Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project Research Articles

Ethnic disparity in the care and management of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and its impact on short-term and long-term survival: a long-term study of a national registry

Abstract Background Previous examination of data from the United Kingdom indicates no apparent ethnic disparity in the treatment of patients hospitalised with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). However, it remains uncertain whether this lack of disparity results in similar long-term survival outcomes among ethnic minority groups, particularly those with multiple underlying risk factors for coronary artery disease, when compared to White patients. Purpose To assess the impact of quality of care on short-term and long-term survival among NSTEMI patients while examining disparities based on ethnicity. Methods We analysed records of 252,964 individuals diagnosed with NSTEMI from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project database spanning 2005 to 2019, alongside Office of National Statistics data for mortality. Among them, 233,158 were identified as White patients, while 19,806 were categorised as belonging to ethnic minority groups (Asian, Black, and mixed ethnicity). Propensity score matching was used to compare average treatment effects between cohorts while survival was compared using Cox regression model. Results Ethnic minorities were younger (median age in years) (66 vs. 73, P < 0.001), predominantly male (70% vs. 63%, P < 0.001), and exhibited a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors such as diabetes (52% vs. 24%, P < 0.001), hypertension (67% vs. 54%, P < 0.001), hypercholesterolemia (49% vs. 34%, P < 0.001), and chronic renal dysfunction (13% vs. 8%, P < 0.001). Ethnic minorities more frequently underwent invasive coronary angiography (80% vs. 68%, P < 0.001), percutaneous coronary intervention (53% vs. 44%, P < 0.001), and coronary artery bypass grafting (5% vs. 4%, P < 0.001). After conducting propensity score matching, both cohorts had no significant differences in in-hospital all-cause mortality [odds ratio (OR) 1.13, confidence interval (CI) 0.89 – 1.43; P = 0.268], cardiac mortality (OR 1.20, CI 0.89 – 1.54; P = 0.209), one-year mortality (OR 1.01, CI 0.89 – 1.13; P = 0.893) and major adverse cardiovascular events (OR 1.21, CI 0.95 – 1.48; P = 0.108). However, upon conducting a five-year survival analysis, ethnic minorities had better survival rates than their White counterparts (Hazard ratio (HR) 0.89, CI 0.86-0.92; P < 0.001). Conclusions Despite ethnic minorities being at a higher risk for coronary artery disease, our findings indicate that they experience better five-year survival rates than White patients. This suggests equitable access to care and potentially a more aggressive treatment approach in this relatively young patient cohort.

Can a chest pain virtual ward be used to safely manage patients with low-risk acute coronary syndrome?

Abstract Background Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) accounts for approximately 2-6% of emergency department (ED) presentations and contributes at least 20% of the overall acute hospital admissions(1-3). Patients presenting with low-risk ACS may be suitable for remote monitoring(4) while awaiting angiogram in chest pain virtual ward(CPVW) thereby improving patient flow and resource utilisation. Purpose We aimed to assess outcomes for patients with low-risk ACS admitted in a district general hospital with a view to establish an onboarding pathway for CPVW whilst ensuring a safe monitoring without effecting the readmission rate or all-cause mortality. Methods We retrospectively analysed the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) registry of from March 2022 to April 2023 for patients who presented to ED with a diagnosis of confirmed ACS. Patients were stratified into low-risk (GRACE score <140, HEART score <4, non-dynamic ECG, non-dynamic troponin, without ongoing chest pain), all other patients were deemed intermediate-to-high-risk ACS. Baseline demographics, the total length of acute admission days, waiting time before and after coronary investigation ,adverse events (escalation of therapy, death)whilst awaiting for invasive inpatient angiogram were calculated. The primary endpoint was 30-day readmission and all-cause mortality. Results 1077 patients were coded as ACS diagnosis in ED. 561(52.1%) had a confirmed diagnosis of ACS. Data to allow stratification was available for 538 patients, included in final analysis. 377(70.1%) were male with a mean age of 66.8 ± SD 13.1 years. A significant number of patients had other comorbidities, including hypertension (66.1%), diabetes (45.3%), hyperlipidaemia (51.3%), and previous history of IHD (46.5%). Total number of patients stratified into low-risk ACS was 55(10.2%), intermediate-to-high-risk group contained 483(89.8%) patients. The median total-length-of-stay (LOS) for low-risk ACS patients was 4 days(IQR 2-7), waiting time to have an inpatient angiogram was 3 days(IQR 0-5), and discharge time post-angiogram was 1 day(IQR 0-2). 4 patients(7.3%) in low-risk cohort required CCU admission for GTN infusion due to ongoing chest pain, among them 3 patients(5.5%) had abnormal coronary angiogram. 5 patients(9.1%) in low-risk cohort were readmitted due to chest pain post-angiogram and no patients had 30-days or 1-year all-cause mortality. The result depicts 51 patients from low-risk cohort would have been eligible for CPVW reducing the LOS from median 4 days to 1-2 days, this is a saving of 102-153 acute bed days per year. Assuming the costing of a bed day is £320 this equates to £32,640 - £48,960 cost saving without any adverse outcomes. Conclusion Our data suggests that there is a large cost saving with minimal risk in managing patients with low-risk ACS via a CPVW. This pathway of management is likely to have benefit in patient flow and resource utilisation in our district general hospital trust.Comparison of different ACS cohortsCPVW flow-diagram

