Montreal Cognitive Assessment Items Research Articles

Hearing loss, hearing aid use, and performance on the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA): findings from the HUNT study in Norway.

To evaluate the associations between hearing status and hearing aid use and performance on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in older adults in a cross-sectional study in Norway. This study utilized data from the fourth wave of the Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT4, 2017-2019). Hearing thresholds at frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz (or PTA4) in the better hearing ear were used to determine participants' hearing status [normal hearing (PTA4 hearing threshold, ≤ 15 dB), or slight (PTA4, 16-25 dB), mild (PTA4, 26-40 dB), moderate (PTA4, 41-55 dB), or severe (PTA4, ≥ 56 dB) hearing loss]. Both standard scoring and alternate MoCA scoring for people with hearing loss (deleting MoCA items that rely on auditory function) were used in data analysis. The analysis was adjusted for the confounders age, sex, education, and health covariates. The pattern of results for the alternate scoring was similar to that for standard scoring. Compared with the normal-hearing group, only individuals with moderate or severe hearing loss performed worse in the MoCA. In addition, people with slight hearing loss performed better in the MoCA than those with moderate or severe hearing loss. Within the hearing loss group, hearing aid use was associated with better performance in the MoCA. No interaction was observed between hearing aid use and participants' hearing status with performance on the MoCA test. While hearing loss was associated with poorer performance in the MoCA, hearing aid use was found to be associated with better performance in the MoCA. Future randomized control trials are needed to further examine the efficacy of hearing aid use on the MoCA performance. When compared with standard scoring, the alternate MoCA scoring had no effect on the pattern of results.

Cognitive Profiles Stratified by Education Using Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Parkinson's Disease Patients with Freezing of Gait.

Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with freezing of gait (FOG) may present with complex and heterogeneous cognitive profiles. Owing to limited access to comprehensive neuropsychological battery in ordinary clinical practice, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is likely to be easily available cognitive data for comparisons among studies. This study aims to explore the cognitive profiles stratified by education using MoCA in PD patients with FOG. PD patients with FOG (FOG+, n = 52) and without FOG (FOG-, n = 71) were included in our study. MoCA items were categorized into five subsections (attention/working memory, executive function, episodic memory, language, and visuospatial function) referring to previously published criteria. Cognitive assessments were compared based on five subsections between groups stratified by three education levels (0-6 years, 7-12 years, and >12 years). The association of cognitive measurements with FOG were analyzed using binary logistic regression models with adjustment for variables. The total scores and subscores of each subsection of MoCA were similar between two groups of each education level. Further detailed analysis showed that a composite measure labeled "Attention/working memory-Composite" (abbreviated to Attention-C), consisting of the scores of four items (target detection task, serial sevens, digit forward and backward, and sentence repetition), were lower significantly in FOG+ group compared with FOG- group in patients with education year ≤6 years. The significant association of Attention-C with FOG held true when controlling for disease duration, but not for H-Y stage, MDS-UPDRS III, HAMA, and HAMD. Overall, our findings gave a hint that Attention-C derived from MoCA might be a potential factor associated with FOG in PD patients with lower education level (education year ≤ 6 years), which will need to be validated in future studies.

Cognitive assessment in patients with acute COVID-19: A cross-sectional study

Purpose: Many reports have revealed a high percentage of patients suffering from cognitive impairment due to COVID-19. However, data are limited at the acute phase of COVID-19. We investigated cognitive functions using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in mild COVID-19 patients compared with non-COVID-19 patients within 5 days after the initial respiratory symptoms of infection.
 Materıals and Methods: 113 patients with mild COVID-19 and 109 age- and sex-matched controls were enrolled in this prospective cross-sectional study. Cognitive functions were evaluated using the MoCA.
 Results: We found that the MoCA scores were significantly lower in the COVID-19 patients than in the controls (P < 0.001). Compared with the controls, we found point deficits within some MoCA items such as visuospatial (P < 0.001), memory (P = 0.017), and attention (P < 0.048) domains. In the multivariate model, female sex (2.06 [1.02–4.16], P = 0.044), low education level (150.05 [5.16–43.90], P < 0.001), high fasting blood glucose level (0.98 [0.96–1.00], P = 0.043), and the presence of COVID-19 (24.24 [9.52–61.72], P < 0.001) were independently associated with cognitive impairment (OR, 95% CI).
 Conclusion: We detected cognitive dysfunction, involving the visuospatial domain, memory, and attention, during the acute phase in patients with mild COVID-19.

