Multifactorial Fall Risk Assessment Research Articles

Telemedicine-Based Risk Program to Prevent Falls Among Older Adults: Protocol for a Randomized Quality Improvement Trial.

The Center for Disease Control and Prevention's Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) initiative offers health care providers tools and resources to assist with fall risk screening and multifactorial fall risk assessment and interventions. Its effectiveness has never been evaluated in a randomized trial. This study aims to describe the protocol for the STEADI Options Randomized Quality Improvement Trial (RQIT), which was designed to evaluate the impact on falls and all-cause health expenditures of a telemedicine-based form of STEADI implemented among older adults aged 65 years and older, within a primary care setting. STEADI Options was a pragmatic RQIT implemented within a health system comparing a telemedicine version of the STEADI fall risk assessment to the standard of care (SOC). Before screening, we randomized all eligible patients in participating clinics into the STEADI arm or SOC arm based on their scheduled provider. All received the Stay Independent screener (SIS) to determine fall risk. Patients were considered at risk for falls if they scored 4 or more on the SIS or answered affirmatively to any 1 of the 3 key questions within the SIS. Patients screened at risk for falls and randomized to the STEADI arm were offered a registered nurse (RN)-led STEADI assessment through telemedicine; the RN provided assessment results and recommendations to the providers, who were advised to discuss fall-prevention strategies with their patients. Patients screened at risk for falls and randomized to the SOC arm were asked to participate in study data collection only. Data on recruitment, STEADI assessments, use of recommended prevention services, medications, and fall occurrences were collected using electronic health records and patient surveys. Using staff time diaries and administrative records, the study prospectively collected data on STEADI implementation costs and all-cause outpatient and inpatient charges incurred over the year following enrollment. The study enrolled 720 patients (n=307, 42.6% STEADI arm; n=353, 49% SOC arm; and n=60, 8.3% discontinued arm) from September 2020 to December 2021. Follow-up data collection was completed in January 2023. As of February 2024, data analysis is complete, and results are expected to be published by the end of 2025. The STEADI RQIT evaluates the impact of a telemedicine-based, STEADI-based fall risk assessment on falls and all-cause health expenditures and can provide information on the intervention's effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05390736, http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05390736. RR1-10.2196/54395.

Combining user-centered design and behavioral theory to enhance health technologies: A personas-based approach for a primary-care based multifactorial falls risk assessment tool

IntroductionMultifactorial falls risk assessment tools (FRATs) can be an effective falls prevention method for older adults, but are often underutilized by health care professionals (HCPs). This study aims to enhance the use and implementation of multifactorial FRATs by combining behavioral theory with the user-centered design (UCD) method of personas construction. Specifically, the study aimed to (1) construct personas that are based on external (i.e., needs, preferences) and intrinsic user characteristics (i.e., behavioral determinants); and (2) use these insights to inform requirements for optimizing an existing Dutch multifactorial FRAT (i.e., the ‘Valanalyse’). MethodsSurvey data from HCPs (n = 31) was used to construct personas of the ‘Valanalyse.’ To examine differences between clusters on 68 clustering variables, a multivariate cluster analysis technique with non-parametric analyses and computational methods was used. The aggregated external and intrinsic user characteristics of personas were used to inform key design and implementation requirements for the ‘Valanalyse,’ respectively, whereby intrinsic user characteristics were matched with appropriate behavior change techniques to guide implementation. ResultsSignificant differences between clusters were observed in 20 clustering variables (e.g., behavioral beliefs, situations for use). These variables were used to construct six personas representing users of each cluster. Together, the six personas helped operationalize four key design requirements (e.g., guide treatment-related decision making) and 14 implementation strategies (e.g., planning coping responses) for optimizing the ‘Valanalyse’ in Dutch geriatric, primary care settings. ConclusionThe findings suggest that theory- and evidence-based personas that encompass both external and intrinsic user characteristics are a useful method for understanding how the use and implementation of multifactorial FRATs can be optimized with and for HCPs, providing important implications for developers and eHealth interventions with regards to encouraging technology adoption.

