Multi-segment Foot Research Articles

Effect of Custom-Made Foot Orthotics on Multi-Segment Foot Kinematics and Kinetics in Individuals with Structural Hallux Limitus.

The first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) and the first ray are crucial in walking, particularly during propulsion. Limitation in this joint's sagittal plane motion, known as hallux limitus, can cause compensatory movements in other joints. Some studies assessed the impact of various foot orthoses designs on the foot biomechanics; however, a comprehensive understanding is lacking. This study compared the effects of two custom-made foot orthoses (CFOs) on the foot joint kinematics and kinetics in patients with structural hallux limitus (SHL). In this quasi-experimental study, 24 patients with hallux limitus were assessed in three conditions: (i) barefoot, (ii) shod with a cut-out custom foot orthosis (cut-out CFO), and (iii) shod with an anterior forefoot-stabilized element custom foot orthosis (AFSE CFO), fitted into a minimalist neoprene shoe. Multi-segment foot kinematics and kinetics were assessed during the stance phase of the gait. A decrease in ankle and midfoot inversion, as well as in ankle plantarflexion, was found in both orthotic conditions. Regarding the first MTPJ, a greater dorsiflexion was observed with the patient being barefoot compared to both of the conditions under study. From the current finding, it should be concluded that neither of the custom foot orthoses produced the predefined functional effects.

Reliability testing of an IMU-based 2-segment foot model for clinical gait analysis

BackgroundThe one of the most commonly used reference system for clinical gait analysis is an optical motion capture system (OMC) using a multi-segment foot model. A time- and cost-efficient alternative could be an inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based systems. However, these are limited to a single segment approach for the foot and ankle. Therefore, the current setup was modified to be based on a 2-segment foot model, allowing for a separate analysis of the hind- and midfoot. The study aimed to evaluate the reliability (inter-rater, intra-rater, and test-retest reliability) of an IMU-based 2-segment foot model. Material and methodsTwelve healthy subjects were recruited to test the inter-rater, intra-rater, and test-retest reliability of the new IMU based 2-segment foot model. Gait analysis was performed on a treadmill at a constant speed of 4 km/h. Kinematic data of the tibia/hindfoot, tibia/forefoot and hindfoot/forefoot over 100 % gait cycle were analyzed. The reliability was tested by using statistical parametric mapping (SPM) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). ResultsThe SPM showed no significant difference for inter-, intra-rater, and test-retest reliability, but for a small segment of tibia/forefoot dorsiflexion test-retest reliability (2.1° difference). The single standard deviation measurement error for the sagittal and transverse plane was <5° and worse for the frontal plane. ConclusionThe new 2-segment foot model revealed a high inter-rater, intra-rater, and test-retest reliability. It is suitable for use in adult clinical practice. Still, comparative data to the OMC system using a multi-segment foot model are missing.

Concurrent validation of a new foot deviation index metric for multisegmental foot models

Concurrent validation of a new foot deviation index metric for multisegmental foot models

Development of an IMU based 2-segment foot model for an applicable medical gait analysis

BackgroundThe two most commonly instrumented gait analysis tools used are Optical Motion Capture systems (OMC) and Inertial Measurement Units (IMU). To date, OMC based gait analysis is considered the gold-standard. Still, it is space-, cost-, and time-intense. On the other hand IMU systems are more cost- and time effective but simulate the whole foot as a single segment. To get a more detailed model of the foot and ankle, a new 2-segment foot model using IMU was developed, comparable to the multi-segment foot models assessed by OMC.Research questionCan an IMU based 2-segment foot model be developed to provide a more detailed representation of the foot and ankle kinematics?MethodsTo establish a 2-segment foot model, in addition to the previous 1-segment foot model an IMU sensor was added to the calcaneus. This allowed the differentiation between the hindfoot and forefoot kinematics. 30 healthy individuals (mean age 27 ± 7 years) were recruited to create a norm data set of a healthy cohort. Moreover, the kinematic data of the 2-segment foot model were compared to those of the traditional 1-segment foot model using statistical parametric mapping.ResultsThe 2-segment foot model proved to be applicable. Furthermore, it allowed for a more detailed representation of the foot and ankle joints, similar to other multi-segment foot model. The healthy cohort’s norm data set showed a homogeneous motion pattern for gait.ConclusionThe 2-segment foot model allows for an extension of IMU-based gait analysis. Futures studies must prove the reliability and validity of the 2-segment foot model in healthy and pathologic situations.Level of evidenceLevel II.

