Myasthenia Gravis Activities Of Daily Living Research Articles

Post-hoc analyses from the ADAPT clinical study demonstrate aggregate sustained benefit of Efgartigimod in generalized myasthenia gravis

ObjectivesThis post-hoc analysis evaluates the long-term efficacy of efgartigimod versus placebo in adult patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) with acetylcholine-receptor autoantibodies (AChR-Ab+), based on data from the ADAPT RCT and its open-label extension ADAPT+. MethodsChanges from baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) and Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scores were assessed by treatment group over the ADAPT (up to 20 weeks) and ADAPT+ time horizon (extended to 64 weeks for efgartigimod group patients). Response to treatment was defined as (Meriggioli, 2009 [3])5-point reduction in QMG or (Meriggioli, 2009 [3])3-point reduction in MG-ADL vs. baseline values. ResultsAChR-Ab+ patients treated with efgartigimod spent a substantially greater percentage of time in response in ADAPT based on at least a 5-point change in QMG compared to the placebo group (44 % versus 13 % respectively, p = 0.0034). Analyses based on a 3-point change in MG-ADL in ADAPT showed the percentage of time in response was nearly double for efgartigimod versus placebo (59 % versus 30 % respectively, p = 0.010). These trends were also maintained using different response definitions, as well as in patients with and without prior immune therapy exposure and by time from diagnosis (<7 years versus ≥7 years). ConclusionsThe clinical benefit of efgartigimod was sustained over repeat treatment cycles and maintained over the long term. Response to treatment was consistent regardless of response definition and was repeated in different patient subgroups. Overall, the results of this analysis indicate that efgartigimod is an effective therapeutic option, demonstrating a robust benefit among AChR-Ab+ patients with gMG.

Risk-Benefit Analysis of Novel Treatments for Patients with Generalized Myasthenia Gravis.

This study used network meta-analysis (NMA) to inform and compare the number needed to treat (NNT), number needed to harm (NNH), and cost per improved outcome (CPIO) associated with more recently approved treatments for anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (anti-AChR Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). Clinical trials of neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) inhibitors, efgartigimod intravenous (IV) and rozanolixizumab, and complement inhibitors, ravulizumab and zilucoplan, versus placebo (with background conventional treatment) were included in the primary NMA to compare efficacy and safety outcomes. The outputs from the NMAs were used to estimate NNT and NNH of each treatment versus placebo. CPIO (2024 USD) was estimated for a≥3- or≥5-point reduction from baseline in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) and Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) scores. Sensitivity analyses were performed adding efgartigimod PH20 subcutaneous (SC) and eculizumab to the NMA. Efgartigimod IV had the lowest NNT versus placebo for achieving a≥3- and≥5-point reduction in QMG, as well as a≥5-point reduction in MG-ADL, whereas rozanolixizumab had the lowest NNT for a≥3-point reduction in MG-ADL. The NNH versus placebo was similar across comparator treatments. Efgartigimod IV had the lowest CPIO among all treatments for all assessed efficacy outcomes. Sensitivity analyses yielded results consistent with primary analysis and indicated that efgartigimod PH20 SC had comparable NNT and CPIO values to efgartigimod IV, whereas eculizumab had comparable NNT and higher CPIO values compared to other complement inhibitors. FcRn inhibitors and complement inhibitors assessed in this study all demonstrated clinical benefit in terms of NNT as well as an acceptable safety profile in terms of NNH. Within the limitations of this meta-analysis, efgartigimod was associated with a favorable benefit-risk profile as well as a better economic value compared to ravulizumab, rozanolixizumab, and zilucoplan as treatments for anti-AChR Ab+gMG.

Time to response with ravulizumab, a long-acting terminal complement inhibitor, in adults with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis.

The efficacy and safety of ravulizumab, a terminal complement C5 inhibitor, in adults with anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) were demonstrated in the CHAMPION MG study (NCT03920293). This analysis aimed to characterize the latency to onset of a clinically meaningful therapeutic effect for ravulizumab. Post hoc analysis of data collected for up to 60 weeks from CHAMPION MG was performed to assess the timing of response to ravulizumab. Response was analyzed based on reductions of ≥2 and ≥3 points (minimal clinically important differences [MCIDs]) in Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) total scores, respectively, and on more rigorous reductions of ≥3 and ≥5 points, respectively. Time to first response was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. The median (95% confidence interval) time to first response was 2.1 (2.1-2.6) and 4.1 (2.3-10.0) weeks for reductions of ≥2 and ≥3 points in MG-ADL total score, respectively (n = 139), and 4.1 (2.1-10.0) and 18.3 (11.0-33.4) weeks for reductions of ≥3 and ≥5 points in QMG total score, respectively (n = 134). Cumulative response rates at Week 60 (data cut-off) were 88% and 82% for ≥2- and ≥3-point MG-ADL score reductions, respectively, and 86% and 59% for ≥3- and ≥5-point QMG score reductions, respectively. The median times to MCID with ravulizumab treatment in patients with AChR Ab+ gMG were ~2 weeks and ~4 weeks based on MCID MG-ADL and QMG total score reductions, respectively.

