Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods Research Articles

STATISTICAL INTEGRATION OF QGIS AND MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS FOR SUSTAINABLE RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN BELSAR DEVELOPMENT BLOCK

The definition of “rural areas” varies significantly across regions, making the determination of rurality levels crucial for sustainable development and effective policy design. This study introduces a comprehensive rurality index to rank and categorize villages within the Belsar Development Block of Gonda District, India. Utilizing Multiple-criteria Decision-making Methods (MCDMs) such as Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (F-AHP), Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Weighted Product Model (WPM), and Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE), we developed a robust methodology for this assessment. A thorough sensitivity analysis was also conducted to ensure the reliability of the results. The study identified fourteen critical factors, grouped into five domains: (1) socioeconomic status, (2) education, (3) land use, (4) employment, and (5) healthcare. Based on these factors, villages were ranked and classified into four categories according to their rurality levels, and a detailed rurality map was created with QGIS. The study revealed that the modified F-AHP emerged as the most effective MCDM method for this rurality assessment. Given the systematic execution of this assessment, it can serve as a model for comparative studies in other regions of India and globally, promoting sustainable rural development through informed decision-making.

A modified multiple-criteria decision-making approach based on a protein-protein interaction network to diagnose latent tuberculosis

BackgroundDNA microarrays provide informative data for transcriptional profiling and identifying gene expression signatures to help prevent progression of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) to active disease. However, constructing a prognostic model for distinguishing LTBI from active tuberculosis (ATB) is very challenging due to the noisy nature of data and lack of a generally stable analysis approach.MethodsIn the present study, we proposed an accurate predictive model with the help of data fusion at the decision level. In this regard, results of filter feature selection and wrapper feature selection techniques were combined with multiple-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods to select 10 genes from six microarray datasets that can be the most discriminative genes for diagnosing tuberculosis cases. As the main contribution of this study, the final ranking function was constructed by combining protein-protein interaction (PPI) network with an MCDM method (called Decision-making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory or DEMATEL) to improve the feature ranking approach.ResultsBy applying data fusion at the decision level on the 10 introduced genes in terms of fusion of classifiers of random forests (RF) and k-nearest neighbors (KNN) regarding Yager’s theory, the proposed algorithm reached a sensitivity of 0.97, specificity of 0.90, and accuracy of 0.95. Finally, with the help of cumulative clustering, the genes involved in the diagnosis of latent and activated tuberculosis have been introduced.ConclusionsThe combination of MCDM methods and PPI networks can significantly improve the diagnosis different states of tuberculosis.Clinical trial numberNot applicable.

Assessing the internationalization dynamics of emerging markets: a comprehensive analysis utilizing SWARA-WASPAS techniques

Purpose This paper aims to evaluate the internationalization of countries represented in the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The evaluation considers high-technology product imports, foreign direct investments, research and development expenditures, patent and industrial design applications, exports and gross domestic product (GDP) data, representing production. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses the Step-Wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) method to assess and rank the criteria for evaluating emerging markets. Four academics who are authorities in the field of foreign trade were consulted to weigh the criteria. The Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) method, considered one of the most reliable and robust MCDM techniques, was then used to evaluate and rank the countries. Findings The findings obtained during the research process reveal the internationalization dynamics of these countries based on the indicators they possess. As a result, it is observed which countries achieve higher performance in the internationalization process based on relevant criteria. Originality/value This study is theoretically unique and valuable as it simultaneously offers the potential for development to macro-level international trade theories, such as the technologic deficit hypothesis, and meso-level internationalization theories, such as the Uppsala model. Additionally, integrated multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods, which are not frequently used in cross-country studies, have been used, and the performance of emerging markets has been ranked. The findings obtained from this application distinguish the research from the existing literature by transforming it into a performance ranking rather than focusing on the antecedents or consequences of internationalization and their interactions.

