Mortality For Open Repair Research Articles

Differential impacts of clinical, anatomical, and procedural factors on early and late mortality following open thoracoabdominal aortic repair: a retrospective observational study

BackgroundThe operative outcomes of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) are challenged by high operative mortality and disabling complications. This study aimed to explore the baseline clinical, anatomical, and procedural risk factors that impact early and late outcomes following open repair of TAAAs.MethodsWe reviewed the medical records of 290 patients who underwent open repair of TAAAs between 1992 and 2020 at a tertiary referral center. Determinants of early mortality (within 30 days or in hospital) were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression models, while those of overall follow-up mortality were explored using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models and landmark analyses.ResultsThe rates of early mortality and spinal cord deficits were 13.1% and 11.0%, respectively, with Crawford extent II showing the highest rates. In the logistic regression models, older age (P < 0.001), high cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time (P < 0.001), and low surgical volume of the surgeon (P < 0.001) emerged as independent factors significantly associated with early mortality. During follow-up (median, 5.0 years; interquartile range, 1.1–7.6 years), 82 late deaths occurred (5.7%/patient-year). Cox proportional hazards models demonstrated that older age (P < 0.001) and low hemoglobin level (P = 0.032) were significant risk factors of overall mortality, while the landmark analyses revealed that the significant impacts of low surgical volume (P = 0.017), high CPB time (P = 0.002), and Crawford extent II (P = 0.017) on mortality only remained in the early postoperative period, without significant late impacts (all P > 0.05).ConclusionThere were differential temporal impacts of perioperative risk variables on mortality in open repair of TAAAs, with older age and low hemoglobin level having significant impacts throughout the postoperative period, and low surgical volume, high CPB time, and Crawford extent II having impacts in the early postoperative phase.

Risk factors of 30-day and long-term mortality and outcomes in open repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm

BackgroundOpen repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) was characterized by significant risk of postoperative mortality and morbidity. The aim of this study was to determine the perioperative predictors of early and long-term mortality in patients undergoing open repair of TAAA. Besides, the postoperative outcomes in patients with open repair of TAAA were described.MethodsThis is a single-center retrospective study, and 146 patients with open repair of TAAA from January 4, 2011, to November 22, 2018 was involved. Categorical variables were analyzed by the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, and continuous variables were analyzed by the independent sample t-test and the WilCoxon rank-sum test. Multivariate Logistic regression and Cox regression were applied to identify the predictors of 30-day and long-term mortality, respectively. The Kaplan Meier curves were used to illustrate survival with the Log-rank test.ResultsThe 30-day mortality was 9.59% (n = 14). Older than 50 years, the intraoperative volume of red blood cell (RBC) and epinephrine use were independently associated with postoperative 30-day mortality in open repair of TAAA. Long-term mortality was 17.12% (n = 25) (median of 3.5 years (IQR = 2–5 years) of follow-up). Prior open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair, aortic cross-clamping (ACC) time, intraoperative volume of RBC and use of epinephrine were independently correlated with long-term mortality.ConclusionsIdentifying perioperative risk factors of early and long-term mortaliy is crucial for surgeons. Intraoperative volume of RBC and use of epinephrine were predictors of both early and long-term mortality. In addition, patients of advanced age, prior open repair of TAAA and prolonged ACC time should be paid more attention.

Risk Factors Affecting Morbidity and Mortality in Open Repair of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Retrospective Cohort Study in the University of the Philippines Philippine General Hospital

Risk Factors Affecting Morbidity and Mortality in Open Repair of Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Retrospective Cohort Study in the University of the Philippines Philippine General Hospital

Acute Versus Subacute Endovascular Repair for Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissections

Uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD) was historically managed nonoperatively with strict impulse control and close monitoring owing to the high morbidity and mortality of open repair. However, thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has recently emerged as a viable option due to the potential for inducing more favorable aortic remodeling. The aim of this study is to compare outcomes of uncomplicated TBAD treated medically or with TEVAR in either the acute (1-14 days) or subacute period (2 weeks to 3 months).

Vascular Surgery in Japan: 2016 Annual Report by the Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery.

