Multidisciplinary Cardiac Rehabilitation Research Articles

Cardiac rehabilitation after acute coronary syndrome

Cardiac rehabilitation is a fundamental part of treatment after acute coronary syndrome and should be followed within the first 14 days of the acute inpatient stay. The prognostic value in terms of improving quality of life, reducing both re-hospitalizations and cardiovascular mortality has been shown in numerous studies in recent years. The multimodal, interdisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation aims to maintain and restore the patients' ability to cope with everyday life. The characteristic of cardiac rehabilitation is the combination of sports and physiotherapy, psychosocial care, nutritional therapy, medical diagnostics, and therapy adjustment as well as aftercare recommendations within the framework of a 3-4 week stay in specialized rehabilitation facilities. Participation in exercise-based, multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation after acute coronary syndrome reduces cardiovascular mortality and is recommended with Class I, Level A evidence.

Psychological Distress Affects Performance during Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation.

It is known that psychosocial distress affects the morbidity and mortality of patients with cardiovascular disease of every age. The aim of this study was to produce novel information on how psychological distress can influence cardiovascular performance in patients after cardiac surgery undergoing multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation. Patients (n = 57) admitted after cardiac surgery for valvular or coronary disease underwent, within 5 days of admission, the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R) self-report questionnaire to measure psychiatric symptoms and the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) to assess the level of psychological distress. The Positive Symptom Distress Index (PSDI) was measured to indicate the amplitude of symptom distress. Cardiovascular performance was assessed by a 6 min walking test (6MWT) at admission and discharge, and oxygen consumption (VO2 max) was derived. Within the SCL-90-R score, somatic symptoms (47.4%), depressive and anxiety symptoms (36.8% and 33.3%, respectively), symptoms of phobic anxiety (21.1%), and psychoticism (24.6%) were over-represented. As for the GHQ-12, 75.4% of the sample reported an abnormally negative perception of their health status. An inverse correlation was shown between the variation in 6MWT and SCL depression (p = 0.048), PSDI (p = 0.022), and the GHQ-12 (p = 0.040). Similarly, an inverse correlation was shown between the variation in the VO2 max, GHQ-12 (p = 0.041), and the PSDI (p = 0.023). Post-cardiac surgery cardiac rehabilitation was associated with increased symptoms of psychological discomfort, as compared with the general population. The amplitude of psychological distress, depression, and hostility are associated with limited improvement in performance. These data strengthen the need for psychological support during cardiac rehabilitation programs.

Cardiac telerehabilitation: current status and future perspectives.

Multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves the prognosis and quality of life of patients with cardiovascular disease and has therefore received strong recommendations in international guidelines for the treatment of patients with chronic coronary syndromes and chronic heart failure. Aiming to both resolve several barriers that impede participation in CR and to improve the effectiveness of CR, cardiac telerehabilitation (CTR) has emerged as acost-effective alternative to traditional, centre-based CR. Although the body of evidence for the feasibility and effectiveness of CTR is large and still growing, real-life implementations are scarce, which may be due to insufficient knowledge about CTR interventions and due to the challenges its implementation comes with. Up to now, mainly exercise-related core components of CR and e‑coaching have been investigated in the setting of CTR. Translation of research findings to clinical practice may be hampered by methodological limitations present in most CTR studies, being selection bias of participants, lack of long-term follow-up, heterogeneity of studied interventions and the lack of robust outcome measures. Besides conducting highly needed implementation studies for CTR interventions, their implementation could be facilitated by the development of guideline-based, multidisciplinary and personalised CTR programmes and widespread reimbursement for CTR.

