Multidisciplinary Antimicrobial Stewardship Team Research Articles

Combination of a Rapid Diagnostic Assay and Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention for Gram-Negative Bacteremia.

Traditional blood cultures for gram-negative bacteremia can take up to 72 hours or more to return results, prolonging the duration of empiric broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics. The Accelerate Pheno system provides rapid identification and susceptibilities for blood cultures in gram-negative bacteremia. Current data on its clinical utility are mixed overall, so the system requires further research. A multicenter, retrospective quasi-experimental study was conducted comparing the Accelerate Pheno rapid diagnostic system with antimicrobial stewardship intervention and traditional blood cultures alone. A total of 264 patients with blood cultures with gram-negative bacteria growth were included in the final analysis (102 pre-intervention, 162 post-intervention). The antimicrobial stewardship team made 364 recommendations in 152/162 (93.8%) patients in the post group. Duration of intravenous therapy was shorter (P < .001) for the post-intervention group (median, 4.0 days) compared with the pre-intervention group (median, 7.5 days). Hospital length of stay was also shorter (P < .001) for the post-intervention group (median, 5.1 days) compared with the pre-intervention group (median, 7.0 days). Readmission rates within 30 days were reduced (P = .042) post-intervention (13.0%) compared with pre-intervention (22.6%). In the post-intervention group, a larger proportion of patients were transitioned to oral therapy at any point (126/162, 77.8%) compared with pre-intervention (62/102, 60.8%; P < .001). These results suggest that the Accelerate Pheno system, with active review and intervention by a multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship team, is a useful tool in improving both patient-centric and antimicrobial stewardship outcomes.

Knowledge, awareness and practices of healthcare workers regarding antimicrobial use, resistance and stewardship in Zambia: a multi-facility cross-sectional study.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a threat to public health globally. Despite its consequences, there is little information about the knowledge, awareness, and practices towards AMR among healthcare workers (HCWs). Therefore, this study assessed the knowledge, awareness and practices regarding antimicrobial use (AMU), AMR and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) among HCWs who are involved in the implementation of AMS activities across eight hospitals in Zambia. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 64 HCWs from October to December 2023 using a semi-structured questionnaire. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS version 25.0. Of the 64 HCWs, 59.4% were females, 60.9% were aged between 25 and 34 years, 37.5% were nurses, 18.7% were pharmacists, 17.2% were medical doctors and only one was a microbiologist. Overall, 75% of the HCWs had good knowledge, 84% were highly aware and 84% had good practices regarding AMU, AMR and AMS. Most of the HCWs (90.6%) responded that they had a multidisciplinary AMS team at their hospitals and were implementing the use of the WHO AWaRe classification of antibiotics. This study found good knowledge levels, high awareness and good practices regarding AMU, AMR and AMS among HCWs who were involved in the implementation of AMS activities in hospitals in Zambia. Additionally, most hospitals have been conducting AMS training and implementing the use of the WHO AWaRe classification of antibiotics. However, there is still a need to address some identified gaps in AMU and AMR through the strengthening of AMS activities in hospitals.

Antimicrobial Stewardship and Improved Antibiotic Utilization in the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.

We developed a multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship team to optimize antimicrobial use within the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit. A quality improvement initiative was conducted to decrease unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotic use by 20%, with sustained change over 12 months. We conducted this quality improvement initiative within a quaternary care center. PDSA cycles focused on antibiotic overuse, provider education, and practice standardization. The primary outcome measure was days of therapy (DOT)/1000 patient days. Process measures included electronic medical record order-set use. Balancing measures focused on alternative antibiotic use, overall mortality, and sepsis-related mortality. Data were analyzed using statistical process control charts. A significant and sustained decrease in DOT was observed for vancomycin and meropenem. Vancomycin use decreased from a baseline of 198 DOT to 137 DOT, a 31% reduction. Meropenem use decreased from 103 DOT to 34 DOT, a 67% reduction. These changes were sustained over 24 months. The collective use of gram-negative antibiotics, including meropenem, cefepime, and piperacillin-tazobactam, decreased from a baseline of 323 DOT to 239 DOT, a reduction of 26%. There was no reciprocal increase in cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam use. Key interventions involved electronic medical record changes, including automatic stop times and empiric antibiotic standardization. All-cause mortality remained unchanged. The initiation of a dedicated antimicrobial stewardship initiative resulted in a sustained reduction in meropenem and vancomycin usage. Interventions did not lead to increased utilization of alternative broad-spectrum antimicrobials or increased mortality. Future interventions will target additional broad-spectrum antimicrobials.