Objectives: This is an annual report indicating the number and early clinical results of annual vascular treatment performed by vascular surgeon in Japan in 2016, as analyzed by database management committee (DBC) members of the JSVS.Materials and Methods: To survey the current status of vascular treatments performed by vascular surgeons in Japan, the DBC members of the JSVS analyzed the vascular treatment data provided by the National Clinical Database (NCD), including the number of treatments and early results such as operative and hospital mortality.Results: In total 136,414 vascular treatments were registered by 1,070 institutions in 2016. This database is composed of 7 fields including treatment of aneurysms, chronic arterial occlusive disease, acute arterial occlusive disease, vascular injury, complication of previous vascular reconstruction, venous diseases, and other vascular treatments. The number of vascular treatments in each field was 21,653, 17,560, 4,983, 2,557, 846, 54,462 and 34,353, respectively. In the field of aneurysm treatment, 19,144 cases of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) including common iliac aneurysm were registered, and 60.3% were treated by endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Among AAA cases, 1,714 (9.4%) cases were registered as ruptured AAA. The operative mortality of ruptured and unruptured AAA was 15.7%, and 0.6%, respectively. 35.9% of ruptured AAA were treated by EVAR, and the EVAR ratio was gradually increasing, but the operative mortality of open repair and EVAR for ruptured AAA was 15.8%, and 15.3%, respectively. Regarding chronic arterial occlusive disease, open repair was performed in 9,303 cases, including 1,329 distal bypasses to the crural or pedal artery, whereas endovascular treatment (EVT) was performed in 8,257 cases. The EVT ratio was gradually increased at 47.0%. The number of varicose vein treatment tremendously increased to 52,639, and 68.5% of the cases were treated by endovenous laser ablations (EVLA). Regarding other vascular operations, 32,779 cases of vascular access operations and 1,411 lower limb amputation surgeries were included.Conclusions: The number of vascular treatments increased since 2011, and the proportion of endovascular procedures increased in almost all field of vascular diseases, especially EVAR for AAA, EVT for chronic arterial occlusive disease, and EVLA for varicose veins. (This is a translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2021; 30: 23–41.)

Vascular Surgery in Japan: 2015 Annual Report by the Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery.

Objectives: This is an annual report indicating the number and early clinical results of annual vascular treatment performed by vascular surgeon in Japan in 2015, as analyzed by database management committee (DBC) members of the JSVS.Materials and Methods: To survey the current status of vascular treatments performed by vascular surgeons in Japan, the DBC members of the JSVS analyzed the vascular treatment data provided by the National Clinical Database (NCD), including the number of treatments and early results such as operative and hospital mortality.Results: In total 124,299 vascular treatments were registered by 1,038 institutions in 2015. This database is composed of 7 fields including treatment of aneurysms, chronic arterial occlusive disease, acute arterial occlusive disease, vascular injury, complication of previous vascular reconstruction, venous diseases, and other vascular treatments. The number of vascular treatments in each field was 22,041, 15,671, 4,779, 2,313, 857, 48,837, and 29,801, respectively. In the field of aneurysm treatment, 18,907 cases of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) including common iliac aneurysm were registered, and 57.6% were treated by endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Among AAA cases, 1,850 (9.8%) cases were registered as ruptured AAA. The operative mortality of ruptured and un-ruptured AAA was 16.0%, and 0.6%, respectively. 33.6% of ruptured AAA were treated by EVAR, and the EVAR ratio was gradually increasing, but the operative mortality of open repair and EVAR for ruptured AAA was 16.6%, and 14.5%, respectively. Regarding chronic arterial occlusive disease, open repair was performed in 8,230 cases, including 1,194 distal bypasses to the crural or pedal artery, whereas endovascular treatment (EVT) was performed in 7,441 cases. The EVT ratio was gradually increased at 47.4%. Venous treatment including 47,046 cases with varicose vein treatments and 531 cases with lower limb deep vein thrombosis were registered. Regarding other vascular operations, 29,801 cases of vascular access operations and 1,511 lower limb amputation surgeries were included.Conclusions: The number of vascular treatments increased since 2011, and the proportion of endovascular procedures increased in almost all field of vascular diseases, especially EVAR for AAA, EVT for chronic arterial occlusive disease, and endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) for varicose veins. (This is a translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2020; 29: 161–179.)

