Multiplanar External Fixation Research Articles

The Clinical Application of Double Taylor Spatial Frame in Segmental Tibial Fracture.

Multi-planar external fixation has been used for the management of segmental tibial fractures with severe soft tissue injuries. However, fewer specialized studies have been reported. The primary aim of this study was to describe our experience of treating fractures of this type using the Taylor Spatial Frame and Ilizarov external fixation methods. We retrospectively analyzed 33 patients with segmental tibial fracture treated at our institution between January 2016 and December 2020. The patients were divided into double Taylor Spatial Frame (D-TSF) and Ilizarov groups based on the external fixation structure. Baseline demographic data included sex, age, injury side and cause, open or closed fracture, time from injury to surgery, complications, and external frame removal and fracture healing time. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) was measured from preoperative, immediate postoperative, and final follow-up full-length X-rays of bilateral lower limbs. We determined the degree of deviation in the HKA by calculating the difference between the measured angle and the ideal value of 180°; the absolute value was used to assess recovery of the lower limb force line. At the final follow-up, Johner-Wruhs tibial fracture outcome criteria (J-W TFOC) were used to classify the postoperative function of the affected limb as excellent, good, moderate, or poor. Count data were analyzed with the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test; the Mann-Whitney U test was used for rank data. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of sex, age, side of injury, cause of injury, closed or open fracture, or time between injury and surgery, which indicates that the groups were comparable (p > 0.05). A statistically significant difference was observed in external frame removal and fracture healing time between the D-TSF and Ilizarov groups (36.24 ± 8.34 vs 45.42 ± 10.21 weeks, p = 0.009; 33.33 ± 8.21 vs 42.00 ± 9.78 weeks, p = 0.011). The Johner-Wruhs criteria were used to assess the function of the affected limb, the D-TSF group performed better in correcting the lower limb force line than the Ilizarov group. A statistically significant difference in terms of excellent ratings was observed between the two groups (18/2/1/0 vs 5/5/1/1, p = 0.010). Postoperative follow-up X-rays demonstrated a significant improvement in the HKA in both groups immediately after surgery and at the final follow-up compared to the angle before surgery. At the final follow-up, a statistically significant difference was observed in the degree of deviation in the HKA between the two groups (1.58° ± 0.84° vs 2.37° ± 1.00°, p = 0.023). The D-TSF treatment is associated with minimal secondary damage to soft tissue, a straightforward and minimally invasive procedure, multiplanar stable fracture fixation, and optimization of fracture alignment and lower limb force lines, therefore, it is highly effective therapeutic option for segmental tibial fracture.

Evaluation and Management of Pediatric Humeral Shaft Fractures.

Diaphyseal humerus fractures in the pediatric population have dynamic treatment strategies that depend on injury pattern, mechanism, patient skeletal maturity, and size. Treatment strategies include closed reduction with various immobilization techniques, flexible nails, uniplanar or multiplanar external fixation, or plate osteosynthesis. Accepted parameters for sagittal and coronal alignment vary based on age and potential for remodeling, and the multiplanar motion of the shoulder joint can accommodate for greater variations in alignment than many other long bone fractures. Complications such as radial nerve palsy are possible with both open and closed injuries, and mal/nonunions, although rare, can occur. Overall, treatment should be predicated on a full evaluation of the patient, fracture, local soft tissues, and any concomitant injuries.

Combined limited internal fixation and multiplanar external fixation for immediate weight bearing of fractures around the foot and ankle.

Treatment of fractures around the foot and ankle can be challenging in patients who are unable to remain non weight bearing on their lower extremity. Traditional implants are not sufficient to resist loads incurred during weight bearing and can also lead to complications related to wound healing and infection. We describe a technique for fracture fixation of the foot and ankle that uses low profile implants to minimize soft tissue insult combined with multiplanar external fixation to allow for immediate weight bearing.

