Multidisciplinary Oncology Research Articles

A Comparison of Palliative Care Perceptions Across Metastatic Spine Patients and the General Population.

Background: Palliative care (PC) has been shown to benefit patients with metastatic cancer by managing symptoms, improving quality of life, and facilitating advance care planning. Despite this, PC is often misunderstood and underutilized. Objective: To deepen our understanding of PC barriers seen among the spine metastasis population. Design/Setting: Between March 2021 and August 2022, people with metastatic spine tumors (MSTs) at a multidisciplinary oncology clinic were administered a survey on PC prior to their scheduled appointment. These responses were compared with the Health Information National Trends Survey 5 (HINTS 5), which is a validated survey created by the National Cancer Institute between February and June of 2020. Chi-squared statistical analysis was used. Results: Fifty-six people with MST were compared with 3795 patients from the HINTS 5 database. People with MST reported a significantly higher baseline understanding of PC when compared with the general population (GP) (chi-squared = 34.4, p = <0.0001). People with MST had a higher frequency of disagreement with the statement "PC is equivalent with death" when compared with the GP (chi-squared = 12.8, p = 0.0124). Over 25% of the MST group reported no understanding of PC. Conclusion: MST patients are often referred to PC services due to the extreme symptom burden of their disease. Based on this study, in comparison to the GP, people with MST tended to have a more accurate and well-adjusted perception of the goals and functions of PC. Although reassuring, there remains a high proportion of patients who have no knowledge of PC, and groups erroneously associated PC with hospice status.

OA17.03 Missed Opportunities for Early Lung Cancer Detection in a Multi-Disciplinary Thoracic Oncology Clinic Cohort

OA17.03 Missed Opportunities for Early Lung Cancer Detection in a Multi-Disciplinary Thoracic Oncology Clinic Cohort

Assessment of a Medical Student-Run Multidisciplinary Oncology Shadowing Program.

Clinical exposures during the first two years of medical school (MS1-2) provide students an opportunity for early networking, mentorship and career exploration. The feasibility and perceived value of an extracurricular, student-run multidisciplinary oncology shadowing program was evaluated in this study. At a single institution, an oncology interest group collaborated with oncologists to create a shadowing program for MS1-2 students. Three radiation oncology (RO), two medical oncology (MO), and four surgical oncology (SO) faculty participated. A quarterly sign-up form was emailed to all MS1-2 students with available shadowing sessions. Electronic surveys were sent to students (after shadowing) and faculty (after 18months of program operation) with multiple choice and 5-point Likert-type (1 = low, 5 = high) questions about their experiences. A total of 57 of the 97 participating students, and all 9 of the 9 participating faculty, responded to surveys (response rates 59% and 100%, respectively). Thirty students (53%) shadowed in RO, 23 (40%) in SO, and 4 (7%) in MO. Most students were very satisfied with their interactions with faculty (mean Likert-type rating of 4.14 ± standard deviation 0.85) and their overall experience compared to prior shadowing experiences (3.84 ± 0.85). Fifty-four students (96%) would recommend the experience to a classmate. Four faculty (44%) reported much more shadowing than before. Seven faculty (78%) felt the experience was best when residents or fellows were also present. All physicians planned to continue participating. This study demonstrated that a student-run, oncology shadowing program was feasible to implement, and viewed favorably by faculty and student participants.

Outcomes of multidisciplinary management of pulmonary nodules in a tertiary center

Objective: A multidisciplinary approach is recommended for managing pulmonary nodules. This study aimed to examine the malignancy rates, malignancy determinants, and follow-up results of patients with pulmonary nodules whom the multidisciplinary team evaluates. Methods: Clinical characteristics of the patients, radiological and histological characteristics of the nodules, and the follow-up outcomes were documented retrospectively. A total of 94 patients with solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) (n=58) and multiple pulmonary nodules (MPNs) (n=36) were included in the study. Results: Our study showed that malignancy risk increased with irregular nodule margins (p &lt; 0.008). Patients who had tissue sampling from suspected nodules exhibited markedly higher rates of previous malignancy than those who did not (58.5% vs. 19.5% p&lt;0.001). For the patients with solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN), the group for whom biopsy was planned had more underlying malignancy (p=0.011) and had a bigger nodule size of 10 mm (range, 8.0-13.25 mm) vs 15.00 mm (range, 10.0-19.75 mm) (p=0.003). Among the patients who have multiple pulmonary nodules (MPN), eighty-four percent of patients in the biopsy group had underlying malignancy diagnoses, whereas this rate was 26% in the CT follow-up group (p=0.002). Adenocarcinoma was the most common SPN histology and squamous cell carcinoma for MPNs. The Multidisciplinary Thoracic Oncology Board identified malignancy in 60% of patients with SPNs and 92.3% of those with MPNs/ Conclusions: Patients evaluated in the multidisciplinary tumor board consist of a very diverse patient group. Discerning between malignant and benign conditions relies heavily on examining nodule features and assessing malignancy history.

Toward standardized brain tumor tissue processing protocols in neuro-oncology: a perspective for gliomas and beyond.

Implementation of standardized protocols in neurooncology during the surgical resection of brain tumors is needed to advance the clinical treatment paradigms that use tissue for diagnosis, prognosis, bio-banking, and treatment. Currently recommendations on intraoperative tissue procurement only exist for diffuse gliomas but management of other brain tumor subtypes can also benefit from these protocols. Fresh tissue from surgical resection can now be used for intraoperative diagnostics and functional precision medicine assays. A multidisciplinary neuro-oncology perspective is critical to develop the best avenues for practical standardization. This perspective from the multidisciplinary Oncology Tissue Advisory Board (OTAB) discusses current advances, future directions, and the imperative of adopting standardized protocols for diverse brain tumor entities. There is a growing need for consistent operating room practices to enhance patient care, streamline research efforts, and optimize outcomes.

Abstract B104: Identifying gaps in equitable cancer care: insights from US-based oncology professionals engaged in continuing medical education

Abstract Introduction: A previous evaluation of a five-part accredited continuing medical education (CME) designed to inspire action for equitable cancer care amongst US-based multidisciplinary oncology care team members, showed significant improvements in relevant knowledge and confidence (pre to post activity). This study aimed to revisit the data collected in the scope of this project to identify remaining challenges in ensuring equitable cancer care is delivered to all patients, with underlying gaps in knowledge, confidence and attitude that may be addressed through future CME. Methods: A secondary analysis of data was performed on quantitative (case-based multiple-choice) responses collected from US-based HCPs who completed at least one of the five accredited CME activities that were part of the program titled “Addressing Racial Disparities in Cancer Care”. Questions assessed learners’ knowledge, confidence, and attitudes after exposure to the CME. Crosstabulations with chi-square statistical tests compared quantitative responses by sub-group. The analysis focused on post-CME data to identify remaining educational gaps, with the aim of informing the development of future CME programs. Results: The five-part CME education reached 1151 unique HCPs involved in cancer care, with activity participation varying between n=103 to n=433. The profession/specialty sub-group most represented in aggregated responses across the five-part CME were registered nurses specialized in hematology/oncology (n=575/1145, 50%). Across US regions, respondents were mostly located in South US (n=446/1150, 39%). A challenge in helping patients navigate socio- economic barriers to oncology care was found, with the following four related gaps affecting a portion of respondents post-CME exposure: 1) misconception that the most important determinant of treatment adherence is a patient’s perceived treatment efficacy rather than optimal patient-provider communication (n=57/400, 14%), 2) sub-optimal knowledge of the impact of a patient’s community and/or partner on influencing their treatment-seeking behavior (n=31/97, 32%), 3) sub-optimal knowledge of necessary steps to address the root cause of a patients’ missed appointments (n=36/227, 16%), 4) sub-optimal confidence in addressing a patients’ personal circumstances limiting their access to cancer-care (n=424/1151, 37%). Conclusions: This study identified remaining gaps in knowledge, confidence and attitude among US-based HCPs post-exposure to a CME activity aimed at promoting equitable cancer care. Considering these gaps were observed post-education, the actual proportion of US-based HCPs affected is likely underestimated. Future continuing learning initiatives aimed at addressing cancer care disparities in the US should consider targeting gaps identified in this study by challenging learners to re-consider their knowledge, beliefs and confidence in best approaches to navigating the socio-economic barriers hindering patients from seeking cancer care (e.g., via adaptive learning, peer-to-peer learning). Citation Format: Monica Augustyniak, Karen Eldridge, Jayne Gurtler, Benyam Muluneh, Amy DePue, Julia Rodriguez-O'Donnell, Stacy Atkinson, Sophie Péloquin, Ann Murphy, Patrice Lazure. Identifying gaps in equitable cancer care: insights from US-based oncology professionals engaged in continuing medical education [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B104.

A Qualitative Study on the Impact and Feasibility of a Simulation-Based Program for Shared Decision-Making in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Care.

In the pursuit of improved clinical outcomes and patient experience in health care, shared decision-making (SDM) stands as a pivotal concept garnering increasing attention, but SDM utilization varies widely, often leading to confusion regarding team members' roles. This study explores knowledge, skills, and attitudes of oncology clinicians engaged in a pioneering educational initiative at a comprehensive cancer care center, aimed at enhancing frontline SDM capabilities. Utilizing a prospective cohort qualitative approach, the team conducted interviews with 6 clinicians in a multidisciplinary oncology program who were engaged in an SDM continuing education program. In the program, participants were immersed in experiential learning activities including standardized didactic sessions and simulation-based SDM case role-play activities. Thematic analysis of interview data revealed 5 major categories: 1) perceptions of SDM; 2) training; 3) patient-centered care; 4) challenges and constraints; and 5) leadership buy-in. Participants perceived benefits, including adopting a better approach to integrate SDM into their practice, heightened engagement, emphasizing team collaboration, and embracing a patient-centric care model. This study underscores the transformative impact of education and training on enhancing SDM capabilities among oncology clinicians and is not intended for generalizability. By promoting a basic understanding and application of SDM principles, practicing clinicians can be better empowered to improve health care outcomes and experience. Our findings contribute to the broader endeavor of embedding practical SDM principles within clinical practice, thereby fostering a more patient-centered and effective health care environment.

Evaluation of ChatGPT-4's Performance in Therapeutic Decision-Making During Multidisciplinary Oncology Meetings for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Objectives First reports suggest that artificial intelligence (AI) such as ChatGPT-4 (Open AI, ChatGPT-4, San Francisco, USA) might represent reliable tools for therapeutic decisions in some medical conditions. This study aims to assess the decisional capacity of ChatGPT-4 in patients with head and neck carcinomas, using the multidisciplinary oncology meeting (MOM) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) decision as references. Methods This retrospective study included 263 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx who were followed at our institution between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021. The recommendation of GPT4 for the first- and second-line treatments was compared to the MOM decision and NCCN guidelines. The degrees of agreement were calculated using the Kappa method, which measures the degree of agreement between two evaluators. Results ChatGPT-4 demonstrated a moderate agreement in first-line treatment recommendations (Kappa = 0.48) and a substantial agreement (Kappa = 0.78) in second-line treatment recommendations compared to the decisions from MOM. A substantial agreement with the NCCN guidelines for both first- and second-line treatments was observed (Kappa = 0.72 and 0.66, respectively). The degree of agreement decreased when the decision included gastrostomy, patients over 70, and those with comorbidities. Conclusions The study illustrates that while ChatGPT-4 can significantly support clinical decision-making in oncology by aligning closely with expert recommendations and established guidelines, ongoing enhancements and training are crucial. The findings advocate for the continued evolution of AI tools to better handle the nuanced aspects of patient health profiles, thus broadening their applicability and reliability in clinical practice.

Multidisciplinary oncology clinicians' experiences delivering spiritual care to patients with cancer and their care partners.

To understand multidisciplinary healthcare clinicians' meaningful and challenging experiences providing spiritual care to patients with cancer and their care partners. Multidisciplinary clinicians who participated in a communication training program supported by the National Cancer Institute or a palliative care training for nurses (N = 257) responded to two, open-ended questions about meaningful and challenging experiences of providing spiritual care. A thematic analysis of responses using an iterative, inductive approach was conducted until saturation was reached. Participants from nursing (68%), social work (22%), and chaplaincy (10%) responded to open-ended survey questions. Three themes related to meaningful experiences of providing spiritual care emerged: building authentic interpersonal connection with patients and care partners; creating intentional space for patients and care partners to inform spiritual care; and actively supporting patients and care partners in their processes with spirituality. Three themes related to challenging experiences of providing spiritual care emerged: contextual factors and clinical circumstances complicate provision of spiritual care; facing barriers to providing high-quality, patient-centered care; and navigating ethical and logistical issues that affect spiritual and other care. Clinicians derive meaning from a range of experiences throughout their provision of spiritual care to patients with cancer. However, they also face many challenges in delivering person-centered spiritual care in cancer settings, with some challenges reflecting significant gaps in spiritual care knowledge and training. Findings can guide future training and educational endeavors for multidisciplinary clinicians in the domain of spiritual care.

Alliance A022104/NRG-GI010: The Janus Rectal Cancer Trial: a randomized phase II/III trial testing the efficacy of triplet versus doublet chemotherapy regarding clinical complete response and disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

BackgroundRecent data have demonstrated that in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), a total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) approach improves compliance with chemotherapy and increases rates of tumor response compared to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) alone. They further indicate that the optimal sequencing of TNT involves consolidation (rather than induction) chemotherapy to optimize complete response rates. Data, largely from retrospective studies, have also shown that patients with clinical complete response (cCR) after TNT may be managed safely with the watch and wait approach (WW) instead of preemptive total mesorectal resection (TME). However, the optimal consolidation chemotherapy regimen to achieve cCR has not been established, and a randomized clinical trial has not robustly evaluated cCR as a primary endpoint. Collaborating with a multidisciplinary oncology team and patient groups, we designed this NCI-sponsored study of chemotherapy intensification to address these issues and to drive up cCR rates, to provide opportunity for organ preservation, improve quality of life for patients and improve survival outcomes.MethodsIn this NCI-sponsored multi-group randomized, seamless phase II/III trial (1:1), up to 760 patients with LARC, T4N0, any T with node positive disease (any T, N +) or T3N0 requiring abdominoperineal resection or coloanal anastomosis and distal margin within 12 cm of anal verge will be enrolled. Stratification factors include tumor stage (T4 vs T1-3), nodal stage (N + vs N0) and distance from anal verge (0–4; 4–8; 8–12 cm). Patients will be randomized to receive neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiation (LCRT) followed by consolidation doublet (mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX) or triplet chemotherapy (mFOLFIRINOX) for 3–4 months. LCRT in both arms involves 4500 cGy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks + 900 cGy boost in 5 fractions with a fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine preferred). Patients will undergo assessment 8–12 (± 4) weeks post-TNT completion. The primary endpoint for the phase II portion will compare cCR between treatment arms. A total number of 312 evaluable patients (156 per arm) will provide statistical power of 90.5% to detect a 17% increase in cCR rate, at a one-sided alpha = 0.048. The primary endpoint for the phase III portion will compare disease-free survival (DFS) between treatment arms. A total of 285 DFS events will provide 85% power to detect an effect size of hazard ratio 0.70 at a one-sided alpha of 0.025, requiring enrollment of 760 patients (380 per arm). Secondary objectives include time-to event outcomes (overall survival, organ preservation time and time to distant metastasis) and adverse event rates. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, plasma and buffy coat, and serial rectal MRIs will be collected for exploratory correlative research. This study, activated in late 2022, is open across the NCTN and had accrued 330 patients as of May 2024. Study support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24 CA196171; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org.DiscussionBuilding on data from modern day rectal cancer trials and patient input from national advocacy groups, we have designed The Janus Rectal Cancer Trial studying chemotherapy intensification via a consolidation chemotherapy approach with the intent to enhance cCR and DFS rates, increase organ preservation rates, and improve quality of life for patients with rectal cancer.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT05610163; Support includes U10CA180868 (NRG) and U10CA180888 (SWOG).

Bioethical and Human Right Considerations during COVID-19 Pandemic Period: Reflections of Integrated Oncology Clinical Services from India

AbstractEver since the outbreak of COVID-19, the global health care systems are overwhelmed to cope up with the rapidly evolving disease paradigm through implementation of action plans at societal and medical domains. As per the directives from the World Health Organization and learned professional organizations, the international governments and states have formulated different protocols to prevent disease spread, for diagnosis and treatment of the disease and associated comorbidities, and to educate citizens during this crisis phase. Health care services across the world followed a “prioritizing strategy” for hospital population wherein the non-COVID cases were given less focus. Many hospitals opted for a conscious staff-sparing strategy to minimize exposure and protection of clinically valuable staff. Oncology services across the world reported a decline in the provision of clinical services to patients. There were medical concerns such as missed diagnosis, delayed diagnosis, delayed treatment, stoppage of screening programs, and differed follow-ups during the last 2 years of pandemic. The multidisciplinary oncology teams aim to ensure that cancer patients in the continuum of integrated cancer care pathway get globally accepted standards of optimum care. However, Beauchamp's ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and distributive justice were arguably compromised during the pandemic period. The articles of UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (UDBHR) declaration were possibly violated in cancer patients as a vulnerable population. This article analyses the bioethical and human right concerns with respect to medical and societal domains in oncology during the COVID-19 pandemic period.

Value of a multidisciplinary geriatric oncology committee on patient care in a community-based, academic cancer center.

e13771 Background: The heterogeneity in health and functional ability among older patients makes the management of cancer a unique challenge. The Geriatric Oncology Program at the University of Maryland Baltimore Washington Medical Center (BWMC) was created to optimize cancer management and recommendations for older patients. This study aimed to assess the benefits of the implementation of such a program at a community- based academic cancer center. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients aged ≥80 years presenting to the Geriatric Oncology Program between January 2017 and July 2022. A multidisciplinary team of specialists collectively reviewed each patient using geriatric-specific domains and stratified each patient into one of three management groups- Group 1: those deemed fit to receive standard oncologic care (SOC); Group 2: those recommended to receive optimization services prior to reassessment for SOC; and Group 3: those deemed to be best suited for supportive care and/ or hospice care. ANOVA, chi-square, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess patient outcomes. Results: Among 233 patients included, 76 (32.6%) received SOC (Group 1), 43 (18.5%) were optimized (Group 2), and 114 (49.0%) received supportive care or hospice referral (Group 3). There was no significant difference in sex, race, or age among all three groups. The Canadian Study of Health and Aging-Clinical Frailty Scale (CSHA-CFS) score was implemented in 2019 (n=90). Patients receiving supportive/ hospice care only had an average score of 5.8, while the averages for those in the optimization and SOC groups were 4.6 and 4.1, respectively (p=&lt; .001). SOC patients had the longest average survival of 2.71 years compared to the optimization (2.30 years) and supportive care groups (0.93 years) (p= &lt;0.001). 69.8% of optimized patients were deemed fit for SOC upon re-evaluation following optimization services. For all patients that underwent surgical interventions, post- operatively, 23 patients (85%) were discharged home and 4 (15%) were discharged to a rehab facility. The average survival after surgery for all patients was 3.16 years, while patients who were optimized prior to surgery had an average survival after surgery of 3.21 years. Conclusions: The present study demonstrates the need for specialized consideration of the heterogeneity that cancer diagnoses present in older individuals. The Geriatric Oncology Program at BWMC is able to maximize treatment outcomes for geriatric patients through the provision of SOC therapies and optimization services, while also minimizing unnecessary interventions on an individual patient-centric level.

Targeted interventions to address local challenges in HR+/HER2- and HER2+ breast cancer treatment in community-based settings.

e23213 Background: Advancements in novel targeted agents and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have dramatically improved patient outcomes and survival for breast cancer patients, yet the successful utilization of these agents remains a key challenge for clinicians, particularly in the community. To improve the care of HR+/HER2- and HER2+ patients, a quality improvement (QI) initiative was conducted across 6 community-based oncology practices. Methods: Between 7/2023 and 10/2023, multidisciplinary oncology team members (N = 98) across 6 US-based community oncology practices were surveyed to identify gaps in the treatment and management of patients with HR+/HER2- and HER2+ breast cancer. Providers then participated in audit/feedback (AF) sessions where they (a) assessed site-specific practice gaps identified via the provider surveys; (b) received targeted education based on their specific gaps; and (c) developed action plans for improvement. Follow-up surveys administered 90 days after AF sessions will evaluate the impact of practice changes driven by the QI initiative. Results: Top challenges reported by providers in caring for patients with HR+/HER2- and HER2+ breast cancer were providing patient-centered supportive care measures (37%), individualizing treatment plans (18%), and managing treatment-related adverse events (14%). Reported challenges in treatment sequencing included rapidly evolving guideline recommendations (44%) and knowing which treatment to select when patients are eligible for multiple lines of therapy (34%). Additionally, oncology team members reported having the most difficulty managing treatment-related neurological effects (32%), neutropenia (16%), and GI toxicities (14%). Providers believed improved collaboration across interprofessional teams (28%) and increased patient education/referrals for supportive care (26%) would most improve care for breast cancer patients. To address the identified gaps at each location, teams participated in targeted AF sessions focused on addressing their specific gaps and developed action plans, such as developing new workflows for improving care coordination, implementing institutional protocols for identifying and managing adverse events, and improving patient supportive care, quality-of-life assessments, and distress screenings. Full findings from baseline surveys will be presented, along with follow-up surveys measuring real-world impact of the system-level practice changes. Conclusions: Through this QI initiative, teams identified gaps/barriers in their own practices, and developed and implemented action plans for improvement. These data and actionable insights support safe, effective, and evidence-based integration of novel therapies into HR+/HER2- and HER2+ breast cancer care to optimize patient outcomes.

Study protocol OKRA: orientation compass for the preparing, delivering and following up on breaking bad news conversations in paediatric oncology

IntroductionIn paediatric oncology, ‘breaking bad news’—BBN—like cancer diagnosis is perceived as particularly challenging. Enabling a trialogue between children with their relatives and health professionals requires profound communication skills. Lacking the...

HUNCHEST projects-advancing low-dose CT lung cancer screening in Hungary.

Lung cancer, the leading cause of malignancy-related deaths worldwide, demands proactive measures to mitigate its impact. Low-dose computer tomography (LDCT) has emerged as a promising tool for secondary prevention through lung cancer screening (LCS). The HUNCHEST study, inspired by the success of international trials, including the National Lung Cancer Screening Trial and the Dutch NELSON study, embarked on the first LDCT-based LCS program in Hungary. The initiative assessed the screening efficiency, incorporating lung function tests and exploring the interplay between lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Building upon this foundation, an implementation trial involving 18 Hungarian centers supported by the Ministry of Human Capacities demonstrated the feasibility of LCS within a multicentric framework. These centers, equipped with radiology capabilities, collaborated with multidisciplinary oncology teams, ensuring optimal patient pathways. However, a critical challenge remained the patient recruitment. To address this, the HUNCHEST 3 project, initiated in 2023, seeks to engage general practitioners (GPs) to reach out to eligible patients within a municipality collective of 60 thousand inhabitants. The project's ultimate success is contingent upon the willingness of eligible individuals to undergo LDCT scans. In conclusion, the HUNCHEST program represents a crucial step in advancing lung cancer screening in Hungary. With a focus on efficiency, multidisciplinary collaboration, and innovative patient recruitment strategies, it endeavors to contribute to the reduction of lung cancer mortality and serve as a blueprint for potential nationwide LCS programs.

Improving the efficiency of the Multidisciplinary Oncology Consultation in Moscow Outpatient Oncology Care Centers

Improving the efficiency of the Multidisciplinary Oncology Consultation in Moscow Outpatient Oncology Care Centers

Palliative care tumor board: a narrative review and presentation of a novel conference to enhance collaboration and coordination of pain and symptom management for patients with advanced cancer.

The World Health Organization endorses that palliative care has a significant impact on the outcomes of patients with cancer. Integration of palliative care into standard oncology practice has been shown to improve a variety of patient outcomes. In this article, we present our experience with the development of a palliative care tumor board. Starting in June 2021, we implemented a multidisciplinary palliative care and oncology tumor board focused on pain and symptom management. Complex cases were presented bimonthly. We retrospectively reviewed our experience. Data were collected on the attendees, the case presented, and the resultant therapeutic decisions made. Between June 2021 and September 2022, tumor board meetings were conducted in person and virtually. An average of twelve people attended, including physicians and nurse practitioners from the palliative care, oncology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, psychiatry, pediatric palliative care, and physical medicine and rehab disciplines. There were 68 patients presented with the most frequently discussed cancer being breast cancer, followed by lung cancer. A total of 18 patients (26%) were referred for procedure, including 7 patients (10%) for radiation and 11 patients (16%) for interventional procedures, and 34 patients (50%) had medication changes as outcomes of the meeting. The development of a biweekly palliative care conference modeled after traditional oncologic tumor board meetings allows patients to be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting and commonly results in changes in the management for pain and other cancer-related symptoms.

Value of a multidisciplinary geriatric oncology committee on patient care in a community-based, academic cancer center

IntroductionThe heterogeneity in health and functional ability among older patients makes the management of cancer a unique challenge. The Geriatric Oncology Program at the University of Maryland Baltimore Washington Medical Center (BWMC) was created to optimize cancer management for older patients. This study aimed to assess the benefits of the implementation of such a program at a community-based academic cancer center. Materials and MethodsWe analyzed patients aged ≥80 years presenting to the Geriatric Oncology Program between 2017 and 2022. A multidisciplinary team of specialists collectively reviewed each patient using geriatric-specific domains and stratified each patient into one of three management groups- Group 1: those deemed fit to receive standard oncologic care (SOC); Group 2: those recommended to receive optimization services prior to reassessment for SOC; and Group 3: those deemed to be best suited for supportive care and/or hospice care. ResultsThe study cohort consisted of 233 patients, of which 76 (32.6%) received SOC, 43 (18.5%) were optimized, and 114 (49.0%) received supportive care or hospice referral. Among the optimized patients, 69.8% were deemed fit for SOC upon re-evaluation following their respective optimization services. The Canadian Study of Health and Aging-Clinical Frailty Scale (CSHA-CFS) score was implemented in 2019 (n = 90). Patients receiving supportive/hospice care only had an average score of 5.8, while the averages for those in the optimization and SOC groups were 4.6 and 4.1, respectively (p ≤0.001). Patients receiving SOC had the longest average survival of 2.71 years compared to the optimization (2.30 years) and supportive care groups (0.93 years) (p ≤0.001). For all patients that underwent surgical interventions post-operatively, 23 patients (85%) were discharged home and four (15%) were discharged to a rehabilitation facility. DiscussionThe present study demonstrates the profound impact that the complexities in health status and frailty among older individuals can have during cancer management. The Geriatric Oncology Program at BWMC maximized treatment outcomes for older adults through the provision of SOC therapies and optimization services, while also minimizing unnecessary interventions on an individual patient-centric level.

Participant Evaluation of a Multi-disciplinary Oncology Preceptorship Training Program for Oncology Health Professionals from Kumasi, Ghana

A critical shortage of skilled healthcare workers is a primary cause of disparate global cancer outcomes. We report participant evaluation of a multidisciplinary preceptorship program. In collaboration with the city of Kumasi, Ghana, Mayo Clinic and the City Cancer Challenge hosted a preceptorship program for comprehensive multidisciplinary breast and cervix cancer training. A total of 14 healthcare workers from Kumasi received two weeks of training at Mayo Clinic in November and December 2021. Each participant and preceptor were requested to complete an anonymous post-participation survey. Of the 14 trainee participants, 10 (71%) completed the survey. All respondents found the program “valuable and applicable to their clinical practice.” Ninety percent reported they were able to “review effective and critical elements in the development and expansion of the multidisciplinary team” and able to “solve practical clinical cases as a team”. General themes of satisfaction included: (1) organization and administration, (2) clinical observations and demonstrations, (3) guidelines development, and (4) recognizing the central importance of cultivating a team-based approach. Of the 40 preceptors, 16 (40%) completed the survey. All respondents reported they felt the training would meaningfully “influence patient care in Ghana”, that participation “added value or joy to their clinical practice,” and all wished to “participate in future preceptorship programs”. After a focused two-week program, trainees reported high satisfaction, usefulness from observing specialized cancer care, and value in closely observing a multidisciplinary oncology team. Preceptors reported the experience added joy and perspective to their clinical practice and wished to participate in future programs.

In-hospital psychoeducation for family caregivers of Nigerian children with cancer (The RESCUE Study).

High levels of caregiver burden (CB) are experienced by informal caregivers of pediatric patients with cancer. There is increasing evidence highlighting the extent of CB across sub-Saharan African countries, although there remains lack of interventions that target improvements in their experience. This study aimed to determine the impact of a structured psychoeducation program on caregivers' outcomes relating to preparedness to provide care, burden of caregiving, and quality of life (QoL). This quasi-experimental (pre-and-posttest) design, involved family caregivers of children on admission for cancer treatment in 4 Nigerian tertiary hospitals. Eligible participants received 2 structured, psychoeducational training sessions delivered by a multidisciplinary oncology team, focusing on the management of patients' condition, spiritual care, self-care, and support. Subjects were mainly female (79.5%) and mostly mothers to children undergoing cancer treatment (74.7%). Commonest cancer type was acute lymphoblastic leukemia (23.9%) with evidence of metastatic disease found in 9.6% of children. Significant improvements were observed between pre- and posttest for unmet needs (z = -9.3; p < 0.001), preparedness for caregiving in palliative care (PCPC) (z = -7.0; p < 0.001), and overall QoL (z = -7.3; p < 0.001). A significant reduction in CB was also reported (z = -8.7; p < 0.001). This psychoeducational intervention (PEI) resulted in significant improvements in unmet needs, CB and significant improvements in PCPC. However, a reduction in QoL of the family caregivers was also observed. Findings from this study should encourage the use of well-crafted PEIs, delivered within hospital settings to promote improvements in outcomes for informal caregivers of hospitalized children suffering from cancer, in an African context. Further intervention development is required to better understand intervention components influencing changes in outcomes, while exploring feasibility testing and adaptation to similar settings in Nigeria and within Africa.