Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale Research Articles

Validation of scores from a telephone administered multiple sclerosis walking scale-12 in persons with multiple sclerosis

BackgroundThe Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12) has typically been delivered through paper-and-pencil or computer-based administration. PurposeThis study examined the validity of inferences from scores derived via a telephone administration of the MSWS-12 applied as part of screening of participants with walking dysfunction into a clinical trial of exercise training in MS. MethodThe MSWS-12 was administered on two occasions separated by approximately 2 weeks through the telephone and then in-person (i.e., computer-based administration). Participants further completed the Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) scale, timed 25-foot walk (T25FW), six-minute walk (6MW), Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), and Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29), and underwent a neurological exam for generating an expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score. The primary set of data (Full Sample) for analyses included all persons who passed the telephone screening for inclusion with MSWS-12 scores between 25 and 75 (N = 374). The secondary set of data (Truncated Sample) included only persons with MSWS-12 scores between 25 and 75 for both the telephone and computer administrations of the MSWS-12 (N = 248). ResultsThe results in the Full Sample indicated a difference in overall and item levels scores between the telephone and computer data collections, and the computer version had higher internal consistency and stronger unidimensionality. Nevertheless, MSWS-12 scores from both modes of administration had comparable correlations with the T25FW, 6MW, EDSS, PDDS, MFIS, and MSIS-29, but the correlation between the two MSWS-12 administrations did not approach unity. There was a systematic difference in scores between telephone and computer administrations across levels of walking dysfunction based on a Bland-Altman plot, and the difference was predicted by MFIS physical, 6MW, and EDSS scores. The comparison of results between the Full and Truncated Samples suggested that the primary analysis might have been influenced by the larger range of scores on the computer than telephone administrations of the MSWS-12. ConclusionThe telephone administration of the MSWS-12 provides an efficient and cost-effective measure of walking dysfunction in persons with MS.

The Cognitive Reserve May Influence Fatigue after Rehabilitation in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Secondary Analysis of the RAGTIME Trial

Cognitive reserve (CR) seems to be an ability to adapt cognitive processes in response to brain disease and may influence rehabilitation outcomes. This is a secondary analysis of the “Robot-Assisted Gait Training versus conventional therapy on mobility in severely disabled progressive MultiplE sclerosis patients” (RAGTIME) trial to investigate the influence of CR on the outcomes after gait rehabilitation in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). We included 53 PwMS and severe gait disability (EDSS 6–7). The participants were randomized into two groups to receive either robot-assisted gait training or overground walking (three times/week over four weeks). CR was evaluated by the Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire (CRIq), which encompasses three sections (CRI Education, CRI Working Activity, and CRI Leisure Time). We stratified the patients using the 115 cut-off CRIq total score of at least a medium-high CR. The outcome measures were Timed 25-Foot Walk, 6 min walking test, Berg Balance Scale, Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale—29, Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale—12, Patient Health Questionnaire—9, and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). After gait rehabilitation, the FSS was significantly improved in those patients with higher CR compared with the others (F = 4.757, p = 0.015). In our study, CR did not affect the gait, balance, disability perception, and depression. Conversely, it positively influenced the fatigue after gait rehabilitation.

Reliability and validity of the 4-meter walk test in patients with multiple sclerosis

BackgroundWalking speed is considered a vital sign of health and better functional outcomes. It is important to assess walking speed both for disease monitoring and before starting rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability, validity, minimal detectable change, and the ideal cutoff time for differentiating patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) who fall from PwMS who do not. MethodsThis study included 43 PwMS (26 female and 17 male) and 36 healthy controls (23 female and 13 male). The 4-meter walk test (4-MWT) was conducted with the 10-meter walk test (10-MWT), timed up and go (TUG) test, dynamic gait index (DGI), timed 25-foot walk (T25-FW), multiple sclerosis walking scale-12 (MSWS-12), and the expanded disability status scale (EDSS). ResultsExcellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.971) was found for the 4-MWT. The SEM value was 0.38 and MDC value was 1.05. The correlations with 4-MWT, 10-MWT, TUG, DGI, T25-FW, MSWS-12, and EDSS were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.001). PwMS had longer 4-MWT times than healthy controls, and PwMS fallers had longer 4-MWT times than non-fallers with PwMS (r between 0.668 and -0.858; p < 0.05 for all). In order to distinguish fallers from non-fallers with PwMS, a 4-MWT cutoff time of 4.14 s was shown to be optimal. ConclusionThe 4-MWT was found to be valid and reliable for PwMS. It is concluded that the 4-MWT is a feasible assessment method for clinical and methodological studies of PwMS with mild to moderate disability.