Accuracy of Tibia Deformity Correction with a Hexapod Multiplanar External Fixator with Measurements Taken from Radiographs, CT Scan, and Imaging Software: A Cadaveric Study

Category:Other; TraumaIntroduction/Purpose:The success of hexapod multiplanar external fixators for correction of tibial deformity has been well described. The ability to correct deformity is based on the accuracy of the reference and deformity data inputted into the prescription program. If the data is not accurate, multiple residual programs may be required for final correction. There are limited papers evaluating i accuracy of intraoperative measurements. We are unaware of any analysis on the use of CT scan to determine deformity and reference points. Newer software program allows surgeons to incorporate radiographs into the correction program to determine deformity and reference points. Our study objective was to compare deformity and reference point measurements taken from radiographs, CT, and imaging software to determine which method most accurately corrects tibia deformities.Methods:Hexapod external fixators were orthogonally applied on four full length tibia cadavers. Strut lengths were set to the same length. Each cadaver was assigned a different deformity: proximal quartile, distal quartile, midshaft, and segmental. An osteotomy was performed and the hexapod struts were loosened to create a multiplanar deformity. Radiographs and CT were taken orthogonal to the reference ring. Deformity and reference points were measured off each according to correction software data points. Pictures of the radiographs were imported into the software program (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) and the correction reference points were determined with imaging software. All cadavers had a correction program for each method. Two surgeons performed the measurements twice to determine inter and intra-observer accuracy. Corrections were performed and post reduction radiographs were measured to determine length, angulation and translation. In addition, the total number of millimeters each strut was off from the pre-deformity position was recorded.Results:Line technique on software program was significantly better at measuring segmental deformity and the Image technique was statistically more accurate to correct proximal, midshaft and distal deformities (p<0.05). Overall, all methods were more accurate correcting Midshaft and Proximal deformities (44.8mm and 50.4mm, respectively) significantly better than Distal and Segmental deformity correction (88.9mm and 121.7mm, respectively (p<0.001). There was no difference in absolute measurements or intra-observer error between the four surgeons (p>0.05).Conclusion:Compared to the traditional method of measuring deformity and frame reference using radiographs, new imaging software appears to be superior and more reproducible in correcting tibia deformities. Surgeons should recognize the increased difficulty in correcting segmental and distal deformities regardless of the method used. Accuracy of determining deformity and frame reference points has the potential to decrease time patients are in a frame and reduces the potential for malunions. Further investigation is needed to determine sites of variation to further improve the process of correcting complex deformities of the tibia.

Augmentation of Internal Fixation With Multiplanar External Fixator in High Risk Hind Foot Fusion Patients

Category:Hindfoot; Ankle; DiabetesIntroduction/Purpose:Achieving adequate fixation is a critical component for successful fusion. Internal fixation can be compromised in the setting of poor bone quality due to open trauma, infection, osteoporosis, neuropathic arthropathy resulting in published ankle non-union rates of 38% in high risk patients. These failures may be magnified by weightbearing non-compliance.While the use of multiplanar external fixation (MEF) alone can be utilized - it can often require an extended period of time within the frame (mean 18 weeks, range 9-28 weeks) and complications such as pin site infections. We hypothesized that hybrid fixation, MEF in conjunction with internal fixation, will provide adequate stability elevating the fusion rates in complex fusion cases while allowing early weight bearing and reduces the MEF time and infection rate.Methods:Eleven patients were identified that demonstrate significant risk factors for a successful fusion (infection, charcot, neuropathy, smoking, history of non-union) that were treated with internal fixation augmented with MEF. Patients with an active infection underwent surgical irrigation and debridement, placement of an antibiotic spacer and a course of intravenous antibiotics six weeks prior to placement of internal fixation. In these cases, MEF was placed at the time of surgical irrigation and debridement to allow for stability. In those patient’s without an active fixation, both the internal fixation and MEF were placed at the same time. Internal fixation construct was based on surgeon preference. Patients were allowed to transfer weight bear at the time of surgery and could advance as tolerated after 2 weeks. CT was utilized to assess fusion. Outcomes measured were fusion rate and occurrence of internal fixation infection.Results:The mean age of patients was 55 (range 26-75), eight patients had diabetes, three were current smokers, two were former smokers, two patients had open trauma, one patient had peripheral neuropathy and one patient had a history of a non- union with known non-compliance. Six patients had an active infection and underwent irrigation and debridement, placement of antibiotic spacer and MEF during antibiotic treatment. Seven patients underwent intramedullary nail fixation, three patients underwent plate and screw constructs and one patient underwent screw only fixation. CT demonstrated fusion in all patients (100%). The mean time for external fixation was 72 days (range 41-111). There were no cases of infected internal fixation.Conclusion:The findings of the current study suggest high rates of hind foot fusion with the use of internal fixation augmented with MEF in a complex patient group with identified high non-union risk factors. Using internal fixation, patients time in the frame is much reduced than published studies evaluating MEF alone for fusion fixation. MEF did not result in any cases of infected internal fixation. Patients with hybrid fixation also benefit from early weight bearing. We emphasize the importance of good surgical technique and infection management using this technique.

