Monotherapy Subgroup Research Articles

Impact of second-generation antipsychotics monotherapy or combined therapy in cytokine, lymphocyte subtype, and thyroid antibodies for schizophrenia: a retrospective study

BackgroundSchizophrenia (SCZ) shares high clinical relevance with the immune system, and the potential interactions of psychopharmacological drugs with the immune system are still an overlooked area. Here, we aimed to identify whether the second-generation antipsychotics (SGA) monotherapy or combined therapy of SGA with other psychiatric medications influence the routine blood immunity biomarkers of patients with SCZ.MethodsMedical records of inpatients with SCZ from January 2019 to June 2023 were retrospectively screened from June 2023 to August 2023. The demographic data and peripheral levels of cytokines (IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, TNF-α, INF-γ, and IL-17 A), lymphocyte subtype proportions (CD3+, CD4+, CD8 + T-cell, and natural killer (NK) cells), and thyroid autoimmune antibodies (thyroid peroxidase antibody (TPOAb), and antithyroglobulin antibody (TGAb)) were collected and analyzed.Results30 drug-naïve patients, 64 SGA monotherapy (20 for first-episode SCZ, 44 for recurrent SCZ) for at least one week, 39 combined therapies for recurrent SCZ (18 with antidepressant, 10 with benzodiazepine, and 11 with mood stabilizer) for at least two weeks, and 23 used to receive SGA monotherapy (had withdrawn for at least two weeks) were included despite specific medication. No difference in cytokines was found between the SGA monotherapy sub-groups (p > 0.05). Of note, SGA monotherapy appeared to induce a down-regulation of IFN-γ in both first (mean [95% confidence interval]: 1.08 [0.14–2.01] vs. 4.60 [2.11–7.08], p = 0.020) and recurrent (1.88 [0.71–3.05] vs. 4.60 [2.11–7.08], p = 0.027) episodes compared to drug-naïve patients. However, the lymphocyte proportions and thyroid autoimmune antibodies remained unchanged after at least two weeks of SGA monotherapy (p > 0.05). In combined therapy groups, results mainly resembled the SGA monotherapy for recurrent SCZ (p > 0.05).ConclusionThe study demonstrated that SGA monotherapy possibly achieved its comfort role via modulating IFN-γ, and SGA combined therapy showed an overall resemblance to monotherapy.

Perampanel as monotherapy or first adjunctive therapy in pediatric and adult patients with epilepsy: the first United States-based phase IV open-label ELEVATE study

ELEVATE (Study 410; NCT03288129) is the first prospective, multicenter, open-label, Phase IV study of perampanel as monotherapy or first adjunctive therapy in patients aged ≥ 4 years with focal-onset seizures or generalized tonic–clonic seizures in the United States. The study included Screening, Titration (≤ 13 weeks), Maintenance (39 weeks), and Follow-up (4 weeks) Periods. During Titration, perampanel was initiated at 2 mg/day and up-titrated to 4 mg/day at Week 3. Depending on response and tolerability, optional up-titrations to a maximum of 12 mg/day occurred. The primary endpoint was retention rate; additional endpoints included seizure-freedom rate, 50% responder rate, and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). At baseline, 10 (18.5%) patients were assigned to the monotherapy group and 44 (81.5%) patients to the first adjunctive therapy group. However, due to the addition of an anti-seizure medication along with perampanel on the first day of treatment, one patient was excluded from the monotherapy subgroup analyses. The mean perampanel exposure duration was 39.8 weeks and 32 (59.3%) patients completed the study. Retention rate at 12 months (or study completion) was 63.0% (monotherapy, 77.8%; first adjunctive therapy, 59.1%). Seizure-freedom rate during the Maintenance Period was 32.7% (monotherapy, 44.4%; first adjunctive therapy, 29.5%) and the 50% responder rate was 78.7% (monotherapy, 85.7%; first adjunctive therapy, 76.9%). TEAEs and serious TEAEs were reported by 88.9% (n = 48/54) and 7.4% (n = 4/54) of patients, respectively. Overall, the efficacy and safety of perampanel as monotherapy or first adjunctive therapy support the use of perampanel as early-line treatment for epilepsy.