Development and validation of the Montreal cognitive assessment for people with hearing impairment (MoCA-H).

Hearing impairment is common among older adults and affects cognitive assessments for identification of dementia which rely on good hearing function. We developed and validated a version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for people with hearing impairment. We adapted existing MoCA 8.1 items for people with hearing impairment by presenting instructions and stimuli in written rather than spoken format. One Attention domain and two Language domain items required substitution by alternative items. Three and four candidate items respectively were constructed and field-tested along with the items adapted to written form. We used a combination of individual item analysis and item substitution to select the set of alternative items to be included in the final form of the MoCA-H in place of the excluded original items. We then evaluated the performance and reliability of the final tool, including making any required adjustments for demographic factors. One hundred and fifty-nine hearing-impaired participants, including 76 with normal cognition and 83 with dementia, completed the adapted version of the MoCA. A further 97 participants with normal hearing completed the standard MoCA as well as the novel items developed for the MoCA-H to assess score equivalence between the existing and alternative MoCA items and for independence from hearing impairment. Twenty-eight participants were retested between 2-4 weeks after initial testing. After the selection of optimal item set, the final MoCA-H had an area under the curve of 0.973 (95% CI 0.952-0.994). At a cut-point of 24 points or less sensitivity and specificity for dementia was 92.8% and 90.8%, respectively. The intraclass correlation for test-retest reliability was 0.92 (95%CI 0.78-0.97). The MoCA-H is a sensitive and reliable means of identifying dementia among adults with acquired hearing impairment.

Reliability of the NACC Telephone-administered Neuropsychological Battery (T-cog) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment for participants in the USC ADRC.

Restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic necessitated remote administration of neuropsychological testing. We assessed the test-retest reliability for a telephone-administered cognitive battery, recommended for use in the National Institute on Aging Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC). 64 participants in the University of Southern California ADRC clinical core underwent repeat telephone evaluation using the T-cog Neuropsychological Battery. Reliability was measured by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for continuous variables and weighted Kappa coefficient for categorical variables. Mean scores for Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) total and Craft Story 21 Immediate and Delayed Recall were compared using paired t tests. Mean age was 74.8 (8.3 standard deviation); 73.4% were female. ICCs ranged from 0.52 to 0.84, indicating moderate test-retest reliability except for number span backward, which showed poor reliability. Weighted Kappa for MoCA items ranged from -0.016 to 0.734; however, relatively good observed agreement was seen across all items (70.3% to 98.4%). Although MoCA total scores did not significantly change, Craft Story 21 Immediate and Delayed Recall mean scores increased between first and second administrations (P<0.0001). Test-retest reliability for the T-cog Neuropsychological Battery is adequate. The variation seen in testing is similar to results seen from face-to-face testing, with Craft Story 21 recall showing modest and expected practice effects. Moderate test-retest reliability is seen in most measures of the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Neuropsychological Test Battery and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.52 to 0.84, except for number Span backward.Weighted Kappa for MoCA items varied, but good observed agreement was seen.MoCA total mean score did not change significantly between administrations.Craft Story 21 Immediate and Delayed Recall means increased on repeat testing (P<0.0001).

Examining the Effects of Formal Education Level on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment.

Brief, global assessments such as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) are widely used in primary care for assessing cognition in older adults. Like other neuropsychological instruments, lower formal education can influence MoCA interpretation. METHODS: Data from 2 large studies of cognitive aging were used-Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) and National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC). Both use comprehensive examinations to determine cognitive status and have brain amyloid status for many participants. Mixed models were used to account for random variation due to data source. RESULTS: Cognitively intact participants with lower education (≤12 years) were more likely than those with higher education (>12 years) to be classified as potentially impaired using the MoCA cutoff of <26 (P < .01). Backwards selection revealed 4 MoCA items significantly associated with education (cube copy, serial subtraction, phonemic fluency, abstraction). Subtracting these items scores yielded an alternative MoCA score with a maximum of 24 and a cutoff of ≤19 for classifying participants with mild cognitive impairment. Using the alternative MoCA score and cutoff, among cognitively intact participants, both education groups were similarly likely to be classified as potentially impaired (P > .67). CONCLUSIONS: The alternative MoCA score neutralized the effects of formal education. Although further research is needed, this alternative score offers a simple procedure for interpreting MoCAs administered to older adults with ≤12 years education. These educational effects also highlight that the MoCA is part of the assessment process-not a singular diagnostic test-and a comprehensive workup is necessary to accurately diagnose cognitive impairments.