Mortality is High Following Elective Open Repair of Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Objective To evaluate the 30 day mortality of elective open complex abdominal aortic aneurysm (cAAA) repair and identify factors associated with death. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study using a Targeted Vascular Module from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). All patients undergoing elective repair for juxta- and suprarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), or type IV thoraco-abdominal aneurysms (TAAA) from 2011 to 2017 were identified. Thirty day mortality and complication rates for open repair were established. A comparison endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) group was extracted from the same time period, and inverse probability weighting was applied for comparison. Logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with open repair mortality. Results Of the 957 patients who underwent an elective open cAAA repair over the study period, 65 (6.8%) died. The mean age of the patient was 71.3 ± 8.0 years. The distribution by aneurysm type was 605 juxtarenal AAA (28 deaths, 4.6%); 284 suprarenal AAA (16 deaths, 9.5%), and 68 type IV TAAA (10 deaths, 14.7%). During the same time period, there were 1149 endovascular repairs for cAAA, with 43 deaths (3.7%). After inverse probability weighting and weighted logistic regression, open repair 30 day mortality yielded an OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.1, p = .01 compared with EVAR. Factors independently associated with death included more proximal extent aneurysm (referent [ref]: juxtarenal: OR 2.0 per extent increase, 95% CI 1.4-3.0, p Conclusion The 30 day mortality was 4.6% for juxtarenal AAA, 9.5% for suprarenal AAA, and 14.7% for type IV TAAA. The open repair odds of 30 day mortality was nearly twice that of endovascular repair for cAAA. Independent associations with death included BMI

Vascular Surgery in Japan: 2014 Annual Report by the Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery.

Objectives: This is an annual report indicating the number and early clinical results of annual vascular treatment performed by vascular surgeon in Japan in 2014, as analyzed by database management committee (DBC) members of the JSVS.Materials and Methods: To survey the current status of vascular treatments performed by vascular surgeons in Japan, the DBC members of the JSVS analyzed the vascular treatment data provided by the National Clinical Database (NCD), including the number of treatments and early results such as operative and hospital mortality.Results: In total 113,296 vascular treatments were registered by 1,002 institutions in 2014. This database is composed of 7 fields including treatment of aneurysms, chronic arterial occlusive disease, acute arterial occlusive disease, vascular injury, complication of previous vascular reconstruction, venous diseases, and other vascular treatments. The number of vascular treatments in each field was 21,085, 14,344, 4,799, 2,088, 1,598, 42,864, and 26,518, respectively. In the field of aneurysm treatment, 17,973 cases of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) including common iliac aneurysm were registered, and 55.7% were treated by endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Among AAA cases, 1,824 (10.1%) cases were registered as ruptured AAA. The operative mortality of ruptured and un-ruptured AAA was 16.1%, and 0.6%, respectively. 32.1% of ruptured AAA were treated by EVAR, and the EVAR ratio was gradually increasing, but the operative mortality of open repair and EVAR for ruptured AAA was 15.7%, and 18.0%, respectively. Regarding chronic arterial occlusive disease, open repair was performed in 8,020 cases, including 1,210 distal bypasses to the crural or pedal artery, whereas endovascular treatment (EVT) were performed in 6,324 cases. The EVT ratio was gradually increased at 44.1%. Venous treatment including 41,246 cases with varicose vein treatments and 520 cases with lower limb deep vein thrombosis were registered. Regarding other vascular operations, 25,024 cases of vascular access operations and 1,322 lower limb amputation surgeries were included.Conclusions: The number of vascular treatments increased since 2011, and the proportion of endovascular procedures increased in almost all field of vascular diseases, especially EVAR for AAA, EVT for chronic arterial occlusive disease, and endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) for varicose veins. (This is a translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2020; 29: 15–31.)

Association between operation volume and postoperative mortality in the elective open repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms: systematic review

AbstractBackgroundAn inverse association between the case volume per hospital and surgeon and perioperative mortality has been shown for many surgical interventions. There are numerous studies on this issue for the open treatment of infrarenal aortic aneurysms.AimTo present the available data on the association between the case volume per hospital and surgeon and perioperative mortality in the elective open repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms in a systematic review.Materials and methodsUsing the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL, Current Contents Medicine (CCMed), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases, a systematic search was performed using defined keywords. From the search results, all original papers were included that compared the elective open repair of an infrarenal aortic aneurysm in a “high volume” center with a “low volume” center or by a “high volume” surgeon with a “low volume” surgeon, as defined in the respective study.ResultsAfter deduplication, the literature search yielded 1021 hits of which 60 publications met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 37/43 studies showed a lower mortality in “high volume” compared to “low volume” centers and 14/17 comparisons showed a lower mortality for “high volume” compared to “low volume” surgeons. The effect measures, usually odds ratios, ranged from 0.37 to 0.99 for volume per hospital and 0.31 to 0.92 for volume per surgeon. Regarding the threshold values for the definition of “high volume” and “low volume,” a clear heterogeneity was shown between the individual studies.DiscussionThe available data on the association between the case volume per hospital and surgeon and perioperative mortality in the elective open repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms show that interventions performed in “high volume” centers or by “high volume” surgeons are associated with lower mortality. To ensure the best possible outcome in terms of low perioperative mortality in the open repair of infrarenal aortic aneurysms, the aim should be centralization with high case volume per hospital and surgeon.

