Multiple Primary Melanoma Patients Research Articles

Potential risk factors, clinicopathological features and determinants of survival for multiple primary melanoma patients compared to single primary melanoma: a large single-center Italian study.

Melanoma patients have a high risk of developing subsequent primary melanomas, a condition known as multiple primary melanoma (MPM). We aimed to compare risk factors of patients with MPM and single primary melanoma (SPM). Primary MPM and SPM consecutively treated at the National Cancer Institute in Milan, Italy, from 1978 to 2021 were retrospectively investigated. Demographic and clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed. Multivariate hazard ratios and mortality were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Overall, 9122 patients with SPM and 944 with MPM were included. A total of 1437 and 85 deaths occurred in SPM and MPM group, respectively. Of these, 1315 (14.4%) within SPM patients and 60 (6.4%) in MPM group were melanoma-specific deaths (MSDs). Males had a higher risk for MPM (hazard ratio = 1.29), while age was not associated with MPM (hazard ratio = 0.98). The risk of MPM decreased by about 50% for Breslow thickness >1 mm, and by about 45 and 75% in presence of mitoses and ulceration, respectively. The multivariate hazard ratio of death for MPM compared to SPM patients was 0.85 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.67-1.06), while considering MSD the corresponding hazard ratio was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.71-1.22). Melanoma patients should receive regular follow-up with complete skin examination to detect early subsequent primary melanoma. Patients with more advanced primary have decreased risk of MPM, while males have higher risk. Our study reported no significant difference in mortality between SPM and MPM, but the issue is still open for discussion and further studies.

Clinical Features and Survival of Multiple Primary Melanoma: A Belgian Single Center Cohort.

It remains unclear whether multiple primary melanoma (MPM) patients have a worse survival prognosis compared with single primary melanoma (SPM) patients. To investigate the demographics, histological features, and survival of MPM versus SPM patients. Cox regression analyses compared survival between SPM and MPM patients. Furthermore, demographics and histological features of the MPM cohort were compared with the SPM patients retrieved from dermatopathology files between 2000 and 2019. Out of 3853 melanoma patients, 95 MPM patients were retrieved: 81 with two primary melanomas (85.2%) and 14.8% with three or more. Mean Breslow of the first melanoma was 0.84mm [minimum (min): 0mm, maximum (max): 16mm, standard deviation (SD) 1.77] versus 0.37mm (second MPM) (min: 0mm, max: 2.5mm, SD 0.50) and 0.33mm (third MPM) (min: 0mm, max: 0.6mm, SD 0.22). The mean Breslow for the second MPM was significantly higher for men than women (0.59mm versus 0.27mm). First and second melanoma in MPM patients developed on preexisting melanocytic nevi in 13% and 12%, respectively. In contrast with the mean age of primary melanoma in Belgium for women (58.2years) and men (63.3years), MPM patients developed their first melanoma earlier, at 44.8years and 54.6years, respectively. The mean distribution of anatomical localization of primary and secondary melanoma was highly similar in women, whereas in men a shift towards lower extremities was observed (19% versus 28%). The thicker the primary melanoma was, the sooner the second appeared. Follow-up (2-4/year) versus (1/year) yielded a mean Breslow of 0.29mm and 0.55mm, respectively. Cox regression analysis with time-varying covariate revealed a tendency for a worse prognosis in 5-year survival rates, but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.09). Patient phenotypes were not available on the histological reports. A closer follow-up regimen of MPM versus SPM patients is probably justified.

1330Is Prognosis Worse for People with Multiple Versus Single Primary Melanoma?

Abstract Background Patients with a primary melanoma may develop more than one in their lifetime. It is unclear whether mortality is worse after diagnosis of multiple primary melanoma (MPM) compared with single primary melanoma (SPM). Methods We analysed data from a population-based cohort of 3,869 patients diagnosed with primary in situ or invasive cutaneous melanoma in New South Wales, Australia in 2006-07 and followed up until 2018 (median 11.9 years) using linked mortality and cancer registry data. We compared overall mortality and melanoma-specific mortality for patients with SPM versus MPM, adjusting for other clinico-pathological prognostic indicators, using Cox proportional hazard models. The primary analysis was based on pathological features from the thickest tumour for MPM patients, however sensitivity analyses were performed using the first and last primary melanoma. Results The cohort consisted of 3,869 patients (2,929 SPM and 940 MPM) and 5,504 melanoma lesions (including 2,575 lesions from MPM patients). The primary multivariable analysis showed MPM was associated with lower mortality from all causes and melanoma compared with SPM with a hazard ratio of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.54-0.71, p < 0.001) and 0.37 (95% CI: 0.32-0.43, p < 0.001) respectively. These findings were also supported by the sensitivity analyses. Conclusions The diagnosis of MPM does not worsen mortality compared to a SPM, in fact it was associated with improved survival. This finding might be related to skin examination behaviours, biological or clinical factors. Key messages MPM patients have a better prognosis than SPM patients.

