Multimodal Injection Research Articles

State Estimation for Delayed Memristive Neural Networks With Multichannel Round-Robin Protocol and Multimodal Injection Attacks

State Estimation for Delayed Memristive Neural Networks With Multichannel Round-Robin Protocol and Multimodal Injection Attacks

Synergistic Therapy for Graves’ Ophthalmopathy-Associated Eyelid Retraction: Steroid, 5-FU, and Botulinum Neurotoxin a Combination

Background: Graves’ ophthalmopathy (GO) is characterized by upper eyelid retraction (UER), the most prevalent clinical sign. We aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of a multimodal combination of steroids, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) injections in managing UER with GO and analyze the clinical factors in relation to the injection response. Methods: A total of 37 eyes from 23 patients were enrolled for UER with GO. At the endocrinology clinic, the patients were referred to the ophthalmology clinic after taking antithyroid medication for an average of 5.76 months (13 patients), while 10 patients were initially diagnosed with GO and referred to the endocrinology clinic for management of the thyroid hormone function. They performed an orbital computed tomography (CT) scan and measured the cross-sectional area of the orbit, orbital fat, and each extra ocular muscle (EOM) except for the inferior oblique muscle 4 mm behind the eyeball. Each of the EOMs and orbital fat were calculated as a ratio to the total orbit area. A total of 0.1 cc of triamcinolone (40 mg/mL), dexamethasone (5 mg/mL), 5-FU, and BoNT-A (2.5 units) was injected transconjunctivally. Medical records were examined and photographs were utilized to assess MRD1, inferior palpebral fissure (IPF), and lid lag during down gaze before and after the injection. The patients were divided into two groups: responders (more than 1 mm decrease in MRD1 after injection) and non-responders. During the follow-up period (11.0 ± 11.6 months), any potential adverse effects were monitored. Results: CAS decreased from 3.0 ± 0.8 to 1.4 ± 0.5 after the injection, and MRD1 decreased from 5.0 ± 0.9 mm to 4.5 ± 1.3 mm. Sixty percent of the patients were responders. Before and after the injection, the difference between IPF and MRD1 in responders was 0.60 ± 1.10 mm and 0.90 ± 0.90 mm, respectively, whereas, in non-responders, it was −0.57 ± 0.88 mm and −0.15 ± 0.75 mm, respectively. In the responders, pre-injection IPF and FT4 were significantly higher (p < 0.05). Responders had a larger EOM cross-sectional area (153.5 ± 18.0 mm2), including a larger lateral rectus muscle cross-sectional area (37.6 ± 9.7 mm2) than non-responders (132.0 ± 27.9 mm2; 29.1 ± 8.1 mm2). In responders, the treatment effect on IPF and MRD1 remained consistent at 1.2 ± 3.4 mm and 1.2 ± 1.6 mm, respectively, during the latest follow-up assessment. Conclusions: The combination injection of corticosteroids, 5-FU, and BoNT-A would be effective, especially, in patients with hyperthyroidism and an elongated IPF. Additionally, an increase in EOM cross-sectional area on CT, up to 150 mm2, may serve as an additional positive indicator for the use of multimodal injections in UER with GO.

Comparing preemptive injection of peri-articular-multimodal drug with oral celexocib for postoperative pain management in total knee arthroplasty: A randomized clinical trial.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is associated with tremendous postoperative pain, and pain relief should concisely be considered. This study aims to compare the efficacy of preemptive periarticular multimodal drug injection versus placebo and oral celecoxib on postoperative pain control after TKA. This study is a randomized clinical trial on 146 patients candidate for TKA who were randomly allocated to three treatment groups, including (1) a cocktail consisting of bupivacaine, morphine, epinephrine, and ketorolac (n = 48), (2) only epinephrine (placebo group) (n = 49), and (3) 400 mg celecoxib orally (control group) (n = 49) using the Random Allocation software. The injections and oral therapy were performed within 15 min before the surgical procedure. The study's primary outcome was the Knee Society Score (KSS) calculated at baseline, within 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. Range of motion (ROM) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) to assess pain intensity as the other primary outcomes were evaluated before the procedure, within 24 h, 48 h, and 6 weeks postoperatively. The three studied groups were similar regarding demographic characteristics, including age (P = 0.33), gender distribution (P = 0.65), and involved knee side (P = 0.94). Baseline comparison of KSS (P = 0.39), VAS (P = 0.24), and ROM (P = 0.37) among the groups revealed insignificant differences. All the studied groups showed a statistically significant trend of improvement in KSS, VAS, and ROM (P < 0.001), while the comparison of the three groups in terms of KSS (P = 0.001), VAS (P < 0.001), and ROM (P < 0.001) revealed remarkable superiority of multimodal injection to the other treatments. Preemptive periarticular multimodal drug injection, including bupivacaine, morphine, epinephrine, and ketorolac, can cause considerable postoperative pain relief and better ROM achievement in comparison to placebo or oral celecoxib.

