Multiple Surgical Specialties Research Articles

814 If You Want to Go Far, Go Together: Student Perception of Joint Medical and Surgical Education Programmes

Abstract Aim Medical students have varied specialty interests which acts as a barrier to undergraduate engagement at specialty-specific conferences. The Tomorrow's Doctors 2023 conference, hosted at The Royal Society of Medicine, aimed to improve students’ understanding of current innovations across multiple medical and surgical specialties. The aim of this study is to determine student perception of a combined medical and surgical conference. Method The two-day conference consisted of 8 talks and 8 workshops. Feedback was collected following each day using online questionnaires. Each questionnaire was specific to the agenda of that day. Quantitative and qualitative feedback was collected on students’ perception of combined medical and surgical conferences for undergraduate students. Free-text responses underwent thematic analysis. Results There were 90 delegates on day one and 85 delegates on day two from 16 medical schools. Post-conference feedback was completed by 45 (50.0%) and 42 (49.4%) attendees for days one and two respectively. 82.2% of day one and 88.1% of day two respondents agreed that joint medical and surgical conferences were beneficial for medical students. Thematic analysis of post-conference free-text responses revealed the commonest themes for favouring joint medical and surgical conferences were ability to explore both medical and surgical interests (52.5%), supports career progression (27.5%) and practical application of knowledge gained (17.5%). Conclusions Our feedback demonstrates that joint medical and surgical conferences are perceived as beneficial by current medical students. Future undergraduate conferences should adopt a combined approach to allow students to explore their varied interests and subsequently facilitate informed specialty selection.

1096 The African Surgical Outcomes Study in Paediatric Patients (ASOS-Paeds) and Global Paediatric Perioperative Mortality - a Meta-analysis

Abstract Aim There is little data for surgical outcomes of children in Africa. This is of particular importance as children constitute 40% of the African population, compared to a global average of 25%. As part of ASOS-Paeds - a prospective cohort study of children undergoing surgery in African countries, we undertook a meta-analysis to synthesise the evidence on global paediatric perioperative mortality. Method We searched MEDLINE, Embase and WHO Global Index Medicus for studies published within the last decade, reporting paediatric perioperative mortality. We included studies with ≥200 children that reported perioperative mortality for multiple surgical specialties and procedures. Perioperative mortality was defined as death within 30 days of surgery. For meta-analysis, proportions were combined using a random effects model. Results After screening 13,258 s and reviewing 158 full-text reports, data from 9 studies were eligible for synthesis along with data from ASOS-Paeds. The meta-analysis included 579,733 children from Africa, Europe, and North America. The pooled perioperative mortality rate per 1,000 children (95% CI) was 17.91 (9.78, 26.04) in Africa compared to 2.18 (0.95, 3.42) in Europe and North America. This equates to excess paediatric perioperative mortality in Africa between 6 (in the best-case scenario) to 25 (in the worst-case scenario) per 1,000 children. Conclusions Perioperative mortality for children undergoing surgery in Africa is 8-fold higher than in Europe and North America. Access to safe and affordable anaesthesia and surgery should be a public health priority and urgent action is needed to improve surgical outcomes for children in Africa.