Clinical, pathological and dermoscopic phenotype of MITF p.E318K carrier cutaneous melanoma patients

BackgroundThe p.E318K variant of the Melanocyte Inducing Transcription Factor (MITF) has been implicated in genetic predisposition to melanoma as an intermediate penetrance allele. However, the impact of this variant on clinico-phenotypic, as well as on dermoscopic patterns features of affected patients is not entirely defined. The purpose of our study was to assess the association between the p.E318K germline variant and clinic-phenotypical features of MITF+ compared to non-carriers (MITF−), including dermoscopic findings of melanomas and dysplastic nevi.Methodswe retrospectively analyzed a consecutive series of 1386 patients recruited between 2000 and 2017 who underwent genetic testing for CDKN2A, CDK4, MC1R and MITF germline variants in our laboratory for diagnostic/research purposes. The patients were probands of melanoma-prone families and apparently sporadic single or multiple primary melanoma patients. For all, we collected clinical, pathological information and dermoscopic images of the histopathologically diagnosed melanomas and dysplastic nevi, when available.ResultsAfter excluding patients positive for CDKN2A/CDK4 pathogenic variants and those affected by non-cutaneous melanomas, our study cohort comprised 984 cutaneous melanoma patients, 22 MITF+ and 962 MITF−. MITF+ were more likely to develop dysplastic nevi and multiple primary melanomas. Nodular melanoma was more common in MITF+ patients (32% compared to 19% in MITF−). MITF+ patients showed more frequently dysplastic nevi and melanomas with uncommon dermoscopic patterns (unspecific), as opposed to MITF− patients, whose most prevalent pattern was the multicomponent.ConclusionsMITF+ patients tend to develop melanomas and dysplastic nevi with histopathological features, frequency and dermoscopic patterns often different from those prevalent in MITF− patients. Our results emphasize the importance of melanoma prevention programs for MITF+ patients, including dermatologic surveillance with digital follow-up.

Dermoscopy and confocal microscopy for metachronous multiple melanomas: morphological, clinical, and molecular correlations.

Cutaneous melanoma is one of the most frequent malignancies of the skin in Caucasian populations. Patients who develop cutaneous melanoma are at increased risk of developing a second primary melanoma. The estimated incidence of multiple primary melanoma (MPM) ranges from 1.2% to 8.2% of cases, with a high preponderance of melanomas occurring metachronously. The aim of this study was to describe dermoscopic, microscopic, clinical, and molecular correlations between first and subsequent melanomas in patients with metachronous MPMs. Twenty-four paired melanomas from 12 MPM patients were evaluated for architectural characteristics based on dermoscopy and confocal microscopy, as well as for mutations in BRAF and NRAS genes by Sanger-based sequencing analysis. Specific scores used for classifying features of dermoscopy (global pattern; 7-point check list; ABCD Stolz score) and confocal microscopy (Segura and Pellacani) were compared with genetic and histological data. Consistency in dermoscopic patterns between the primary and subsequent cutaneous melanomas were observed in about two thirds of cases, whereas concordant features based on confocal microscopy were found in only about two fifths of cases. The majority of patients (7/12; 58%) presented consistent BRAF/NRAS mutation patterns between first and subsequent primary melanomas. A significant association between BRAF mutations and Pellacani score was evident. Similarities between the index melanoma and subsequent cutaneous melanomas were observed with regards to dermoscopic features and, to a much less extent, confocal microscopy findings. Our data further indicate that the Pellacani score may be used to predict BRAF mutations.

