Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Program Research Articles

Inpatient Rehabilitation is Effective for Severe Daily Activity Deficits Related to Chronic Low Back Pain.

Chronic low back pain disability (CLBPD) is a syndrome that includes pain, disability, emotional impairments, and social problems. The study was conducted to examine the effect of an inpatient rehabilitation program on the performance of everyday life tasks (daily activities), and report on pain in CLBPD patients with primary activities of daily living (ADL) deficits. In a retrospective cohort study, demographic and clinical data were retrieved from records of inpatients admitted consecutively to the program. Scores of the Spinal Pain Independence Measure (SPIM) and of changes in reported pain levels were used to assess improvement in the performance of daily activities and pain reduction. T-tests were used to assess the significance of score changes. Spearman's correlations and analysis of variance were used to assess relationships of SPIM gain and affecting factors. Ninety-nine patients were included. Daily task performance improved in 71 patients (71.7%). The SPIM score increased from 48.7 (SD 16.3) at admission to the rehabilitation program to 57.8 (SD 12.5) at discharge (P<0.001). The SPIM score at admission negatively affected SPIM gain (P<0.001). The SPIM gain was significant for admission SPIM scores of 50 or lower (P<0.05), but differences in SPIM scores were not as noticeable for patients with admission SPIM scores above 50. Relief in pain was reported in 59 patients (59.6%) and was not associated with function. The multidisciplinary rehabilitation program, which improved function and provided limited pain relief in inpatients with CLBPD primary ADL deficits, can be effective for the most severe CLBPD cases.

Investigating the effects of a daily multidisciplinary intensive outpatient rehabilitation program on innovative biomarkers in people with Parkinson's disease: Study protocol for a phase III randomized controlled clinical trial.

To date, there has been no medication that has prevented the progression of Parkinson's disease (PD). Many benefits of intensive and multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for PD are supported by clinical, epidemiological, and experimental data. The main question is whether high-intensity motor and cognitive exercises have an effect on the disease's biological mechanisms. This study protocol is a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) designed to determine the efficacy of an experimental, intensive, and multidisciplinary treatment in comparison to a home-based self-treatment in improving biomolecular and functional parameters in PD. A total of 72 participants will be randomly allocated to two different groups, experimental (n = 36) and control group (n = 36). The rehabilitation program will last 6 consecutive weeks and will involve the execution of a total of 30 sessions, one for each day of the week from Monday to Friday. Participants allocated to the control group will carry out a home-based self-treatment program that includes muscle-stretching and active mobilization exercises for 40'/day for 6 consecutive weeks. The primary outcome measure is the effects of both treatments on a new set of molecular biomarkers such as oligomeric alpha-synuclein and neurotrophic factors measured in peripheral neural derived extracellular vesicles (NDEVs). Secondary outcomes will include changes of motor and non-motor symptoms, balance and gait performance and cognitive functioning. This RCT has been registered as "Intensive Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation and Biomarkers in Parkinson's Disease" on 30 May, 2022 to ClinicalTrials.gov with the Study ID number: NCT05452655. This rehabilitation program is believed to be crucial in modifying biomolecular and functional parameters in people with PD. We expect that this study will provide additional evidence to understand the impact of an aerobic and intensive rehabilitation program on brain plasticity in patients with PD.

Intensive Multiprofessional Rehabilitation Is Superior to Standard Orthogeriatric Care in Patients with Proximal Femur Fractures-A Matched Pair Study of 9580 Patients from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma (ATR-DGU).

Background: Orthogeriatric treatment, which involves a collaborative approach between orthopedic surgeons and geriatricians, is generally considered to be superior to standard care following hip fractures. The aim of this study was to investigate additional effects of a geriatrician-led multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. Methods: In this matched paired observational cohort study, patients aged 70 years and older with a proximal femur fracture requiring surgery were included. Between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2022 data were recorded from hospital admission to 120-day follow-up in the Registry for Geriatric Trauma (ATR-DGU), a registry of older adults with hip fractures. Out of 60,254 patients, 9580 patients met the inclusion criteria, 4669 patients received early multiprofessional rehabilitation (EMR) and 4911 patients were treated by standard orthogeriatric co-management (OGC). Results: Compared to standard orthogeriatric treatment, multiprofessional therapy significantly lowered the 7-day mortality rate (2.89% vs. 5.11%) and had a significant impact on walking ability seven days after surgery (86.44% vs. 77.78%). Conclusions: In summary, a geriatrician-led multiprofessional rehabilitation program resulted in lower mortality and improved walking ability than standard orthogeriatric care.

