Multidisciplinary Community Mental Health Teams Research Articles

Global Advancement in Pharmacy Services for Mental Health: A Review for Evidence-Based Practices.

The symptoms of psychiatric infirmities have variability, and selected drug regimens for mental illness are comparatively complex and individualized; therefore, pharmacy services vary with respect to patients, diseases, healthcare settings, community structures, and countries. Clinical pharmacy services for mental health (MH) are continuously being upgraded. A structured search of the literature was performed in the Cochrane, PubMed (Medline), PsycINFO, Google scholar, Scopus, Science Direct, and Springer Links databases. The title and abstract of each retrieved article were evaluated for relevance. To remove uncertainty and ambiguity, the full-text articles were retrieved and examined for relevance. The articles were further assessed on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Narrative synthesis was performed, creating new categories and relevant subcategories and further subsections. The articles and the results were assessed for quality and bias. Pharmacists have a range of expertise in psychiatric care. The services can be classified as conventional, extended, and advanced pharmacy services. Conventional services include the quality use of medicines in healthcare settings and medication support services in communities that ensure medication adherence. Pharmacists perform extended roles in collaborative medication therapy management, multidisciplinary community mental health teams, collaborative care, patient education, home medication review, hospital-to-home transit, and screening services. In the USA, the role of pharmacists was advanced by prescribing as collaborative and interim prescribers. Australia launched an accredited program for psychiatric first-aid pharmacists. Pharmacists can provide mental care to rural populations using health technology. The role of pharmacists in MH is appreciated either independently or as a team member. Patients and healthcare providers rank the services of pharmacists in MH highly. Still, there is a margin for improvement in the training of pharmacists. Pharmacists cannot provide sufficient time to their patients. Public awareness about the role of pharmacists in MH needs more attention. Moreover, the training of psychiatric pharmacists should be standardized around the world.

Coercion rates in different mental health care models: flexible assertive community treatment vs care as usual

IntroductionIn 2018, within the Horizon 2020 program, RECOVER-E project activities were initiated in Montenegro. During the years 2019 and 2020 Community mental health team (CMHT) within the Special Psychiatric Hospital Kotor was established. This team became responsible for management of treatment of a group of users with severe mental health illnesses, based on the principles of „Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT – A Dutch model).ObjectivesThe main objective of this research was to establish whether there were substantial differences regarding the use of seclusions, restraints and forced medication during the hospital readmissions in the group of patients treated by the CMHT, compared to usual mental health care in Montenegro.MethodsA sample of 202 users of mental health services from Kotor and surrounding municipalities were recruited. Patients were randomized into two similar-sized groups - intervention group, whose treatment was managed by the multidisciplinary CMHT, and control group where treatment as usual was continued (outpatient treatment without field work and hospital readmissions during the psychotic relapses).To estimate and follow-up the frequency of application of coercive measures in this research, hospital documentation was used.ResultsPatients in the intervention group had statistically significant less coercive intervention (such are mechanical restraining, seclusions, isolations and forced medication) during the study. There were no significant differences in the number of hospital days and readmission rates.ConclusionsThis study showed that CMHT care could reduce some of the coercive measures during the treatment of severe mental illnesses.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared

Coercion rates in different mental health care models: flexible assertive community treatment vs care as usual

Abstract: IntroductionIn 2018, within the Horizon 2020 program, RECOVER-E project activities were initiated in Montenegro. During the years 2019 and 2020 Community mental health team (CMHT) within the Special Psychiatric Hospital Kotor was established. This team became responsible for management of treatment of a group of users with severe mental health illnesses, based on the principles of „Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT – A Dutch model). Objectives: The main objective of this research was to establish whether there were substantial differences regarding the use of seclusions, restraints and forced medication during the hospital readmissions in the group of patients treated by the CMHT, compared to usual mental health care in Montenegro.MethodsA sample of 202 users of mental health services from Kotor and surrounding municipalities were recruited. Patients were randomized into two similar-sized groups - intervention group, whose treatment was managed by the multidisciplinary CMHT, and control group where treatment as usual was continued (outpatient treatment without field work and hospital readmissions during the psychotic relapses).To estimate and follow-up the frequency of application of coercive measures in this research, hospital documentation was used.ResultsPatients in the intervention group had statistically significant less coercive intervention (such are mechanical restraining, seclusions, isolations and forced medication) during the study. There were no significant differences in the number of hospital days and readmission rates.ConclusionsThis study showed that CMHT care could reduce some of the coercive measures during the treatment of severe mental illnesses.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared

Hospital readmissions in the group of users on the Flexible Assertive Community Treatment – experiences from RECOVER E Montenegro samples

IntroductionAs a part of Horizon 2020 program, RECOVER-E project activities were initiated in Montenegro in 2018. The initial step involved a thorough situation analysis of the setting and circumstances of treatment of users with severe mental health illnesses, followed by the establishment of the community mental health team (CMHT) within the Special Psychiatric Hospital Kotor. The CMHT became responsible for the treatment of a group of clients with severe mental health illnesses, based on the principles of „Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT – A Dutch model).ObjectivesThe main objective of this research was to establish whether there were substantial differences regarding the hospital readmissions in the group of patients treated by the CMHT, compared to usual mental health care in Montenegro.MethodsWithin the RECOVER-E project, a sample of 202 patients, users of mental health services, were recruited in Montenegro. Patients were randomized into two similar-sized groups - intervention group, whose treatment was managed by the multidisciplinary CMHT, and control group where treatment as usual was continued. To estimate and follow-up the frequency of hospital readmissions, medical documentation was used.ResultsPatients in the intervention group had less hospital days during the 18 months follow-up period. However, the differences between two groups regarding number of readmissions, and total length of hospital days were not statistically significant measured by independent T test.ConclusionsThis study showed that CMHT care could reduce the total length of hospital days during the treatment of psychotic disorders even dough during the COVID 19 pandemic and lock down measuresDisclosureNo significant relationships.

Experiences of healthcare staff providing community-based mental healthcare as a multidisciplinary community mental health team in Central and Eastern Europe findings from the RECOVER-E project: an observational intervention study

BackgroundCommunity Mental Health Teams (CMHTs) deliver healthcare that supports the recovery of people with mental illness. The aim of this paper was to explore to what extent team members of five CMHTs newly implemented in five countries perceived that they had introduced aspects of the recovery-oriented, strength-based approach into care after a training week on recovery-oriented practice. In addition, it evaluated what the team members’ perceptions on their care roles and their level of confidence with this role were.MethodAn observational intervention study using a quantitative survey that was administered among 52 health professionals (21 Nurses, 13 Psychiatrists, 9 Psychologists, 8 Social Workers) and 14 peer workers including the Recovery Self-Assessment Tool Provider Version (RSA-P), the Team Member Self-Assessment Tool (TMSA), and demographic questions was conducted. The measures were self-reported. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate the means and standard deviations for continuous variables and frequencies and percentages for categorical variables (TMSA tool and demographic data). The standard technique to calculate scale scores for each subscale of the RSA-P was used. Bivariate linear regression analyses were applied to explore the impact of predictors on the subscales of the RSA-P. Predictors with significant effects were included in multiple regression models.ResultThe RSA-P showed that all teams had the perception that they provide recovery–oriented practice to a moderately high degree after a training week on recovery-oriented care (mean scores between 3.85–4.46). Health professionals with fewer years of professional experience perceived more frequently that they operated in a recovery-oriented way (p = 0.036, B = − 0.268). Nurses and peer workers did not feel confident or responsible to fulfil specific roles.ConclusionThe findings suggest that a one-week training session on community-based practices and collaborative teamwork may enhance recovery-oriented practice, but the role of nurses and peer workers needs further attention.Trial registrationEach trial was registered before participant enrolment in the clinicaltrials.gov database: Croatia, Zagreb (Trial Reg. No. NCT03862209); Montenegro, Kotor (Trial Reg. No. NCT03837340); Romania, Suceava (Trial Reg. No. NCT03884933); Macedonia, Skopje (Trial Reg. No. NCT03892473); Bulgaria, Sofia (Trial Reg. No. NCT03922425).