578 Optimising Emergency Theatre Efficiency with the Use of a Pre-Anaesthetic Holding Bay, a Quality Improvement Project

Abstract Aim An efficient emergency theatre depends on the coordination of multiple surgical specialties, anaesthetists, and theatre staff. The serial nature of an operating list leads to downtime between cases. We sought to reduce delays between emergency cases by implementing a pre-anaesthetic holding bay. Method Anonymised data was collected from a prospectively maintained mandatory database of theatre activity. Exclusion criteria were non-surgical procedures, first case, out-of-hours procedures, and critical care admissions. Suitability was determined from a period pre-implementation and a pre-defined trial period to ensure safe rollout. Pre-, trial, and post-implementation were compared. Results 349 emergency procedures were performed in three months post-implementation. After exclusion criteria 110 were suitable for pre-anaesthetic holding bay use, and in 35 (31.8%) it was utilised. Most cases were general surgery (61%), vascular surgery (15%), and gynaecology (12%). Holding bay use decreased time without a patient in the anaesthetic room from 50 to 5 minutes (p<.001) and the time between procedures from 86 to 43 minutes (p<.001). There was no difference in anaesthetic time between the groups (36 vs 38 minutes, p=.40). Over the three months 40 more in-hours cases were completed in 48 days with no difference in procedures across the periods. Conclusions Pre-anaesthetic holding bay use reduced theatre downtime by 90%, allowing more procedures to be performed in-hours. All specialties engaged with the holding bay but to varying extent, and ensuring investment from surgeons, anaesthetists, and theatre staff is essential. This intervention, implemented with no extra resources, has increased efficiency and improved safety in the emergency theatre list.

Knowledge, Attitude, Awareness, and Future Expectations of Robotic Surgery in Patients Attending Surgical Specialties Clinics.

Introduction The use of robotic-assisted surgeries (RAS) has been growing in surgical specialties. It allows surgeons to perform higher-quality operations with fewer complications, mortality, and morbidity. However, there are a lot of misconceptions about RAS among patients. Therefore, our study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude, awareness, and future expectations of RAS in patients attending surgical clinics. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted in King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) surgical clinics in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. All participants <18 years of age were excluded. The questionnaire was distributed to 304 patients attending surgical clinics with a confidence level of 95% and a margin of error of 5%. Cluster sampling was used since the respondents were from multiple surgical specialties. Finally, multivariate analysis was performed to assess participants' preference for robotic surgery. Results Most participants (58.6%, n=178) were between 21 and 40 years old, and males were 52% of the participants. Many respondents thought a robot did not do the surgery. 70.7% of respondents had not heard of robotic surgery, with the media being the most common source of information. Internal damage was the prevalent concern (51.0%, n= 155) in malfunctions of robotic surgery. A significant relationship was found between participants from 21 to 40 years of age and a stronger preference for robotic surgery (p=.027). Respondents who preferred robotic surgery were discovered to have a significant relationship with participants who thought robotic surgery was safer and had better results (p<.001). 13.9% of participants who did not prefer robotic surgery also took cost into account significantly (χ2=28.93, p<.001, Cramer's V=.22). 67.2% (n=43) of respondents who preferred robotic surgery believed it might eventually replace present practices. Conclusion Our study concluded that the majority did not favor or were unsure whether to undergo robotic surgeries or not. However, most participants had some misconceptions and a lack of awareness about robotic surgeries. Raising awareness among patients can improve the mutual decision-making between them and their treating physician.

Operative Time Accuracy in the Era of Electronic Health Records: Addressing the Elephant in the Room.

Accurate prediction of operating room (OR) time is critical for effective utilization of resources, optimal staffing, and reduced costs. Currently, electronic health record (EHR) systems aid OR scheduling by predicting OR time for a specific surgeon and operation. On many occasions, the predicted OR time is subject to manipulation by surgeons during scheduling. We aimed to address the use of the EHR for OR scheduling and the impact of manipulations on OR time accuracy. Between April and August 2022, a pilot study was performed in our tertiary center where surgeons in multiple surgical specialties were encouraged toward nonmanipulation for predicted OR time during scheduling. The OR time accuracy within 5months before trial (Group 1) and within the trial period (Group 2) were compared. Accurate cases were defined as cases with total length (wheels-in to wheels-out) within ±30min or ±20% of the scheduled duration if the scheduled time is ≥ or <150min, respectively. The study included single and multiple Current Procedural Terminology code procedures, while procedures involving multiple surgical specialties (combo cases) were excluded. The study included a total of 8,821 operations, 4,243 (Group 1) and 4,578 (Group 2), (p <.001). The percentage of manipulation dropped from 19.8% (Group 1) to 7.6% (Group 2), (p <.001), while scheduling accuracy rose from 41.7% (Group 1) to 47.9% (Group 2), (p =.0001) with a significant reduction of underscheduling percentage (38.7% vs. 31.7%, p =.0001) and without a significant difference in the percentage of overscheduled cases (15% vs. 17%, p =.22). Inaccurate OR hours were reduced by 18% during the trial period (2,383 hr vs. 1,954hr). The utilization of EHR systems for predicting OR time and reducing manipulation by surgeons helps improve OR scheduling accuracy and utilization of OR resources.

