Multiple Daily Insulin Injections Research Articles

Neonatal outcomes in women with diabetes mellitus — analysis of DAPSY data

BACKGROUND: Hyperglycemia in pregnancy is associated with short- and long-term implications for children. Nevertheless, the effects of different types of diabetes mellitus and treatment methods on the neonatal outcomes are to be investigated. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the contribution of different types of maternal diabetes mellitus to the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included women (n = 3261) who delivered at the Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott, Saint Petersburg, Russia in 2008–2017. The following comparison groups were used: type 1 diabetes mellitus (n = 506; 1a, continuous subcutaneous insulin injections; 1b, multiple daily insulin injections), type 2 diabetes mellitus (n = 229; 2a, diet; 2b, insulin therapy), gestational diabetes mellitus (n = 2387; 3a, diet; 3b, insulin therapy), and control (n = 139). The main birth outcomes assessed included weight and length of newborns, Apgar score at birth and at 5 minutes after birth, and pathological conditions such as fetal macrosomia, syndrome of infant of mother with gestational diabetes mellitus or diabetic mother (P70.0–P70.1), light (P05.0) or small for gestational age (P05.1), intrauterine growth restriction, prematurity (P07), neonatal hypoglycemia (P70.4), and neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (P22). The secondary birth outcomes assessed included birth trauma (P10–P15), stillbirth (P95), disturbances of cerebral status of newborn (P91), and congenital malformations, deformations and chromosomal abnormalities (Q00–Q99). RESULTS: Pregestational diabetes mellitus is strongly associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. Type 1 diabetes mellitus women had the highest risks for fetal macrosomia and diabetic fetopathy, neonatal hypoglycemia, prematurity, and congenital malformations (odds ratio 3.54, 20.2, 5.59, 4.24 and 3.92 respectively). In type 2 diabetes mellitus patients, the risks of low birth weight, intrauterine growth restriction and birth trauma (odds 9.14, 5.42 and 6.3 respectively) were higher. For women with gestational diabetes mellitus, these risks were lower. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the major neonatal pathology in patients with different types of diabetes mellitus, taking into account the treatment method. Preconception care and optimal glycemic control are necessary to reduce the risk of obstetric and perinatal complications in women with pregestational types of diabetes mellitus. Further research into the health status of this cohort of children at a later age is required.

Addressing the Burden of Multiple Daily Insulin Injections in Type 2 Diabetes with Insulin Pump Technology: A Narrative Review.

The growing prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains a leading health concern in the US. Despite new medications and technologies, glycemic control in this population remains suboptimal, which increases the risk of poor outcomes, increased healthcare resource utilization, and associated costs. This article reviews the clinical and economic impacts of suboptimal glycemic control in patients on basal-bolus insulin or multiple daily injections (MDI) and discusses how new technologies, such as tubeless insulin delivery devices, referred to as "patch pumps", have the potential to improve outcomes in patients with T2D.

Impact of the use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily insulin injections in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Impact of the use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily insulin injections in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus

Efficacy of automated insulin delivery in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Automated insulin delivery (AID) devices have shown to be a promising treatment to improve glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). However, its efficacy in pregnant women with T1DM remains uncertain. PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing AID to standard care (SC), defined as use of sensor-augmented pump and multiple daily insulin injections. Outcomes included time in range (TIR), nocturnal TIR, time in hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic ranges, among others. Sensitivity and trial sequential analyses (TSA) were performed. CRD42023474398. We included five RCTs with a total of 236 pregnant women, of whom 117 (50.6%) received AID. There was a significant increase in nocturnal TIR (mean difference [MD] 12.69%; 95% CI 8.74-16.64; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%) and a decrease in glucose variability (standard deviation of glucose; MD -2.91; 95% CI -5.13 to -0.69; p = 0.01; I2 = 0%). No significant differences were observed for TIR, HBGI, LGBI, mean glucose and time spent in hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Regarding TSA, the statistical significance obtained in nocturnal TIR was conclusive and with minimal risk of a type I error. Our findings suggest that AID systems can significantly improve nocturnal glycemic control and potentially reduce glycemic variability in pregnant women with T1DM, with no effect in the risk of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia compared with current insulin treatments.