Immunotherapy versus tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in first-line setting: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

e16132 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma has a high mortality rate, with an overall 5-year survival of less than 20%. Whether the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is superior to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) as a first-line therapy remains unclear. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to compare ICI, in monotherapy or combined with TKI or anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody in naïve treatment. We searched Embase, PubMed and Cochrane Library databases from inception to November 2022. The outcomes evaluated were Overall Survival (OS), Progression Free-Survival (PFS), Overall Response Rate (ORR) and Treatment Related Adverse Events (TRAE). Using a random-effects model, statistical analysis was performed with RevMan 5.4 version for proportions and risk ratios for binary outcomes from comparative studies. Results: We included 10 RCTs comprising 6097 patients in the final analysis, 2554 in ICI monotherapy, 1096 in ICI with anti-VEGF and 2447 in ICI with TKI. The use of ICI, alone or in combination therapy, was associated with a better OS (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.69–0.85; p< 0.00001; I²=46%) and PFS (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.64-0.92, p=0.005; I²= 85%). In the ICI monotherapy subgroup, there was a statistical difference to TKI in OS (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.75-0.91; p=0.0001; I² = 0%). Although there was a higher ORR in all ICI groups (RR 2.56; 95% CI 1.89-3.46; p<0.00001, I²=68%), TRAE Grades 3-4 (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.61-1.18; p=0.33; I²=96%) presented no difference when compared with TKI. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the use of ICI, alone or in combination with TKI or anti-VEGF, is a superior option for first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, improving OS, PFS, and ORR without increasing treatment toxicity. These results are important for guiding clinical decision-making and further research in this field.

Safety and Effectiveness of Rasagiline in Chinese Patients with Parkinson's Disease: A Prospective, Multicenter, Non-interventional Post-marketing Study.

Rasagiline is indicated for treating idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) as monotherapy and adjunct therapy to levodopa in patients. To assess the post-marketing safety and tolerability of rasagiline in Chinese PD patients, as well as its effectiveness in improving motor symptoms. This prospective, non-interventional, multicenter, cohort study included PD patients administered rasagiline monotherapy or adjunct therapy to levodopa. The primary outcome was the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) according to MedDRA® (version 22.0), and the secondary outcomes were the Parkinson's Disease Unified Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III, Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), and Clinical Global Impression-Global-Improvement (CGI-I), assessed at Weeks 4, 12, and 24. In total, 734 patients, 95 in the monotherapy subgroup and 639 in the adjunct therapy subgroup, were included in the safety population. The incidence rates of all ADRs were comparable between the monotherapy (15.8%) and adjunct therapy (13.6%) subgroups. The most common ADRs by system organ class were nervous system disorders (5.6%), gastrointestinal disorders (3.3%), psychiatric disorders (1.8%), vascular disorders (1.2%), and general disorders and administration site conditions (1.1%). Five (0.7%) participants experienced 5 serious ADRs. Improvements in UPDRS part III, CGI-S and CGI-I at Weeks 4, 12 and 24 from baseline were observed. Safety data in this study indicated no extra safety concerns. Rasagiline is generally safe and well tolerated in Chinese PD patients. The safety profile and tolerability were in line with the established safety profile. Moreover, rasagiline reduced the severity of PD motor symptoms, confirming findings by previous clinical trials.

The predictive value of PD-L1 expression in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Programmed death 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors have transformed the treatment landscape of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but consistent responses are not observed in all patients, and prognostic biomarkers to guide treatment decisions are lacking. We aimed to evaluate the predictive value of PD-L1 expression in advanced HCC patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was conducted. Studies comparing the objective response rate (ORR) and/or disease control rate (DCR) based on the tumor PD-L1 status of HCC were included. Eleven studies with 1,330 HCC patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were included. Pooled odds ratio (OR) analysis demonstrated a significantly improved ORR in PD-L1-positive patients compared with PD-L1-negative patients (OR, 1.86, 95% CI, 1.35-2.55). Similar results were observed in the anti-PD-1 treatment (p < 0.001) and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy (p < 0.001) subgroups. The pooled ORRs in the PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative groups were 26% (95% CI, 20%-32%) and 18% (95% CI, 13%-22%), respectively. For DCR, the pooled OR analysis showed no significant difference between PD-L1-positive patients and PD-L1-negative patients (66% [95% CI, 55%-76%] vs. 69% [95% CI, 62%-76%]; OR, 0.92, 95% CI, 0.59-1.44). The results were consistent across the drug target and combination treatment subgroups. Positive PD-L1 expression is associated with a better ORR in advanced HCC patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based therapies. This feature can help to identify HCC patients who will benefit most from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

PCSK9 Inhibitor Use and Outcomes Using Concomitant Lipid-Lowering Therapies in the Veterans Health Administration