Longitudinal measurement properties of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment

ABSTRACT Introduction The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) has started to be used in longitudinal investigations to measure cognition trends but its measurement properties over time are largely unknown. This study aimed to examine the longitudinal measurement invariance of individual MoCA items. Method We used four waves of data collected between 2014 and 2017 from a cohort study on health and well-being of older adults from twelve public housing estates in Hong Kong. We identified people aged 65 years or older at baseline who answered the MoCA items across all time points and had a valid indicator of educational level. A total of 1028 participants were included. We applied confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables to examine measurement invariance of the Chinese (Cantonese) MoCA (version 7.0) items across four time points, stratified by educational level, where invariant items were identified by sequential model comparisons. Results Four items exhibited a lack of measurement invariance across the four time points in both education groups (Clock Hand, abstraction, Delayed Recall, and Orientation). The items Cube and Sentence Repetition lacked longitudinal measurement invariance only in the “some education” group and the items Clock Shape and Clock Number only in the “no education” group. However, accounting for the lack of measurement invariance did not substantially affect classification properties for major neurocognitive disorder and mild cognitive impairment. Conclusions Our findings support using MoCA to assess changes in cognition over time in the study population while calling for future research in other populations.

Examining the Effects of Formal Education Level on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment.

Brief, global assessments such as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) are widely used in primary care for assessing cognition in older adults. Like other neuropsychological instruments, lower formal education can influence MoCA interpretation. METHODS: Data from 2 large studies of cognitive aging were used-Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) and National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC). Both use comprehensive examinations to determine cognitive status and have brain amyloid status for many participants. Mixed models were used to account for random variation due to data source. RESULTS: Cognitively intact participants with lower education (≤12 years) were more likely than those with higher education (>12 years) to be classified as potentially impaired using the MoCA cutoff of <26 (P < .01). Backwards selection revealed 4 MoCA items significantly associated with education (cube copy, serial subtraction, phonemic fluency, abstraction). Subtracting these items scores yielded an alternative MoCA score with a maximum of 24 and a cutoff of ≤19 for classifying participants with mild cognitive impairment. Using the alternative MoCA score and cutoff, among cognitively intact participants, both education groups were similarly likely to be classified as potentially impaired (P > .67). CONCLUSIONS: The alternative MoCA score neutralized the effects of formal education. Although further research is needed, this alternative score offers a simple procedure for interpreting MoCAs administered to older adults with ≤12 years education. These educational effects also highlight that the MoCA is part of the assessment process-not a singular diagnostic test-and a comprehensive workup is necessary to accurately diagnose cognitive impairments.

Longitudinal Measurement Properties of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment

Background: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) has started to be widely used in longitudinal investigations to measure changes in cognition. However, the longitudinal measurement properties of MoCA have not been investigated. We aimed to examine the measurement invariance of individual MoCA items across four time points. Methods: We used longitudinal data collected between 2014 and 2017 from a cohort study on health and well-being of older adults in Hong Kong. The Cantonese version of the MoCA was used. We applied multiple group confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables to examine measurement invariance by educational level and across time points. Invariant items were identified by sequential model comparisons. Results: We included 1029 participants that answered MoCA items across all time points. We found that items Cube, Clock Hand and Clock Number had significantly different item parameters between participants with and without formal education at all time points. The selected model (RMSEA=0.031; SRMR=0.064) indicated that eight items (Trail, Cube, Clock Shape, Clock Number, Clock Hand, ion, Short-term Memory, and Orientation) did not exhibit measurement invariance over time. However, the differences in item parameter estimate over time were marginal. Accounting for the lack of measurement invariance did not substantially affect classification properties based on cutoff values at the 2nd ( major neurocognitive disorder) and 7th (mild cognitive impairment) percentile. Conclusion: Our findings support using MoCA to assess changes in cognition over time in the study population. Future research should examine the longitudinal measurement properties of the test in other populations with different characteristics.