Ability of a multi-segment foot model to measure kinematic differences in cavus, neutrally aligned, asymptomatic planus, and symptomatic planus foot types

BackgroundMulti-segment foot models (MFMs) provide a better understanding of the intricate biomechanics of the foot, yet it is unclear if they accurately differentiate foot type function during locomotion. Research questionWe employed an MFM to detect subtle kinematic differences between foot types, including: pes cavus, neutrally aligned, and asymptomatic and symptomatic pes planus. The study investigates how variable the results of this MFM are and if it can detect kinematic differences between pathologic and non-pathologic foot types during the stance phase of gait. MethodsIndependently, three raters instrumented three subjects on three days to assess variability. In a separate cohort, each foot type was statically quantified for ten subjects per group. Each subject walked while instrumented with a four-segment foot model to assess static alignment and foot motion during the stance phase of gait. Statistical analysis performed with a linear mixed effects regression. ResultsModel variability was highest for between-day and lowest for between–rater, with all variability measures being within the true sample variance. Almost all static measures (radiographic, digital scan, and kinematic markers) differed significantly by foot type. Sagittal hindfoot to leg and forefoot to leg kinematics differed between foot types during late stance, as well as coronal hallux to forefoot range of motion. The MFM had low between-rater variability and may be suitable for multiple raters to apply to a single study sample without introducing significant error. The model, however, only detected a few dynamic differences, with the most dramatic being the hallux to forefoot coronal plane range of motion.Significance: Results only somewhat aligned with previous work. It remains unclear if the MFM is sensitive enough to accurately detect different motion between foot types (pathologic and non-pathologic). A more accurate method of tracking foot bone motion (e.g., biplane fluoroscopy) may be needed to address this question.

In-shoe multi-segment foot kinematics measurement during the stance phase of running using a stretch strain sensor

Multi-segment foot kinematics during shod running are difficult to investigate in clinical settings. Stretch strain sensors can measure foot kinematics; however, whether they can evaluate foot kinematics during shod running or at the midfoot kinematics remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the stretch strain sensor could reveal differences between shod and barefoot conditions and midfoot kinematics during running.Eighteen healthy adults were included in the study. A stretch strain sensor and three-dimensional motion capture system were used to measure foot kinematics during barefoot and shod running with a rearfoot strike pattern. The correlation between the amplitudes of the two signals during barefoot running was investigated, and the similarity between the two signals was evaluated using the cross-correlation coefficient. Statistical parametric mapping was used to compare shod and barefoot conditions.Shod running had significantly lower sensor strain from 30 % to 100 % stance compared to barefoot running (p < 0.05). The sensor amplitude was significantly correlated with the shank–rearfoot frontal (r = 0.668, p = 0.002), the rearfoot–midfoot transverse (r = 0.546, p = 0.02), and the midfoot–forefoot sagittal planes (r = 0.563, p = 0.01). A high cross-correlation was observed between the sensor signal and the shank–rearfoot sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes and the midfoot–forefoot sagittal plane.This sensor can be used to investigate foot kinematics during shod running. The sensor signal mainly reflects the shank–rearfoot frontal and midfoot–forefoot sagittal planes, as well as the maximum kinematic range of the rearfoot-midfoot transverse plane.