BackgroundReal-world data on use of PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9-Is), with or without statins and/or ezetimibe, and associated outcomes, can inform more effective prescribing. The objective was to evaluate clinical effectiveness and safety of PCSK9-Is within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we included Veterans who had at least one outpatient prescription for alirocumab and/or evolocumab filled within VHA between August 21, 2015, and September 30, 2020. Analyses included 4 mutually exclusive subgroups: PCSK9-I alone, PCSK9-I+statin, PCSK9-I+ezetimibe, and PCSK9-I+statin+ezetimibe subgroups. Primary outcomes included medication possession ratio, persistence, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL). ResultsAmong Veterans in the analytical cohort (n = 2428), 36.2% were on PCSK9-I monotherapy; 24.0% received a PCSK9-I+statin; 27.4% were on a PCSK9-I+ezetimibe; and 12.4% received triple therapy, that is, PCSK9-I+statin+ezetimibe. The mean medication possession ratio (standard deviation [SD]) for PCSK9-I monotherapy was 83.8% (13.3) compared to 84.3% (11.2) with PCSK9-I+statin therapy, 87.1% (10.1) with PCSK9-I+ezetimibe therapy, and 85.8% (11.7) with triple therapy. The percentage of patients who discontinued PCSK9-I in the monotherapy subgroup was 12.3% vs 9.5%, 6.6%, and 7.4% in the concomitant statin, ezetimibe, and triple-therapy subgroups, respectively (p = .002 among the groups). Mean LDL level was greater in the PCSK9-I monotherapy subgroup (85.6 mg/dL) compared with the concomitant statin (66.5 mg/dL), ezetimibe (65.7 mg/dL), and triple-therapy subgroups (68.1 mg/dL). ConclusionsVeterans showed good adherence and/or persistence with PCSK9-I regimens. On average, those receiving concomitant therapy with a statin and/or ezetimibe achieved significantly lower LDL levels.

Bayesian Meta-analysis of Direct Oral Anticoagulation Versus Vitamin K Antagonists With or Without Concomitant Antiplatelet After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Anticoagulation Indication.

Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) commonly have co-morbidities requiring anticoagulation. However, the optimal post-procedural anticoagulation regimen is not well-established. This meta-analysis investigates safety and efficacy outcomes of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and Vitamin K Antagonist (VKA), with or without concomitant antiplatelet therapy. We searched EMBASE and MEDLINE for appropriate studies. Subgroup analyses were performed for anticoagulant monotherapy and combined therapy with antiplatelet agents. Eleven studies (6359 patients) were included. Overall, there were no differences between DOACs and VKA for all-cause mortality (Odds Ratio [OR]: .69; Credible Interval [CrI]: .40-1.06), cardiovascular-related mortality (OR: .76; Crl: .13-3.47), bleeding (OR: .95; CrI: .75-1.17), stroke (OR: 1.04; CrI: .65-1.63), myocardial infarction (OR: 1.51; CrI: .55-3.84), and valve thrombosis (OR: .29; CrI: .01-3.54). For DOACs vs VKA monotherapy subgroup, there were no differences in outcomes. For the combined therapy subgroup, there was decreased odds of all-cause mortality in the DOACs group compared with the VKA group (OR: .13; CrI: .02-.65), but no differences for bleeding and stroke. DOACs and VKA have similar safety and efficacy profiles for post-TAVI patients with anticoagulation indication. However, if concomitant antiplatelet therapy is required, DOACs were more favorable than VKA for all-cause mortality.

Efficacy and dose-response relationship of oral treprostinil in PAH patients on monotherapy or dual background therapy

Abstract Background FREEDOM-C and FREEDOM-C2 were randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded international, multicenter studies investigating the use of oral treprostinil (TRE) in subjects on mono or dual background pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) therapies. Both had a primary endpoint of change in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) at Week 16 vs baseline. Previous post-hoc analyses combining mono and dual therapy subjects (PDE-5i and/or ERA) from these studies revealed a TRE dose-dependent increase in 6MWD. (1. White &amp; Rao, 2016) Purpose This post-hoc analysis was performed to determine if subjects from FREEDOM-C and FREEDOM-C2 derive improvements in 6MWD with increasing doses of TRE when stratified by mono or dual background therapy and to determine if PAH background therapies (mono or dual) impacted 6MWD. Methods All active subjects (n=331) from FREEDOM-C and FREEDOM-C2 were grouped into TRE dose tertiles (low-dose: ≤2 mg BID, mid-dose: &amp;gt;2 mg to ≤3.5 mg BID, and high-dose: &amp;gt;3.5 mg BID). Placebo subjects (n=329) were in a separate 0 mg dose group. No data imputation was implemented. Comparisons of 6MWD change at Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 between mono and dual therapy subgroups at any dose group were performed using a two-sample t-test or nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test was conducted with subsequent pairwise comparisons of 6MWD change at Week 16 between the four dose groups through Dunn's approach. Additionally, the Jonckheere-Terpstra test was used to assess the linear trend for 6MWD improvement with higher doses of TRE. Results Baseline characteristics of the combined intention to treat (ITT) population and summary of 6MWD for subjects with both baseline and Week 16 data are in Table 1. 6MWD change improved steadily to Week 16 in subjects at higher TRE doses, regardless of the number of PAH background therapies (Figure 1). No statistical differences were found between mono and dual therapy at any time point or for any dose group. At Week 16, there was a significant difference in 6MWD change between the placebo group and high dose group within both mono and dual background therapy subjects. The difference between the low- and high-dose groups was significant for subjects on dual background therapy. There was a significant positive linear trend for TRE doses in 6MWD improvement at Week 16 for both monotherapy subjects (one-sided p-value = 0.0002) and dual therapy subjects (one-sided p-value = 0.0242). Conclusions 6MWD improved in PAH patients regardless of their background therapy (monotherapy or dual background) and derive greater 6MWD improvements with higher doses of TRE. The observed dose-dependent 6MWD increase supports the use of TRE in sequential combination with background therapies (mono or dual). Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): United Therapeutics Corporation