Results of a feasibility and initial efficacy clinical trial of a high-intensity interval training program using adaptive equipment in persons with multiple sclerosis who have walking disability

BackgroundHigh intensity interval training (HIIT) has been identified as potential stimulus for eliciting health-promoting physical activity in an efficient manner among persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). The current study aimed to examine the feasibility and initial efficacy of a 12-week HIIT program using a recumbent stepper (RSTEP) in persons with MS who have walking disability. Feasibility outcomes of interest included process (i.e., recruitment, adherence, and retention rates), resource (i.e., time and monetary costs), management (i.e., data management and safety reporting assessment), and science (i.e., safety, burden, and treatment effect assessment). We hypothesized that 12-weeks of HIIT will be feasible via meeting a priori benchmarks in process, resource, management, and scientific outcomes. The efficacy outcomes of interest included changes in aerobic fitness, physical activity, walking, upper arm function, cognition, fatigue, and depressive symptoms. We hypothesized that 12 weeks of HIIT would result in improvements in aerobic capacity, walking, upper arm function, cognition, fatigue, and depression. MethodsA pre-post clinical trial design was applied. Participants (N = 16) were recruited and enrolled in the 12-week RSTEP HIIT program who met the following inclusion criteria: age ≥18 years, self-reported diagnosis of MS, Patient Determined Disability Steps scale score 3.0–7.0, relapse free in past 30 days, willing to visit a University Laboratory for study protocol, asymptomatic status for maximal exercise testing, physician approval, and a self-reported ability to speak, read, and understand English. Measures of efficacy outcomes of interest included Six Minute Walk Test (6MW), Timed 25 Foot Walk Test (T25FW), the Brief International Cognitive Assessment in MS (BICAMS), 9-hole peg test (9-HPT), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Fatigue Severity Survey (FSS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ), Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12). Participants completed a graded maximal exercise test for measuring aerobic fitness (VO2peak) and prescription of exercise throughout the intervention. All outcomes were measured at baseline, mid-point (6-weeks), and post-intervention (12-weeks). The intervention involved 12 weeks of supervised, individualized HIIT sessions two times per week using RSTEP. The individual HIIT sessions included 10 cycles of 60 s intervals at the work rate associated with 90 % VO2peak followed by 60 s of active recovery intervals, totaling 20 minutes plus 5-minute warm-up and cool-down periods. Process, resources, management, and scientific feasibility outcomes were examined using descriptive statistics, percentage, and frequency analyses. The efficacy of the intervention was assessed using a 1-factor (Time), repeated measure analysis of variance to identify significant changes over time. ResultsFourteen of 16 participants were retained throughout the full study period and adherence with prescribed exercise sessions was 97 %. Twenty-three staff were comprehensively trained across two sites. There was only one adverse event reported that did not impact participation in the study and overall mean satisfaction rating with the program among participants was 4.7/5. There were statistically significant changes in cognitive processing speed (p = 0.002), GLTEQ (p = 0.005), and MSWS-12 (p = 0.04), but not the other outcomes of fitness, arm function, and walking. Of note, there were large effect sizes noted for peak power output (d = 1.10) and FSS (d = 1.05) despite the lack of statistically significant changes ConclusionFeasibility of a 12-week individualized RSTEP HIIT program was established and participants significantly improved on measures of cognition, physical activity, and walking.

Do depressive and anxiety symptoms influence the construct validity of Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 scores?

Walking dysfunction, depression, and anxiety are prevalent, burdensome, and interrelated outcomes in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS). The 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12) is a common patient-reported outcome (PRO) of walking dysfunction in research and practice involving MS, but the construct validity of its scores might be influenced by symptoms of depression and anxiety. This study examined if symptoms of depression and anxiety influenced the construct validity of MSWS-12 scores. The sample included 189 participants with MS who completed the MSWS-12, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-Depression subscale [HADS-D] and HADS-Anxiety subscale [HADS-A]), 6-minute walk (6MW), and timed 25-foot walk (T25FW). We conducted bivariate correlation analysis to examine the associations between MSWS-12 scores and both the 6MW and T25FW, while controlling for HADS-D and HADS-A scores. MSWS-12 scores were significantly correlated with the 6MW (r = -.752), T25FW (r = .694), HADS-D (r = .405), and HADS-A (r = .235). The correlations between MSWS-12 and 6MW (pr = -.725) and T25FW (pr = .685) did not change when controlling for HADS-D and HADS-A scores. The correlations between MSWS-12 and 6MW (r = -.708 and r = -.726) and T25FW (r = .687 and r = .748) were strong in subsamples with elevated HADS-D and HADS-A scores. Our results strengthen the validity evidence for MSWS-12 scores as a PRO of walking dysfunction in MS, including among those with symptoms of depression and anxiety. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Comparison of patient-reported outcomes of physical activity and accelerometry in people with multiple sclerosis and ambulatory impairment: A cross-sectional study