Coercion rates in different mental health care models: Experiences from RECOVER-E project samples in Montenegro

In 2018, RECOVER-E project activities were initiated in Montenegro, within the Horizon 2020 program. After conducting a thorough situation analysis of the setting and circumstances of treatment of patients with severe mental illnesses, the community mental health team (CMHT) within the Special Psychiatric Hospital Kotor was established. This team became responsible for the management of treatment of a group of users with severe mental health illnesses, based on the principles of "Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT - A Dutch model). The main objective of this research was to establish whether there were substantial differences regarding the use of coercive measures during the hospital readmissions in the group of patients treated by the CMHT, compared to usual mental health care in Montenegro. Materials and methods: A sample of 202 users of mental health services from Kotor and surrounding municipalities were recruited. Patients were randomized into two similar-sized groups - the intervention group, whose treatment was managed by the multidisciplinary CMHT, and the control group where treatment, as usual, was continued. To estimate and follow up the frequency of application of coercive measures, hospital documentation was used. Mac Arthur Admission Experience Survey has been used after completion of the study to explore the individual levels of perceived coercion during hospital readmissions. Results: Patients in the intervention group had statistically significant less coercive intervention (such are mechanical restraining and forced medication) during the study. There were no other significant differences between the two groups regarding the total number of readmissions, and the length of hospital treatment. Conclusion: This study showed that CMHT care could reduce some of the coercive measures during the treatment of severe mental illnesses, which can lead to the increased perceived quality of care and better treatment adherence.

Sustainability of Community-Based Specialized Mental Health Services in Five European Countries: Protocol for Five Randomized Controlled Trial-Based Health-Economic Evaluations Embedded in the RECOVER-E Program.

BackgroundCommunity-based recovery-oriented mental health services for people with severe mental disorders have not been fully implemented in Bulgaria, Croatia, Macedonia, Montenegro, and Romania. The RECOVER-E project facilitates the implementation of specialized mental health care delivered by setting up services, implementing the services, and evaluating multidisciplinary community mental health teams. The outcomes of the RECOVER-E project are assessed in a trial-based outcome evaluation in each of the participating countries with a health-economic evaluation linked to these trials.ObjectiveThe aim of this protocol paper is to describe the methodology that will be used for the health-economic evaluation alongside the trials.MethodsImplementation sites have been selected in each of the five countries where hospital-based mental health services are available (care as usual [CAU]) for patients with severe mental disorders (severe depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and other psychotic disorders). The newly implemented health care system will involve community-based recovery-oriented mental health care (CMHC). At each site, 180 consenting patients will be randomized to either CAU or CMHC. Patient-level outcomes are personal and social functioning and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Data on participants’ health care use will be collected and corresponding health care costs will be computed. This enables evaluation of health care costs of CMHC as compared with CAU, and these costs can be related to patient-level outcomes (functioning and QALY gains) in health-economic evaluation.ResultsData collection was started in December 2018 (Croatia), February 2019 (Montenegro), April 2019 (Romania), June 2019 (North Macedonia), and October 2019 (Bulgaria). The findings of the outcome evaluations will be reported for each of the five countries separately, and the five trials will be pooled for multilevel analysis on a combined dataset.ConclusionsThe results of the health-economic evaluation of the RECOVER-E project will contribute to the growing evidence base on the health and economic benefits of recovery-oriented and community-based service models for health systems in transition.Trial Registration(1) ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03922425 (Bulgaria); https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03922425 (2) ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03862209 (Croatia); https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03862209 (3) ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03892473 (Macedonia); https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03892473 (4) ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03837340 (Montenegro); https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03837340 (5) ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03884933 (Romania); https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03884933International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)DERR1-10.2196/17454

Towards community-based and recovery-oriented care for severe mental disorders in Southern and Eastern Europe: aims and design of a multi-country implementation and evaluation study (RECOVER-E)