Multimodality Imaging for 3D Printing and Surgical Rehearsal in Complex Spine Surgery.

Surgery is the mainstay treatment of symptomatic spinal tumors. It aids in restoring functionality, managing pain and tumor growth, and improving overall quality of life. Over the past decade, advancements in medical imaging techniques combined with the use of three-dimensional (3D) printing technology have enabled improvements in the surgical management of spine tumors by significantly increasing the precision, accuracy, and safety of the surgical procedures. For complex spine surgical cases, the use of multimodality imaging is necessary to fully visualize the extent of disease, including both soft-tissue and bone involvement. Integrating the information provided by these examinations in a cohesive manner to facilitate surgical planning can be challenging, particularly when multiple surgical specialties work in concert. The digital 3-dimensional (3D) model or 3D rendering and the 3D printed model created from imaging examinations such as CT and MRI not only facilitate surgical planning but also allow the placement of virtual and physical surgical or osteotomy planes, further enhancing surgical planning and rehearsal. The authors provide practical information about the 3D printing workflow, from image acquisition to postprocessing of a 3D printed model, as well as optimal material selection and incorporation of quality management systems, to help surgeons utilize 3D printing for surgical planning. The authors also highlight the process of surgical rehearsal, how to prescribe digital osteotomy planes, and integration with intraoperative surgical navigation systems through a case-based discussion. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

The Use and Outcomes of 3D Printing in Pediatric Craniofacial Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Three-dimensional (3D) printing has demonstrated efficacy in multiple surgical specialties. As accessibility improves, its use in specific fields deserves further attention. We conducted a systematic review of the implementation and outcomes of 3D printing in pediatric craniofacial surgery, as none has been performed. A systematic review was conducted according to Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Clinicaltrials.gov were queried with combinations of the terms: "3D printing," "craniofacial," "surgery," and "pediatric." Original human studies containing patients <18 years old implementing 3D printing to aid in craniofacial surgery were included. Study selection, grading, and data extraction were performed independently by multiple authors. After screening 120 articles, 7 (3 case series and 4 case reports) were included, published from 2017 to 2022. All studies addressed patients with different disease processes including craniosynostosis, cleft lip/palate, and mandibular hypoplasia. 3D printing was used to create mock surgical models in 2 studies, intraoperative cutting guides/molds (CGs) in 6 studies, and cranioplasty implants in 2 studies. Two case series determined the accuracy of the CGs was acceptable within historical comparison, while 4 articles included subjective statements on improved accuracy. Five studies noted reduced operating time, 2 noted reduced intraoperative blood loss, and 1 felt the use of 3D printed materials was responsible for shorter hospitalization duration. No adverse events were reported. Despite the limitations of the current literature, all studies concluded that the use of 3D printing in pediatric craniofacial surgery was beneficial. Definitive conclusions cannot be made until further controlled research is performed.