BackgroundAccelerometers and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) are used to assess physical activity (PA) in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). So far it is unknown, however, whether these assessments represent mobility limitations in pwMS with mild and moderate to severe disability alike. The primary aim of the study was to assess the correlation between accelerometry and International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) scores in pwMS with different degrees of ambulatory impairment. Taken its frequent use into account, the Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ) was investigated as additional PRO. MethodsIn a prospective cohort of pwMS, correlational analyses were performed between the number of daily steps, time spent in light, moderate to vigorous PA (MVPA) and time spent sitting as assessed using accelerometry (ActiGraph®-GT3X), and the respective IPAQ and GLTEQ scores. Additionally, associations of PA with disease-specific characteristics, aerobic capacity (VO2peak), walking assessments (Timed 25-Foot Walk, T25FW; 2-Minute Walk Test, 2MWT) and walking perception (Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12; MSWS-12) were explored. Patient subgroups with mild (Expanded Disability Status Scale; EDSS score <4.0) and moderate to severe disability (EDSS ≥4.0) were analysed for the impact of ambulatory impairment on PA. Multiple linear regression was used to determine predictors of PA. ResultsA total of 56 pwMS completed the study, with a mean (standard deviation, SD) age of 48.4 (10.3) years, disease duration of 14.8 (9.6) years and median (interquartile range) EDSS score of 3.5 (2.0 – 4.4). Moderate to weak correlations were found between daily step count and IPAQ total metabolic equivalent (MET) minutes/week (p < 0.001; r = 0.506), MVPA MET-minutes/week (p < 0.01; r = 0.479) and walking MET-minutes/week (p < 0.05; r = 0.372) in the total cohort. Time spent sitting was inversely correlated with total MET-minutes/week and MVPA MET-minutes/week (p < 0.05; r = -0.358 and r = -0.365). Subgroup analysis revealed, that daily step count was significantly correlated with total MET-minutes/week, MVPA MET-minutes/week and walking MET-minutes/week (p < 0.01, r = 0.569; p < 0.01, r = 0.531 and p < 0.05, r = 0.480, respectively) in the “mild disability” subgroup only, whereas time spent sitting was inversely correlated with total MET-minutes/week (p < 0.05; r = -0.582) in the “moderate to severe disability” subgroup. There was no association between objectively assessed PA and GLTEQ scores in any group. In the total cohort, moderate to weak correlations were found between daily step count and walking assessments (T25FW: p < 0.01, ρ = -0.508; 2MWT: p < 0.01, ρ=0.463) and MSWS-12 (p < 0.001; ρ = -0.609). Moderate to weak correlations were also observed between VO2peak and walking assessments (T25FW: p < 0.01; ρ = -0.516; 2MWT: p < 0.01, ρ=0.480). Multiple linear regression analysis identified disability and VO2peak as predictors of PA (p = 0.045; β=0.25 and p < 0.001; β=0.49). ConclusionSignificant associations of objective PA measurements using accelerometry with IPAQ were found only in pwMS with “mild disability”. In pwMS with “moderate to severe disability”, IPAQ did not reflect the objectively assessed amount of PA. In our cohort, GLTEQ showed no association with objectively assessed PA. Thus, an MS-specific self-reported questionnaire for assessing PA is warranted.