Clinical impact of multidisciplinary carbapenem stewardship interventions: a retrospective cohort study.

Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program aims to optimise antimicrobial utilisation and curb antimicrobial resistance. We investigated the clinical impact of AMS among patients with carbapenem in medical wards of a tertiary hospital. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on hospitalised adult patients treated with carbapenem and reviewed by a multidisciplinary AMS team. We compared the clinical outcomes of accepted (n = 103) and not-accepted AMS intervention cases (n = 37). The outcomes evaluated include trends of total white blood cells (TWBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), body temperature at day-7, and clinical status at day-30 post-AMS intervention. The interventions included discontinuation (50%), de-escalation (47.9%) and escalation (2.1%) of antibiotics, where the acceptance rate was 67.1%, 80.6% and 66.7%, respectively. Overall, we found no significant difference in clinical outcomes between accepted and not-accepted AMS interventions at day-7 and day-30 post-interventions. On day-7, 62.0% of patients in the accepted group showed decreased or normalised TWBC and CRP levels compared to 47.4% of the not-accepted group (p = 0.271). The mortality at day-30 (32% versus 35%, p = 0.73), discharge rate (53.4% versus 45.9%, p = 0.437), and median length of hospital stay (36.0 versus 30.0days, p = 0.526) between the groups were comparable. The predictors of 30-day mortality in the study subjects were Charlson Comorbidity Index > 3 (OR: 2.84, 95% CI 1.28-6.29, p = 0.010) and being febrile at day-7 (OR: 4.58, 95% CI 1.83-11.5, p = 0.001). AMS interventions do not result in significant adverse clinical impact and mortality risk.

An app a day: Results of pre- and post-surveys of knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding antimicrobial stewardship principles among nurses who utilized a novel learning platform.

Nurses perform several functions that are integral for antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). However, nurses are underrepresented in research and underutilized in implementation of AMS interventions. The objective of this pilot study was to assess the effect of asynchronous microlearning on inpatient nursing staff knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding AMS principles. A team of pharmacists, physicians, and nurses developed 9 case-based, multiple-choice questions with accompanying educational explanations on associated AMS principles. One case was delivered to participants daily via an institutional web-based application (QuizTime). A KAP survey with 20 questions on a 5-point Likert scale was administered before and after the intervention. Survey results were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Participants' mean survey score after the intervention demonstrated statistically significant improvement for 18 (90%) of 20 items compared to before the intervention. Participants' confidence improved in key AMS activities: (1) differentiating between colonization and infection (mean difference, 0.63; P < .001), (2) identifying unnecessary urine cultures and inappropriate treatment of urinary tract infections (mean difference, 0.94; P < .001), (3) recognizing opportunities for intravenous to oral therapy conversion (mean difference, 1.07; P < .001), and (4) assessing for antibiotic-associated adverse effects (mean difference, 0.54; P < .001). Nursing education provided through an asynchronous, microlearning format via a mobile platform resulted in statistically significant improvement in most KAP topics. Nurses are integral members of a multidisciplinary AMS team, and novel education methods can help equip them with the necessary AMS tools. This pilot study forms the basis for expanded AMS educational efforts in all healthcare professionals.

Antimicrobial stewardship in pediatric solid organ transplantation: Is it possible?

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at increased risk of severe outcomes associated with antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) play a vital role in mitigating the negative impacts of AMR. Pediatric evidence regarding ASP for SOT recipients is scarce, although many pediatric SOT centers have implemented different forms of ASP. This article summarized the available evidence relating to AMR among pediatric SOT recipients and discussed key strategies for the successful implementation of ASP among this population. The focus is primarily on antibacterial and secondarily on antifungal management. The development of multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship teams for pediatric SOT recipients is essential for successful stewardship implementation. Key stakeholders may include but are not limited to SOT recipients and their caregivers, primary SOT teams (transplant physicians, transplant pharmacists, transplant unit nurses, and transplant outpatient care team), transplant surgery teams, transplant infectious diseases teams, hospital AST, microbiology teams, infection prevention teams, quality improvement teams, and information technology teams. As the evidence for optimal ASP in pediatric SOT is still evolving, it is important to measure the impact of implemented interventions.