Cognitive ability and motor performances in the elderly

Background/Aim. Aging entails a wide range of cognitive processes that are not independent of one another. It leads to changes in physical-motor characteristics and sometimes to disability. The aim of this study was to examine the association between multiple cognitive performances in elderly subjects and their physical-motor abilities. Method. The study included 98 elderly participants (60+) (16 males and 82 females). Cognitive abilities were assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)/Serbian version, and physical measures were assessed by the Senior Fitness Test with its five subtests, supplemented by the Walking Speed Test. Results. Several MoCA items demonstrated relatively low variability, i.e., they proved to be too easy for most of the participants. The participants exhibited the lowest performance on the memory relating to other domains, followed by executive functions, visuospatial skills, attention, concentration, and working memory domains, with the highest performance on temporal and spatial orientation relating to other domains. Executive functions and language correlated most significantly with physical strength. Agility and dynamic balance, lower- and upper-body strength, and aerobic endurance correlated moderately and positively. Conclusion. This study underlines the positive correlation between physical fitness and cognitive level in the elderly and emphasizes the importance of physical fitness for cognitive functions, especially those of executive type in elderly subjects. Clinicians should consider the association between cognitive function and physical-motor performances when dealing with functioning improvement in the elderly. The importance of designing the most efficient exercise pro-grams to achieve maximal somatic and cognitive effects is emphasized.

Additional Queen Square (QS) screening items improve the test accuracy of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) after acute stroke

BackgroundThe Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a popular cognitive screening tool used in stroke, but lacks sensitivity for detecting impairment in stroke-relevant domains of processing speed, non-verbal memory and executive functions. Our aim was to assess whether the test accuracy of the MoCA can be improved with additional tailored screening items targeting these three domains. MethodsWe included 196 patients admitted to an acute stroke unit at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square (QS), London. Participants completed the MoCA as well as a series of additional QS-screening items designed to assess speed of processing, non-verbal memory and executive functions. Performance on the MoCA and QS screening items was compared with performance on “gold standard” neuropsychological assessment. ResultsIn our sample, 22% of patients were classified as “cognitively intact” on the traditional MoCA alone (≥ 25). However, when tested on the QS-screening items, 40% of these patients failed on speed of processing, 56% failed on non-verbal memory and 26% failed on executive functions. Compared with neuropsychological assessment, the QS-screening items had good sensitivity (QS-Speed: 0.85; QS-Vis: 0.71; QS-EF: 0.73) and modest specificity (QS-Speed: 0.59; QS-Vis: 0.39; QS-EF: 0.54), regardless of stroke lateralisation. ConclusionAdditional screening items detected impairments in speed of processing, non-verbal memory and executive functions over and above those captured using the standard MoCA. The use of these QS-screening items improves the detection of post-stroke cognitive deficits in domains not adequately covered by the standard MoCA.

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment After Omission of Hearing-Dependent Subtests: Psychometrics and Clinical Recommendations.

Hearing loss (HL) is the third most common chronic health condition in older adults, yet it is often undiagnosed and/or untreated. Given the association between HL and cognitive impairment, it is expected that many people undergoing cognitive screening may have HL. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a brief screening test that assesses a wide range of cognitive functions sensitive to Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Although MoCA items were carefully designed to be sensitive to deficits in MCI, they were not designed to take sensory declines into account. In the current investigation, we examined the MoCA's psychometric properties following omission of subtests primarily dependent on hearing status (memory, digit span, attention to letters, and sentence repetition). Cross-sectional analytic design (retrospective analysis). We used the original MoCA validation study data.4 PARTICIPANTS: Groups consisted of healthy controls (N = 90), subjects with MCI (N = 94), and subjects with mild AD (N = 93). We assessed sensitivity and specificity using absolute and proportional cutoff score adjustments. We developed receiver operating characteristics curves to determine the best cutoff values for both MCI and AD patients using different combinations of auditory subtest omissions. Compared with the original MoCA (MCI sensitivity = 90%; specificity = 87%), MCI sensitivity was substantially reduced (absolute scoring = 43%; proportional scoring = 56%) when all auditory subtests were omitted, with the biggest contribution to the reduction coming from the delayed recall subtest. Excluding three subtests and maintaining the delayed recall had no effect on MCI sensitivity but reduced specificity (sensitivity = 94%, specificity: 71% using proportional scoring). AD sensitivity, in contrast, was not strongly influenced by our manipulation and remained relatively high through all three subtest omission combinations. The current study highlights the contribution of hearing-dependent subtests on the sensitivity and specificity of the MoCA. Clinical recommendations related to these findings are discussed. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:1689-1694, 2019.