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injection therapy in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes.

The study aimed to compare glycemic control and pregnancy outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) using multiple daily injection therapy (MDI) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and to compare outcomes of women treated with long-acting insulin or neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH). This multicenter prospective cohort study involved women with pregestational T1DM treated with MDI and CSII. Primary outcome was glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) before and during pregnancy. Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal outcomes and quality of life. Of the 121 studied women, the average age was 28.48 years, and the average body mass index was 21.29 kg/m2 at conception and 26.32 kg/m2 at delivery. Of the studied women, 78.51% had planned pregnancy. Women treated with MDI and CSII had comparable HbA1c before pregnancy or in the first and second trimesters. In the third trimester, women on CSII therapy had significantly lower HbA1c (6.07 ± 0.62 vs 6.20 ± 0.88%, p = .017), higher HbA1c on-target rate (71.43% vs 64.62%, p = .030), and greater decline of HbA1c from preconception to the third trimester (-0.65 vs -0.30%, p = .047). Fewer daily insulin requirements were observed in those used CSII compared with MDI-treated women (0.60 ± 0.22 vs 0.73 ± 0.25 U/kg/day, p = .004). Newborns born of mothers treated with the CSII method were more likely to have neonatal jaundice (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-6.57) and neonatal intensive care unit (adjusted OR 3.73, 95%CI 1.24-11.16), and women on CSII had lower scores in patient-reported quality of life (p = .045). In the MDI group, those receiving long-acting insulin had nonsignificant lower HbA1c and higher HbA1c on-target rate in the second and third trimesters, compared with those treated with NPH. Insulin pump users may achieve better glycemic control than multiple daily insulin injections, which did not substantially improve pregnancy outcome.

The IDEAL (Insulin therapy DE-intensificAtion with iglarLixi) Randomised Controlled Trial-Study Design and Protocol.

Multiple daily injection insulin regimen (MDI) represents the most intensive insulin regimen used in the management of people with type 2 diabetes (PwT2D). Its efficacy regarding glycaemic control is counterbalanced by the increased risk of hypoglycaemia, frequently observed tendency to weight gain and necessity for frequent glucose monitoring. Recent introduction of novel antidiabetic medications with pleiotropic effects reaching far beyond the reduction of glycaemia (HbA1c), such as the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), has significantly widened the therapeutic options available for management of T2D. Consequently, there is currently asubstantial number of PwT2D for whom the MDI regimen was initiated at a time when no other options were available. Yet, in present times, these individuals could benefit from simplified insulin regimens ideally taking advantage of the beneficial effects of the novel classes of antidiabetic medications. iGlarLixi (Suliqua®) is a once-daily fixed-ratio combination of basal insulin analogue glargine 100U/ml and a GLP-1 RA lixisenatide. Insulin therapy DE-intensificAtion with iglarLixi (IDEAL) is a six-centre, open-label, parallel-group, active comparator, phase IV randomised controlled trial with a 24-week active treatment period examining the efficacy and safety of MDI regimen de-intensification with once-daily administration of iGlarLixi versus MDI regimen continuation in PwT2D on a backgroud therapy with metformin ± sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor. The primary objective is to compare the effects of MDI therapy de-intensification with iGlarLixi versus MDI regimen continuation regarding glycaemic control (HbA1c). Secondary objectives include detailed evaluation of the effects of MDI regimen de-intensification with iGlarLixi on glycaemic control using standardised continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics and self-monitoring of plasma glucose. Furthermore, body weight and body composition analysis, quality of life and safety profile are evaluated. ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04945070.

