Introduction: With increasing diabetic patients, patients with critical limb ischemia requiring distal bypass are increasing. In diabetic patients, severe calcification is common, and if stitch needles for anastomosis are not penetrable, bypass may become unsuccessful. Preoperative information regarding penetrability of needles is very helpful for choosing target segment; however, there have been little studies regarding quantification of calcification for bypass target segment. We performed quantification of calcification by computer tomography (CT) in patients underwent distal artery bypass, and established criteria for feasibility of anastomosis for calcified artery. Methods: After Mar. 2018, 85 patients (mean age 71.8±9.5 years; range 48-91; female 34%; hemodialysis dependent patient 47%) underwent distal bypasses (tibial or peroneal bypasses 21%; para- or infra-malleolar bypass 79%) in our hospital. Of 85, 16 had entire arterial calcification involving target arteries. Before the bypass, arterial segments, with larger caliber and better distal run-off, were selected as first or second-choice target segment for anastomosis, and calcium score of the segments was assessed by Agatston method1): Using multidetector row CT (Revolution CT®, GE Co. USA), 3 dimension configuration of the calcified artery was reconstructed, and 8-10 contiguous slices with a thickness of 2.5 mm each were obtained from about 20mm-long target segment. In each slice, calcified area with CT score≥130 Hounsfield units (HU), and ≥2 pixels was defined to be significant, and the areas were categorized into density scores 1 - 4 depending on CT scores (1 = 130-199, 2 = 200-299, 3 = 300-399, 4 = >399HU), and then, using Ziostation 2®computer software (Zaiosoft co. Japan), Agatston score (AS) for outer half circle area in each slice was calculated by multiplying the density of score and the area (mm2), and presented as 0 (no calcification) to >40 (very severe calcification) (Fig.). Results: Of 85 patients, 16 had entire artery calcification involving target segment, and clampless anastomosis technique was necessary. The target segments were selected by angiography and plain X-P, and their ASs of target segment were obtained before operation. Of 16, 2 had severely calcified target segment, with mean AS 33.4±5.1; range 28.6 - 42.9 (n=12slices), and anastomosis to the first target was unsuccessful. In the remaining14, mean ASs were 16.4±6.2; range 1.0 - 31 (n=132 slices), and most of stitch needles were penetrable without difficulties and anastomosis was successful. As results, anastomosis for calcified segments with AS< 20 was surely possible and needles were penetrable, while anastomosis for segments with ASs between 20 and 30 were feasible and most of needles were penetrable, but exquisite technique was necessary. Arterial target segment with AS >30 was not suitable for anastomosis, and if most of slices in the segment were AS>30, anastomosis target should be changed. Conclusion: In distal bypass to small caliber calcified artery, CT quantitative evaluation using AS clearly discriminated suitable or unsuitable segment for anastomosis. This method was useful to judge feasibility of anastomosis for calcified artery, and suggested that segment with AS under 30 should be chosen as target. Disclosure: Nothing to disclose