Heterogeneity of BRAF, NRAS, and TERT Promoter Mutational Status in Multiple Melanomas and Association with MC1R Genotype: Findings from Molecular and Immunohistochemical Analysis

Data on somatic heterogeneity and germline-somatic interaction in multiple primary melanoma (MPM) patients are limited. We investigated the mutational status of BRAF, NRAS, and TERT promoter genes in 97 melanomas of 44 MPM patients and compared molecular and immunohistochemical findings. We further evaluated the association of somatic alterations with the germline MC1R genotype. Mutations in BRAF gene were identified in 41.2% (40/97) of melanomas, in NRAS in 2.1% (2/97), and in TERT promoter in 19.6% (19/97). Distribution of BRAF mutations did not differ across multiple melanomas (P=0.85), whereas TERT promoter changes decreased from first to subsequent melanomas (P=0.04). Intrapatient discrepancy of BRAF mutations among multiple tumors was detected in 14 of 44 MPM patients (32%) and of BRAF/NRAS/TERT promoter genes in 20 of 44 (45%). We observed a high rate of agreement between allele-specific TaqMan assay and immunohistochemistry in BRAFV600E detection (κ=0.83, P<0.01) with 86 of 97 melanomas (88.7%) presenting similar BRAF status. Germline MC1R variants were identified in 81.4% (35/43) of MPM patients with no association of MC1R genotype with somatic mutations or with intrapatient concordance of somatic mutational profile. Our results support the genetic diversity of multiple melanomas and show that somatic heterogeneity is not influenced by inherited MC1R variants. Immunohistochemistry may be useful as an initial screening test.

Common Delayed Senescence of Melanocytes from Multiple Primary Melanoma Patients

Common Delayed Senescence of Melanocytes from Multiple Primary Melanoma Patients

494 Heterogeneous mutational status of melanomas in multiple primary melanoma patients

494 Heterogeneous mutational status of melanomas in multiple primary melanoma patients

CDKN2A mutations could influence the dermoscopic pattern of presentation of multiple primary melanoma: a clinical dermoscopic genetic study.

Patients who develop cutaneous melanoma are at increased risk of developing a second primary melanoma. There are many aetiological reasons by which the risk of a second melanoma increases. Among others, genetic factors may contribute to modulating this risk. The risk of identifying a CDKN2A germline mutation increases with the number of primary melanomas and with the presence of familial history of melanoma. Patients with melanoma are especially encouraged to have regular follow-up visits with their dermatologist to perform clinical and dermatoscopic examination. In particular, dermoscopy could be very useful in multiple primary melanoma (MPM) patients. To analyse the clinical and dermatoscopic features of multiple melanomas, focusing on those features that are more frequently found in the same patient to recognize them earlier and understand whether they appear with the similar peculiar dermatoscopic features, especially in CDKN2A carriers. Medical records of MPM patients were selected from a database including 1065 patients with histopathologically proven melanoma diagnosis, all treated at the dermatology clinic of the University of Florence from 2000 to 2013. Pictures of melanoma were independently and blindly administered to three dermatologist experts in dermoscopy to evaluate the presence or absence of ABCD criteria for each clinical image, and the main pattern for the dermoscopic images. The results were then analyzed and crossed to rate the clinical and dermoscopic features of MPM. Seventy five (7.0%) of 1065 patients included in our database were found to carry an MPM disease. Among them, we selected 12 (16%) patients with three or more MPMs. The presence of the CDKN2A melanoma susceptibility gene was observed in 4/12 (33.33%) patients; two patients presented the C500G and c.5+1delG polymorphisms in the CDKN2A gene. In CDKN2A carriers, each patient showed a similar and specific dermatoscopic pattern in their lesions. Even being aware of the limitations of this study, according to hereditary characters and their modes of transmissions, we could speculate that for each patient with a CDKN2A germline mutation, it is possible to find the same kind of dermoscopical pattern among their melanocytic tumours.

Discrepant alterations in main candidate genes among multiple primary melanomas.

BackgroundAlterations in key-regulator genes of disease pathogenesis (BRAF, cKIT, CyclinD1) have been evaluated in patients with multiple primary melanoma (MPM).MethodsOne hundred twelve MPM patients (96 cases with two primary melanomas, 15 with three, and 1 with four) were included into the study. Paired synchronous/asynchronous MPM tissues (N = 229) were analyzed for BRAF mutations and cKIT/CyclynD1 gene amplifications.ResultsBRAF mutations were identified in 109/229 (48%) primary melanomas, whereas cKIT and CyclinD1 amplifications were observed in 10/216 (5%) and 29/214 (14%) tumor tissues, respectively. While frequency rates of BRAF mutations were quite identical across the different MPM lesions, a significant increase of cKIT (p < 0.001) and CyclinD1 (p = 0.002) amplification rates was observed between first and subsequent primary melanomas. Among the 107 patients with paired melanoma samples, 53 (49.5%) presented consistent alteration patterns between first and subsequent primary tumors. About one third (40/122; 32.8%) of subsequent melanomas presented a discrepant pattern of BRAF mutations as compared to incident primary tumors.ConclusionsThe low consistency in somatic mutation patterns among MPM lesions from same patients provides further evidence that melanomagenesis is heterogeneous and different cell types may be involved. This may have implications in clinical practice due to the difficulties in molecularly classifying patients with discrepant primary melanomas.

