Multirod Constructs Research Articles

Multirod posterior occipitocervical instrumentation constructs: a biomechanical analysis and initial case series of 10 patients with complex craniocervical pathology

BACKGROUND CONTEXTStabilization of the occipitocervical (OC) junction with posterior instrumentation plays a vital role in addressing a spectrum of pathologies. Due to limited bone surfaces of the occiput and C1 lamina, achieving union across the OC junction is challenging. PURPOSETo explore the biomechanics and a clinical series of patients treated with multirod constructs across the OC junction using a novel occipital plate with single- and dual-headed, modular tulip heads. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGBiomechanical analysis and retrospective case series. PATIENT SAMPLEAdults at a single institution who underwent posterior cervical multirod constructs across the OC junction. OUTCOME MEASURESOC–C4 range of motion (ROM), maximum von Mises stress on the rods, and adjacent segment ROMs and intradiscal parameters. Patient demographics, revision operations, rod breakages, wound complications. METHODSA validated occiput-cervical finite element (FE) model was used to simulate OC–C4 cervical fixation under multidirectional pure moment loading. A total of 4 rod configurations were simulated: (A) 2-rod-Ti (4.0 mm titanium rods); (B) 2-rod-CoCr (3.5 mm cobalt chrome rods); (C) 3-rods (4.0 mm titanium rods); (D) 4-rods (4.0 mm titanium rods). The aforementioned measures were compared. A retrospective analysis was also performed of adults at a single institution who underwent posterior cervical multirod constructs across the OC junction. RESULTSBiomechanically, lowest primary rod stresses were observed for 3- and 4-rod constructs. Compared to 2-rod-Ti (121.8 MPa), 2-rod-CoCr showed a 43.2% stress increase in the rods, while 3- and 4-rods experienced rod stress reductions of 20% and 23.2%, respectively. No appreciable differences in OC–C4 ROM, C4–5 ROM, and C4–5 discal stresses were found between multirod and 2-rod constructs. Maximum occipital and C4 screw stresses were decreased in multirod constructs compared to 2-rods, with least stresses noted in the 4-rod construct. Maximum plate stresses were slightly increased in the 4-rod construct compared to 2- and 3-rod fixation, though the forces were largely similar among the constructs. Ten patients (average age 66.4±10.6 years; 8 males) were assessed clinically. Nine of the ten operations were for primary stabilization of pathological fractures and associated craniocervical and/or atlantoaxial instability using 4-rods across the OC junction. At an average follow-up time of 1.58±0.5 years (range, 1–2.3 years), there were no instrumentation failures, no adjacent segment failures, and no wound complications. CONCLUSIONSIn this proof-of-concept investigation, multiple rods (3- and 4-rods) across the OC junction using a novel occipital plate with single- and dual-headed, modular tulips was safe and effective in stabilizing the OC junction. Accompanying FE analysis demonstrated that multirod constructs decreased primary rod stresses and had lower stresses on occipital and C4 screws compared to 2-rod constructs, while occipital plate stresses were largely similar. Additional clinical studies are needed to confirm these findings and to determine the ultimate utility of multirod constructs across the OC junction.

Effects of pelvic fixation strategies and multi-rod constructs on biomechanics of the proximal junction in long thoracolumbar posterior instrumented fusions: a finite-element analysis.

To assess the effect of various pelvic fixation techniques and number of rods on biomechanics of the proximal junction of long thoracolumbar posterior instrumented fusions. A validated spinopelvic finite-element (FE) model was instrumented with L5-S1 ALIF and one of the following 9 posterior instrumentation configurations: (A) one traditional iliac screw bilaterally ("2 Iliac/2 Rods"); (B) T10 to S1 ("Sacral Only"); (C) unilateral traditional iliac screw ("1 Iliac/2 Rods"); (D) one traditional iliac screw bilaterally with one midline accessory rod ("2 Iliac/3 rods"); (E) S2AI screws connected directly to the midline rods ("2 S2AI/2 Rods"); and two traditional iliac screws bilaterally with two lateral accessory rods connected to the main rods at varying locations (F1: T10-11, F2: T11-12, F3: T12-L1, F4: L1-2) ("4 Iliac/4 Rods"). Range of motions (ROM) at T10-S1 and T9-T10 were recorded and compared between models. The T9-T10 intradiscal pressures and stresses of the T9-10 disc's annulus in addition to the von Mises stresses of the T9 and T10 vertebral bodies were recorded and compared. For T10-S1 ROM, 4 iliac/4 rods had lowest ROM in flexion and extension, while 2 S2AI/2 rods showed lowest ROM in rotation. Constructs with 3 or 4 rods had lower stresses on the primary rods compared to 2-rod constructs. At the proximal adjacent disc (T9-10), 4 iliac/4 rods showed lowest ROM, lowest intradiscal pressures, and lowest annular stress in all directions (most pronounced in flexion-extension). Under flexion and extension, 4 iliac/4 rods also showed the lowest von Mises stresses on the T10 vertebral body but the highest stresses on the T9 vertebral body. Dual iliac screws with 4 rods across the lumbosacral junction and extending to the thoracolumbar junction demonstrated the lowest T10-S1 ROM, the lowest adjacent segment disc (T9-T10) ROM, intradiscal pressures, and annular stresses, and the lowest UIV stresses, albeit with the highest UIV + 1 stresses. Additional studies are needed to confirm whether these biomechanical findings dictate clinical outcomes and effect rates of proximal junctional kyphosis and failure.

Application of Multi-Rod Constructs for the Revision of Thoracolumbar Fractures.

The revision procedure for failure of internal fixation after thoracolumbar fracture is controversial. Combined anterior and posterior surgery is associated with higher risk more intraoperative bleeding and tissue damage. The success rate of simple anterior surgery needs further confirmation, and posterior surgery lacks stability of internal fixation. This study evaluates the feasibility and surgical effect of multi-rod constructs in the revision of thoracolumbar fractures. Eleven patients with thoracolumbar fractures who underwent previous construct failure and were treated with revision and internal fixation with the multi-rod technique from March 2017 to September 2018 were analyzed. The original internal fixation was removed and replaced in the medial insertion of satellite rods and bone graft. The average follow-up time was 15.97 months. The intraoperation blood loss, the time of the operation, activation and discharge and the rate of rod fracture were calculated. The sagittal Cobb angle before revision, after revision and at the last follow-up were compared. The clinical effect was evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire (ODI). The average operation time was 107 min, the intraoperative blood loss was 131.81 mL, the active time was 1.59 days, and the discharge time was 10.89 days. No rod fractured again during the follow-up period. The paired t-test was used to compare the Cobb angle, VAS score, and ODI before and after surgery. There was significant difference in the sagittal Cobb angle between the pre-revision and the posterior sagittal position (p = 0.000), and no significant difference was found between post-revision and last follow-up (p = 0.551). VAS and ODI were greatly improved at the last follow-up. The literature on revision of thoracolumbar fractures is insufficient and comprises varying opinions. This paper proposes a new treatment option. The application of the multi-rod constructs in the revision of thoracolumbar fractures is safe, simple, and effective and might provide guidance for future clinical work.

T1 Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy With Subaxial Cervical Pedicle Screw Fixation.

Patients suffering from ankylosing spondylitis are not only predisposed to the development of rigid cervicothoracic deformities but are also at an increased risk of cervical fractures. Deformity correction and stabilization are particularly challenging in this patient population due to the brittle bone quality and low bone mineral density. Thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy is a workhorse approach for the correction of focal severe kyphotic deformity with lower complication rates than 3-column osteotomy. Successful execution of an upper thoracic PSO requires careful presurgical planning as well as anticipation of the patient's postoperative needs. Here, we describe the use of a T1 PSO in the correction of a rigid cervicothoracic chin-on-chest deformity in a patient with AS. The risk of implant failure was reduced by the use of a multi-rod construct, navigated cervical pedicle screws, and dual-pitched thoracic pedicle screws.

Biomechanical evaluation of multi-rod constructs to stabilize an S1 pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO): a finite element analysis.

To develop and validate a finite element (FE) model of a sacral pedicle subtraction osteotomy (S1-PSO) and to compare biomechanical properties of various multi-rod configurations to stabilize S1-PSOs. A previously validated FE spinopelvic model was used to develop a 30° PSO at the sacrum. Five multi-rod techniques spanning the S1-PSO were made using 4 iliac screws and a variety of primary rods (PR) and accessory rods (AR; lateral: Lat-AR or medial: Med-AR). All constructs, except one, utilized a horizontal rod (HR) connecting the iliac bolts to which PRs and Med-ARs were connected. Lat-ARs were connected to proximal iliac bolts. The simulation was performed in two steps with the acetabula fixed. For each model, PSO ROM and maximum stress on the PRs, ARs, and HRs were recorded and compared. The maximum stress on the L5-S1 disc and the PSO forces were captured and compared. Highest PSO ROMs were observed for 4-Rods (HR + 2 Med-AR). Constructs consisting of 5-Rods (HR + 2 Lat-ARs + 1 Med-AR) and 6-Rods (HR + 2 Lat-AR + 2 Med-AR) had the lowest PSO ROM. The least stress on the primary rods was seen with 6-Rods, followed by 5-Rods and 4-Rods (HR + 2 Lat-ARs). Lowest PSO forces and lowest L5-S1 disc stresses were observed for 4-Rod (Lat-AR), 5-Rod, and 6-Rod constructs, while 4-Rods (HR + Med-AR) had the highest. In this first FE analysis of an S1-PSO, the 4-Rod construct (HR + Med-AR) created the least rigid environment and highest PSO forces anteriorly. While 5- and 6-Rods created the stiffest constructs and lowest stresses on the primary rods, it also jeopardized load transfer to the anterior column, which may not be favorable for healing anteriorly. A balance between the construct's rigidity and anterior load sharing is essential.

Use of multiple rods and proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity surgery.

Multiple rods are utilized in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery to increase construct stiffness. However, the impact of multiple rods on proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is not well established. This study aimed to investigate the impact of multiple rods on PJK incidence in ASD patients. ASD patients from a prospective multicenter database with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical and radiographic data were collected preoperatively, at 6 weeks postoperatively, at 6 months postoperatively, at 1 year postoperatively, and at every subsequent year postoperatively. PJK was defined as a kyphotic increase of > 10° in the Cobb angle from the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) to UIV+2 as compared with preoperative values. Demographic data, radiographic parameters, and PJK incidence were compared between the multirod and dual-rod patient cohorts. PJK-free survival analysis was performed using Cox regression to control for demographic characteristics, comorbidities, level of fusion, and radiographic parameters. Overall, 307/1300 (23.62%) cases utilized multiple rods. Cases with multiple rods were more likely to be revisions (68.4% vs 46.5%, p < 0.001), to be posterior only (80.7% vs 61.5%, p < 0.001), involve more levels of fusion (mean 11.73 vs 10.60, p < 0.001), and include 3-column osteotomy (42.9% vs 17.1%, p < 0.001). Patients with multiple rods also had greater preoperative pelvic retroversion (mean pelvic tilt 27.95° vs 23.58°, p < 0.001), greater thoracolumbar junction kyphosis (-15.9° vs -11.9°, p = 0.001), and more severe sagittal malalignment (C7-S1 sagittal vertical axis 99.76 mm vs 62.23 mm, p < 0.001), all of which corrected postoperatively. Patients with multiple rods had similar incidence rates of PJK (58.6% vs 58.1%) and revision surgery (13.0% vs 17.7%). The PJK-free survival analysis demonstrated equivalent PJK-free survival durations among the patients with multiple rods (HR 0.889, 95% CI 0.745-1.062, p = 0.195) after controlling for demographic and radiographic parameters. Further stratification based on implant metal type demonstrated noninferior PJK incidence rates with multiple rods in the titanium (57.1% vs 54.6%, p = 0.858), cobalt chrome (60.5% vs 58.7%, p = 0.646), and stainless steel (20% vs 63.7%, p = 0.008) cohorts. Multirod constructs for ASD are most frequently utilized in revision, long-level reconstructions with 3-column osteotomy. The use of multiple rods in ASD surgery does not result in an increased incidence of PJK and is not affected by rod metal type.

Biomechanical evaluation of multiple pelvic screws and multirod construct for the augmentation of lumbosacral junction in long spinal fusion surgery.

Background: Posterior long spinal fusion was the common procedure for adult spinal deformity (ASD). Although the application of sacropelvic fixation (SPF), the incidence of pseudoarthrosis and implant failure is still high in long spinal fusion extending to lumbosacral junction (LSJ). To address these mechanical complications, advanced SPF technique by multiple pelvic screws or multirod construct has been recommended. This was the first study to compare the biomechanical performance of combining multiple pelvic screws and multirod construct to other advanced SPF constructs for the augmentation of LSJ in long spinal fusion surgery through finite element (FE) analysis. Methods: An intact lumbopelvic FE model based on computed tomography images of a healthy adult male volunteer was constructed and validated. The intact model was modified to develop five instrumented models, all of which had bilateral pedicle screw (PS) fixation from L1 to S1 with posterior lumbar interbody fusion and different SPF constructs, including No-SPF, bilateral single S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screw and single rod (SS-SR), bilateral multiple S2AI screws and single rod (MS-SR), bilateral single S2AI screw and multiple rods (SS-MR), and bilateral multiple S2AI screws and multiple rods (MS-MR). The range of motion (ROM) and stress on instrumentation, cages, sacrum, and S1 superior endplate (SEP) in flexion (FL), extension (EX), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) were compared among models. Results: Compared with intact model and No-SPF, the ROM of global lumbopelvis, LSJ, and sacroiliac joint (SIJ) was decreased in SS-SR, MS-SR, SS-MR, and MS-MR in all directions. Compared with SS-SR, the ROM of global lumbopelvis and LSJ of MS-SR, SS-MR, and MS-MR further decreased, while the ROM of SIJ was only decreased in MS-SR and MS-MR. The stress on instrumentation, cages, S1-SEP, and sacrum decreased in SS-SR, compared with no-SPF. Compared with SS-SR, the stress in EX and AR further decreased in SS-MR and MS-SR. The most significantly decreased ROM and stress were observed in MS-MR. Conclusion: Both multiple pelvic screws and multirod construct could increase the mechanical stability of LSJ and reduce stress on instrumentation, cages, S1-SEP, and sacrum. The MS-MR construct was the most adequate to reduce the risk of lumbosacral pseudarthrosis, implant failure, and sacrum fracture. This study may provide surgeons with important evidence for the application of MS-MR construct in the clinical settings.

A Dual-Screw Technique for Vertebral Compression Fractures via Robotic Navigation in the Osteopenic Lumbar Spine: An In-Vitro Biomechanical Analysis.

Biomechanical cadaveric study. Multi-rod constructs maximize posterior fixation, but most use a single pedicle screw (PS) anchor point to support multiple rods. Robotic navigation allows for insertion of PS and cortical screw (CS) within the same pedicle, providing 4 points of bony fixation per vertebra. Recent studies demonstrated radiographic feasibility for dual-screw constructs for posterior lumbar spinal fixation; however, biomechanical characterization of this technique is lacking. Fourteen cadaveric lumbar specimens (L1-L5) were divided into 2 groups (n = 7): PS, and PS + CS. VCF was simulated at L3. Bilateral posterior screws were placed from L2-L4. Load control (±7.5Nm) testing performed in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), axial rotation (AR) to measure ROM of: (1) intact; (2) 2-rod construct; (3) 4-rod construct. Static compression testing of 4-rod construct performed at 5mm/min to measure failure load, axial stiffness. Four-rod construct was more rigid than 2-rod in FE (P < .001), LB (P < .001), AR (P < .001). Screw technique had no significant effect on FE (P = .516), LB (P = .477), or AR (P = .452). PS + CS 4-rod construct was significantly more stable than PS group (P = .032). Stiffness of PS + CS group (445.8 ± 79.3N/mm) was significantly greater (P = .019) than PS (317.8 ± 79.8N/mm). Similarly, failure load of PS + CS group (1824.9 ± 352.2N) was significantly greater (P = .001) than PS (913.4 ± 309.8N). Dual-screw, 4-rod construct may be more stable than traditional rod-to-rod connectors, especially in axial rotation. Axial stiffness and ultimate strength of 4-rod, dual-screw construct were significantly greater than rod-to-rod. In this study, 4-rod construct was found to have potential biomechanical benefits of increased strength, stiffness, stability.

Adding sacral anchors through an S1 alar screw and multirod construct as a strategy for lumbosacral junction augmentation: an in vitro comparison to S1 pedicle screws alone with sacroiliac fixation.

Achieving solid fusion of the lumbosacral junction continues to be a challenge in long-segment instrumentation to the sacrum. The purpose of this study was to test the condition of adding sacral anchors through an S1 alar screw (S1AS) and multirod construct relative to using S1 pedicle screws (S1PSs) alone with sacroiliac fixation in lumbosacral junction augmentation. Seven fresh-frozen human lumbar-pelvic spine cadaveric specimens were tested under nondestructive moments (7.5 Nm). The ranges of motion (ROMs) in extension, flexion, left and right lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) of instrumented segments (L3-S1); the lumbosacral region (L5-S1); and the adjacent segment (L2-3) were measured, and the axial construct stiffness (ACS) was recorded. The testing conditions were 1) intact; 2) bilateral pedicle screw (BPS) fixation at L3-S1 (S1PS alone); 3) BPS and unilateral S2 alar iliac screw (U-S2AIS) fixation; 4) BPS and unilateral S1AS (U-S1AS) fixation; 5) BPS and bilateral S2AIS (B-S2AIS) fixation; and 6) BPS and bilateral S1AS (B-S1AS) fixation. Accessory rods were used in testing conditions 3-6. In all directions, the ROMs of L5-S1 and L3-S1 were significantly reduced in B-S1AS and B-S2AIS conditions, compared with intact and S1PS alone. There was no significant difference in reduction of the ROMs of L5-S1 between B-S1ASs and B-S2AISs. Greater decreased ROMs of L3-S1 in extension and AR were detected with B-S2AISs than with B-S1ASs. Both B-S1ASs and B-S2AISs significantly increased the ACS compared with S1PSs alone. The ACS of B-S2AISs was significantly greater than that of B-S1ASs, but with greater increased ROMs of L2-3 in extension. Adding sacral anchors through S1ASs and a multirod construct was as effective as sacropelvic fixation in lumbosacral junction augmentation. The ACS was less than the sacropelvic fixation but with lower ROMs of the adjacent segment. The biomechanical effects of using S1ASs in the control of long-instrumented segments were moderate (better than S1PSs alone but worse than sacropelvic fixation). This strategy is appropriate for patients requiring advanced lumbosacral fixation, and the risk of sacroiliac joint violation can be avoided.

Does number of rods matter? 4-, 5-, and 6-rods across a lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a finite element analysis

PurposeTo assess biomechanics of a lumbar PSO stabilized with different multi-rod constructs (4-, 5-, 6-rods) using satellite and accessory rods.MethodsA validated spinopelvic finite element model with a L3 PSO was used to evaluate the following constructs: 2 primary rods T10-pelvis (“Control”), two satellite rods (4-rod), two satellite rods + one accessory rod (5-rod), or two satellite rods + two accessory rods (6-rod). Data recorded included: ROM T10-S1 and L2-L4, von Mises stresses on primary, satellite, and accessory rods, factor of safety yield stress, and force across the PSO surfaces. Percent differences relative to Control were calculated.ResultsCompared to Control, 4-rods increased PSO flexion and extension. Lower PSO ROMs were observed for 5- and 6-rods compared to 4-rods. However, 4-rod (348.6 N) and 5-rod (343.2 N) showed higher PSO forces than 2-rods (336 N) and 6-rods had lower PSO forces (324.2 N). 5- and 6-rods led to the lowest rod von Mises stresses across the PSO. 6-rod had the maximum factor of safety on the primary rods.ConclusionsIn this finite element analysis, 4-rods reduced stresses on primary rods across a lumbar PSO. Although increased rigidity afforded by 5- and 6-rods decreased rod stresses, it resulted in less load transfer to the anterior vertebral column (particularly for 6-rod), which may not be favorable for the healing of the anterior column. A balance between the construct’s rigidity and anterior load sharing is essential.

Two- versus multi-rod constructs for adult spinal deformity: A systematic review and Random-effects and Bayesian meta-analysis

BackgroundSurgical approaches in adult spinal deformity are associated with high rates of adverse events including hardware failure and rod fracture. Recently, some reports have emerged comparing multiple-rod constructs with 2-rod constructs suggesting potential benefits with the former. However, these have been limited by variability in observed outcomes, which have limited the change of paradigm in adult spinal deformity surgery. ObjectiveTo compare the rate of rod fracture, pseudoarthrosis, proximal junctional kyphosis and re-operation between 2-RC and M-RC. MethodsMEDLINE/Pubmed, Web of Science and Embase were searched without language restrictions for relevant articles from inception until October 2021. All observational cohort studies assessing patients with ADS undergoing 3-column osteotomy and comparing 2-RC with M-RC procedures on pseudarthrosis, rod fracture, kyphosis or reoperation were included. Data were independently extracted by 2 authors. Random-effects and Bayesian meta-analysis were used. ResultsSix primary studies met inclusion criteria, yielding a total of 448 participants, with 223 receiving 2-RC and 225 M-RC. The random-effects meta-analysis pointed to a significantly lower risk of rod fracture associated with M-RC (RR = 0.43, 95 %CI = 0.28–0.66), with moderate heterogeneity being observed (I2 = 20 %, p = 0.28). The random-effects meta-analysis pointed to a lower risk of pseudoarthrosis with M-RC than with 2-RC (RR = 0.49, CI = 0.28–0.84, to a lower rate of re-operation with M-RC than with 2-RC (RR = 0.52, CI = 0.28–0.97) and to a similar rate of proximal junctional kyphosis between 2-RC and M-RC patients (RR = 0.91, CI = 0.60–1.39). Low heterogeneity was observed for studies comparing pseudoarthrosis (I2 = 9 %, p = 0.35), re-operation (I2 = 0 %, p = 0.41) and proximal junctional kyphosis (I2 = 0 %, p = 0.85). DiscussionThese findings suggest that multiple rod-fracture constructs are associated with lower rates of rod fracture, re-operation rates, pseudoarthrosis but not proximal junctional kyphosis. Future studies should address the impact of other modulators of heterogeneity such as body mass index, metal alloys and length of the constructs.

High-Demand Spinal Deformity With Multi-Rod Constructs and Porous Fusion/Fixation Implants: A Finite Element Study.

Basic science (finite element analysis). Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) at L5 is an effective treatment for sagittal imbalance, especially in select cases of patients showing kyphosis with the apex at L4-L5 but has been scarcely investigated. The aim of this study was to simulate various "high-demand" instrumentation approaches, including varying numbers of rods and sacropelvic implants, for the stabilization of a PSO at L5. A finite element model of T10-pelvis was modified to simulate posterior fixation with pedicle screws and rods from T10 to S1, alone or in combination with an L5 PSO. Five additional configurations were then created by employing rods and novel porous fusion/fixation implants across the sacroiliac joints, in varying numbers. All models were loaded using pure moments of 7.5Nm in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The osteotomy resulted in a general increase in motion and stresses in posterior rods and S1 pedicle screws. When the number of rods was varied, three- and four-rod configurations were effective in limiting the maximal rod stresses; values approached those of posterior fixation with no osteotomy. Maximum stresses in the accessory rods were similar to or less than those observed in the primary rods. Multiple sacropelvic implants were effective in reducing range of motion, particularly of the SIJ. Multi-rod constructs and sacropelvic fixation generally reduced maximal implant stresses and motion in comparison with standard posterior fixation, suggesting a reduced risk of rod breakage and increased joint stability, respectively, when a high-demand construct is utilized for the correction of sagittal imbalance.

Rod fractures after multi-rod constructs in adult spinal deformity patients fused to the sacrum/pelvis: where do they occur and why?

(1) To describe the use of multi-rod constructs (MRCs) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, (2) to report rod fractures occurring at MRC sites, and (3) to evaluate risk factors for rod fractures. A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients undergoing ASD surgery with these inclusion criteria: minimum 2-year follow-up, MRCs used, ≥ 10-level fusion, and fused to sacrum/pelvis. The primary outcome was rod fracture. Univariate/multivariate logistic regression was performed controlling for age, kickstand rod usage, number of rods across the lumbosacral junction (LSJ), and the amount of coronal/sagittal Cobb correction. Among 57 patients undergoing ASD surgery with MRCs, mean age was 60 ± 11years. With respect to MRCs, 32 (56%) patients had 3 rods, 18 (32%) had 4, and 7 (12%) had 5. Rods crossing the LSJ were most often three (63%), followed by four (25%) and five (5%) rods. Nine (16%) patients experienced rod fractures with eight (89%) patients having no more than three rods crossing the LSJ. A coronal correction > 30mm was more often seen in patients with rod fracture (p = 0.030), while an SVA correction > 50mm was not significantly different (p = 0.608). Multivariate logistic regression revealed that the amount of coronal correction was significantly associated with rod fracture (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, p = 0.044), as was achieving a coronal correction > 30mm (OR 7.72, 95% CI 1.17-51.10, p = 0.034), with no association between the amount of sagittal correction obtained and rod fracture. This study found that greater coronal correction was associated with an increasedodds of rod fracture. We suggest adding at least four rods across the LSJ cephalad to the interbody fusions to avoid rod fractures in these high demand areas. III.

183. The ideal satellite rod configuration spanning a lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a finite element analysis

183. The ideal satellite rod configuration spanning a lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a finite element analysis

P24. Is there a benefit to increasing number of rods (4-, 5-, and 6-) across a lumbar PSO? A finite element analysis

P24. Is there a benefit to increasing number of rods (4-, 5-, and 6-) across a lumbar PSO? A finite element analysis

Biomechanical comparison of multi-rod constructs by satellite rod configurations (in-line vs. lateral) and screw types (monoaxial vs. polyaxial) spanning a lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO): is there an optimal configuration?

PurposeMulti-rod constructs are used commonly to stabilize pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO). This study aimed to evaluate biomechanical properties of different satellite rod configurations and effects of screw-type spanning a PSO.MethodsA validated 3D spinopelvic finite element model with a L3 PSO (30°) was used to evaluate 5 models: (1) Control (T10–pelvis + 2 rods); (2) lateral satellite rods connected via offsets to monoaxial screws (LatSat-Mono) or (3) polyaxial screws (LatSat-Poly); (4) in-line satellite rods connected to monoaxial screws (InSat-Mono) or (4) polyaxial screws (InSat-Poly). Global and PSO range of motions (ROM) were recorded. Rods’ von Mises stresses and PSO forces were recorded and the percent differences from Control were calculated.ResultsAll satellite rods (save InSat-Mono) increased PSO ROM and decreased primary rods’ von Mises stresses at the PSO. Lateral rods increased PSO forces (LatSat-Mono:347.1 N; LatSat-Poly:348.6 N; Control:336 N) and had relatively lower stresses, while in-line rods decreased PSO forces (InSat-Mono:280.1 N; InSat-Poly:330.7 N) and had relatively higher stresses. Relative to polyaxial screws, monoaxial screws further decreased PSO ROM, increased satellite rods’ stresses, and decreased PSO forces for in-line rods, but did not change PSO forces for lateral rods.ConclusionMulti-rod constructs using in-line and lateral satellite rods across a PSO reduced primary rods' stresses. Subtle differences in biomechanics suggest lateral satellite rods, irrespective of screw type, increase PSO forces and lower rod stresses compared to in-line satellite rods, which had a high degree of posterior instrumentation stress shielding and lower PSO forces. Clinical studies are warranted to determine if these findings influence clinical outcomes.

The lexicon of multirod constructs in adult spinal deformity: a concise description of when, why, and how.

The use of multirod constructs in the setting of adult spinal deformity (ASD) began to prevent rod fracture and pseudarthrosis near the site of pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSOs) and 3-column osteotomies (3COs). However, there has been unclear and inconsistent nomenclature, both clinically and in the literature, for the various techniques of supplemental rod implantation. In this review the authors aim to provide the first succinct lexicon of multirod constructs available for the treatment of ASD, providing a universal nomenclature and definition for each type of supplementary rod. The primary rod of ASD constructs is the longest rod that typically spans from the bottom of the construct to the upper instrumented vertebrae. The secondary rod is shorter than the primary rod, but is connected directly to pedicle screws, albeit fewer of them, and connects to the primary rod via lateral connectors or cross-linkers. Satellite rods are a 4-rod technique in which 2 rods span only the site of a 3CO via pedicle screws at the levels above and below, and are not connected to the primary rod (hence the term "satellite"). Accessory rods are connected to the primary rods via side connectors and buttress the primary rod in areas of high rod strain, such as at a 3CO or the lumbosacral junction. Delta rods span the site of a 3CO, typically a PSO, and are not contoured to the newly restored lordosis of the spine, thus buttressing the primary rod above and below a 3CO. The kickstand rod itself functions as an additional means of restoring coronal balance and is secured to a newly placed iliac screw on the side of truncal shift and connected to the primary rod; distracting against the kickstand then helps to correct the concavity of a coronal curve. The use of multirod constructs has dramatically increased over the last several years in parallel with the increasing prevalence of ASD correction surgery. However, ambiguity persists both clinically and in the literature regarding the nomenclature of each supplemental rod. This nomenclature of supplemental rods should help unify the lexicon of multirod constructs and generalize their usage in a variety of scientific and clinical scenarios.

RCC (reinforced criss-cross construct): an easy and effective multi-rod thoraco-lumbar posterior reconstruction technique.

Surgical technical note and literature review. To describe a technique that uses 4 rod constructs in cases of complex thoracolumbar spinal deformity correction or revision surgeries based on the hybrid use of two different types of purchase points by a staggered pedicle screw fixation. It utilizes two rods on either side of the spine using a lateral and medial entry point of pedicle screws in the vertebral body. Pedicle screws using extra-pedicular technique are more converging screws and are inserted alternately in the vertebral body and connected by rods. The left-out alternate vertebral bodies are fixed by a relatively straighter pedicle entry screw and connected to each other by a separate rod. So, two trajectories are independently used for a four-rod construct. This reconstruction has been named RCC (reinforced criss-cross construct). The screws in the index case were placed by free hand method, but we have increasingly utilized navigation guidance for placement of screws in recent times. We present a surgical technical note in a patient with human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV-AIDS). He was diagnosed to have multi-drug-resistant (MDR) tuberculous spondylodiscitis, complicated with Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) and implant failure resulting in kyphosis and thoracic myelopathy. RCC with pharmacological management achieved healing and union, which was maintained at 4years follow-up. Our method of four-rod construct provides a strong and lasting construct in the management of spinal deformities and three-column osteotomies. It provides good structural support to the spine till bony union is achieved. Hybrid multi-rod construct like RCC provides a rigid mechanical support to the instrumentation and reduces the chances of rod failure especially in complex thoraco-lumbar spinal deformity correction surgeries.

Revision Surgery for a Rod Fracture with Multirod Constructs Using a Posterior-Only Approach Following Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity.

Single-center retrospective case series. We aimed to evaluate the clinical results of revision surgery for a rod fracture using a posterior-only approach and determine the best procedure to prevent refracture in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). ASD affects the thoracolumbar spine and often requires surgical correction. However, surgery for extensive spinal fusion causes rod fracture, a major mechanical complication. Few studies have described the treatment methods for rod fractures. Furthermore, the clinical outcomes of revision surgery for rod fractures in patients with ASD are currently unclear. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 404 patients who underwent corrective fusion surgery for ASD with a minimum 2-year follow-up. We studied cases of reoperation for postoperative rod fractures and investigated surgical procedure, intraoperative findings, clinical course, and rod refracture following revision surgery. Rod fracture was observed in 88 patients (21.8%). Fifty-three patients (average age, 68.3 years; average blood loss, 502.2 mL [% estimated blood volume=16.4%]; and operation time, 203.3 minutes) who suffered from a rod fracture at an average of 28.3 months after the primary operation underwent reoperation. Surgical invasiveness had no significant differences in total or partial rod replacement; however, the procedures with and without an anterior bone graft significantly differed. The replaced rod refractured at an average of 35.3 months after the revision surgery of five patients. The rod also refractured at a level outside multiple rods in two patients and with traumatic episodes in three patients. Three patients had bone grafts in the anterior column. Revision surgery involving a multirod with a posterior-only approach for a rod fracture that occurred after ASD was performed successfully. Bone grafting in the anterior column is unnecessary for patients without massive bone defects.

How do additional rods reduce loads on the primary rods in adult spinal instrumentation with pedicle subtraction osteotomy?

BackgroundAdditional auxiliary rods have been used in spinal instrumentation across pedicle subtraction osteotomy to reduce stresses in the primary rods. The auxiliary rods can be connected through dual-rod-screws, fixed-angle multi-rod connectors or variable-angle multi-rod connectors. The objective was to assess rod bending in conventional bilateral-rod construct vs. constructs with auxiliary rods. MethodsComputer models of two adult patients were developed to evaluate bending loads across a pedicle subtraction site in a control construct with bilateral rods vs. constructs with auxiliary rods bilaterally or unilaterally connected to the primary rods through either dual-rod-screws, fixed-angle multi-rod connectors, or variable-angle multi-rod connectors. Postoperative rod bending loads were computed and compared. FindingsNormalizing loads on the primary rods in the multi-rod constructs to the control construct, primary rod loads in multi-rod constructs were 17% to 48% lower than the control construct. Constructs with bilateral auxiliary rods through dual-rod-screws, fixed-angle multi-rod connectors, or variable-angle multi-rod connectors could result in similar primary rod bending loads. Bending loads on the auxiliary rods were higher or lower than those on the primary rods depending on how their curvatures matched the primary rods, and how they were locked onto the primary rods. InterpretationAuxiliary rods noticeably reduced the bending loads on the primary rods compared with a standard bilateral-rod construct. Loads in the auxiliary rods were higher or lower than those in the primary rods depending on how their curvatures matched the primary rods, and how they were locked onto the primary rods.