Prospective audit and feedback implementation by a multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship team shortens the time to de-escalation of anti-MRSA agents.

Prospective audit and feedback (PAF) is considered an effective procedure for appropriate antibiotic use. However, its effect on the time to de-escalation is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the effect of daily PAF implementation, focusing on the time to de-escalation of anti-methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) agents as an outcome measure. To this end, a single-center, retrospective, quasi-experimental study including patients treated with intravenous anti-MRSA agents during pre-PAF (April 1, 2014 to March 31, 2015) and post-PAF (April 1, 2015 to March 31, 2016) periods was conducted. The time to de-escalation was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to assess the effect of daily PAF implementation on the time to de-escalation. Interrupted time series analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between daily PAF implementation and anti-MRSA agent utilization data converted to defined daily dose (DDD) and days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 patient days. The median time to de-escalation was significantly shorter in the post-PAF period than in the pre-PAF period (6 days vs. 7 days, P < 0.001). According to multivariate analysis, PAF implementation was independently associated with a shorter time to de-escalation (hazard ratio [HR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02 to 1.35). There were no significant differences in hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and length of stay between the two periods. Interrupted time series analysis showed significant reductions in the trends of DDD (trend change, –0.65; 95% CI, –1.20 to –0.11) and DOT (trend change, –0.74; 95% CI, –1.33 to –0.15) between the pre-PAF and post-PAF periods. Daily PAF implementation for patients treated with intravenous anti-MRSA agents led to a shorter time to de-escalation and lower consumption of anti-MRSA agents without worsening the clinically important outcomes.

It is time to define an organizational model for the prevention and management of infections along the surgical pathway: a worldwide cross-sectional survey

BackgroundThe objectives of the study were to investigate the organizational characteristics of acute care facilities worldwide in preventing and managing infections in surgery; assess participants’ perception regarding infection prevention and control (IPC) measures, antibiotic prescribing practices, and source control; describe awareness about the global burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and IPC measures; and determine the role of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic on said awareness.MethodsA cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted contacting 1432 health care workers (HCWs) belonging to a mailing list provided by the Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery. The self-administered questionnaire was developed by a multidisciplinary team. The survey was open from May 22, 2021, and June 22, 2021. Three reminders were sent, after 7, 14, and 21 days.ResultsThree hundred four respondents from 72 countries returned a questionnaire, with an overall response rate of 21.2%. Respectively, 90.4% and 68.8% of participants stated their hospital had a multidisciplinary IPC team or a multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship team. Local protocols for antimicrobial therapy of surgical infections and protocols for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis were present in 76.6% and 90.8% of hospitals, respectively. In 23.4% and 24.0% of hospitals no surveillance systems for surgical site infections and no monitoring systems of used antimicrobials were implemented. Patient and family involvement in IPC management was considered to be slightly or not important in their hospital by the majority of respondents (65.1%). Awareness of the global burden of AMR among HCWs was considered very important or important by 54.6% of participants. The COVID-19 pandemic was considered by 80.3% of respondents as a very important or important factor in raising HCWs awareness of the IPC programs in their hospital. Based on the survey results, the authors developed 15 statements for several questions regarding the prevention and management of infections in surgery. The statements may be the starting point for designing future evidence-based recommendations.ConclusionAdequacy of prevention and management of infections in acute care facilities depends on HCWs behaviours and on the organizational characteristics of acute health care facilities to support best practices and promote behavioural change. Patient involvement in the implementation of IPC is still little considered. A debate on how operationalising a fundamental change to IPC, from being solely the HCWs responsibility to one that involves a collaborative relationship between HCWs and patients, should be opened.

A Study of Outcome Measures and Establishment of Benchmarks for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs

Over the past few decades, the effectiveness of antibiotics has been diminished owing to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance resulting from the overuse of antibiotics. Antimicrobial stewardship aims to improve the appropriateness of antibiotic use to reduce antimicrobial resistance and benefit patients. Antimicrobial stewardship requires structural prerequisites for implementing antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs), such as the presence of a multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship team (AST), to ensure appropriate antimicrobial use at healthcare facilities. However, manpower shortage for ASTs in most Japanese hospitals has resulted in limited implementation of ASPs. Our study provided a directive for promotion of comprehensive ASPs including various outcome measures. Our findings would provide useful benchmarks for hospitals planning to implement ASPs in Japan as well as around the world. This review provides a framework for evaluating the outcome measures and benchmarks of ASPs based on our study.