Implementation of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery at a General hospital in Zambia

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS), with its aim of reducing operative stress and accelerating rehabilitation, became a standard perioperative care in multiple surgical specialties in developed world. However, little is known about the implementation of the fast-track pathways in a low-resource environment. The objective of the study was to describe our experience and share lessons obtained in using ERAS protocol in general surgery patients.&#x0D; Methods: In this descriptive study, all consecutive patients with no age restrictions undergoing elective and urgent abdominal surgery were assessed for inclusion in ERAS program. A retrospective analysis encompasses 98 patients aged two weeks to 87 years with male to female ratio of 2.3:1. Outcomes were functional recovery, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay.&#x0D; Results: All elements of ERAS protocol including minimal incision length laparotomy and accelerated postoperative care were used; however, certain components were modified depending on the availability of the resources and patient’s condition. Postoperative period complicated in 17.4% of cases, seven patients (7.4%) died after urgent operations, and no mortality was recorded after elective procedures. Median length of stay was 4.0 days. Local and systemic septic complications, paralytic ileus and performing of the stoma reversal procedure during the same hospital stay were reasons for delayed discharge.&#x0D; Conclusion: This study indicates that employment of ERAS program for general surgery population at a second level hospital is feasible and safe. Further larger-scale studies are needed.

The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol for the perioperative management of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors/pituitary adenomas.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal perioperative care pathway that has radically modified the management of patients in multiple surgical specialties. Until now, no ERAS Society guidelines have been formulated for the management of cranial pathologies. During the process of ERAS certification for their neurosurgical department, the authors formulated an ERAS protocol for the perioperative care of patients with pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNET), along with a compliance checklist to monitor the adherence to it and its feasibility. The authors describe the protocol and checklist and report the results, including a cost-minimization analysis, with the application of the ERAS philosophy. The steps that led to the development of this ERAS protocol, including items concerning the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative period, are detailed. The authors report their preliminary results through the comparison of the care practice of a historical cohort with a consecutive surgical cohort of patients with PitNET who underwent operation after the implementation of this ERAS protocol. A compliance checklist with key performance indicators was useful to monitor the adherence to the protocol and the changes in the perioperative management. Following the introduction of this ERAS protocol, the authors significantly shortened the duration of the antibiotic therapy (p < 0.00001) and increased the use of mechanical (p < 0.00001) and pharmacological measures to prevent deep venous thrombosis (p = 0.002). The median length of hospital stay was significantly shorter for the ERAS group (p = 0.00014), and there was no increase in readmission rate or postoperative complications. The documentation and data tracking strongly improved in the ERAS cohort and the authors were more attentive in pain evaluation (p = 0.001), postoperative hormonal supplementation (p = 0.001) and early feeding and mobilization (p = 0.0008 and p < 0.00001, respectively). More patients were discharged on day 3 after surgery in the ERAS group (p < 0.00001). The compliance to the whole process increased from 64.2% to 89.5% (p = 0.016), and the compliance per patient was also found to have significantly increased (p < 0.00001). The introduction of a standardized ERAS protocol for the perioperative management of patients with PitNET allowed the authors to improve the multidisciplinary management of these patients. With the application of simple cost-effective interventions and with the avoidance of unnecessary measures, gains were made in terms of early mobilization and feeding, thereby resulting in a shorter in-hospital stay.

Age-Adjusted Modified Frailty Index: Association With Hip Fracture Discharge Functional Dependence

IntroductionHip fractures are a common traumatic injury that carry significant morbidity and mortality, and prognostication of functional outcome is becoming increasingly salient. Across multiple surgical specialties, the five-item and 11-item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5 and mFI-11) have been found to be convenient, quick, and sensitive tools for identifying patients at risk for perioperative complications. A prior study described the superiority of an Age-Adjusted Modified Frailty Index (aamFI) for predicting perioperative complications compared to the mFI-5 in an elective hip surgery. We sought to externally validate the aamFI in a multicenter hip fracture cohort and hypothesize that these risk scores would not only predict functional dependence (FD) at discharge, but that the aamFI would outperform the mFI-5 and mFI-11. MethodsThe Pennsylvania Trauma Systems Foundation registry was queried from 2010 to 2020 for CPT codes, ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes pertaining to hip fracture patients. Patients with missing locomotion and transfer mobility data were excluded. FD status was determined by discharge locomotion and transfer mobility scores per existing methodology. Univariable and Multivariable analysis as well as receiver operator characteristic curves were used to evaluate and compare the three indices for prediction of functional status at discharge. P value < 0.05 was considered significant. ResultsTwelve thousand seven hundred and forty patients met inclusion criteria (FD: 8183; functional independent 4557). On univariable logistic regression analysis, the mFI-11 (odds ratio [OR] 1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47-1.58, P < 0.05), mFI-5 (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.51-1.63), and aamFI (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.52-1.62, P < 0.05) were associated with FD. On multivariable logistic regression analysis for predictors of FD, when controlling for age (for the mFI-11 and mFI-5), sex, injury severity score, and admission vitals (systolic blood pressure and respiratory rate), higher mFI-11 and mFI-5 scores independently predicted FD at discharge (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.18-1.28, P < 0.05 and OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.18-1.29P < 0.05 respectively). Higher aaMFI scores had superior association with functional dependence (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.54-1.64, P < 0.05). Receiver operator characteristic curves for the mFI-11, mFI-5, and aaMFI showed comparable diagnostic strength (area under curve [AUC] = 0.63 95% CI 0.62-0.64, P < 0.05; AUC = 0.63 95% CI 0.62-0.64, P < 0.05; and AUC = 0.67 95% CI 0.65-0.67, P < 0.05 respectively). ConclusionsThe mFI-11, mFI-5, and aamFI are predictive of functional outcome following hip fracture. By including age, the aamFI retains the ease of use of the mFI-5 while improving its prognostic utility for functional outcome.

Sustainability of enhanced recovery after surgery programmes in gastrointestinal surgery: A scoping review.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is an evidence-based intervention that is well-recognised across multiple surgical specialties as having potential to lead to improved patient and hospital outcomes. Little is known about sustainability of ERAS programmes. This review aimed to describe available evidence evaluating sustainability of ERAS programmes in gastrointestinal surgery to understand: (a) how sustainability has been defined; (b) examine determinants of sustainability; (c) identify strategies used to facilitate sustainability; (d) identify adaptations to support sustainability; and (e) examine outcomes measured as indicators of sustainability of ERAS programmes. This scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology. Research databases (PubMed, Embase, CINHAL) and the grey literature were searched (inception to September 2022) for studies reporting sustainability of ERAS programmes in gastrointestinal surgery. Included articles reported an aspect of sustainability (i.e., definition, determinants, strategies, adaptations, outcomes and ongoing use) at ≥2 years following initial implementation. Aspects of sustainability were categorised according to relevant frameworks to facilitate synthesis. The search strategy yielded 1852 records; first round screening excluded 1749, leaving 103 articles for full text review. Overall, 22 studies were included in this review. Sustainability was poorly conceptualised and inconsistently reported across included studies. Provision of adequate resources was the most frequently identified enabler to sustainability (n/N = 9/12, 75%); however, relatively few studies (n = 4) provided a robust report of determinants, with no study reporting determinants of sustainability and strategies and adaptations to support sustainability alongside patient and service delivery outcomes. Improved reporting, particularly of strategies and adaptations to support sustainability is needed. Refinement of ERAS reporting guidelines should be made to facilitate this, and future implementation studies should plan to document and report changes in context and corresponding programme changes to help researchers and clinicians sustain ERAS programmes locally.

