Multicenter Propensity Score-matched Study Research Articles

Predictive MINT Pathologic Risk Score for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Resected Cholangiocarcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Multicenter Study in Thailand.

This study aims to clarify the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in resectable cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and develop a predictive risk score for treatment selection. Patients with resected CCA undergoing curative surgery, with or without AC, were identified from three centers in Thailand. Patients with R2 resection and 30 days postoperative death were excluded. Using the largest center as the discovery cohort, we generated propensity score matching (PSM). A predictive model for overall survival (OS) was identified, and a predictive risk score was developed from the PSM discovery cohort, classifying patients into high- and low-risk groups. The proposed risk score was validated in the other two centers. In the discovery cohort, 493 patients were identified. After PSM, 328 patients were categorized into surgery (n = 164) and surgery + AC (n = 164) groups. The baseline characteristics in the PSM discovery cohort were well-balanced. In the validation cohort (n = 83), patients with positive lymph node 1 received AC more frequently than those under observation (47% v 18%; P = .02). A MINT pathologic risk score was developed from multivariate analysis for OS. The score includes margin, perineural invasion, pathologic nodal status, and pathologic tumor size. In the PSM discovery cohort, for the low-risk score group, the surgery group had significantly longer OS compared with the surgery + AC group (49.4 v 31.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 1.78 [95% CI, 1.11 to 2.86]; P = .016). Conversely, for the high-risk score group, the surgery + AC group had better OS than the surgery group (18.8 v 8 months; HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.79]; P < .001). The results were comparable in the validation cohort. Patients with resected CCA with a high-risk MINT pathologic risk score were likely to benefit from AC, whereas those with a low-risk score were not. Further validation in a larger prospective cohort is warranted.

Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Intravenous Thrombolysis in Distal Medium Vessel Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Multinational Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.

The management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to distal medium vessel occlusion (DMVO) remains uncertain, particularly in comparing the effectiveness of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) plus mechanical thrombectomy (MT) versus IVT alone. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy in DMVO patients treated with either MT-IVT or IVT alone. This multinational study analyzed data from 37 centers across North America, Asia, and Europe. Patients with AIS due to DMVO were included, with data collected from September 2017 to July 2023. The primary outcome was functional independence, with secondary outcomes including mortality and safety measures such as types of intracerebral hemorrhage. The study involved 1,057 patients before matching, and 640 patients post-matching. Functional outcomes at 90 days showed no significant difference between groups in achieving good functional recovery (modified Rankin Scale 0-1 and 0-2), with adjusted odds ratios (OR) of 1.21 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81 to 1.79; P=0.35) and 1.00 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.51; P>0.99), respectively. Mortality rates at 90 days were similar between the two groups (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.29; P=0.30). The incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage was comparable, but any type of intracranial hemorrhage was significantly higher in the MT-IVT group (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.63; P<0.001). The results of this study indicate that while MT-IVT and IVT alone show similar functional and mortality outcomes in DMVO patients, MT-IVT presents a higher risk of hemorrhagic complications, thus MT-IVT may not routinely offer additional benefits over IVT alone for all DMVO stroke patients. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to identify patient subgroups most likely to benefit from MT-IVT treatment in DMVO.

Efficacy of the da Vinci robot versus thoracoscopic surgery for patients with mediastinal tumors of different body mass index: a multicenter propensity score-matched study

BackgroundThe purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for the treatment of patients with mediastinal tumors of different body mass indices (BMI).MethodsA retrospective cohort study was used to collect 260 patients with mediastinal tumors admitted to three medical centers in China from December 2020 to March 2024. These patients underwent mediastinal tumor resection by RATS (n = 125) or VATS (n = 135). Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed for the both groups, and further, the patients were divided into the N-BMI group (18.5 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 25 kg/m2) and the H-BMI group (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) based on their BMI to compare patients’ surgery-related information.ResultsThe RATS group had more advantages than the VATS group in terms of intraoperative blood loss, total postoperative drainage, postoperative drainage time, and postoperative hospital stay. As for hospitalization costs, the VATS group was more advantageous. In the H-BMI group, subgroup analysis showed a statistically significant difference in shorter operative time and lower incidence of postoperative complications in the RATS group.ConclusionRATS has technical and short-term efficacy advantages in comparison with VATS, although it has the drawback of high costs associated with the treatment of mediastinal tumors. In the patients with mediastinal tumors of H-BMI, RATS can achieve better short-term outcomes and safety, especially in the reduction of the incidence of postoperative complications.

Efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel-based or S-1 regimens in treating elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A multi-center propensity-score matched study

BackgroundElderly patients with esophageal cancer can benefit from concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). However, the optimal concurrent chemotherapy regimen remains undetermined. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of CCRT with paclitaxel-based or S-1 regimens in treating elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). MethodsFrom January 2016 to November 2022, a total of 349 patients aged 70 and above with ESCC were included. The patient population was divided into two treatment groups: patients receiving paclitaxel-based CCRT were allocated to the TP group, and those receiving S-1 regimen CCRT were allocated to the S-1 group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance potential biases. Survival outcomes, overall response rate, and treatment-related toxicities were assessed. ResultsAfter PSM, there were 82 patients in each group. The median follow up of the surviving patients was 42.6 months (IQR 28.0–58.8 months). The 2-year overall survival (OS) rate (71.4% vs 65.4%; log-rank P = 0.010) and progression-free survival (PFS) rate (64.4% vs 58.0%; log-rank P = 0.048) were significantly higher in the TP group. Compared with the S-1 group, the TP group experienced a higher rate of grade 3 and above hematologic toxicities, such as leukopenia (47.6% vs 15.9%, P < 0.001) and neutropenia (35.4% vs 6.1%, P < 0.001). One patient in the TP group and two patients in the S-1 group had grade 5 toxic effects. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that paclitaxel-based CCRT was well tolerated in elderly patients with ESCC and provided significant survival benefits over S-1 regimen.

Impact of pulmonary vein-first ligation during lobectomy on the postoperative survival and recurrence rates in patients with non-smallcell lung cancer: a multicenter propensity score-matched study.

Surgical manipulation of the lungs increases the number of circulating tumor cells and the subsequent risk of metastasis in patients with lung cancer. This study investigated whether or not ligating the tumor-draining pulmonary vein first during lobectomy could improve the prognosis of these patients. We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent curative lobectomy for solitary nonsmall-cell lung carcinoma between January 2012 and December 2016. We divided the patients into the vein-first group, in which all associated pulmonary veins were dissected and severed before cutting the pulmonary artery, bronchus, or pulmonary fissure, and the other procedure group. Overall, we included 177 and 413 patients in the vein-first and other procedure groups, respectively. Propensity score matching yielded 67 pairs of patients. The 5-year overall survival (85.6% [95% confidence interval, 77.3-94.8%] vs. 69.4% [58.7-81.9%], P = 0.03%) and recurrence-free survival (73.4% [63.3-85.1%] vs. 53.5% [42.5-67.3%], P = 0.02) were significantly better in the vein-first group than in the other procedure group. The cumulative recurrence rate at 5years post-surgery was significantly lower in the vein-first group than in the other procedure group (21.7% vs. 38.3%, P = 0.04). Our study suggests that ligating the pulmonary vein first during lobectomy for lung cancer can improve the overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and cumulative recurrence rate.

Sex-dependent characteristics and outcomes after clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a multicenter propensity score-matched study.

Disparities in the epidemiology and growth rates of aneurysms between the sexes are known. However, little is known about sex-dependent outcomes after microsurgical clipping of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs). The aim of this study was to examine sex differences in characteristics and outcomes after microsurgical clipping of UIAs and to perform a propensity score-matched analysis using an international multicenter cohort. This retrospective cohort study involved the participation of 15 centers spanning four continents. It included adult patients who underwent clipping of UIAs between January 2016 and December 2020. Patients were stratified according to their sex and analyzed for differences in morbidities and aneurysm characteristics. Based on this stratification, female patients were matched to male patients in a 1:1 ratio with a caliper width of 0.1 using propensity score matching. Endpoints included postoperative complications, neurological performance, and aneurysm occlusion at discharge and 24 months after clip placement. A total of 2245 patients with a mean age of 57.3 (range 20-87) years were included. Of these patients, 1675 (74.6%) were female. Female patients were significantly older (mean 57.6 vs 56.4 years, p = 0.03) but had fewer comorbidities. Aneurysms of the internal carotid artery (7.1% vs 4.2%), posterior communicating artery (6.9% vs 1.9%), and ophthalmic artery (6.0% vs 2.8%) were more commonly treated surgically in females, while clipping of aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery was more frequent in males (17.0% vs 25.3%; all p < 0.001). After propensity score matching, female patients were found to have had significantly fewer pulmonary complications (1.4% vs 4.2%, p = 0.01). However, general morbidity (24.5% vs 25.2%, p = 0.72) and mortality (0.5% vs 1.1%, p = 0.34), as well as neurological performance (p = 0.58), were comparable at discharge in both sexes. Lastly, rates of aneurysm occlusion at the time of discharge (95.5% vs 94.9%, p = 0.71) and 24 months after surgery (93.8% vs 96.1%, p = 0.22) did not significantly differ between male and female patients. Despite overall differences between male and female patients in demographics, comorbidities, and treated aneurysm location, sex did not relevantly affect surgical performance or perioperative complication rates.