Replacement of Valproic Acid with New Anti-Seizure Medications in Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy.

Highlights What are the main findings? Replacement of VPA with new ASMs provided the same or better seizure control.Replacement of VPA with new ASMs provided better myoclonus control.Subsets of the monotherapy group achieved better seizure control with new ASMs. What is the implication of the main finding? This study showed the non-inferiority of new ASMs compared to VPA in terms of seizure control.Better seizure control was achieved using new ASMs in the PER monotherapy sub-group among patients with IGE.Background: Little is known regarding the non-inferiority of new anti-seizure medications (ASMs) in terms of replacing valproic acid (VPA) in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE). We hypothesized that replacement of VPA with new ASMs would offer non-inferior or better control of seizure frequency. The purpose of this study was to compare epileptic seizure frequency between the subset of patients with IGE who were on VPA and the subset of patients with IGE who replaced VPA with new ASMs. Methods: Patients with IGE who were on or had been on VPA between January 2016 and March 2022 were divided into a group that replaced VPA with new ASMs (VPA-replace group) and a group that remained on VPA (VPA-continue group). We then compared the groups in terms of seizure frequency and myoclonus. Results: Of the 606 patients on VPA between January 2016 and March 2022, 156 patients with IGE were enrolled to this study (VPA-replace group, n = 68; VPA-continue group, n = 88). The VPA-replace group included significantly more females than the VPA-continue group (p < 0.001). The VPA-replace group also showed significantly higher seizure frequency before replacement (p < 0.001), but not after replacement (p = 0.074). Patients on monotherapy displayed improved seizure frequency with new ASMs (p < 0.001). Among the new ASMs, perampanel (PER) significantly improved seizure frequency (p = 0.002). Forty-two patients in the VPA-replace group who had myoclonus achieved significant improvements (p < 0.001). Among these, patients on PER monotherapy (p < 0.001) or PER + lamotrigine (0.016) showed significantly improved myoclonus scale scores. Conclusions: This study shows the non-inferiority of new ASMs compared to VPA, with better seizure control using new ASMs in subsets of patients with IGE on monotherapy.

Switching to Preservative-Free Tafluprost/Timolol Fixed-Dose Combination in the Treatment of Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: Subanalysis of Data from the VISIONARY Study According to Baseline Monotherapy Treatment.

IntroductionThe VISIONARY study demonstrated statistically significant intraocular pressure (IOP) reductions with the preservative-free fixed-dose combination of tafluprost 0.0015% and timolol 0.5% (PF tafluprost/timolol FC) in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) patients, sub-optimally controlled with topical prostaglandin analogue (PGA) or beta-blocker monotherapy. Current subanalyses have examined these data according to the baseline monotherapy.MethodsA European, prospective, observational study included adults (aged ≥ 18 years) with OAG or OHT, who were switched to the PF tafluprost/timolol FC from PGA or beta-blocker monotherapy. Treatment outcomes were reported according to prior monotherapy subgroup: beta-blocker, preserved latanoprost, PF-latanoprost, bimatoprost, tafluprost, and travoprost. Endpoints included the mean change from baseline regarding IOP, conjunctival hyperemia, and corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) at Week 4 and Week 12, and at Month 6.ResultsThe subanalysis included 577 patients. All prior monotherapy subgroups demonstrated statistically significant IOP reductions from baseline at Week 4, that were maintained through Month 6 (p < 0.001). Mean (SD) IOP change at Month 6 was 6.6 (4.16), 6.3 (4.39), 5.6 (3.67), 4.9 (2.97), 4.6 (4.39), and 4.7 (3.64) mmHg for prior beta-blocker, preserved latanoprost, PF-latanoprost, tafluprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost subgroups, respectively. The largest IOP change was observed in the preserved latanoprost subgroup for each of the ≥ 20%, ≥ 25%, ≥ 30%, and ≥ 35% IOP reduction categories at Month 6, demonstrating respective reductions of 8.06, 9.20, 10.64, and 11.55 mmHg. CFS was significantly reduced at Month 6 in the prior bimatoprost subgroup (p = 0.0013). Conjunctival hyperemia severity was significantly reduced at each study visit for prior preserved latanoprost users (p < 0.001).ConclusionPF tafluprost/timolol FC therapy provided statistically and clinically significant IOP reductions from Week 4 over the total 6-month period, in patients with OAG/OHT, regardless of the type of prior PGA or beta-blocker monotherapy used. Conjunctival hyperemia severity and CFS decreased significantly in prior bimatoprost and preserved latanoprost users, respectively.Clinical Study NumberEuropean Union electronic Register of Post-Authorization Studies (EU PAS) register number: EUPAS22204.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-022-02166-6.