Practices of falls risk assessment and prevention in acute hospital settings: a realist investigation.

Falls are the most common safety incident reported by acute hospitals. The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence recommends multifactorial falls risk assessment and tailored interventions, but implementation is variable. To determine how and in what contexts multifactorial falls risk assessment and tailored interventions are used in acute National Health Service hospitals in England. Realist review and multisite case study. (1) Systematic searches to identify stakeholders' theories, tested using empirical data from primary studies. Review of falls prevention policies of acute Trusts. (2) Theory testing and refinement through observation, staff interviews (n = 50), patient and carer interviews (n = 31) and record review (n = 60). Three Trusts, one orthopaedic and one older person ward in each. Seventy-eight studies were used for theory construction and 50 for theory testing. Four theories were explored. (1) Leadership: wards had falls link practitioners but authority to allocate resources for falls prevention resided with senior nurses. (2) Shared responsibility: a key falls prevention strategy was patient supervision. This fell to nursing staff, constraining the extent to which responsibility for falls prevention could be shared. (3) Facilitation: assessments were consistently documented but workload pressures could reduce this to a tick-box exercise. Assessment items varied. While individual patient risk factors were identified, patients were categorised as high or low risk to determine who should receive supervision. (4) Patient participation: nursing staff lacked time to explain to patients their falls risks or how to prevent themselves from falling, although other staff could do so. Sensitive communication could prevent patients taking actions that increase their risk of falling. Within the realist review, we completed synthesis for only two theories. We could not access patient records before observations, preventing assessment of whether care plans were enacted. (1) Leadership: There should be a clear distinction between senior nurses' roles and falls link practitioners in relation to falls prevention; (2) shared responsibility: Trusts should consider how processes and systems, including the electronic health record, can be revised to better support a multidisciplinary approach, and alternatives to patient supervision should be considered; (3) facilitation: Trusts should consider how to reduce documentation burden and avoid tick-box responses, and ensure items included in the falls risk assessment tools align with guidance. Falls risk assessment tools and falls care plans should be presented as tools to support practice, rather than something to be audited; (4) patient participation: Trusts should consider how they can ensure patients receive individualised information about risks and preventing falls and provide staff with guidance on brief but sensitive ways to talk with patients to reduce the likelihood of actions that increase their risk of falling. (1) Development and evaluation of interventions to support multidisciplinary teams to undertake, and involve patients in, multifactorial falls risk assessment and selection and delivery of tailored interventions; (2) mixed method and economic evaluations of patient supervision; (3) evaluation of engagement support workers, volunteers and/or carers to support falls prevention. Research should include those with cognitive impairment and patients who do not speak English. This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020184458. This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR129488) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 5. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Nursing Interventions to Empower Family Caregivers to Manage the Risk of Falling in Older Adults: A Scoping Review.

Falls pose a significant risk to older adults, resulting in injuries and declining quality of life. The psychological impact, particularly the fear of falling, impairs their well-being. This pervasive fear affects daily activities, leading to self-imposed limitations and reduced engagement. This review aimed to identify nursing interventions to empower family caregivers to manage the risk of falling in older adults. A scoping review was developed following the JBI framework. We searched the CINAHL, MEDLINE, Nursing & Allied Health Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MedicLatina, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. The findings of this review revealed that out of 460 initially identified records, nine articles met the eligibility criteria and were retained for further in-depth analysis. These articles provided insights into nine distinct categories of nurse interventions: Therapeutic Relationships, Family Involvement, Personalized Care, Health Education, Multifactorial Falls Risk Assessment, Home Modifications, Referral, Transition Between Healthcare Services, and Health Care Consultants. The findings of this review have significant implications for clinical practice, particularly in emphasizing the crucial role of nurses in empowering family caregivers and older adults to manage the risk of falling at home. Healthcare professionals, policymakers, and researchers can benefit from this informative resource to develop strategies and guidelines.