Multidisciplinary Home-Based Rehabilitation Program for Individuals With Disabilities: Longitudinal Observational Study.

Disability affects a significant portion of the global population nowadays, necessitating innovative approaches to access rehabilitation processes. Home-based rehabilitation has emerged as a beneficial approach, offering comfort and context-specific therapy. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary home-based rehabilitation program for individuals with moderate neuromusculoskeletal disabilities in terms of motor function and mood. A total of 270 participants with median age of 66 (IQR 20-98) years were recruited from the National Disability Registry of Chile. The intervention involved a multidisciplinary team composed of 49 health care professionals providing personalized treatment plans over 4 months (32 sessions for physical therapy, 8 sessions for occupational therapy, 4 sessions for nutrition, 8 sessions for psychology, and 4 sessions for nursing and podiatry). This program also included 2 medical evaluations (at the beginning and the end) to monitor clinical progress in terms of motor function and mental health, using the Berg Balance Scale and Beck Depression Inventory, respectively. The home-based rehabilitation program showed significant improvements (P<.001) in motor function and balance with a reduction in fall risk. Specifically, the Berg Balance Scale score decreased close to 15% after the home-based rehabilitation program for all enrolled participants. On the other hand, depression levels showed no significant changes (P=.27), with percentages of variation less than 8% between the 2 assessed conditions. In this sense, participants remained with the same mild depression level (14 of 63) concerning the Beck Depression Inventory score. This study concludes that personalized home-based rehabilitation programs are effective in enhancing motor function and balance, particularly in individuals with neurological conditions. On the other hand, the findings in terms of mood advocate for further exploration of psychological support within such programs to enhance overall patient well-being. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06537791; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06537791.

Long-term patient outcomes from a multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation programme with integrated nurse specialist support: A retrospective cohort study

BackgroundCardiac rehabilitation programmes, while demonstrating benefits, face challenges in universal adoption, particularly in New Zealand. This study evaluates the long-term impact of cardiac rehabilitation participation and attendance on survival and readmission rates in the Auckland Health District. ObjectiveTo examine the impact of patient participation in nurse-led lifestyle rehabilitation and physiotherapy exercise rehabilitation on key outcomes, including all-cause mortality, and all-cause, cardiac-specific, and kidney disease readmission rates. DesignRetrospective cohort study. SettingAuckland Health District, New Zealand. Participants3331 patients registered in the Auckland cardiac rehabilitation programme between 2016 and 2020. MethodsData analysis included examining associations between attendance at nurse-led lifestyle and physiotherapy-led exercise sessions and outcomes at 12, 24 months, and 2022 year-end, including all-cause mortality, all-cause readmission, and cardiac-specific readmission rates. Analysis methods included survival analysis, Cox proportional regression, and logistic binary regression, controlling for confounders using propensity score weights and baseline factors. Results1363 (40.9 %) patients attended at least one lifestyle rehabilitation session (average 5.0 ± 2.9 sessions), 1121 (33.7 %) patients attended at least one exercise rehabilitation session (average 6.8 ± 7.4 sessions), and 649 (19.5 %) patients attended at least one lifestyle and one exercise rehabilitation session. Increased likelihood of participation in rehabilitation was explained by ethnicity, while current and historical tobacco use, history of heart failure, receiving an angiogram, PCI, or other treatment such as medical management or implantable devices were associated with lower odds of participation. Participation in rehabilitation (average 7.9 ± 6.1 sessions) was associated with a higher mean survival estimate (7.6 years vs. 6.4 years, p < 0.001) while Cox proportional hazard regression, controlling for baseline factors and propensity score weights showed that a single session of rehabilitation attended had a 2.1 % decreased risk of mortality (hazard ratio = 0.98, 95 % CI: 0.96 to 0.99, p = 0.29). The cumulative hazard ratio for average attendance (7.9 ± 6.1 sessions) was 0.85 (95 % CI: 0.83 to 0.86, p < 0.001) indicating a 15 % decreased risk of mortality during follow-up. 20 % lower kidney disease readmission rates were observed among participants over the next 24 months (p < 0.05). However, no differences in all-cause or cardiac-specific readmission rates were observed. ConclusionsThe study supports the effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation in improving long-term survival for Auckland Health District patients. The positive impact of nurse-led interventions and integrated support throughout the cardiac rehabilitation process highlights the need for translating this model to other health districts in New Zealand to optimise patient care and outcomes.