Genotype analysis in Hungarian patients with multiple primary melanoma

Multiple primary melanoma patients (MPMps) have better prognosis and are more prone to genetic predisposition than single melanoma patients. We aimed to compare genetic background (CDKN2A, CDK4, MITF, MC1R) of 43 Hungarian MPMps with their clinicopathological data. We observed a higher rate of synchronous first and second melanoma (MM) (49%) and a higher frequency of non-melanoma tumor co-occurrence (42%) than reported previously. CDKN2A mutation frequency was 4.7% (E69G, R99P). We identified a new human MC1R variant (D117G) and reported MC1R variant distributions in Hungarian MMs for the first time. The rare R163Q was exceptionally common among Hungarian MPMps, a variant otherwise frequent in Asia, but not in Europe. MC1R 'R' carriers showed histopathological signs of a more progressive disease than 'r' carriers did; however, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in their second melanomas occurred significantly more frequently. Calculating 5-year overall survival, 'R' carriers showed more unfavourable prognosis (87%) than 'r' carriers did (95%).

Assessment of germline and somatic alterations in main candidate genes among patients with multiple primary melanoma

Background A series of patients with multiple primary melanoma (MPM) has been studied for assessing frequency and distribution of alterations in candidate genes involved in susceptibility (CDKN2A) and pathogenesis (BRAF, cKIT, CyclinD1) of such a disease. Methods Two hundred and twenty-seven genomic DNA samples from paired synchronous and/or asynchronous tumour tissues of 106 MPM patients (92 cases with two, 13 with three, and 1 with four primary melanomas) were screened for somatic mutations in BRAF gene and FISHbased amplifications in cKIT and CyclynD1 genes. For 87 (84%) MPM patients from our series, peripheral blood was available and germline DNAs was analyzed for mutations in p16CDKN2A and p14CDKN2A genes. All mutation analyses we performed by direct automated DNA sequencing. Family history for melanoma was defined according to standardized criteria. Results At somatic level, BRAF mutations were identified in 108/ 227 (48%) primary melanoma tissues, whereas amplification of cKIT and CyclinD1 genes was observed in 8/208 (4%) and 28/204 (14%) analyzed tissue samples, respectively. Considering all types of genetic events, paired samples presented a poorly consistent distribution of somatic alterations in same patients [55/106 (52%) discrepant cases). Among them, 35/106 (33%) patients presented discrepant MPM lesions according to the BRAF mutation status. Among the 87 MPM patients whose germline DNA was available, 8 (9%) of them showed different CDKN2A germline mutations: 7 in p16CDKN2A and 1 in p14CDKN2A. Assessment of family history for melanoma revealed that 13/87 (15%) patients presented at least one additional family member affected; a total of ≥ 3 melanomas in family was observed in 20/87 (23%) cases of our series. The CDKN2A germline mutations were found significantly more frequent in patients with familial history of melanoma (7/13; 54%) compared with patients without (1/74; 1.4%) (P<0.001); analogously, CDKN2A mutations were observed in 1/67 (1.5%) and 7/20 (35%) patients with 2 and 3 or more melanomas in family, respectively (P<0.001). Conclusions The low consistency in mutation patterns at somatic level among MPM lesions from the same patients provide further evidence that melanomagenesis is heterogeneous and molecularly different cell types may participate to the development of multiple melanomas. Our findings on germline DNA indicate that occurrence of at least 3 melanomas (in patients or families) or familial recurrence of melanoma may represent strong indicators to address patients to CDKN2A mutation screening.