1971 Five years of the National Audit of Inpatient Falls

Abstract Introduction There are around 250,000 inpatient falls in English hospitals each year. Inpatient falls are associated with poor outcomes. Evidence suggests multifactorial assessment and intervention is the most effective way to prevent inpatient falls. There are National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) quality standards for safe post fall management. National audit supports improvement in the quality and safety of clinical care. Methods The National Audit of Inpatient Falls (NAIF) began collecting continuous data from all femoral fractures (as identified on the National Hip Fracture Database) in England and Wales from 2019. Prospective documentation review collects data on multifactorial falls risk assessment (MFRA) prior to the femoral fracture as well as immediate post fall management and presents performance indicators related to NICE guidelines/quality standards. Results There are around 2000 inpatient femoral fractures each year. Those with an inpatient fracture have double the 30-day mortality of those who fracture elsewhere, highlighting the vulnerability of this group of patients. There has been improvement in most aspects of MFRA and the proportion of patients checked for injury before moving from the floor has increased from 69 to 77%, use of flat lifting equipment from 22 to 29% and medical assessment within 30mins of the fall from 52 to 60%. Conclusion There have been steady improvements in guideline compliant inpatient fall-prevention and post-fall management, but there is more to do. The programme also produces improvement resources and activities and will be expanding the range injuries covered in the next 2 years.

96 Implementing Multifactorial Falls Risk Assessments in the community for older adults at high risk of falls

Abstract Background Falls prevention improves health outcomes and reduces healthcare costs. New world guidelines for falls prevention and management in older adults exist. Older adults identified at high risk of falls should receive a Multifactorial Falls Risk Assessment (MFRA). A review of the use of MFRA across community healthcare divisions was undertaken in November 2022. It was noted that many variations of falls risk stratification existed, and implementation of a MFRA was not routine. This study aimed to implement a MFRA on all identified at high risk of falls. Methods Stakeholder engagement and project team (n = 14) development of physiotherapy, occupational therapy, podiatry, dietetics, and nursing was undertaken. A falls pathway was developed, outcome measures agreed, and a service user education booklet designed. Inclusion criteria incorporated older adults over 65 referred due to a fall, fall-related injury or through opportunistic case finding. A survey and focus group were undertaken. Qualitative and quantitative data was collated. Results 186 participants were risk stratified resulting in high (56%), moderate (29%), low (24%) risk. A MFRA was completed on all identified as high-risk. Their profile encompassed, 57% aged 80 and above; 35% opportunistic screening; 70% fell at home; 14% sustained a fracture; 64% presented as frail. Service user engagement themes; importance of good information ‘booklet very helpful’; under-reporting of falls ‘I feel embarrassed’. Conclusion Results highlighted 56% of older adults identified as high risk crossed all divisions of our healthcare system, indicating falls risk stratification and implementation of MFRA is every healthcare professional’s responsibility. Opportunistic case finding is necessary as older adults (35%) may not present following a fall. Good sources of information are needed to engage in falls prevention behaviours.

62 Falls prevention is everyone’s business

Abstract Background Falls among inpatients are the most commonly reported incident within the HSE and HSE funded services (NIMS). For older persons with multiple comorbidities and frailty, even a ‘minor’ injury following a fall can have a significant effect in terms of impaired or delayed rehabilitation, loss of confidence, longer stay in hospital and ultimately, a poorer quality of life. In our Hospital as part of our fall prevention strategy, an education programme for all Staff was launched to raise awareness of falls prevention and management of patients post falls. Methods In 2021 Ward A, a post -acute care rehabilitation ward had a high incidence of falls N = 56. In collaboration with Ward A’s Clinical Nurse Managers, Falls Prevention Committee, Quality Improvement and Practice Development Department a plan of action was developed to reduce the number of patients’ falls. Formal Monthly Education Awareness training for all Staff and informal Ward based training were implemented which included: Overview of falls risk factors, Information on the impact of patient falls, A review of the Hospital’s falls prevention programme and policy, Roll out of a new Multifactorial Falls Risk Assessment form which addresses risk factors and interventions to reduce falls, Reviewing the link between falls and frailty, Promoting safe mobility and activity for patients, Falls Safety Cross—to raise awareness within the team and others regarding the falls/near misses being tracked monthly and Post-fall management of patients. Results In 2021 Ward A recorded N = 56 patient falls. Following the above interventions, the number of patient falls reduced to N = 37, 34% by Quarter 42,022. Staff evaluation highlighted that staff knowledge and awareness of falls prevention and post fall management had increased. Conclusion Falls awareness training had a positive impact on reducing falls in a Rehabilitation ward.

