Muscle-sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Research Articles

Abdominal function and appearance of patients after repairing the extensive skin and soft tissue defects in the limbs with two types of lower abdominal tissue flaps

Objective: To study the abdominal function and appearance of patients after repairing the extensive skin and soft tissue defects in the limbs with two types of lower abdominal tissue flaps. Methods: A retrospective clinical controlled study was conducted. From June 2016 to October 2022, 17 patients with extensive skin and soft tissue defects in the limbs who met the inclusion criteria were admitted to the Department of Bone Hand Microsurgery of Shandong Wendeng Orthopedic Hospital, including 2 males and 15 females, aged 21-60 years, with a defect ranging from 15.0 cm×10.0 cm to 23.0 cm×15.0 cm. According to the applied repair method, the patients were divided into deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap group (9 cases) with the defect wound being repaired by the DIEP flap and muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) flap group (8 cases) with the defect wound being repaired by the MS-TRAM flap. On post surgery day (PSD) 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14, the blood supply of the tissue flaps was evaluated using a self-made tissue flap blood supply evaluation scale. At 12 months after surgery, the patients' satisfaction with the efficacy of tissue flap repair was evaluated using the satisfaction score standard for flap efficacy. Before surgery and at 3 and 12 months after surgery, a self-made abdominal wall strength evaluation scale was used to evaluate the strength of abdominal wall. At 12 months after surgery, a self-made abdominal appearance evaluation scale was used to evaluate the condition of abdominal scars, degree of abdominal symmetry, the appearance and restoration of umbilicus, abdominal protrusion during dressing, and formation of folds on both sides of the abdomen. Data were statistically analyzed with analysis of variance for repeated measurement, independent sample t test, paired sample t test, and Fisher's exact probability test. Results: On PSD 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14, there was no significant change in the blood supply score of tissue flaps of patients in the two groups, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). At 12 months after surgery, the satisfaction ratio of patients in DIEP flap group with tissue flap repair efficacy was 8/9, which was close to 7/8 in MS-TRAM flap group (P>0.05). The preoperative abdominal wall strength of patients between the two groups was similar (P>0.05), while the abdominal wall strength of patients in DIEP flap group was significantly stronger than that in MS-TRAM flap group at 3 and 12 months after surgery (with t values of 3.09 and 3.02, respectively, P<0.05). Compared with the preoperative strength within each group, the abdominal wall strength of patients in DIEP flap group at 3 months after surgery and in MS-TRAM flap group at 3 and 12 months after surgery decreased significantly (with t values of 6.04, 9.71, and 2.91, respectively, P<0.05), which did not change significantly in DIEP flap group at 12 months after surgery (P>0.05). At 12 months after surgery, the scores of abdominal scars, degree of abdominal symmetry, the appearance and restoration of umbilicus, abdominal protrusion during dressing, and formation of folds on both sides of the abdomen of patients were similar between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions: Free transplantation of DIEP flap and MS-TRAM flap to repair the extensive skin and soft tissue defects in the limbs can achieve good repair results, including good blood supply of tissue flap and abdominal shape, and the patients' high degree of satisfaction with the efficacy of tissue flap repair. However, DIEP flap is superior to MS-TRAM flap in terms of long-term postoperative abdominal wall strength recovery, showing a broader prospect of application.

Prospective Clinical Trial of Premastectomy Radiotherapy Followed by Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Operable Breast Cancer