Abstract 17829: Improving Access to Cardiac Rehabilitation for Minorities and Vulnerable Patients With a Multidisciplinary Program in a Large Metropolitan Public Hospital Network

Introduction: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves outcomes after myocardial infarction, cardiac surgery or in chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. However, access to CR is often limited to insured patients or those who can pay out-of-pocket, leaving uninsured or undocumented patients without access to these benefits. Our aim is to describe the implementation and outcomes of a multidisciplinary comprehensive CR program in the largest public health system in the country, as a strategy to mitigate healthcare disparities and improve access to care for minorities. Methods: Our CR program started in March 2021 as a virtual program and opened for in-person care in November 2022. We collected clinical, demographic, socioeconomic, and immigration data as well as data on clinical outcomes such as hospital readmission, mortality, and program completion rates. Results: A total of 202 patients were included (35.6% women, mean age 62), with 83.7% of patients in virtual CR and 16.3 % in in-person CR. The most common ethnic group was Black (41.6%) followed by Hispanic (38.6%). A total of 23.8% were uninsured, 21.3% were undocumented and 52.5% lived below the poverty level reported for New York City. The highest level of education was < 8th grade in 16.8%, high school in 22.8%, at least 2 years of college in 5.5%, > 4 years of college in 7.9% and unknown in 47%. The hospital readmission rate at 6 months was 12.4% and mortality was 1.5%. There were no significant differences in survival or readmission by ethnic group. Of patients completing at least one visit, 72% were active or graduated from virtual CR and 90% were active or graduated for in-person CR (Figure). Conclusions: Our multidisciplinary CR program demonstrates feasibility in providing care to underserved and vulnerable populations, showing excellent results and providing a strategy to decrease healthcare disparities in access to an intervention which improves outcomes across a broad spectrum of cardiac disease.

Physical activity and sedentary behaviour changes during and after cardiac rehabilitation: Can patients be clustered?

Objective: To identify clusters of patients according to changes in their physical behaviour during and after cardiac rehabilitation, and to predict cluster membership.Methods: The study included 533 patients (mean age 57.9 years; 18.2% females) with a recent acute coronary syndrome who participated in a 12-week multi-disciplinary cardiac rehabilitation programme, within a cohort study design. Physical behaviour (light physical activity, moderate-to vigorous physical activity, step count, and sedentary behaviour) was measured using accelerometry at 4 timepoints. To identify clusters of patients according to changes in physical behaviour during and after cardiac rehabilitation, latent class trajectory modelling was applied. Baseline factors to predict cluster membership were assessed using multinomial logistic regression.Results: During and after cardiac rehabilitation, 3 separate clusters were identified for all 4 physical behaviour outcomes: patients with steady levels (comprising 68–83% of the patients), and improving (6–21%) or deteriorating (4–23%) levels. Main predictor for membership to a specific cluster was baseline physical behaviour. Patients with higher starting physical behaviour were more likely to be a member of clusters with deteriorating levels.Conclusion: Separate clusters of physical behaviour changes during and after cardiac rehabilitation could be identified. Clusters were mainly distinguished by baseline physical behaviour level. LAY ABSTRACTPhysical behaviour is a construct including both physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Healthy levels of physical behaviour are important for cardiac patients. Cardiac rehabilitation programs are designed to promote a heart-healthy lifestyle for this group. Nevertheless, not all patients perform sufficient physical activity after cardiac rehabilitation. It is important to identify patients at risk for disappointing physical behaviour outcomes at an early stage to provide additional care. Outcomes of the current study show that cardiac patients can be clustered according to their change in physical behavior during and after cardiac rehabilitation. The majority showed steady levels and no improvements, but we could also identify groups of patients with improving and deteriorating levels. Patients with higher starting physical activity levels or low sedentary behaviour levels were more likely to be a member of clusters with deteriorating levels. These patients could benefit of additional interventions.

Predictors of physical frailty improvement in older patients enrolled in a multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation program