Adjunctive PD-1 inhibitor versus standard chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To investigate whether Adjunctive PD-1 inhibitors have improved clinical outcomes compared to chemotherapy alone in platinum-pretreated and platinum-naive recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPCA). The study involved a literature search from PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on the use of PD-1 inhibitors versus chemotherapy alone in patients with R/M NPCA. Bias was assessed using Cochrane collaboration's risk of bias tool. Overall Survival (OS) was examined as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Objective Response Rate, Disease Control Rate (DCR), Duration of Response, and Serious/Grade ⩾3 Adverse Events. Outcomes were measured with either Mean Difference, Risk ratio (RR), or Hazard ratios (HRs) at 95% confidence interval. Four RCTs were included in the meta-analysis and systematic review. OS for the monotherapy subgroup was a HR of 0.87 [0.67, 1.13] (p = 0.30) while the combination subgroup had 0.64 [0.45, 0.90] (p = 0.01). The monotherapy subgroup exhibited significantly worse outcomes in PFS (HR 1.31 [1.01, 1.68]) (p = 0.04) and DCR (RR 1.52 [1.12, 2.05]) (p = 0.007) but no significant difference in other outcomes. For combination therapy, a statistically significant benefit can be seen in all outcomes except DCR (RR 0.62 [0.38, 1.01]) (p = 0.06) which was a non-significant benefit favoring PD-1 inhibitors. Combination PD-1 inhibitor + chemotherapy followed by maintenance PD-1 inhibitor therapy is superior to chemotherapy alone in the first-line treatment of R/M NPCA, implying a potential benefit with the use of PD-1 inhibitors + chemotherapy with maintenance PD-1 inhibitors as first-line in R/M NPCA compared to standard chemotherapy alone.

Veliparib monotherapy following carboplatin/paclitaxel plus veliparib combination therapy in patients with germline BRCA-associated advanced breast cancer: results of exploratory analyses from the phase III BROCADE3 trial

In the BROCADE3 trial, addition of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, veliparib, to carboplatin/paclitaxel improved progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.57-0.88; P= 0.002) in patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, germline BRCA1/2-mutated breast cancer. A subset of patients discontinued both carboplatin and paclitaxel before progression and continued on veliparib/placebo maintenance monotherapy until progression. Analyses in this patient subgroup are reported. Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to veliparib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel or placebo plus carboplatin/paclitaxel. Veliparib (120 mg twice daily) or placebo was given on days-2 to 5, carboplatin (area under the curve 6 mg/ml) on day 1, and paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of 21-day cycles. Patients who discontinued both carboplatin and paclitaxel before progression received blinded study drug monotherapy at an increased dose of 300-400 mg twice daily continuously. PFS was the primary endpoint. Exploratory analyses were carried out in the subgroup of patients who received blinded study drug as monotherapy. A time-varying Cox model including data from all patients was also used to evaluate treatment effect in the combination and monotherapy phases. A total of 136 of 337 patients randomized to veliparib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel and 58/172 patients randomized to placebo plus carboplatin/paclitaxel discontinued both carboplatin and paclitaxel before progression and continued on blinded veliparib or placebo monotherapy. In this blinded monotherapy subgroup, investigator-assessed median PFS from randomization was 25.7 months with veliparib versus 14.6 months with placebo. Hazard ratios from a time-varying Cox model favored veliparib during both combination therapy and monotherapy. Any-grade adverse events occurring in the monotherapy phase were primarily gastrointestinal. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia and anemia (4% each with veliparib; 5% and 2%, respectively, with placebo). Veliparib maintenance monotherapy had a tolerable safety profile and may extend PFS following combination chemotherapy.