Addressing disparities in the long-term mortality of non-ST segment myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients according to the presence of diabetes mellitus: a nationwide cohort study

Abstract Background Diabetes mellitus (DM) is an important risk factor for non−ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). How DM is related to management and longer-term clinical outcomes in contemporary NSTEMI cohorts is not well described. Methods and Results We analysed data on 456,376 adults hospitalised with NSTEMI from the United Kingdom Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) registry, linked with Office for National Statistics (ONS) death registry. We compared outcomes and quality of care by DM status. People with DM were older (median age 74 vs. 73 years, p<0.001) and more commonly of Asian ethnicity (13% vs. 4%, p< 0.001). Those with DM underwent invasive coronary angiography (59% vs. 63%, p <0.001) or revascularization (PCI or CABG) (38% vs. 40%, p <0.001) less frequently. Mortality risks for people with DM were significantly higher at 30-days (HR: 1.06, CI; 1.04-1.09, p <0.001), 1-year, (HR: 1.17, CI; 1.15-1.18, p <0.001) and 5-years, (HR: 1.25, CI; 1.24-1.26, p <0.001), when compared to people without DM. In people with DM, higher-quality inpatient care, assessed by opportunity-based quality-indicator score category (OBQI; poor, fair, good or excellent), was associated with lower mortality rates (good: HR 0.70, CI 0.67-0.73, P<0.001; excellent: HR 0.59, CI 0.57- 0.62, P<0.001), when compared to people receiving poor quality care. In people with DM, "excellent-care", compared to those receiving poor quality care, was associated with the lowest mortality in diet-treated or insulin-treated subgroups (diet-treated: HR 0.55, CI 0.50-0.61, P<0.001)(insulin-treated: 0.60 CI 0.56-0.64, P<0.001). Conclusion People with DM experience wide disparities in inpatient care following NSTEMI. They have a higher risk of long-term mortality compared to people without DM, with some evidence that better quality inpatient care is linked to better survival.

The processes of care and long-term mortality of acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock survivors: A nationwide cohort study

BackgroundAcute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) carries a significant risk of inpatient mortality compared with AMI alone, although it is unclear what the longer-term outcomes of AMI-CS survivors is, and whether the inpatient quality of care received influences this. MethodsUsing the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) registry, linked to Office for National Statistics (ONS) mortality data, we analyzed 330,517 UK AMI patients; 3330 (1 %) with CS. Patients dying within thirty-days of admission were excluded. Median follow-up for patients included was 1642 days. Cox regression models were fitted, adjusting for demographics and management strategy. ResultsAMI-CS survivors were younger (median years) (67 vs. 69, p < 0.001), less often female (29 % vs. 32 %, p < 0.001) and more likely to present with STEMI (81 % vs. 37 %, p < 0.001). Mortality risk was highest at one-year for AMI-CS survivors compared to patients that did not suffer CS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.85; 95 % CI; 1.68–2.04, p < 0.001), and remained elevated at five-years (HR 1.55; 95 % CI; 1.43–1.68, p < 0.001). ‘Excellent-care’ according to mean opportunity-based quality indicator (OBQI) score compared to ‘Poor-care’, showed reduced risk of long-term mortality with AMI-CS (HR: 0.46, CI; 0.39–0.54, P < 0.001). Of patients that received “Excellent-care”, AMI-CS survivors had elevated risk of long-term mortality (HR 1.45, 95 % CI; 1.34–1.57, P < 0.001). ConclusionAMI-CS survivors have elevated risk long-term mortality risk when compared with AMI patients, which persists beyond five years. AMI-CS patients that receive higher-quality inpatient care have better longer-term survival compared to those with poorer inpatient care.