Subcutaneous efgartigimod PH20 in generalized myasthenia gravis: A phase 3 randomized noninferiority study (ADAPT-SC) and interim analyses of a long-term open-label extension study (ADAPT-SC+)

ADAPT-SC (NCT04735432) was designed to evaluate noninferiority of subcutaneous (SC) efgartigimod PH20 to intravenous (IV) efgartigimod in participants with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). ADAPT-SC+ (NCT04818671) is an open-label extension study designed to assess long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of efgartigimod PH20 SC. Adult participants in ADAPT-SC were randomly assigned to receive a treatment cycle of 4 once-weekly administrations of efgartigimod PH20 SC 1000 ​mg or efgartigimod IV 10 ​mg/kg, followed by 7 weeks of follow-up. Primary endpoint was percentage change from baseline in total immunoglobulin G (IgG) level at week 4 (1 week after the fourth administration). Secondary efficacy endpoints assessed number and percentage of Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) responders and mean change from baseline in total score for each measure. The primary endpoint was met, demonstrating noninferiority in total IgG reduction between efgartigimod PH20 SC 1000 ​mg and efgartigimod IV 10 ​mg/kg. Clinically meaningful improvements were seen as early as 1 week following the first administration in both treatment arms, with maximal improvements at week 4. Continued treatment cycles of efgartigimod PH20 SC in ADAPT-SC+ have demonstrated long-term safety and consistent improvements in MG-ADL total score. Findings from ADAPT-SC and ADAPT-SC+ demonstrate similar safety and efficacy as observed in the placebo-controlled ADAPT study. Collectively, these findings support noninferiority between efgartigimod PH20 SC 1000 ​mg and efgartigimod IV 10 ​mg/kg, as well as long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of efgartigimod PH20 SC for treatment of a broad population of patients with gMG.

A real-life experience with eculizumab and efgartigimod in generalized myasthenia gravis patients

IntroductionEculizumab, a complement active antibody, and efgartigimod, an Fc fragment that blocks neonatal Fc receptor, are both approved to treat generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) patients. The objective of this study is to describe the clinical response to both treatments in a real-life setting.MethodsWe collected baseline and follow-up clinical data using the Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG). We included 63 patients, 32 treated with eculizumab and 31 with efgartigimod. Of the efgartigimod-treated patients, 22 were anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR-Ab +) and 9 were AChR-Ab- (3 MuSK-Ab + and 6 seronegative).ResultsBoth treatments showed similar efficacy relative to the MG-ADL scale reduction (p = 0.237). Efgartigimod had a similar effect on both AChR-Ab + and AChR-Ab- (p = 0.280). Eculizumab was superior to efgartigimod relative to the QMG score reduction for the entire dataset (p = 0.003) and was more likely to achieve a clinical response at the QMG compared to efgartigimod (OR 1.373; p = 0.016). Steroid-sparing effect was higher for eculizumab than efgartigimod ( – 16.7 vs – 5.2 mg of the baseline daily dose at follow-up; p = 0.001). Mean speed of prednisone reduction was – 13.1 mg of the daily dose for each month of follow-up for eculizumab-treated patients and – 3.2 for efgartigimod (p = 0.001). We found three serious events, all not related to treatment in the investigator’s opinion. One eculizumab-treated patient experienced a severe pneumonia and died despite treatment.ConclusionsOur study provides evidence that eculizumab and efgartigimod can be used in clinical practice to reduce disability in gMG patients. Eculizumab-treated patients had a higher QMG response and steroid sparing effect. Efgartigimod may offer a more flexible schedule due to its cyclical use, no need for vaccination, and efficacy in AChR-Ab- patients.