Feasibility of a new intervention addressing group-based balance and high-intensity training, physical activity, and employment in individuals with multiple sclerosis: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Impaired sensorimotor function, reduced physical activity and unemployment are common challenges in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), even when disability is low. CoreDISTparticipation is a new, multidisciplinary intervention delivered across healthcare levels systematically addressing these elements. This study primarily aimed to evaluate the feasibility of CoreDISTparticipation in terms of process, resources, management, and scientific outcomes. The secondary aim was to evaluate initial efficacy in terms of possible short-term effects compared with the usual care on barriers to employment, balance, walking, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and physical activity. This assessor-blinded prospective pilot randomized controlled trial included 29 pwMS [Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS): 0-3.5] randomly allocated to the intervention group (CoreDISTparticipation) (n = 15) or usual care (n = 14). CoreDISTparticipation consists of three phases: (1) hospital outpatient clinic: MS nurse work-focused session and physiotherapist exploring balance; (2) municipality: a digital meeting with pwMS, employer, MS nurse, and physiotherapist addressing employment and physical activity, 4 weeks indoor CoreDIST balance training (60 min × 2/week); and (3) 4 weeks outdoor CoreDIST balance training and high-intensity running/walking (60 min × 2/week). Assessments were undertaken at baseline and at weeks 6 and 11. Primary feasibility metric outcomes were the reporting of process, resources, management, and scientific outcomes. Efficacy measures included evaluation of the Multiple Sclerosis Work Difficulties Questionnaire-23 Norwegian Version (MSWDQ-23NV) and 6 Minute Walk-test as well as the Trunk Impairment Scale-modified Norwegian Version, Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest), Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12, Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 Norwegian Version (MSIS-29NV), ActiGraph wGT3x-BT monitors, and AccuGait Optimized force platform. The statistical analyses included repeated-measures mixed models performed in IBM SPSS Version 29. The primary feasibility metric outcomes demonstrated the need for minor adjustments in regard to the content of the intervention and increasing the number of staff. In regard to the efficacy measures, one person attended no postintervention assessments and was excluded, leaving 28 participants (mean EDSS: 1.8, SD: 1). The mean percentage employment was 46.3 (SD: 35.6) and 65.4 (SD: 39.3) in the CoreDISTparticipation and usual care group, respectively. No between-group differences were found. MSWDQ-23NV demonstrated a within-group difference of 5.7 points from baseline to Week 11 (P = 0.004; confidence interval: 2.2-9.3). Mini-BESTest and MSIS-29NV demonstrated within-group differences. The study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05057338). The CoreDISTparticipation intervention is feasible to support pwMS when the identified feasibility metric outcomes in regard to process, resource, management, and scientific outcome metrics are adjusted to improve feasibility. Regarding efficacy measures, no between-group differences were detected; however, within-group differences in barriers to employment, balance, and HRQoL were detected for the CoreDISTparticipation group. A larger comparative trial is needed to explore between-group differences and should accurately and precisely define usual care and address the identified limitations of this study.

Variability of Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale and Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale Scores in People Without Multiple Sclerosis.

Introduction Many people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) experience problems with mobility at some point in their disease course. The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS) and Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS) are validated patient-reported outcome measures of physical impairment in pwMS. The range of scores on MSIS and MSWS in people without MS (pwoMS) are not well understood. Methods People over the age of 16 who did not have a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) were invited to complete an online survey consisting of a general health questionnaire, MSIS and the MSWS. Scores for MSIS and MSWS from pwoMS were compared to those from a cohort of 35 pwMS from a previous study. Scores for MSIS and MSWS were correlated with age, sex and comorbidities in pwoMS. Results One hundred eighty-nine ambulant pwoMS were recruited (52.5% female), aged over 16 years of age. Ninety-nine percent reported no difficulty with walking, 89.4% were non-smokers, and 14% had a physical co-morbidity. None used a walking aid. For pwoMS, the MSIS score was a mean of 39.14±13.75 (range 29-127), compared to a mean of 77.2±24.94 (range 40-126) for pwMS. For pwoMS, the mean MSWS score was 8.46±16.2 (0-87) compared to a mean of 56.9±28.9 (4-100) for pwMS. There was no significant effect of sex or smoking on MSIS or MSWS scores in pwoMS. Presence of a physical co-morbidity was associated with significantly higher MSIS and MSWS scores in pwoMS. There was a significant correlation of increasing age with increasing MSWS score in pwoMS but no correlation of age with MSIS score. Conclusion There is a wide range of MSWS and MSIS scores in pwoMS. The age and presence of comorbidities influence both MSWS and MSIS scores. Our findings have implications for the selection of control groups for clinical studies in pwMS.

Efficacy of dalfampridine in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A pilot study.

To assess the efficacy of dalfampridine in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. We included 15 consecutive patients, who were started on a treatment of dalfampridine 10 mg twice daily for 2 weeks. Efficacy assessment was based on walking ability improvement using Timed-25-Foot Walk and 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale tests. The mean Timed-25-Foot Walk score was reduced from 14.8 (±2.4) to 11.3 (±1.9) seconds (p = 0.01). The mean score on the 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale was reduced from 41.2 (±3.5) to 31.4 (±3.2) (p = 0.004). Dalfampridine seems to be useful for symptomatic treatment of walking impairment in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.

