Background and Aim Evaluation of health effects of highly correlated chemicals like per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) is complicated by the potential for confounding. We used a triangulation approach to determine the likelihood that observed associations could be explained by confounding across PFAS. Methods As part of a systematic review of the hepatic effects of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), we considered the sources and direction of bias in studies with varying exposure scenarios. In addition, we examined PFAS correlations and multipollutant modeling results within and across studies. Results Twenty-five studies reported on the association between PFOA exposure and hepatic effects. Fourteen were in the general population using biomarkers in blood, in which individuals are exposed to a mixture of PFAS and it can be challenging to disentangle individual effects. Eight studies were in workers exposed to PFOA via inhalation and two were in communities with significant PFOA drinking water contamination. In these studies, PFOA exposure is predominant so there is less confounding by other PFAS but there may be potential for selection bias (e.g., healthy worker effect in occupational studies and heightened awareness of PFAS exposure and toxicity in contamination communities) and other confounding (occupational). For all exposure scenarios, the majority of studies reported associations between PFOA exposure and increased alanine aminotransferase in blood. Conclusions Consistency in the direction of association combined with differences in the sources of bias across studies with different exposure sources reduces the likelihood that the observed effects can be fully explained by confounding across PFAS. Keywords Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, systematic review, evidence synthesis Disclaimer: The views expressed in this abstract are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or the policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Read full abstract