Radiation delivered prior to mastectomy and autologous breast reconstruction may avoid the adverse effects of radiation on autologous donor tissue while providing the psychologic benefit of immediate reconstruction. We aimed to study the feasibility of premastectomy radiation therapy (PreMRT). A total of 50 women enrolled in a prospective trial of preoperative radiation to the breast and regional nodes followed by mastectomy with axillary evaluation and immediate breast reconstruction. The trial was embedded in a randomized trial of hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated regional nodal irradiation (NCT02912312). Eligible women enrolled from 2018-22, had cT0-T3 N0-3 breast cancer, and a pre-operative recommendation for radiation. The primary outcome was frequency of complete free flap loss. Mastectomy skin flap necrosis was assessed by validated SKIN grading score. The Satisfaction with Breast Cosmetic Outcomes Scales evaluated patient satisfaction with cosmetic result. Descriptive statistics and 95% exact confidence intervals were calculated. One patient withdrew prior to any treatment and one elected not to have breast reconstruction. Median age of the 48 women completing PreMRT and reconstruction was 48 [range 31-72]. Most had ER-positive HER2-negative (77%), cT3 (54%) or cT2 (38%), cN1 (79%) disease and received 50 Gy in 25 fractions (n = 24) or 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions (n = 23). Four received 10-16 Gy internal mammary or infraclavicular boost. 35% VMAT, 48% matched photon-electron, and 17% partially-wide-tangent technique. Median time to surgery was 23 days [14-85]. Skin reaction delayed surgery for one patient. Most had skin-sparing mastectomy (92%) and axillary lymph node dissection (67%). 12 surgeons performed the reconstructions: 35 deep inferior epigastric perforators; 4 profunda artery perforator; 2 muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous; 1 latissimus dorsi (LD); 2 LD/implant; 2 LD/tissue expander (TE); and 2 subpectoral (SP) TE. There were no complete flap losses. Two patients (4.4%, 95% CI 0.5%-14.8%) with free flaps had partial flap loss with revision surgery. Both patients with SP TEs had infections and unplanned reoperation. The protocol was subsequently amended to not allow SP TE reconstruction. Eight patients had skin flap necrosis: 5 partial and 3 full thickness necrosis; only 1 required operative debridement. Seven had pathologic complete response. At six months 19/31 (61%) reported being "quite a bit" or "very much" satisfied with how they looked in the mirror clothed. There are no recurrences with a median follow up of 33 months [5-119]. Radiation treatment of the breast and lymph node basins prior to mastectomy with immediate autologous reconstruction is feasible. There were no autologous flap loses and complication rates are similar to reconstruction after radiation series. This promising strategy reduces time to autologous reconstruction and merits further prospective study.

Outcome analysis of thickness-gradient, leaflet-shaped acellular dermal matrix in abdominal fascial defect repair in muscle-sparing TRAM flap based breast reconstruction.

Numerous fascial closure techniques have been used to reduce donor site morbidities after transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap harvest. A leaflet-shaped acellular dermal matrix (ADM) with a thickness gradient was designed to cover the defect effectively and to withstand the pressure applied to the lower portion of the defect. The complication and functional recovery rates of the donor site of the custom ADM were compared with those of previous methods of fascial closure (primary closure and polypropylene mesh assisted closure). A retrospective review of patients undergoing immediate or delayed breast reconstruction using muscle-sparing TRAM flaps was performed. Abdominal bulging, hernia, wound dehiscence, infection, seroma, and hematoma rates were compared. The Back Performance Scale measured four months postoperatively was compared to evaluate the donor site's recovery rate. A total of 173 patients were analyzed. The three groups did not differ in hernia, wound dehiscence, infection, and hematoma rates. However, the abdominal bulging rate was lower in the primary closure group, while the seroma rate was higher in the mesh group. Functional recovery was the fastest in the custom ADM group. A thickness-gradient, leaflet-shaped ADM can be effectively used as an onlay graft to cover the abdominal fascial defect, with similar complication rates, while providing a faster recovery of abdominal function.

The Plane of Mesh Placement Does Not Impact Abdominal Donor Site Complications in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction.

Reinforcement of the abdominal wall with synthetic mesh in autologous breast reconstruction using abdominal free tissue transfer decreases the risk of bulging and herniation. However, the impact of the plane of mesh placement on donor site complications has not yet been investigated. We performed a retrospective analysis of 312 patients who had undergone autologous breast reconstruction with muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) flaps or deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps as well as polypropylene mesh implantation at the donor site. Donor site complications were compared among patients with different flap types and different mesh positions including overlay (n = 90), inlay and overlay (I-O; n = 134), and sublay (n = 88). Abdominal hernias occurred in 2.86% of patients who had undergone MS-TRAM reconstructions and in 2.63% of patients who had undergone DIEP reconstructions. When comparing patients with different mesh positions, donor site complications occurred in 14.4% of patients with overlay mesh, 13.4% of patients with I-O mesh, and 10.2% of patients with sublay mesh (P = 0.68). Abdominal hernias occurred in 4.44% of patients with overlay mesh, 2.24% of patients with I-O mesh, and 2.27% of patients with sublay mesh (P = 0.69). Multivariable logistic regression analysis did not identify a significant association between mesh position and hernia rates as well as wound complications. Our data indicate that the plane of synthetic mesh placement in relation to the rectus abdominis muscle does not impact the rate of postoperative donor site complications in patients undergoing breast reconstruction with MS-TRAM or DIEP flaps.