Multivariate functional principal component analysis and k-means clustering to identify kinematic foot types during gait in children with cerebral palsy

BackgroundChildren with neuromuscular disorders, such as cerebral palsy, frequently develop foot deformities, such as equinopronovalgus and equinosupovarus, leading to walking difficulties and discomfort. Traditional assessment methods, including clinical measures and radiographs, often fail to capture the dynamic nature of these deformities, resulting in suboptimal treatment. 3D gait analysis using multisegment foot models offers a more detailed understanding of these deformities. Research questionTo determine whether the combination of multisegment foot models, multivariate functional principal component analysis, and k-means cluster analyses could identify distinct, clinically relevant foot types in a large pediatric cohort with cerebral palsy. MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of 3D gait data from 197 patients with cerebral palsy collected using a multisegment foot model. Multivariate functional principal component analysis was used to reduce these data prior to using k-means clustering to identify foot posture clusters. Further analyses, including ANOVA and Fisher's Exact tests, were used to evaluate demographic, radiographic, and gait characteristics to explain the clinical relevance of each cluster. ResultsAnalysis of kinematic data from 371 feet revealed six clinically significant clusters, with a low misclassification rate of 2 %. One-factor ANOVAs demonstrated significant differences across clusters for all MPCs, whereas no significant differences were noted in basic anthropometric variables. Significant variations were observed in radiographic and gait function variables, and a strong association between GMFCS levels and cluster categorization was identified. SignificanceThe novel approach of integrating multivariate functional principal component analysis and k-means clustering identified a spectrum of foot deformities in children with CP, ranging from equinosupovarus to marked equinopronovalgus. This methodology provides an objective classification based on kinematic data and can facilitate improved diagnosis and treatment of cerebral palsy-related foot deformities.

Multi-Segment Foot Kinematics during Gait in Adults with Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Flatfoot

PurposeTo investigate the differences in foot kinematics during gait between adults with asymptomatic and symptomatic flatfoot.MethodsThe study included 10 participants (six males and four females, aged 25.7 ± 6.5 years) with symptomatic flatfoot and 10 participants (eight males and two females, aged 21.2 ± 1.0 years) with asymptomatic flatfoot. Multi-segment foot kinematics were captured during barefoot gait analysis using a 3D software. Angles were calculated for the calcaneus with respect to the shank (Sha-Cal), the midfoot with respect to the calcaneus (Cal-Mid), and the metatarsus with respect to the midfoot (Mid-Met) during the stance phase.ResultsSome differences were noted between medium-to-large effect sizes. The symptomatic group had a decreased Mid-Met dorsiflexion angle at the initial contact to 50% of the stance phase compared with the asymptomatic group. The symptomatic group also showed decreased Mid-Met abduction at initial contact, larger Sha-Cal eversion angles at 10% of the stance phase, and larger Cal-Mid eversion angles at 50% and 70% of the stance phase compared to the asymptomatic group. The symptomatic group also had a larger peak Sha-Cal eversion angle than the asymptomatic group.ConclusionAdults with symptomatic flatfoot exhibit significant differences in foot kinematics towards decreased forefoot dorsiflexion at initial contact to mid-stance, decreased forefoot abduction at initial contact, and increased rearfoot eversion during the stance phase compared with those with asymptomatic flatfoot during gait. Pain may impair intersegmental motion.

Multi-segment foot kinematics during gait in children with spastic cerebral palsy

BackgroundFoot deformities (e.g. planovalgus and cavovarus) are very common in children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP), with the midfoot often being involved. Dynamic foot function can be assessed with 3D gait analysis including a multi-segment foot model. Incorporating a midfoot segment in such a model, allows quantification of separate Chopart and Lisfranc joint kinematics. Yet, midfoot kinematics have not previously been reported in CP. Research questionsWhat is the difference in multi-segment kinematics including midfoot joints between common foot deformities in CP and typically-developing feet? Methods103 feet of 57 children with spastic CP and related conditions were retrospectively included and compared with 15 typically-developing children. All children underwent clinical gait analysis with the Amsterdam Foot Model marker set. Multi-segment foot kinematics were calculated for three strides per foot and averaged. A k-means cluster analysis was performed to identify foot deformity groups that were present within CP data. The deformity type represented by each cluster was based on the foot posture index. Kinematic output of the clusters was compared to typically-developing data for a static standing trial and for the range of motion and kinematic waveforms during walking, using regular and SPM independent t-tests respectively. ResultsA neutral, planovalgus and varus cluster were identified. Neutral feet showed mostly similar kinematics as typically-developing data. Planovalgus feet showed increased ankle valgus and Chopart dorsiflexion, eversion and abduction. Varus feet showed increased ankle varus and Chopart inversion and adduction. SignificanceThis study is the first to describe Chopart and Lisfranc joint kinematics in different foot deformities of children with CP. It shows that adding a midfoot segment can provide additional clinical and kinematic information. It highlights joint angles that are more distinctive between deformities, which could be helpful to optimize the use of multi-segment foot kinematics in the clinical decision making process.

