Monotherapy In Chinese Patients Research Articles

Potent covalent irreversible inhibitor of KRAS G12C IBI351 in patients with advanced solid tumors: First-in-human phase I study

BackgroundIBI351 is an irreversible and covalent inhibitor of KRAS G12C. Despite FDA approval of two KRAS G12C inhibitors, there are still significant unmet clinical needs in Chinese patients and ongoing concerns about the optimal dosage. Herein, we presented the phase Ia/Ib study of IBI351 monotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors harboring KRAS G12C mutation. MethodsIn phase Ia dose escalation, IBI351 at 250/450/700/900 mg once daily and 450/600/750 mg twice daily (BID) were evaluated. Potentially efficacious doses and optimal recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) were further evaluated in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in phase Ia dose expansion and phase Ib. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and investigator-assessed tumor response were evaluated. ResultsAs of June 13, 2023, 176 patients were enrolled. IBI351 was well tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicity reported across all evaluated doses. The RP2D was determined as 600 mg BID by considering safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics. A total of 168 patients (95.5 %) had at least one treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), and 64 patients (36.4 %) had grade 3 or higher TRAEs, most commonly gamma-glutamyl transferase increased (10.2 %) and anemia (6.8 %). For patients with NSCLC, the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was 45.5 % across all doses. At 600 mg BID, the confirmed ORR was 46.8 % and median progression-free survival was 9.6 months with a median follow-up of 6.9 months. ConclusionsIBI351 was well tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumors and showed promising antitumor activity in advanced NSCLC patients with KRAS G12C mutation.

AGTR1 A1166C gene polymorphism is associated with the effectiveness of valsartan monotherapy in Chinese patients with essential hypertension: A retrospective analysis

Objective: To investigate whether angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AGTR1 A1166C) gene polymorphism was associated with the effectiveness of valsartan monotherapy in Chinese patients with essential hypertension. Methods: This retrospective analysis included 198 patients (⩾18 years of age) who received valsartan monotherapy (80 mg/day) for newly developed essential hypertension at the authors’ center between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2023. Genotyping for AGTR1 A1166C gene polymorphism was done by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-melting curve analysis of genomic DNA from peripheral blood samples. A dominant genetic model for AGTR1 A1166C (AA genotype versus AC + CC genotype) was used. Multivariate regression analysis of baseline variables and AGTR1 polymorphism was conducted to identify predictors of target blood pressure attainment (<140/90 mmHg) at the 4-week follow-up. Results: The median age of the 198 patients was (53.7±13.5) years, and 58% were men. Genotyping assays showed that 164 patients had the AA genotype, and 34 patients were of the AC/CC genotype, including 30 with the AC genotype and 4 with the CC genotype. Allele distribution was consistent with Hardy Weinberg equilibrium. 109 Patients (55.1%) attained the blood pressure target. Multivariate analysis showed that smoking (versus no smoking, HR 0.314, 95% CI 0.159-0.619, P=0.001) and AGTR1 A1166C AA genotype (versus AC/CC, HR 2.927, 95% CI 1.296-6.611, P=0.023) were significant and independent predictors of target attainment. 25 Patients (73.5%) with AGTR1 A1166C AC/CC genotype attained the target versus 51.2% (51/164) of patients with AGTR1 A1166C AA genotype (P=0.017). Patients with AGTR1 A1166C AC/CC genotype had a significantly greater reduction in systolic blood pressure [(33.1±10.8) mmHg versus (29.2±11.7) mmHg in AA carriers; P=0.029)]. Conclusions: Hypertensive patients carrying one or two C alleles of the AGTR1 A1166C gene were more responsive to valsartan treatment.

Five-Year Follow-Up of POLARIS-01 Phase II Trial: Toripalimab as Salvage Monotherapy in Chinese Patients With Advanced Melanoma.