Local Excision Versus Radical Resection for Grade 2 Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Studies on grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors are limited, and the optimal treatment for these tumors is not well established. We aimed to compare the oncologic results of local excision versus radical resection for the treatment of grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors. Retrospective multicenter propensity score-matched study to minimize heterogeneity between groups and focus on the differences between surgery strategies. Seventeen large-scale Chinese medical centers participated in this study. A total of 144 patients with pathologically confirmed grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors were retrospectively analyzed. Cancer-specific survival and relapse-free survival were assessed to compare surgery strategies. A total of 144 patients with grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors were enrolled in this study. Twenty-seven patients underwent endoscopic resection, 55 underwent transanal excision, 50 underwent radical resection, and 12 underwent palliative surgery or biopsy for distant metastasis. Of the 50 patients who underwent radical resection, 30 (60.0%) had clinically positive lymph nodes on the basis of the histopathology results. The optimal cutoff value for tumor size to predict cancer-specific survival was 1.5 cm. In patients with grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors of ≤1.5-cm size, there were no significant differences in cancer-specific survival and relapse-free survival between local excision and radical resection groups ( p > 0.05). In patients with grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors of >1.5-cm size, relapse-free survival was significantly lower in the local excision group than in the radical resection group ( p = 0.04). The nature of retrospective reviews and a relatively short follow-up period are limitations of this study. Grade 2 rectal neuroendocrine tumors have a nonnegligible rate of lymph node metastasis. Local excision is a feasible choice for tumors of ≤1.5 cm size without metastasis, whereas radical resection is more beneficial in those of >1.5 cm size. See Video Abstract . ANTECEDENTES:Los estudios sobre los tumores neuroendocrinos rectales de grado 2 son limitados y el tratamiento óptimo para estos tumores no está bien establecido.OBJETIVO:Comparar los resultados oncológicos de la escisión local versus la resección radical para el tratamiento de tumores neuroendocrinos rectales grado 2.DISEÑO:Estudio multicéntrico retrospectivo emparejado por puntuación de propensión para minimizar la heterogeneidad entre grupos y centrarse en la diferencia entre estrategias quirúrgicas.ESCENARIO:Diecisiete centros médicos chinos de gran tamaño participaron en este estudio.PACIENTES:Se analizaron retrospectivamente un total de 144 pacientes con tumores neuroendocrinos rectales grado 2 patológicamente confirmados.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se evaluaron la supervivencia específica del cáncer y la supervivencia libre de recaída para comparar las estrategias quirúrgicas.RESULTADOS:En este estudio se inscribieron un total de 144 pacientes con tumores neuroendocrinos rectales grado 2. Veintisiete pacientes se sometieron a resección endoscópica, 55 a escisión transanal, 50 a resección radical y 12 a cirugía paliativa o biopsia por metástasis a distancia. De los 50 pacientes que se sometieron a resección radical, 30 (60,0%) tenían ganglios linfáticos clínicamente positivos según los resultados histopatológicos. El valor de corte óptimo para el tamaño del tumor para predecir la supervivencia específica del cáncer fue de 1,5 cm. En pacientes con tumores neuroendocrinos rectales grado 2 ≤ 1,5 cm, no hubo diferencias significativas en la supervivencia específica del cáncer y la supervivencia libre de recaída entre los grupos de escisión local y resección radical ( p >0,05). En pacientes con tumores neuroendocrinos rectales grado 2 > 1,5 cm, la supervivencia libre de recaída fue significativamente menor en el grupo de escisión local que en el grupo de resección radical ( p = 0,04).LIMITACIONES:La naturaleza de la revisión retrospectiva y el período de seguimiento relativamente corto son limitaciones de este estudio.CONCLUSIONES:Los tumores neuroendocrinos rectales grado 2 tienen una tasa no despreciable de metástasis en los ganglios linfáticos. La escisión local es una opción factible para tumores ≤ 1,5 cm sin metástasis, mientras que la resección radical es más beneficiosa en aquellos > 1,5 cm. (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio ).