BackgroundSubstantial strides have been made around the world in reforming mental health systems by shifting away from institutional care towards community-based services. Despite an extensive evidence base on what constitutes effective care for people with severe mental ill-health, many people in Europe do not have access to optimal mental health care. In an effort to consolidate previous efforts to improve community mental health care and support the complex transition from hospital-based to community-based care delivery, the RECOVER-E (LaRge-scalE implementation of COmmunity based mental health care for people with seVere and Enduring mental ill health in EuRopE) project aims to implement and evaluate multidisciplinary community mental health teams in five countries in Central and Eastern Europe. This paper provides a brief overview of the RECOVER-E project and its methods.MethodsFive implementation sites were selected (Sofia, Bulgaria; Zagreb, Croatia; Skopje, North Macedonia; Kotor, Montenegro; Siret-Suceava, Romania) where hospital-based mental health services are available (care as usual, CAU) for patients with severe mental disorders (severe depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia). The intervention consists of the introduction of a new service delivery model in each site, consisting of community-based recovery-oriented care delivered by trained multidisciplinary community mental health teams (including a peer worker with lived experience of a severe mental disorder). The implementation outcomes of the teams and the effect of the team’s approach on patient and service utilisation outcomes will be evaluated using a mix of research methods. The study includes five planned hybrid implementation-effectiveness trials (1 per site) with patient-level randomization (n = 180, with patients randomised to either care as usual or intervention condition). Effectiveness is evaluated using a pragmatic non-blinded design with patients randomised into two parallel groups: receiving new community-based care or receiving usual care in the form of institutional, hospital-based mental health care. Trial-based health economic evaluation will be conducted; implementation outcomes will be evaluated, with data aligned with dimensions from the RE-AIM framework. Pathways to sustaining project results will be developed through policy dialogue sessions, which will be carried out in each country and through ongoing policy engagement activities at the European level.DiscussionThe RECOVER-E project has been developed and conducted to demonstrate the impact of implementing an evidence-based service delivery model for people with severe mental illness in different contexts in middle-income countries in Central and Eastern Europe. It is expected that the results will contribute to the growing evidence-base on the health and economic benefits of recovery-oriented and community-based service models for health systems in transition.Trial registration Each trial was registered before participant enrolment in the clinicaltrials.gov database: Site—Croatia, Zagreb (Trial Reg. No. NCT03862209); Montenegro, Kotor (Trial Reg. No. NCT03837340); Romania, Suceava (Trial Reg. No. NCT03884933); Macedonia, Skopje (Trial Reg. No. NCT03892473); Bulgaria, Sofia (Trial Reg. No. NCT03922425)

Support Workers in Community Mental Health Teams for Older People: Exploring Sources of Satisfaction and Stress

Context: Support workers play an essential role in multidisciplinary community mental health teams for older people (CMHTsOP) in England. However, little is known about how they perceive their role or the impact this has on their levels of stress, wellbeing and job satisfaction. Objectives: To compare CMHTsOP support workers’ perceptions of the psychosocial characteristics of their work with those of registered CMHTsOP practitioners. Methods: A postal survey of CMHTsOP staff in nine mental health trusts. Information was collected about job demands, controls and support using the Job Content Questionnaire. Additional data was collected on other psychosocial features of CMHTsOP working using job satisfaction and intention-to-quit measures and a set of bespoke statements which were supplemented by a subset from the Occupational Stress Indicator. Findings: Responses were received from 43 support workers and 166 registered practitioners. Support workers reported significantly lower job demands and better co-worker support than registered practitioners. They were also significantly more satisfied with their jobs and more likely to believe that their skills and strengths were used appropriately. The majority of both groups were positive about their team’s climate and their value and identity within it. Limitations: Although the study explored the psychosocial characteristics of work that contribute to wellbeing, it did not directly measure stress. Implications: Given the growing number of CMHTsOP support workers and their diverse roles, future research might usefully explore the specific tasks which contribute most to individual satisfaction and wellbeing.

The Development of a Programme of Mental Health Services for People with Intellectual Disability in Ireland

Introduction: Within the current mental health policy in Ireland, Vision for Change (HSE, 2006), people with intellectual disabilities (I.D.) (target population) should have access to high quality mental health services, including an I.D. specific multi-disciplinary community mental health team. Historically mental health services for this population were poorly developed, without a clear policy or implementation strategy. Services that did exist were often embedded within social care services, with unclear pathways and models of care. Resources are being allocated to Mental Health of Intellectual Disability (MHID) services on an ongoing basis. Therefore the requirement to develop a clear strategy of implementing Vision for Change (HSE, 2006) for MHID was clear. Aim: To develop a clear programme of development of MHID services for children and adults, for full national implementation across mental health and social care services (key stakeholders). The timeline for the programme is 2 years beginning July 2016. The programme involves a number of key stages including: Scoping and mapping of existing resources Defining a clear pathway to care Developing clear governance arrangements Developing clinical activity metrics Key initial results from this programme will be presented including key service mapping data, as well as planned governance and care pathway arrangements. As this is a national programme, it is envisaged that there will be full be transferability of services achieved through collaboration and partnership across the relevant key divisions, organisations, disciplines and with Service Users and their families. Given the inclusive nature of the design of the programme, it’s sustainability potential is strong Developing a complex programme of service development involving existing and new resources across different service divisions requires services to be planned in an integrated manner. The intended impact of this programme is to improve the quality of mental health care and service experience.