To investigate the efficacy and toxicity after long-term follow-up of anti-PD-1 antibody in advanced melanoma with predominantly acral and mucosal subtypes. In the POLARIS-01 phase II trial, 128 Chinese patients with advanced melanoma refractory to standard therapy received toripalimab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity for ≤2 years. For those who progressed after discontinuation due to 2-year treatment completion, rechallenge was allowed. The primary objectives were safety and overall response rate (ORR). As of February 8, 2021, ORR was 17.3% (95% CI: 11.2-25.0) evaluated by the independent radiologic review committee. The median overall survival (OS) for patients with known melanoma subtypes was 16.3 m for acral, 41.5 m for nonacral cutaneous, and 10.3 m for mucosal melanoma. Thereafter, the evaluation was continued by investigators. As of November 4, 2022, 5 years after the last enrollment, median duration of response was 15.6 months (range, 3.7-64.5+), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months (95% CI, 2.2-5.3), and 60-month OS rate was 28.5% (95% CI: 20.2-37.2). Thirteen patients completed a 2-year treatment of toripalimab, with the subtypes of acral (2/13), non-acral cutaneous (4/13), mucosal (3/13) and unknown primary (4/13). Five patients were rechallenged. Four of them, all of whom were non-mucosal, completed the rechallenge course of 2 years with PFS ≥ 24 months. This is the largest prospective anti-PD-1 trial with mature data in advanced melanoma in China. Toripalimab demonstrated a manageable safety profile and durable clinical response in Chinese patients with metastatic melanoma who had failed in standard therapy. Immunotherapy seems less efficacious for long-term responders with mucosal primaries as rechallenge therapy.

Loncastuximab Tesirine Demonstrated Substantial Single-Agent Efficacy and Manageable Safety Profile in Heavily Pretreated Chinese Patients with Relapsed or Refractory (R/R) Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL)

Introduction: Patients with R/R DLBCL who failed multi-agent chemoimmunotherapies usually have a poor prognosis, leaving a significant unmet medical need. Loncastuximab tesirine (Lonca) is an antibody-drug conjugate, composed of a humanized anti-CD19 antibody conjugated to a pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer toxin that showed clinical efficacy and manageable safety in heavily pretreated DLBCL patients in a global phase 2 study of Lonca monotherapy (NCT03075696). Here we present results from a phase 2 study (ChiCTR2300072058) of Lonca monotherapy in Chinese patients with R/R DLBCL for the first time, including analyses of responses in high-risk DLBCL subgroups. Methods: This open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study was designed to confirm the safety, efficacy and PK profiles of Lonca monotherapy in Chinese patients with R/R DLBCL who had failed ≥ 2 lines of systemic therapies. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) as assessed by IRC according to the Lugano 2014 criteria. Secondary efficacy endpoints include complete response rate (CRR), DOR, RFS, PFS, and OS. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by CTCAE v4.0. Results: As of data cutoff (11-Jan-2023), 64 Chinese patients with DLBCL were enrolled and received at least one dose of Lonca (median: 4.0 cycles [range: 1-17]) and were evaluable for safety and efficacy analyses. The median number of prior lines of therapies was 3.0 (range: 2-12), with 67.2% of patients having ≥ 3 lines of prior therapies. Four patients (6.3%) had received prior CD19 CAR-T therapy. Forty-three patients (67.2%) were refractory to the first-line therapy (primary refractory), 56 patients (87.5%) were refractory to the most recent line of therapy and 40 patients (62.5%) were refractory to all prior lines of therapies. At data cutoff, the median follow-up was 8.5 months. The ORR by IRC was 51.6% (95% CI: 38.7% to 64.2%), and CRR was 23.4%. The median DOR (mDOR) was 6.37 months as assessed either by IRC or by investigator. For patients with a CR, the mDOR was 10.22 months (6.08 months for patients with PR). The median time to first response was 41.0 days. The median PFS and median OS were 4.96 and 9.33 months, respectively. Responses, including CRs, were observed in several high-risk subgroups (Fig. 1): ORR was 54.7% in patients with advanced stage disease (Stage III/IV) and 50.0% in patients with transformed disease. Patients who were refractory to first-line therapy, to the most recent therapy, or to all prior therapies had ORRs of 44.2%, 51.8% and 42.5%, respectively. Three patients who had received a prior SCT had an ORR of 100%. Lonca was also effective in elderly patients ≥ 65 years (ORR of 45.8%, mDOR of 6.37 months) and in patients who had received prior CD19 CAR-T therapy (ORR of 50%). Overall, 64 (100%) patients had at least one TEAE and 61 (95.3%) patients had at least one TEAE ≥ Grade 3. The most common (≥30%) all-grade TEAEs were GGT increased (71.9%), followed by anaemia (70.3%), platelet count decreased (65.6%), AST increased (64.1%), WBC count decreased (64.1%), neutrophil count decreased (60.9%), ALT increased (51.6%), hypokalaemia (37.5%), and blood ALP increased (32.8%). The most common (≥15%) TEAEs of Grade ≥3 were platelet count decreased (34.4%), neutrophil count decreased (28.1%), WBC count decreased (28.1%), GGT increased (25.0%), anaemia (18.8%), hypokalaemia (18.8%), neutropenia (17.2%), and lymphocyte count decreased (15.6%). The rate of febrile neutropenia was low (3.1%). The majority of Grade ≥ 3 TEAEs were abnormalities of clinical laboratory values as opposed to clinical symptoms and were generally reversible. Treatment-related TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 10 patients (15.6%), most commonly GGT increased (3 patients; 4.7%). No increase in toxicity was seen in patients aged ≥65 years compared with younger patients. Conclusions: Lonca demonstrated substantial and clinically meaningful single-agent efficacy and was well-tolerated in heavily pretreated Chinese patients with R/R DLBCL. Toxicities were generally manageable and reversible in most patients by routine clinical practice and/or with dose modifications, with neither unexpected safety concerns nor different toxicity profile in patients aged ≥65 years. Encouraging and durable responses were also observed in high-risk patient groups, including patients with advanced stage, transformed or refractory DLBCL.