Continuous glucose monitoring with structured education in adults with type 2 diabetes managed by multiple daily insulin injections: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of stand-alone intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) with or without a structured education programme and blood glucose monitoring (BGM) in adults with type 2 diabetes on multiple daily insulin injections (MDI). In this 24 week randomised open-label multicentre trial, adults with type 2 diabetes on intensive insulin therapy with HbA1c levels of 58-108 mmol/mol (7.5-12.0%) were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to isCGM with a structured education programme on adjusting insulin dose and timing according to graphical patterns in CGM (intervention group), isCGM with conventional education (control group 1) or BGM with conventional education (control group 2). Block randomisation was conducted by an independent statistician. Due to the nature of the intervention, blinding of participants and investigators was not possible. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c from baseline at 24 weeks, assessed using ANCOVA with the baseline value as a covariate. A total of 159 individuals were randomised (n=53 for each group); 148 were included in the full analysis set, with 52 in the intervention group, 49 in control group 1 and 47 in control group 2. The mean (± SD) HbA1c level at baseline was 68.19±10.94 mmol/mol (8.39±1.00%). The least squares mean change (± SEM) from baseline HbA1c at 24 weeks was -10.96±1.35 mmol/mol (-1.00±0.12%) in the intervention group, -6.87±1.39 mmol/mol (-0.63±0.13%) in control group 1 (p=0.0367 vs intervention group) and -6.32±1.42 mmol/mol (-0.58±0.13%) in control group 2 (p=0.0193 vs intervention group). Adverse events occurred in 28.85% (15/52) of individuals in the intervention group, 26.42% (14/53) in control group 1 and 48.08% (25/52) in control group 2. Stand-alone isCGM offers a greater reduction in HbA1c in adults with type 2 diabetes on MDI when education on the interpretation of graphical patterns in CGM is provided. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04926623. This study was supported by Daewoong Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Beyond HbA1c: Identifying Gaps in Glycemic Control Among Children and Young People with Type 1 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

To describe continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) derived glycemic variables, and study their association with HbA1c and socio-economic factors in young people with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Ninety-two participants [age 15.7 ± 5.0 y (mean ± SD), HbA1c 8.0 ± 1.5% (mean ± SD)] wore a professional CGM sensor for 14 d. Median (IQR) time in range (TIR) was 41 (18)%. Participants spent 41 ± 20% of their day in hyperglycemia (>180mg/dl), and 14 (13)% in hypoglycemia (<70mg/dl). High glycemic variability (percent CV >36%) was seen in 92% participants. Older age at diagnosis was associated with higher TIR (β = 0.267, p = 0.01), lower time above range (TAR) (β = -0.352, p <0.001), but higher time below range (TBR) (β = 0.274, p = 0.006). The use of NPH vs. glargine basal insulin was associated with higher TBR (β = -0.262, p = 0.009) but lower TAR (β = 0.202, p = 0.041). HbA1c showed negative correlation with TIR (r= -0.449, p <0.001) and TBR (r= -0.466, p <0.001) and positive correlation with TAR (r = 0.580, p <0.001) and mean glucose (r = 0.589, p <0.001). These data demonstrate wide gaps between the recommended vs. real world glycemic variables in patients with T1DM in thisregionon multiple daily insulin injections. CGM identifies glycemic variability and complements HbA1c in improving glycemic control.

RETINAL MICROVASCULOPATHY WITH DIFFERENT INSULIN INFUSION THERAPIES IN CHILDREN WITH TYPE 1 DIABETES MELLITUS WITHOUT CLINICAL DIABETIC RETINOPATHY.

To explore the characteristics and associated factors of retinal microvasculopathy and neurodegeneration with different insulin therapies in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) but without diabetic retinopathy. Forty-one children with T1DM with multiple daily insulin injections (MDI), 22 children with T1DM with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, and 62 age-matched normal control children were enrolled. SPECTRALIS Optical coherence tomography was used to scan 6×6 mm square area of posterior retina. The vessel density of superficial vascular plexus, intermediate capillary plexus, and deep capillary plexus in T1DM-MDI group were all significantly lower than those in the T1DM-CSII and control groups (0.39 ± 0.05 vs. 0.44 ± 0.04 and 0.42 ± 0.06, P < 0.001; 0.26 ± 0.04 vs. 0.30 ± 0.02 and 0.28 ± 0.04, P = 0.003; 0.30 ± 0.04 vs. 0.33 ± 0.04 and 0.32 ± 0.04, P = 0.027). In T1DM-MDI group, lower vessel density of superficial vascular plexus was associated with higher hemoglobin A1c (r = -0.377, P = 0.015). Foveal avascular zone morphology index in T1DM-MDI and T1DM-CSII groups were smaller than that in the control group (0.63 ± 0.11 and 0.63 ± 0.12 vs. 0.69 ± 0.15, P = 0.040). There was no statistically significant difference in the thickness of the retina among the three groups ( P > 0.05). The vessel density of posterior retina was lower in children with T1DM with MDI than in healthy control children and associated with higher hemoglobin A1c. There was a significant difference on vessel density betweenT1DM-MDI and T1DM-CSII, with the similar hemoglobin A1c. This study suggested that optical coherence tomography angiography could be beneficial for the detection of retinal abnormalities in children with early T1DM, and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion may be a better choice than MDI for children with T1DM to prevent the retinal complication.