Surgical Specialty Impacts Quality of Operative Training in Carotid Endarterectomy

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is currently performed by multiple surgical specialties. The impact of surgical specialty and operative volume on post-CEA outcomes has been well described. However, it is unclear whether trainees of different surgical specialties have similar quality of operative training. Data from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education annual reports were collected and compared between graduating vascular surgery (VS) residents, VS fellows, and neurological surgery (NS) residents. Only cases reported as chief/senior/lead resident, surgeon junior, or surgeon fellow were included in analysis. Linear regression analysis was utilized to evaluate trends in case-mix and volume. From 2013 to 2022, total CEA case volume was higher among VS residents and fellows, compared to NS residents (52.8±0.8 vs. 44.3±1.4 vs. 12.9±0.6, P<0.0001). Additionally, VS residents and fellows performed other carotid operations including transfemoral or transcarotid artery stenting (11.1±0.9 vs. 11.2±0.8 vs. 0), carotid body tumor resection (0.7±0.1 vs. 0.7±0.0 vs. 0), and extracranial cervical bypass (6.7±0.3 vs. 6.3±0.3 vs. 0) that were not reported by the NS resident cohort (P<0.0001 each). On linear regression analysis, total CEA procedures did not change for VS residents (R2=0.03, P=0.62), decreased for VS fellows (-1.29 cases/yr, R2=0.75, P<0.0001), and decreased among NS residents (-0.41 cases/yr, R2=0.44, P=0.01) over the study period. Although residents of multiple surgical specialties are trained in CEA, vascular training offers significantly greater numbers and diversity of extracranial carotid cases. It also appears that CEA volume is decreasing among neurosurgical trainees. In light of recent reports on the volume-outcome effect in carotid surgery, these data may have implications for future practice patterns in the domain of extracranial carotid artery disease.

797 Short-Term Review of the Presentations and Outcomes of Vocal Fold Palsy Cases Identified at a Large DGH

Abstract Aim Due to the convoluted course of the recurrent laryngeal nerves, vocal cord palsy can be a manifestation of pathologies that cross multiple surgical and medical specialties. The primary role of the vocal folds is that of airway protection. Therefore, it is important that all relevant clinicians understand this clinical scenario in order to prevent aspiration pneumonia in their patients. Method We reviewed eight months of referrals and diagnoses of patients with vocal cord paresis or palsy. This was in the setting of a tertiary Head &amp; Neck service within a large DGH. We assessed the aetiology, management, and outcome of these cases. Results Eleven new cases were identified over the course of eight months. One was due to intrathoracic vascular pathology; one breast cancer; two from head &amp; neck cancer; one bilateral palsy due to upper-GI cancer surgery; four from thyroid-related pathology; one lung cancer; and one idiopathic. To date, ten of eleven cases appear permanent in nature. One patient underwent in-clinic injection laryngoplasty. Two patients (18%) died within six months of diagnosis, both predictable deaths based on baseline pathology. Conclusions Our experience demonstrated the relevance of ENT (Head &amp; Neck), Vascular, Breast, Upper-GI and Thoracic surgeons as well as medical colleagues in Endocrinology, Respiratory Medicine, and Rheumatology. We present diagnostic and management strategies to help surgical trainees across the specialties identify, manage, and refer patients to prevent complication, improve quality of life and provide access to relatively novel procedures such as awake (local anaesthetic) injection laryngoplasty.

Short Peptide Nanofiber Biomaterials Ameliorate Local Hemostatic Capacity of Surgical Materials and Intraoperative Hemostatic Applications in Clinics.

Short designer self-assembling peptide (dSAP) biomaterials are a new addition to hemostat group. It may provide diverse and robust toolboxes for surgeon to integrate wound microenvironment with much safer and stronger hemostatic capacity than conventional materials and hemostatic agents. Especially in noncompressible torso hemorrhage (NCTH), diffuse mucosal surface bleeding, and internal medical bleeding (IMB), etal., with respect to the optimal hemostatic formulation, dSAP biomaterials are the ingenious nanofiber alternatives to make bioactive neural scaffold, nasal packing, large mucosal surface coverage in gastrointestinal surgery (esophagus, gastric lesion, duodenum, and lower digestive tract), epicardiac cell delivery carrier, transparent matrix barrier, etal. Herein, in multiple surgical specialties, dSAP biomaterials-based nano hemostats achieve safe, effective and immediate hemostasis, facile wound healing, and potentially reduce the risks in delayed bleeding, rebleeding, postoperative bleeding or related complications. The biosafety in vivo, bleeding indications, tissue-sealing quality, surgical feasibility, and local usability are addressed comprehensively and sequentially and pursued to develop useful surgical techniques with better hemostatic performance. This article provides the state of art and all-round advancements of nano hemostatic approaches in surgery. Relevant critical insights will inspire exciting investigations on peptide nanotechnology, next-generation biomaterials, and better promising prospects in clinics. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Closing the pandemic-related surgical training gap using cadaveric simulation