Protocol for the development of versions of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for people with hearing or vision impairment

IntroductionHearing and vision impairments are highly prevalent among older adults and impact commonly used cognitive assessment tools for the identification of dementia. Adaptations of such tests for people with hearing...

The AVERT MoCA Data: Scoring Reliability in a Large Multicenter Trial.

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a widely used cognitive screening tool in stroke. As scoring the visuospatial/executive MoCA items involves subjective judgement, reliability is important. Analyzing data on these items from A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial (AVERT), we compared the original scoring of assessors (n = 102) to blind scoring by a single, independent rater. In a sample of scoresheets from 1,119 participants, we found variable interrater reliability. The match between original assessors and the independent rater was the following: trail-making 97% (κ = 0.94), cube copy 90% (κ = 0.80), clock contour 92% (κ = 0.49), clock numbers 89% (κ = 0.67), and clock hands 72% (κ = 0.46). For all items except clock contour, the independent rater was "stricter" than the original assessors. Discrepancies were typically errors in original scoring, rather than borderline differences in subjective judgement. In trials that include the MoCA, researchers should emphasize scoring rules to assessors and implement independent data checking, especially for clock hands, to maximize accuracy.

Association between Montreal Cognitive Assessment Sub-Item Scores and Corresponding Cognitive Test Performance in Patients with Frontotemporal Dementia and Related Disorders

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), a brief screening test developed to detect patients with mild cognitive impairment, is used in clinical settings across North America [Nasreddine et al.: J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:695-699]. The MoCA has been demonstrated to be sensitive to cognitive deficits in frontotemporal dementias (FTD) and related disorders [Coleman et al.: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2016;30:258-263]. Given attentional impairments in patients with FTD, whether and to what extent the abbreviated items on the MoCA may predict performance on corresponding assessments is not known. Testing and demographic data were extracted from a clinical database using a sample of 91 patients with FTD and related disorders. The relationship between MoCA items and corresponding neuropsychological tasks was assessed through McNemar tests and Spearman correlations. While some MoCA items such as letter fluency, orientation, and clock drawing were strongly correlated with the corresponding standard cognitive test, the MoCA trails were insensitive to impairment compared to the full Trail Making B Test (p = 0.01). In contrast, MoCA naming and delayed recall sub-items detected cognitive impairment more frequently than available comparison tests. The MoCA is a sensitive screening measure to detect impairment in patients with FTD and related disorders, but cognitive deficits specific to FTD result in differential performance on MoCA items compared to longer standard cognitive tests.

Montreal Cognitive Assessment Performance among Community-Dwelling African Americans.

To report descriptive and normative data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in a population-based African American sample. The MoCA was administered to 1,419 African American participants (mean age 49.89 years, range 18-75, 64% female). After excluding those with subjective cognitive complaints (n=301), normative data were generated by education and overlapping age ranges (n=1,118). Pearson correlations and analysis of variance were used to examine the relationship to demographic variables, and frequency of missed items was reviewed. Total MoCA scores (mean 22.3, SD 3.9) were lower than previously published normative data derived from an elderly Caucasian Canadian population with 80% falling below the suggested cutoff (<26) for impairment. Several MoCA items were missed by a large portion of the sample, including cube drawing (72%), delayed free recall (66% <4/5 words), sentence repetition (63%), and abstraction items (45%). This is the first study to examine normative performance on the MoCA specific to community-dwelling African Americans. Findings suggest that certain aspects of this measure and previously established cutoff scores may not be well-suited for some populations.