Mental Healthcare Delivery in Rural Greece: A 10-year Account of a Mobile Mental Health Unit.

Introduction:Patients living in rural and remote areas may have limited access to mental healthcare due to lack of facilities and socioeconomic reasons, and this is the case of rural areas in Eastern Europe countries. In Greece, community mental health service delivery in rural areas has been implemented through the development of the Mobile Mental Health Units (MMHUs).Methods:We present a 10-year account of the operation of the MMHU of the prefectures of Ioannina and Thesprotia (MMHU I-T) and report on the impact of the service on mental health delivery in the catchment area. The MMHU I-T is a multidisciplinary community mental health team which delivers services in rural and mountainous areas of Northwest Greece.Results:The MMHU I-T has become an integral part of the local primary care system and is well known to the population of the catchment area. By the end of 2016, the majority of patients (60%) were self-referred or family-referred, compared to 24% in the first 2 years. Currently, the number of active patients is 293 (mean age 63 years, 49.5% are older adults), and the mean caseload for each member of the team is 36.6. A significant proportion of patients (28%) receive care with regular domiciliary visits, and the provision of home-based care was correlated with the age of the patients. Within the first 2 years of operation of the MMHU I-T hospitalizations of treatment, engaged patients were reduced significantly by 30.4%, whereas the treatment engagement rates of patients with psychotic disorders were 67.2% in 5 years.Conclusions:The MMHU I-T and other similar units in Greece are a successful paradigm of a low-cost service which promotes mental health in rural, remote, and deprived areas. This model of care may be informative for clinical practice and health policy given the ongoing recession and health budget cuts. It suggests that rural mental healthcare may be effectively delivered by integrating generic community mental health mobile teams into the primary care system.

The replacement of assertive outreach services by reinforcing local community teams: a four-year observational study

Background: The introduction of specialist Assertive Outreach (AO) teams has produced only modest differential findings from English studies compared to standard care. Providers have gradually closed AO services over the last 8 years. We previously studied outcomes at 12 months following the dismantling of two AO teams in London. We now report on the longer term outcomes for these patients.Aims: To evaluate the longer term outcomes, activity and costs for patients receiving a less intensive service.Methods: Observational service level evaluation of 112 patients comparing baseline of AO care with each year of routine care subsequent to the team closure.Results: Patients transferred to standard teams reinforced with the Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) approach had significantly fewer admissions and bed days at each of the four subsequent years compared to baseline, offset by a significant rise in missed face-to-face appointments. There was no significant change in the use of crisis services. Predictably patients had significantly fewer contacts under standard care.Conclusions: AO patients are remarkably resilient to substantial reductions in the intensity of care. Reinforcing multi-disciplinary community mental health teams (CMHTs) with FACT appears to provide an integrated service that is clinically effective and an affordable alternative to orthodox AO teams.

Supported accommodation for people with mental health problems.

Supported accommodation for people with mental health problems.

The role of community nursing in providing integrated care for older people with alcohol misuse

Alcohol misuse in older people is a growing problem for health and social care providers, but remains largely hidden from public view and therefore largely overlooked by commissioners. Many older people with alcohol misuse have a 'dual diagnosis' (alcohol misuse accompanying other mental disorders) rather than alcohol misuse alone, which requires specialist nursing expertise. Over the past 10 years, assessment of and interventions for the detection of alcohol misuse in older people have been developed within one London borough. This article details the background, strategy and outcomes of this service, which provides integrated care in a multi-disciplinary community mental health team covering an inner-city area with a high prevalence of alcohol misuse and dual diagnosis in older people.

Rethinking Filicide

Rethinking Filicide

What happens when life limits our ability to be a psychologist?

This article discusses how grief influenced my ‘self’, and how the similar feelings of a trainee helped me to think about my own difficulties in working in a multidisciplinary Community Mental Health Team with people with traumatic histories and long-term emotional difficulties.