Complication Rates in Ankle and Hindfoot Charcot Arthropathy Treated with Arthrodesis

Category:Diabetes; Ankle; Hindfoot; OtherIntroduction/Purpose:Charcot arthropathy of the ankle and hindfoot is a progressive and destructive process that can lead to instability and ulceration resulting in significant morbidity. When indicated, the surgical goals are to restore a stable plantigrade foot, reduce the risk of ulceration, and improve function to independent ambulation. Techniques for reconstruction of the neuropathic ankle/hindfoot include external and/or internal fixation. Current literature involving small series of surgical patients has shown a high rate of limb salvage and low complication rate. Our experience has been less promising, although we believe it remains a viable option. It is our goal to report the outcomes of Charcot patients undergoing corrective ankle and hindfoot reconstruction.Methods:We retrospectively reviewed 377 patients undergoing hindfoot and ankle arthrodesis at our institution from 2006- 2017. 77 patients were identified that underwent arthrodesis for Charcot arthropathy, 51 of which met inclusion and exclusion criteria with a minimum one year follow up. 42 had internal fixation as their primary procedure (plate or nail) and 9 patients underwent external fixation with a multi-planar external fixator. Median follow up time was 4 years (IQR 2.97 years).Preoperatively, basic demographic variables, etiology of neuropathy, ulcer status, radiographic measurements, Brodsky classification, and presence of a viable talus were collected and analyzed. Postoperatively, we collected complications including infection, hardware failure, ulceration, recurrent deformity, and nonunion. Reoperation numbers and indications for reoperation were also collected. The primary outcome measure was limb salvage at final follow up. Secondary outcome measures were ambulatory and footwear/bracing status.Results:11 patients (20%) underwent amputation at final follow up and 26 (47.3%) achieved radiographic union, both of which did not vary by fixation type (p=0.67 and p=0.88). The primary reasons for amputation were persistent infection and non-union. 74.5% of patients developed a post-operative complication and 58.2% had at least one reoperation. 25.5% of patients developed a post- operative infection. Patients with a pre-operative ulceration were more likely to undergo external fixation (p=0.02), but amputation rates did not differ between groups (p>0.99). There was a trend toward increased risk of post-operative infection in the ulceration group (p=0.07). A pre-operative Meary’s angle >25° was more likely to undergo amputation (p=0.04) and less likely to achieve radiographic union (p=0.05). 75.9% of patients were ambulatory at final follow up.Conclusion:Our rates of amputation (20%), post-operative infection (25%), complications (74.5%) and non-union (52%) are higher than previously described. Previous literature has described a near 100% limb salvage rate, but in our report on a large series of Charcot patients undergoing hindfoot/ankle arthrodesis we describe an 80% limb salvage rate. Pre-operative Meary’s angle >25° was predictive of treatment failure.

Management of Pediatric Tibial Shaft Fractures

Diaphyseal tibia fractures in the pediatric population have dynamic treatment strategies that depend on injury pattern, mechanism, patient skeletal maturity and size. Treatment strategies include closed reduction and cast immobilization, flexible nails, uniplanar or multiplanar external fixation or plate osteosynthesis. Accepted parameters for sagittal and coronal alignment vary based on age and potential for remodeling, although all fractures should have minimal rotational malalignment and less than 1 cm of shortening. Stable union generally occurs in 3 to 4 weeks for the common toddler's fracture and 6 to 8 weeks in other fracture patterns. Complications such as compartment syndrome are possible with both open and closed injuries, and nonunions, although rare, are more common in patients treated with external fixation or flexible nailing. Overall, treatment should be predicated on a full evaluation of the patient, fracture, local soft tissues, and any concomitant injuries.