Methodology of Multiple-Criteria Decision Making for Selecting a Refrigerant to Be Used in Commercial Refrigeration Equipment

This paper presents the application of the multiple-criteria decision-making (SAW) method for selecting the optimum refrigerant for the refrigeration systems of commercial cooling equipment used in gastronomy furniture, which is paramount in storing food under optimal conditions. The analysis focused on comparing different refrigerants, including natural refrigerants such as R744 (carbon dioxide) and R290 (propane) and synthetic refrigerants such as R455A, R449A, and R452A. As a result of the analysis using the SAW method, the refrigerant R455A was found to be the best solution. This choice resulted from the consideration of various decision criteria, such as energy efficiency, environmental impact, operating costs, and technology availability. R455A stands out as a synthetic refrigerant that provides high energy efficiency with minimal environmental impact. Its use supports sustainability goals by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and electricity consumption, which is crucial given the modern regulatory requirements and environmental standards. This study offers a practical decision-making tool for commercial refrigeration equipment designers and manufacturers, supporting them while selecting the optimal technological solutions. The choice of refrigerant R455A addresses the need to integrate energy efficiency, environmental protection, and cost-effectiveness in the process of designing modern refrigeration systems for catering furniture.

Interval pairwise comparisons in the presence of infeasibilities: Numerical experiments

Pairwise comparisons constitute a fundamental part of many multiple-criteria decision-making methods designed to solve complex real-world problems. One of the pervasive features associated with the complexity of any problem is uncertainty. Experts are rarely able to consistently and accurately evaluate a set of alternatives under consideration due to time pressure, cognitive bias, the intricacy or intangible essence of the problem, a lack of requisite knowledge or experience, or other reasons. Interval pairwise comparisons (IPCs) allow for this uncertainty in a natural way; however, the problem of inconsistency (or infeasibility) may arise. That is, a set of interval comparisons may not allow experts to find a solution in the form of a priority vector. The aim of this paper is to provide a comparison of existing priority deriving methods for inconsistent (infeasible) IPCs via numerical examples and simulations. Our results indicate that the Interval Stretching Method is the best with respect to preserving original preferences. In addition, the question of the uniqueness of the solution is investigated for selected methods, with the Fuzzy Preference Programming method being the best in providing a unique solution. Since the majority of examined methods provide mostly non-unique solutions, modifying these methods in order to provide unique solutions might be a research direction worth considering in the future.

An insightful multicriteria model for the selection of drilling technique for heat extraction from geothermal reservoirs using a fuzzy-rough approach

Geothermal energy stands out as an exceptional renewable resource for power generation, offering a consistent power production without the intermittency issues. Despite its potential to deliver a consistent supply of electricity on demand, geothermal adoption is hindered due to substantial costs. Utilising the most effective drilling method can alleviate this challenge by boosting efficiency and reducing operational costs. The primary goal of this study is to identify the best drilling method for extracting heat from geothermal reservoirs. This optimised approach facilitates better access to geothermal reservoirs, leading to increased heat recovery rates and improved project viability. Traditional methods often fall short in evaluating optimal drilling alternatives due to uncertainties. To address this, our research introduces an innovative paradigm that integrates novel T-Spherical Hesitant Fuzzy Rough (T−SHFR) set, method for the removal effects of criteria with a geometric mean and ranking alternatives with weights of criterion hybrid Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques. By leveraging the novel T−SHFR concept, our approach allows for a comprehensive assessment of various factors. This holistic evaluation ensures an exhaustive comprehension of the decision-making environment. The study reveals that reservoir characteristics play a significant role in selecting a sustainable drilling alternative. Furthermore, directional drilling appears as the most promising method with higher energy yields followed by slim hole drilling. The robustness and credibility of these findings are established through sensitivity and comparative analyses, indicating the potential applicability of this MCDM method to analogous challenges in different contexts. The findings of the ranking techniques were validated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, which revealed a positive and notable correlation. This research will empower stakeholders to make informed decisions, thereby enhancing the overall efficiency and sustainability of geothermal energy projects.