Changes in Corneal Epithelial Thickness Induced by Topical Antiglaucoma Medications

Corneal thickness measurement is important for assessing intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma. This study investigated the changes in corneal epithelial thickness (CET) induced by antiglaucoma medications and explored the factors affecting CET measurement. CET was measured over a 9.0 mm diameter area by using Fourier domain optical coherence tomography in 125 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and 125 age-matched controls without glaucoma. The influence of sex, age, benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-containing instillations, disease severity, and types and numbers of medications was analyzed using simple and multiple regression analyses. CET over 25 sectors was smaller in the glaucoma group than in the control group (mean difference of 4.2 µm in the central 2.0 mm zone; 52.8 ± 3.6 vs. 48.5 ± 3.9, p < 0.001). Simple regression analysis revealed age, use of β-blockers, prostaglandin, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, total number of medications, and number of daily BAK-containing instillations were associated with a thinner epithelium. Multiple regression analysis revealed β-blockers, prostaglandin, and number of BAK-containing instillations were significant factors. Use of β-blockers and number of BAK-containing instillations were also associated with a thinner epithelium in the monotherapy subgroup analysis. CET was significantly smaller in patients with glaucoma receiving topical medications and was affected by the use of β-blockers, prostaglandin, and BAK.

Anti-PD1 versus anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy in first-line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BackgroundDue to the increasing number of trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the first‐line therapy of non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, we performed a systematic review and meta‐analyses to investigate the difference between anti PD‐1 and PD‐L1 antibodies, used alone or in combination with chemotherapy, through adjusted indirect analysis to minimize the potential bias regarding overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and grade 3–5 adverse events (AEs).MethodsA systematic review of studies reporting clinical outcomes and toxicity associated with first‐line therapy employing anti‐PD1 or anti‐PD‐L1 antibodies alone, or in combination with chemotherapy, to treat metastatic, treatment‐naïve NSCLC patients was performed. Primary outcomes were OS, PFS, ORR and grade 3–5 AEs. We used a random‐effects model to generate pooled estimates for proportions. Meta‐analyses using pooled risk ratios were performed for binary outcomes from comparative studies with the random effects model.ResultsA total of 13 eligible studies met our eligibility criteria, including 7673 patients. In the ICI‐chemotherapy combination subgroup, we observed that anti‐PD1 therapy was associated with better OS (p = 0.022) and PFS (p = 0.029) compared with anti‐PD‐L1 therapy. In the monotherapy subgroup, there was no statistical difference between the use of anti‐PD‐1 and anti‐PD‐L1 for OS and PFS. With regard to ORR and toxicity, in the ICI‐chemotherapy combination subgroup, we observed a trend of better ORR (p = 0.12) with the use of anti‐PD1 therapy and less frequent grade 3–5 AEs compared to the use of anti‐PD‐L1 therapy (p = 0.0302). In the monotherapy subgroup, there was no statistical difference between the use of anti‐PD‐1 and anti‐PD‐L1 regarding ORR and toxicity.ConclusionsOur study suggests that PD‐1 drug plus chemotherapy is superior to anti‐PD‐L1 plus chemotherapy for NSCLC; nevertheless, as monotherapy, both strategies appear to be similar.

Detrusor Overactivity May Be a Prognostic Factor for Better Response to Combination Therapy Over Monotherapy in Male Patients With Benign Prostatic Enlargement and Storage Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.

PurposeSeveral trials have shown that in men with overactive bladder (OAB) and benign prostate enlargement (BPE), the combination of an α-blocker with an anticholinergic is superior to α-blocker monotherapy. The purpose of this study is to explore whether urodynamic detrusor overactivity (DO) affects clinical outcomes in men with BPE and OAB.MethodsThis is a post hoc analysis of a prospective, randomized trial, designed to evaluate the changes of morphometric parameters of the prostate following monotherapy or combination therapy in men with BPE-OAB. The initial study recruited men aged ≥50 years, with BPE and predominantly storage lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Patients were randomized to receive tamsulosin monotherapy or a combination of tamsulosin and solifenacin for 26 weeks. All participants completed a 3-day bladder diary and the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), and then underwent pressure-flow and ultrasonographic studies. Data were stratified and analysed based on the urodynamic observation of DO at baseline (DO vs. non-DO). The primary endpoint was the mean change in urgency episodes from baseline. Secondary outcomes were the changes in nocturia, total IPSS, and urodynamic parameters.ResultsSixty-nine men were initially randomized, but only 60 men were included in this analysis. Urgency episodes significantly improved in men with DO who received combination therapy compared to the DO monotherapy subgroup (P=0.04) or to the non-DO combination treatment subgroup (P=0.038). Nocturia also improved in the DO combination treatment subgroup as compared to the non-DO combination subgroup (P=0.037). The 24-hour frequency and total IPSS significantly improved from baseline without significant differences among the subgroups.ConclusionsThe present study suggests that baseline DO could be a prognostic factor for a better response to combination therapy over monotherapy in men with BPE and storage LUTS.

Effect of bicyclol on blood biomarkers of NAFLD: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectiveNon-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a global epidemic without effective therapeutic agents in the clinic. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of the marketed hepatoprotectant bicyclol at improving...