Child Protection and Mental Health

Child Protection and Mental Health

Championing the interface between mental health and child protection: evaluation of a service initiative to improve joint working in northern Ireland

The importance of establishing effective inter‐agency working between adult mental health services and child care services in order to safeguard children has been repeatedly identified by research, policy, inquiries and inspection reports. This article reports on the evaluation of an initiative in one health and social care trust in Northern Ireland that aimed to facilitate joint working and so improve service provision and protection for children and families. The Champions Initiative involved identifying a Champion in each multidisciplinary community mental health team and in each family and child care team that would have responsibility for providing information, promoting joint working and identifying any obstacles to better cooperation. The evaluation of this Initiative assessed levels of experience, training, confidence, understanding and awareness in the Champions and their team members at baseline. The Champions and their Team Leaders were then followed up after six months to obtain their qualitative views of the impact of the initiative. The results include comparisons between mental health and child care staff, and crucially, views about whether the initiative has had any impact on working together. This study also generated recommendations for further service development in this complex and important area of practice. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.‘Identifying a Champion in each multidisciplinary community mental health team and in each family and child care team’

Primary care mental health - A new direction?

Current health policy in Ireland, as articulated in the HSE’s Transformation Programme (2007-2010), has a focus on the health and wellbeing of the whole population and demands a shift from the hospital system to the primary care setting as the central locus of service delivery.1 The main vehicle for this change is the Primary Care Strategy (2001) which recommended the establishment across the country of primary care multidisciplinary teams (PCTs) supported by specialist services in primary care networks (PCNs).2 The Primary Care Strategy and Transformation Programme documents both emphasise that successful implementation depends on close liaison and integration between PCTs and networks and secondary care services so that the patient journey from one service to the next is “seamless and delay free”.1 Consistent with the broad thrust of the national health strategy, the Vision for Change (2006) policy framework for mental health services makes the ambitious statement that it is not enough for a comprehensive mental health policy to make recommendations relating solely to specialist mental health services – it must also deliver mental health activities capable of improving the wellbeing of the population as a whole.3 However, while Vision for Change recommends that links between specialist mental health and primary care services should be enhanced and formalised, most of its recommendations relate specifically to specialist mental health service provision. It envisaged that multidisciplinary community mental health teams (CMHTs) occupy community mental health centres in proximity to other community services, but did not go as far as to recommend the actual co-location of CMHTs and PCTs. In a significant recent development, the HSE has now committed to the provision of physical space to accommodate community mental health teams (CMHTs) and day hospital services within all primary care health centres as the Primary Care Strategy is rolled out nationally. This decision represents a potential milestone in the evolution of mental health service delivery. It presents particular challenges to the historic relationship between primary care and specialist mental health services both of which have been relatively underdeveloped in Ireland, have evolved separately and between which deficiencies in communication and collaboration have been reported by service users and providers alike.4,5 While the health strategy documents describe overall structures designed to increase primary care capacity and improve integration between primary care and secondary care services, other than the inclusion of a clinical psychologist in the envisaged networks, no detailed working arrangements are described. The Vision for Change document identifies the need to build mental healthcare capacity within primary care through enhanced primary care mental health resources, as well as through education and training initiatives, and it recommends the consultation-liaison model in order to achieve greater integration with specialist mental health services. However, at present there is no specific guidance available to either the newly formed PCTs or to existing mental health services in how to pursue these goals. In a worsening economic climate both services can be seen as entering unknown territory without a road-map and both services may have an understandable anxiety as to whether the goal of improved mental health for the population as a whole can be delivered without compromising the quality of service provided to society’s most vulnerable individuals.6

'Recovery' - towards integration into an Irish community mental health team.

We aimed to further our understanding of the concept of recovery by analysing comments made in small group discussions that occurred on a planning Away Day held by a community mental health team along-side service users and carers, which had recovery as its theme. The purpose of this was to reshape the structure and workings of the team. Five small groups, of approximately 10 individuals each, comprised of service-users, carers, representatives from voluntary organisations and mental health professionals were asked to discuss three questions related to Recovery. The commentary reflected previous qualitative research on the philosophy of recovery. Issues that were raised included defining wellness as independent to illness, constructive risk taking, the importance of social factors, medication issues and the importance of self-management and optimism. The comments subsequently went on to shape community mental health team service delivery. Discussion and reflection between mental health professionals, service users and carers can lead to a change in attitude and practice in a well-resourced, fully multi-disciplinary community mental health team, within which both the biological and non-biological aspects of mental illness are accepted. The result has been an introduction of service changes which have helped develop a team that is more accessible and increasingly collaborative.