Phenotypic Characterization of Nevus and Tumor Patterns in MITF E318K Mutation Carrier Melanoma Patients

A germline polymorphism of the microphthalmia transcription factor (MITF) gene encoding a SUMOylation-deficient E318K-mutated protein has recently been described as a medium-penetrance melanoma gene. In a clinical assessment of nevi from 301 volunteers taken from Queensland, we identified six individuals as MITF E318K mutation carriers. The phenotype for 5 of these individuals showed a commonality of fair skin, body freckling that varied over a wide range, and total nevus count between 46 and 430; in addition, all were multiple primary melanoma patients. The predominant dermoscopic signature pattern of nevi was reticular, and the frequency of globular nevi in carriers varied, which does not suggest that the MITF E318K mutation acts to force the continuous growth of nevi. Excised melanocytic lesions were available for four MITF E318K carrier patients and were compared with a matched range of wild-type (WT) melanocytic lesions. The MITF staining pattern showed a predominant nuclear signal in all sections, with no significant difference in the nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio between mutation-positive or -negative samples. A high incidence of amelanotic melanomas was found within the group, with three of the five melanomas from one patient suggesting a genetic interaction between the MITF E318K allele and an MC1R homozygous red hair color (RHC) variant genotype.

1118PD - Multiple Primary Melanomas from Same Patients Present Discrepant Somatic Alterations in Main Candidate Genes

Background A series of patients with multiple primary melanoma (MPM) were screened for the involvement of the key-regulator genes in susceptibility (CDKN2A) and pathogenesis (BRAF, cKIT, CyclinD1) of such a disease. Methods Genomic DNA from peripheral blood of 63 MPM patients (54 cases with two primary melanomas, 8 with three, and 1 with four) were screened for germline mutations in p16 CDKN2A and p14 CDKN2A genes by automated DNA sequencing. Melanoma families were identified according to standardized criteria: 9 (14%) patients were classified as familial cases. Paired synchronous and/or asynchronous MPM tissues (N = 100) from same patients (N = 46) were analyzed for somatic mutations in BRAF gene and FISH-based amplifications in cKIT and CyclynD1 genes. Results Overall, 6 (10%) different CDKN2A germline mutations were identified: 5 inp1 6 CDKN2A and 1 inp 14 CDKN2A . The age of onset was significantly lower and the number of primary melanomas higher in patients with mutations. CDKN2A mutations were significantly more frequent in patients with familial history of melanoma (5/9; 56%) compared with patients without (1/54; 2%) (P < 0.001), and in patients with more than two melanomas (3/9; 33%) compared with patients with only two melanomas (3/54; 6%) (P = 0.012). The debated A148T polymorphism was found at low level (2/54; 4%) in our series. Regarding genetic alterations at somatic level, BRAF mutations were identified in 36/100 (36%) primary melanoma tissues, whereas amplification of cKIT and CyclinD1 genes was observed in 2/88 (2%) and 10/88 (11%) analyzed tissue samples, respectively. Considering all types of genetic events, paired samples presented a poorly consistent distribution of somatic alterations in same patients (52% consistency). Conclusions Coexistence of MPM and familial recurrence of melanoma as well as the presence of more than two melanomas seem to be strong indications to address patients to CDKN2A mutational screening. The low consistency in genetic patterns of primary tumors from the same patients provide additional evidence that pathogenetic mechanisms of melanomagenesis are heterogeneous and molecularly different cell types may be generated in multiple primary melanoma.

Assessment of germ-line and somatic alterations in main candidate genes among patients with multiple primary melanoma.

8581 Background: We have studied a series of patients with multiple primary melanoma (MPM) for the involvement of the key-regulator genes in susceptibility (CDKN2A) and pathogenesis (BRAF, cKIT, CyclinD1) of such a disease. Methods: Genomic DNA from peripheral blood of 63 MPM patients (54 cases with two primary melanomas, 8 with three, and 1 with four) were screened for germline mutations in p16CDKN2A and p14CDKN2A genes by automated DNA sequencing. Melanoma families were identified according to standardized criteria: 9 (14%) patients were classified as familial cases. Paired synchronous and/or asynchronous MPM tissues (N=100) from same patients (N=46) were analyzed for somatic mutations in BRAF gene and FISH-based amplifications in cKIT and CyclynD1 genes. Results: Overall, 6 (10%) different CDKN2A germline mutations were identified: 5 in p16CDKN2A and 1 in p14CDKN2A. The age of onset was significantly lower and the number of primary melanomas higher in patients with mutations. CDKN2A mutations were significantly more frequent in patients with familial history of melanoma (5/9; 56%) compared with patients without (1/54; 2%) (P&lt;0.001), and in patients with more than two melanomas (3/9; 33%) compared with patients with only two melanomas (3/54; 6%) (P=0.012). The debated A148T polymorphism was found at low level (2/54; 4%) in our series. Regarding genetic alterations at somatic level, BRAF mutations were identified in 36/100 (36%) primary melanoma tissues, whereas amplification of cKIT and CyclinD1 genes was observed in 2/88 (2%) and 10/88 (11%) analyzed tissue samples, respectively. Considering all types of genetic events, paired samples presented a poorly consistent distribution of somatic alterations in same patients (52% consistency). Conclusions: Coexistence of MPM and familial recurrence of melanoma as well as the presence of more than two melanomas seem to be strong indications to address patients to CDKN2A mutational screening. The low consistency in genetic patterns of primary tumors from the same patients provide additional evidence that pathogenetic mechanisms of melanomagenesis are heterogeneous and molecularly different cell types may be generated in multiple primary melanoma.

