Objective: To evaluate inferential and macrostructural ability through three types of multimodal artifacts: verbal, graphic-mathematical, and complete text (which integrates all semiotic modes). Theoretical Framework: This section explores the key concepts of multimodality theory, as well as the notions of inferences and multimodal ability, which are fundamental to addressing the research problem. The main theories and concepts supporting the research are presented, providing a solid foundation for understanding the study's context. Method: A mixed methodology was employed, combining quantitative and qualitative approaches. The quantitative phase adopted a correlational ex post facto design, while the qualitative phase was carried out through a focus group. The quantitative study followed a factorial experimental between-subjects design, considering two dimensions: the participants' professional program and the semiotic systems present in the comprehension test. Results and Discussion: It was concluded that the type of multimodal artifact does not significantly affect the efficient identification of inferences or macrostructural reduction. This suggests that students exhibit a low level of multimodal ability. Research Implications: The practical and theoretical implications of the research are analyzed, providing insights into how the results can influence or be applied to practices related to multimodal comprehension. Originality/Value: The research highlights that universities, in general, do not pay sufficient attention to multimodality, which negatively impacts students' multimodal competencies.
Read full abstract