The Effectiveness of a Single Dry Needling Session on Gait and Quality of Life in Multiple Sclerosis: A Double-Blind Randomized Sham-Controlled Pilot Trial.

Gait disorders are a major cause of disability and reduced health-related quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Dry needling (DN) has demonstrated positive results to improve gait parameters in patients with stroke. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a single session of DN in the gait performance of pwMS. A double-blind parallel randomized sham-controlled pilot trial was conducted. Study participants received a single session of active DN or sham DN in the gastrocnemius medialis muscle. Pre-treatment and immediately post-treatment measurements were taken, as well as at one and four weeks after the intervention. Outcomes related to gait performance (Timed 25-Foot Walk), self-perceived walking capacity (Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale), risk of falls (Timed Up and Go test), disability level (Expanded Disability Status Score) and quality of life (Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 questionnaire and Analogic Quality of Life scale) were evaluated. 18 patients who had multiple sclerosis participated in the study. The group who received active DN showed within-group significant statistical differences immediately after treatment for gait performance (p = 0.008) and risk of falls (p = 0.008), as well as for self-perceived walking capacity at one week (p = 0.017) and four weeks (p = 0.011) and quality of life at four weeks (p = 0.014). Regarding the comparison between groups, only significant results were obtained in the physical domain of the quality of life at four weeks (p = 0.014). DN seems to be a promising therapeutic tool for the treatment of gait disorders in pwMS. However, when results were compared with sham DN, no differences were found.

Providing meaningful interpretation of performance outcome measures by co-calibration with patient-reported outcomes through the Rasch model: illustration with multiple sclerosis measures

ABSTRACT Performance outcome (PerfO) measures are based on tasks performed by patients in a controlled environment, making their meaningful interpretation challenging to establish. Co-calibrating PerfO and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures of the same target concept allow for interpretation of the PerfO with the item content of the PRO. The Rasch model applied to the discretized PerfO measure together with the PRO items allows expressing parameters related to the PerfO measure in the PRO metric for it to be linked to the PRO responses. We applied this approach to two PerfO measures used in multiple sclerosis (MS) for walking and manual ability: the Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW) and the 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT). To determine meaningful interpretation of these two PerfO measures, they were co-calibrated with two PRO measures of closely related concepts, the MS walking scale − 12 items (MSWS-12) and the ABILHAND, using the data of 2,043 subjects from five global clinical trials in MS. The probabilistic relationships between the PerfO measures and the PRO metrics were used to express the response pattern to the PRO items as a function of the unit of the PerfOs. This example illustrates the promises of the co-calibration approach for the interpretation of PerfO measures but also highlights the challenges associated with it, mostly related to the quality of the PRO metric in terms of coverage of the targeted concept. Co-calibration with PRO measures could also be an adequate solution for interpretation of digital sensor measures whose meaningfulness is also often questioned.

Sedentary behaviour and related factors in people with multiple sclerosis

BackgroundSedentary behaviour is a major problem in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). However, little is known about the related factors of sedentary behaviour in MS. Our study aimed to examine the association between sedentary behaviour and physical activity level, fear of falling, and fatigue. MethodDemographic and clinical data have been recorded. Sedentary behaviour was assessed with the Marshall Sitting Questionnaire, physical activity level was evaluated with the Godin Leisure Time Exercise Questionnaire, fear of falling was evaluated with the Fall Efficacy Scale International, and fatigue was evaluated with the modified fatigue impact scale (MFIS). The Timed 25-Foot Walk, 6-Minute Walk Test, Timed Up and Go Test, and 12-Item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale were also used to assess walking and perceived walking disability. ResultsWe recruited 71 pwMS [49 were female (69 %), mean age:38.08 years, median EDSS:1.5]. The mean daily sitting time was 593.54 min (∼10 h). No significant correlation was found between sitting times and demographics, leisure time physical activity, fear of falling, walking, perceived walking disability, and neurological disability level (p > 0.05). Logistic regression analysis indicated that being male increased the risk of sedentary behaviour by 3.08 times, being employed increased the risk of sitting by 4.65 times, and each point increase in MFIS scores resulted in a 1.03-fold elevation in the odds of prolonged sitting. ConclusionThe fact that pwMS, even with a mild disability spend almost 10 h sitting highlights the significance of sedentary behaviour in this population. Developing strategies to address modifiable factors, such as fatigue, may be effective in reducing sedentary behaviour.

Effects of backward walking training on balance, gait, and functional mobility in people with multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled study.