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves clinical and functional recovery in older patients after acute cardiac syndromes, whose outcome is influenced by cardiac disease severity, but also by comorbidity and frailty. The aim of the study was to analyze the predictors of physical frailty improvement during the CR program. Data were collected in all patients aged > 75 years consecutively admitted from 1 January to December 2017 to our CR, consisting of 5-day-per-week of 30-min session of biking or calisthenics on alternate days for 4 weeks. Physical frailty was measured with short physical performance battery (SPPB) at the entry and the end of CR. Outcome was represented by an increase of at least 1 point in the SPPB score from baseline to the end of the CR program. In our study population of 100 patients, mean age 81 years, we demonstrated that a strong predictor of improvement in SPPB score was the poorer performance in the test at baseline; for Δ-1 point of score, we registered an OR 2.50 (95% CI = 1.64–3.85; p = 0.001) of probability to improve the physical performance at the end of CR. Interestingly those patients with worse performance at SPPB balance and chair standing task showed greater probability of ameliorating their physical frailty profile at the end of CR. Our data strongly suggest that CR program after acute cardiac syndrome produces a significant physical frailty improvement in those patients with worse frailty phenotype with an impairment in chair standing or balance at entry.

Effects of Cardiac Rehabilitation on Sleep Quality in Heart Disease Patients with and without Heart Failure

Insomnia is a modifiable cardiovascular risk factor. Previous studies suggested that attending a cardiac rehabilitation program may improve sleep quality in cardiac patients and pointed out the association between heart failure and poor sleep quality. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate sleep quality in patients attending a Multidisciplinary Cardiac Rehabilitation Program (MRCP), and to compare sleep quality between patients with and without heart failure. A prospective observational study was carried out on a consecutive sample of 240 patients attending an 8-week MRCP; 50 patients (20.8%) were included due to heart failure (NYHA stages I-III) and the rest of them after having undergone any revascularization procedure or valvular surgery. Before and after the completion of the MRCP, the quality of sleep was assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score. Post-intervention global PSQI scores were statistically significantly lower than those of pre-intervention (p = 0.008), but only 60 patients (25%) registered a clinically significant improvement. When comparing patients with heart failure with those without, no differences in sleep quality were found. This suggests that only a small percentage of patients can achieve clinically significant improvements in sleep quality attending conventional MCRP. Suggestions for future research are given.

Cardiac Rehabilitation in Advanced aGE after PCI for acute coronary syndromes: predictors of exercise capacity improvement in the CR-AGE ACS study

BackgroundThe positive effect of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on outcomes after acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is established. Nevertheless, enrollment rates into CR programs remain low, although ACS carry a high risk of functional decline particularly in the elderly.AimWe aimed to determine if a multidisciplinary CR improves exercise capacity in an older population discharged after ACS systematically treated with PCI.MethodsCR-AGE ACS is a prospective, single-center, cohort study. All patients aged 75+ years consecutively referred to Cardiac Rehabilitation outpatient Unit at Careggi University Hospital, were screened for eligibility. Moderate/severe cognitive impairment, disability in 2+ basic activities of daily living, musculoskeletal diseases, contraindication to Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test, and diseases with an expected survival < 6 months, were exclusion criteria. Participants attended a CR program, based on 5-day-per-week aerobic training sessions for 4 weeks.ResultsWe enrolled 253 post-ACS patients with a mean age 80.6 ± 4.4 years. After CR, 136 (56.2%) 77 (31.3%) patients obtained, respectively, at least a moderate (∆+5%) or an optimal (∆+15%) increase in VO2peak. Baseline VO2peak (− 1 ml/kg/min: OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.09–1.28), the number of training sessions (+1 session: OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.01–1.15), and mild-to-moderate baseline disability (yes vs. no: OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.01–0.57) were the predictors of VO2peak changes.ConclusionsA CR program started early after discharge from ACS produces a significant increase in exercise capacity in very old patients with mild-to-moderate post-acute physical impairment. Baseline VO2peak, the number of training sessions, and the level of baseline disability are the independent predictors of improvement.

Outcomes With Multidisciplinary Cardiac Rehabilitation in Post-acute Systolic Heart Failure Patients-A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study.