Multimodal cocktail analgesic injection in PIVD with lower limb radiculopathy – A mixed design cohart study

BackgroundThe role of Sodium Channel Blocker and steroid is well established for pain relief in neuropathic pain by reducing inflamation and desensitization of nerve roots. Our study aims at analyzing the effectiveness of multimodal cocktail injections for redicular pain relief & functional outcome in patients with intervertebral disc herniation. Material and methodThis was a Mixed design (prospective & retrospective) cohort study; we included 113 patients between the age group of 18–70 years, diagnosed with Prolapse of intervertebral disc (PIVD) with lower limb radiculopathy with MRI finding L4-L5/L5-S1 vertebral disc involvement. Patients were injected with total 15 ml of cocktail injection in 3 divided doses at 3 identified sites in affected lower limb. . Patient was examined & evaluated clinically for VAS pain score, SLRT, Sensory, Motor Examination on day 2, day 7, day 15 & after 1 month. ResultWe found that the mean pre-VAS score was 7.83 followed by the mean VAS score on post 2 days was 1.05, post 7 days was 3.47, post 15 days was 3.9 and post 30 days was 3.81. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean VAS score (p-value<0.0001). After one month majority of patients (54.62%) had comfortable painless walk and comfortable walking distance increased up to 1 km in 45.37% of them. ConclusionUse of cocktail multimodal injections for radiculopathy pain suggests that this non-operative,OPD based technique could be reasonable, efficient, and safe.

Multimodal Peri-articular Injection with Tranexamic Acid can reduce postoperative blood loss versus Intravenous Tranexamic Acid in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundTranexamic acid (TXA) has shown significant reductions in blood loss and transfusion rates in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the optimal administration route continues to be debated. The aim of this trial was to compare the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) versus peri-articular injection (PAI) application of tranexamic acid in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.MethodsWe conducted a randomized controlled, double-blinded study. A total of 93 patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA were randomly distributed between 2 groups: the IV group (47 cases; 1 g TXA IV) and the PAI group (46 cases; 1 g TXA injected peri-articularly). The amount of total and hidden blood loss (HBL), drainage, transfusion rate, hemoglobin and hematocrit drift, and complications were recorded.ResultsPeri-articular injection of TXA reduced total blood loss (P < 0.001) and HBL more than IV use of TXA (P < 0.001). No patients in either group received a transfusion. No symptomatic deep venous thrombosis or other severe complications occurred.ConclusionPeri-articular injection of TXA significantly reduced total blood loss and hidden blood loss to a greater degree than IV injection in total knee arthroplasty without reduction of drainage volume.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-INR-16010270. Date of registration: December 27, 2016.

Tranexamic acid in a periarticular multimodal cocktail injection for blood management in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study

BackgroundThis study aimed to assess the efficacy of tranexamic acid (TXA) mixed in a periarticular multimodal cocktail (PAMC) as a topical administration and to determine whether combined use of intravenous and topical administration is more effective than a single administration of TXA.MethodsA total of 240 patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was enrolled for this prospective randomized controlled study. Patients were divided into three groups of 80 patients each. Baseline data were comparable for all groups. Average follow-up was 18.7 months. Group 1 consisted of patients who received intravenous (IV) TXA, Group 2 patients were those who received TXA in a PAMC injection for topical administration, and Group 3 consisted of patients who received a combination of both intravenous and topical administration of TXA. Primary outcomes were postoperative hemoglobin drop and amount of suction drainage. Secondary outcomes were estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative transfusion rate, and complications.ResultsThe mean postoperative hemoglobin drop was significantly lower in Group 3 (2.13 ± 0.77 g/dL, p=0.004), and there was no difference between Group 1 and Group 2 (2.56 ± 1.07 g/dL vs 2.55 ± 0.86 g/dL, p=0.999). The mean drainage amount was significantly lower in Group 3 (326.58 ± 57.55 ml, p<0.001), and there was no difference between Group 1 and Group 2 (367.93 ± 87.26 ml vs 397.66 ± 104.10 ml, p=0.072). Similarly, the mean EBL was significantly lower in Group 3 (p=0.003), and there was no significant difference between Group 1 and Group 2 (p=0.992). There were no significant differences in requirement for postoperative transfusion rate or incidence of complications among the three groups.ConclusionTXA mixed in a PAMC injection showed a similar effect to IV administration of TXA following TKA. Furthermore, combined use of both IV and PAMC injection provided better perioperative bleeding control with similar safety in patients without relevant comorbidities.Trial registrationWHO ICTRP identifier KCT0005703. Retrospectively registered: 12/24/2020