Introduction Surgical training has been greatly hampered by the COVID-19 pandemic. We designed an intensive cadaveric simulation “catch-up” course to be delivered to trainees in several surgical specialties in a single sitting. Our aims were to measure the training gap brought about by the pandemic, and to assess the feasibility and educational impact of a catch-up simulation training course using a single set of cadavers over three days. Methods Twenty-six trainees (at grades CT1 to ST6 and from 6 surgical specialties as well as anaesthetics/intensive care) in a large teaching hospital were recruited. Bespoke learning objectives were developed before the course. The training gap and educational impact were measured using trainee self-assessment of their procedure-based assessment (PBA) levels in a survey after the course. Results Twenty-nine different surgical procedures were performed. A mean training gap of 1.36 PBA levels was reported across all specialties (range: 1–3). The gap was greatest for index procedures, vascular surgery trainees and trainees at grade ST3/ST4. The mean PBA level gain (gap closure) after the course was +1.51 (range: 0–5). The gain was highest for index procedures, anaesthetic trainees and ST3/ST4 trainees. Participants were highly satisfied with the course. Conclusions There is a measurable training gap following COVID-19 disruption to surgical training and intensive cadaveric simulation training with bespoke learning objectives appears to go a long way towards closing this gap. It is feasible to deliver a time and resource efficient cadaveric course for multiple surgical specialties in one sitting. Catch-up simulation is acceptable to trainees, who report that it should be embedded in regular training provision.

Optimizing Surgical Performance Using Preoperative Virtual Reality Planning: A Systematic Review.

Surgery is often a complex process that requires detailed 3-dimensional anatomical knowledge and rigorous interplay between team members to attain ideal operational efficiency or "flow." Virtual Reality (VR) represents a technology by which to rehearse complex plans and communicate precise steps to a surgical team prior to entering the operating room. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of VR for preoperative surgical team planning and interdisciplinary communication across all surgical specialties. A systematic review of the literature was performed examining existing research on VR use for preoperative surgical team planning and interdisciplinary communication across all surgical fields in order to optimize surgical efficiency. MEDLINE, SCOPUS, CINAHL databases were searched from inception to July 31, 2022 using standardized search clauses. A qualitative data synthesis was performed with particular attention to preoperative planning, surgical efficiency optimization, and interdisciplinary collaboration/communication techniques determined a priori. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines were followed. All included studies were appraised for their quality using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) tool. One thousand and ninety-three non-duplicated articles with abstract and full text availability were identified. Thirteen articles that examined preoperative VR-based planning techniques for optimization of surgical efficiency and/or interdisciplinary communication fulfilled inclusion and exclusion criteria. These studies had a low-to-medium methodological quality with a MERSQI mean score of 10.04 out of 18 (standard deviation 3.61). This review demonstrates that time spent rehearsing and visualizing patient-specific anatomical relationshipsin VR may improve operative efficiency and communication across multiple surgical specialties.

Comparing Trends in Medicare Reimbursement and Inflation within Plastic Surgery Subspecialties.