Risk factors in a cohort of patients with multiple primary melanoma

There are various known familial and environmental risk factors that influence the risk for melanoma. This study sought to define the risk factors for multiple primary melanoma. A telephone survey of patients with multiple primary melanomas was conducted from a private practice in south-east Queensland, in order to examine various risk factors in this cohort. Our findings of high rates of family history of melanoma (37%), and of dysplastic naevi (42%) support the influence of genotype in this high-risk group. A family history of multiple primary melanomas, seen in 17% of our patients, is a risk factor not previously reported in similar cohort studies. Sixty-eight per cent of patients had an equal or lesser degree of invasive malignancy in subsequent melanomas. Most multiple primary melanoma patients in this group (86.6%) were conducting self skin examination at least once per month. With regards to sun-protective behaviour, 85% reported regular sunscreen use and 92% reported regular use of sun-protective clothing; however, fewer had done this in childhood. Enhanced knowledge of the genetic and environmental risk factors for multiple primary melanomas can assist clinicians in assessing risk and planning surveillance of patients.

Direct Evidence on the Immune-Mediated Spontaneous Regression of Human Cancer: An Incentive for Pharmaceutical Companies to Develop a Novel Anti-Cancer Vaccine

To develop an effective pharmaceutical treatment for a disease, we need to fully understand the biological behavior of that disease, especially when dealing with cancer. The current available treatment for cancer may help in lessening the burden of the disease or, on certain occasions, in increasing the survival of the patient. However, a total eradication of cancer remains the researchers' hope. Some of the discoveries in the field of medicine relied on observations of natural events. Among these events is the spontaneous regression of cancer. It has been argued that such regression could be immunologically-mediated, but no direct evidence has been shown to support such an argument. We, hereby, provide compelling evidence that spontaneous cancer regression in humans is immunologically-mediated, hoping that the results from this study would stimulate the pharmaceutical industry to focus more on cancer vaccine immunotherapy. Our results showed that patients with >3 primary melanomas (very rare group among cancer patients) develop significant histopathological spontaneous regression of further melanomas that they could acquire during their life (P=0.0080) as compared to patients with single primary melanoma where the phenomenon of spontaneous regression is absent or minimal. It seems that such regression resulted from the repeated exposure to the tumor which mimics a self-immunization process. Analysis of the regressing tumors revealed heavy infiltration by T lymphocytes as compared to non-regressing tumors (P<0.0001), the predominant of which were T cytotoxic rather than T helper. Mature dendritic cells were also found in significant number (P<0.0001) in the regressing tumors as compared to the non regressing ones, which demonstrate an active involvement of the different arms of the immune system in the multiple primary melanoma patients in the process of tumor regression. Also, MHC expression was significantly higher in the regressing versus the non-regressing tumors (P <0.0001), which reflects a proper tumor antigen expression. Associated with tumor regression was also loss of the melanoma common tumor antigen Melan A/ MART-1 in the multiple primary melanoma patients as compared to the single primary ones (P=0.0041). Furthermore, loss of Melan A/ MART-1 in the regressing tumors significantly correlated with the presence of Melan A/ MART-1-specific CTLs in the peripheral blood of these patients (P=0.03), which adds to the evidence that the phenomenon of regression seen in these patients was immunologically-mediated and tumor-specific. Such correlation was also seen in another rare group of melanoma patients, namely those with occult primary melanoma. The lesson that we could learn from nature in this study is that inducing cancer regression using the different arms of the immune system is possible. Also, developing a novel cancer vaccine is not out of reach.