The third dimension in perforator mapping—Comparison of Cinematic Rendering and maximum intensity projection in abdominal-based autologous breast reconstruction

Cinematic Rendering (CR) is a recently introduced post-processing three-dimensional (3D) visualization imaging tool. The aim of this study was to assess its clinical value in the preoperative planning of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) or muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) flaps, and to compare it with maximum intensity projection (MIP) images. The study presents the first application of CR for perforator mapping prior to autologous breast reconstruction.Two senior surgeons independently analyzed CR and MIP images based on computed tomography angiography (CTA) datasets of 20 patients in terms of vascular pedicle characteristics, the possibility to harvest a DIEP or MS-TRAM flap, and the side of the flap harvest. We calculated inter- and intra-observer agreement in order to examine the accordance of both image techniques.We observed a good inter- and intra-observer agreement concerning the type of flap and the side of the flap harvest. However, the agreement on the pedicle characteristics varies depending on the considered variable. Both investigators identified a significantly higher number of perforators with MIP compared with CR (observer 1, p<0.0001 and observer 2, p<0.0385).The current study serves as an explorative study, showing first experiences with CR in abdominal-based autologous breast reconstruction. In addition to MIP images, CR might improve the surgeon's understanding of the individual's anatomy. Future studies are required to compare CR with other 3D visualization tools and its possible effects on operative parameters.

The utility of three-dimensional models in complex microsurgical reconstruction.

BackgroundThree-dimensional (3D) model printing improves visualization of anatomical structures in space compared to two-dimensional (2D) data and creates an exact model of the surgical site that can be used for reference during surgery. There is limited evidence on the effects of using 3D models in microsurgical reconstruction on improving clinical outcomes.MethodsA retrospective review of patients undergoing reconstructive breast microsurgery procedures from 2017 to 2019 who received computed tomography angiography (CTA) scans only or with 3D models for preoperative surgical planning were performed. Preoperative decision-making to undergo a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) versus muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) flap, as well as whether the decision changed during flap harvest and postoperative complications were tracked based on the preoperative imaging used. In addition, we describe three example cases showing direct application of 3D mold as an accurate model to guide intraoperative dissection in complex microsurgical reconstruction.ResultsFifty-eight abdominal-based breast free-flaps performed using conventional CTA were compared with a matched cohort of 58 breast free-flaps performed with 3D model print. There was no flap loss in either group. There was a significant reduction in flap harvest time with use of 3D model (CTA vs. 3D, 117.7±14.2 minutes vs. 109.8±11.6 minutes; P=0.001). In addition, there was no change in preoperative decision on type of flap harvested in all cases in 3D print group (0%), compared with 24.1% change in conventional CTA group.ConclusionsUse of 3D print model improves accuracy of preoperative planning and reduces flap harvest time with similar postoperative complications in complex microsurgical reconstruction.

Lymph node transfer combined with deep inferior epigastric perforators and transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous procedures: a systematic review.

The surgical treatment of lymphedema can be conducted alone or in combination with microsurgical autologous breast reconstruction. We performed a systematic review of the literature at PubMed database regarding autologous breast reconstruction for deep inferior epigastric perforators (DIEP) or muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (ms-TRAM) and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) in patients with lymphedema following breast cancer surgery. We hypothesized that autologous breast reconstruction combined with VLNT has positive outcomes. Eligibility criteria included investigations reporting data studies evaluating female patients with lymphedema in an upper extremity after breast cancer who underwent autologous breast reconstruction combined with VLNT. The search resulted in 93 potential papers, but only 6 studies fulfilled the study eligibility criteria. The total number of patients was 103. Most of the studies evaluated the outcomes in patients treated with DIEP or ms-TRAM combined with VLNT. The studies described groin lymph node transfer as treatment for lymphedema. In most of the studies, all patients reported a reduction of arm circumference, volume, and symptoms of the upper extremity with lymphedema comparing the preoperative to the postoperative period. Overall, patients experienced successful breast reconstruction. All authors reported reduction of the circumferential size of the affected upper limb, as well as a decrease in cellulitis, in addition to favorable breast reconstruction results.