Addressing disparities in the long-term mortality risk in individuals with non-ST segment myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) by diabetes mellitus status: a nationwide cohort study.

The aim of this study was to investigate how diabetes mellitus affects longer term outcomes in individuals presenting to hospital with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). We analysed data from 456,376 adults hospitalised between January 2005 and March 2019 with NSTEMI from the UK Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) registry, linked with Office for National Statistics death reporting. We compared outcomes and quality of care by diabetes status. Individuals with diabetes were older (median age 74 vs 73 years), were more often of Asian ethnicity (13% vs 4%) and underwent revascularisation (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery) (38% vs 40%) less frequently than those without diabetes. The mortality risk for those with diabetes compared with those without was significantly higher at 30 days (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.15, 1.23), 1 year (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.26, 1.31), 5 years (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.34, 1.38) and 10 years (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.36, 1.42). In individuals with diabetes, higher quality inpatient care, assessed by opportunity-based quality indicator (OBQI) score category ('poor', 'fair', 'good' or 'excellent'), was associated with lower mortality rates compared with poor care (good: HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.73, 0.76; excellent: HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.68, 0.71). In addition, compared with poor care, excellent care in the diabetes group was associated with the lowest mortality rates in the diet-treated and insulin-treated subgroups (diet-treated: HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.61, 0.68; insulin-treated: HR 0.69, CI 0.66, 0.72). Individuals with diabetes experience disparities during inpatient care following NSTEMI. They have a higher risk of long-term mortality than those without diabetes, and higher quality inpatient care may lead to better long-term survival.

Adverse outcomes after surgery after a cerebrovascular accident or acute coronary syndrome: a retrospective observational cohort study

BackgroundDelaying surgery after a major cardiovascular event might reduce adverse postoperative outcomes. The time interval represents a potentially modifiable risk factor but is not well studied. MethodsThis was a longitudinal retrospective population-based cohort study, linking data from Hospital Episode Statistics for NHS England and the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project. Adults undergoing noncardiac, non-neurologic surgery in 2007–2018 were included. The time interval between a preoperative cardiovascular event and surgery was the main exposure. The outcomes of interest were acute coronary syndrome (ACS), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), cerebrovascular accident (CVA) within 1 year of surgery, unplanned readmission (at 30 days and 1 year), and prolonged length of stay. Multivariable logistic regression models with restricted cubic splines were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs; age, sex, socioeconomic deprivation, and comorbidities). ResultsIn total, 877 430 people had a previous cardiovascular event and 20 582 717 were without an event. CVA, ACS, and AMI in the year after elective surgery were more frequent after prior cardiovascular events (adjusted hazard ratio 2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.08–2.16). Prolonged hospital stay (aOR 1.36, 95% CI 1.35–1.38) and 30-day (aOR 1.28, 95% CI 1.25–1.30) and 1-yr (aOR 1.60, 95% CI 1.58–1.62) unplanned readmission were more common after major operations in those with a prior cardiovascular event. After adjusting for the time interval between preoperative events until surgery, elective operations within 37 months were associated with an increased risk of postoperative ACS or AMI. The risk of postoperative stroke plateaued after a 20-month interval until surgery, irrespective of surgical urgency. ConclusionsThese observational data suggest increased adverse outcomes after a recent cardiovascular event can occur for up to 37 months after a major cardiovascular event.

The Intersection of Socioeconomic Differences and Sex in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Patients with lower socioeconomic status (SES) have poorer outcomes following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) than patients with higher SES; however, how sex modifies socioeconomic differences is unclear. Using the United Kingdom (UK) Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) registry, alongside Office of National Statistics (ONS) mortality data, we analyzed 736,420 AMI patients between 2005 and 2018, stratified by Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) score Quintiles (most affluent [Q1] to most deprived [Q5]). There was no significant difference in probability of in-hospital mortality in our adjusted model according to sex. The probability of 30-day mortality in our adjusted model was similar between men and women throughout Quintiles, ((Q5; Men 7.6%; 95% CI 7.3-7.8% (P < .001), Women; 7.0%; 95% CI 6.8-7.3%, P < .001)) ((Q1; Men 7.1%; 95% CI 6.8-7.4%, P < .001, Women; 6.9%; 95% CI 6.6-7.1%, P < .001)). The probability of one-year mortality in our adjusted model was higher in men throughout all Quintiles (Q1; Men 15.0%; 95% CI 14.8-15.6%), P < .001, Women; 14.5%; 95% CI 14.2-14.9%, P < .001) (Q5; Men 16.9%; 95% CI 16.5-17.3%, P < .001, Women; 15.5%; 95% CI 15.1-15.9 by %, P < .001). Overall, female sex did not significantly influence the effect of deprivation on AMI processes of care and outcomes.