United States clinical practice experience with eculizumab in myasthenia gravis: symptoms, function, and immunosuppressant therapy use

Background/objectivesThe phase 3 REGAIN study and its open-label extension demonstrated the efficacy of the complement C5 inhibitor eculizumab in patients with treatment-refractory, acetylcholine receptor antibody–positive generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). The aim of the ELEVATE study was to assess the effectiveness of eculizumab in clinical practice in adults with MG in the United States.MethodsA retrospective chart review was conducted in adults with MG who initiated eculizumab treatment between October 23, 2017 and December 31, 2019. Outcomes assessed before and during eculizumab treatment using a pre- versus post-treatment study design included Myasthenia Gravis–Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) total scores; minimal symptom expression (MSE); physician impression of clinical change; minimal manifestation status (MMS); and concomitant medication use.ResultsIn total, 119 patients were included in the study. A significant reduction was observed in mean MG-ADL total score, from 8.0 before eculizumab initiation to 5.4 at 3 months and to 4.7 at 24 months after eculizumab initiation (both p < 0.001). At 24 months after eculizumab initiation, MSE was achieved by 19% of patients. MMS or better was achieved by 30% of patients at 24 months. Additionally, 64% of patients receiving prednisone at eculizumab initiation had their prednisone dosage reduced during eculizumab treatment and 13% discontinued prednisone; 32% were able to discontinue nonsteroidal immunosuppressant therapy.DiscussionEculizumab treatment was associated with sustained improvements in MG-ADL total scores through 24 months in adults with MG. Prednisone dosage was reduced in approximately two-thirds of patients, suggesting a steroid-sparing effect for eculizumab.

Efgartigimod for generalized myasthenia gravis: A multicenter real-world cohort study in China.

Efgartigimod, a neonatal Fc receptor antagonist, facilitates antibody degradation including pathogenic IgGs. The ADAPT study demonstrated the tolerability and efficacy of efgartigimod in the treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). However, very limited evidence is available for the Chinese population, and it remains inconclusive about which kind of patients are selected to preferentially receive efgartigimod in real-world settings. This multicenter cohort study included gMG patients treated at 14 neuromuscular reference centers in China. The Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score, immunosuppressants, and the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were prospectively collected. Of the 1640 gMG admitted between September and December 2023, 61 (3.7%) received efgartigimod for at least one treatment cycle. Among them, 56 cases (92%) were anti-AChR antibody-positive, 4 were anti-MuSK antibody-positive, and 1 was seronegative. Thymoma-associated myasthenia gravis accounted for most cases (44%, 27 out of 61). The principal causes of efgartigimod initiation included MG acute exacerbation (MGAE) (48%, 29 out of 61) and myasthenic crisis (MC) (15%, 9 out of 61). Clinically meaningful improvement was rapidly achieved in 97% (58 out of 61) of patients at 1.3 ± 0.7 weeks. By week 12, the MG-ADL score reduced to 3.8 ± 4.1 (baseline:10.5 ± 5.2) for all participants, while it reduced to 4.0 ± 4.7 for MGAE and 3.8 ± 4.2 for MC, respectively. All but one TMG patient required no additional rescue therapies after efgartigimod initiation. 11.5% (7 out of 61) reported ≥1 TEAEs. This multicenter cohort study demonstrated the efficacy of efgartigimod in rapid control of gMG. Patients with MGAE or MC would benefit from efgartigimod treatment.

Efgartigimod in refractory autoimmune myasthenia gravis.

Efgartigimod, a neonatal Fc-receptor inhibitor, has recently been approved as treatment for myasthenia gravis (MG). In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to systematically assess short- and long-term effectiveness of efgartigimod in patients with refractory MG. Sixteen patients with refractory autoimmune acetylcholine receptor MG were treated with efgartigimod. Data were collected from January 2021 to March 2023 on Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis score (QMG), Myasthenia Gravis Composite score (MGC) and the 15-item revised version of the Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life questionnaire (MG-QoL15r). A favorable outcome was seen in 56% of patients at the last measurement. Out of 16 patients, 50% were an MG-ADL responder after the first treatment cycle. After 4 weeks, a clinically meaningful improvement compared to baseline was seen on the MG-ADL, QMG, and MGC. There was a statistically significant improvement on the MGQoL15r from baseline to week 4. The improvement was maintained until the last measurement for the MGC and the MGQoL15r. At the last visit, all patients had discontinued 4-weekly dosages, shifting to administration frequencies of 1, 2, or 3 weeks. Drug doses could be decreased for prednisolone (n = 7), azathioprine (n = 2), and intravenous immunoglobulin (n = 9). Frequency of plasma exchange was decreased in nine patients. In patients with refractory MG, efgartigimod was effective for at least half of all patients. Patients required more frequent dosing compared to the ADAPT phase 3 trial. In 80% of the patients concurrent medication could be reduced or discontinued.