Backward walking training (BWT) can have a positive effect on balance, gait, and functional mobility in neurological diseases; however, the effectiveness of BWT has not been examined in multiple sclerosis (MS). Therefore, the study aimed to investigate the effects of BWT on balance, gait, and functional mobility in people with MS (PwMS). Nineteen PwMS were randomly allocated to either the experimental group (n=10) and the control group (n=9). The experimental group received BWT in addition to conventional walking training (CWT) while the control group only received CWT. Both groups performed training three times a week for 8 weeks. Participants were assessed with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), four square step test (FSST), activities-specific balance confidence scale (ABC), timed 25-foot walk test (T25FW), dynamic gait index (DGI), 3-meter backward walk test (3MBWT), Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12), and timed up and go test (TUG) before and after training. After training, both groups showed significant improvements on the T25FW, and TUG (p<0.05) while only the experimental group showed significant improvements on the BBS, FSST, ABC, DGI, 3MBWT, and MSWS-12 (p<0.05). The experimental group significantly improved more than the control group in all outcomes (p<0.05) except for the T25FW (p=0.202). BWT in addition to CWT is an effective way to improve balance, gait, and functional mobility for PwMS. These results suggest that BWT may be a potentially useful treatment approach when added to CWT in the rehabilitation of MS.

Smartwatch-derived sleep and heart rate measures complement step counts in explaining established metrics of MS severity

BackgroundPassive remote monitoring of patients with MS (PwMS) with sensor-based wearable technologies promises near-continuous evaluation with high ecological validity. Step counts correlate strongly with traditional measures of MS severity. We hypothesized that remote monitoring of sleep and heart rate will yield complementary information. MethodsWe recruited 31 PwMS and 31 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers (HV) as part of the dreaMS feasibility study (NCT04413032). Fitbit Versa 2 smartwatches were worn for 6 weeks and provided a total of 25 features for activity, heart rate, and sleep. Features were selected based on their pairwise intercorrelation (Pearson |r| < 0.6), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥ 0.6 or median coefficient of variation < 0.2) and group comparisons between HV and PwMS with moderate disability (expanded disability status scale (EDSS) ≥ 3.5) (rank-biserial |r| ≥ 0.5). These selected features were correlated with clinical reference tests (EDSS, timed 25-foot walk (T25FW), MS-walking scale (MSWS-12)) in PwMS, and multivariate models adjusted for age, sex, and disease duration were compared. ResultsWe analyzed 28 PwMS (68% female, mean age 44 years, median EDSS 3.0) and 26 HV in our primary analysis. The objectively selected features discriminated well between HV and PwMS with moderate disability with rank-biserial r = 0.83 for Total number of steps, 0.51 for Deep sleep proportion, -0.51 for Median heart rate, 0.85 for Proportion very active, and 0.65 for Total number of floors. In PwMS they correlated strongly with the three clinical reference tests EDSS (strongest Spearman ρ = -0.75 for Proportion very active), T25FW (-0.75 for Total number of floors), and MSWS-12 (-0.72 for Total number of floors). Deep sleep proportion and Median heart rate complemented Total number of steps in explaining the variance of reference tests. ConclusionsActivity, deep sleep and heart rate measures can be derived reliably from smartwatches and contain independent clinically meaningful information about MS severity, highlighting their potential for continuous passive monitoring in both clinical trials and clinical care of PwMS.

Self-assessed Dynamic Gait Index correlates with physical therapist assessed Dynamic Gait Index in people with multiple sclerosis

