Nature's Man: Thomas Jefferson's Philosophical Anthropology Maurizio Valsania Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2013.Maurizio Valsania describes central core of Nature's Man: Thomas Jefferson's Philosophical Anthropology presenting Jefferson's philosophical anthropology concretely, (Chapter Two) forming body (Jefferson's Communitarianism) cannot be split, and which two limbs are attached: theoretical (Chapter One) and (Chapter Three) consequences of communitarianism (10). Drawing on Carl Degler's image of past a jigsaw puzzle with missing pieces yet be added, Valsania views the past a series of layers and possibilities allowing multiple interpretations (11). To understand Jefferson's moral coherence, important words, capable of being defined in many ways, must be perfectly calibrated (8). book treats operative conceptual terms metaphors and descriptors that do not refer an absolute but should be treated as containers where content and meaning have be drawn each time from context (9). While preliminary chapter examines Jefferson's modernity, individualism, and degree of his break with tradition, Chapter Two presents Jefferson's complex communitarianism, and Chapter Three complicates modern readers' negative understanding of Jefferson's brutal system of exclusion (151).Jefferson inherited an extended cultural environment that included seventeenth century and intellectual hegemony (8) of eighteenth century. For his definition of modernity, and his understanding of communitarianism, he was indebted (47) many for his ideas, including Francis Bacon, Isaac Newton, and John Locke, earning epitaph of trinity of immortals by Jefferson (22), pessimist Thomas Hobbes (21), moralists Francis Hutcheson, Thomas Reid, Lord Karnes, and Richard Price (47), and much farther back, Jesus of first century C.E., epistemological sens ism from many, including Greek Epicurus, eighteenth century Condillac, La Mettrie, Helvetius, Diderot, and d' Holbach. Valsania says culture has marched consistently toward individualism (30), and Jefferson, framed within a society that was typically in-between [old and new (40)] evidences a paradox of and traditionalism (6). Traditionalism held a strong link between God and humans (13); modernity, on other hand, rebutted traditional hierarchy [humans higher than animals, man superior women, whites over blacks, pope over king, and kings and nobles over common sort (14)], and drove in direction of science and naturalism, and imbricated [human beings] in animality (5). Jefferson, nonetheless, like other eighteenth century figures, tried to turn tide of Enlightenment in direction of a modernized, minimalized Christianity (39). Thus, he viewed human beings naturalized and materialized (39), but, at same time, humans have implanted in their breasts... a moral sense (21) that becomes a foundation for morality. The postulate of a physical-moral parallelism [a moral sense] provided starting point Jefferson's moral reasoning and, more generally, one basis of his modernity (23). …
Read full abstract