Ravulizumab use for acetylcholine receptor-positive generalized myasthenia gravis in clinical practice.

To describe the early experience of ravulizumab use in acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (AChR+ve gMG). This multicenter retrospective study included AChR+ve gMG patients who were treated with ravulizumab and had both pre- and post-ravulizumab myasthenia gravis activities of daily living (MG-ADL) scores. Clinical information regarding MG history, concomitant treatment(s), MG-ADL, other MG-specific measures, and adverse events were recorded. A total of 18 patients with mean age of 61.83 (±16.08, n = 18) years were included in this cohort. In 10 complement inhibitor naive patients, a clinically meaningful reduction in mean Mg-ADL (baseline: 6.6 (±3.58) vs. 4.4 (±2.28), post ravulizumab) was seen. 6 out of 10 patients (60%) had clinically meaningful reduction post ravulizumab and two achieved minimum symptom expression (MSE). In 8 patients switched from eculizumab to ravulizumab, further reduction was noted in post ravulizumab mean MG-ADL (Baseline: 3.25 (±3.34) vs. 1.5 (±2.34) post ravulizumab). None of the patients who switched from eculizumab to ravulizumab experienced worsening symptoms. Eleven out of 14 (78.5%) patients on prednisone therapy were able to reduce their prednisone dose post-ravulizumab. None of the patients experienced any major side effects. In our clinical practice, 60% of AChR+ve gMG complement inhibitor naive patients experienced a clinically meaningful improvement in MG-ADL scores with ravulizumab. Patients were safely switched from eculizumab to ravulizumab and had further improvement in their mean MG-ADL scores. Of those on prednisone therapy, the majority were able to reduce their prednisone dosage.

Short-term changes in serum miRNA levels and patient-reported clinical outcomes in myasthenia gravis.

The circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) miR-150-5p, miR-30e-5p, and miR-21-5p have been suggested as potential biomarkers for myasthenia gravis (MG); however, the relationships between short-term natural changes of the miRNAs and patient-reported MG outcome scores have not been well-studied. We assessed the short-term fluctuations in miRNA levels and patient-reported outcome measures in MG. This prospective cohort study included 39 MG patients with regular follow-ups and unchanged medications at the Neurology outpatient clinic at Uppsala University Hospital. Patients had weekly follow-up visits for 1 month, at which blood samples were drawn, and scores from MG activities of daily living (MG-ADL), MG quality-of-life-15 (MG-QoL15), and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) were assessed. Serum levels of miRNA miR-150-5p, miR-30e-5p, and miR-21-5p were analyzed using quantitative real-time PCR. Intra-individual levels of miR-30e-5p and miR-150-5p were stable, whereas a significant reduction in miR-21-5p was observed from week 1 to week 2 (p = .0024) and from week 2 to week 3 (p < .0001). There were intra-individual differences over a short time in MG-ADL, with higher scores in female patients (p = .0281) and a significant reduction from the first to the second weeks (p = .0281), whereas MG-QoL15 and FSS scores were stable. The suggested MG biomarkers miR-30e-5p and miR-150-5p were more stable than miR-21-5p over a short time, indicating their short-term stability as biomarkers. Prospective multi-center studies with longer periods of follow-up and matched controls are needed to validate these miRNAs as biomarkers in MG.

Efgartigimod and Ravulizumab for Treating Acetylcholine Receptor Auto-antibody-Positive (AChR-Ab+) Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Indirect Treatment Comparison.