BackgroundCardiac rehabilitation (CR) is recommended for patients with acute heart failure (HF). However, the results of outcome studies and meta-analyses on CR in post-acute care are varied. We aimed to assess the medium- to long-term impact of CR and ascertain the predictors of successful CR.MethodsIn this propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study, records of consecutive patients who survived acute HF (left ventricular ejection fraction <40) and participated in a multidisciplinary HF rehabilitation program post-discharge between May 2014 and July 2019 were reviewed. Patients in the CR group had at least one exercise session within 3 months of discharge; the others were in the non-CR group. After propensity score matching, the primary (all-cause mortality) and secondary (HF readmission and life quality assessment) outcomes were analyzed.ResultsAmong 792 patients, 142 attended at least one session of phase II CR. After propensity score matching for covariates related to HF prognosis, 518 patients were included in the study (CR group, 137 patients). The all-cause mortality rate was 24.9% and the HF rehospitalization rate was 34.6% in the median 3.04-year follow-up. Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that the CR group had a significant reduction in all-cause mortality compared to the non-CR group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.490, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.308–0.778). A lower risk of the primary outcome with CR was observed in patients on renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors, but was not seen in patients who were not prescribed this class of medications (interaction p = 0.014).ConclusionsCardiac rehabilitation participation was associated with reduced all-cause mortality after acute systolic heart failure hospital discharge. Our finding that the benefit of CR was decreased in patients not prescribed RAAS inhibitors warrants further evaluation.

Cardiac rehabilitation in rural and remote areas of North Queensland: How well are we doing?

ObjectiveTo address access to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) for people in R&R areas, this research aimed to investigate: (1) post discharge systems and support for people returning home from hospital following treatment for heart disease (HD). (2) propose changes to improve access to CR in R&R areas of NQ.SettingFour focus communities in R&R areas of NQ.ParticipantsFocus communities’ health staff (resident/visiting) (57), community leaders (10) and community residents (44), discharged from hospital in past 5 years following treatment for heart disease (purposeful sampling).DesignA qualitative descriptive case study, with data collection via semi‐structured interviews. Inductive/deductive thematic analysis was used to identify primary and secondary themes. Health service audit of selected communities.ResultsHealth services in the focus communities included multipurpose health services, and primary health care centres staffed by resident and visiting staff that included nurses, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Workers, medical officers, and allied health professionals. Post‐discharge health care for people with HD was predominantly clinical. Barriers to CR included low referrals to community‐based health professions by discharging hospitals; poorly defined referral pathways; lack of guidelines; inadequate understanding of holistic, multidisciplinary CR by health staff, community participants and leaders; limited centre‐based CR services; lack of awareness, or acceptance of telephone support services.ConclusionTo address barriers identified for CR in R&R areas, health care systems’ revision, including development of referral pathways to local health professionals, CR guidelines and in‐service education, is required to developing a model of care that focuses on self‐management and education: Heart: Road to Health.

A patient-centered multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation program improves glycemic control and functional outcome in coronary artery disease after percutaneous and surgical revascularization.

BackgroundCardiac rehabilitation (CR) is strongly associated with all-cause mortality reduction in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The impact of CR on pathological risk factors, such as impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and functional recovery remains under debate. The aim of the present study is to determine whether CR had a positive effect beside physical exercise improvement on pathological risk factors in IGT and diabetic patients with CAD.MethodsOne hundred and seventy-one consecutive patients participating in a 3-month CR from January 2014 to June 2015 were enrolled. The primary endpoint was defined as an improvement of peak workload and VO2-peak; glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction was considered as secondary endpoint.ResultsEuglycemic patients presented a significant improvement in peak workload compared to diabetic patients (from 5.75 ± 1.45 to 6.65 ± 1.84 METs vs. 4.8 ± 0.8 to 4.9 ± 1.4 METs, p = 0.018). VO2-peak improved in euglycemic patients (VO2-peak from 19.3 ± 5.3 to 22.5 ± 5.9 mL/min/kg, p = 0.003), while diabetic patients presented only a statistically significant trend (VO2-peak from 16.9 ± 4.4 to 18.0 ± 3.8 mL/min/kg, p < 0.056). Diabetic patients have benefited more in terms of blood glucose control compared to IGT patients (HbA1c from 7.7 ± 1.0 to 7.4 ± 1.1 compared to 5.6 ± 0.4 to 5.9 ± 0.5, p = 0.02, respectively).ConclusionsA multidisciplinary CR program improves physical functional capacity in CAD setting, particularly in euglycemic patients. IGT patients as well as diabetic patients may benefit from a CR program, but long-term outcome needs to be clarified in larger studies.