New Perspectives on Foot Segment Forces and Joint Kinetics-Integrating Plantar Shear Stresses and Pressures with Multi-segment Foot Modeling.

The role of the many small foot articulations and plantar tissues in gait is not well understood. While kinematic multi-segment foot models have increased our knowledge of foot segmental motions, the integration of kinetics with these models could further advance our understanding of foot mechanics and energetics. However, capturing and effectively utilizing segmental ground reaction forces remains challenging. The purposes of this study were to (1) develop methodology to integrate plantar pressures and shear stresses with a multi-segment foot model, and (2) generate and concisely display key normative data from this combined system. Twenty-six young healthy adults walked barefoot (1.3m/s) across a pressure/shear sensor with markers matching a published 4-segment foot model. A novel anatomical/geometric template-based masking method was developed that successfully separated regions aligned with model segmentation. Directional shear force plots were created to summarize complex plantar shear distributions, showing opposing shear forces both between and within segments. Segment centers of pressure (CoPs) were shown to be primarily stationary within each segment, suggesting that forward progression in healthy gait arises primarily from redistributing weight across relatively fixed contact points as opposed to CoP movement within a segment. Inverse dynamics-based normative foot joint moments and power were presented in the context of these CoPs to aid in interpretation of tissue stresses. Overall, this work represents a successful integration of motion capture with direct plantar pressure and shear measurements for multi-segment foot kinetics. The presented tools are versatile enough to be used with other models and contexts, while the presented normative database may be useful as a baseline comparison for clinical work in gait energetics and efficiency, balance, and motor control. We hope that this work will aid in the advancement and availability of kinetic MSF modeling, increase our knowledge of foot mechanics, and eventually lead to improved clinical diagnosis, rehabilitation, and treatment.

Skin marker-based versus bone morphology-based coordinate systems of the hindfoot and forefoot

Segment coordinate systems (CSs) of marker-based multi-segment foot models are used to measure foot kinematics, however their relationship to the underlying bony anatomy is barely studied. The aim of this study was to compare marker-based CSs (MCSs) with bone morphology-based CSs (BCSs) for the hindfoot and forefoot. Markers were placed on the right foot of fifteen healthy adults according to the Oxford, Rizzoli and Amsterdam Foot Model (OFM, RFM and AFM, respectively). A CT scan was made while the foot was loaded in a simulated weight-bearing device. BCSs were based on axes of inertia. The orientation difference between BCSs and MCSs was quantified in helical and 3D Euler angles. To determine whether the marker models were able to capture inter-subject variability in bone poses, linear regressions were performed. Compared to the hindfoot BCS, all MCSs were more toward plantar flexion and internal rotation, and RFM was also oriented toward more inversion. Compared to the forefoot BCS, OFM and RFM were oriented more toward dorsal and plantar flexion, respectively, and internal rotation, while AFM was not statistically different in the sagittal and transverse plane. In the frontal plane, OFM was more toward eversion and RFM and AFM more toward inversion compared to BCS. Inter-subject bone pose variability was captured with RFM and AFM in most planes of the hindfoot and forefoot, while this variability was not captured by OFM. When interpreting multi-segment foot model data it is important to realize that MCSs and BCSs do not always align.