Hemoptysis is frequently fatal if blood comes directly from the aorta commentary.

Physicians throughout the world, across various specialties, are faced with diagnostic challenges of appropriately identifying the source of hemotosysis, which could range from a simple treatable infection, to the more ominous massive hemorrhage from the aorta requiring emergency, life saving surgery. Aortobronchopulmonary fistula, which is an abnormal communication between the thoracic aorta and the pulmonary tree, is an uncommon but often lethal condition if not promptly surgically intervened. Over the decades, the underlying cause has shifted, from primarily due to an aortic infection, such as tuberculosis, to now secondarily as a result of endovascular repair of the intrathoracic aorta. The best treatment modality, whether open surgical repair, endovascular management, or hybrid approach continues to be debated given the high operative morbidity and mortality of open repair and need to address the pulmonary communication, with optimal management still undetermined.

Editor's Choice – Mortality is High Following Elective Open Repair of Complex Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

To evaluate the 30 day mortality of elective open complex abdominal aortic aneurysm (cAAA) repair and identify factors associated with death. This was a retrospective cohort study using a Targeted Vascular Module from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). All patients undergoing elective repair for juxta- and suprarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), or type IV thoraco-abdominal aneurysms (TAAA) from 2011 to 2017 were identified. Thirty day mortality and complication rates for open repair were established. A comparison endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) group was extracted from the same time period, and inverse probability weighting was applied for comparison. Logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with open repair mortality. Of the 957 patients who underwent an elective open cAAA repair over the study period, 65 (6.8%) died. The mean age of the patient was 71.3±8.0 years. The distribution by aneurysm type was 605 juxtarenal AAA (28 deaths, 4.6%); 284 suprarenal AAA (16 deaths, 9.5%), and 68 type IV TAAA (10 deaths, 14.7%). During the same time period, there were 1149 endovascular repairs for cAAA, with 43 deaths (3.7%). After inverse probability weighting and weighted logistic regression, open repair 30 day mortality yielded an OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-3.1, p=.01 compared with EVAR. Factors independently associated with death included more proximal extent aneurysm (referent [ref]: juxtarenal: OR 2.0 per extent increase, 95% CI 1.4-3.0, p<.001), BMI<18.5 (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.6-10.1, p=.003), history of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.5-4.4, p=.001), more severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) (ref: none/mild): OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-2.8, p=.004), and age (OR 1.06/year, 95% CI 1.02-1.09, p=.002. The 30 day mortality was 4.6% for juxtarenal AAA, 9.5% for suprarenal AAA, and 14.7% for type IV TAAA. The open repair odds of 30 day mortality was nearly twice that of endovascular repair for cAAA. Independent associations with death included BMI <18.5, more severe CKD level, more proximally extending aneurysm, age, and history of advanced COPD.

Open Repair of Descending Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Meta-Analysis

Contemporary outcomes of open repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) and descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (DTAs) have not been analyzed in an inclusive meta-analysis. After a systematic literature search, studies from 2008 to 2018 reporting outcomes of open repair of DTAs or TAAAs were pooled in a single-arm meta-analysis performed using the generic inverse variance method. Primary outcome was operative mortality. Secondary outcomes were late mortality, postoperative stroke, permanent and temporary spinal cord injury, renal failure, respiratory failure, and myocardial infarction. Fifty-four studies with 12,245 patients were included. Pooled operative mortality for open repair was 10.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.3-12.8): 6.6% (95% CI, 3.7-11.6) for DTA and 10.5% (95% CI, 7.5-14.5) for TAAA. Pooled incidence rate of late mortality was 0.6% (95% CI, 0.5-0.8) per person-year. Pooled rates for postoperative outcomes were 4.9% (95% CI, 3.9-6.1) for stroke; 5.7% (95% CI, 4.3-7.5) and 3.0% (95% CI, 2.1-4.2) for permanent and temporary spinal cord injury, respectively; 13.2% (95% CI, 9.9-17.3) for renal failure; 23.3% (95% CI, 17.5-30.4) for respiratory failure; and 2.7% (95% CI, 1.8-4.1) for myocardial infarction. At metaregression, year of publication, use of the clamp-and-sew technique, and use of the cerebrospinal fluid drain were associated with lower operative mortality. Ruptured aneurysms were associated with higher operative mortality. Despite improvement, open repair of DTAs and TAAAs continues to be associated with a considerable risk for operative death and perioperative complications. Use of the cerebrospinal fluid drain is associated with better outcomes.