Interdisciplinary Treatment of Breast Cancer After Mastectomy With Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using Abdominal Free Flaps in a University Teaching Hospital-A Standardized and Safe Procedure.

Background: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women. The interdisciplinary treatment is based on the histological tumor type, the TNM classification, and the patient's wishes. Following tumor resection and (neo-) adjuvant therapy strategies, breast reconstruction represents the final step in the individual interdisciplinary treatment plan. Although manifold flaps have been described, abdominal free flaps, such as the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) or the muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (ms-TRAM) flap, are the current gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction. This retrospective study focuses on the safety of autologous breast reconstruction upon mastectomy using abdominal free flaps.Methods: From April 2012 until December 2018, 193 women received 217 abdominal free flaps for autologous breast reconstruction at the University Hospital of Erlangen. For perforator mapping, we performed computed tomography angiography (CTA). Venous anastomosis was standardized using a ring pin coupler system, and flap perfusion was assessed with fluorescence angiography. A retrospective analysis was performed based on medical records, the surgery report, and follow-up of outpatient course.Results: In most cases, autologous breast reconstruction was performed as a secondary reconstructive procedure after mastectomy and radiotherapy. In total, 132 ms1-TRAM, 23 ms2-TRAM, and 62 DIEP flaps were performed with 21 major complications (10%) during hospital stay including five free flap losses (2.3%). In all cases of free flap loss, we found an arterial thrombosis as the main cause. In 24 patients a bilateral breast reconstruction was performed without free flap loss. The majority of free flaps (96.7%) did not need additional supercharging or turbocharging to improve venous outflow. Median venous coupler size was 2.5 mm (range, 1.5–3.5 mm).Conclusion: Using CTA, intraoperative fluorescence angiography, titanized hernia meshes for rectus sheath reconstruction, and venous coupler systems, autologous breast reconstruction with DIEP or ms-TRAM free flaps is a safe and standardized procedure in high-volume microsurgery centers.

Rezoning Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flaps Based on Perforasome Groupings and a New Understanding of the Vascular Architecture of the Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery-Based Flaps.

We compare the vascular territory of free muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) flaps, deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps, and crossover anastomosis (CA) flaps using intraoperative ex vivo angiography. We also use ex vivo angiography to analyze the vascular architecture of the MS-TRAM flap. Our study includes 84 lower abdominal free flaps: MS-TRAM, DIEP-1 (1 perforator), DIEP-2 (2 perforators), and CA. We compare the arterial perfusion area and vascular territory pattern in each group. We also analyze the vascular architecture in MS-TRAM flaps and determine the number and location of their dominant perforators and the direction of the axial arteries connecting them. The CA's arterial perfusion area is the largest, and the DIEP-1's, the smallest of our groups; there is no statistically significant difference between MS-TRAM and DIEP-2. In all groups, average arterial perfusion area in the vascular pedicle's ipsilateral side is larger than in its contralateral side. The MS-TRAM and DIEP-2 flaps have homologous perfusion patterns and the same arterial perfusion areas. The DIEP-1 perfusion pattern varies with perforator location. Ex vivo angiograms show the MS-TRAM flap's axial arteries heading laterally to be larger and longer than those heading medially. Two dominant perforators are preferable in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Lateral perforators play a more important role in flap perfusion than do medial ones. Crossover anastomosis is an effective technology for increasing arterial perfusion areas. Our rezoning shows which areas are better for surgery and which have a high risk of complications-valuable information for a surgeon designing a flap for breast reconstruction.

Choice of recipient vessels in muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction: A comparative study.