93 Reduce falls rates in care homes by replacing falls risk screening with a Multifactorial Falls Risk Assessment Tool

Abstract Background Following a review (Nov 2022) of 203 residents across four locations, it was noted that falls risk screening tools were used to identify falls risk status. This resulted in a proportion of residents identified as low (5%) and medium risk (28%). New falls prevention guidelines incorporating care homes, recommend against falls risk screening (Montero-Odassa et al, 2022). The guidelines recommend that all residents in care homes should be considered at high risk of falls and use of a Multifactorial Falls Risk Assessment Tool (MFRAT) is preferable in falls prevention. Our aim is a reduction in falls rate by discontinuing the use of falls risk screening tools and implementing a MFRAT. Embed this change within a new standardised falls policy and deliver staff education sessions to support this change. Methods Stakeholder engagement and development of a falls committee with seven representatives across each location including nursing, management, quality and patient safety advisor and falls coordinator was undertaken. Communication strategy of weekly online meetings developed a standardised falls policy, tailored MFRAT and audit tool to monitor compliance. Reported falls were cross referenced with our national incident management system. Falls rate calculation across each location was used to measure the impact of change. Results Results demonstrated a 29% reduction in falls rate for the first quarter of 2023, compared to 2022. 100% compliance with policy implementation across all locations, with 68% of staff trained through education sessions face to face and online. Conclusion Implementing a MFRAT, aligned with new world guidelines, supported by staff education, and associated falls prevention interventions provides a reduction in fall rates in care home residents. The process of falls rate calculation across locations provides ease of evaluation.

Exploring variation in implementation of multifactorial falls risk assessment and tailored interventions: a realist review

BackgroundFalls are the most common safety incident reported by acute hospitals. In England national guidance recommends delivery of a multifactorial falls risk assessment (MFRA) and interventions tailored to address individual falls risk factors. However, there is variation in how these practices are implemented. This study aimed to explore the variation by examining what supports or constrains delivery of MFRAs and tailored interventions in acute hospitals.MethodsA realist review of literature was conducted with searches completed in three stages: (1) to construct hypotheses in the form of Context, Mechanism, Outcome configurations (CMOc) about how MFRAs and interventions are delivered, (2) to scope the breadth and depth of evidence available in Embase to test the CMOcs, and (3) following prioritisation of CMOcs, to refine search strategies for use in multiple databases. Citations were managed in EndNote; titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened, with 10% independently screened by two reviewers.ResultsTwo CMOcs were prioritised for testing labelled: Facilitation via MFRA tools, and Patient Participation in interventions. Analysis indicated that MFRA tools can prompt action, but the number and type of falls risk factors included in tools differ across organisations leading to variation in practice. Furthermore, the extent to which tools work as prompts is influenced by complex ward conditions such as changes in patient condition, bed swaps, and availability of falls prevention interventions. Patient participation in falls prevention interventions is more likely where patient directed messaging takes individual circumstances into account, e.g., not wanting to disturb nurses by using the call bell. However, interactions that elicit individual circumstances can be resource intensive and patients with cognitive impairment may not be able to participate despite appropriately directed messaging.ConclusionsOrganisations should consider how tools can be developed in ways that better support consistent and comprehensive identification of patients’ individual falls risk factors and the complex ward conditions that can disrupt how tools work as facilitators. Ward staff should be supported to deliver patient directed messaging that is informed by their individual circumstances to encourage participation in falls prevention interventions, where appropriate.Trial registrationPROSPERO: CRD42020184458.