Efgartigimod and ravulizumab, both approved for treating acetylcholine receptor auto-antibody-positive (AChR-Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG), have not been directly compared. This paper assessed comparative effects of efgartigimod vs. ravulizumab for treating adults with AChR-Ab+gMG using indirect treatment comparison methods. The matching-adjusted indirect comparison used data from two randomized trials of adult men and women. The ADAPT (efgartigimod vs. placebo; individual patient data available) population was reweighted to match the CHAMPION (ravulizumab vs. placebo; index study; aggregate data available) population. The relative effect of efgartigimod versus placebo was estimated in this reweighted population and compared with the observed ravulizumab versus placebo effect to estimate the efgartigimod versus ravulizumab effect. The outcomes were Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), QuantitativeMyasthenia Gravis (QMG), and Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15-item-revised scale (MG-QoL15r) assessed as cumulative effect (area under the curve; AUC) over 26 weeks (primary) and change from baseline at 4 weeks and time of best response (week 4 for efgartigimod; week 26 for ravulizumab). For MG-QoL15r, efgartigimod had a statistically significant improvement compared with ravulizumab over 26 weeks [mean difference (95% confidence interval): -52.6 (-103.0, -2.3)], at week 4 [-4.0 (-6.6, -1.4)], and at time of best response [-3.9 (-6.5, -1.3)]. Efgartigimod had a statistically significant improvement over ravulizumab in MG-ADL at week 4 [-1.9 (-3.3, -0.5)] and at time of best response [-1.4 (-2.8, 0.0)] and in QMG at week 4 [-3.2 (-5.2, -1.2)] and at time of best response [-3.0 (-5.0, -1.0)]. For AUC over 26 weeks, improvements were not significantly different between efgartigimod and ravulizumab for MG-ADL [-8.7 (-36.1, 18.8)] and QMG [-13.7 (-50.3, 22.9)]. Efgartigimod may provide a faster and greater improvement over 26 weeks in quality of life than ravulizumab in adults with AChR-Ab+gMG. Efgartigimod showed faster improvements in MG-ADL and QMG than ravulizumab.

Therapeutic Responses to Efgartigimod for Generalized Myasthenia Gravis in Japan.

Efgartigimod, which has been well tolerated and efficacious in individuals with generalized myasthenia gravis (MG), is available in Japan not only for the treatment of anti-acetylcholine receptor-positive (AChR+) but also anti-muscle-specific receptor tyrosine kinase (MuSK+) and seronegative generalized MG. We report details of the use of efgartigimod for generalized MG in clinical practice in Japan. We included patients with generalized MG in the 2021 survey of Japan Myasthenia Gravis Registry (JAMG-R) study group who received an initial cycle of efgartigimod between May and September 2022. We defined "responders" as patients who achieved a score ≥2 points for MG activities of daily living (MG-ADL) in the first treatment cycle. The MG composite and the Revised scale of the 15-item Myasthenia Gravis-Quality of Life scale (MG-QOL15-r) were also evaluated. Of 1,343 JAMG-R patients, 36 (2.7%) started efgartigimod (female 68%, age 53 years). Their serologic profiles were as follows: AChR+, n = 19 (53%); MuSK+, n = 6 (17%); and seronegative, n = 11 (31%). Twenty-six patients (72%) had refractory MG. There were 81 cycles of efgartigimod during the 26-week observation in 34 patients (average, 2.4 cycles). The mean interval between cycles was 5.9 weeks. A continuous 4-weekly infusion of efgartigimod was performed in 65 (80%) of 81 cycles. In the first cycle, the MG-ADL score of the 34 patients decreased significantly from 10.5 ± 4.3 to 6.9 ± 5.1 (p = 0.003). Similarly, the mean MG composite and MG-QOL15-r decreased from 18.4 ± 13.6 to 11.8 ± 9.6 (p = 0.004) and from 19.2 ± 6.3 to 14.2 ± 8.3 (p = 0.007), respectively. Twenty-one (62%) patients were responders. Therapeutic responses were observed in the subsequent cycles. The duration of effectiveness of efgartigimod was varied among the responders; 4 responders had only a single effective cycle. Significant improvement was observed in the MuSK+ patients. Prednisolone dose of 7 patients was reduced. Our examination of the patients' postintervention status revealed that 6 patients achieved minimal manifestations. COVID-19 occurred in 5 patients. We failed to detect clinical or laboratory findings associated with responders. Efgartigimod can be considered for the treatment of patients with generalized MG who do not achieve minimal manifestations, with a broad flexibility of patient selection and treatment schedules.

P.054 Long-term safety and efficacy of zilucoplan in myasthenia gravis: additional interim analyses of RAISE-XT

Background: Zilucoplan, a macrocyclic peptide complement component 5 inhibitor, sustained efficacy for up to 60 weeks of treatment, with a favourable safety profile in patients with acetylcholine receptor autoantibody-positive generalised myasthenia gravis in an interim analysis of RAISE-XT (NCT04225871). We evaluate the safety and efficacy of zilucoplan up to 96 weeks. Methods: RAISE-XT, a Phase 3, multicentre, open-label extension study, included patients who participated in the double-blind Phase 2 (NCT03315130) and Phase 3 (NCT04115293) zilucoplan studies. Patients self-administered daily subcutaneous zilucoplan 0.3mg/kg injections. Primary outcome was incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Secondary outcomes included change from baseline in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score. Results: At data cut-off (11 May 2023), median (range) exposure to zilucoplan was 1.8 (0.11–5.1) years (N=200). TEAEs occurred in 191 (95.5%) patients; the most common TEAE was COVID-19 (n=64; 32.0%). At Week 96, mean (standard error) change in MG-ADL score from double-blind study baseline was –6.33 (0.49) and –7.83 (0.60) for patients who received zilucoplan 0.3mg/kg and placebo in the double-blind studies, respectively. Conclusions: Zilucoplan demonstrated a favourable long-term safety profile. Efficacy was sustained for 96 weeks in patients who had previously received zilucoplan and who switched from placebo.