Bleeding risk prediction after acute myocardial infarction-integrating cancer data: the updated PRECISE-DAPT cancer score.

This study assessed the impact of incorporating cancer as a predictor on performance of the PRECISE-DAPT score. A nationally linked cohort of ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients between 1 January 2005 and 31 March 2019 was derived from the UK Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project and the UK Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care registries. The primary outcome was major bleeding at 1 year. A new modified score was generated by adding cancer as a binary variable to the PRECISE-DAPT score using a Cox regression model and compared its performance to the original PRECISE-DAPT score. A total of 216 709 ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients were included, of which 4569 had cancer. The original score showed moderate accuracy (C-statistic .60), and the modified score showed modestly higher discrimination (C-statistics .64; hazard ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.04) even in patients without cancer (C-statistics .63; hazard ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.04). The net reclassification index was .07. The bleeding rates of the modified score risk categories (high, moderate, low, and very low bleeding risk) were 6.3%, 3.8%, 2.9%, and 2.2%, respectively. According to the original score, 65.5% of cancer patients were classified as high bleeding risk (HBR) and 21.6% were low or very low bleeding risk. According to the modified score, 94.0% of cancer patients were HBR, 6.0% were moderate bleeding risk, and no cancer patient was classified as low or very low bleeding risk. Adding cancer to the PRECISE-DAPT score identifies the majority of patients with cancer as HBR and can improve its discrimination ability without undermining its performance in patients without cancer.

The quality of care and long-term mortality of out of hospital cardiac arrest survivors after acute myocardial infarction: a nationwide cohort study.

The long-terms outcomes of out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors are not well known. Using the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) registry, linked to Office for National Statistics (ONS) mortality data, we analysed 661326 England, Wales and Northern-Ireland AMI patients; 14127 (2%) suffered OHCA and survived beyond thirty-days of hospitalisation. Patients dying within thirty-days of admission were excluded. Mean follow-up for patients included was 1500 days. Cox regression models were fitted, adjusting for demographics and management strategy. OHCA survivors were younger (in years) (64 (interquartile range [IQR] 54-72) vs. 70 (IQR 59-80), P<0.001), more often underwent invasive coronary angiography (88%vs. 71%, P<0.001) and percutaneous coronary intervention (72%vs. 45%, P<0.001). Overall, risk of mortality for OHCA patients that survived past 30-days was lower than patients that did not suffer cardiac arrest (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.91; 95% CI; 0.87-0.95, P<0.001). 'Excellent care' according to the mean opportunity-based quality indicator (OBQI) score compared to 'Poor care', predicted reduced risk of long-term mortality post OHCA, for all-patients (HR: 0.77, CI; 0.76-0.78, P<0.001), more for STEMI patients (HR: 0.73, CI; 0.71-0.75, P<0.001), but less significantly in NSTEMI patients (HR: 0.79, CI; 0.78-0.81, P<0.001). Out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients remain at significant risk of mortality in-hospital. However, if surviving over thirty-days post arrest, OHCA survivors have good longer-term survival up to ten-years compared to the general AMI population. Higher quality inpatient care appears to improve long-term survival in all OHCA patients, more so in STEMI.

Exploring Clinical Trajectories and the Continuum of Care for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome in the United Kingdom: A Thorough Cross-Sectional Analysis.

The United Kingdom (UK) has a sustainable healthcare system. Nonetheless, the burden of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is still a significant challenge. A scarcity of literature primarily focuses on the continuum of care for ACS patients in the UK. Moreover, limited research studies highlight the clinical trajectories of ACS patients across the UK. Therefore, the current study was designed to explore clinical trajectories and the continuum of care for patients with ACS in the UK. Secondary data was obtained from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) database. The latest data available in the MINAP database was used. As our objective was to explore clinical trajectories and the continuum of care for patients, we retrieved data regarding the care received by ACS patients admitted to hospitals across the UK. The data of 85574 ACS patients was retrieved. A large number (n=47035) of patients were estimated to be eligible for the angiogram; however, an angiogram was performed for 87.15% (n=40995) of eligible patients. Angioplasty within 72 hours of admission was required for most (n=26313) ACS patients. Nonetheless, angioplasty within 72 hours of admission was performed for 59.7% (n=15703) of the eligible patients. There was a significant difference (P<0.05) between different regions of the UK and the percentage of patients for whom angioplasty was performed within 72 hours of admission. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed for 23923 ACS patients, of which the door-to-balloon interval for 17590 (73.5%) patients was ≤60 minutes while the door-to-balloon interval for 3086 (12.9%) patients was ≤90 minutes. Out of the total 85574 ACS patients, 65959 (77.08%) patients were discharged on appropriate medications, while 19615 (22.92%) were transferred to another hospital or died there. A total of 75361 were eligible to be referred to cardiac rehabilitation settings. Nonetheless, 64518 (85.61%) were referred to cardiac rehabilitation. About 85000 patients were reported in the UK (England, Northern Ireland, Wales). Optimal care was provided to most patients in the UK. However, some patients received sub-optimal care, highlighting the disparity in the healthcare system. There is a need to explore further the factors that might be responsible for the sub-optimal care to the patients.