Implementation of a multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship programme in a Philippine tertiary care hospital: an evaluation by repeated point prevalence surveys

Optimising antimicrobial prescribing in hospitals through antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is essential in addressing the global threat of antimicrobial resistance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a hospital-wide programme, delivered by a multidisciplinary AMS team, on antimicrobial prescribing outcomes. The AMS programme consisted of a combination of persuasive, restrictive, and structural components and was implemented in two phases. We used data from the Global-PPS, collected every six months between September 2017 and December 2019, to measure the antimicrobial use prevalence and monitor selected antibiotic prescribing quality indicators. A significantly increasing trend (P < 0.001) was observed for the indicators related to documentation of prescribing, that is the reason for treatment and stop or review date. We observed a significantly decreasing trend (P < 0.001) in the number of prescriptions for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) prescribed for more than 24 h; however, sample sizes for surgical patients were small. For these three indicators, a sudden and pronounced improvement was seen after the second set of interventions, which consisted of (i) an antibiotic documentation policy, (ii) a 24-h automatic stop order for SAP, and (iii) dissemination of new SAP guidelines. A significantly decreasing trend was also observed for hospital-wide antimicrobial use prevalence (P < 0.001). The implementation of a multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship programme positively influenced antibiotic prescribing practices. Further research should address long-term trends in antibiotic prescribing to establish whether these coordinated activities have led to a sustained behaviour change among prescribers, thereby also evaluating clinical outcomes and antimicrobial resistance rates.

Time and personnel requirements for antimicrobial stewardship in small hospitals in a rural area in Germany

BackgroundIn order to control their anti-infectives consumption, hospitals are required to provide multidisciplinary teams comprising among others an infectiologist, a microbiologist and a pharmacist. Small hospitals though often do not dispose of the defaulted personnel. This study illustrates a solution for an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) in small community hospitals in a rural area in Germany. MethodsFour hospitals of ca. 200 beds each, jointly hired an antimicrobial stewardship expert to start a common ASP. This expert did rounds on every ward once a week, mostly as chard reviews with the physician in charge. Outside the rounds, he could be consulted by mail. Working time and number of visited patients were documented. Anti-infectives consumption, incidence of Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) and mortality rates were retrieved from routinely collected data. The intervention period (01/2018–12/2018) was compared to the preintervention period (01/2017–12/2017). Results3321 patients were visited in the intervention period. In average, 20 patients were seen per day and 20 min were needed per patient/ chard. About 65% of the expert’s working time was needed for rounds, 15% for driving between the hospitals. The anti-infectives consumption of the 4 hospitals in the preintervention period amounted to 50 defined daily doses per 100 occupied bed days. The total consumption was reduced by 10% and of quinolones by 36%. The incidence of hospital-acquired CDI receded from 0.14 to 0.07 cases per 100 patient days (−50%, p = 0.001). The overall in-hospital mortality did not change. ConclusionsA single expert was able to implement a successfull ASP in 4 hospitals. While multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship teams are ideal for tertiary care hospitals, small hospitals need a more practical solution. This survey shows that one expert can be sufficient for several small hospitals even with the distances in a rural setting.

Impact of the multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship team intervention focusing on carbapenem de-escalation: A single-centre and interrupted time series analysis.

BackgroundAs a result of the constant increase in carbapenem resistance amongst gram‐negative bacteria in several countries, the inappropriate use of carbapenems must be reduced. Antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) aim to improve carbapenem usage by implementing interventions, including the promotion of the de‐escalation (DE) strategy. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of this strategy on carbapenem use based on a clear definition of DE.MethodsThe post‐prescription review and feedback (PPRF) strategy, which is used to optimise carbapenem use, was implemented by the antimicrobial stewardship team (AST). We compared the DE rate during the pre‐AST intervention period (from April 2017 to March 2018) and post‐AST intervention period (from April 2018 to March 2019).ResultA total of 1500 patients (n = 771 in the pre‐AST intervention period and n = 729 in the intervention post‐AST period) were admitted to the hospital. The average duration of antibiotic therapy decreased from 9.9 to 7.7 days. The DE rate significantly increased in the post‐AST intervention period compared with the pre‐AST intervention period (51.4% vs 40.3%; P < .001).ConclusionThe PPRF strategy implemented by the AST could improve the carbapenem usage by increasing the DE rate of carbapenem.