Outcomes of Hindfoot and Ankle Arthrodesis in Neuropathic Patients

Category:Ankle Arthritis, Diabetes, HindfootIntroduction/Purpose:Charcot neuropathy of the ankle and hindfoot is a progressive and destructive process that can lead to instability and ulceration resulting in significant morbidity which can end with amputation. The foot and ankle surgeon’s aim is to reconstruct the high risk foot with the creation of a stable plantigrade foot, while reducing the risk of ulceration and allowing the patient to mobilize in commercially available footwear. There are numerous techniques for the reconstruction of the neuropathic hindfoot, but the most utilized of these include multiplanar external fixation or internal fixation with a plate or intramedullary nail. It is our goal to further elucidate outcomes of Charcot patients undergoing corrective ankle and hindfoot fusion comparing internal versus external fixation.Methods:We retrospectively collected 377 patients undergoing hindfoot and ankle arthrodesis at our institution from 2006- 2017. 77 patients were identified that underwent arthrodesis for Charcot arthropathy, 56 of which met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. This included 47 who had internal fixation as their primary procedure and 9 patients who underwent external fixation with a multi-planar external fixator. Our median follow up time was 3.4 years (IQR .5 to 12.9). Preoperatively we collected basic demographic variables, reasons for neuropathy, and ulcer status. Postoperatively we collected complications including infection, hardware failure, ulceration, recurrent deformity, and radiographic outcomes including union and hardware backout. Reoperation numbers and indications were also collected. Our primary outcome was limb salvage at final follow up.Secondarily, we collected final ambulatory and footwear status.Results:The limb salvage rate was 82% with 10 patients undergoing amputation, which did not vary between groups (p=.99). The primary reasons for amputation were persistent infection (4 of 10) and nonunion (4 of 10). Thirteen (24%) patients developed an infection. The median number of reoperations per patient was 1 (IQR 0-2) with the patients who underwent amputation undergoing a median of 2 (IQR 2-4) reoperations. The rate of union was 54%, occurring at a median of 26.5 (IQR 12-47) months. 44% (4/9) of patients in the external fixation group had a preoperative ulceration versus 19% (9/47) of the patients in the internal fixation group (p=.19). Preoperative ulceration was not a risk factor for amputation. Forty-two (75%) patients were ambulatory at final follow up.Conclusion:We report on the single largest series of Charcot patients undergoing hindfoot and ankle arthrodesis. The surgical management of this population has a high rate of complications with infection and reoperation being common. Despite a high nonunion rate most patients are able to ambulate in a brace or orthotic. Limb salvage can be expected with either internal or external fixation techniques.

Masquelet Technique for Hindfoot Fusion of Gustilo IIIA Open Ankle Dislocation with Complete Talar Extrusion and Loss

Category:Hindfoot, Trauma, AnkleIntroduction/Purpose:Complete talar extrusion is a rare injury resulting from high-energy trauma, with dissociation of the talus from surrounding bony and soft-tissue structures. Complications after complete talar extrusion include infection, osteonecrosis, posttraumatic osteoarthritis, and leg-length discrepancy. There is a lack of consensus on the optimal treatment algorithm for complete talar extrusion, due in part to high complication rates associated with injury and treatment. Thus, we report a staged treatment method utilizing the Masquelet Technique with temporary cement spacer, followed by bone grafting with use of femoral shaft autograft and bulk cancellous allograft.Methods:44-year-old male status post high-speed motorcycle collision presented with left ankle Gustilo IIIC open fracture dislocation with complete talar extrusion and loss, concomitant ipsilateral tibial plateau fracture and metatarsal shaft fractures. Twelve weeks post-injury, after multiple staged debridements, external fixation and extensive wound vac treatments, removal of the left leg multi-planar external fixator was performed with left distal tibial, fibular, navicular and calcaneal articular and subchondral bone debridement in preparation for Masquelet procedure and pantalar fusion. Open reduction and realignment of left ankle and foot with intramedullary fixation with hindfoot fusion nail was performed, with placement of antibiotic cement spacer for development of secondary reactive periosteal membrane. After nine weeks, intramedullary bone reaming aspiration tool was utilized for removal of left femur intramedullary bone marrow for autograft. Hindfoot pantalar fusion was performed using ipsilateral femoral shaft autograft and bulk cancellous allograft in place of antibiotic spacer.Results:Patient went on successfully to fusion and had one transfixation screw removed during the course of his recovery. Patient was also treated using a long leg ankle foot orthosis brace as a stress shielding device during heavy labor. Patient returned back to work and heavy labor as a landscaper and has had no residual pain. At 24 months postoperative, patient achieved an AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score of 83/100 (good).Conclusion:To our knowledge, this is the first case of complete talar extrusion treated with a Masquelet procedure with ipsilateral femoral shaft autograft and bulk cancellous allograft. While chronic pain is reported in as many as 75% of patients post- complete talar extrusion, and infection rates as high as 88%, our patient reports no residual pain and did not experience a postoperative infection. This technique represents a reasonable approach and warrants consideration for the treatment of this rare, complex injury.