BackgroundThoracodorsal vessels (TDVs) and internal mammary vessels (IMVs) have both been widely employed as recipient vessels for use in free muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) flaps. However, whether TDVs or IMVs are preferable as recipient vessels for autologous breast reconstruction with a free MS-TRAM flap remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes when TDVs were used as recipient vessels to those obtained when IMVs were used as recipient vessels for autologous breast reconstruction with a free MS-TRAM flap.MethodsA retrospective matched-cohort study was performed. We retrospectively reviewed data collected from patients who underwent a free MS-TRAM flap for autologous breast reconstructions after mastectomy between March 2003 and June 2013. After a one-to-one matching using age, 100 autologous breast reconstructions were selected in this study. Of the 100 breast reconstructions, 50 flaps were anastomosed to TDVs and 50 to IMVs. Patient demographics and clinical outcomes including operation time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and aesthetic score were compared between the two groups.ResultsNo statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in patient demographics and clinical outcomes, including the complication rates and aesthetic scores. There were no major complications such as total or partial flap loss in either group.ConclusionsThe results of our study demonstrate that both TDVs and IMVs were safe and efficient as recipient vessels in terms of the complication rates and aesthetic outcomes.

Predictors affecting complications and aesthetic outcomes in autologous breast reconstruction with free muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps.

Identification and understanding of predictors for complications and aesthetic outcomes in free muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) flap are essential for successful breast reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to investigate predictors for complications and aesthetic outcomes in patients who underwent autologous breast reconstruction with free MS-TRAM flaps. Between March 2003 and September 2017, a total of 214 patients who underwent breast reconstruction with MS-TRAM flaps were included in this study. Mean age of the patients was 43.2 years (range, 28-61 years). Four outcome data, including operation time, hospital stay, aesthetic scores, and complications; and 12 patient data, including recipient vessel type, age, body mass index [BMI] > 25, smoking status, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, nipple-sparing mastectomy, contralateral breast surgery, history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cardiac disease, and endocrine disease were collected. Five and 52 patients experienced major complications, including partial flap loss, and minor complications, respectively. In stepwise multiple logistic analysis, risk factors for complications were BMI > 25 (P < 0.001), smoking status (P = 0.012), and neoadjuvant radiotherapy (P = 0.002). BMI > 25 (P < 0.001), smoking status (P < 0.001), contralateral breast surgery (P < 0.001), and history of cardiac (P = 0.001) and endocrine disease (P = 0.003) were predictors for aesthetic outcome. Predictors for complications and aesthetic outcomes determined in this study may facilitate microsurgeons engaged in the assessment of patients needing free MS-TRAM flaps.

Outcomes and Cost Analysis in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Simultaneous Free Flap Breast Reconstruction and Gynecologic Procedures

For patients with BRCA mutations, a simultaneous procedure that combines risk-reducing operation of the ovaries with mastectomy and breast reconstruction is an attractive option. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes and associated cost of performing simultaneous mastectomy, free flap breast reconstruction (FFR), and gynecologic procedure. A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent bilateral FFR from 2005 to 2012. Four hundred twenty-two patients were identified who underwent bilateral breast reconstruction without a simultaneous gynecologic procedure. Forty-two patients were identified who underwent simultaneous FFR and gynecologic procedure. Clinical outcomes, medical and surgical complications, and hospital costs were analyzed and compared between the 2 groups. A total of 928 free flaps were performed on 464 patients. Forty-two patients had a simultaneous gynecologic procedure at the time of breast reconstruction. Twenty-three (54.8%) patients within the study group underwent simultaneous bilateral salpingo oophorectomy (BSO), whereas the other 19 (45.2%) underwent both total abdominal hysterectomy and BSO. Eighty-four free flaps were performed in this cohort (n = 48 muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous, n = 28 deep inferior epigastric perforator, n = 4 superficial inferior epigastric perforator, n = 4 transverse upper gracilis). Mean operative time was 573 minutes. Mean hospitalization was 5.3 days. Postoperatively, 4 patients experienced an anastomotic thrombosis; 2 patients had an arterial thrombosis and 2 patients had a venous thrombosis. There were 2 flap failures, 2 patients with mastectomy skin flap necrosis, 11 patients who developed breast wound healing complications, and 6 patients who developed abdominal wound healing complications. Surgical and medical complication rates did not differ significantly between those who had simultaneous procedures, and those who did not. There was a statistically significant difference in the average total cost when comparing the group of patients receiving prophylactic mastectomy/FFR/total abdominal hysterectomy and/or BSO versus the patients who did not have combined gynecologic procedures at the time of reconstruction ($22,994.52 vs $21,029.23, P = 0.0004). For the high-risk breast cancer patient, a combined mastectomy, free flap reconstruction, and gynecologic procedure represents an attractive and safe option.