2037. A Novel Strategy of Antimicrobial Stewardship in Shanghai: Preliminary Practice with Integration of Three Surveillance Networks

BackgroundThe bacterial resistance surveillance networks, antimicrobial clinical use surveillance networks and provincial hospital-acquired infection (HAI) surveillance have been well established in China. They aim to inform the current situation of bacterial resistance, antimicrobial use and HAI, and to guide the rational use of antimicrobials. However, these three networks presently are running separately. To increase the data value in antimicrobial stewardship (AMS)practice, those three surveillance networks are integrated in ShanghaiMethodsThe Committee of Rational Use of Antimicrobials and AMS of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission, consisting of health administrators, clinical physicians and microbiologists, clinical pharmacologists and infection control experts, was formed in 2017. The oversight committee developed a comprehensive AMS score index mainly based on the surveillance data of the three networks to evaluate the AMS requirements in the hospitals. The AMS score index consists of 3 surveillance network indexes: resistance weight index; antimicrobial weight index and HAI weight index; each of the indexes is further divided into two parts, namely the surveillance quality score and data-related score. For example, the data-related score in the resistance index is calculated for the prevalence of 6 most important MDR/XDR bacteria (CRKP, CRAB, CRPA, ESBL, MRSA, VRE). A multi-disciplinary AMS team was convened to provide expert on-site visit of the hospitals and offered AMS support in the form of practical guidance and advice.ResultsAMS score and detailed score such as the prevalence of CRKP were ranked among 50 hospitals within the networks. These scores will support the AMS team to find out the main drivers of resistance/antibiotic use and thereby support appropriate interventions during the on-site visit. For example, a hospital visited which had a high consumption of carbapenems (ranked third in Shanghai) and also had a high percentage of carbapenems used in the department of liver transplantation. The advice of the on-site visit team was to encourage a more diverse group of antibiotics so as to spare carbapenems.ConclusionInvolvement of the multi-disciplinary team and integration of surveillance networks are very helpful in AMS practice.Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Outcomes of Intervention by Multidisciplinary Antimicrobial Stewardship Team for Treating &lt;i&gt;Staphylococcus aureus&lt;/i&gt; bacteremia

Outcomes of Intervention by Multidisciplinary Antimicrobial Stewardship Team for Treating &lt;i&gt;Staphylococcus aureus&lt;/i&gt; bacteremia

Essential human resources for antimicrobial stewardship teams in Japan: Estimates from a nationwide survey conducted by the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy

Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) with multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship teams (ASTs) is critical for appropriate antimicrobial use at healthcare facilities. Although the Japanese medical reimbursement system was revised to allow fees for ASP implementation, several concerns remain, including understaffing and enforcement of the recommendations on ASTs and ASPs in practice. Furthermore, there are no recommendations on full-time equivalents (FTEs) of the core members in ASTs in Japan. This committee report presents our recommendations on ASTs based on an analysis of the nationwide survey on implemented ASPs and staff FTEs at 1358 healthcare facilities conducted by the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy. Our report provides a directive for structural and financial support of ASTs and should aid in planning for the enhancement of AST practices and the organization of new ASTs.

Antimicrobial stewardship for acute-care hospitals: An Asian perspective.

Inappropriate use of antibiotics is contributing to a serious antimicrobial resistance problem in Asian hospitals. Despite resource constraints in the region, all Asian hospitals should implement antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs to optimize antibiotic treatment, improve patient outcomes, and minimize antimicrobial resistance. This document describes a consensus statement from a panel of regional experts to help multidisciplinary AMS teams design programs that suit the needs and resources of their hospitals. In general, AMS teams must decide on appropriate interventions (eg, prospective audit and/or formulary restriction) for their hospital, focusing on the most misused antibiotics and problematic multidrug-resistant organisms. This focus is likely to include carbapenem use with the goal to reduce carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Rather than initially trying to introduce a comprehensive, hospital-wide AMS program, it would be practical to begin by pilot testing a simple program based on 1 achievable core intervention for the hospital. AMS team members must work together to determine the most suitable AMS interventions to implement in their hospitals and how best to put them into practice. Continuous monitoring and feedback of outcomes to the AMS teams, hospital administration, and prescribers will enhance sustainability of the AMS programs.