Long-term safety and efficacy of brivaracetam in adults with focal seizures: Results from an open-label, multinational, follow-up trial

BackgroundThis long-term follow-up (LTFU) trial was conducted to evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of brivaracetam (BRV) at individualized doses (maximum of 200 mg/day) in patients with focal seizures. The secondary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of BRV over time. MethodsTwo Phase III, randomized, double-blind, historical-controlled conversion-to-monotherapy trials (N01276: NCT00698581; N01306: NCT00699283) were conducted in patients aged ≥16 years with uncontrolled focal seizures. Patients who completed either of these core trials or who met a protocol-defined exit criterion could enter this LTFU trial (N01315; NCT00761774). Patients entered LTFU at a recommended BRV dose of 100 mg/day, with flexible dosing of 50–200 mg/day, as monotherapy or adjunctive therapy; additional AEDs could be prescribed and adapted in dose if clinically indicated. Safety variables included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Efficacy variables included duration of continuous monotherapy, reduction in focal seizure frequency and seizure freedom. Safety and efficacy variables were assessed for all patients in the safety set or efficacy set, respectively, regardless of BRV treatment regimen. In addition, a post hoc subgroup analysis was conducted for patients who completed the BRV monotherapy period in either core trial, and entered the LTFU on BRV monotherapy. For this subgroup, TEAEs were summarized by 3-month time intervals over the first 12 months of LTFU. Results108 patients were enrolled in the LTFU trial between November 2008 and February 2010. 79 (73.1 %) patients discontinued the LTFU trial, most commonly due to lack of efficacy [37 (34.3 %)] and adverse events [16 (14.8 %)]. At core trial baseline, patients had a median of 6.3 focal seizures/28 days and 53 (49.1 %) had failed ≥5 previous lifetime AEDs. During LTFU, 70 (64.8 %) patients had ≥12 months and 56 (51.9 %) patients had ≥24 months of BRV treatment. TEAEs were reported by 98 (90.7 %) patients; most commonly (≥15 % of patients) convulsion (17.6 %), nasopharyngitis (17.6 %), depression (16.7 %) and fatigue (15.7 %). Median percent reduction from baseline in focal seizure frequency/28 days was 56.8 %. Among 86 patients who completed at least 6 months of treatment, 29 (33.7 %) patients were seizure-free for ≥6 months and 22 (25.6 %) were seizure-free for ≥12 months.50/108 patients were included in the BRV monotherapy subgroup; 33/50 (66.0 %) patients reported a TEAE in the core trials, while 26/50 (52.0 %), 15/37 (40.5 %), 14/33 (42.4 %) and 9/27 (33.3 %) patients reported any TEAE during LTFU months 1–3, 4–6, 7–9 and 10–12, respectively. In the BRV monotherapy subgroup, the most common TEAEs (≥5% of patients) during LTFU months 1–3 were fatigue [3/50 (6.0 %)] and dizziness [3/50 (6.0 %)]. InterpretationResults from the LTFU trial support the long-term safety of BRV at individualized doses of up to 200 mg/day as a well-tolerated, and effective treatment for patients with focal seizures. Efficacy analyses indicate that seizure reductions with brivaracetam were generally maintained over time.

Comparison of the neurocognitive outcomes in term infants treated with levetiracetam and phenobarbital monotherapy for neonatal clinical seizures

PurposeThis study aims to compare the neurocognitive outcome in term infants who were treated using phenobarbital (PB) and levetiracetam (LEV) monotherapy for neonatal clinical seizures. MethodsTerm infants who were treated using PB or LEV monotherapy as the first-line anti-epileptic treatment for neonatal clinical seizures and followed-up in a pediatric neurology outpatient clinic were enrolled in this study. Neurodevelopmental outcome assessments were carried out using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development, third edition (BSID-III), including cognitive, receptive language, expressive language, fine motor and gross motor subscales. ResultsThe study group consisted of 62 infants who received monotherapy with PB monotherapy (n = 22) and LEV (n = 40). The mean duration of monotherapy treatment was 8 ± 6 months. There was no statistically significant difference between PB and LEV monotherapy groups concerning each outcome parameter on the BSID-III. There was also no statistically significant difference between PB and LEV monotherapy subgroups excluding the infants with neurodevelopmental impairment with a BSID-III scale score<7 or a composite score<85. ConclusionOur findings suggest that both LEV and PB therapy can be equally safe as monotherapy for neonatal clinical seizures for the neurodevelopmental outcome assessment with BSID-III.