Digital home-based multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation: How to counteract physical inactivity during the COVID-19 pandemic

Introduction and ObjectivesCenter-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs have been forced to close due to COVID-19. Alternative delivery models to maintain access to CR programs and to avoid physical inactivity should be considered. The aim of this study was to assess physical activity (PA) levels after completing a home-based digital CR program. MethodsA total of 116 cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients (62.6±8.9 years, 95 male) who had been attending a face-to-face CR program were recruited and assessed (baseline and at three months) on the following parameters: PA, sedentary behavior, adherence, cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular symptoms, feelings toward the pandemic, dietary habits, risk factor control, safety and adverse events. The intervention consisted of a multidisciplinary digital CR program, including regular patient assessment, and exercise, educational and psychological group sessions. ResultsNinety-eight CVD patients successfully completed all the online assessments (15.5% drop-out rate). A favorable main effect of time was an increase in moderate to vigorous PA and a decrease in sedentary time at three months. Almost half of the participants completed at least one online exercise training session per week and attended at least one of the online educational sessions. No major adverse events were reported and only one minor event occurred. ConclusionDuring the pandemic, levels of moderate to vigorous PA improved after three months of home-based CR in CVD patients with previous experience in a face-to-face CR model. Diversified CR programs with a greater variety of content tailored to individual preferences are needed to meet the motivational and clinical requirements of CVD patients.

Digital home-based multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation: the way to counteract physical inactivity during the COVID-19 pandemic?

Funding AcknowledgementsType of funding sources: None.IntroductionCentre-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs have been forced to close due to the need for physical and social distancing imposed by COVID-19 pandemic. A major problem emerges concerning the potential harmful effects resulting from the suspension of the centre-based CR programs, leading to physical inactivity and unhealthy lifestyle routines. Therefore, the development of alternative delivery models to maintain access to CR programs and to avoid physical inactivity should be organized and tested.PurposeTo assess the physical activity (PA) levels in a group of patients with known cardiovascular disease (CVD), after completing 3-months of a home-based multidisciplinary digital CR program, organized as an alternative method to the centre-based CR suspended program.MethodsOne hundred and sixteen patients with CVD (62.6 ± 8.9 years, 95 males) who were previously attending a face-to-face CR program were included and the following parameters were assessed at baseline and 3 months: self-reported PA and sedentary behaviour, adherence to the online CR program, cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular symptoms, feelings towards the pandemic, dietary habits, risk factor control, safety and adverse events. The intervention consisted in a multidisciplinary digital CR program, including online exercise training sessions, online educational sessions, psychological online group sessions, risk factor control, nutritional and psychological consults and patient regular assessment by cardiologist and nurse.ResultsNinety-eight CVD patients successfully completed all the online assessments (15.5% drop-out). It was observed a significant increase from moderate-to-vigorous PA (230 ± 198 mins/week to 393 ± 378 mins/week, p < 0.001) and a decrease of the sedentary time at 3-months (6.47 ± 3.26 hours/day to 5.17 ± 3.18 hours/day, p < 0.001). Seventy percent of the patients met the PA recommendations and 41% reached more than 300 minutes per week of moderate to vigorous PA at 3 months. Almost half of the participants (46.9%) did at least more than one online exercise training session per week and attended at least one of the online educational sessions. There were no major adverse events reported and only one minor non-cardiovascular event occurred.ConclusionPatients with CVD, who suspended centre-based CR due to COVID-19 pandemic and started a home-based multidisciplinary digital CR program, had a significant improvement in moderate to vigorous PA after 3 months. Therefore, home-based CR programs showed to be a good option for selected clinically stable patients, who are eligible for CR and cannot attend a centre-based CR program due to COVID-19 pandemic or eventually other reasons.

Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation - the real barriers of programs at distance

Funding AcknowledgementsType of funding sources: None.IntroductionDespite the established benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), it remains significantly underutilized. Home-based CR (CR-HB) programs should offer the same core CR components as Centre-based programs (CR-CB) but several aspects need to be adapted, communication and supervision must be improved. Although CR-HB has been successfully deployed and is a valuable alternative to CR-CB, there is less structured experience with these non-uniform programs and further studies are needed to understand which patients (pts) are indicated to this type of program.PurposeTo investigate pt-perceived facilitators and barriers to home-based rehabilitation exercise.MethodsProspective cohort study which included pts who were participating in a CR-CB program and accepted to participate in a CR-HB program after CR-CB closure due to COVID-19. The CR-HB consisted in a multidisciplinary digital CR program, including pt risk evaluation and regular assessment, exercise, educational and psychological sessions. The online exercise training sessions consisted of recorded videos and real time online supervised exercise training group sessions. It was recommended to do each session 3 times per week, during 60 min. A pictorial exercise training guidebook was available to all participants including instructions regarding safety, clothing and warm-up, and a detailed illustrated description of each exercise sessions. Also, for questions or difficulties regarding the exercises, an e-mail and telephone was provided. Once a month, real time CR exercise sessions was provided with a duration of 60min.Results116 cardiovascular disease pts (62.6 ± 8.9years, 95 males) who were attending a face-to-face CR program were included in a CR-HB program. The majority of the pts had coronary artery disease (89%) and 5% valvular disease. Regarding risk factors, obesity was the most common (75%) followed by hypertension (60%), family history (42%), dyslipidaemia (38%), diabetes (18%), and smoking (13%). Almost half (47%) of the participants did at least one online exercise training session per week: 58% did 2-3 times per week, 27% once per week and 15% more than 4 times per week. Participants who did less than one exercise session per week reported as cause: lack of motivation (38%), preference of a different mode of exercise training such as exercise in the exterior space (26%), technology barrier such as impossibility to stream online videos (11%), fear of performing exercise without supervision (4%), and limited space at home (4%).ConclusionsOur study based on real-life results of a CR-HB program shows a sub-optimal rate of participation in exercise sessions due to different causes, but mainly for the lack of motivation to exercise alone or preference for walking in exterior space. The knowledge of the CR-HB program barriers will facilitate to find out strategies to increase the participation rate and to select the best candidates for this type of programs.

The impact of additional resistance and balance training in exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in older patients after valve surgery or intervention: randomized control trial

BackgroundTo evaluate the short- and mid-term effect of a specially tailored resistance and balance training provided in addition to usual cardiac rehabilitation (CR) care program in older patients after valve surgery/intervention.MethodsSingle-center (inpatient CR clinic in Lithuania) randomized controlled trial. Two hundred fifty-two patients were assessed for eligibility on the first day of admittance to CR early after (14.5 ± 5.9 days) valve surgery/intervention between January 2018 and November 2019. Participants were coded centrally in accordance with randomization 1:1 using a computerized list. Control group (CG) patients were provided with usual care phase-II-CR inpatient multidisciplinary CR program, while intervention group (IG) patients received additional resistance and balance training (3 d/wk). Patients participated in a 3-month follow-up. Main outcome measures were functional capacity (6 min walk test (6MWT, meters), cardiopulmonary exercise testing), physical performance (Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB, score) and 5-m walk test (5MWT, meters/second)), strength (one repetition maximum test for leg press), physical frailty (SPPB, 5MWT).ResultsOne hundred sixteen patients (76.1 ± 6.7 years, 50% male) who fulfilled the study inclusion criteria were randomized to IG (n = 60) or CG (n = 56) and participated in CR (18.6 ± 2.7 days). As a result, 6MWT (IG 247 ± 94.1 vs. 348 ± 100.1, CG 232 ± 102.8 vs. 333 ± 120.7), SPPB (IG 8.31 ± 2.21 vs. 9.51 ± 2.24, CG 7.95 ± 2.01 vs. 9.08 ± 2.35), 5MWT (IG 0.847 ± 0.31 vs. 0.965 ± 0.3, CG 0.765 ± 0.24 vs 0.879 ± 0.29) all other outcome variables and physical frailty level improved significantly (p < 0.05) in both groups with no significant difference between groups. Improvements were sustained over the 3-month follow-up for 6MWT (IG 348 ± 113 vs. CG 332 ± 147.4), SPPB (IG 10.37 ± 1.59 vs CG 9.44 ± 2.34), 5MWT (IG 1.086 ± 0. 307 vs CG 1.123 ± 0.539) and other variables. Improvement in physical frailty level was significantly more pronounced in IG (p < 0.05) after the 3-month follow-up.ConclusionExercise-based CR improves functional and exercise capacity, physical performance, and muscular strength, and reduces physical frailty levels in patients after valve surgery/intervention in the short and medium terms. SPPB score and 5MWT were useful for physical frailty assessment, screening and evaluation of outcomes in a CR setting. Additional benefit from the resistance and balance training could not be confirmed.Trial registrationNCT04234087, retrospectively registered 21 January 2020.

