Abstract Background/Introduction The recent inclusion of polypills—fixed-dose combinations of two or more antihypertensive drugs and statin with or without aspirin—in the World Health Organization’s Essential Medicines List (EML) reiterates the potential of this approach to improve global treatment coverage for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Although there exists extensive evidence on efficacy, safety, and acceptability of polypills, there is no research to-date assessing the "real world" availability and affordability of polypills globally. Purpose We conducted a cross-sectional survey of public and private sector facilities in 13 countries from around the world to evaluate the availability and affordability of polypills. Methods In the surveyed countries, we first ascertained whether any polypill was authorized for marketing and/or included in the national EMLs and clinical guidelines. The facility survey employed a modified WHO/Health Action International methodology. In each country, we collected retail and price data for polypills from at least one public sector facility and three private pharmacies using convenience sampling. Polypills were considered unaffordable in a given country if the lowest paid worker spends more than a days’ wage to purchase monthly supply. Results Polypills were approved for marketing in four of the 13 surveyed countries: Spain, India, Mauritius, and Argentina. None of these countries included polypills in national guidelines, formularies, or EMLs. Further, none of the surveyed public pharmacies in any of the four countries stocked any polypills. Among the surveyed private sector facilities, availability ranged from 0% in India (out-of-stock on the survey day but listed for sale) to 100% in Argentina and Spain. In the private sector, we identified seven unique polypill combinations, marketed by eight different companies. Although not in stock, India had a wider range of various combinations (n=5). Many combinations (63%) found in this survey were affordable in the local context, but these were limited to India and Spain. A lowest paid government worker would spend between 0.2 (India)–2.8 (Mauritius) days’ wages to pay the price for one month’s supply of the polypills. Polypills were likely to be affordable in countries that locally manufactured them. Further, two-pill combinations (one antihypertensive and a statin) were stocked by private pharmacies in Argentina, Bangladesh, Cameroon, India, Nepal, and Spain, with affordability ranging from 0.2 (India)–7.1 (Cameroon) days’ wages. Conclusion Low availability and affordability of polypills in both public and private sectors suggest that the implementation and overall uptake of polypills remains poor globally. Context-specific multi-disciplinary health system research is required to understand factors affecting polypill implementation and to design and evaluate appropriate implementation strategies.