Synthesis in French of the 2022 global recommendations for the management and prevention of falls in the elderly

Falls and fall-related injuries are common in older adults, have negative effects on functional independence and quality of life and are associated with increased morbidity, mortality and health related costs. To synthesize evidence-based and expert consensus-based 2022 world guidelines for the management and prevention of falls in older adults. These recommendations consider a person-centred approach that includes the preferences of the patient, caregivers and other stakeholders, gaps in previous guidelines, recent developments in e-health and both local context and resources. All older adults should be advised on falls prevention and physical activity. Opportunistic case finding for falls risk is recommended for communitydwelling older adults. An algorithm is proposed to stratify falls risk and interventions for persons at low, moderate or high risk. Those considered at high risk should be offered a comprehensive multifactorial falls risk assessment with a view to co-design and implement personalised multidomain interventions. Other recommendations cover details of assessment and intervention components and combinations, and recommendations for specific settings and populations. The core set of recommendations provided will require flexible implementation strategies that consider both local context and resources.

A multifactorial fall risk assessment system for older people utilizing a low-cost, markerless Microsoft Kinect

Falls among older people are a major health concern. This study aims to develop a multifactorial fall risk assessment system for older people using a low-cost, markerless Microsoft Kinect. A Kinect-based test battery was designed to comprehensively assess major fall risk factors. A follow-up experiment was conducted with 102 older participants to assess their fall risks. Participants were divided into high and low fall risk groups based on their prospective falls over a 6-month period. Results showed that the high fall risk group performed significantly worse on the Kinect-based test battery. The developed random forest classification model achieved an average classification accuracy of 84.7%. In addition, the individual’s performance was computed as the percentile value of a normative database to visualise deficiencies and targets for intervention. These findings indicate that the developed system can not only screen out ‘at risk’ older individuals with good accuracy, but also identify potential fall risk factors for effective fall intervention. Practitioner summary: Falls are the leading cause of injuries in older people. We newly developed a multifactorial fall risk assessment system for older people utilising a low-cost, markerless Kinect. Results showed that the developed system can screen out ‘at risk’ individuals and identify potential risk factors for effective fall intervention.

Inclusion body myositis in an older patient following a fall

After experiencing a fall, an 82-year-old woman developed progressive loss of lower limb strength and was diagnosed with inclusion body myositis. Although falls and muscle weakness are often regarded as consequences of aging, inclusion body myositis should be considered in a patient with a history of multiple falls.

Incidence of falls and fall-related injuries and their predictive factors in frail older persons with cancer: a multicenter study

BackgroundFalls and fall-related injuries are a major public health problem. Data on falls in older persons with cancer is limited and robust data on falls within those with a frailty profile are missing. The aim of this study is to investigate the incidence and predictive factors for falls and fall-related injuries in frail older persons with cancer.MethodsThis study is a secondary data analysis from data previously collected in a large prospective multicenter observational cohort study in older persons with cancer in 22 Belgian hospitals (November 2012–February 2015). Patients ≥70 years with a malignant tumor and a frailty profile based on an abnormal G8 score were included upon treatment decision and evaluated with a Geriatric Assessment (GA). At follow-up, data on falls and fall-related injuries were documented.ResultsAt baseline 2141 (37.2%) of 5759 included patients reported at least one fall in the past 12 months, 1427 patients (66.7%) sustained an injury. Fall-related data of 3681 patients were available at follow-up and at least one fall was reported by 769 patients (20.9%) at follow-up, of whom 289 (37.6%) fell more than once and a fall-related injury was reported by 484 patients (62.9%). Fear of falling was reported in 47.4% of the patients at baseline and in 55.6% of the patients at follow-up. In multivariable analysis, sex and falls history in the past 12 months were predictive factors for both falls and fall-related injuries at follow-up. Other predictive factors for falls, were risk for depression, cognitive impairment, dependency in activities of daily living, fear of falling, and use of professional home care.ConclusionGiven the high number of falls and fall-related injuries and high prevalence of fear of falling, multifactorial falls risk assessment and management programs should be integrated in the care of frail older persons with cancer. Further studies with long-term follow-up, subsequent impact on cancer treatment and interventions for fall prevention, and integration of other important topics like medication and circumstances of a fall, are warranted.Trial registrationB322201215495.