Eculizumab in Adolescent Patients With Refractory Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: A Phase 3, Open-Label, Multicenter Study

BackgroundThis study evaluated the efficacy and safety of eculizumab, a terminal complement C5 inhibitor, in juvenile generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). MethodsAdolescents aged 12 to 17 years with refractory anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibody-positive gMG received eculizumab (weekly induction [one to two doses of 600 mg or four doses of 900 mg] followed by maintenance doses [300 to 1200 mg] every two weeks for up to 26 weeks) in a phase 3, open-label multicenter study (NCT03759366). Change from baseline to week 26 in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) total score (primary end point) and secondary end points including Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) total score, Myasthenia Gravis Composite score, Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America postintervention status, EuroQol 5-Dimensions (Youth) and Neurological Quality-of-Life Pediatric Fatigue questionnaire scores, as well as pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety, were recorded. ResultsEleven adolescents (mean ± S.D. age 14.8 ± 1.8 years) were enrolled; 10 completed the primary evaluation period. Least-squares mean changes from baseline at week 26 were −5.8 (standard error [SE] 1.2; P = 0.0004) for QMG total score and −2.3 (SE 0.6; P = 0.0017) for MG-ADL total score. Overall, the primary and all secondary efficacy end point analyses met statistical significance from the first assessment and were sustained throughout. Complete terminal complement inhibition was sustained through 26 weeks in all patients. Treatment-emergent adverse events were all mild/moderate and predominantly unrelated to eculizumab. ConclusionsEculizumab was effective in reducing disease burden and was well tolerated in adolescents with refractory AChR antibody-positive gMG.

COVID-19 in patients with myasthenia gravis: a single-center retrospective study in China.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a great concern since 2019. Patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) may be at higher risk of COVID-19 and a more severe disease course. We examined the associations between COVID-19 and MG. This single-center retrospective cohort study involved 134 patients who were diagnosed with MG from June 2020 to November 2022 and followed up until April 2023. They were divided into a COVID-19 group and non-COVID-19 group. Logistic regression analysis was used to detect factors potentially associating COVID-19 with MG. Of the 134 patients with MG, 108 (80.6%) had COVID-19. A higher number of comorbidities was significantly associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 (p = 0.040). A total of 103 patients (95.4%) had mild/moderate COVID-19 symptoms, and 4 patients (3.7%) were severe/critical symptoms (including 2 deaths). Higher age (p = 0.036), use of rituximab (p = 0.037), tumors other than thymoma (p = 0.031), Hashimoto's thyroiditis (p = 0.011), more comorbidities (p = 0.002), and a higher baseline MG activities of daily living (MG-ADL) score (p = 0.006) were risk factors for severe COVID-19 symptoms. The MG-ADL score increased by ≥ 2 points in 16 (15.7%) patients. Dry cough and/or expectoration (p = 0.011), use of oral corticosteroids (p = 0.033), and use of more than one kind of immunosuppressant (p = 0.017) were associated with the increase of the post-COVID-19 MG-ADL score. Most patients with MG have a mild course of COVID-19. However, patients with older age, many comorbidities, a high MG-ADL score, and use of a variety of immunosuppressants during COVID-19 may be more prone to severe symptoms.