Efficacy of Periarticular Multimodal Analgesic Injection Containing High-Dose Ketorolac versus Triamcinolone in Early Postoperative Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Periarticular multimodal analgesic injection associates with less postoperative (post-op) pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with less opioid consumption. The combination of additives and dosage are various and controversial. Evidence of ketorolac compared to triamcinolone as an additive is limited in terms of efficacy and safety. Fifty-six patients with unilateral TKA were randomized to receive either 60mg ketorolac or 80mg triamcinolone acetonide as cocktail additives in periarticular injection. Significant threshold was considered if the adjusted mean difference of morphine consumption was greater than 3mg at any timepoint. The primary outcomes were morphine consumptions at immediate post-op, 24 hour (h), 48h, and 72h post-op. Pain visual analogue scale (VAS), knee range of motion, straight leg raising ability, and adverse events were secondary outcomes. Adjusted mean differences (ketorolac-triamcinolone) in morphine consumption were -0.4, 2.5, 2.6, and 2.3mg at given timepoints without significance. No difference observed in pain VAS at rest and during motion, post-op knee extension, and straight leg raising ability. However, post-op knee flexion was significantly higher in triamcinolone group at any timepoints (mean differences 10.3, 10.6, and 9.7, respectively, p<0.05). Periarticular analgesic injection containing 60mg ketorolac provided similar analgesic efficacy and early functional recovery compared with 80mg triamcinolone acetonide. However, triamcinolone may benefit over ketorolac in early post-op knee flexion.

Effect of periarticular multimodal injection versus femoral nerve block on in-hospital rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty in Chinese population: A prospective randomized control trial study

Introduction: Total knee arthroplasty has been adopted to be the most successful treatment for advanced knee osteoarthritis. The adoption of multimodal periarticular analgesic (MPI) has been shown to have satisfactory pain control after surgery. However, there is relatively lack of data investigating whether this mode of pain control is effective in enhancing rehabilitation. Method: This is a prospective randomized control trial from July 2017 to June 2018, including 82 patients, in which 43 of them had MPI injection and 39 of them had no MPI injection. Primary outcome measures included the number of days required to perform straight leg raise, length of hospital stay, and Insall knee score upon discharge. Secondary outcome measures included total dose of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) consumption postoperatively and visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and on motion during postoperative days 1–4. Result: The MPI group performed significantly better than the femoral nerve block (FNB) group in terms of early functional outcome, namely the number of days required to perform straight leg raising and length of hospital stay. The total postoperative PCA consumption and VAS score on motion during postoperative day 1 were also significantly better for MPI group. There was no difference in Insall knee score upon discharge between these two groups. Conclusion: Compared to FNB, MPI depicts a faster inpatient rehabilitation, accounted by its quadriceps-sparing, and better pain relief especially in the early postoperative period.