OP0228 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF IXEKIZUMAB VERSUS ADALIMUMAB (SPIRIT-H2H) WITH AND WITHOUT CONCOMITANT CONVENTIONAL SYNTHETIC DISEASE-MODIFYING ANTIRHEUMATIC DRUGS (DMARD) IN BIOLOGIC DMARD-NAÏVE PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS: 52-WEEK RESULTS

Background:Ixekizumab (IXE), a high-affinity monoclonal antibody selectively targeting IL-17A, was superior to adalimumab (ADA) at Week (Wk) 24 for simultaneous achievement of ACR50 and 100% improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 100) (primary endpoint) in patients (pts) with active PsA from SPIRIT-H2H1. SPIRIT-H2H had two major secondary endpoints and achieved both: noninferiority of IXE to ADA for ACR50 at Wk 24, and superiority of IXE to ADA for PASI 100 at Wk 24.Objectives:To determine how concomitant conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) use affects safety and efficacy of IXE and ADA in prespecified subgroups defined by biologic monotherapy, concomitant MTX use, and concomitant csDMARD use through Wk 52 in SPIRIT-H2H.Methods:SPIRIT-H2H (NCT03151551) was a 52-week, multicentre, randomised, open-label, assessor-blinded, parallel-group study evaluating the efficacy and safety of IXE versus ADA in adults with PsA and naïve to biologic DMARDs. Patients were required to have active PsA fulfilling Classification for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria and ≥3/68 tender and ≥3/66 swollen joints, ≥3% plaque psoriasis BSA involvement, no prior treatment with bDMARDs, and with prior inadequate response to ≥1 csDMARD (but not necessarily current treatment with csDMARDs). Randomization (1:1) was stratified by concomitant use of csDMARD and the presence/absence of moderate to severe PsO (baseline: BSA≥10% + PASI≥12, + static Physician’s Global Assessment≥3). Patients (N=566) received IXE/ADA through 52 wks according to the labelled dose dependent on presence/absence of moderate-to-severe PsO. In this prespecified subgroup analysis by presence or absence of csDMARDs, efficacy outcomes through wk 52 were compared between IXE and ADA using logistic regression models and Fisher’s exact tests. Missing data were imputed using non-responder imputation.Results:At baseline, 167 of 283 IXE-treated patients and 169 of 283 ADA-treated patients had concomitant MTX use. Of these, 9.0% (15/167) and 7.1% (12/169) treated with IXE and ADA, respectively, were taking an additional csDMARD (sulfasalazine, cyclosporine, or leflunomide). A significantly greater proportion of patients on IXE versus ADA achieved the primary endpoint or PASI 100 when used as monotherapy or in combination with csDMARD (Figure 1A and 1C). At Wk 52, the proportion of patients achieving ACR50 was not statistically different between IXE and ADA, regardless of monotherapy or concomitant csDMARD use (Figure 1B). A significantly higher proportion of patients achieved MDA on IXE compared to ADA in the monotherapy subgroup (49% vs 33%), while the response rates were similar in both combination subgroups (Figure 1D). These data support consistent ACR50, PASI 100, and MDA response for IXE across all three subgroups. Frequencies of adverse events were similar across the three subgroups for IXE and ADA (Figure 2).Conclusion:As with prior studies,2,3consistent efficacy across multiple PsA disease-specific endpoints was observed with IXE in SPIRIT-H2H, regardless of whether IXE was taken as monotherapy or in combination with MTX or another csDMARD. No unexpected safety signals were found for either agent.

Appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy and mortality: Conflicting data explained by residual confounding.

ObjectiveClinical practice universally assumes that appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy improves survival in patients with bloodstream infection. However, this is not generally supported by previous studies. We examined the association between appropriate therapy and 30-day mortality, while minimizing bias due to confounding by indication.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study between 2012 and 2017 at a tertiary university hospital in the Netherlands. Adult patients with bloodstream infection attending the emergency department were included. Based on in vitro susceptibility, antibiotic therapy was scored as appropriate or inappropriate. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. To control for confounding, we performed conventional multivariable logistic regression and propensity score methods. Additionally, we performed an analysis in a more homogeneous subgroup (i.e. antibiotic monotherapy).ResultsWe included 1.039 patients, 729 (70.2%) received appropriate therapy. Overall 30-day mortality was 10.4%. Appropriately treated patients had more unfavorable characteristics, indicating more severe illness. Despite adjustments, we found no association between appropriate therapy and mortality. For the antibiotic monotherapy subgroup (n = 449), patient characteristics were more homogeneous. Within this subgroup, appropriate therapy was associated with lower mortality (Odds Ratios [95% Confidence Intervals] ranging from: 0.31 [0.14; 0.67] to 0.40 [0.19; 0.85]).ConclusionsComparing heterogeneous treatment groups distorts associations despite use of common methods to prevent bias. Consequently, conclusions of such observational studies should be interpreted with care. If possible, future investigators should use our method of attempting to identify and analyze the most homogeneous treatment groups nested within their study objective, because this minimizes residual confounding.