Comparison of mortality rates in patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales bacteremia according to carbapenemase production: a multicenter propensity-score matched study

The spread of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) poses a public health threat worldwide. We aimed to compare the mortality rates between the carbapenemase-producing (CP) and non-CP CRE bacteremia. We conducted a retrospective cohort study in patients with CRE bacteremia after propensity score (PS) matching. We performed a Kaplan–Meier curve analysis to identify the cumulative hazard for 30-day mortality. There were 318 patients with CRE between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022. There were 252 patients with CP-CRE and 66 with non-CP-RE, respectively. Before PS matching, the 30-day mortality rates were 40.9% in the non-CP-CRE group and 53.2% in the CP-CRE group (p = 0.097). In patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), the mortality rates were 49.0% in the non-CP-CRE group and 57.1% in the CP-CRE group (p = 0.340). After PS matching, the hazard ratio (HR) for mortality in the CP-CRE group was 1.49 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74–3.03), p = 0.266). In ICU patients, the HR of CP-CRE was 1.11 (95% CI 0.36–3.39, p = 0.860). The Kaplan–Meier curve for 30-day mortality showed no difference in cumulative hazard. After PS matching, there was no difference in 30-day mortality between patients with CP-CRE and non-CP-CRE bacteremia.

Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection in various settings: an international multicenter propensity score-matched study of 10,075 patients

Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection in various settings: an international multicenter propensity score-matched study of 10,075 patients

Aspirin exposure and its association with metal stent patency in malignant distal biliary obstruction: a large international multicenter propensity score–matched study

Background and AimsStent dysfunction is common following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) insertion in malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO). Chronic aspirin exposure (ASA-E) has been previously shown to potentially decrease this risk. We aim to further ascertain the protective effect of ASA and to identify other predictors of stent dysfunction. MethodMulticenter retrospective cohort study (9 Canada and 1 US). MDBO who underwent ERCP-SEMS between 01/2014-12/2019 were included and divided into two cohorts: ASA-E and ASA unexposed (ASA-U). Propensity score-matching (PSM) was performed to limit selection bias. Matched variables included: age, sex, tumor stage, and type of metal stent. The primary outcome was the hazard rate of stent dysfunction. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent predictors of stent dysfunction. Results1,396 patients were assessed. Following PSM a total of 496 patients were analyzed (248 ASA-E, 248 ASA-U). ERCP-SEMS was associated with high clinical success of 82.2% in ASA-E and 81.2% in ASA-U, p=0.80. A total of 184 patients had stent dysfunction wth a mean stent patency time of 229.9 ± 306.2 days and 245.4 ± 241.4 days in ASA-E and ASA-U, resepectively (p=0.52). On multivariable analysis, ASA-E did not protect against stent dysfunction with a hazard ratio of 1.25 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.96; 1.63). Pancreatic cancer etiology (HR 1.36, 95% CI:1.15-1.61) predicted stent dysfunction while cancer therapy was protective (HR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.55; 0.96). The use of chronic ASA was not associated with an increased risk for adverse events including bleeding, post-ERCP pancreatitis, and perforation. ConclusionIn this large, multicenter study utilizing propensity score-matching, chronic exposure to ASA did not protect against stent dysfunction in MDBO. Instead, the analysis revealed that the etiology of pancreatic cancer was an independent predictor of stent dysfunction while cancer therapy was protective.