Pain neuroscience education is not superior to spinal physiology and ergonomics education within a short multidisciplinary rehabilitation program: A randomized controlled trial

IntroductionThere is little evidence to suggest that one educational intervention is superior to another when associated with a rehabilitation program in the management of persistent low back pain. The objective of the present study was to compare pain neuroscience education with spine physiology and ergonomics education as part of a one-week multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. MethodWe conducted a randomized, controlled trial among patients having experienced persistent low back pain for at least 1 year. The patients participated in a one-week multidisciplinary rehabilitation program with an educational component. The members of the experimental and control groups received pain neuroscience education and spine physiology and ergonomics education, respectively. Outcomes were assessed before the program (day 0), immediately afterwards (day 5), and on day 90 after the start of the program. The primary outcome measure was functional disability on day 90. ResultsA total of 88 patients were randomized. On day 90, a statistically significant mean [95% confidence interval] decrease in the level of disability was observed in the experimental (PNE) group (−3.4 [-5.0 to −1.8]). The mean [95%CI] difference versus the control group (−1.7 [-4.0 to 0.5]) was not statistically significant (p = 0.12). There were no statistically significant intergroup differences in the secondary outcome measures. ConclusionThere appears to be no advantage in replacing a conventional, non-neuroscientific educational program (based on spinal physiology and ergonomics) with a pain neuroscience education program as part of a one-week multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. Further research is needed to identify patients who will respond better to a pain neuroscience education module as part of a personalized care program.

Clinical Examination, Diagnosis, and Conservative Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Narrative Review.

Chronic low back pain is one of the most frequent reasons for medical consultation. It is important to make the correct diagnosis to select the most appropriate treatment in a stepwise approach. In this narrative review, we focus on the clinical examination, the diagnosis, and the conservative treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain. Belgian guidelines for low back pain were used as a basis, followed by a snowball search starting from two articles. Besides that, the Cochrane database was consulted using the following research areas: "multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation", "physical examination of lumbar spine", and "rehabilitation back pain". Lastly, we took information from three handbooks. The diagnosis of low back pain starts with a thorough history, including red, yellow, orange, black, and blue flags. Physical, neurological, sensory, and motor testing is performed and complemented with specific tests for low back pain. With a focus on the conservative treatment, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments are possible. For CNSLBP, conservative management is advised, starting with reassurance and clear patient education about the condition. While additional treatments, such as manipulation, massage, and acupuncture, can be considered, their effectiveness is not well supported by evidence. Our center emphasizes exercise within a multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation program, and although evidence for this approach is limited, we have seen positive outcomes, including improved mobility, strength, and higher return-to-work rates, particularly with the David Spine Concept (DSC).

Side-effect expectations are associated with disability, physical fitness, and somatic symptoms 3 months after post-COVID neurological inpatient rehabilitation

IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has led to long-term health issues known as post-COVID-19 condition, including fatigue and cognitive disruptions. Despite its recognition as a public health concern, the efficacy of therapeutic interventions, especially in neurological rehabilitation, remains unclear. This study examines how treatment expectations are associated with psychological and physical outcomes in post-COVID-19 condition neurological rehabilitation. MethodsIn an observational cohort study 61 patients with confirmed post-COVID-19 condition were included. Baseline (T0) data on treatment and side effect expectations were collected, before participants underwent a 4–6 week multidisciplinary rehabilitation program. Primary outcome was illness-related disability (Pain Disability Index). Secondary outcomes included depressive symptoms (PHQ-9), anxiety levels (GAD-7), functional status (PCFS), fatigue (CFS), and physical fitness (6MWT). Regression models analyzed the associations of baseline expectations with outcomes at the end of rehabilitation (T1) and three months post-rehabilitation (T2). ResultsAfter adjusting for multiple testing, higher baseline side-effect expectations were associated with greater illness-related disability (β = 0.42, p = 0.007), reduced physical fitness (β = − 0.24, p = 0.04), and more somatic symptoms (β = 0.33, p = 0.006) at follow-up (T2). Positive treatment expectations were associated with poorer functional status (β = 0.35, p = 0.011) at T2. ConclusionThis study highlights the associations of side-effect expectations with post-COVID-19 condition rehabilitation outcomes. Higher side-effect expectations were associated to poorer outcomes, indicating a nocebo effect. Surprisingly, positive expectations were linked to worse outcomes, possibly due to unrealistic optimism. Managing patient expectations realistically and addressing side-effect concerns seems crucial for optimizing rehabilitation outcomes.

Whole-Body Cryostimulation: An Effective Complementary Treatment in Fibromyalgia? A Follow Up Study.

Recent evidence suggests that whole-body cryostimulation (WBC) may be beneficial for patients with fibromyalgia (FM), but little is known about the duration of such effects. The purpose of this study was to verify the duration of clinical-functional benefits after one cycle of WBC. We conducted a follow-up study on the medium and long-term effects of WBC on well-being, use of pain-relieving/anti-inflammatory medications, pain level, fatigue, sleep quality, and psychological aspects such as mood and anxiety. Twelve months after discharge, we administered a 10 min follow-up telephone interview with FM patients with obesity who had undergone ten 2 min WBC sessions at -110 °C as part of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program (n = 23) and with patients who had undergone rehabilitation alone (n = 23). Both groups reported positive changes after the rehabilitation program, and similar results regarding fatigue, mood, and anxiety scores; however, the implementation of ten sessions of WBC over two weeks produced additional benefits in pain, general well-being status, and sleep quality with beneficial effects lasting 3-4 months. Therefore, our findings suggest that adding WBC to a rehabilitation program could exert stronger positive effects to improve key aspects of FM such as general well-being, pain level, and sleep quality.

The importance of cognitive intervention in acquired traumatic brain injury during 6 months of multidisciplinary rehabilitation: a case description

Planning an immediate and multidisciplinary rehabilitation is crucial to reduce the significant physical, cognitive, and psychosocial impact resulting from head trauma. This study highlights the importance of ongoing cognitive rehabilitation in conjunction with other rehabilitation therapies, such as motor, occupational, and speech therapy, for a 19-year-old woman who suffered an acquired traumatic brain injury in a high-energy vehicle accident. When the patient was admitted to the hospital, their cognitive functioning (LCF) was 4 (confused-agitated state), their Barthel index was 0, their Glasgow coma scale (GCS) was 7, and their disability rating scale (DRS) was 7. The patient’s cognitive functioning improved to LCF 8 (purposeful-appropriate), numerical rating scale: 0/10, Barthel index: 53, GCS:15, and DRS: 5 at the time of discharge from the neurorehabilitation unit. In conclusion, early cognitive intervention in a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program is essential to maximizing the patient’s potential and improving the rehabilitation’s outcome.

The Effects of Multidisciplinary Intensive Rehabilitation on Cognitive and Executive Functions in Parkinson's Disease: A Clinical Database Analysis.