A novel decision support system for designing fixed shading systems in the early design stage: A case study in Egypt

Solar shading is a crucial element that can significantly impact lighting conditions and energy consumption, especially in hot regions. However, selecting the best shading design that achieves optimal daylight performance while meeting architects' requirements is very challenging. This is because it involves considering many design parameters and balancing multiple objectives. The paper introduces a decision support system for designing fixed shading systems to enhance interior environments and reduce energy consumption. Parametric simulation, a meta-model based on automatic selection of regression machine learning algorithms (RMLA), and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) are used to prepare the designs for selection. Three multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods are employed: the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), entropy, and the technique for order preference by similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS) in two combinations (AHP-TOPSIS and entropy-TOPSIS) to adapt to different expert availability scenarios. The proposed method is coded and automated with an easy-to-use interactive interface for flexibility and easy application. The method is applied to help design a fixed shading system for hot climate regions in Cairo, Egypt, which involves considering five objectives: useful day light illuminance (UDI), energy use intensity (EUI), solar gains (SG), daylight autonomy (DA), and continuous daylight autonomy (CDA). The proposed method can provide an efficient design that significantly improves daylight performance. Different dataset sizes are used for training the meta model to study their effect on the final selected design. A sensitivity analysis is done to explore the impact of changes in experts’ opinions on the decision-making process.

A Framework for Assessing Innovations, Business Models and Sustainability for Software Companies Using Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making

The management staff of software companies are constantly looking for ways to build market advantage and win business strategies. Introducing changes in companies is a costly process and carries the risk of poor allocation of resources. This article provides decision-makers with a tool that increases the chance of making the right business decisions and can also be a guide in the transformation of business models. The scientific aim of this article was to simultaneously cover three areas, innovation, business models, and sustainable development, to develop a scheme enabling the construction of rankings of the elements of these areas in a version dedicated to software producing companies. Rankings, which are built using the hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method, indicate to decision-makers the need for building strategic development plans, which aspects are the most important, and what the order of possible implementations should be. Based on a multi-criteria analysis, it was found that (i) in terms of innovation, companies should focus their attention first on implementing product, process, and technological innovations; (ii) within innovative business models, attempts should be made to produce IT systems using virtualization and dockerization, as well as efforts should be made to closely bind customers with the offered products and services and offer temporary rental of IT systems instead of classic licenses; and (iii) in the context of the classic three levels of sustainable development, companies should focus primarily on economic and financial issues.

Grey Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making

Decision Making (DM) is one of the most important components of human cognition. In particular, the Multiple-Criteria DM (MCDM), is a composite form of DM evaluating options with conflicting goals and choosing the best solution among the existing ones. Following the fuzzy DM criterion of Bellman and Zadeh in 1970, several other methods have been developed by other researchers for DM in fuzzy environments. Here we present a parametric, MCDM method utilizing grey numbers as tools. This method improves an earlier approach of Maji and colleagues in 2002, who used the tabular representation of a soft set as a tool for parametric MCDM in a fuzzy environment. The method is also extended to cover cases of weighted DM and suitable examples are presented illustrating our results.

Exploring sustainable watershed flood risks management: An innovative TFAHP-TOPSIS methodology in the Georges River Basin, Australia

Floods occur frequently in low-lying coastal and riverine areas, making it crucial to effectively identify the distribution of flood risks in flood-prone areas. Traditional risk assessment models based on Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method have limitations in both accuracy and effectiveness, particularly in identifying potential risks in watershed floodplains. To refine the flood measurement process, an optimized integrated MCDM model is proposed in this paper. Taking the Georges River Basin in Australia is chosen as an example, twelve risk indicators were identified, considering factors related to hazard, exposure, and vulnerability. To more accurately describe the characteristics of watershed floods, the flood hazard indicators were separated into sub-basins. The Triangular Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (TFAHP) is employed to optimize the weight calculation, and in combination with the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), the spatial distribution of flood risks was determined. The results indicate that high-risk areas are concentrated in the central-eastern part of Liverpool, the eastern part of Fairfield, and the central part of Bankstown-Canterbury. Medium to very-high potential risk areas identified by the integrated TFAHP-TOPSIS model are 17.3 % more than the single TFAHP method and 12.7 % more than the TOPSIS method, indicating that the integrated model performs better in identifying potential risks in floodplains. The results can provide decision support for disaster prevention strategies making in flood-prone areas.