Using TSF Multi-Planar External Fixation for Overcorrection of Severe Equinus Contractures of the Ankle joint

Category:Ankle, Hindfoot, TraumaIntroduction/Purpose:Equinus deformity is a debilitating condition which interferes with the activity of daily living. Correction of the deformity ranges from conservative (heel cord stretching, orthotics) to surgical treatment (Baumann, Strayer, Achilles lengthening, soft tissue releases). Severe contractures need surgical intervention with extensive dissections to release soft tissues. This study investigated the clinical outcomes of gradual equinus contracture overcorrection using a Taylor Spatial Frame with tendo-Achilles lengthening or toe flexor tenotomy as necessary.Methods:This retrospective chart review evaluated patients with significant equinus treated with a Taylor Spatial Frame at a single large tertiary referral center. Data collected included: diagnosis; patient demographics; laterality; time in frame; additional procedures; complications. Patients were assessed preoperatively and were followed at one-week, three-week, six-week, three- month, and six-month intervals, and yearly after.Results:24 patients (26 procedures) were treated with a Taylor Spatial Frame for equinus and had complete preoperative and eighteen-month follow-up measurements. The angle of deformity increased from a preoperative -21.5 (range, -69.0 to -1.0) degrees to a postoperative 4.9 (range, -17.0 to 17.0) degrees (z = -4.4573, p = 0.0001, N = 26, Wilcoxon signed rank test). Four complications occurred during the follow up (two pin site infections, one broken pin, and one plantar abscess). Three patients had recurrence of of equinus deformity at time of last follow-up.Conclusion:Taylor Spatial Frame is a successful method for correcting severe, fixed equinus contractures of the ankle joint with minimal soft tissue related complications. Over correction should be achieved in order to compensate for the loss of some dorsiflexion after frame removal.

A technique for hip arthrodesis using a multiplanar external fixator and transarticular screws

Background: To determine the clinical and radiographic results of hip arthrodesis using external with minimal internal fixation. Methods: A consecutive series of ten patients underwent hip arthrodesis using combined multi planar external fixation and transarticular screws. Operative parameters and radiographic and clinical results were retrospectively analyzed for each patient. Results: Mean estimated blood loss was 490 mL. At an average follow-up of 47.5 months, Harris Hip Score averaged 83.4. Mean postoperative measurements included anatomic axis hip adduction of 9°, hip flexion 22.2°, and leg length discrepancy 20.3 mm. Average adduction drift of 8.3° was noted after fixator removal. There were no nonunions. Conclusion: The described technique for hip arthrodesis reliably fused the hip in a favorable position requiring a less invasive approach with lower blood loss. Additional advantages include multiplanar stability, potential for hip position adjustment postoperatively and preservation of hip abductors; in case of future hip replacement.Level of Evidence: This was a Level IV, case series.

Bone grafting via reamer-irrigator-aspirator for nonunion of open Gustilo-Anderson type III tibial fractures treated with multiplanar external fixator.