Vascular Surgery in Japan: 2013 Annual Report by the Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery.

Objectives: This is an annual report indicating the number and early clinical results of annual vascular treatment performed by vascular surgeon in Japan in 2013, as analyzed by database management committee (DBC) members of the JSVS.Materials and Methods: To survey the current status of vascular treatments performed by vascular surgeons in Japan, the DBC members of the JSVS analyzed the vascular treatment data provided by the National Clinical Database (NCD), including the number of treatments and early results such as operative and in-hospital mortality.Results: In total 100,470 vascular treatments were registered by 1,045 institutions in 2013. This database is composed of 7 fields including treatment of aneurysms, chronic arterial occlusive disease, acute arterial occlusive disease, vascular injury, complication of previous vascular reconstruction, venous diseases, and other vascular treatments. The number of vascular treatments in each field was 19,439, 13,276, 4,688, 1,563, 1,777, 37,643, and 23,971, respectively. In the field of aneurysm treatment, 16,694 cases of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) including common iliac aneurysm were registered, and 52.9% were treated by endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Among AAA cases, 1,598 (9.6%) cases were registered as ruptured AAA. The operative mortality of ruptured and un-ruptured AAA was 17.9%, and 1.0%, respectively. 25.5% of ruptured AAA were treated by EVAR, and the EVAR ratio was gradually increasing, but the operative mortality of open repair and EVAR for ruptured AAA was 16.1%, and 15.8%, respectively. Regarding chronic arterial occlusive disease, open repair was performed in 7,437 cases, including 1,121 distal bypasses to the crural or pedal artery, whereas endovascular treatment (EVT) were performed in 5,839 cases. The EVT ratio was gradually increased at 44.0%. Venous treatment including 35,986 cases with varicose vein treatments and 506 cases with lower limb deep vein thrombosis were registered. Regarding other vascular operations, 22,572 cases of vascular access operations and 1,185 amputation surgeries were included.Conclusions: The number of vascular treatments increased since 2011, and the proportion of endovascular procedures increased in almost all field of vascular diseases, especially EVAR for AAA, EVT for chronic arterial occlusive disease, and endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) for varicose veins. (This is a translation of Jpn J Vasc Surg 2019; 28: 273–292.)

Five-year results of endovascular aortic repair used according to instructions for use give a good general outcome for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Objectives:The primary aim of this study was to investigate the rate of sac enlargement and secondary procedures after 5 years when instructions for use are strictly applied with endovascular aortic repair. The secondary aim was to investigate if strict indications with endovascular aortic repair, rendering more open operations, would change the general outcome of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm.Materials and methods:Patients having their abdominal aortic aneurysm procedure in a single institution between 01 January 2002 and 31 December 2006 were included. Indications for endovascular aortic repair were as follows: aortic neck: length 15 mm or more, diameter 32 mm or less and straight configuration; iliac arteries: length > 10 mm, 7.5–20 mm in diameter. Sac enlargement was defined as an increase in diameter of 5 mm or more.Results:A total of 123 patients were intended to be treated electively with endovascular aortic repair from 2002 to 2007 using Cook Zenith stent grafts. In the same period, 147 patients were treated with elective open repair. At 5 years, 7.3% (N = 9) of the elective intended-to-treat patients with endovascular aortic repair had a sac enlargement. Thirty-five percent of the patients were registered with endoleaks, 13% of the patients had secondary procedures, 12.2% of the patients had early and 6.5% late complications during the follow-up period. Aneurysm rupture was seen in 1.6% of the patients. During the 5-year follow-up period, 34 (27.6%) of the endovascular aortic repair patients died. Five-year mortality for open repair was 23.8%, and 12.2% of the open repair patients had secondary procedures.Conclusion:Endovascular aortic repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm in accordance with instructions for use gives a low long-term risk for increased diameter and low rate of secondary procedures. There was similar mortality after elective endovascular aortic repair and open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Applying endovascular aortic repair according to instructions for use does not seem to change the general outcome of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm but improves the outcome with the method.

Mortality rates and risk factors for emergent open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in the endovascular era.