Predictive value of postprandial C-peptide for utilizing multiple daily injection therapy in type 2 diabetes.

Multiple daily injection (MDI) insulin therapy is an effective method of glycemic control and appropriate assignment to MDI therapy could minimize the risks of hypoglycemia and weight gain. The aim of the present study was to identify factors associated with indication for MDI therapy in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). We recruited 360 participants with T2DM that were admitted to the Endocrinology Department of Peking University People's Hospital between August 2017 and July 2018. They first underwent intensive insulin therapy, then were switched to an optimized, simpler insulin treatment that aimed to maintain fasting blood glucose between 4.4 and 7.2 mmol/L, without episodes of hypoglycemia. The baseline characteristics of groups administering either MDI or basal/premix insulin were compared and multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the odds ratios (ORs) for factors associated with MDI therapy. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were then used to identify independent predictors of MDI insulin regimen efficacy. The mean age of the participants was 57.6 ± 12.9 years, and diabetes duration was 14.2 ± 8.2 years. Two hundred and sixty-seven participants administered basal/premix insulin and 93 underwent MDI therapy, of whom 61.8% and 46.2% were male, respectively (p = 0.01). The duration of diabetes was significantly longer in the MDI group (13.1 ± 7.7 years vs. 17.3 ± 8.7 years; p < 0.01). Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was higher in the MDI group than in the basal/premix group (8.3 [6.7, 11.3] mmol/L vs. 7.2 [5.7, 9.3] mmol/L; p < 0.01), while the postprandial C-peptide concentration (PCP) was significantly lower in the MDI group (2.6 [1.8, 3.5] ng/mL) compared to the basal/premix group (3.6 [2.5, 6.2] ng/mL, p < 0.01. Multivariable logistic regression analysis suggested that diabetes duration and FPG were positively associated with MDI therapy: OR (95% confidence interval [CI]) 1.06 (1.02, 1.10) and 1.12 (1.02, 1.24), respectively. In addition, PCP was negatively associated with MDI therapy (0.72 [0.60, 0.86]). ROC analysis suggested that a PCP of < 3.1 ng/mL predicted MDI therapy with 59.6% sensitivity and 72.1% specificity. The results of our study suggest that longer diabetes duration, higher FPG, and lower PCP were associated with necessity for MDI insulin regimen. These findings should assist with the personalization of insulin treatment.

Associations between daily step count classifications and continuous glucose monitoring metrics in adults with type 1 diabetes: analysis of the Type 1 Diabetes Exercise Initiative (T1DEXI) cohort.

Adults with type 1 diabetes should perform daily physical activity to help maintain health and fitness, but the influence of daily step counts on continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics are unclear. This analysis used the Type 1 Diabetes Exercise Initiative (T1DEXI) dataset to investigate the effect of daily step count on CGM-based metrics. In a 4 week free-living observational study of adults with type 1 diabetes, with available CGM and step count data, we categorised participants into three groups-below (<7000), meeting (7000-10,000) or exceeding (>10,000) the daily step count goal-to determine if step count category influenced CGM metrics, including per cent time in range (TIR: 3.9-10.0 mmol/l), time below range (TBR: <3.9 mmol/l) and time above range (TAR: >10.0 mmol/l). A total of 464 adults with type 1 diabetes (mean±SD age 37±14 years; HbA1c 48.8±8.1 mmol/mol [6.6±0.7%]; 73% female; 45% hybrid closed-loop system, 38% standard insulin pump, 17% multiple daily insulin injections) were included in the study. Between-participant analyses showed that individuals who exceeded the mean daily step count goal over the 4 week period had a similar TIR (75±14%) to those meeting (74±14%) or below (75±16%) the step count goal (p>0.05). In the within-participant comparisons, TIR was higher on days when the step count goal was exceeded or met (both 75±15%) than on days below the step count goal (73±16%; both p<0.001). The TBR was also higher when individuals exceeded the step count goals (3.1%±3.2%) than on days when they met or were below step count goals (difference in means -0.3% [p=0.006] and -0.4% [p=0.001], respectively). The total daily insulin dose was lower on days when step count goals were exceeded (0.52±0.18 U/kg; p<0.001) or were met (0.53±0.18 U/kg; p<0.001) than on days when step counts were below the current recommendation (0.55±0.18 U/kg). Step count had a larger effect on CGM-based metrics in participants with a baseline HbA1c ≥53 mmol/mol (≥7.0%). Our results suggest that, compared with days with low step counts, days with higher step counts are associated with slight increases in both TIR and TBR, along with small reductions in total daily insulin requirements, in adults living with type 1 diabetes. The data that support the findings reported here are available on the Vivli Platform (ID: T1-DEXI; https://doi.org/10.25934/PR00008428 ).