World guidelines for falls prevention and management for older adults: a global initiative.

Backgroundfalls and fall-related injuries are common in older adults, have negative effects on functional independence and quality of life and are associated with increased morbidity, mortality and health related costs. Current guidelines are inconsistent, with no up-to-date, globally applicable ones present.Objectivesto create a set of evidence- and expert consensus-based falls prevention and management recommendations applicable to older adults for use by healthcare and other professionals that consider: (i) a person-centred approach that includes the perspectives of older adults with lived experience, caregivers and other stakeholders; (ii) gaps in previous guidelines; (iii) recent developments in e-health and (iv) implementation across locations with limited access to resources such as low- and middle-income countries.Methodsa steering committee and a worldwide multidisciplinary group of experts and stakeholders, including older adults, were assembled. Geriatrics and gerontological societies were represented. Using a modified Delphi process, recommendations from 11 topic-specific working groups (WGs), 10 ad-hoc WGs and a WG dealing with the perspectives of older adults were reviewed and refined. The final recommendations were determined by voting.Recommendationsall older adults should be advised on falls prevention and physical activity. Opportunistic case finding for falls risk is recommended for community-dwelling older adults. Those considered at high risk should be offered a comprehensive multifactorial falls risk assessment with a view to co-design and implement personalised multidomain interventions. Other recommendations cover details of assessment and intervention components and combinations, and recommendations for specific settings and populations.Conclusionsthe core set of recommendations provided will require flexible implementation strategies that consider both local context and resources.

Effectiveness and Usability of a Novel Kinect-Based Tailored Interactive Fall Intervention System for Fall Prevention in Older People: A Preliminary Study

Falls are prevalent among older people and can lead to serious health problems. We newly developed a novel Kinect-based tailored interactive fall intervention system, which seamlessly integrates multifactorial fall risk assessment and tailored intervention programs to prevent falls in older people. This preliminary study aimed to examine the effectiveness and usability of this developed system for fall prevention in older people. Thirty community-dwelling older women participated in this experiment; they were allocated to an intervention group (IG) or a control group (CG) for a quasi-randomized trial (15 people each). Participants in IG followed an 8-week tailored intervention (40 min/session × 2 sessions/week × 8 weeks) using the Kinect-based interactive fall intervention system, while participants in CG maintained their habitual activities. Various outcome measures were evaluated at baseline (Week 0), interim (Week 4), and post-intervention (Week 8). Experimental results showed that IG led to significant improvements in TUG-Timed Up and Go (p = 0.010), BBS-Berg Balance Scale (p = 0.011), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment-MoCA (p = 0.022) between baseline and post-intervention. In comparison to the baseline, TUG and BBS were even significantly improved at interim (p = 0.004 and 0.047, respectively). There were no significant changes in static balance-related performance outcomes and the Short Falls Efficacy Scale-SFES after the intervention. Whereas in CG, most performance measures did not show significant changes during the 8-week period, TUG completion time became significantly longer at post-intervention in comparison to interim (p = 0.028) and fear of falling was also significantly higher at post-intervention than baseline (p = 0.021). These findings suggest that the Kinect-based 8-week tailored interactive fall interventions effectively improved older people's physical and cognitive abilities. Regarding the usability of the developed system, the average System Usability Scale (SUS) score was 83.5 out of 100, indicating excellent system usability. The overall mean Computer Literacy Scale (CLS) score was 2.5 out of 26, showing that older participants in this study had very limited experience with computers. No significant correlation between SUS and CLS scores demonstrated that newly developed Kinect-based tailored interactive fall intervention system was easy to use for older people, regardless of their computer experience. This novel system should help health professionals and older people proactively manage the risk of falls.