Risk of Mortality Following Surgery in Patients With a Previous Cardiovascular Event

There is a lack of consensus regarding the interval of time-dependent postoperative mortality risk following acute coronary syndrome or stroke. To determine the magnitude and duration of risk associated with the time interval between a preoperative cardiovascular event and 30-day postoperative mortality. This is a longitudinal retrospective population-based cohort study. This study linked data from the Hospital Episode Statistics for National Health Service England, Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project and the Office for National Statistics mortality registry. All adults undergoing a National Health Service-funded noncardiac, nonneurologic surgery in England between April 1, 2007, and March 31, 2018, registered in Hospital Episode Statistics Admitted Patient Care were included. Data were analyzed from July 2021 to July 2022. The time interval between a previous cardiovascular event (acute coronary syndrome or stroke) and surgery. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were postoperative mortality at 60, 90, and 365 days. Multivariable logistic regression models with restricted cubic splines were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios. There were 877 430 patients with and 20 582 717 without a prior cardiovascular event (overall mean [SD] age, 53.4 [19.4] years; 11 577 157 [54%] female). Among patients with a previous cardiovascular event, the time interval associated with increased risk of postoperative mortality was surgery within 11.3 months (95% CI, 10.8-11.7), with subgroup risks of 14.2 months before elective surgery (95% CI, 13.3-15.3) and 7.3 months for emergency surgery (95% CI, 6.8-7.8). Heterogeneity in these timings was noted across many surgical specialties. The time-dependent risk intervals following stroke and myocardial infarction were similar, but the absolute risk was greater following a stroke. Regarding surgical urgency, the risk of 30-day mortality was higher in those with a prior cardiovascular event for emergency surgery (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.34-1.37) and an elective procedure (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.78-1.89) than those without a prior cardiovascular event. In this study, surgery within 1 year of an acute coronary syndrome or stroke was associated with increased postoperative mortality before reaching a new baseline, particularly for elective surgery. This information may help clinicians and patients balance deferring the potential benefits of the surgery against the desire to avoid increased mortality from overly expeditious surgery after a recent cardiovascular event.

Temporal analysis of non-ST segment elevation-acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) outcomes in ‘young’ patients under the age of fifty: A nationwide cohort study

BackgroundThe characteristics and risk factor profile of young patients presenting with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) and how they may have changed over time is not well reported. MethodsWe identified 26,708 NSTEACS patients aged under 50 presenting to United Kingdom (UK) hospitals between 2010 and 2017 from Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP). We calculated incidence of NSTEACS per 100,000 UK population, using Office of National Statistics (ONS) population estimates, prevalence of comorbidities, ethnicity, and in-hospital mortality. We formed biennial groups to enable comparison, 2010–2011, 2012–2013, 2014–2015 and 2016–2017. ResultsThe incidence of NSTEACS per 100,000 population showed minimal change between 2010 and 2017 (2010: 5.4 per 100,000 and 2017; 4.9 per 100,000). Rates of smoking (2010–11; 58% and 2016–17; 53%), and family history of coronary artery disease (CAD) (2010–11; 51% and 2016–17; 44%) fell, but the proportion of patients from an ethnic minority background (2010–11; 12% and 2016–17; 20%), with diabetes mellitus (DM) (2010–11; 14%, and 2016–17; 18%) and female patients (2010–11; 22% and 2016–17; 24%) increased over the study period. Mortality from NSTEACS remained unchanged (2010–11; 1% and 2016–17; 1%). ConclusionsThe incidence of NSTEACS in patients aged under fifty has not reduced despite reduction in prevalence of risk factors such as smoking hypercholesterolaemia in those admitted to UK hospitals. Despite improved rates of early invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in ‘young’ NSTEACS patients, in-hospital mortality remains unchanged.