Defining and validating a short form Montreal Cognitive Assessment (s-MoCA) for use in neurodegenerative disease

IntroductionScreening for cognitive deficits is essential in neurodegenerative disease. Screening tests, such as the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), are easily administered, correlate with neuropsychological performance and demonstrate diagnostic utility. Yet,...

Could everyday technology improve access to assessments? A pilot study on the feasibility of screeningcognition in people with Parkinson's disease using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment via Internet videoconferencing.

The distances and distribution of people, and pressures on the health system in Australia mean that access to services for people living with a neurodegenerative condition may be inadequate. Telehealth may offer ways to provide timely and efficient monitoring and support. People with Parkinson's disease require regular screening of their symptoms and needs, but may have limited access to health professionals. Cognitive changes can impact on occupational performance, thus timely monitoring of cognition is important for informing occupational therapy interventions. To evaluate the feasibility of screening cognition in people with Parkinson's disease using available technology in their homes. Eleven participants with Parkinson's disease completed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment face-to-face and then via videoconferencing one week later using the technology available at their home. Participants and assessors provided feedback on their experience. All Montreal Cognitive Assessment items could be completed over videoconference (e.g. Skype), with a median difference of 2 (IQR: 1-2.5) between face-to-face and videoconference scores. Higher scores were not favoured by either mode of assessment. Three participants received inconsistent cognitive classifications between the two assessment methods. Participant and assessor feedback indicated reported benefits including convenience as well as technological limitations. Given the pressures on the health system and the apparent acceptability to consumers, occupational therapists may explore the utility of readily accessible technology to enable timely monitoring of cognition for people with Parkinson's disease. Further research is needed to develop and demonstrate the reliability and validity of this approach.

The Combined Utility of a Brief Functional Measure and Performance-Based Screening Test for Case Finding of Cognitive Impairment in Primary Healthcare

BackgroundUse of a total risk score (TRS) based on vascular and sociodemographic risk factors has been recommended to identify patients at risk of cognitive impairment. Moreover, combining screening tests has been reported to improve positive predictive values (PPV) for case finding of cognitive impairment. ObjectiveWe investigated the utility of the conjunctive combination of the informant-based AD8 and the performance-based National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network (NINDS-CSN) 5-minute protocol for the detection of cognitive impairment, defined by a clinical dementia rating (CDR) score ≥0.5, in patients at risk of cognitive impairment (TRS ≥3). MethodsParticipants were recruited from 2 primary healthcare centers in Singapore and received the AD8, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Mini-Mental State Examination, CDR, and a formal neuropsychological test battery. The scores for NINDS-CSN 5-minute protocol were extracted from the Montreal Cognitive Assessment items. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve analyses were conducted to determine the discriminant indices of the screening instruments, the conjunctive combination (ie, screened positive on both tests), and the compensatory combination (ie, screened positive in either of or both tests). ResultsA total of 309 participants were recruited of whom 78.7% (n = 243) had CDR = 0 and 21.3% (n = 66) had CDR ≥0.5. The conjunctive combination of AD8 and NINDS-CSN 5-minute protocol achieved excellent PPV and acceptable sensitivity (PPV 91.7%, sensitivity 73.3%). ConclusionsThe conjunctive combination of the AD8 and NINDS-CSN 5-minute protocol is brief and accurate, and hence, suitable for case finding of cognitive impairment (CDR ≥0.5) in patients screened positive on the TRS in primary healthcare centers.

Comparison of Alternate and Original Items on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment.

BackgroundThe Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a screening tool for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in elderly individuals. We hypothesized that measurement error when using the new alternate MoCA versions to monitor change over time could be related to the use of items that are not of comparable difficulty to their corresponding originals of similar content. The objective of this study was to compare the difficulty of the alternate MoCA items to the original ones.MethodsFive selected items from alternate versions of the MoCA were included with items from the original MoCA administered adaptively to geriatric outpatients (N = 78). Rasch analysis was used to estimate the difficulty level of the items.ResultsNone of the five items from the alternate versions matched the difficulty level of their corresponding original items.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the potential benefits of a Rasch analysis-based approach for selecting items during the process of development of parallel forms. The results suggest that better match of the items from different MoCA forms by their difficulty would result in higher sensitivity to changes in cognitive function over time.