Development of a Screening Tool for Feet/Footwear- Related Influences on Fall Risk

The effectiveness of multifactorial fall risk assessment and intervention strategies is well documented. Although identifying feet/footwear-related influences on fall risk is a vital fall risk assessment component, few evidence-based resources or screening tools are available. To address this need, we developed the Screening Tool for Feet/Footwear-Related Influences on Fall Risk. Our tool is designed for older adults who are identified as at risk for falling, based on the CDC’s Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI) Algorithm for Fall Risk Screening, Assessment, and Intervention. Tool development was informed by results of our systematic review of lower-limb factors associated with balance and falls. Our initial tool was evaluated by an external group of 9 interprofessional content experts. Those experts recommended modification of 8 items and rated the tool’s clarity as 81.2/100, appeal as 79.1/100, and clinical feasibility as 76.1/100. After incorporating recommended changes, we completed a modified Delphi study using 8 new interprofessional experts (average years of experience: 19.3). During Phase 1, Delphi participants recommended we combine items with similar treatment recommendations, add a question about orthoses, and increase the specificity of 9 items. This refinement resulted in a 20-item screening tool, which met approval after two rounds of consensus voting. Approval was defined based on the Item Content Validation Index, percentage of agreement > 80% on each item. The high level of agreement illustrates the tool’s content validity. Using our tool, an older adult’s feet/footwear-related risk factors can be identified and incorporated into an effective multifactorial fall prevention intervention.

Development and validation of a continuous fall risk score in community-dwelling older people: an ecological approach

BackgroundFall risk assessment in older people is of major importance for providing adequate preventive measures. Current predictive models are mainly focused on intrinsic risk factors and do not adjust for contextual exposure. The validity and utility of continuous risk scores have already been demonstrated in clinical practice in several diseases. In this study, we aimed to develop and validate an intrinsic-exposure continuous fall risk score (cFRs) for community-dwelling older people through standardized residuals.MethodsSelf-reported falls in the last year were recorded from 504 older persons (391 women: age 73.1 ± 6.5 years; 113 men: age 74.0 ± 6.1 years). Participants were categorized as occasional fallers (falls ≤1) or recurrent fallers (≥ 2 falls). The cFRs was derived for each participant by summing the standardized residuals (Z-scores) of the intrinsic fall risk factors and exposure factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the accuracy of the cFRs for identifying recurrent fallers.ResultsThe cFRs varied according to the number of reported falls; it was lowest in the group with no falls (− 1.66 ± 2.59), higher in the group with one fall (0.05 ± 3.13, p < 0.001), and highest in the group with recurrent fallers (2.82 ± 3.94, p < 0.001). The cFRs cutoff level yielding the maximal sensitivity and specificity for identifying recurrent fallers was 1.14, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.790 (95% confidence interval: 0.746–0.833; p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe cFRs was shown to be a valid dynamic multifactorial fall risk assessment tool for epidemiological analyses and clinical practice. Moreover, the potential for the cFRs to become a widely used approach regarding fall prevention in community-dwelling older people was demonstrated, since it involves a holistic intrinsic-exposure approach to the phenomena. Further investigation is required to validate the cFRs with other samples since it is a sample-specific tool.

Clinical Audit as a Quality Improvement Tool in Measurements of Lying and Standing Blood Pressure for Elderly Patients Admitted With a Hip Fracture.

Background: Around one in three adults aged 65 years and over will have a fall at home within a one-year period. Falls are estimated to cost the NHS more than £2.3 billion per year. The National Institute for Health & Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommend older people who present for medical attention because of a fall, report recurrent falls in the past year, or demonstrate abnormalities of gait and/or balance should be offered a multifactorial falls risk assessment which includes a cardiovascular examination and review of medications. Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is a common cardiovascular disorder, independently associated with an increased risk of falls in the elderly.Aims & Objectives: This study was carried out to assess improvement in lying and standing blood pressure (LSBP) measurement using clinical audit and staff education.Method: An initial audit of patients over the age of 60, admitted with a hip fracture between the 14th of April and the 25th of May 2020 to assess measurement and accurate recording of LSBP. This cycle was followed by brainstorming, root cause analysis, teaching sessions for staff, and use of aide-memoires. A second audit cycle of patients was admitted with a hip fracture secondary to a fall between the 10th of August and the 21st of September 2020.Result: Our initial audit results showed 68% of patients who met the criteria in the NICE guidelines on measurement of LSBP were not being assessed for OH. Following interventions, the second audit cycle showed significant improvement in compliance, confirming audits to be a powerful tool in quality improvement programs.