Diabetes Technology in People with Type 2 Diabetes: Novel Indications.

Diabetes technology has been continuously evolving. Current versions of continuous glucose monitors (CGM) use minimally invasive designs, monitor glucose values with high accuracy, and can be used to guide insulin dosing. Extensive evidence supports the use of diabetes technology for monitoring and insulin administration in people with type 1 diabetes. However, there is emerging evidence for people with type 2 diabetes. In this review, we present the different technological devices used to monitor glucose and deliver insulin and the evidence supporting their use in people with type 2 diabetes. The use of CGMs in people with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin or non-insulin therapies has been associated with improvements in glycemic control and time spent in hypoglycemia. Smart insulin pens and smart connected devices are options to track compliance and guide insulin delivery in people who do not require insulin pump therapy. Mechanical patch pumps can be used to reduce the burden of multiple daily insulin injections. Automated insulin delivery algorithms improve glycemic control without an increase in hypoglycemia. The use of technology in the management of type 2 diabetes generates glycemic data previously inaccessible, reduces barriers for insulin initiation, improves glycemic control, tracks adherence to therapy, and improves user satisfaction.

Real-World Evidence of Off-Label Use of Commercially Automated Insulin Delivery Systems Compared to Multiple Daily Insulin Injections in Pregnancies Complicated by Type 1 Diabetes.

Aims: To compare glycemic control and maternal-fetal outcomes of women with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using hybrid closed loop (HCL) versus multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) plus continuous glucose monitoring. Methods: Multicenter prospective cohort study of pregnant women with T1D in Spain. We evaluated HbA1c and time spent within (TIR), below (TBR), and above (TAR) the pregnancy-specific glucose range of 3.5-7.8 mmol/L. Adjusted models were performed for adverse pregnancy outcomes, including baseline maternal characteristics and center. Results: One hundred twelve women were included (HCL n = 59). Women in the HCL group had a longer duration of diabetes and higher rates of prepregnancy care. There was no between-group difference in HbA1c in any trimester. However, in the second trimester, MDI users had a greater decrease in HbA1c (-6.12 ± 9.06 vs. -2.16 ± 7.42 mmol/mol, P = 0.031). No difference in TIR (3.5-7.8 mmol/L) and TAR was observed between HCL and MDI users, but with a higher total insulin dose in the second trimester [+0.13 IU/kg·day)]. HCL therapy was associated with increased maternal weight gain during pregnancy (βadjusted = 3.20 kg, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-5.50). Regarding neonatal outcomes, newborns of HCL users were more likely to have higher birthweight (βadjusted = 279.0 g, 95% CI 39.5-518.5) and macrosomia (ORadjusted = 3.18, 95% CI 1.05-9.67) compared to MDI users. These associations disappeared when maternal weight gain or third trimester HbA1c was included in the models. Conclusions: In a real-world setting, HCL users gained more weight during pregnancy and had larger newborns than MDI users, while achieving similar glycemic control in terms of HbA1c and TIR.