Is there a Rationale for Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Older Patients? A Retrospective Single Center Analysis of Quality of life, Complications and Comorbidities after DIEP or ms-TRAM Flap Using the BREAST-Q

Autologous breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) or muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (ms-TRAM) flap is a common method in the majority of patients after mastectomy. Because of an increased perioperative risk profile the benefit in older patients is questionable. To assess the postoperative quality of life and peri- and post-operative complications of older compared to younger patients is the aim of this retrospective study. In a retrospective analysis 39 older (i.e. >60 years) and 140 younger patients (i.e. <60 years) with autologous breast reconstruction in the Department of Plastic Surgery at the University Hospital of Erlangen-Nuernberg were surveyed at least 6 month postoperative using the BREAST-Q questionnaire. Correlations were generated between comorbidities and complications. Significant differences were observed regarding hospitalization, pre-existing diseases and the choice of DIEP versus ms-TRAM flaps. Parameters such as major and minor complications, bulging or hernia and risk factors (e.g. smoking or obesity) showed no significant differences. The results of the questionnaire parameters showed no significant difference between both groups, revealing high satisfaction with the aesthetic result and an improvement in quality of life independent of age. Autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy generates a gain in quality of life and shows a good to excellent overall satisfaction in older as well as younger patients. Despite a longer hospitalization and a different risk profile there were no significant differences regarding minor and major complications in the postoperative course. Hence autologous breast reconstruction for older patients is justified and should be taken into consideration.

Satisfaction following Unilateral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison of Pedicled TRAM and Free Abdominal Flaps.

Background:The purpose of this study was to compare patient satisfaction following unilateral pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) and free abdominal flap reconstruction.Methods:Patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction using pedicled TRAM or free abdominal flaps (muscle-sparing TRAM or deep inferior epigastric perforator flap) and completed the BREAST-Q were identified from 2 prospectively maintained databases. BREAST-Q scores were assessed and compared for Satisfaction with Breasts, Outcome, and Physical Well-being Chest/Abdomen.Results:Of the 138 patients who completed the BREAST-Q, 84 underwent pedicled TRAM flap reconstruction and 54 underwent free abdominal flap reconstruction. Overall, pedicled TRAM flap patients scored higher than free abdominal flap patients on all 4 BREAST-Q scales. This difference reached statistical significance in Satisfaction with Breasts (+7.74; P = 0.02). Similar results were found among patients who completed the BREAST-Q at <3 years postoperation. However, among patients at ≥3 years postoperation, there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups, with the pedicled flap cohort scoring higher in Satisfaction with Breasts and Physical Well-being Chest and the free abdominal flap cohort scoring higher in Satisfaction with Outcome and Physical Well-being Abdomen scores.Conclusions:Patients who underwent unilateral pedicled TRAM flap reconstruction experienced greater initial breast satisfaction than patients who underwent unilateral free abdominal flap reconstruction, but satisfaction equalized between the two over time, suggesting that long-term satisfaction may be equivalent between the 2 methods of reconstruction.

Loupes-Only Microsurgery is a Safe Alternative to the Operating Microscope: An Analysis of 1,649 Consecutive Free Flap Breast Reconstructions.

Loupes-only microsurgery challenges the paradigm that free flap surgery requires an operating microscope. We describe our loupes-only microsurgery experience with an emphasis on rates of intraoperative anastomotic revision and total flap loss. We identified all patients having breast reconstruction with muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (ms-TRAM) or deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps over 7 years. We examined rates of intraoperative anastomotic revision and total flap loss as markers of technical quality. For one high-volume surgeon who started loupes-only microsurgery while at our institution, we examined rates of intraoperative anastomotic revision and total flap loss rates over time to evaluate for a learning curve. We performed 1,649 ms-TRAM or DIEP flaps in 1,063 patients. For 1,649 flaps, the rate of artery anastomotic revision was 2.2% (36 arteries) and venous anastomotic revision was 2.2% (37 veins). Any microvascular revision was performed in 3.5% (58 flaps). Total flap loss rate was 1.2% (20 flaps).For the "learning curve" analysis, there were no clinically relevant differences in rates of any intraoperative anastomotic revision or total flap loss during the first 60 months after loupes-only microsurgery was adopted. Total flap loss during this surgeon's first 60 months of loupes-only microsurgery was 1.6% (10 of 638 flaps). Loupes-only microsurgery is a safe alternative to the operating microscope for free flap breast reconstruction using the deep inferior epigastric system. Our total flap loss rate of 1.2% in 1,649 flaps is at the low end of published flap loss rates.