The novel hybrid multiple criteria decision method BWM-Moora-N applied for investment funds prioritization

The novel hybrid multiple criteria decision method BWM-Moora-N applied for investment funds prioritization

Water Scarcity Zonation Mapping using MCDM Method in District, NAMCHI, South Sikkim using QGIS

Abstract: A major worldwide issue, water scarcity has especially serious repercussion like India that have an abundance of water. There are only so many fresh water sources available to meet the growing demand for water brought on by urbanisation, industrialisation, and population expansion, Since the limited water supplies cannot satisfy the population’s needs, a state of water scarcity has resulted. The present research is conducted in CCCT Chisopani, Sikkim, India. Water scarcity is a major issue in the area we selected, the multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) approach will be used in this case study to solve the ranking water scarcity problem, and the next upcoming major problem for water scarcity is the growing population in the study area. Along with the households the area consists of 2 study institutes due to which the population may increase in the coming years effecting the water management. The first step was to conduct a survey in and around the study area by preparing questionnaire including total population of household, highest qualification in the house, storage capacity, tenants, local source, rain water harvesting, hours water received, water fetched manually or not? Type of roofs, distance to perennial source. After collection, the data was evaluated and standardised to guarantee comparability across numerous criteria. Further the study was continued with water scarcity index calculation making it easier to prepare the zonation map for the study area. The MCDM method exhibits how the method can be used against the water scarcity problem. The main focus of the study was to create a scarcity map for the study zone in QGIS using RS&GIS method.

The preparation and selection process for a new form stable phase change material (FSPCM) intended for use as thermal storage in applications at intermediate temperatures

There is a greater focus on solar energy since the food processing business requires a lot of thermal energy to remove moisture from agricultural products. This study thoroughly explains how to choose Phase Change Materials (PCMs) within a specific temperature range. The best PCM is selected from the Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) procedures based on a few characteristics. Based on the results of the MCDM method, the eutectic of paraffin and palmitic acid is chosen. PCM is bound, and FSPCM is formed using clay. The method of preparation of Clay-based FSPCM is described in detail. The amount of clay materials and different clay percentage combinations are chosen from the leakage experiment. Kaolin has the least amount of leakage out of all the clay materials tested. Kaolin-based FSPCM Exhibits improvement in thermal conductivity compared to Pure PCM.

Z-number based fuzzy MCDM models for analyzing non-traditional security threats to finance supply chains: A case study from Vietnam

Non-traditional security (NTS) threats have a vast and profound impact on many aspects of economic, political, social, and many other areas, especially supply chain finance (SCF), particularly in countries like Vietnam, which potentially affects the economic efficiency of businesses' supply chain financial, thereby affecting the general economy of the country and the world. In order to prevent and minimize the negative impacts caused by NTS threats to SCF, this study was conducted to identify NTS threats affecting SCF in Vietnam, at the same time calculate the weight of the impact level and find out the cause and effect relationship between them. Solution strategies are also proposed and ranked, thereby serving as a reference basis for relevant parties to choose appropriate response solutions. Due to the multi-criteria nature of NTS threats, the multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) method is used in combination with the Z-number concept and Fuzzy set theory to approach the problem of certainty and increase the accuracy of study. The NTS threats are first identified through a literature review and then validated for suitability using the DELPHI technique (DELPHI). Suitable threats will be determined by relationship, weighted by Decision Making Trial And Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method. Proposed strategies are ranked using the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method. The results indicate that there are 19 NTS factors affecting SCF in Vietnam, and the global economic downturn, pandemic and health crisis, financial crisis and cybersecurity risk are the four root cause factors with the most decisive influence. Businesses and concerns need to prioritize addressing these four threats because they not only have a strong impact but also entail many other threats. The two strategies considered to be the most effective are a sustainable practice and a risk-hedging strategy. Businesses, governments, and stakeholders also should pay attention to the macroeconomic environment, technology, and environment and build sustainable businesses, regularly monitoring economic fluctuations and creating plans to prevent risks.