Background/Objectives: This study is based on data collected from a medical health record review to assess whether multidisciplinary intensive rehabilitation treatment in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients can improve global cognitive functioning and executive functions. Methods: The data related to PD patients were extrapolated from a clinical database called "NeuroRehab". A total of 104 PD patients (51 males; 53 females) performed 6 weeks of multidisciplinary intensive rehabilitation treatment in clinical practice from January 2019 to May 2023. This training program was characterized by three daily sessions of 60 min of activities (muscle relaxation and stretching exercises, moderate physical aerobic exercise, and occupational therapy). The patients were classified and stratified according to disease severity (according to the Hoehn and Yahr scale), postural instability and gait difficulty (PIGD) or tremor-dominant (TD) subtypes, disease duration (DD), and the presence of dyskinesias. The effect of multidisciplinary intensive rehabilitation treatment on cognitive and executive functions was evaluated through the administration of cognitive tests, such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB). All the parameters were evaluated at the baseline (T0) and at the end of the rehabilitation program (T1). Results: The multidisciplinary intensive rehabilitation treatment significantly improved cognitive performance. The MMSE, MoCA, and FAB test scores after the rehabilitation program (T1) were significantly higher compared to the scores obtained at the baseline (T0). Moreover, further analyses on subgroups of the patients who scored below the cut-off in the MMSE showed that at least 50% of patients overcame the cut-off score. Interestingly, the same analyses performed for the MoCA and FAB revealed a higher rate of improvement in cognitive functions, with normal scores in both tests after 6 weeks of multidisciplinary intensive rehabilitation treatment. Conclusions: This study revealed the potential effects of a 6-week multidisciplinary rehabilitation program in improving cognitive status in a PD inpatient cohort.

Outcomes of Children With Short Bowel Syndrome: Experiences in a Multidisciplinary Intestinal Rehabilitation Unit Over Two Decades

BackgroundShort bowel syndrome (SBS) is a rare but serious form of organ failure, and patients with SBS depend on total parenteral nutrition (PN) to maintain growth and development. The present study aimed to evaluate the experiences and outcomes of children with SBS managed by a multidisciplinary intestinal rehabilitation programme in a tertiary paediatric centre. MethodsA retrospective single-centre analysis of all paediatric patients with a clinical diagnosis of SBS between 2001 and 2022 was performed. Clinical outcomes and their predictors were extracted and analysed. ResultsOf the 64 children included in the study, 43 (67%) had extensive necrotising enterocolitis. The median bowel length was 45 cm (interquartile range (IQR) = 18–65) and 18.9% (IQR = 10–28.5) of the expected length based on age. Over a mean follow-up period of 8.9 years, 57 patients (89%) survived, and 50 (78%) weaned off PN. The presence of intestinal failure-associated liver disease (IFALD) (OR = 6.375, p = 0.02) and patients managed before the introduction of fish oil-based PN in 2007 (OR = 5.895, p = 0.001) were significant predictors of mortality. There was an overall improvement in survival over time (p = 0.003). Ultrashort bowel length was not associated with significantly higher mortality (OR = 1.1, p = 0.65) but was a poor prognostic factor for weaning off PN (OR = 3.57, p = 0.004). Among all patients who weaned off PN, two had bowel lengthening procedures and one received a glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2) analogue. ConclusionsA multidisciplinary intestinal rehabilitation programme offers a comprehensive approach for patients with SBS and has been shown to be effective with favourable outcomes. Improvements in the choice of PN and the development of new treatment strategies potentially improved the survival and enteral autonomy of SBS patients. Level of EvidenceIII.

Prevention and rehabilitation after heart transplantation: A clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology, Heart Failure Association of the ESC, and the European Cardio Thoracic Transplant Association, a section of ESOT.

Little is known either about either physical activity patterns, or other lifestyle-related prevention measures in heart transplantation (HTx) recipients. The history of HTx started more than 50 years ago but there are still no guidelines or position papers highlighting the features of prevention and rehabilitation after HTx. The aims of this scientific statement are (i) to explain the importance of prevention and rehabilitation after HTx, and (ii) to promote the factors (modifiable/non-modifiable) that should be addressed after HTx to improve patients' physical capacity, quality of life and survival. All HTx team members have their role to play in the care of these patients and multidisciplinary prevention and rehabilitation programmes designed for transplant recipients. HTx recipients are clearly not healthy disease-free subjects yet they also significantly differ from heart failure patients or those who are supported with mechanical circulatory support. Therefore, prevention and rehabilitation after HTx both need to be specifically tailored to this patient population and be multidisciplinary in nature. Prevention and rehabilitation programmes should be initiated early after HTx and continued during the entire post-transplant journey. This clinical consensus statement focuses on the importance and the characteristics of prevention and rehabilitation designed for HTx recipients.

Prevention and Rehabilitation After Heart Transplantation: A Clinical Consensus Statement of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology, Heart Failure Association of the ESC, and the European Cardio Thoracic Transplant Association, a Section of ESOT.