Cardiac Troponin, Kidney Function, Heart Failure and Mortality After Myocardial Infarction in Patients With and Without Kidney Impairment

Cardiac troponins (cTn) are routinely measured for the diagnosis and prognosis of myocardial infarction (MI). The relation between troponin levels, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), postinfarction heart failure (HF), and mortality is unclear in patients with kidney impairment. This is a retrospective, cross-sectional study of patients presenting to the Emergency Department at a single tertiary center. Participants presenting with confirmed type I MI from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021, were analyzed from the Myocardial Ischemia National Audit Project database. Main outcomes were acute HF, measured using Killip class, and inpatient mortality. Peak cardiac troponin T (cTnT) level was a secondary outcome. Data on 2,815 patients (67±14years, 28% female) were analyzed. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was used to test for predictors of increasing Killip class. Binary logistic regression was used to test for predictors of inpatient mortality. Analysis of a sub-sample matched for age and diabetes mellitus status showed increased mortality in patients with eGFR <60ml/min/1.73m2 (12.2% vs 4.4%, p<0.001). Multivariate predictors of acute HF included log-transformed peak cTnT, eGFR, body mass index (BMI), and diabetes mellitus status. Multivariate predictors of inpatient mortality included log-transformed peak cTnT, eGFR, age, BMI, and Killip class 3/4. On multivariate analysis, eGFR, ST-elevation MI diagnosis, BMI, male gender, diabetes mellitus status, and hypertension were all predictive of peak cTnT after MI. In conclusion, peak cTnT level and eGFR at presentation after MI are independent predictors of acute HF severity and death in patients with and without kidney impairment.

Socioeconomic disparities in the management and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction

BackgroundPatients from lower socioeconomic status areas have poorer outcomes following acute myocardial infarction (AMI); however, how ethnicity modifies such socioeconomic disparities is unclear.MethodsUsing the UK Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project...

Trends in ST-elevation myocardial infarction hospitalization among young adults: a binational analysis.

ST-segment myocardial infarction (STEMI) is typically associated with increased age, but there is an important group of patients who suffer from STEMI under the age of 50 who are not well characterized in studies. We analysed results from Myocardial Ischemia National Audit Project (MINAP) from the United Kingdom (UK) between 2010 and 2017 and the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from the United States of America (USA) between 2010 and 2018. After exclusion criteria, there were 32 719 STEMI patients aged≤50 from MINAP, and 238 952 patients' ≤50 from the NIS. We analysed temporal trends in demographics, management, and mortality. The proportion of females increased, 15.6% (2010-2012) to 17.6% (2016-2017) (UK) and 22.8% (2010-2012) to 23.1% (2016-2018) (USA). The proportion of white patients decreased, from 86.7% (2010) to 79.1% (2017) (UK) and 72.1% (2010) to 67.1% (2017) (USA). Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) rates increased in UK (2010-2012: 89.0%, 2016-2017: 94.3%), while decreased in USA (2010-2012: 88.9%, 2016-2018: 86.2% (USA). After adjusting for baseline characteristics and management strategies, there was no difference in all-cause mortality in the UK in 2016-2017 compared to 2010-2012 (OR:1.21, 95% CI:0.60-2.40), but there was a decrease in the USA in 2016-2018 compared to 2010-2012 (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.79-0.90). The demographics of young STEMI patients have temporally changed in the UK and USA, with increased proportions of females and ethnic minorities. There was a significant increase in the frequency of diabetes mellitus over the respective time periods in both countries.

Ethnic Disparities in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Outcomes and Processes of Care in Patients With and Without Standard Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Trials suggest patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) without 'standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors' (SMuRFs) have poorer outcomes, but the role of ethnicity has not been investigated. We analyzed 118,177 STEMI patients using the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) registry. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were analyzed using hierarchical logistic regression models; patients with ≥1 SMuRF (n = 88,055) were compared with 'SMuRFless' patients (n = 30,122), with subgroup analysis comparing outcomes of White and Ethnic minority patients. SMuRFless patients had higher incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (odds ratio, OR: 1.09, 95% CI 1.02-1.16) and in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.18) after adjusting for demographics, Killip classification, cardiac arrest, and comorbidities. When additionally adjusting for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and revascularisation (percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafts surgery (CABG)), results for in-hospital mortality were no longer significant (OR 1.05, 95% CI .97-1.13). There were no significant differences in outcomes according to ethnicity. Ethnic minority patients were more likely to undergo revascularisation with ≥1 SMuRF (88 vs 80%, P < .001) or SMuRFless (87 vs 77%, P < .001. Ethnic minority patients were more likely undergo ICA and revascularisation regardless of SMuRF status.