The background of this paper is to report the mortality at 30 and 90 days and at mean follow-up after open abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) emergent repair and to identify predictive risk factors for 30- and 90-day mortality. Between 1997 and 2002, 104 patients underwent emergent AAA open surgery. Symptomatic and ruptured AAAs were observed, respectively, in 21 and 79% of cases. Mean patient age was 70 (SD 9.2) years. Mean aneurysm maximal diameter was 7.4 (SD 1.6) cm. Primary endpoints were 30- and 90-day mortality. Significant mortality-related risk factor identification was the secondary endpoint. Open repair trend and its related perioperative mortality with a per-year analysis and a correlation subanalysis to identify predictive mortality factor were performed. Mean follow-up time was 23 (SD 23) months. Overall, 30-day mortality was 30%. Significant mortality-related risk factors were the use of computed tomography (CT) as a preoperative diagnostic tool, AAA rupture, preoperative shock, intraoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), use of aortic balloon occlusion, intraoperative massive blood transfusion (MBT), and development of abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). Previous abdominal surgery was identified as a protective risk factor. The mortality rate at 90 days was 44%. Significant mortality-related risk factors were AAA rupture, aortocaval fistula, peripheral artery disease (PAD), preoperative shock, CPR, MBT, and ACS. The mortality rate at follow-up was 45%. Correlation analysis showed that MBT, shock, and ACS are the most relevant predictive mortality factor at 30 and 90days. During the transition period from open to endovascular repair, open repair mortality outcomes remained comparable with other contemporary data despite a selection bias for higher risk patients. MBT, shock, and ACS are the most pronounced predictive mortality risk factors.

Increasing Mortality Trends for Open Infrarenal and Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm Repairs in the Endovascular Era

Rapid adoption of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been driven by improving trends in perioperative morbidity and mortality compared with open repair. Perioperative outcomes in the current era of anatomically more complex open repairs remain undetermined. The purpose of this study was to investigate trends for elective and ruptured aneurysm repairs and in-hospital mortality for these patients at a high-volume tertiary care, university teaching hospital. This study used an institutional, prospectively maintained database that derives all data from electronic hospital records, billing data, and patient charts to capture patients receiving either EVAR or open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAAs) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms during an 11-year period between January 2004 and January 2015. There were 2753 aneurysm repairs performed throughout the study period; 1673 (60.1%) were open repairs, whereas 1080 (39.2%) were EVAR. In 2004, 29 EVARs were performed (14.9% of total aneurysm repairs), increasing to 110 repairs in 2014 (46.8%; Fig 1). Linear regression demonstrated an 11-year average increase in EVAR of 10.5 cases per year (R2 = 0.68), whereas open repair decreased by 5.2 cases per year (R2 = 0.73). Percentage of ruptured AAA repairs decreased from 11.3% in 2004 to 6.0% in 2014 with an increasing proportion performed by EVAR (9.1% in 2004 and 35.7% in 2014). Mortality for EVAR decreased from 6.9% in 2004 to 0.9% in 2014, whereas open repair mortality increased from 2.4% in 2004 to 6.4% in 2014 (Fig 2). Respectively, average mortality for elective EVAR and open repair was 3.5% and 2.7% from 2004 to 2007, 0.9% and 1.8% from 2008 to 2011, and 1.6% and 5.6% from 2012 to 2014. There is an ongoing transition favoring EVAR over open repair in the management of AAAs and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms, albeit a slower rate of adoption at our center. Notably, there is an evident trend toward increasing mortality among patients receiving open repair. We postulate increasing patient complexity and possibly decreased institutional memory (factors related to surgeon, anesthesia, and intensive care unit experience) in the era of increasing endovascular and diminishing open repairs.Fig 2Mortality rate for intact abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) by procedure type and overall combined mortality.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)

High mortality rates after both open surgical and endovascular thoracic aortic interventions in patients with end-stage renal disease