Multiple daily injection insulin regimen is an effective, and more economical, alternative to continuous insulin infusion for type 1 diabetics

A clinical decision report using: Heller S, White D, Lee E, et al. A cluster randomised trial, cost-effectiveness analysis and psychosocial evaluation of insulin pump therapy compared with multiple injections during flexible intensive insulin therapy for type 1 diabetes: the REPOSE Trial. Health Technol Assess. 2017 Apr;21(20):1-278. https://doi.org/10.3310/hta21200 for a patient with type 1 diabetes.

Perioperative Insulin Pump Therapy Decreases Readmission Risk and Improves Outcomes in Patients with Diabetes.

To evaluate the impact of temporary insulin pump use during hospitalization on glycemia, postoperative complications, and cost/utilization in perioperative patients with diabetes. Patients (n=159) with type 2 diabetes and hospitalized for elective surgery were recruited from three hospitals. Subjects were categorized into the insulin pump group and the multiple daily subcutaneous insulin injection group according to their treatment therapy. Data were collected at admission, discharge, and 3 months post-discharge. Subjects in the CSII group who were still on insulin therapy transitioned from CSII to MDII; however, their daily insulin dosages were lower than those in the MDII group (15.31±10.98 U/d vs. 23.48±17.02 U/d, P=0.015) after discharge. In terms of medical costs, the CSII group had significantly higher hospitalization costs than the MDII group (112.36±103.43 thousand RMB vs. 82.65±77.98 thousand RMB, P=0.043). After 3 months, the CSII group had significantly lower outpatient costs than the MDII group (3.17±0.94 thousand RMB vs. 3.98±1.76 thousand RMB, P ˂ 0.001). In the MDII group, 10 patients reported severe postoperative complications requiring re-hospitalization; there were no similar reports in the CSII group. Temporary use of insulin pump therapy for perioperative patients with diabetes results in a reduction in blood glucose and blood glucose fluctuation during hospitalization, HbA1c, and the risk of postoperative complication and readmission, thus significantly decreasing costs in this complex patient cohort. Further work is needed to better understand indications for utilizing pump therapy based on diabetes phenotype and the complexity of planned surgical intervention.

Diabetes Technology in Pregnant Women with Type 1 Diabetes—Distribution and Effects on Glycemic Regulation and Perinatal Outcomes

Pregnancies complicated by type 1 diabetes (TID) are associated with an increased risk of obstetric and neonatal adverse outcomes. Optimal glycemic control prior to and through pregnancy is crucial to reduce complications. The use of diabetes technology is rapidly increasing. The aim of the study was to investigate the use and effects of diabetes technology in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. A retrospective cohort study was conducted; 84 women were included in the analysis and were divided into subgroups according to their glucose monitoring method and insulin delivery method. HbA1c values declined during pregnancy in all subgroups with no significant difference between the subgroups. A difference was, however, found in birth weight z-scores. Women using a sensor and an insulin pump had larger babies compared to women without these treatment modalities. The results of the study indicate that diabetes technology, including insulin pumps and/or glucose sensors are not superior to self-monitoring blood glucose measurement and multiple daily injection insulin therapy, which is comforting in the light of the unequal access to health benefits.

Therapeutic inertia in treatment of older adults with type II diabetes at high risk for hypoglycemia

Patients 80 years or older with HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) treated with multiple daily insulin injections had low rates of rapid-acting insulin deprescription and initiation of diabetes medications with lower risk of hypoglycemia. Further investigation is needed to elucidate factors contributing to potentially inappropriately aggressive treatment of these patients.

Evaluating the effects of permanent subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily insulin injections on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on clinical trials

Background. Diabetes is one of the most common chronic and metabolic diseases. This systematic review and meta-analysis study aimed to compare the effects of multiple daily insulin injections against permanent subcutaneous insulin injections on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels in type 2 diabetic patients. Methods. Studies that compared the impacts of multiple daily insulin injections against permanent subcutaneous insulin injections on HbA1c levels and were published until the end of 2022 in international databases were searched and retrieved (nine randomized clinical trial studies). The Chi-squared test and I2 were used to determine the presence and size of heterogeneity. Results. The results of the analysis demonstrated that compared to the group of multiple daily insulin injections, HbA1c was significantly reduced in the group of permanent subcutaneous insulin injections, so that the standardized mean difference was equal to -0.26 (95% confidence interval: -0.46– -0.06 P=0.025). According to the results of Egger’s (P=0.333) and Begg’s (P=0.667) tests, publication bias was not observed in this study. Conclusion. Based on the available evidence, permanent subcutaneous injection of insulin could be significantly successful in reducing and controlling the level of HbA1c because the patients in the permanent subcutaneous injection group had lower levels of HbA1c. Practical Implications. In patients with type 2 diabetes, insulin treatment with the permanent subcutaneous injection method can better control the level of HbA1c than the multiple daily injection method.