Comparison of care and outcomes for myocardial infarction by heart failure status between United Kingdom and Japan.

Prognosis for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is worse when heart failure is present on admission. Understanding clinical practice in different health systems can identify areas for quality improvement initiatives to improve outcomes. In the absence of international comparison studies, we aimed to compare treatments and in-hospital outcomes of patients admitted with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) by heart failure status in two healthcare-wide cohorts. We used two nationwide databases to capture admissions with STEMI in the United Kingdom (Myocardial ischemia National Audit Project, MINAP) and Japan (Japanese Registry of All Cardiac and Vascular Diseases-Diagnostic Procedure Combination, JROAD-DPC) between 2012 and 2017. Participants were stratified using the HF Killip classification into three groups; Killip 1: no congestive heart failure, Killip 2-3: congestive heart failure, Killip 4: cardiogenic shock. We calculated crude rate and case mix standardized risk ratios (CSRR) for use of treatments and in-hospital death. Patients were younger in the United Kingdom (65.4 [13.6] vs. 69.1 [13.0] years) and more likely to have co-morbidities in the United Kingdom except for diabetes and hypertension. Japan had a higher percentage of heart failure and cardiogenic shock patients among STEMI during admission than that in the United Kingdom. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) rates were lower in the United Kingdom compared with Japan, especially for patients presenting with Killip 2-3 class heart failure (pPCI use in patients with Killip 1, 2-3, 4: Japan, 86.2%, 81.7%, 78.7%; United Kingdom, 79.6%, 58.2% and 79.9%). In contrast, beta-blocker use was consistently lower in Japan than in the United Kingdom (61.4% vs. 90.2%) across Killip classifications and length of hospital stay longer (17.0 [9.7] vs. 5.0 [7.4] days). The crude rate of in-hospital mortality increased with increasing Killip class group. Both the crude rate and CSRR was higher in the United Kingdom compared with Japan for Killip 2-3 (15.8% vs. 6.4%, CSRR 1.80 95% CI 1.73-1.87, P<0.001), and similar for Killip 4 (36.9% vs. 36.3%, CSRR 1.11 95% CI 1.08-1.13, P<0.001). Important differences in the care and outcomes for STEMI with heart failure exist between the United Kingdom and Japan. Specifically, in the United Kingdom, there was a lower rate of pPCI, and in Japan, fewer patients were prescribed beta blockers and hospital length of stay was longer. This international comparison can inform targeted quality improvement programmes to narrow the outcome gap between health systems.

PS-BPC12-6: ASSESSMENT OF LDL CONTROL IN POST-ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME PATIENTS: STATINS ARE NOT ENOUGH

Objective: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, with nearly 18 million people dying from CVD in 2019. In the UK, CVD was responsible for the premature deaths of nearly 170,000 people with around 65,000 being attributed to acute coronary syndrome (ACS). High levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) is one of the main risk factors associated with ACS. A recent European guideline has set out a target for secondary prevention in ACS patients of a LDL &lt; 1.4 mmol/l and 50% or more reduction from baseline. This study seeks to identify the proportion of patients meeting the LDL reduction target for secondary prevention and also to assess whether there are other alternative treatments that are more effective in achieving satisfactory lipid control. Design and Methods: The Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) database was used to identify patients admitted into the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (UHL) between May 2017 and May 2018. The MINAP database records information on how patients admitted into hospital with ACS are cared for. 694 patients were identified. Hospital records were reviewed at 6 months post discharge to determine medications prescribed on discharge and LDL levels. The study was part of a quality improvement project to optimise lipids in patients with ACS (UHL internal audit number 9397). Results: This study found that 97.5% of patients were prescribed a statin upon discharge, which is marginally higher than the national average of 96.4%. 83.4% of patients were discharged with a high-intensity statin as recommended by national guidelines. However only 37.6% of patients reached a LDL level of below 1.4 mmol/l at follow-up. Furthermore of those patients with a baseline LDL prior to or during the myocardial infarction related admission, only 25.1% of patients also achieved a LDL reduction of 50% or more. Patients that were prescribed Ezetimibe showed a slightly better reduction in LDL with 57.1% of patients achieving a LDL level of below 1.4 mmol/l at follow-up and 28.6% of them also achieving a LDL reduction of 50% or more. Conclusions: This study suggests that patients are not achieving a reduction in their LDL levels to &lt; 1.4 mmol/l and 50% or more reduction from baseline despite the majority of patients being prescribed a high-intensity statin as recommended by national guidelines. Therefore there may be a need for the most high risk of patients being offered Ezetimibe in addition to ensure LDL reduction targets are reached.