Post-myocardial infarction rehabilitation and secondary prevention in hospitals.

Norwegian studies have documented poor cardiovascular risk factor control and a high incidence of new cardiovascular events in myocardial infarction patients. There is little knowledge about the scope of secondary prevention treatment and cardiac rehabilitation in Norwegian hospitals. Therefore, we wanted to conduct a survey of discharge routines and outpatient follow-up after myocardial infarction. In October 2018, the heads of cardiology departments and nurse managers/physiotherapists at cardiology outpatient clinics at all Norwegian hospitals (N = 51) were contacted and asked to take part in a telephone interview. A total of 40 doctors (78%) and 51nurses/physiotherapists (100%) conducted the telephone interview. Eleven hospitals used standardised discharge summary templates with treatment targets and expected follow-up. Ten hospitals offered routine outpatient follow-up. A total of 47hospitals (92%) offered multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation, 'heart school' classes or cardiac exercise training, and of these 9 (18%) offered multidisciplinary comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation in line with international recommendations. The survey revealed considerable differences in reported discharge routines and the provision of cardiac rehabilitation and outpatient follow-up at Norwegian hospitals.

When to Return for Usual Activity After ACS The Benefit of Cardiac Rehabilitation

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) can be managed as global long-term care and comprehensive risk reduction of cardiac patients based on preventive care through a professional multi-disciplinary integrated process approach.11 Multidisciplinary CR elements include: patient evaluations, physical activity counselling, exercise training, diet/nutritional counseling, psychosocial management, lipid management, smoking avoidance, management of weight, and regulation of blood pressure. Exercise training if begun at the post-ACS acute phase, would achieve its greatest beneficial effect on the process of LV remodeling in the dysfunctional LV and cardiopulmonary rehabilitation in patients after acute coronary syndrome. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) can be managed as global long-term care and comprehensive risk reduction of cardiac patients based on preventive care through a professional multi-disciplinary integrated process approach

Atrial Fibrillation: the Association with Physical Activity and the Effects of Cardiac Rehabilitation

The purpose of this review was to present modern studies that examine the relationship of physical activity and risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) development and the impact of cardiac rehabilitation programs in patients with all forms of AF. Data of 52 Russian and foreign scientific sources published in 1998- 2020 were presented. In our study, 48 patients with paroxysmal AF after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) were randomly assigned to a physical rehabilitation/standard therapy or control (standard therapy) group. Aerobic physical training was conducted for 6 months 3 times a week. AF is one of the most common cardiac arrhythmias. Despite modern advances, results of treatment of this disease are far from optimal. Many problems of patients with AF can be addressed through enrolment in multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation programs. But this question remains open. This is mainly due to the complexity of selection of physical rehabilitation program for patients with AF. It is known that physical activity can trigger an episode of AF. In the following review article, the approaches to functional capacity assessment of patient with AF are described, recommendations for prescribing safe exercise training to achieve a therapeutic effect are presented. Various aspects of the effects of physical rehabilitation are discussed, including its impact on cardiovascular risk factors, influence on atrial remodeling processes and associated biomarkers, prevention of AF progression and occurrence of cardiovascular complications. Results of our own research indicate effectiveness of physical training in patients with AF after RFA: increase in exercise duration by 18.6% (p&lt;0.001) and load by 24.8% (p&lt;0.01) during exercise test, increase in level of everyday physical activity by 23.8% (p=0.001); left atrium dimensions remain stable comparing with control group. That was combined with a decrease of post ablation atrial arrhythmias: after 6 months, they were registered in 4.5% of trained patients vs 17.4% of control group patients (p&lt;0.01). Steady growth in the number of patients with AF and catheter ablation procedures around the world dictates the need for organization of multi-purpose medical rehabilitation.