Insulin pump treatment vs. multiple daily insulin injections in patients with poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a comparison of cardiovascular effects

AimsBoth hyperglycaemia and large glycaemic variability are associated with worse outcomes in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), possibly causing sympatho-vagal imbalance and endothelial dysfunction. Continuous subcutaneous insulin injection (CSII) improves glycemic control compared to multiple daily insulin injections (MDI). We aimed to assess whether CSII may improve cardiac autonomic and vascular dilation function compared to MDI.MethodsWe enrolled T2DM patients without cardiovascular disease with poor glycaemic control, despite optimized MDI therapy. Patients were randomized to continue MDI (with multiple daily peripheral glucose measurements) or CSII; insulin dose was adjusted to achieve optimal target ranges of blood glucose levels. Patients were studied at baseline and after 6 months by: 1) flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and nitrate-mediated dilation (NMD) of the brachial artery; 2) heart rate variability (HRV) by 24-hour ECG Holter monitoring (HM). 7-day continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) was performed in 9 and 8 patients of Group 1 and 2, respectively.ResultsOverall, 21 patients were enrolled, 12 randomized to CSII (Group 1) and 9 to MDI (Group 2). The daily dose of insulin and Hb1AC did not differ significantly between the 2 groups, both at baseline and at follow-up. Glucose variability showed some significant improvement at follow-up in the whole population, but no differences were observed between the 2 groups. Both FMD and NMD, as well as HRV parameters, showed no significant differences between the 2 groups at 6-month follow-up.ConclusionsIn this randomized small study we show that, in T2DM patients, CSII achieves a similar medium-term glycemic control compared to MDI, without any adverse effect on the cardiovascular system.

Advanced decision support system for individuals with diabetes on multiple daily injections therapy using reinforcement learning and nearest-neighbors: In-silico and clinical results

Many individuals with diabetes on multiple daily insulin injections therapy use carbohydrate ratios (CRs) and correction factors (CFs) to determine mealtime and correction insulin boluses. The CRs and CFs vary over time due to physiological changes in individuals' response to insulin. Errors in insulin dosing can lead to life-threatening abnormal glucose levels, increasing the risk of retinopathy, neuropathy, and nephropathy. Here, we present a novel learning algorithm that uses Q-learning to track optimal CRs and uses nearest-neighbors based Q-learning to track optimal CFs. The learning algorithm was compared with the run-to-run algorithm A and the run-to-run algorithm B, both proposed in the literature, over an 8-week period using a validated simulator with a realistic scenario created with suboptimal CRs and CFs values, carbohydrate counting errors, and random meals sizes at random ingestion times. From Week 1 to Week 8, the learning algorithm increased the percentage of time spent in target glucose range (4.0 to 10.0 mmol/L) from 51 % to 64 % compared to 61 % and 58 % with the run-to-run algorithm A and the run-to-run algorithm B, respectively. The learning algorithm decreased the percentage of time spent below 4.0 mmol/L from 9 % to 1.9 % compared to 3.4 % and 2.3 % with the run-to-run algorithm A and the run-to-run algorithm B, respectively. The algorithm was also assessed by comparing its recommendations with (i) the endocrinologist's recommendations on two type 1 diabetes individuals over a 16-week period and (ii) real-world individuals' therapy settings changes of 23 individuals (19 type 2 and 4 type 1) over an 8-week period using the commercial Bigfoot Unity Diabetes Management System. The full agreements (i) were 89 % and 76 % for CRs and CFs for the type 1 diabetes individuals and (ii) was 62 % for mealtime doses for the individuals on the commercial Bigfoot system. Therefore, the proposed algorithm has the potential to improve glucose control in individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.