Mechanics of the foot and ankle joints during running using a multi-segment foot model compared with a single-segment model.

The primary purpose of this study was to compare the ankle joint mechanics, during the stance phase of running, computed with a multi-segment foot model (MULTI; three segments) with a traditional single segment foot model (SINGLE). Traditional ankle joint models define all bones between the ankle and metatarsophalangeal joints as a single rigid segment (SINGLE). However, this contrasts with the more complex structure and mobility of the human foot, recent studies of walking using more multiple-segment models of the human foot have highlighted the errors arising in ankle kinematics and kinetics by using an oversimplified model of the foot. This study sought to compare whether ankle joint kinematics and kinetics during running are similar when using a single segment foot model (SINGLE) and a multi-segment foot model (MULTI). Seven participants ran at 3.1 m/s while the positions of markers on the shank and foot were tracked and ground reaction forces were measured. Ankle joint kinematics, resultant joint moments, joint work, and instantaneous joint power were determined using both the SINGLE and MULTI models. Differences between the two models across the entire stance phase were tested using statistical parametric mapping. During the stance phase, MULTI produced ankle joint angles that were typically closer to neutral and angular velocities that were reduced compared with SINGLE. Instantaneous joint power (p<0.001) and joint work (p<0.001) during late stance were also reduced in MULTI compared with SINGLE demonstrating the importance of foot model topology in analyses of the ankle joint during running. This study has highlighted that considering the foot as a rigid segment from ankle to MTP joint produces poor estimates of the ankle joint kinematics and kinetics, which has important implications for understanding the role of the ankle joint in running.

Change of Segmental Motion Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty Using a 3-Dimensional Multi-segment Foot Model.

Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) enhances patients' subjective outcomes with respect to pain and function. The aim of this study was to analyze the biomechanical changes of the affected limb following TAA using gait analysis with a 3-dimensional multi-segment foot model (3D MFM). We reviewed medical records, simple radiographs, and gait analyses using a 3D MFM of patients who underwent TAA for severe varus ankle arthritis. Preoperative and postoperative gait data of 24 patients were compared. Postoperative gait analyses were done at least 1 year after surgery. TAA significantly increased stride length (p = 0.024). The total range of motion of all planes in the hindfoot and forefoot showed no significant changes between preoperative and postoperative states. Hindfoot was significantly plantarflexed and pronated after TAA, while forefoot was significantly supinated in all phases. After appropriate calculations, the genuine coronal motion of the hindfoot showed no changes after TAA in all phases. TAA did not result in biomechanical improvements of segmental motions in the forefoot and hindfoot, except for changes to the bony structures. Therefore, it is important to point out to patients that TAA will not result in significant improvement of ankle function and range of motion. Clinicians can consider this information during preoperative counseling.

For plantar taping, direction of elasticity matters

Plantar taping has been used in clinical settings as a short-term conservative treatment for plantar heel pain and related pathologies. The rise of at-home taping methods may offer patients more independence, but effectiveness has not been established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of plantar taping on foot mechanics during gait. We hypothesized that material compliance would drive mechanical effectiveness, with longitudinally inelastic tape reducing medial longitudinal arch (MLA) motion and anterior/posterior (A/P) plantar tissue spreading forces, and laterally inelastic tape reducing medial/lateral (M/L) tissue spreading. We also hypothesized that these effects would be influenced by foot structure. Fifteen healthy participants were tested in a randomized cross-over study design. Barefoot (BF) plus four taping methods were evaluated, including two inelastic tapes (Low-Dye, LD, and FasciaDerm, FD) along with longitudinally elastic kinesiology tape (KT) and a novel laterally elastic kinesiology tape (FAST, FS). Participants’ arch height and flexibility were measured followed by instrumented gait analysis with a multi-segment foot model. Ankle eversion and MLA drop/rise were calculated from rearfoot and forefoot reference frames, while plantar tissue spreading was calculated from shear stresses. ANOVAs with Holm pairwise tests evaluated tape effects while correlations connected arch structure and taping effectiveness (α = 0.05). The three longitudinally inelastic tapes (LD, FD, FS) reduced MLA drop by 11–15% compared with KT and BF. In late stance, these tapes also inhibited MLA rise (LD by 29%, FD and FS by 10–15%). FS and FD reduced A/P spreading forces, while FD reduced M/L spreading forces compared with all other conditions. Arch height had a moderately strong correlation (r = -0.67) with the difference in MLA drop between BF and FS. At-home plantar taping can affect the mechanical function of the foot, but tape elasticity direction matters. Longitudinally elastic kinesiology tape has little effect on mechanics, while inelastic tapes control MLA drop but also restrict MLA rise in late stance. Lateral elasticity does not limit tissue spreading and may increase comfort without sacrificing MLA control. At-home taping has the potential to broaden conservative treatment of plantar heel pain, flat foot deformity, and related pathologies, but additional studies are needed to connect mechanics with symptom relief.