Association of MC1R variants and risk of melanoma in melanoma-prone families with CDKN2A mutations.

Major risk factors for melanoma include many nevi, especially dysplastic nevi, fair pigmentation, freckling, poor tanning ability, and germ line mutations in the CDKN2A, CDK4, or MC1R genes. We evaluated the relationship between MC1R and melanoma risk in CDKN2A melanoma-prone families with extensive clinical and epidemiologic data. We studied 395 subjects from 16 American CDKN2A families. Major melanoma risk factors were assessed by clinical examination or questionnaire; MC1R was sequenced. Odds ratios were estimated by unconditional and conditional logistic regression models. We examined the distribution of MC1R variants and median ages at melanoma diagnosis in multiple primary melanoma (MPM) and single primary melanoma (SPM) patients. Presence of multiple MC1R variants was significantly associated with melanoma, even after adjustment for major melanoma risk factors. All 40 MPM patients had at least one MC1R variant; 65% of MPM patients versus only 17% of SPM patients had at least two MC1R variants (P < 0.0001). For all 69 melanoma patients combined, as well as the 40 MPM patients, there was a statistically significant decrease in median age at diagnosis as numbers of MC1R variants increased (P = 0.010 and P = 0.008, respectively). In contrast, no significant reduction in age at melanoma diagnosis was observed for SPM patients (P = 0.91). The current study suggests that the presence of multiple MC1R variants is associated with the development of multiple melanoma tumors in patients with CDKN2A mutations. Additional studies are needed to confirm these findings and to explore the mechanisms that may contribute to this relationship.

Role of the CDKN2A Locus in Patients With Multiple Primary Melanomas

We have studied a consecutive case series of patients with multiple primary melanoma (MPM) for the involvement of the melanoma susceptibility loci CDKN2A and CDK4. One hundred four MPM patients (81 patients with two primary melanomas, 14 with three, five with four, one with five, two with six, and one with seven) were included. Seven different CDKN2A germline mutations were identified in 17 patients (16.3%). In total, we identified 15 CDKN2A exon 2, one exon 1alpha missense mutation, and one exon 1beta frameshift mutation. The age of onset was significantly lower and the number of primary melanomas higher in patients with mutations. CDKN2A mutations were more frequent in patients with familial history of melanoma (35.5%) compared with patients without (8.2%), with a relative risk (RR) of 4.32 (95% CI, 1.76 to 10.64; P = .001), and in patients with more than two melanomas (39.1%) compared with patients with only two melanomas (10%) with an RR of 3.29 (95% CI, 1.7 to 6.3; P = .002). The A148T polymorphism was more frequent in patients with MPMs than in the control population (P = .05). A variant of uncertain significance, A127S, was also detected in one patient. No CDK4 mutations were identified, suggesting that it has a low impact in susceptibility to MPM. MPM patients are good candidates for CDKN2A mutational screening. These patients and some of their siblings should be included in a program of specific follow-up with total body photography and digital dermoscopy, which will result in the early detection of melanoma in this subset of high-risk patients and improve phenotypic characterization.

Early onset may predict G101W CDKN2A founder mutation carrier status in Ligurian melanoma patients

Although the presence of multiple cases of melanoma on the same side of a family is the best predictor of germline CDKN2A mutation, other features (i.e. early age at onset) may be useful to identify carriers. We analysed the records of 682 hospital-based Ligurian melanoma patients. Of these, 238 cases (34 familial, 14 non-familial multiple primary and 190 non-familial single primary melanomas) were consecutively enrolled for screening of the CDKN2A and CDK4 genes. Screening of the 34 familial patients revealed that nine were carriers of the CDKN2A G101W founder mutation. Of the 14 non-familial multiple primary melanoma patients, three carried the G101W founder mutation and one the P48T mutation. For the non-familial patients with a single melanoma, 17 of 190 carried germline CDKN2A mutations, with most (16/17) carrying the G101W Ligurian founder mutation and one a novel single base pair substitution, D74Y. The effect of mutation on age at diagnosis was significant (P=0.012) after correcting for melanoma type (familial or non-familial), number of primaries (single or multiple), gender and disease occurrence (incident or prevalent). Early age at onset may be a good predictor of CDKN2A mutation in Liguria, where the G101W founder mutation is prevalent among melanoma patients, independent of family history.