No Difference in Pain After Spine Surgery with Local Wound Filtration of Morphine and Ketorolac: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Controlling postoperative pain after spinal surgery is important for rehabilitation and patient satisfaction. Wound infiltration with local anesthetics may improve postoperative pain, but true multimodal approaches for achieving analgesia after spinal surgery remain unknown. In this randomized, controlled, double-blind trial after lumbar interbody fusion, we asked: (1) Does multimodal analgesia reduce VAS pain scores by a clinically important amount? (2) Does this analgesic approach reduce the amount of morphine patients consume after surgery? (3) Is this approach associated with fewer opioid-related side effects after surgery? This study included 80 adult patients undergoing lumbar interbody fusion who were randomized into two groups: A control group (n = 40) who received infiltration of the surgical incision at the end of the procedure with an injection of 0.5% bupivacaine 100 mg (20 mL) and epinephrine 0.5 mg (0.5 mL), and the multimodal group (n = 40), who received wound infiltration with the same approach but with different medications: 0.5% bupivacaine 92.5 mg (18.5 mL), ketorolac 30 mg (1 mL), morphine 5 mg (0.5 mL), and epinephrine 0.5 mg (0.5 mL). There were no between-group differences in the proportion of patients who were male, nor in the mean age, height, weight, preoperative pain score, or surgical time. All treatments were administered by one surgeon. All patients, the surgeon, and the researchers were blinded to the allocation of patients to each group. Pain at rest was recorded using the VAS. Postoperative morphine consumption (administered using a patient-controlled analgesia pump) and opiod-associated side effects including nausea/vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention, and respiratory depression were assessed; this study was analyzed according to intention-to-treat principles. No loss to follow-up or protocol deviations were noted. We considered a 2-cm change on a 10-cm scale on the VAS as the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Differences smaller than this were considered unlikely to be important. At no point were there between-group differences in the VAS scores that exceeded the MCID, indicating no clinically important reductions in pain associated with administering multimodal injections. The highest treatment effect was observed at 3 hours that showed only a -1.3 cm mean difference between the multimodal and the control groups (3.2 ± 1.8 versus 4.5 ± 1.9 [95% CI -1.3 to -0.3]; p < 0.001), which was below the MCID. Morphine consumption was very slightly higher in the control group than in the multimodal group (2.8 ± 2.8 versus 0.3 ± 1.0, mean difference 2.47; p < 0.001). The percentage of patients reporting opioid-related side effects was lower in the multimodal group than in the control group. The proportions of nausea and vomiting were higher in the control group (30% [12 of 40] than in the multimodal group (3% [1 of 40]; p = 0.001). All of these side effects were transient and none was severe. Multimodal wound infiltration with an NSAID and morphine did not yield any clinically important reduction in pain or opioid consumption. Since no substantial benefit of adding these drugs to a patient's aftercare regimen was achieved, and considering the potential risks of administering opioids and NSAIDs (such as, polypharmacy in older patients, serious adverse effects of NSAIDs), we recommend against routine use of this approach in clinical practice. Level I, therapeutic study.

PERIARTICULAR REGIONAL ANALGESIA REDUCES PAIN AND HOSPITAL STAY AFTER TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, AND DOUBLE-BLINDED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Objective: There are multiple post-operative pain protocols for patients who undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Post-operative analgesia with opioids or epidural analgesia has its side effect. We compared the duration of hospital stay, pain score, and range of motion of a control group who had no local infiltration with a group who had local infiltration analgesia following TKA.&#x0D; Methods: Randomization was done in 60 patients who underwent TKA in two groups, one who did not receive and the other who received a multimodal cocktail periarticular injection containing 30 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine, 1 ml of 30 mg ketorolac, 1 ml of 1 in 1000 adrenaline, 2 ml of 80 mg gentamycin, 5 ml of 750 mg cefuroxime, and rest 0.9% of normal saline. Visual analog score (VAS) for pain at rest was recorded and assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 2, 6, 12, 24, 36 h, 2, 3, and 7 days and during an activity at 24 h, 36 h, 2, 3, and 7 days.&#x0D; Results: The patient who had received the local injection used very few analgesics over the first 24 h of surgery. Moreover, patients, where local infiltration was used, showed lower VAS for pain (at rest and during activity). They also showed higher VAS for patients’ satisfaction.&#x0D; Conclusion: Due to the reduced post-operative pain with periarticular injection analgesia, it was observed that the pain and duration of hospital stay were significantly reduced.

Does Surgical-site Multimodal Drug Injection After Palmar Plating of Distal Radius Fractures Improve Pain Scores?

Does Surgical-site Multimodal Drug Injection After Palmar Plating of Distal Radius Fractures Improve Pain Scores?

Intra-operative periarticular multimodal injection in total knee arthroplasty: a local hospital experience in Hong Kong.