Little is known either about either physical activity patterns, or other lifestyle-related prevention measures in heart transplantation (HTx) recipients. The history of HTx started more than 50 years ago but there are still no guidelines or position papers highlighting the features of prevention and rehabilitation after HTx. The aims of this scientific statement are (i) to explain the importance of prevention and rehabilitation after HTx, and (ii) to promote the factors (modifiable/non-modifiable) that should be addressed after HTx to improve patients' physical capacity, quality of life and survival. All HTx team members have their role to play in the care of these patients and multidisciplinary prevention and rehabilitation programmes designed for transplant recipients. HTx recipients are clearly not healthy disease-free subjects yet they also significantly differ from heart failure patients or those who are supported with mechanical circulatory support. Therefore, prevention and rehabilitation after HTx both need to be specifically tailored to this patient population and be multidisciplinary in nature. Prevention and rehabilitation programmes should be initiated early after HTx and continued during the entire post-transplant journey. This clinical consensus statement focuses on the importance and the characteristics of prevention and rehabilitation designed for HTx recipients.

Prevention and rehabilitation after heart transplantation: A clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology, Heart Failure Association of the ESC, and the European Cardio Thoracic Transplant Association, a section of ESOT.

Little is known either about either physical activity patterns, or other lifestyle-related prevention measures in heart transplantation (HTx) recipients. The history of HTx started more than 50 years ago but there are still no guidelines or position papers highlighting the features of prevention and rehabilitation after HTx. The aims of this scientific statement are (i) to explain the importance of prevention and rehabilitation after HTx, and (ii) to promote the factors (modifiable/non-modifiable) that should be addressed after HTx to improve patients' physical capacity, quality of life and survival. All HTx team members have their role to play in the care of these patients and multidisciplinary prevention and rehabilitation programmes designed for transplant recipients. HTx recipients are clearly not healthy disease-free subjects yet they also significantly differ from heart failure patients or those who are supported with mechanical circulatory support. Therefore, prevention and rehabilitation after HTx both need to be specifically tailored to this patient population and be multidisciplinary in nature. Prevention and rehabilitation programmes should be initiated early after HTx and continued during the entire post-transplant journey. This clinical consensus.

Quality of Life in Patients with Obesity: The Role of Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Medicine

Background: Little is known about the role of rehabilitation medicine in obesity. Objective: to examine the benefits of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program on the quality of life in patients with severe obesity. Methodology: We included 124 patients with obesity (mean age: 57 years; BMI ≥30), in an 8-week in-hospital multidisciplinary supervised program combining physiotherapy, nutrition and psychological support. Clinical, bio-psychological and functional parameters, as well as an obesity-specific quality-of-life score, were acquired at 0 and 8 weeks. Results: The quality-of-life score improved significantly at 8 weeks, from 60.8 to 68.8 (p &lt; 0.0001), and was positively correlated with cardio-respiratory function (r = 0.47; p &lt; 0.0001). Conclusions: Our results highlight the important role of multidisciplinary rehabilitation medicine and its integrated approach to improve the quality of life of people with obesity.

The Role of Art Therapy in Enhancing Rehabilitation Outcomes for Athletes with Sports Injuries

Purpose: This study sought to analyze the role of art therapy in enhancing rehabilitation outcomes for athletes with sports injuries. Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the role of art therapy in enhancing rehabilitation outcomes for athletes with sports injuries. Preliminary empirical review revealed that art therapy offers significant benefits for athletes recovering from sports injuries. Through a review of empirical studies, it was found that art therapy facilitated emotional expression, coping skills development, and social support, leading to improved psychological well-being and holistic healing. The study emphasized the importance of addressing the biopsychosocial aspects of rehabilitation and highlighted the need for further research to understand the mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of art therapy. Overall, the findings underscored the transformative potential of art therapy in optimizing rehabilitation outcomes for athletes with sports injuries. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Biopsychosocial Model of Health, Self- Determination theory (SDT) and Transactional Model of Stress and Coping may be used to anchor future studies on rehabilitation for athletes with sports injuries. The study provided several recommendations contributing to theory, practice, and policy in sports injury rehabilitation. It suggested further exploration of theoretical frameworks to understand art therapy's therapeutic mechanisms and its integration into existing models. In practice, it recommended incorporating art therapy into multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs, along with developing evidence-based guidelines for its implementation. Additionally, the study advocated for policy initiatives to increase access to art therapy services for athletes, emphasizing collaboration among stakeholders and interdisciplinary knowledge sharing. These recommendations aimed to promote holistic approaches to rehabilitation, improve outcomes, and enhance the overall well-being of injured athletes.