BackgroundMorbidity and mortality have improved with the evolution of endovascular techniques (thoracic endovascular aortic repair [TEVAR]) for thoracic aortic disease, but results after aortic intervention in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) remain unclear. The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes of open and endovascular descending thoracic aortic repair in dialysis-dependent patients. MethodsWe identified 352 patients with ESRD on dialysis undergoing open repair (n = 136) or TEVAR (n = 216) of the thoracic aorta from 2005 to 2008 using the United States Renal Data System database. Acute presentation was defined as ruptured aneurysm, dissection, or traumatic injury; all other interventions were considered elective. End points were 30-day mortality, overall survival, rates of perioperative complications, and procedural trends over time. Between-group comparisons and survival analysis used standard statistical methods. Logistic regression and Cox regression were performed using multivariate analysis. ResultsTEVAR subjects were older than those undergoing open repair (68.2 ± 11.5 vs 60.8 ± 13.2 years; P < .001); no other demographics differed. There were 303 patients who had thoracic or thoracoabdominal aneurysms; 47 (13.4%) were ruptured on presentation. There were 44 patients (12.5%) who had aortic dissection and 5 (1.4%) with aortic trauma. Overall 30-day mortality was 21.3% (n = 75), and it was greater for open repair (n = 41 [30.1%]) than for TEVAR (n = 34 [15.7%]; P = .002). Elective 30-day mortality for open repair (n = 27 [29.3%]) was also greater than for TEVAR (n = 24 [14.3%]; P = .005). Those with acute presentation trended toward higher mortality for open repair (n = 14 [31.8%] vs n = 10 [15.7%]; P = .17). Respiratory failure was higher for open repair (n = 69 [50.7%] vs n = 56 [25.9%]; P < .001); postoperative stroke was higher with TEVAR (n = 21 [9.7%] vs n < 10 [<7%]; P = .02). Estimated 1-year survival was 50% and did not differ between groups (44% for open repair, 53% for TEVAR). In multivariate analysis, TEVAR decreased odds of 30-day mortality compared with open repair (odds ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.71) but failed to demonstrate long-term survival advantage. ConclusionsIn ESRD patients, TEVAR provides short-term mortality benefits compared with open repair, but long-term mortality remains high regardless of treatment modality. Elective intervention for thoracic aortic disease in this population remains high risk and should be approached with caution.

The impact of endovascular repair on management and outcome of ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysms

BackgroundThoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become an alternative to open repair for the treatment of ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysms (rTAAs). The aim of this study was to assess national trends in the use of TEVAR for the treatment of rTAA and to determine its impact on perioperative outcomes. MethodsPatients admitted with an rTAA between 1993 and 2012 were identified from the National Inpatient Sample. Patients were grouped in accordance with their treatment: TEVAR, open repair, or nonoperative treatment. The primary outcomes were treatment trends over time and in-hospital death. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications and length of stay. Trend analyses were performed using the Cochran-Armitage test for trend, and adjusted mortality risks were established using multivariable logistic regression analysis. ResultsA total of 12,399 patients were included, with 1622 (13%) undergoing TEVAR, 2808 (23%) undergoing open repair, and 7969 (64%) not undergoing surgical treatment. TEVAR has been increasingly used from 2% of total admissions in 2003-2004 to 43% in 2011-2012 (P < .001). Concurrently, there was a decline in the proportion of patients undergoing open repair (29% to 12%; P < .001) and nonoperative treatment (69% to 45%; P < .001). The proportion of patients undergoing surgical repair has increased for all age groups since 1993-1994 (P < .001 for all) but was most pronounced among those aged 80 years with a 7.5-fold increase. After TEVAR was introduced, procedural mortality decreased from 36% in 2003-2004 to 27% in 2011-2012 (P < .001); mortality among those undergoing nonoperative treatment remained stable between 63% and 60% (P = .167). Overall mortality after rTAA admission decreased from 55% to 42% (P < .001). Since 2005, mortality for open repair was 33% and 22% for TEVAR (P < .001). In adjusted analysis, open repair was associated with a twofold higher mortality than TEVAR (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-2.5). ConclusionsTEVAR has replaced open repair as primary surgical treatment for rTAA. The introduction of endovascular treatment appears to have broadened the eligibility of patients for surgical treatment, particularly among the elderly. Mortality after rTAA admission has declined since the introduction of TEVAR, which is the result of improved operative mortality as well as the increased proportion of patients undergoing surgical repair.

Commentary on ‘Endovascular Versus Open Repair as Primary Strategy for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A National Population-based Study’