Combining brushing cytology with simultaneous vacuum aspiration in suspicious biliopancreatic malignancies: A multicenter propensity score-matched study (with video)

BackgroundBrush cytology during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a standard approach in diagnosing biliopancreatic strictures, with yet unsatisfying sensitivity. AimsWe brought additional simultaneous vacuum aspiration to brushing process and re-evaluate the diagnostic performance. MethodsThis multi-centered retrospective study was conducted in three tertiary centers. Consecutive patients with biliopancreatic strictures were identified. The patients were divided into two arms: the conventional arm (CA) receiving general brushing approach, and the modified arm (MA) being treated with additional vacuum aspiration when performing bushing. The 1:1 propensity-score matching was implemented to tackle the selective biases. ResultsA total of 555 patients were identified and 200 patient pairs (193 males, 207 females, with a mean age of 68.1 ± 13.1 years.) fell into the ultimate evaluation. A final diagnosis of malignant stricture was established in 243 patients. The diagnostic yield of the MA group was substantially better than that of the CA group, whether "suspicious malignancies" were considered malignancies or not. The rates of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 46.2%, 100%, 68.0% in the MA group, and 15.3%, 98.7%, and 47.0% in the CA group respectively. ConclusionsBrushing accompanied by simultaneous vacuum aspiration at ERCP improves the diagnostic yield in suspicious biliopancreatic malignancies.

Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy and McKeown Esophagectomy for Middle and Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.

We compared the perioperative efficacy and safety of da Vinci robot-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and McKeown esophagectomy for middle and lower thoracic esophageal cancer. A retrospective case-control study method was used. A total of 181 patients with esophageal cancer admitted to three medical centers in China from February 2018 to October 2022 were collected and divided into two groups according to surgical method: da Vinci robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (Ivor Lewis group) and RATS McKeown esophagectomy (McKeown group), respectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to reduce selection bias caused by confounding factors. The perioperative indicators of the two groups were compared and analyzed. There was a statistically significant difference in age and tumor location between the Ivor Lewis group and the McKeown group. After PSM, the above factors were no longer statistically significant. There were 80 patients in each group after PSM. In terms of operative time (P = 0.005), anastomotic leakage (P = 0.029), and pulmonary infection (P = 0.035), the Ivor Lewis group has significant advantages; in terms of the number of lymph nodes dissected around the recurrent laryngeal nerve (P = 0.010), the McKeown group has significant advantages. Both RATS Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and McKeown esophagectomy are safe and effective for treatment of middle and lower thoracic esophageal cancer. Ivor Lewis has advantages in operative time, anastomotic leakage, and pulmonary infection, while McKeown has advantage in lymph node dissection around the recurrent laryngeal nerve.

Favipiravir treatment in non-severe COVID-19: promising results from multicenter propensity score-matched study (FAVICOV)

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of favipiravir (FPV) in preventing the development of severe COVID-19 in patients with mild-to-moderate symptoms. The study evaluated 1037 COVID-19 patients treated with FPV or standard treatment between April and September 2021, analyzed by propensity score matching. 149 patients were included in each arm after propensity score matching. The clinical outcomes showed no deterioration of the WHO clinical progression scale in the FPV group compared to the standard treatment group on day 5 (83.2% vs. 69.1%, p < 0.001). The WHO clinical progression scale also showed improvements on day 14 in the FPV group compared to the standard treatment group (66.4% vs. 46.3%, p < 0.001). The rates of oxygen supplementation and hospitalization were significantly lower in the FPV group compared to the standard treatment group (0% vs. 12.1% and 0.7% vs. 17.4%, respectively, p < 0.001 for both). There were no differences in adverse events between the two groups. The study highlights the effectiveness of FPV in preventing severe COVID-19 and hospitalization in patients with mild-to-moderate symptoms. The findings emphasize the importance of personalized treatment plans for COVID-19 patients, starting FPV treatment early, and adjusting dosages based on ethnicity and body weight.

ASO Visual Abstract: Efficacy and Quality of Life of Modified Versus Traditional Thoraco-Laparoscopic McKeown Procedure for Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.

