malignancy associated dermatomyositis.

Dermatomyositis (DM) is an autoimmune disease often complicated with malignant tumors. More than 50% of DM patients have myositis specific autoantibodies in their bodies. DM specific autoantibodies [including anti-migration inhibitory factor (Mi)-2 antibody, anti-nuclear matrix protein (NXP)-2 antibody, anti-transcription intermediary factor (TIF) 1-γ antibody, and anti-small ubiquitin like modifier activating enzyme (SAE) antibody] play important roles in the pathogenesis of malignancy associated DM. Revealing the role of DM specific autoantibodies in the development of malignant tumors in DM patients can provide important evidence for accurately assessing the risk of developing malignant tumors in DM patients, and also provide new ideas for clinical diagnosis of DM and precise treatment.

Characteristics and prognostic implications of peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets in patients with anti-MDA5 antibody positive dermatomyositis-interstitial lung disease

ObjectivesTo examine the characteristics of blood lymphocyte subsets in dermatomyositis-interstitial lung disease (DM-ILD) inflicted patients with positive anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (anti-MDA5), as well as its prognosis value in this set of patients.MethodsData were retrospectively collected from 253 DM-ILD patients from three hospitals in China between January 2016 to January 2021. Patients were grouped into anti-MDA5 antibody positive group (MDA5+ DM-ILD) and anti-MDA5 antibody negative group (MDA5− DM-ILD) based on myositis-specific autoantibody test results. Demographic characteristics, lymphocyte subsets patterns and other clinical features were compared between the two groups. The association of lymphocyte subsets with 180-day mortality was investigated using survival analysis in MDA5+ DM-ILD.ResultsOut of 253 eligible patients with DM-ILD, 59 patients were anti-MDA5+ and 194 were anti-MDA5−. Peripheral blood lymphocyte count, CD3+ count, percentage of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ count, and CD3+CD8+ count was lower in MDA5+ DM-ILD than in MDA5− DM-ILD− (all P < 0.001) as well as CD3−CD19+ count (P = 0.04). In MDA5+ DM-ILD, CD3+CD8+ count ≤ 49.22 cell/μL (HR = 3.81, 95%CI [1.20,12.14]) and CD3-CD19+ count ≤ 137.64 cell/μL (HR = 3.43, 95%CI [1.15,10.24]) were independent predictors of mortality. CD3+CD8+ count ≤ 31.38 cell/μL was associated with a higher mortality risk in all DM-ILD patients (HR = 8.6, 95%CI [2.12,31.44]) after adjusting for anti-MDA5 and other clinical characteristics.ConclusionSignificant lymphocytes decrease was observed in MDA5+ DM-ILD patients. CD3+CD8+ cell count was associated with worse prognosis in both MDA5+ DM-ILD and all DM-ILD patients.

Antisynthetase syndrome: a case report and review of the literature.

antisynthetase syndrome is a rare autoimmune disease characterized byinterstitial lung disease, non-erosive arthritis, myositis, Raynaud&amp;#39;s disease, and/or &amp;quot;mechanichand&amp;quot; when autoantibodies directed against aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are detected.Antisynthetase syndrome belongs to the group of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies and isthe so-called overlap myositis. The article provides the latest literature data on the diagnosticvalue of myositis-specific autoantibodies based on a literature review for the period from2013 to 2023 using the scientometric databases MEDLINE/ PubMed, Wiley Online Library,and Scopus. Data from the literature show that certain myositis-specific autoantibodies,namely anti-PL-7 and anti-PL-12, can affect the risk of developing interstitial lung disease,and determine the course and prognosis of the disease. The presence of interstitial lungdisease in patients with myositis correlates with increased morbidity and mortality. Thearticle describes a clinical case of the debut of the antisynthetase syndrome from interstitiallung disease, which was falsely diagnosed as a coronavirus disease. The patient&amp;#39;s condition&#x0D; improved only because of using glucocorticoids, which the patient stopped taking over time,which led to the worsening of pulmonary symptoms, the appearance of new clinical signs ofdamage to the joints and skin, progressive decrease in muscle function, and dysphagia. Afteran examination in the rheumatology department, based on the presence of interstitial lungdisease in the patient - fibrotic alveolitis, which was confirmed by computer tomography,myositis, arthritis, characteristic skin changes, the presence of antinuclear antibodies, anti-SS-A/Ro52, specific antisynthetase antibodies (Jo-1, Pl-7, Pl-12), the diagnosis of theantisynthetase syndrome was established. A detailed laboratory and instrumental examinationmade it possible to rule out a paraneoplastic process at the time of examination. Theprescribed treatment included pulse therapy with methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide,which led to improvement in the patient&amp;#39;s condition. The work carried out emphasizes theneed for interdisciplinary interaction of pulmonologists, rheumatologists, and infectiousdisease specialists at the stage of verification of the final diagnosis and the therapyappointment. Achieving clinical and laboratory remission of the disease requires long-termmonitoring by a rheumatologist.