Introduction: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the outcomes following reamer-irrigator-aspirator (RIA) autogenous bone grafting (ABG) of high-grade open tibia fracture nonunions stabilized via multiplanar external fixation. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with Gustilo-Anderson type III open tibia fractures treated with multiplanar external fixation and who underwent RIA ABG for nonunion at our institutional Level 1 Trauma Center between 2008 and 2015. All patients between 15 and 65 years of age with a minimum of six-month follow-up were included. The primary outcomes of interest were achievement of union, time to union, and incidence of revision surgery. Complications and all-cause reoperation were recorded as secondary endpoints. Results: Fifteen patients met the inclusion criteria with a mean age of 41.1 ± 14.0 years. RIA ABG was harvested from the femur in all cases, with a mean volume of 34 ± 15 mL. At an average follow-up of 13.3 ± 6.8 months, all patients achieved union, including two who required repeat RIA ABG. One patient experienced a femoral shaft fracture four months following RIA that required intramedullary fixation. The average time to union was 6.0 ± 6.3 months. Twelve patients (80%) went on to union within six months and 13 (86.7%) within one year. Five patients experienced a total of six post-operative complications including three deep infections, one refracture through the nonunion site, and one gradual varus deformity. Two patients in this series required a subsequent RIA autografting procedure secondary to persistent nonunion despite initial RIA. Conclusion: We found that RIA ABG offered a reliable solution to nonunion of Gustilo-Anderson type III open tibial fractures treated with multiplanar external fixation, circumventing the need to change the method of fixation.

A unique multi-planar external fixator developed for hip distraction

A unique multi-planar external fixator developed for hip distraction

Addressing Hindfoot Arthritis with Concomitant Tibial Malunion or Nonunion with Retrograde Tibiotalocalcaneal Nailing

Tibial malunions and nonunions are associated with degenerative changes about the ankle. A comprehensive literature review revealed no articles discussing treatment options for patients with tibial shaft malunion and ipsilateral ankle arthritis. The aim of our study was to evaluate a series of patients in whom tibial osteotomy and retrograde tibiotalocalcaneal nailing were used to treat both tibial deformity and ankle osteoarthritis. Twenty-five patients underwent retrograde tibiotalocalcaneal nailing with concomitant realignment tibial osteotomy with takedown of the nonunion or malunion in a single procedure. All surgical procedures were performed by a single surgeon at a single institution. Baseline patient characteristics (age, sex, body mass index [BMI], preoperative diagnosis, and prior surgical procedures) were recorded. Data including visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores (0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating worst pain) and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot (AOFAS-AH) scores were prospectively collected at the preoperative evaluation and the time of final follow-up, and patients were asked about their final satisfaction. Preoperative VAS scores averaged 8.3 (range, 7 to 10) of 10, which improved to an average of 2.8 (range, 0 to 6) at the time of final follow-up (p < 0.01). The preoperative AOFAS-AH scores averaged 43 (range, 18 to 62) of 100 and improved to 76 (range, 57 to 84) at the time of follow-up (p = 0.022). Twenty-one patients (84%) stated that they were extremely satisfied with the result of the procedure, three patients (12%) were satisfied, and one patient (4%) with a poor result was unsatisfied. Tibial malunion or nonunion with concomitant hindfoot arthritis can be addressed with a single-stage procedure consisting of tibial osteotomy and retrograde intramedullary nailing for correction of the angular deformity and hindfoot fusion. This procedure provides a viable alternative to multiplanar external fixation or a staged procedure addressing the nonunion or angular deformity and the hindfoot arthritis separately.