The role of the ‘A’ team in the hospital near you

It is very probably that our hospital has some degree of constrained human and material resources. Implementing an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) in these settings is a challenge. Leadership commitment by hospital authorities is important to ensure allocation of the necessary resources to support ASPs. Establishing a multi-disciplinary antimicrobial stewardship team (AST) with full administrative support is essential .Its constitution should be adapted to currently available human resources in every each facility, and all partieś leaders might be creative despite many barriers that will necessary appear during the implementation process. The AST is usually composed by a core group (physicians, pharmacist, microbiologist) and supporter members. The coordinator might be a doctor (e.g, ID specialist or one ̈natural leader̈, respected and with knowledge in the prudent management of antimicrobials) or a clinical pharmacist. The latter has many tasks in the ASP (e.g, review requests of antimicrobials, provide feed-back during ward rounds, detect unnecessary prescriptions). Microbiologists should ideally have some training in clinical microbiology. Doctors from key units (e.g, UCI, Internal Medicine, Surgery) would facilitate the dissemination and adherence to guidelines, generate discussions on antimicrobial prescriptions in his unit and collaborate in the implementation of AMS strategies. Main supporter members could be representatives of the IPC team, nurses, patient safety and information technology. The AST should design which strategies could better fit, foreseeing the program as a step-by-step dynamic process. For example, in settings with a small AST and without previous experiences in ASP, it would be necessary to implement a pre-prescription authorization strategy for some antimicrobials, accompanying it with targeted education initiatives. Later, once the “stewardship spirit” is more disseminated along the hospital, pre-authorization will probably be not necessary, and main strategy could progressively turn to post-prescription audit and feed-back. Education initiatives in multiple forms (e.g, face to face, classes and clinical case discussions) and communication of progresses are also essential. Monitoring the ASP might give an idea of what needs to be emphasized to improve AMS in our hospital.

The Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery: defining a model for antimicrobial stewardship\u2014results from an international cross-sectional survey

BackgroundAntimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs) have been promoted to optimize antimicrobial usage and patient outcomes, and to reduce the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant organisms. However, the best strategies for an ASP are not definitively established and are likely to vary based on local culture, policy, and routine clinical practice, and probably limited resources in middle-income countries. The aim of this study is to evaluate structures and resources of antimicrobial stewardship teams (ASTs) in surgical departments from different regions of the world.MethodsA cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted in 2016 on 173 physicians who participated in the AGORA (Antimicrobials: A Global Alliance for Optimizing their Rational Use in Intra-Abdominal Infections) project and on 658 international experts in the fields of ASPs, infection control, and infections in surgery.ResultsThe response rate was 19.4%. One hundred fifty-six (98.7%) participants stated their hospital had a multidisciplinary AST. The median number of physicians working inside the team was five [interquartile range 4–6]. An infectious disease specialist, a microbiologist and an infection control specialist were, respectively, present in 80.1, 76.3, and 67.9% of the ASTs. A surgeon was a component in 59.0% of cases and was significantly more likely to be present in university hospitals (89.5%, p < 0.05) compared to community teaching (83.3%) and community hospitals (66.7%). Protocols for pre-operative prophylaxis and for antimicrobial treatment of surgical infections were respectively implemented in 96.2 and 82.3% of the hospitals. The majority of the surgical departments implemented both persuasive and restrictive interventions (72.8%). The most common types of interventions in surgical departments were dissemination of educational materials (62.5%), expert approval (61.0%), audit and feedback (55.1%), educational outreach (53.7%), and compulsory order forms (51.5%).ConclusionThe survey showed a heterogeneous organization of ASPs worldwide, demonstrating the necessity of a multidisciplinary and collaborative approach in the battle against antimicrobial resistance in surgical infections, and the importance of educational efforts towards this goal.