National quality indicators to promote cardiac rehabilitation service effectiveness in Australia

Abstract Background/Introduction Comprehensive exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has well-established efficacy and effectiveness for improving patients' outcomes. There is substantial variability in terms of clinical effectiveness and quality measurement of CR programs internationally which limits service improvement initiatives. In Australia in 2018 a the Australian Cardiovascular Health and Rehabilitation Association (ACRA) and the National Heart Foundation of Australia (NHFA) combined forces to develop nationally-agreed, internationally-consistent, locally-relevant quality indicators (QI). Purpose To provide a minimum set of standardised national-level QI that should be collected and reported on by CR programs to determine the quality of delivery and associated outcomes, benchmark performance and support improvement processes. Methods We formed the National Cardiac Rehabilitation Measurement (NCRM) Taskforce led by ACRA and NHF and used the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) UK guidelines to develop high quality QIs. The process included topic overview, prioritising areas for quality improvement, drafting and consultation, validation and consistency checking. Results Eleven preliminary QIs were circulated for ranking and comment to all ACRA members (predominately multidisciplinary CR providers) (68 responses), and to leading national multidisciplinary CR experts from cardiology, research, physiotherapy, nursing, epidemiology and register backgrounds (7 responses). Ratings, comments and suggestions were collated and discussed by the NCRM Taskforce, and the indicators rated most important, useful and feasible were retained, resulting in 10 QIs. These 10 QIs were presented at the ACRA national conference and then discussed at a workshop (55 participants) for this purpose. Ten QIs and accompanying data dictionary with definitions, evidence and allowable values is the final product. Conclusions A minimum set of locally relevant, internationally recognised, national QIs for CR is now available for CR providers, health service managers and researchers in Australia, which may be relevant internationally. The QIs will best serve national interests incorporated within a national cardiac registry but will also be useful for site audits and have strong potential to be aggregated across sites, health districts and states. The definitive test of the QIs will be how useful they are for CR program coordinators and funders of such programs; a key consideration for building sustainable business models and ensuring long-term implementation. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Short-Term Exercise Progression of Cardiovascular Patients throughout Cardiac Rehabilitation: An Observational Study.

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a highly recommended secondary prevention measure for patients with diagnosed cardiovascular disease. Unfortunately, participation rates are low due to enrollment and adherence issues. As such, new CR delivery strategies are of interest, as to improve overall CR delivery. The goal of the study was to obtain a better understanding of the short-term progression of functional capacity throughout multidisciplinary CR, measured as the change in walking distance between baseline six-minute walking test (6MWT) and four consecutive follow-up tests. One-hundred-and-twenty-nine patients diagnosed with cardiovascular disease participated in the study, of which 89 patients who completed the whole study protocol were included in the statistical analysis. A one-way repeated measures ANOVA was conducted to determine whether there was a significant change in mean 6MWT distance (6MWD) throughout CR. A three-way-mixed ANOVA was performed to determine the influence of categorical variables on the progression in 6MWD between groups. Significant differences in mean 6MWD between consecutive measurements were observed. Two subgroups were identified based on the change in distance between baseline and end-of-study. Patients who increased most showed a linear progression. In the other group progression leveled off halfway through rehabilitation. Moreover, the improvement during the initial phase of CR seemed to be indicative for overall progression. The current study adds to the understanding of the short-term progression in exercise capacity of patients diagnosed with cardiovascular disease throughout a CR program. The results are not only of interest for CR in general, but could be particularly relevant in the setting of home-based CR.