Breast Reconstruction Using a TRAM Free Flap with a Mini-Abdominoplasty Design and Flap Beveling

Background One of the most common breast reconstruction techniques that uses autologous tissue is the free muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) flap. However, patients hesitate to choose this method because of the long transverse scar between the anterior superior iliac spines. Furthermore, traditional reconstruction using a free MS-TRAM flap entails donor site morbidities such as pain, hematoma, or seroma. Here, we introduce a mini-abdominoplasty-designed free TRAM flap with flap beveling, which can be a good method for breast reconstruction in Asian patients who have small breasts. Methods Breast reconstruction with free MS-TRAM flaps using the mini-abdominoplasty design and flap beveling was performed in 10 patients following mastectomy. Patient age, presurgical brassiere cup size, tumor type, operation type, excised breast weight, elevated flap weight, flap weight used for the breast, recipient vessel, operation time, day that the abdominal drain was removed, and complications associated with both the flap and donor site were documented for all flaps and patients. Results For all 10 mini-abdominoplasty-designed free TRAM flap procedures, no flap loss or donor site morbidity was noted over a mean follow-up time of 16 months. Conclusions The mini-abdominoplasty-designed free TRAM flap can safely and satisfactorily be implanted for the reconstruction of mastectomy defects. It can transfer the lower abdominal skin and subcutaneous tissue for breast reconstruction with minimal donor site scarring and morbidity, especially in Asian patients, who generally have smaller breasts.

Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Abdominal Wall Hernias and Bulges After Muscle-Sparing Free TRAM Flaps for Breast Reconstruction

Free tissue transfer from an abdominal donor site has become a popular method for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. The detrimental effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on healing and the resulting clinical impact on patient outcome remains somewhat unclear for abdominal bulges and hernias resulting after free tissue transfer from the abdominal donor site. An institutional review board-approved retrospective review of 155 free muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) flaps performed for breast reconstruction was undertaken to evaluate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on abdominal donor-site morbidity. The primary outcome studied was the development of hernias and bulges. Statistical analysis was performed using univariate and multivariate classification and regression tree (CART) analysis. Of the 155 patients, 51 underwent bilateral MS-TRAM flaps and 104 underwent unilateral MS-TRAM flap reconstruction. Thirty-nine patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy. A statistically significant association was seen between chemotherapy treatment and the incidence of hernias alone (P < 0.05; odds ratio, 6.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-73.58). Multivariable CART analyses corroborated these findings and revealed that presence of diabetes mellitus (DM), bilaterality, and receiving chemotherapy treatment were related to increased incidence of hernias (P = 0.011, 0.005, and 0.017, respectively) after controlling for clinical variables such as smoking status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and type of closure. Univariate analyses also revealed a statistically significant association between bilaterality in conjunction with chemotherapy treatment and the incidence of hernias alone (P = 0.0002; odds ratio, 37.56; 95% confidence interval, 4.56-476.35). This highly significant finding is further augmented by multivariable CART analyses, which found that patients who were bilateral and underwent chemotherapy treatment or those with DM were significantly more likely to develop hernias (P < 0.001 and P = 0.016, respectively). To date, our study is the single largest series of abdominal donor-site complications in patients receiving chemotherapy and free MS-TRAM breast reconstruction. We have demonstrated an increase in the incidence of abdominal donor-site complications, specifically abdominal bulges and hernias, in patients undergoing chemotherapy for advanced stages of breast cancer. This increased complication rate is most pronounced in patients requiring chemotherapy who undergo bilateral reconstruction, and is also a significant risk for patients receiving chemotherapy who have preexisting DM.

Meta-analysis of the safety and factors contributing to complications of MS-TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps for breast reconstruction.

Muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM), deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP), and superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flaps have been increasingly adopted for breast reconstruction. However, their safety, patient satisfaction with them, and factors contributing to complications are not well understood. PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library were searched to identify eligible studies for inclusion in our analysis. The complication rates of and patient satisfaction rates with the flaps were measured as the outcome, and factors contributing to complications and patient satisfaction were also studied. The data were extracted, and pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Thirteen studies involving 1,843 patients met the inclusion criteria. The results of the meta-analysis showed that patients with MS-TRAM had a higher rate of abdominal hernias (RR 2.354, 95 % CI 1.154-4.802, P = 0.019) and a lower rate of fat necrosis (RR 0.502, 95 % CI 0.347-0.727, P = 0.000) than patients with DIEP. In addition, there was no significant difference between MS-TRAM and DIEP with respect to other complications (P > 0.05), between MS-TRAM and DIEP with respect to patient satisfaction (P = 0.923), and between DIEP and SIEA with respect to complication rates (P = 0.377). The complication rates of MS-TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA were 25.6, 27.9, and 26.7 %, respectively. Diabetes mellitus (P = 0.078) influenced the complication rate of MS-TRAM, and obesity (P = 0.086) and diabetes mellitus (P = 0.110) were the potential factors correlated with complications with DIEP flaps. There were no obvious differences in the overall incidence of complications between MS-TRAM and DIEP and between DIEP and SIEA. In addition, the patient satisfaction rates of MS-TRAM and DIEP were similar. However, MS-TRAM showed a higher rate of abdominal hernias and a lower rate of fat necrosis than DIEP. Obesity and diabetes mellitus were potential factors associated with the incidence of complications. Additional multicenter, large-sample-size, randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up visits are necessary. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Using Propensity Score Analysis to Compare Major Complications between DIEP and Free Muscle-Sparing TRAM Flap Breast Reconstructions

Previous studies comparing muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) versus deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) free flaps have not considered procedure selection bias. Propensity score analysis provides a statistical approach to consider preoperative factors in flap selection, and was used to compare major complications (breast and abdominal) between these microsurgical breast reconstruction (free muscle-sparing TRAM versus DIEP). This study evaluated major breast and abdominal complications in 292 consecutive patients (428 free abdominal flaps). Propensity scores were calculated for patient differences affecting flap selection (DIEP versus free muscle-sparing TRAM). Multivariate logistic models using selected covariates separately analyzed breast and abdominal complications between flap methods. There were 83 major complications (28 percent): breast, 20 percent; abdomen, 8 percent. Using propensity scores, the adjusted odds of abdominal complications were significantly higher in free muscle-sparing TRAM than in DIEP flaps (OR, 2.73; 95 percent CI, 1.01 to 7.07). With prior chemotherapy, body mass index significantly increased abdominal complications (OR, 1.16; 95 percent CI, 1.01 to 1.34). Using propensity scores, there was no significant association between reconstruction method and breast complications; diabetics had significantly increased breast complications (OR, 4.19; 95 percent CI, 1.14 to 15.98). Previous abdominal operations (OR, 1.77; 95 percent CI, 0.96 to 3.30) and immediate reconstruction (OR, 1.86; 95 percent CI, 0.94 to 3.71) approached significance. Propensity score analysis indicated significantly higher abdominal complications in free muscle-sparing TRAM compared with DIEP flaps. This study highlights the importance of separately evaluating recipient breast and donor abdominal complications and use of propensity scores to minimize procedure selection bias. Therapeutic, III.

Effect of perioperative transfusion of old red blood cells on postoperative complications after free muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap surgery for breast reconstruction

Transfusion with old red blood cells (RBCs) was associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The effect of perioperative transfusion of old RBCs on postoperative complications after free muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap surgery was retrospectively investigated. Two hundred sixty-one patients undergoing breast reconstruction were assigned to two groups: no transfusion and transfusion groups. Transfused patients were further divided according to the RBC storage duration (fresh, ≤14 days; old, >14 days). Postoperative complications such as vascular thrombosis, hematoma, and flap congestion were noted. Patients who received old blood (n = 34), compared with those received fresh blood (n = 40) or no transfusion (n = 187), had a higher incidence of postoperative complications (44.1% vs. 20.0% or 12.8%, P < 0.05). Perioperative transfusion of old RBCs can be associated with an increase in postoperative complications after free muscle sparing TRAM flap surgery.