The predictive value of multi-segment foot kinetics in the development of foot deformities in cerebral palsy

The predictive value of multi-segment foot kinetics in the development of foot deformities in cerebral palsy

The clinical and biomechanical effects of customized foot orthoses in individuals with plantar heel pain: A pre-post intervention study

BackgroundCustomized foot orthoses (CFOs) are often recommended for the management of plantar heel pain. However, there is a lack of information regarding lower limb and multi-segment foot motion during gait. Research questionThis study aimed to determine the effects of heat moulded CFOs on foot and lower limb kinematics when compared with prefabricated foot orthoses (PFOs) and wearing no orthoses (shod condition), and to determine the short-term effects of CFOs on pain intensity and foot function. MethodsThe immediate effects of CFOs on the lower limb and multi-segment foot motion were assessed. Participants were then asked to use the CFOs for one month and foot pain, function, and temporal-spatial parameters were assessed at baseline and at one month follow up. ResultsThirty-five participants (22 females), aged 40.1 (10.5) years, with a mean duration of symptoms of 12.59 months were recruited. The symptomatic limbs showed a higher forefoot varus angle and greater rearfoot and forefoot corrections were required compared to the non-symptomatic limbs. When compared with PFOs and shod conditions, CFOs provided the least forefoot and knee motion in the transverse plane during contact phase (P < 0.05, d=0.844–1.720), least rearfoot motion in the coronal plane during midstance (P < 0.05, d=0.652), and least forefoot motion in the frontal plane, knee motion in the transverse plane, and hallux motion during the propulsive phase (P < 0.05, d=0.921–1.513). Significant improvements were seen for foot pain and function (P < 0.05, d=1.390–2.231) with significant increases in cadence and walking velocity after one month of CFO use (P < 0.05, d=0.315–0.353), and those most likely to respond had greater pain and less ankle eversion (P < 0.05, d=0.855–1.115). SignificanceCFOs appear to improve pathological biomechanics associated with plantar heel pain. After one month follow up, the CFOs decreased pain intensity and increased foot function, and showed significant improvements in temporal and spatial parameters of gait.

Sex differences in the kinematics and kinetics of the foot and plantar aponeurosis during drop-jump

Plantar fasciitis is one of the most common musculoskeletal injuries in runners and jumpers, with a higher incidence in females. However, mechanisms underlying sex-associated differences in its incidence remain unclear. This study investigated the possible differences in landing and jumping kinematics and kinetics of the foot between sexes during drop-jump activities. Twenty-six participants, including 13 males and 13 females, performed drop-jumps from a platform onto force plates. Nineteen trials including ten males and nine females were selected for inverse dynamics analysis. The patterns of stretch and tensile force generated by the plantar aponeurosis (PA) were estimated using a multi-segment foot model incorporating the PA. Our results demonstrated that dorsiflexion, angular velocity, and normalized plantarflexion moment of the midtarsal joint right after the heel landed on the floor were significantly larger in females than in males. Consequently, the PA strain rate and tensile stress tended to be larger in females than in males. Such differences in the kinematics and kinetics of the foot and the PA between sexes could potentially lead to a higher prevalence of foot injuries such as plantar fasciitis in females.

