You have accessJournal of UrologyTrauma/Reconstruction/Diversion: Ureter (including Pyeloplasty) and Bladder Reconstruction (including fistula), Augmentation, Substitution, Diversion II (PD41)1 Apr 2020PD41-07 SELF-PERCEPTION, QUALITY OF LIFE AND EASE OF CATHETERIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH CONTINENT URINARY DIVERSION WITH THE MITROFANOFF PRINCIPLE Julian Chavarriaga*, German Patino, Maria Ocampo, Nicolas Fernandez, Jaime Perez, and John Bolivar Julian Chavarriaga*Julian Chavarriaga* More articles by this author , German PatinoGerman Patino More articles by this author , Maria OcampoMaria Ocampo More articles by this author , Nicolas FernandezNicolas Fernandez More articles by this author , Jaime PerezJaime Perez More articles by this author , and John BolivarJohn Bolivar More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000921.07AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Continent urinary diversion (CUD) with the Mitrofanoff principle stands as an alternative to urethral Catheterization by a route other than the urethra when the urethra could not be used or for a patient who will need clean intermittent Catheterization (CIC) lifelong. The aim of the study was to determine self-perception of health related quality of life (HRQoL), ease of Catheterization and global and cosmetic outcomes in patients reliant on Mitrofanoff catheterization for bladder emptying. METHODS: Cross-sectional study that aims to describe HRQoL with the EuroQol EQ-5D-3L questionnaire, Cosmetic and global satisfaction with a questionnaire designed by the reconstructive urology board and ease of catheterization with a Likert questionnaire adapted from the Intermittent Catheterization Difficulty Questionnaire (ICDQ) validated in patients reliant on retrograde CIC. Records of all patients requiring CUD with the Mitrofanoff principle by three surgeons were reviewed, and data regarding sociodemographic characteristics, complications, diagnosis and follow up were collected from patient medical records. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients requiring CUD with the Mitrofanoff principle between 2012 and 2018, the group was composed mainly of appendiceal conduits 18 patients (72%) and 7 ileal conduits (Yang-Monti) and three of those requiring Casale (Monti Spiral) and 1 a Double Monti technique. Median follow up was 57 months with an Interquartile Range (IQR) of 9-84 months, median age was 30 years with an IQR of 5-76 years. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of the EQ-5D-3L reported a Global health score of 86.5%. 59% of the patients had no pain or bleeding with catheterization. Regarding Global satisfaction and cosmetic perception 91% were satisfied with their CUD, 95% would recommend this procedure to a friend and 64% were satisfied with the cosmetic appearance of their stoma. CONCLUSIONS: CUD with the Mitrofanoff its associated with good HRQoL, global satisfaction, ease and painless Catheterization, adequate self-perception of cosmetic outcomes and a low complication rate, remaining a safe and viable option for patients reliant on CIC and who´s urethra could not be used for micturition or retrograde catheterization. To our Knowledge this is the first study that reports all these outcomes in this setting, with follow up, up to 84 months. Source of Funding: None © 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 203Issue Supplement 4April 2020Page: e823-e823 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2020 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Julian Chavarriaga* More articles by this author German Patino More articles by this author Maria Ocampo More articles by this author Nicolas Fernandez More articles by this author Jaime Perez More articles by this author John Bolivar More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract