Motor Learning In Healthy Individuals Research Articles

Differences in the early stages of motor learning between visual-motor illusion and action observation

The visual-motor illusion (VMI) induces a kinesthetic illusion by watching one’s physically-moving video while the body is at rest. It remains unclear whether the early stages (immediately to one hour later) of motor learning are promoted by VMI. This study investigated whether VMI changes the early stages of motor learning in healthy individuals. Thirty-six participants were randomly assigned to two groups: the VMI or action observation condition. Each condition was performed with the left hand for 20 min. The VMI condition induced a kinesthetic illusion by watching one’s ball-rotation task video. The action observation condition involved watching the same video as the VMI condition but did not induce a kinesthetic illusion. The ball-rotation task and brain activity during the task were measured pre, post1 (immediately), and post2 (after 1 h) in both conditions, and brain activity was measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. The rate of the ball-rotation task improved significantly at post1 and post2 in the VMI condition than in the action observation condition. VMI condition lowers left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and right premotor area activity from post1 to pre compared to the action observation condition. In conclusion, VMI effectively aids early stages of motor learning in healthy individuals.

A Novel Paired Somatosensory-Cerebellar Stimulation Induces Plasticity on Cerebellar-Brain Connectivity

The cerebellum receives and integrates a large amount of sensory information that is important for motor coordination and learning. The aim of the present work was to investigate whether peripheral nerve and cerebellum paired associative stimulation (cPAS) could induce plasticity in both the cerebellum and the cortex. In a cross-over design, we delivered right median nerve electrical stimulation 25 or 10 ms before applying transcranial magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum. We assessed changes in motor evoked potentials (MEP), somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP), short-afferent inhibition (SAI), and cerebellum-brain inhibition (CBI) immediately, and 30 min after cPAS. Our results showed a significant reduction in CBI 30 minutes after cPAS, with no discernible changes in MEP, SEP, and SAI. Notably, cPAS10 did not produce any modulatory effects on these parameters. In summary, cPAS25 demonstrated the capacity to induce plasticity effects in the cerebellar cortex, leading to a reduction in CBI. This novel intervention may be used to modulate plasticity mechanisms and motor learning in healthy individuals and patients with neurological conditions.

BDNF Val66Met Polymorphism Is Associated With Motor Recovery After Rehabilitation in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Patients.

BackgroundRehabilitation is fundamental for progressive multiple sclerosis (MS), but predictive biomarkers of motor recovery are lacking, making patient selection difficult. Motor recovery depends on synaptic plasticity, in which the Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) is a key player, through its binding to the Neurotrophic-Tyrosine Kinase-2 (NTRK2) receptor. Therefore, genetic polymorphisms in the BDNF pathway may impact motor recovery. The most well-known polymorphism in BDNF gene (rs6265) causes valine to methionine substitution (Val66Met) and it influences memory and motor learning in healthy individuals and neurodegenerative diseases. To date, no studies have explored whether polymorphisms in BDNF or NTRK2 genes may impact motor recovery in MS.ObjectivesTo assess whether genetic variants in BDNF and NTRK2 genes affect motor recovery after rehabilitation in progressive MS.MethodsThe association between motor recovery after intensive neurorehabilitation and polymorphisms in BDNF (rs6265) and NTKR2 receptor (rs2289656 and rs1212171) was assessed using Six-Minutes-Walking-Test (6MWT), 10-Metres-Test (10MT) and Nine-Hole-Peg-Test (9HPT) in 100 progressive MS patients.ResultsWe observed greater improvement at 6MWT after rehabilitation in carriers of the BDNF Val66Met substitution, compared to BDNF Val homozygotes (p = 0.024). No significant association was found for 10MT and 9HPT. NTRK2 polymorphisms did not affect the results of motor function tests.ConclusionBDNF Val66Met was associated with walking function improvement after rehabilitation in progressive MS patients. This result is in line with previous evidence showing a protective effect of Val66Met substitution on brain atrophy in MS. Larger studies are needed to explore its potential as a predictive biomarker of rehabilitation outcome.

Brain and Body: A Review of Central Nervous System Contributions to Movement Impairments in Diabetes.

Diabetes is associated with a loss of somatosensory and motor function, leading to impairments in gait, balance, and manual dexterity. Data-driven neuroimaging studies frequently report a negative impact of diabetes on sensorimotor regions in the brain; however, relationships with sensorimotor behavior are rarely considered. The goal of this review is to consider existing diabetes neuroimaging evidence through the lens of sensorimotor neuroscience. We review evidence for diabetes-related disruptions to three critical circuits for movement control: the cerebral cortex, the cerebellum, and the basal ganglia. In addition, we discuss how central nervous system (CNS) degeneration might interact with the loss of sensory feedback from the limbs due to peripheral neuropathy to result in motor impairments in individuals with diabetes. We argue that our understanding of movement impairments in individuals with diabetes is incomplete without the consideration of disease complications in both the central and peripheral nervous systems. Neuroimaging evidence for disrupted central sensorimotor circuitry suggests that there may be unrecognized behavioral impairments in individuals with diabetes. Applying knowledge from the existing literature on CNS contributions to motor control and motor learning in healthy individuals provides a framework for hypothesis generation for future research on this topic.

A short bout of high-intensity exercise alters ipsilesional motor cortical excitability post-stroke

ABSTRACTBackground: Acute exercise can increase motor cortical excitability and enhance motor learning in healthy individuals, an effect known as exercise priming. Whether it has the same effects in people with stroke is unclear.Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate whether a short, clinically-feasible high-intensity exercise protocol can increase motor cortical excitability in non-exercised muscles of chronic stroke survivors.Methods: Thirteen participants with chronic, unilateral stroke participated in two sessions, at least one week apart, in a crossover design. In each session, they underwent either high-intensity lower extremity exercise or quiet rest. Motor cortical excitability of the extensor carpi radialis muscles was measured bilaterally with transcranial magnetic stimulation before and immediately after either exercise or rest. Motor cortical excitability changes (post-exercise or rest measures normalized to pre-test measures) were compared between exercise vs. rest conditions.Results: All participants were able to reach the target high-intensity exercise level. Blood lactate levels increased significantly after exercise (p < .001, d = 2.85). Resting motor evoked potentials from the lesioned hemisphere increased after exercise (mean 1.66; 95% CI: 1.19, 2.13) compared to the rest condition (mean 1.23; 95% CI: 0.64, 1.82), p = .046, d = 2.76, but this was not the case for the non-lesioned hemisphere (p = .406, d = 0.25).Conclusions: High-intensity exercise can increase lesioned hemisphere motor cortical excitability in a non-exercised muscle post-stroke. Our short and clinically-advantageous exercise protocol shows promise as a potential priming method in stroke rehabilitation.

Abstract #67: Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Learning in Healthy Individuals

Abstract #67: Effect of Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Motor Learning in Healthy Individuals

Can Daytime Napping Assist the Process of Skills Acquisition After Stroke?

Acquisition and reacquisition of skills is a main pillar of functional recovery after stroke. Nighttime sleep has a positive influence on motor learning in healthy individuals, whereas the effect of daytime sleep on neuro-rehabilitative training and relearning of the trained skills is often neglected. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between daytime sleep (napping) and the ability to learn a new visuomotor task in chronic stroke patients. The main hypothesis was that sleep enhances motor memory consolidation after training resulting in better motor performance after a period of daytime sleep. Thirty stroke survivors completed the study. They were randomized to one of three different conditions (i) wakeful resting, (ii) short nap (10–20 min), or (iii) long nap (50–80 min). All individuals trained the task with the contralesional, stroke-impaired hand, behavioral evaluation was performed after the break time (wake, nap), and 24 h later. Patients demonstrated a significant task-related behavioral improvement throughout the training. In contrast to the main hypothesis, there was no evidence for sleep-dependent motor consolidation early after the initial, diurnal break, or after an additional full night of sleep. In a secondary analysis, the performance changes of stroke survivors were compared with those of a group of healthy older adults who performed the identical task within the same experimental setup with their non-dominant hand. Performance levels were comparable between both cohorts at all time points. Stroke-related difficulties in motor control did not impact on the degree of performance improvement through training and daytime sleep did not impact on the behavioral gains in the two groups. In summary, the current study indicates that one-time daytime sleep after motor training does not influence behavioral gains.

Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over lower limb primary motor cortex on motor learning in healthy individuals.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulatory technique which alters motor functions in healthy humans and in neurological patients. Most studies so far investigated the effects of tDCS on mechanisms underlying improvements in upper limb performance. To investigate the effect of anodal tDCS over the lower limb motor cortex (M1) on lower limb motor learning in healthy volunteers, we conducted a randomized, single-blind and sham-controlled study. Thirty-three (25.81±3.85, 14 female) volunteers were included, and received anodal or sham tDCS over the left M1 (M1-tDCS); 0.0625mA/cm2 anodal tDCS was applied for 15min during performance of a visuo-motor task (VMT) with the right leg. Motor learning was monitored for performance speed and accuracy based on electromyographic recordings. We also investigated the influence of electrode size and baseline responsivity to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on the stimulation effects. Relative to baseline measures, only M1-tDCS applied with small electrodes and in volunteers with high baseline sensitivity to TMS significantly improved VMT performance. The computational analysis showed that the small anode was more specific to the targeted leg motor cortex volume when compared to the large anode. We conclude that anodal M1-tDCS modulates VMT performance in healthy subjects. As these effects critically depend on sensitivity to TMS and electrode size, future studies should investigate the effects of intensified tDCS and/or model-based different electrode positions in low-sensitivity TMS individuals.

Neurochemical changes underpinning the development of adjunct therapies in recovery after stroke: A role for GABA?

Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability, with around three-quarters of stroke survivors experiencing motor problems. Intensive physiotherapy is currently the most effective treatment for post-stroke motor deficits, but much recent research has been targeted at increasing the effects of the intervention by pairing it with a wide variety of adjunct therapies, all of which aim to increase cortical plasticity, and thereby hope to maximize functional outcome. Here, we review the literature describing neurochemical changes underlying plasticity induction following stroke. We discuss methods of assessing neurochemicals in humans, and how these measurements change post-stroke. Motor learning in healthy individuals has been suggested as a model for stroke plasticity, and we discuss the support for this model, and what evidence it provides for neurochemical changes. One converging hypothesis from animal, healthy and stroke studies is the importance of the regulation of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA for the induction of cortical plasticity. We discuss the evidence supporting this hypothesis, before finally summarizing the literature surrounding the use of adjunct therapies such as non-invasive brain stimulation and SSRIs in post-stroke motor recovery, both of which have been show to influence the GABAergic system.

Transcranial direct current stimulation over multiple days enhances motor performance of a grip task

BackgroundRecovery of handgrip is critical after stroke since it is positively related to upper limb function. To boost motor recovery, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising, non-invasive brain stimulation technique for the rehabilitation of persons with stroke. When applied over the primary motor cortex (M1), tDCS has been shown to modulate neural processes involved in motor learning. However, no studies have looked at the impact of tDCS on the learning of a grip task in both stroke and healthy individuals. ObjectiveTo assess the use of tDCS over multiple days to promote motor learning of a grip task using a learning paradigm involving a speed-accuracy tradeoff in healthy individuals. MethodsIn a double-blinded experiment, 30 right-handed subjects (mean age: 22.1±3.3 years) participated in the study and were randomly assigned to an anodal (n=15) or sham (n=15) stimulation group. First, subjects performed the grip task with their dominant hand while following the pace of a metronome. Afterwards, subjects trained on the task, at their own pace, over 5 consecutive days while receiving sham or anodal tDCS over M1. After training, subjects performed de novo the metronome-assisted task. The change in performance between the pre and post metronome-assisted task was used to assess the impact of the grip task and tDCS on learning. ResultsAnodal tDCS over M1 had a significant effect on the speed-accuracy tradeoff function. The anodal tDCS group showed significantly greater improvement in performance (39.28±15.92%) than the sham tDCS group (24.06±16.35%) on the metronome-assisted task, t(28)=2.583, P=0.015 (effect size d=0.94). ConclusionsAnodal tDCS is effective in promoting grip motor learning in healthy individuals. Further studies are warranted to test its potential use for the rehabilitation of fine motor skills in stroke patients.

Differential effects of primary motor cortex and cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning in healthy individuals: A randomized double-blind sham-controlled study

The purpose of study was to compare the effect of primary motor cortex (M1) and cerebellar anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) on online and offline motor learning in healthy individuals. Fifty-nine healthy volunteers were randomly divided into three groups (n=20 in two experimental groups and n=19 in sham-control group). One experimental group received M1a-tDCSand another received cerebellar a-tDCS. The main outcome measure were response time (RT) and number of errors during serial response time test (SRTT) which were assessed prior, 35min and 48h after the interventions. Reduction of response time (RT) and error numbers at last block of the test compared to the first block was considered online learning. Comparison of assessments during retention tests was considered as short-term and long-term offline learning. Online RT reduction was not different among groups (P>0.05), while online error reduction was significantly greater in cerebellar a-tDCS than sham-control group (P<0.017). Moreover, a-tDCS on both M1 and cerebellar regions produced more long-term offline learning as compared to sham tDCS (P<0.01), while short-term offline RT reduction was significantly greater in M1a-tDCS than sham-control group (P<0.05). The findings indicated that although cerebellar a-tDCS enhances online learning and M1a-tDCS has more effect on short-term offline learning, both M1 and cerebellar a-tDCS can be used as a boosting technique for improvement of offline motor learning in healthy individuals.

Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning in healthy individuals: a systematic review

Introduction Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used to modify cortical excitability and promote motor learning. Objective To systematically review published data to investigate the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on motor learning in healthy individuals. Methods Randomized or quasi-randomized studies that evaluated the tDCS effects on motor learning were included and the risk of bias was examined by Cochrane Collaboration’s tool. The following electronic databases were used: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, CINAHL with no language restriction. Results It was found 160 studies; after reading the title and abstract, 17 of those were selected, but just 4 were included. All studies involved healthy, right-handed adults. All studies assessed motor learning by the Jebsen Taylor Test or by the Serial Finger Tapping Task (SFTT). Almost all studies were randomized and all were blinding for participants. Some studies presented differences at SFTT protocol. Conclusion The result is insufficient to draw conclusions if tDCS influences the motor learning. Furthermore, there was significant heterogeneity of the stimulation parameters used. Further researches are needed to investigate the parameters that are more important for motor learning improvement and measure whether the effects are long-lasting or limited in time.

Modulation of motor performance and motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has shown preliminary success in improving motor performance and motor learning in healthy individuals, and restitution of motor deficits in stroke patients. This brief review highlights some recent work. Within the past years, behavioural studies have confirmed and specified the timing and polarity specific effects of tDCS on motor skill learning and motor adaptation. There is strong evidence that timely co-application of (hand/arm) training and anodal tDCS to the contralateral M1 can improve motor learning. Improvements in motor function as measured by clinical scores have been described for combined tDCS and training in stroke patients. For this purpose, electrode montages have been modified with respect to interhemispheric imbalance after brain injury. Cathodal tDCS applied to the unlesioned M1 or bihemispheric M1 stimulation appears to be well tolerated and useful to induce improvements in motor function. Mechanistic studies in humans and animals are discussed with regard to physiological motor learning. tDCS is well tolerated, easy to use and capable of inducing lasting improvements in motor function. This method holds promise for the rehabilitation of motor disabilities, although acute studies in patients with brain injury are so far lacking.

Augmented visual feedback in second language learning: Training Japanese post-alveolar flaps to American English speakers

Recent studies suggest beneficial effects of kinematic feedback in the articulatory training of individuals with speech disorders [Katz et al. (2002)]. To better understand the nature of speech motor learning in healthy individuals, the present study examines how adult monolingual speakers of American English learn to produce a non‐native consonant: The Japanese post‐alveolar flap. Eight participants were randomly assigned to one of two training groups: (1) Conventional L2 training, and (2) conventional L2 training with electromagnetic articulography (EMA)‐based kinematic feedback on tongue tip position. Participants completed three baseline recording sessions, eight training sessions, and two post‐training sessions (four weeks after training). During training, participants practiced a total of 16 disyllabic non‐words containing the post‐alveolar flap in word‐initial or word‐medial position. Participants practiced trained words 20× in blocked fashion, with summarized oral feedback given after every five repetitions. The data were analyzed in terms of flap consonant duration. Preliminary results indicate: (1) Before training, participants produced longer flap durations than native Japanese speakers; (2) with training, flap durations approximated native norms; and (3) kinematic feedback with EMA appears to facilitate the acquisition of novel speech sound production.