A Systematic Review of the Guidelines and Delphi Study for the Multifactorial Fall Risk Assessment of Community-Dwelling Elderly.

As falls are among the most common causes of injury for the elderly, the prevention and early intervention are necessary. Fall assessment tools that include a variety of factors are recommended for preventing falls, but there is a lack of such tools. This study developed a multifactorial fall risk assessment tool based on current guidelines and validated it from the perspective of professionals. We followed the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology’s guidelines in this systematic review. We used eight international and five Korean databases to search for appropriate guidelines. Based on the review results, we conducted the Delphi survey in three rounds; one open round and two scoring rounds. About nine experts in five professional areas participated in the Delphi study. We included nine guidelines. After conducting the Delphi study, the final version of the “Multifactorial Fall Risk Assessment tool for Community-Dwelling Older People” (MFA-C) has 36 items in six factors; general characteristics, behavior factors, disease history, medication history, physical function, and environmental factors. The validity of the MFA-C tool was largely supported by various academic fields. It is expected to be beneficial to the elderly in the community when it comes to tailored interventions to prevent falls.

Development and validation of a robotic multifactorial fall-risk predictive model: A one-year prospective study in community-dwelling older adults.

BackgroundFalls in the elderly are a major public health concern because of their high incidence, the involvement of many risk factors, the considerable post-fall morbidity and mortality, and the health-related and social costs. Given that many falls are preventable, the early identification of older adults at risk of falling is crucial in order to develop tailored interventions to prevent such falls. To date, however, the fall-risk assessment tools currently used in the elderly have not shown sufficiently high predictive validity to distinguish between subjects at high and low fall risk. Consequently, predicting the risk of falling remains an unsolved issue in geriatric medicine. This one-year prospective study aims to develop and validate, by means of a cross-validation method, a multifactorial fall-risk model based on clinical and robotic parameters in older adults.MethodsCommunity-dwelling subjects aged ≥ 65 years were enrolled. At the baseline, all subjects were evaluated for history of falling and number of drugs taken daily, and their gait and balance were evaluated by means of the Timed “Up & Go” test (TUG), Gait Speed (GS), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA). They also underwent robotic assessment by means of the hunova robotic device to evaluate the various components of balance. All subjects were followed up for one-year and the number of falls was recorded. The models that best predicted falls—on the basis of: i) only clinical parameters; ii) only robotic parameters; iii) clinical plus robotic parameters—were identified by means of a cross-validation method.ResultsOf the 100 subjects initially enrolled, 96 (62 females, mean age 77.17±.49 years) completed the follow-up and were included. Within one year, 32 participants (33%) experienced at least one fall (“fallers”), while 64 (67%) did not (“non-fallers”). The best classifier model to emerge from cross-validated fall-risk estimation included eight clinical variables (age, sex, history of falling in the previous 12 months, TUG, Tinetti, SPPB, Low GS, number of drugs) and 20 robotic parameters, and displayed an area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.72–0.90). Notably, the model that included only three of these clinical variables (age, history of falls and low GS) plus the robotic parameters showed similar accuracy (ROC AUC 0.80, 95% CI: 0.71–0.89). In comparison with the best classifier model that comprised only clinical parameters (ROC AUC: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.55–0.79), both models performed better in predicting fall risk, with an estimated Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) of 0.30 and 0.31 (p = 0.02), respectively, and an estimated Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI) of 0.32 and 0.27 (p<0.001), respectively. The best model that comprised only robotic parameters (the 20 parameters identified in the final model) achieved a better performance than the clinical parameters alone, but worse than the combination of both clinical and robotic variables (ROC AUC: 0.73, 95% CI 0.63–0.83).ConclusionA multifactorial fall-risk assessment that includes clinical and hunova robotic variables significantly improves the accuracy of predicting the risk of falling in community-dwelling older people. Our data suggest that combining clinical and robotic assessments can more accurately identify older people at high risk of falls, thereby enabling personalized fall-prevention interventions to be undertaken.