BackgroundThe Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) is a clinical measure of walking ability comprised of eight walking tasks. In people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) the DGI has demonstrated validity, reliability, and ability to identify fallers. A self-assessed version of the DGI that demonstrates concurrent validity with the original DGI in people with MS would be valuable for remote assessment of walking ability. We therefore developed a questionnaire-based self-assessed version of the DGI (sDGI) that asks participants to self-rate their predicted ability to perform the eight DGI walking tasks. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity and internal consistency of the sDGI in people with MS who had self-reported gait impairment. MethodsWe enrolled 53 ambulatory people with MS with self-reported gait impairment. Participants completed the sDGI, the Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12), the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS), and self-reported their number of falls in the past 3 months. Then, up to 4 weeks later, they completed the DGI by in-person evaluation by a physical therapist (PT). We calculated the internal consistency of the sDGI and concordance between the sDGI and DGI. To determine if cognition impacted concordance, we calculated concordance in the cognitively impaired and non-impaired groups and also tested the difference between groups. We also calculated correlation between the sDGI and the DGI and the MSWS-12. The ability of the sDGI and the DGI to identify fallers was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves. Results51 participants completed the study. They had a mean age of 60.9 (SD 11.5) years, median PDDS of 4.0 (interquartile range 3, 5), 32 % used walking aids, 25 % were cognitively impaired, and 62 % were female. The sDGI was internally consistent (Cronbach's alpha 0.85, 95 % CI 0.76, 0.90) but was not concordant (CCC = 0.45, 95 % CI: 0.28–0.60) with the DGI. Concordance between the sDGI and DGI was not different for cognitively intact versus cognitively impaired individuals. The sDGI was moderately correlated with the DGI (R = 0.64, p < 0.01) and strongly correlated with the MSWS-12 (R = -0.71, p < 0.01). Neither the sDGI nor the DGI identified fallers in this sample. ConclusionThe moderate to strong correlation among the sDGI, DGI and MSWS-12 supports the validity of the sDGI as a measure of walking ability in people with MS. However, because there is poor concordance between the sDGI and the DGI performed in clinic by a PT in both cognitively intact and cognitively impaired participants, the sDGI should not be used as a substitute for the DGI. The sDGI could be used as a screening tool because most participants underestimated their walking performance compared to assessment by a PT so the sDGI would be unlikely to miss poor walking ability. As neither the sDGI nor the DGI identified fallers in this sample, our results do not support using these tools to identify fallers in people with MS and self-reported gait impairment.

Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the trunk impairment scale in people with multiple sclerosis

BackgroundIn order to provide an important measuring tool for the assessment, prognosis of recovery, and treatment of people with multiple sclerosis (PWMS), the aim of this research is to examine the validity and reliability of the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS) in Persian. MethodsThe research included 105 PWMS. The TIS questionnaire was translated and culturally equivalent according to the IQOLA approach. The Intra Class Correlations (ICC) and Cronbach's alpha were used to assess the internal consistency of the questionnaire. Barthel Index (BI), Time Up and Go (TUG), Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 (MSWS-12), and Trunk Control Test (TCT) scores were correlated with the TIS score in order to assess validity. Results86 of 105 participants in this study were female. For several subscales, the ICC correlation coefficient ranged from 0.89 to 0.98. The Cronbach's alpha value of the TIS total score indicates that the TIS questionnaire has quite good internal consistency. (Cronbach's alpha=0.97). The TIS and the MSWS-12, BI, TUG, and TCT questionnaires have correlation coefficients of 0.78, 0.72, 0.60, and 0.71, respectively, indicating strong construct and concurrent validity. ConclusionThe results of the research showed that the TIS in Persian is a relevant and reliable tool for assessing trunk abnormalities in Persian-speaking PWMS.

Feasibility of Low-Load Resistance Training Using Blood Flow Restriction for People With Advanced Multiple Sclerosis: A Prospective Cohort Study.

The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction (BFR) for people with advanced disability due to multiple sclerosis (MS). In this prospective cohort study, 14 participants with MS (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score = 6.0 to 7.0; mean age = 55.4 [SD = 6.2] years; 71% women) were asked to perform 3 lower extremity resistance exercises (leg press, calf press, and hip abduction) bilaterally twice weekly for 8weeks using BFR. Feasibility criteria were as follows: enrollment of 20 participants, ≥80% retention and adherence, ≥90% satisfaction, and no serious adverse events related to the intervention. Other outcomes included knee extensor, ankle plantar flexor, and hip abductor muscle strength, 30-Second Sit-to-Stand Test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed 25-Foot Walk Test, 12-Item MS Walking Scale, Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, Patient-Specific Functional Scale, and daily step count. Sixteen participants consented, and 14 completed the intervention, with 93% adherence overall. All participants were satisfied with the intervention. A minor hip muscle strain was the only intervention-related adverse event. There were muscle strength improvements on the more-involved (16%-28%) and less-involved (12%-19%) sides. There were also changes in the 30-Second Sit-to-Stand Test (1.9 repetitions; 95% CI = 1.0 to 2.8), Berg Balance Scale (5.3 points; 95% CI = 3.2 to 7.4), Timed 25-Foot Walk Test (-3.3seconds; 95% CI = -7.9 to 1.3), Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (-8.8 points; 95% CI = -16.5 to -1.1), 12-Item MS Walking Scale (-3.6 points; 95% CI = -11.5 to 4.4), Patient-Specific Functional Scale (2.9 points; 95% CI = 1.9 to 3.8), and daily step count (333 steps; 95% CI = -191 to 857). Low-load resistance training using BFR in people with MS and EDSS scores of 6.0 to 7.0 appears feasible, and subsequent investigation into its efficacy is warranted. Although efficacy data are needed, combining BFR with low-load resistance training may be a viable alternative for people who have MS and who do not tolerate conventional moderate- to high-intensity training because of more severe symptoms, such as fatigue and weakness. Low-load strength training with BFR was feasible in people who have advanced disability due to MS. Using BFR may provide an alternative for people with MS who do not tolerate higher intensity training due to more severe symptoms, such as fatigue and weakness.

