Adding compliance (softness) has been introduced as an effective way to improve the physical collision resilience characteristics of multirotor micro aerial vehicles (MAVs). This article answers the question “Where is the best place to apply compliance in a multirotor MAV to make it more collision‐resilient?” by analyzing the output data of more than 1200 drone collision tests through two sets of accelerated and nonaccelerated collision experiments for four main configurations of micro‐quadcopters each possessing a unique softness layout of physical frame. It is shown that while applying compliance to the protective propeller guards (bumpers) of a micro‐quadcopter provides a more elastic collision, it does not improve its energy‐dissipation (impact damping) characteristics. On the other hand, enhancing the inner frame of the micro‐quadcopter with a softer structure results in higher rates of impact energy damping during the collisions and an increase in the impact time, which results in lower impact accelerations the MAV experiences during the crush. A mathematical model is developed representing the contact/collision interactions as nonlinear viscoelastic forces. Comparing the results of the simulations to the experiments suggests that this model can effectively mimic the impact behavior of contacting/colliding MAVs with different structural stiffness and damping.