Design of Composite Parallel External Fixator for Multisegment Foot and Ankle Deformity Correction: A Correction Requirement- Dominated Approach

Foot and ankle deformity is a common complaint in orthopedic surgery, among which the multisegment concurrent types are even more severe. As a key medical device for multisegment deformity correction, the composite parallel external fixator (PEF) design has a profound impact on the correction outcomes. However, existing PEFs share a single configuration and have inadequate adaptation to various deformity types, leading to problems, such as complex structural composition, excessive adjustment parameters, and uncomfortable wearing experience. To overcome these problems, this article proposes a novel correction requirement-dominated design approach for composite PEF. Multisite frame mounting modes and multitype struts are introduced to form required PEF configurations. Lower mobility struts can constrain the unwanted degrees-of-freedom, thus enabling the device to precisely match the requirement-function relationship. Taking the double-segment deformity as research object, clinical cases, and composite PEF assembly simulations are provided. Experiments are carried out on the mechanical prototype. The mounting test proves the interconverting ability and deformity-targeting property of the derived composite PEFs. Moreover, the motion test verifies that the device can distract patients of different weights to complete the correction path, and the stability test demonstrates that the device can resist external bumps, thus indicating the feasibility of the approach.

Increase in lateral contact force in the tibiotalar joint during walking in flatfoot patients with reduced stiffness of the spring ligament

Foot deformities in patients with flexible flatfeet, such as the flattened medial arch and hindfoot valgus, affect the force distribution around the tibiotalar joint during walking and increase the risk of secondary injuries. In this study, we developed a multi-segment foot model that could calculate the dynamics around the tibiotalar joint and investigated the difference in the kinetics between normal feet and feet with flatfoot. Ten participants with normal feet and ten with flexible flatfoot were enrolled in the study. The body kinematics, ground reaction force, and foot pressure of the participants were recorded during walking. A five-segment foot model was developed to calculate contact forces in the tibiotalar joint. A flatfoot model was developed by modifying the stiffness of the spring ligaments of a normal foot model. Ground reaction force was applied to the plantar surface of the foot models. The foot models were attached to a full-body musculoskeletal model to conduct inverse dynamic simulations of walking. Participants with flatfoot had significantly greater lateral contact force (1.19 BW vs. 0.80 BW) and more posteriorly located center of pressure (33.7 % vs. 46.6 %) in the tibiotalar joint than those with normal feet (p < 0.05). The average and peak posterior tibialis muscle forces were significantly larger in participants with flatfoot than in those with normal feet (3.06 BW vs. 2.22 BW; 4.52 BW vs. 3.33 BW). The altered mechanics may influence the risk of arthritis.

Three-Dimensional Kinematics and Kinetics of the Overhead Deep Squat in Healthy Adults: A Descriptive Study

The squat, a fundamental functional movement, is prone to biomechanical inefficiencies. Several screening batteries utilize the Overhead Deep Squat (OHDS) to assess individuals for stability and mobility deficits. The purpose of this study was to create a comprehensive description of the three-dimensional (3D) kinematics and kinetics for normal, healthy participants during an overhead deep squat. This descriptive study containing 70 healthy young adults (31 male, 39 female; aged 18–35) utilized a video motion tracking system interfaced with force plates to obtain full-body 3D kinematics and kinetics. Seventy-three retro-reflective markers from the combined Plug-in Gait, Vicon upper limb, and Oxford Multi-segment foot models were used. Visual 3D software was used to determine joint kinematics and kinetics. Means and standard deviations of lower limb and trunk segment joint angles in the sagittal, transverse, and horizontal planes, as well as the ground reaction forces and net internal joint moments, were computed. The largest movements and joint moments occurred in the sagittal plane; however, the frontal and transverse plane appear crucial to providing stability and mobility. These results can be used as pilot normative data for both future studies and during assessments of biomechanical abnormalities in training and rehabilitation settings.