Translation and validation of the multiple sclerosis walking scale 12 for the German population – the MSWS-12/D

BackgroundGait impairment is a relevant problem in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). The Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale 12 (MSWS-12) is a valid Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) to evaluate walking ability in pwMS. The aim of this study was to provide a linguistically valid translation of MSWS-12 into German language (MSWS-12/D) and to evaluate its psychometric properties.MethodsThe MSWS-12 was translated in a process modified from guidelines for the cross-cultural adaption of PROMs, and a pre-test was applied in a small sample of 20 pwMS to evaluate comprehensibility and acceptance. Psychometric properties (floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency, construct validity) were then assessed in 124 pwMS seen at academic MS centers. Construct validity was evaluated against Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and maximum gait speed in the Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW).ResultsAlthough the sample covered a wide spectrum of symptom severity, the majority had rather low levels of disability (EDSS median 2.0) and 6.5% scored EDSS of 0. In this sample, MSWS-12/D showed floor effects (36% with score 0) and for internal consistency, a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.98 was calculated. MSWS-12/D score showed a relevant correlation to EDSS (ρ = 0.73) and T25FW speed (r=-0.72).ConclusionWe provide MSWS-12/D as a linguistically valid German version of MSWS-12. Psychometric properties (acceptance, floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency and construct validity) in pwMS were similar to those described for the original version. This indicates that MSWS-12/D can be applied as equivalent to the original version in German speaking pwMS. Results support the relevance of PROMs to capture patient perception of walking ability in addition to performance-based assessments such as maximum walking speed or maximum walking distance.

The Impact of Relapses on Pain and Quality of Life in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Treated with Corticosteroids.

We assessed the prevalence and risks associated with pain during and after a multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse, and the impact of pain on quality of life (QoL), in MS patients. 117 patients suffering an acute MS relapse were evaluated with clinician- and patient-reported outcomes, including the expanded disability status scale (EDSS), Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29), and MS Walking scale-12 (MSWS-12). Relapse-related pain was assessed via the short-form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire upon first visit (relapse onset) and at 6 weeks after treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone (follow-up visit). Pain was present in 80% of patients at relapse onset. Patients with pain were more impaired physically (higher mean scores on MSIS-29phys and MSWS-12 and lower mean scores on SF-36 role physical, physical, and vitality scales) at relapse and six weeks after. In total, 74% of patients with MS relapse reported a poorer QoL due to pain. A lower psychological well-being was correlated with greater pain (MSIS29psy score). An increased number of prior relapses was a predictor of more pain at relapse onset. Pain was common at the time of MS relapse and improved, but was still significant, six weeks after treatment with corticosteroids. Further studies are required to better understand relapse-related pain.

Results of the MOVE MS Program: A Feasibility Study on Group Exercise for Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis.

Exercise improves a wide range of symptoms experienced by those living with multiple sclerosis (MS) and may foster community and a positive sense of disability identity. However, exercise rates remain low. Sustained exercise participation has the greatest likelihood of improving symptoms and requires a theory-based approach accounting for the barriers faced by people with MS that impede exercise participation long-term. MOVE MS is a once weekly group exercise program based on Social Cognitive Theory supporting long-term exercise participation through peer instruction, behavior change education, multiple exercise modalities, and seated instruction. This feasibility study evaluated MOVE MS with a 7-month trial. The primary scientific outcome was exercise participation and the secondary outcomes were MS symptoms/impact, self-efficacy, depression, anxiety, disability identity, and quality of life, among others. We further conducted semi-structured formative interviews post-intervention. Thirty-three participants began the program. The onset of COVID-19 necessitated a shift toward online delivery. Seventeen participants completed the program. There were non-significant improvements in exercise participation (Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire, baseline mean = 14.2 (SD = 11.8), post-intervention mean = 16.6 (SD = 11.2), F-value = 0.53 (Partial Eta2 = 0.08), and several secondary outcomes (including the MS Impact Scale, MS Walking Scale, and the Leeds MS Quality of Life Scale). Sixteen participants were interviewed, and analysis yielded five themes on program components and feedback. MOVE MS-delivered in-person or online-may be a feasible option for long-term exercise programming for people with MS.