Effectiveness of a pain neuroscience education programme on the physical activity of patients with chronic low back pain compared with a standard back school programme: protocol for a randomised controlled study (END-LC)

IntroductionEducation is recognised as an effective and necessary approach in chronic low back pain. Nevertheless, data regarding the effectiveness of education in promoting physical activity in the medium term or...

Post-recovery experience among COVID-19 patients: A population-based online survey in India.

Patients who recovered from the acute phase of COVID-19 experience several post-COVID-19 health and social problems. This study was therefore done to explore the living experiences and the various health problems experienced by people and their determinants during the post-recovery phase of COVID-19. This cross-sectional study was conducted in Mangalore in March 2022. Data were collected using a semi-structured questionnaire designed as a Google Doc. Post-COVID-19 conditions were defined as adverse health consequences returning, new, or persistent beyond 1 month after SARS-CoV-2 infection. The experiences in the post-recovery phase of COVID-19 were assessed based on a scoring system for the related items in the questionnaire. Out of 235 participants, 204 (86.8%) reported post-COVID-19 health problems between 1 and 6 months following SARS-CoV-2 infection. The majority of them reported fatigue [114 (55.9%)]. Self-perceived health status and social relationships were significantly poorer among participants in the post-COVID-19 phase than before infection. In the multivariable analysis, unmarried/divorced/widow status, staying within city limits, and history of being admitted to the hospital due to various COVID-19-related emergencies were independently associated with the presence of post-COVID-19 conditions among the participants. The living experience in the post-recovery phase was positive only among 22 (9.4%) participants and was found to be significantly associated with the severe status of COVID-19 at the time of disease presentation. Post-COVID-19 health problems were present among several participants. Those identified to be at risk of developing these conditions need to be periodically screened and managed with a multi-disciplinary care and rehabilitation program. There is also a need to address social problems and encourage positive living experiences among COVID-19 patients during the post-recovery phase of the disease.

New horizons in comprehensive rehabilitation of patients with melanoma: improved outcomes through an integrated approach to immunotherapy

Abstract. The article discusses issues of a comprehensive rehabilitation approach for patients with melanoma when treated with immunotherapy. By focusing on innovative treatments, the study highlights the need to integrate nutritional support, physical therapy, magnetic therapy and psychological support to improve quality of life and enhance the effectiveness of immunotherapy regimens. Purpose. The study aims to evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program on improving physiological functions, psychoemotional well-being and the impact on the overall antitumor response, which together can improve the quality of life of patients with melanoma. Materials and methods. The study included 135 patients diagnosed with melanoma who received a course of immunotherapy. In the study group (the main group), a complex of rehabilitation techniques was used (magnetic therapy, physical therapy, nutritional support, psychological support), while in the control group, patients did not undergo an accompanying comprehensive rehabilitation program. Treatment effectiveness was assessed in accordance with iRECIST 1.1 criteria. To assess the quality of life, the Russian version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was used. The severity of adverse events was assessed according to CTCAE 5.0 criteria. Results. Patients from the main group who received comprehensive rehabilitation support along with immunotherapy showed an improvement in their general physical condition and a decrease in the intensity of some side effects of treatment. Patients in the control group who received only standard immunotherapy also showed changes in their health status, but these changes were less pronounced compared to the main group. Adverse events during treatment occurred in 55 % of patients in the main group and in 74 % in the control group. Patients in the main group noted an improvement in quality of life by 25 %, while in patients in the control group this figure was 12 %. An 18 % improvement in general condition was noted by patients in the main group, while patients in the control group noted an 8 % improvement in general condition. Conclusion. Implementation of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation approach, including nutritional support, physical therapy exercises, magnetic therapy, and psychological support, demonstrates significant improvements in symptom management and quality of life in melanoma patients undergoing immunotherapy.