Taylor Spatial Frame in the Treatment of Upper Extremity Conditions

Taylor spatial frame (TSF) is a modern multiplanar external fixator that combines ease of application and computer accuracy; it provides the capability of 1 to 6 axes of deformity correction sequentially or simultaneously by adjusting 6 connecting struts between 2 circular rings. Previous reports have documented the effectiveness of the TSF in acute fracture care, nonunion treatment, and in bone lengthening and deformity correction in the lower extremity. To the authors' knowledge, no previous case series in the English literature have documented the use of the TSF in treating upper extremity conditions. Our experience with the use of this external fixator in the treatment of upper extremity length abnormality, angulation, and bone transport is summarized. Over a period of 7 years, TSF was used in 12 patients with varying upper extremity pathologies that were collected from our prospective external fixator database. The classic TSF planning strategy was adopted and the TSF web-based program was used. All cases were followed for a minimum of 2 years. The database and radiographs were reviewed to obtain demographic data, malalignment parameters, final correction, time in the TSF, and complications. Patients' ages ranged from 8 to 18 years. Eight humeral and 4 radial cases were identified. These included 4 cubitus varus and 1 cubitus valgus deformity, 1 neglected supracondylar fracture, 2 humeral nonunion, 2 radial malunion cases, and 1 radial shaft septic nonunion. Time in the TSF varied according to patient age and bone involved. Five patients had superficial pin site infections that resolved with oral antibiotics. Postoperatively mean final angulation on the anteroposterior radiograph was 1 degree (range, 0 to 5 degrees) and the mean final angulation on the lateral radiograph was 0.5 degrees (range, 0 to 2 degrees). Union of bone was achieved in all cases. The TSF is an external fixator that can be successfully used as a treatment alternative for the definitive treatment of upper extremity conditions involving a deformity and or shortening or bone transport in the pediatric and adolescent patient population. Level IV.

Dynamic vs static external fixation of distal radial fractures: A randomized study

Objectives:The present randomized study is conducted to compare the functional and anatomical outcomes of dynamic multiplanar external fixation against that of static external fixation in the management of displaced unstable comminuted fractures of the distal radius.Materials and Methods:Sixty adult patients with displaced unstable comminuted fractures of the distal radius were randomly allocated either to the dynamic (n=30) or static (n=30) fixator groups. Patients in the dynamic fixator group were managed with closed reduction and application of Penning-type articulated fixator (Orthofix, Srl, Italy); the injured wrist was partially dynamized at 3 weeks. Patients in the static group were managed with monoplanar static external fixator of Joshi's external stabilizing system (JESS) type fixator. In both groups, the fixator was maintained for 6–8 weeks. The patients were followed-up over 2 years. The primary outcome measures were the functional outcome as measured using the Gartland and Werley and DASH scores and anatomical outcome as measured using the Lindstrom score. The secondary objective was to correlate anatomical and functional outcomes and to look at overall local complications.Results:Palmar tilt was better restored in the Penning fixator group (P<0.0001). There was reduced loss of ulnar tilt (P=0.05) and radial height (P=0.04) in the Penning fixator group. Gartland and Werley score was better in the Penning fixator group at each time point of the follow-up. The DASH score was similar in the two groups at 2 years (P=0.14). There was poor correlation (0.19) between functional outcome and anatomical restoration at 2 years.Conclusions:In the management of displaced unstable comminuted fracture of the distal radius, use of an articulated multiplanar external fixator, allowing partial dynamization of the injured wrist at 3 weeks, resulted in improved early functional and anatomical outcome as compared to static external fixation. However, there was no significant difference in functional outcome at 2 years.

Correction of Rigid Equinovarus Deformity Using a Multiplanar External Fixator

The rigid equinovarus foot deformity is a challenging condition treated by the orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeon. Rapid surgical correction of the deformity may lead to skin and neurologic complications. Gradual correction of the deformity with a multiplanar external fixator may decrease these complications. The purpose of this study was to present the results of a group of patients with rigid equinovarus deformities corrected using a multiplanar external fixator. We retrospectively reviewed the results of correction of a rigid equinovarus deformity using multiplanar external fixation in a small group of patients. All patients underwent open Achilles lengthening, posterior capsule release, tibialis posterior tendon lengthening, flexor digitorum longus and flexor hallux longus lengthening, followed by application of a multiplanar external fixator with gradual correction of the deformity over a period of several weeks. Preoperative and postoperative deformity and AOFAS ankle-hindfoot scores were assessed. A total of eight rigid equinovarus deformities in six patients were treated with a multiplanar external fixator. The average patient age at the time of surgery was 37.2 (range, 17 to 59 ± 15.0) years. Causes of the deformity included trauma in three patients, traumatic brain injury in two patients, and long-standing rheumatoid arthritis in one patient. The average preoperative AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score was 28.3 (range, 12 to 38 ± 7.7). The average postoperative AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score was 68.1 (range 38 to 86 ± 15.5) at an average followup of 71.9 (30 to 120 ± 36.2) weeks. All deformities were gradually corrected to a plantigrade foot using a multiplanar external fixator over an average time of 5 (range, 4 to 6 ± 0.8) weeks. After correction of the deformity, the external fixator was left in place for a time period equal to or twice the length of time it took to achieve correction. The average duration of external fixation was 10.8 (range, 8 to 16 ± 2.8) weeks. Seven of eight deformities maintained correction at final followup. There was one case of recurrence. Correction of a rigid equinovarus deformity using a multiplanar external fixator was a viable treatment option. It allowed for correction of the deformity in a controlled manner, helping to reduce the risk of neurovascular complications that may result from single stage surgical correction. The risk of wound complications still exists with the correction of such a complex deformity.