Women Are Less Likely to Survive AMI Presenting With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Nationwide Study

ObjectiveTo assess the impact of patient’s sex on outcomes and management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients presenting with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Patients and MethodsWe conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study in AMI patients admitted with OHCA between 2010 and 2017 from the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) registry. We used multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate the role of sex as a predictor of clinical outcomes and treatment strategy. ResultsOf 16,278 patients, women constituted almost one-quarter of the population (n=3710 [22.7%]). Women were older (median age 69 [IQR, 57-79] years vs 63 [IQR, 54-72] years, P<.001), experienced longer call-to-hospital-arrival time (median, 1.2 hours vs 1.1 hours; P=.008), were less likely to present with shockable rhythm (86.8% vs 91.5%, P<.001), and less likely to receive dual antiplatelet therapy (73.8% vs 78.6%, P<.001), beta blockers (64.7% vs 72.3%, P<.001), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (49.0% vs 55.3%, P<.001), coronary angiography (73.7% vs 83.3%, P<.001), and percutaneous coronary intervention (37.5% vs. 40.7%, p 0.004). After adjusting for patient characteristics and management, women had significantly higher odds of in-hospital death compared with men (odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.5) and lower odds of receiving coronary angiography (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.75) and coronary artery bypass graft (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.40). ConclusionWomen were less likely to survive following OHCA secondary to AMI. Hospital protocols that minimize physician bias and improve women-physician communication are needed to close this gap.

Interventions to optimise the outputs of national clinical audits to improve the quality of health care: a multi-method study including RCT

Background National clinical audit programmes aim to improve patient care by reviewing performance against explicit standards and directing action towards areas not meeting those standards. Their impact can be improved by (1) optimising feedback content and format, (2) strengthening audit cycles and (3) embedding randomised trials evaluating different ways of delivering feedback. Objectives The objectives were to (1) develop and evaluate the effects of modifications to feedback on recipient responses, (2) identify ways of strengthening feedback cycles for two national audits and (3) explore opportunities, costs and benefits of national audit participation in a programme of trials. Design An online fractional factorial screening experiment (objective 1) and qualitative interviews (objectives 2 and 3). Setting and participants Participants were clinicians and managers involved in five national clinical audits – the National Comparative Audit of Blood Transfusions, the Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network, the Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project, the Trauma Audit &amp; Research Network and the National Diabetes Audit – (objective 1); and clinicians, members of the public and researchers (objectives 2 and 3). Interventions We selected and developed six online feedback modifications through three rounds of user testing. We randomised participants to one of 32 combinations of the following recommended specific actions: comparators reinforcing desired behaviour change; multimodal feedback; minimised extraneous cognitive load for feedback recipients; short, actionable messages followed by optional detail; and incorporating ‘the patient voice’ (objective 1). Main outcome measures The outcomes were intended actions, including enactment of audit standards (primary outcome), comprehension, user experience and engagement (objective 1). Results For objective 1, the primary analysis included 638 randomised participants, of whom 566 completed the outcome questionnaire. No modification independently increased intended enactment of audit standards. Minimised cognitive load improved comprehension (+0.1; p = 0.014) and plans to bring audit findings to colleagues’ attention (+0.13, on a –3 to +3 scale; p = 0.016). We observed important cumulative synergistic and antagonistic interactions between modifications, participant role and national audit. The analysis in objective 2 included 19 interviews assessing the Trauma Audit Research Network and the National Diabetes Audit. The identified ways of strengthening audit cycles included making performance data easier to understand and guiding action planning. The analysis in objective 3 identified four conditions for effective collaboration from 31 interviews: compromise – recognising capacity and constraints; logistics – enabling data sharing, audit quality and funding; leadership – engaging local stakeholders; and relationships – agreeing shared priorities and needs. The perceived benefits of collaboration outweighed the risks. Limitations The online experiment assessed intended enactment as a predictor of actual clinical behaviour. Interviews and surveys were subject to social desirability bias. Conclusions National audit impacts may be enhanced by strengthening all aspects of feedback cycles, particularly effective feedback, and considering how different ways of reinforcing feedback act together. Future work Embedded randomised trials evaluating different ways of delivering feedback within national clinical audits are acceptable and may offer efficient, evidence-based and cumulative improvements in outcomes. Trial registration This trial is registered as ISRCTN41584028. Funding details This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 10, No. 15. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.