ASO Visual Abstract: Efficacy and Quality of Life of Modified Versus Traditional Thoraco-Laparoscopic McKeown Procedure for Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Efficacy and Quality of Life with the Modified Versus the Traditional Thoraco-Laparoscopic McKeown Procedure for Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and postoperative quality of life for patients with esophageal cancer treated by either the modified or the traditional thoracolaparoscopic McKeown procedure. This retrospective case-control study included 269 patients with esophageal cancer admitted to three medical centers in China from February 2020 to August 2022. The patients were divided according to surgical method into the layered hand-sewn end-to-end invagination anastomosis group (modified group) and the traditional hand anastomosis group (traditional group). Propensity score-matching (PSM) was used to maintain balance and comparability between the two groups. The differences in age and tumor location between the patients in the traditional and modified groups were statistically significant. After PSM, the aforementioned factors were statistically insignificant. After PSM, each group had 101 patients. The modified group showed the greater advantage in terms of postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.036), incidence of anastomotic leak (P = 0.009), and incidence of gastroesophageal reflux (P < 0.001), and the difference was statistically significant. The results of the Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and Quality of Life Questionnaire Oesophageal Cancer Module 18 (QLQ-OES18) scales showed that the modified group also had the advantage over the traditional group in terms of physical function, overall health status, loss of appetite, eating, reflux, obstruction, and loss of appetite scores at the first and third months after surgery. The modified thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown procedure is a safe and effective surgical approach that can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leak and gastroesophageal reflux, shorten the postoperative hospital stay, and improve the postoperative quality of life for patients with esophageal cancer.

Remote monitoring of implantable loop recorders reduces time to diagnosis in patients with unexplained syncope: a multicenter propensity score-matched study.

There are little data on remote monitoring (RM) of implantable loop recorders (ILRs) in patients with unexplained syncope and whether it confers enhanced diagnostic power. To evaluate the effect of RM in ILR recipients for unexplained syncope for early detection of clinically relevant arrhythmias by comparison with a historical cohort with no RM. SyncRM is a propensity score (PS)-matched study prospectively including 133 consecutive patients with unexplained syncope and ILR followed up by RM (RM-ON group). A historical cohort of 108 consecutive ILR patients with biannual in-hospital follow-up visits was used as control group (RM-OFF group). The primary endpoint was the time to the clinician's evaluation of clinically relevant arrhythmias (types 1, 2, and 4 of the ISSUE classification). The primary endpoint of arrhythmia evaluation was reached in 38 patients (28.6%) of the RM-ON group after a median time of 46 days (interquartile range, 13-106) and in 22 patients (20.4%) of the RM-OFF group after 92 days (25-368). The PS-matched adjusted ratio of rates of arrhythmia evaluation was 2.53 (95% confidence interval, 1.32-4.86) in the RM-ON vs. RM-OFF group (p = 0.005). In our PS-matched comparison with a historical cohort, RM of ILR patients with unexplained syncope was associated with a 2.5-fold higher chance of evaluations of clinically relevant arrhythmias as compared with biannual in-office follow-up visits.

Prediction values of tertiary lymphoid structures in the prognosis of patients with left- and right-sided colon cancer: a multicenter propensity score-matched study.

Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) are the lymphocyte aggregates that play a key role in the vast majority of solid tumors including colon cancer, displaying an antitumor effect under most circumstances. The heterogeneity between left- and right-sided colon cancer (LCC and RCC) encompasses various aspects, such as clinical manifestations, pathological features, and immune responses. However, the function and prognostic significance of TLS within LCC and RCC have yet to be fully understood. A retrospective analysis was performed on 2612 patients who underwent radical resection for LCC or RCC without distant metastasis in multiple medical centers. Utilizing propensity score matching, 121 patients with LCC and 121 patients with RCC were selected for the training set. An external validation set including 64 patients with LCC and 64 patients with RCC were also employed. Hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemical staining were used to assess TLS and the proportion of various immune cells. Clinical characteristics and prognostic values of TLS in patients with LCC and RCC were analyzed. Nomograms were constructed for LCC and RCC to predict 3-year and 5-year overall survival (OS), respectively. For LCC and RCC patients, TLS was located in the interstitial region or outside the tumor tissue and mainly consisted of B cells and T cells. The TLS quantity and density in RCC were higher than those of LCC. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, TLS density ( P =0.014), vascular invasion ( P =0.019), and AJCC stage ( P =0.026) were independent prognostic factors for 5-year OS of RCC. For LCC patients, AJCC stage ( P =0.024), tumor differentiation ( P =0.001), and tumor budding ( P =0.040) emerged as independent prognostic factors for 5-year OS. Similar results were obtained in the external verification set. Separate nomograms for RCC and LCC were developed, displaying improved prediction performance compared to the AJCC 8th edition TNM staging system. Differences in TLS quantity and density were observed between LCC and RCC, suggesting that a nomogram based on TLS density could more effectively predict survival for RCC patients. Furthermore, a nomogram based on tumor budding was recommended for better prediction of LCC patient survival. Taken together, these results suggested that the immune and clinical characteristics of colon cancer at left and right side were substantially different, which may lead to the use of different prediction model and the development of individual treatment strategy.