The optimal choice between endovascular (EVAR) and open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is a highly controversial and debated subject. Some real-world observational studies indicate more favorable periprocedural outcomes with EVAR, as might be expected with case selection. Conversely, several prospective randomized studies of EVAR versus open repair show equivalent periprocedural mortality, but by their design they are not all inclusive. The study by Gunnavasson et al. is based on an inclusive nationwide registry (Swedish Vascular Registry). 1 Essentially, they found no difference in overall mortality at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years between centers with a preference for EVAR and those with a preference for open repair. This report has value not only because of reliable midterm mortality data, but also because of the spectrum of preference for EVAR or for open repair between centers for patients with rAAA. The authors divided the 29 vascular surgery centers into the three performing more EVAR than open repairs (176/236 procedures EVAR [75%], all referral academic centers) and the 26 centers with a preference for open repair (901/1,068 procedures open repair [84%]). Key results given in Table 3 in the original article report that centers with a preference for EVAR had a higher mortality rate than those with a preference for open repair at 30 days, 1 year, and 2 years for both open repair and EVAR. How and why is it that these two diverse center subsets have, in general, overall equivalent mortality outcomes? This is of particular interest for 30-day mortality, where prior observational studies favor EVAR. One might assume that this is due to the fewer number of patients in the centers with a preference for EVAR (n ¼ 236) than in those with a preference for open (n ¼ 1,068), but that does not appear to be the case. A quick extrapolation of the results, based on an equal number of patients (n ¼ 652) in each preference group and the same percentages of 30-day mortality for both procedures in the two center groups (as given in Table 3 in the original article), predicts an overall mortality of 27.5% for centers with a preference for EVAR and 27.1% for those with a preference for open repair. With regard to 30-day mortality, this is very close to the 28.0% for EVAR centers and 27.4% for open centers (given in Table 3 in the original article). Diverse sample size is not the explanation. The answer to this puzzle may well be the wide spectrum of mortality risk between patients. The primary EVAR centers possibly used open repair (25% of patients) primarily for hemodynamically unstable patients, clearly a high-risk group, while using EVAR (75% of patients) in some patients with adverse neck anatomy. In contrast, the primary open centers were highly selective for EVAR (16% of patients) giving very good outcomes, much lower than the EVAR preference centers, as well as lower open repair mortality possibly due to inclusion of more patients at lower risk.The ratios of patients selected for EVAR versus open repair were far apart in the two preference groups (3:1 for EVAR centers vs. 1:5 for open centers). Perhaps both preference extremes place some patients into a procedure that has a higher patient specific mortality risk than that of the alternative procedure. Differences in mortality risk between the two rAAA repair preference groups could balance out as overall equality of morbidity outcomes in this study. Could procedure ratios closer to 50:50 have a significantly lower mortality? Patient selection, patient mortality risk, and preference for a procedure are complex coupled variables that make it difficult to determine the optimum procedure choice to minimize the risk of mortality for patients with rAAA. While the near equality of 30-day, and 1- and 2-year mortality based on a wide spectrum of preference for EVAR or open repair in this study indicates that diverse center preference may make little difference in overall mortality outcomes, the results also indicate that preprocedure mortality risk may be an important variable that needs to be addressed and included. Perhaps future studies grouping rAAA patients by levels of preprocedure mortality risk score will identify one or more subset risk levels that have a projected significantly lower mortality with EVAR than with open repair, or vice versa. REFERENCE

The effect of aortic morphology on peri-operative mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

AimsTo investigate whether aneurysm shape and extent, which indicate whether a patient with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is eligible for endovascular repair (EVAR), influence the outcome of both EVAR and open surgical repair.Methods and resultsThe influence of six morphological parameters (maximum aortic diameter, aneurysm neck diameter, length and conicality, proximal neck angle, and maximum common iliac diameter) on mortality and reinterventions within 30 days was investigated in rAAA patients randomized before morphological assessment in the Immediate Management of the Patient with Rupture: Open Versus Endovascular strategies (IMPROVE) trial. Patients with a proven diagnosis of rAAA, who underwent repair and had their admission computerized tomography scan submitted to the core laboratory, were included. Among 458 patients (364 men, mean age 76 years), who had either EVAR (n = 177) or open repair (n = 281) started, there were 155 deaths and 88 re-interventions within 30 days of randomization analysed according to a pre-specified plan. The mean maximum aortic diameter was 8.6 cm. There were no substantial correlations between the six morphological variables. Aneurysm neck length was shorter in those undergoing open repair (vs. EVAR). Aneurysm neck length (mean 23.3, SD 16.1 mm) was inversely associated with mortality for open repair and overall: adjusted OR 0.72 (95% CI 0.57, 0.92) for each 16 mm (SD) increase in length. There were no convincing associations of morphological parameters with reinterventions.ConclusionShort aneurysm necks adversely influence mortality after open repair of rAAA and preclude conventional EVAR. This may help explain why observational studies, but not randomized trials, have shown an early survival benefit for EVAR.Clinical trial registration:ISRCTN 48334791.