Clinical impact of non-antibiotic recommendations by a multi-disciplinary antimicrobial stewardship team

IntroductionThe multi-disciplinary antimicrobial stewardship team at the study hospital conducts prospective review and feedback on all inpatient orders of piperacillin–tazobactam and carbapenems. In addition, the team provides non-antibiotic recommendations (i.e. additional investigations and infectious disease reviews). This study aimed to describe the impact of these recommendations on patient outcomes. MethodsPatients on carbapenem and piperacillin–tazobactam who received at least one non-antibiotic recommendation between January 2012 and August 2014 were included in this study. Acceptance and rejection of non-antibiotic recommendations by the managing physician were compared. The primary outcome was 30-d mortality. ResultsNon-antibiotic recommendations were made in 166 patients. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between patients for whom recommendations were accepted and patients for whom recommendations were rejected. Thirty-day mortality (18.0% vs. 34.5%, P = 0.02) was significantly lower in patients who had at least one non-antibiotic recommendation accepted. Multi-variate analysis found that Charlson's comorbidity score [odds ratio (OR) 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03–1.42, P = 0.03], APACHE II score (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01–1.19, P < 0.01), hepatobiliary source of infection (OR 10.19, 95% CI 1.44–72.13, P = 0.02) and acceptance of at least one non-antibiotic recommendation (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17–0.88, P = 0.02) were independently associated with 30-d mortality. ConclusionsDuring prospective review and feedback of piperacillin–tazobactam and carbapenems, acceptance of non-antibiotic recommendations was found to be associated with a reduction in 30-d mortality.

Online Course Improves Nurses’ Knowledge of Antimicrobial Stewardship

Nurses who completed an online training course in antimicrobial stewardship showed increased knowledge about infections in long-term care residents and understanding of the nursing staff’s role in infection control, a small study has found. “Online education targeting nurses and their role in antimicrobial stewardship could be a useful and practical component of comprehensive antimicrobial stewardship programs in nursing homes,” according to study author Robin L.P. Jump, MD, PhD, an assistant professor of medicine in the division of infectious diseases and HIV medicine at Case Western Reserve University, and her coauthors [Am J Infect Control, Feb 8, 2017; doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2017.01.002]. For the study, a free online course covering the fundamentals of antimicrobial stewardship was completed by 103 nurses. The course takers were nearly all women, two-thirds of whom were registered nurses; the rest were largely licensed practicing nurses. Nearly two-thirds worked at community-based nursing home facilities, and well over half had been in the field for more than 10 years. The course comprised six modules, 30 minutes each, covering essential topics in antimicrobial stewardship in long-term care settings: igns and symptoms of infection in older adults; differentiating urinary tract infections from asymptomatic bacteriuria; recognition and evaluation of upper respiratory tract infections, bronchitis, and pneumonia; appropriate application of transmission-based precautions; proper collection of samples for microbiologic culture; and improving communication with providers using SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation). The surveys before and after the course of the participants’ attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge showed they gained confidence in various subjects, particularly how to differentiate urinary tract infections from asymptomatic bacteriuria, and upper respiratory tract infections, bronchitis, and pneumonia. In addition, the mean survey scores on the nurses’ understanding of how their attitudes and interactions with residents and residents’ families directly affected antimicrobial stewardship increased significantly after the course’s completion. Whether a nurse knew the baseline status of a resident and that resident’s antibiotic exposure rose in importance to the course takers, according to the surveys: from a Likert scale score of 3.8 out of 5 to 4.5 for both items. Most respondents supported the strategy of “watchful waiting” to avoid antibiotic prescribing; scores remained constant at 4.1 out of 5. Also unchanged across the pre-course and post-course surveys was the idea that “only vulnerable people acquire multidrug resistant pathogens,” which remained constant at 20 out of 5. The number of correctly answered knowledge-assessment survey questions increased from 75% (9.0 of 12 questions) to 86% (10.4 of 12 questions) across the course takers, especially around recognizing fever in older adults and in catheter-associated urinary tract infection prevention. A knowledge gap persisted, however, about how to properly collect samples for a microbiologic culture. Dr. Jump and her colleagues wrote that as regulatory pressures mount for improved antibiotic stewardship, “nurses will likely become integral members of multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship teams. Antimicrobial stewardship–focused education may increase nurses’ confidence, empower them to help effect changes necessary to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions, and improve the overall care and safety of nursing home residents.” Helen Jones is a NJ-based freelance writer.