Abstract Background: Vitiligo is an idiopathic acquired illness characterized by limited depigmented macules and patches. We aim to compare intravenous (IV) methylprednisolone pulse therapy with oral prednisolone minipulse therapy in the treatment of progressive vitiligo. Objective: The assessment of the efficacy of both treatment methods in the arrest of the progression of vitiligo and repigmentation of the existing lesions. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 patients, 30 in each group, were enrolled for the study. Each patient underwent a detailed clinical, general physical, systemic, and thorough dermatological examination. A set of routine investigations, consisting of hemoglobin%, total leukocyte count, differential leukocyte count, urine routine examination, blood sugar (fasting and postprandial), liver function tests, renal function test, serum electrolytes, Montoux test, chest X-ray posteroanterior view, and thyroid profile were carried out before the analysis. Clinical photographs were taken before the start of therapy and after each month thereafter were used for the analysis after taking written consent. Results: The age of vitiligo patients considered for the study ranged from 13 to 70 years. The ratio of male-to-female patients considered for the study was 22:38 (36.6%: 63.3%). The duration of instability in vitiligo cases studied varied from 6 months to 2 years. In both Group A and Group B, the maximum number of patients (66.7% and 86.7%, respectively) had unstable vitiligo for 6 months to 1 year. Percentage repigmentation was better in Group A (IV) than Group B (OMP). In Group A, 17 out of 20 (85%) patients had shown different degrees of repigmentation, while 20 out of 30 (66.7%) patients of Group B had shown the same. This was statistically insignificant. Types of repigmentation observed in patients were of the following types: perifollicular, marginal, and combined. In both groups, all patients showed perifollicular regimentation. Conclusions: In progressive vitiligo, it was observed that oral mini pulse with prednisolone is superior to IV methylprednisolone pulse therapy for the arrest of progression. Considering the cost, mode of administration, hospital admission, loss of man-hours, and patients’ compliance, OMP was considered simpler and cost-effective.