AI based fuzzy MCDM models: Comparison and evaluation of dissimilar outcomes, an application to enhance pilot recruitment process

AbstractPilot recruitment is critical as they pose a multifaceted challenge for civilian and military organizations due to the complex traits impacting their missions and performance. In this study, a novel set of criteria and sub‐criteria were determined to compare twelve candidate pilots. Numerically immeasurable, imprecise, and non‐linear continuous fuzzy linguistic traits (variables) were studied which make the work unique and challenging due to individual preferences and disagreements between decision‐makers (DMs). The outcomes of three distinct fuzzy multiple criteria decision‐making (MCDM) approaches; fuzzy TOPSIS, fuzzy VIKOR, and fuzzy PROMETHEE were evaluated with trapezoidal fuzzy numbers (TFNs) to sort the positions of candidate pilots. Moreover, a unique defuzzification ranking method was employed to adjust the results of fuzzy MCDM methods for the synthesis and evaluation of outcomes of the pilot selection problem. All these efforts make the paper original and outstanding. Our findings and analysis suggested that fuzzy TOPSIS and PROMETHEE methods' outcomes showed maximum close similarity for ranking positions. However, substantial distinctions were noted when comparing these outcomes with the fuzzy VIKOR approach. Yet, the mission of predicting and revealing the best candidates is related to several traits, their weights, and the methods selected. Therefore, since vague information and ambiguous preferences match fuzzy superiority, a comprehensive and unbiased evaluation was achieved, ensuring the integrity of the decision‐making process. The results can be employed to enhance the safety and efficiency of airline operations and ensure that the most qualified and competent pilots are selected for the job.

Evaluation of management practices in rice–wheat cropping system using multicriteria decision-making methods in conservation agriculture

In this study, we employed two multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods, namely the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and the Analytic Hierarchic Process (AHP), to determine the best management choice for the cultivation of wheat with a regime of conservation agriculture (CA) practices. By combining alternative tillage approaches, such as reduced tillage and zero tillage, with the quantity of crop residues and fertilizer application, we were able to develop the regime of CA practices. The performance of the regimes compared to the conventional ones was then evaluated using conflicting parameters relating to energy use, economics, agronomy, plant protection, and soil science. TOPSIS assigned a grade to each alternative based on how close it was to the ideal solution and how far away it was from the negative ideal solution. However, employing AHP, we determined the weights of each of the main and sub-parameters used for this study using pairwise comparison. With TOPSIS, we found ZERO1 (0% residue + 100% NPK) followed by ZERO4 (50%residue + 100% NPK), and ZERO2 (100% residue + 50% NPK) were the best performing tillage-based alternatives. To best optimize the performance of wheat crops under various CA regimes, TOPSIS assisted the decision-makers in distinguishing the effects of the parameters on the outcome and identifying the potential for maneuvering the weak links. The outcomes of this investigation could be used to improve management techniques for wheat production with CA practices for upscaling among the farmers.

Development of an Integrated Model for Open-Pit-Mine Discontinuous Haulage System Optimization

The selection of the optimal equipment for discontinuous haulage systems is one of the most important decisions that need to be made when an open-pit mine is designed. There are a number of influencing factors, including natural (geological and environmental), technical, economic, and social. Some of them can be expressed numerically, in certain units of measure, while others are descriptive and can be stated by linguistic variables depending on the circumstances of the project. These factors are characterized by a high level of uncertainty, associated with both exploration and mining operations. The experience, knowledge, and expert judgment of engineers and specialists are of key importance for the management of mining processes, consistent with the issues stemming from the dynamic expansion of open-pit mines in space over time. This paper proposes an integrated model that translates all the criteria that affect the selection of the optimal solution into linguistic variables. By employing the multiple-criteria decision-making method and combining it with fuzzy logic, we developed an algorithm that addresses all the above-mentioned uncertainties inherent in various mining processes where the experience of experts forms the basis. The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process is used in order to deal with trending decision problems, such as mining equipment and management system selection. The entire algorithm was applied to a real case study—the Ugljevik East 1 open-pit mine.