Systemic Inflammatory Response Index, a Potential Inflammatory Biomarker in Disease Severity of Myasthenia Gravis: A Pilot Retrospective Study.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic autoimmune disease caused by neuromuscular junction (NMJ) dysfunction. Our current understanding of MG's inflammatory component remains poor. The systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) presents a promising yet unexplored biomarker for assessing MG severity. This study aimed to investigate the potential relationship between SIRI and MG disease severity. We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical data from 171 MG patients admitted between January 2016 and June 2021. Patients with incomplete data, other autoimmune diseases, or comorbidities were excluded. Disease severity was evaluated using the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) classification and Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) on admission. The association between SIRI and disease severity was assessed through logistic regression analysis, along with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) comparisons with established inflammation indicators. After exclusion, 143 patients were analyzed in our study. SIRI levels significantly differed between patients with higher and lower disease severity (p < 0.001). Univariate logistic regression showed that SIRI had a significant effect on high disease severity (OR = 1.376, 95% CI 1.138-1.664, p = 0.001). This association remained significant even after adjusting for age, sex, disease duration, history of MG medication and thymoma (OR = 1.308, 95% CI 1.072-1.597, p = 0.008). Additionally, a positive correlation between SIRI and MG-ADL was observed (r = 0.232, p = 0.008). Significant interactions were observed between SIRI and immunosuppressor (p interaction = 0.001) and intravenous immunoglobulin (p interaction = 0.005). DCA demonstrated the superior net clinical benefit of SIRI compared to other markers when the threshold probability was around 0.2. Our findings indicate a strong independent association between SIRI and disease severity in MG, suggesting SIRI's potential as a valuable biomarker for MG with superior clinical benefit to currently utilized markers.

Batoclimab vs Placebo for Generalized Myasthenia Gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is caused by autoantibodies that disrupt the neuromuscular junction. The neonatal fragment crystallizable receptor (FcRn) antagonists, efgartigimod and rozanolixizumab, reduce immunoglobulin G (IgG) level in the circulation and alleviate symptoms in patients with generalized MG. To examine the efficacy and safety profile of batoclimab, a monoclonal IgG1 antibody, in patients with generalized MG. This was a multicenter randomized clinical trial conducted from September 15, 2021, to June 29, 2022, at 27 centers in China. Adult patients 18 years or older with generalized MG were screened, and those who were antibody positive were enrolled. Eligible patients received batoclimab or matching placebo in addition to standard of care. Each treatment cycle consisted of 6 weekly subcutaneous injections of batoclimab, 680 mg, or matching placebo followed by 4 weeks of observation. A second treatment cycle was conducted in patients who required continuing treatment. The primary outcome was sustained improvement, as defined by a 3-point or greater reduction in the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score from baseline for 4 or more consecutive weeks in the first cycle in individuals who were positive for acetylcholine receptor or muscle-specific kinase antibodies. A total of 178 adult patients with generalized MG were screened, 132 were randomly assigned, 131 tested positive for antibodies, and 1 tested negative for antibodies. A total of 132 patients (mean [SE] age, 43.8 [13.6] years; 88 women [67.2%]) were enrolled. The rate of sustained MG-ADL improvement in the first cycle in antibody-positive patients was 31.3% (20 of 64) in the placebo group vs 58.2% (39 of 67) in the batoclimab group (odds ratio, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.62-7.35; P = .001). The MG-ADL score diverged between the 2 groups as early as week 2. The mean (SE) maximum difference in MG-ADL score reduction occurred 1 week after the last dose (day 43, 1.7 [0.3] in the placebo group vs 3.6 [0.3] in the batoclimab group; group difference, -1.9; 95% CI, -2.8 to -1.0; nominal P < .001). The rates of treatment-related and severe treatment-emergent adverse events in patients were 36.9% (24 of 65) and 7.7% (5 of 65) in the placebo group vs 70.1% (47 of 67) and 3.0% (2 of 67) in the batoclimab group, respectively. Batoclimab increased the rate of sustained MG-ADL improvement and was well tolerated in adult patients with generalized MG. Clinical effects and the extent of IgG reduction were similar to those previously reported for efgartigimod and rozanolixizumab. Future studies of large sample size are needed to further understand the safety profile of batoclimab. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05039190.

The efficacy and safety of FcRn inhibitors in patients with myasthenia gravis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease that causes local or generalized muscle weakness. Complement inhibitors and targeting of the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) to block IgG cycling are two novel and successful mechanisms. PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published before May 18, 2023. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to assess the data. We pooled 532 participants from six randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Compared to the placebo, the FcRn inhibitors were more efficacy in Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) (MD = - 1.69 [- 2.35, - 1.03], P < 0.00001), MG-ADL responder (RR = 2.01 [1.62, 2.48], P < 0.00001), Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) (MD = - 2.45 [- 4.35, - 0.55], P = 0.01), Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC) (MD = - 2.97 [- 4.27, - 1.67], P < 0.00001), 15-item revised version of the Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life (MGQoL15r) (MD = - 2.52 [- 3.54, - 1.50], P < 0.00001), without increasing the risk of safety. The subgroup analysis showed that efgartigimod was more effective than placebo in MG-ADL responders. Rozanolixizumab was more effective than the placebo except in QMG, and batoclimab was more effective than the placebo except in MG-ADL responder. Nipocalizumab did not show satisfactory efficacy in all outcomes. With the exception of rozanolixizumab, all drugs showed non-inferior safety profiles to placebo. FcRn inhibitors have good efficacy and safety in patients with MG. Among them, efgartigimod and nipocalimab were effective without causing an increased safety risk. Rozanolixizumab, despite its superior efficacy, caused an increased incidence of adverse events. Current evidence does not suggest that nipocalimab is effective in patients with MG.