Data from a local report revealed the superior outcome of regional anaesthesia and analgesia compared with general anaesthesia and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in total knee arthroplasty. This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy of intra-operative periarticular multimodal injection in improving postoperative pain and reducing morphine consumption with patient-controlled analgesia after total knee arthroplasty in patients with knee osteoarthritis. From July 2005 to May 2009, 213 total knee arthroplasties without intra-operative periarticular multimodal injection (control group) were performed at a local hospital. From June 2009 to December 2012, 185 total knee arthroplasties were performed with intra-operative periarticular multimodal injection (cocktail group). The inclusion criteria were osteoarthritis of the knee, single method of anaesthesia (general or neuraxial), simple total knee arthroplasty without any metal augmentation or constraint, and postoperative patient-controlled analgesia. Postoperative patient-controlled morphine doses were compared. A total of 152 total knee arthroplasties were recruited to the cocktail group, and 89 to the control group. Duration of tourniquet application and preoperative knee score did not significantly correlate with morphine consumption by patient-controlled analgesia. Multimodal injection significantly decreased such consumption for 36 h. When injection was separately analysed for general and neuraxial anaesthesia, the effect lasted for 42 h and 24 h, respectively. Intra-operative periarticular multimodal injection decreased morphine consumption for up to 42 h postoperatively.

Pre-emptive injection of peri-articular-multimodal drug for post-operative pain management in total knee arthroplasty: a double-blind randomized clinical trial.

Severe post-operative pain is one of the main problems after total knee arthroplasty. In this study, we investigated the effect of a peri-articular multimodal drugs injections pre-emptively on post-operative pain control and knee functions following total knee arthroplasty. This study was a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Eligible cases including 137 patients-aged 30 to 80years old-were randomly divided into one of two groups: the drug group received a cocktail consisting of bupivacaine hydrochloride, morphine sulphate, epinephrine, and ketorolac. The control group received epinephrine only. The injections were given 15minutes before incision. Joint range of motion (ROM) and the severity of pain by using visual analog scale (VAS) of 1 to 10 and patient's facial expression, were assessed in the pre-operative visit, after 24hours, 48hours, and sixweeks after operation. Knee Society score (KSS) was recorded before the operation, sixweeks, and sixmonths after the operation for each patient. The data of VAS showed no significant difference between the groups before operation but there was statistically significant difference between the two groups at 24hours, 48hours, and sixweeks after the operation. In KSS, difference was not significant between the two groups before the operation and sixmonths after surgery while our results showed a statistically significant difference between groups sixweeks after the operation. In ROM, there was no significant difference between the groups before operation. There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups at 24hours, 48hours and six weeks after the operation. Complications were recorded at sixweeks after surgery. Peri-articular multimodal injection including bupivacaine, morphine, and ketorolac preferably with pre-emptive injection method provided proper post-operative pain relief, less opioid consumption, and better early rehabilitation following TKA at 48hours after surgery. Level I.

Pain Management after Total Knee Arthoplasty Using Multimodal Local Periarticular Injections

Pain Management after Total Knee Arthoplasty Using Multimodal Local Periarticular Injections

関節周囲多剤カクテル注射に含まれたモルヒネの関与が強く疑われた人工膝関節置換術の術後呼吸抑制の1例

関節周囲多剤カクテル注射に含まれたモルヒネの関与が強く疑われた人工膝関節置換術の術後呼吸抑制の1例

Comparison study of postoperative pain control for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair; Multimodal injection versus Buprenorphine transdermal patch

Comparison study of postoperative pain control for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair; Multimodal injection versus Buprenorphine transdermal patch

The efficacy of intraoperative multimodal analgesic injection for postoperative pain control following wrist surgery

Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of intraoperative muhimodal analgesic injection for postoperative pain control following wrist surgery. Methods From September 2006 to October 2008, 62 patients with distal radius fractures were surgically treated. All fractures were stabilized with AO volar plates via Henry approach. Intraoperafively the patients were randomized to either receive an intraopemfive muhimodal analgesic injection containing ropivacaine, epimorphine, betamethasone and epinephrine (Group MI) or to receive no injection ( Group NMI). Visual analog scores for postoperative pain during rest and activity were recorded. Narcotics consumption and the side effects were monitored. Results Visual analog scores for pain during rest and postoperative activity in Group MI were lower than those in Group NMI with statistically significant differences. There was less postoperative narcotics consumption in Group MI than in Group NMI. No complications were found in both groups. Conclusion Intraoperative multimodal analgesic injection is an effective approach to control postoperative pain following wrist surgery. It can lead to a quick functional recovery in patients with less comphcations. Key words: Wrist; Surgical procedures,operative; Injections; Multimodal analgesia