Ranking Performance of MARCOS Method for Location Selection Problem in the Presence of Conflicting Criteria

The selection of the best location for a facility is generally a complex process especially when considering multiple criteria in the selection process. The costs associated with purchasing the land and related constructions makes the location selection problem a long-term investment decision. Hence, the problem should be analysed carefully with a reliable approach to avoid the consequences that follows awkward decisions. Many multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods are developed recently which made the selection of a suitable MCDM method has become a confusing decision. In this study, measurement alternatives and ranking according to compromise solution (MARCOS) method is used to solve a location selection problem with conflicting criteria. The ranking produced by MARCOS method is analysed by a comparison with other common MCDM methods and a sensitivity analysis. The aim of the comparison to show that the method agreed the choice of the best alternative while the sensitivity analysis is employed to check the robustness and efficiency of this method. The sensitivity analysis includes the sensitivity of weight test and rank reversal (RR) test. The comparison of ranking with different methods showed that MARCOS method has strong ranking correlation with other methods. Moreover, the sensitivity analysis showed the reliability and robustness of MARCOS method as it produced high consistency of ranking through the tests. Thus, this study validates the applicability of MARCOS method to handle the presence of conflicting criteria in location selection problems.

Extreme analysis of typhoons disaster in mainland China with insurance management

Due to climate change, typhoons, especially extreme typhoons, are becoming more intense and causing ascending financial losses. A majority of previous studies on typhoon economic losses over a period of time considered all types of typhoon rather than the extreme typhoons. This study focuses on the risk management of extreme typhoons by establishing the compensation mechanism and a typhoon-specific insurance product. The annual maximum losses of typhoons is first modelled by generalized extreme value distribution (GEV) under the Extreme Value Theory (EVT). The prediction of unexpected economic losses is then obtained via VaR and CVaR for the compensation mechanism among individual, insurance company and government. To analyse the typhoon vulnerability of 11 Chinese coastal provinces (or municipalities), the Multiple-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method, combining Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) based Grey Rational Analysis (GRA) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), is applied for evaluating the typhoon vulnerability of these regions for 2022. The nationwide best estimates for typhoon reserves on the basis of insurance compensation mechanism is therefore calculated and will be allocated to these 11 provinces according to the vulnerability ranking obtained via MCDM method. The findings indicate that the top three provinces (Guangdong, Fujian and Zhejiang) in typhoon vulnerability rankings are also with the highest losses and frequency in practice, while Hebei has the highest insurance premium.

Storm surge risk assessment and sensitivity analysis based on multiple criteria decision-making methods: a case study of Huizhou City

Coastal areas face escalating storm surge disasters due to rising sea levels and urban growth, posing greater risks to lives and property. Comprehensive storm surge risk assessment and sensitivity analysis in coastal areas are crucial for effective disaster prevention and mitigation. This research focuses on Huizhou, China, conducting a comparative study of storm surge risk assessment and sensitivity analysis based on an integrated approach, which includes the storm surge inundation numerical model (FVCOM-SWAN), Geographic Information System (GIS) and Remote Sensing (RS) techniques, and Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods. Ten flood-related risk indicators are selected from the hazard, exposure and vulnerability, the weights of which are evaluated through a comprehensive comparison among Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP), Entropy Weight (EW), AHP-EW, and FAHP-EW methods. High-precision risk level maps are generated subsequently utilizing GIS and RS techniques. Sensitivities of the indicators are analyzed using One-At-A-Time (OAT) and Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (FAST) methods. The proposed storm surge risk assessment framework, the MCDM comparative study and the sensitivity analysis can offer insights for better understanding and management of storm surge risks, and contribute to the standardization and application of storm surge risk assessment.