Taylor spatial frame in the treatment of neglected fractures

The Taylor spatial frame (TSF, Smith and Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA) is a modern multiplanar external fixator that combines ease of application and computer accuracy. Many patients in our geographic area seek treatment for their fractures by traditional bonesetters and present in the middle of treatment with neglected malaligned fractures. These fractures were an average of 10weeks old (range 6-14weeks) fractures with callus that were allowed to heal in a poor position. The spatial frame is applied easily on the fracture bone fragments. The accuracy of fracture reduction and deformity correction is dependant on analyzing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the fracture. Our experience with this external fixator in the treatment of neglected fractures is summarized. Over a period of 6years, the TSF was used in 24 neglected fracture cases which were collected from our prospective external fixator data base. All cases were followed for a minimum of 3years. The data base and radiographs were reviewed in order to obtain demographic data, malalignment parameters, final correction, time in the TSF, and complications. The patients' ages ranged from 6 to 18years. All were neglected fractures. The average delay in treatment was 10weeks (range 6-14weeks). All patients had closed osteoclasis. The time spent in the TSF varied according to the patient age and bone involved. Ten femoral and 14 tibial fractures were included. Ten patients had superficial pin site infections that resolved with oral antibiotics. Postoperatively, no patient was noted to be more than 5° malrotated on clinical examination and no functional leg length discrepancy was observed. All of the fractures united. Anatomic alignment was achieved in all tibial fracture patients. At the final follow-up, fracture angulation and shortening were fully corrected, and some translational malalignment persisted in 67% of femur fractures. The TSF is an effective definitive method for the treatment of neglected fractures. IV.

Versatility of Taylor Spatial Frame in Gustilo-Anderson III C femoral fractures: report of three cases

Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) combines a multiplanar external fixator and software accuracy for reduction of acute long-bone fractures. The frame gives stability, soft-tissue preservation, adjustability and functionality allowing bone to realize its full osteogenic potential. Three patients with multiple injuries and femoral Gustilo-Anderson type III C have been treated in our center. Initial surgery was performed within 6h of injury with help of vascular surgeon. We used TSF as definitive fixation method. The results were assessed using the functional and radiological scoring system described by Paley and Maar. Fracture union occurred in all limbs and average fixation time was 151.6days. All three patients had excellent outcome in terms of bony and functional ASAMI criteria. The TSF is a valuable tool. It is a definitive method of femoral Gustilo-Anderson type III C fracture care using external fixation with several advantages over previously used devices.

A Guide Frame for the Taylor Spatial Frame

The Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) is a versatile multiplanar external fixator that combines ease of application with computer accuracy to effectively reduce fractures and correct all aspects of deformity in reconstructive orthopaedic surgery. However, postapplication adjustments depend on adequate anteroposterior and lateral radiographic measurements to yield the most accurate output from the program. These radiographs need to be taken in an orthogonal plane to the reference ring. We describe a noninvasive technique using a specifically designed radiolucent frame that can be attached to the TSF to guide the surgeon and radiologist in obtaining lateral and anteroposterior radiographs, with the reference ring perfectly orthogonal in single exposures for each radiographic view. By using this guiding frame, reproducible and consistent x-rays oriented orthogonally to the reference ring at different points in the correction may be achieved, thus eliminating the need for repeat radiographs and radiation exposure for patients, radiologists, and surgeons. In this manner, the mounting parameters and the orientation of the bony deformity will be consistent. This should lead to enhanced accuracy of the TSF correction.