Efficacy of ravulizumab in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis by time from diagnosis: A post hoc subgroup analysis of the CHAMPION MG study.

The CHAMPION MG study demonstrated that ravulizumab significantly improved Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) total scores versus placebo in adults with acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive generalized myasthenia gravis (AChR+ gMG). This post hoc analysis aimed to assess these outcomes by time from MG diagnosis. Changes from baseline to week 26 in MG-ADL and QMG total scores were analyzed by time from MG diagnosis to study entry (≤2 vs. >2 years). Within each subgroup, least-squares (LS) mean changes for ravulizumab and placebo were compared using mixed models for repeated measures. In ravulizumab-treated patients, differences in LS mean (standard error of the mean) changes from baseline to week 26 were not statistically significant in the ≤2-years subgroup versus the >2-years subgroup for MG-ADL (-4.3 [0.70] vs. -2.9 [0.37]; p = .0511) or QMG (-4.3 [0.94] vs. -2.5 [0.50]; p = .0822) scores. No clear trends were observed in the placebo group. LS mean changes from baseline were significantly greater for ravulizumab versus placebo in both the ≤2 and >2 years from diagnosis subgroups for MG-ADL and QMG scores (all p < .05). The difference in treatment effect between the ≤2-years and >2-years subgroups was not statistically significant. No clinically meaningful between-subgroup differences in treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in ravulizumab-treated patients. Ravulizumab treatment improved clinical outcomes for patients with AChR+ gMG regardless of time from diagnosis. A numerical trend was observed favoring greater treatment effect with earlier versus later treatment after diagnosis. Further studies are required for confirmation.

Long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of efgartigimod (ADAPT+): interim results from a phase 3 open-label extension study in participants with generalized myasthenia gravis.

ADAPT+ assessed the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of efgartigimod in adult participants with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). ADAPT+ was an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, up to 3-year extension of the pivotal phase 3 ADAPT study. Efgartigimod was administered in treatment cycles of 4 intravenous infusions (one 10 mg/kg infusion per week). Initiation of subsequent treatment cycles was individualized based on clinical evaluation. Safety endpoints included incidence and severity of adverse events. Efficacy endpoints assessed disease severity using Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores. As of January 2022, 151 participants had rolled over to ADAPT+ and 145 had received ≥1 dose of efgartigimod, of whom, 111 (76.6%) were AChR-Ab+ and 34 (23.4%) were AChR-Ab-. Mean study duration (treatment plus follow-up) was 548 days, and participants received up to 17 treatment cycles, corresponding to 217.6 participant-years of exposure. In the overall population, 123 (84.8%) participants reported ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event; most frequent were headache (36 [24.8%]), COVID-19 (22 [15.2%]), and nasopharyngitis (20 [13.8%]). Clinically meaningful improvement (CMI) in mean MG-ADL and QMG scores was seen as early as 1 week following the first infusion across multiple cycles in AChR-Ab+ and AChR-Ab- participants. Maximal MG-ADL and QMG improvements aligned with onset and magnitude of total IgG and AChR-Ab reductions. For AChR-Ab+ participants at any time point in each of the first 10 treatment cycles, more than 90% had a maximum reduction of ≥2 points (CMI) in MG-ADL total score; across the 7 cycles in which QMG was measured, 69.4% to 91.3% of participants demonstrated a maximum reduction of ≥3 points (CMI) in QMG total score. Many participants demonstrated improvements well beyond CMI thresholds. In AChR-Ab+ participants with ≥1 year of combined follow-up between ADAPT and ADAPT+, mean number of annualized cycles was 4.7 per year (median [range] 5.0 [0.5-7.6]). Results of ADAPT+ corroborate the substantial clinical improvements seen with efgartigimod in ADAPT and support its long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy, as well as an individualized dosing regimen for treatment of gMG. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03770403, NCT03770403.