Over the past decade across multiple surgical specialties, Medicare reimbursement rates have remained stagnant, failing to keep pace with inflation. An internal comparison of subspecialties within plastic surgery has not yet been attempted. The goal of this study was to investigate the trends in reimbursement from 2010 to 2020 and compare across the subspecialties of plastic surgery. The Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary was used to extract the annual case volume for the top 80% most-billed CPT codes within plastic surgery. Codes were defined into the following subspecialties: microsurgery, craniofacial surgery, breast surgery, hand surgery, and general plastic surgery. The Medicare physician reimbursement was weighted by case volume. The growth rate and compound annual growth rate were calculated and compared against an inflation-adjusted reimbursement value. On average, inflation-adjusted growth in reimbursement for the procedures analyzed in this study was -13.5%. The largest decrease in growth rate was within the field of microsurgery (-19.2%), followed by craniofacial surgery (-17.6%). These subspecialties also had the lowest compound annual growth rate (-2.11% and -1.91%, respectively). For case volumes, microsurgery increased case volumes by an average of 3% per year, whereas craniofacial surgery increased case volumes by an average of 5% per year. After adjusting for inflation, all subspecialties had a decrease in growth rate. This was particularly evident in the fields of craniofacial surgery and microsurgery. Consequently, practice patterns and patient access may be negatively affected. Further advocacy and physician participation in reimbursement rate negotiation may be essential to adjust for variance and inflation.

Work-related musculoskeletal pain and discomfort in laparoscopic surgeons: an international multispecialty survey.

As laparoscopic surgery is used more widely across the globe and within multiple surgical specialties the potential impact on surgeons is yet to be fully quantified. Maintenance of uncomfortable body positions may lead to work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSD) in surgeons, with potential knock-on effects. An international open online survey of multispecialty laparoscopic surgeons was carried out, designed and reported in accordance with the CHERRIES checklist for internet e-survey research. There was no paid advertising and no incentives offered. A total of 259 surgeons from 9 specialties and 32 countries answered the survey, with 90% reporting pain attributable to performing laparoscopic surgery. All training grades were represented. Longer average operative duration and a greater number of years in practice were both associated with a significantly higher prevalence of pain. Surgeons with a pre-existing injury were significantly more likely to report pain than those without. Twenty per cent of surgeons would consider early retirement owing to pain. The impact on surgeons of performing laparoscopic surgery is significant, even given the limitations of an open survey. Innovations such as robotic surgery and improved ergonomic education may reduce the incidence of WMSD in surgeons, to mitigate both the personal effects on surgeons and the wider effect on the future surgical workforce.

State of the art: Proceedings of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery Summit

Despite the benefits established for multiple surgical specialties, enhanced recovery after surgery has been underused in cardiac surgery. A cardiac enhanced recovery after surgery summit was convened at the 102nd American Association for Thoracic Surgery annual meeting in May 2022 for experts to convey key enhanced recovery after surgery concepts, best practices, and applicable results for cardiac surgery. Topics included implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery, prehabilitation and nutrition, rigid sternal fixation, goal-directed therapy, and multimodal pain management.

The past, present and future of ACS NSQIP-Pediatric: Evolution from a quality registry to a comparative quality performance platform

Quality and process improvement (QI/PI) in children's surgical care require reliable data across the care continuum. Since 2012, the American College of Surgeons’ (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric (NSQIP-Pediatric) has supported QI/PI by providing participating hospitals with risk-adjusted, comparative data regarding postoperative outcomes for multiple surgical specialties. To advance this goal over the past decade, iterative changes have been introduced to case inclusion and data collection, analysis and reporting. New datasets for specific procedures, such as appendectomy, spinal fusion for scoliosis, vesicoureteral reflux procedures, and tracheostomy in children less than 2 years old, have incorporated additional risk factors and outcomes to enhance the clinical relevance of data, and resource utilization to consider healthcare value. Recently, process measures for urgent surgical diagnoses and surgical antibiotic prophylaxis variables have been developed to promote timely and appropriate care. While a mature program, NSQIP-Pediatric remains dynamic and responsive to meet the needs of the surgical community. Future directions include introduction of variables and analyses to address patient-centered care and healthcare equity.