The effect of oseltamivir use in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A multicenter propensity score-matched study

BackgroundOseltamivir has been used as adjunctive therapy in the management of patients with COVID-19. However, the evidence about using oseltamivir in critically ill patients with severe COVID-19 remains scarce. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of oseltamivir in critically ill patients with COVID-19. MethodsThis multicenter, retrospective cohort study includes critically ill adult patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Patients were categorized into two groups based on oseltamivir use within 48 hours of ICU admission (Oseltamivir vs. Control). The primary endpoint was viral load clearance. ResultsA total of 226 patients were matched into two groups based on their propensity score. The time to COVID-19 viral load clearance was shorter in patients who received oseltamivir (11 vs. 16 days, p = 0.042; beta coefficient: −0.84, 95%CI: (−1.33, 0.34), p = 0.0009). Mechanical ventilation (MV) duration was also shorter in patients who received oseltamivir (6.5 vs. 8.5 days, p = 0.02; beta coefficient: −0.27, 95% CI: [−0.55,0.02], P = 0.06). In addition, patients who received oseltamivir had lower odds of hospital/ventilator-acquired pneumonia (OR:0.49, 95% CI:(0.283,0.861), p = 0.01). On the other hand, there were no significant differences between the groups in the 30-day and in-hospital mortality. ConclusionOseltamivir was associated with faster viral clearance and shorter MV duration without safety concerns in critically ill COVID-19 patients.

The Wait Time for Surgery Following Injury Affects Functional Outcomes and Complications After an Ankle Fracture: A Propensity Score-Matched Multicenter Study, the TRON Study.

The present study aimed to evaluate the hypothesis that a 1-week extension of the waiting period to perform surgery for ankle fracture might affect postoperative results and complications. We used our multicenter database named TRON (Trauma Research Group of Nagoya). In all, 779 patients who underwent surgery for ankle fracture, who had no comorbidities were eligible. After exclusion, we analyzed 596 patients. We divided the patients into 2 groups according to whether they were operated on within 7 days after the injury with propensity score matching. The operative time of the delayed operation group (DO group) was significantly longer than that of the early operation group (EO group) (115.87 ± 56.59 vs 85.93 ± 34.58 minutes; P < .001). The rate of infection in the DO group was significantly higher than that of the EO group (16 patients [6.5%] vs 4 patients [1.6%]; P = .016). Waiting for more than a week to perform ankle surgery may lead to longer operative times and increased infection rates. III.

Stratified Analysis of Survival Benefit for ABO-incompatible Deceased-donor Liver Transplantation: Multicenter Propensity Score-matched Study.

Liver transplantation (LT) using ABO-incompatible (ABOi) grafts can extend the donor pool to a certain extent and hence reduce the waiting time for transplantation. However, concerns of the impending prognosis associated with this option, especially for patients with liver failure and higher model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores, who tend to be more fragile during the waiting period before LT. Recipients undergoing LT for acute-on-chronic liver failure or acute liver failure were retrospectively enrolled at four institutions. Overall survival was compared and a Cox regression analysis was performed. Propensity score matching was performed for further comparison. Patients were stratified by MELD score and cold ischemia time (CIT) to determine the subgroups with survival benefits. Two hundred ten recipients who underwent ABOi LT and 1,829 who underwent ABO compatible (ABOc) LT were enrolled. The 5-year overall survival rate was significantly inferior in the ABOi group compared with the ABOc group after matching (50.6% vs. 75.7%, p<0.05). For patients with MELD scores ≤30, using ABOi grafts achieved a comparable overall survival rate as using ABOc grafts (p>0.05). Comparison of the survival rates revealed no statistically significant difference for patients with MELD scores ≥40 (p>0.05). For patients with MELD scores of 31-39, the overall survival rate was significantly inferior in the ABOi group compared with the ABOc group (p<0.001); however, the rate was increased when the liver graft CIT was<8 h. For recipients with MELD scores ≤30, ABOi LT had a prognosis comparable to that of ABOc LT and can be regarded as a feasible option. For recipients with MELD scores ≥40, ABOi should be adopted with caution in emergency cases. For recipients with MELD scores of 31-39, the ABOi LT prognosis was worse. However, those patients benefited from receiving ABOi grafts with a CIT of <8 h.