A Novel Dual Covalent and Non-Covalent Next Generation Inhibitor of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase LP-168 in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Safety and Efficacy Results from a Phase 1 Study

Background: Covalent (c) Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) have improved clinical outcomes and revolutionized the treatment landscape of several B cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (B-NHL), including chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). However, cBTKi intolerance and resistance remain the main causes of treatment failure. LP-168 is a highly selective, next-generation BTKi with high bioavailability and potency. It can act as a cBTKi which irreversibly inhibits wildtype BTK while can overcome the resistance of cBTKi by non-covalent binding and reversible inhibition of C481 mutated BTK. In this abstract are the results from a Phase 1 trial (NCT04993690) that evaluates the safety and efficacy of LP-168 monotherapy in Chinese patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-NHL. Methods: This multicenter Phase 1 study contains a “3+3” dose escalation part (Phase 1a) followed by a dose expansion part (Phase 1b). Subjects with R/R B-NHL are eligible to receive LP-168 once daily treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. This study was designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of LP-168. The efficacy assessment was based on Lugano 2014, 2018 International Workshop on CLL (iwCLL) and the 6 th International Workshop for WM response criteria. Results: Between 10 August 2021 and 31 May 2023, 68 subjects (33 MCL, 14 diffuse large B cell lymphoma [DLBCL], 15 marginal zone lymphoma [MZL], 3 CLL/SLL, 2 follicular lymphoma [FL] and 1 primary mediastinal large B cell lymphoma [PMBCL]) were enrolled. Cohorts of 100 mg (N=13) 150 mg (N=40) and 200 mg (N=15) taken QD were treated respectively. The median age was 59.2 (range, 32-79) years old; 22 (64.7%) were male. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range, 1-10) and 25 (36.8%) subjects had received at least a cBTKi-containing regimen. The median follow-up was 4.5 (0.3-21.3) months with 46 subjects remaining on treatment. No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed during dose escalation from 100mg QD, 150mg QD to 200mg QD, and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurring in ≥20% subjects included neutropenia, platelet count decreased and anemia, most of which were Grade 1 or 2 (as detailed in Table 1). ≥Grade 3 treatment related adverse events (TRAEs, including possibly related, probably related and definitely related) included neutropenia (7.4%), lung infection (2.9%), lymphopenia, leukocytosis, lymphocytosis and oral cavity infection (1.5% each). 9 (13.2%) subjects experienced Serious Adverse Event (SAE). Serious adverse reactions included lung infection, oral cavity infection and lymphocytosis. No major bleeding, hypertension, or atrial fibrillation was observed in this study. Dose reduction occurred in only 1 subject due to AE (immune-mediated pancreatitis, unlikely related). No TEAE led to drug discontinuation. 1 subject experienced Grade 5 lung infection (not related to LP-168). Of 60 efficacy-evaluable subjects, overall response rate (ORR) was 65.0%. In particular, ORR in R/R MCL (N=31) was 77.4% with a CR of 38.7%, non-GCB DLBCL (N=10) had an ORR of 70.0% with a CR of 40.0% and MZL (N=11) had an ORR of 72.7% with a CR of 9.1% (Figure 1). LP-168 steady state plasma exposure increases dose-dependently with limited accumulation at 100 to 200 mg. Plasma concentration peaks at approximately 2 to 3 hours at fasted state, the average terminal half-life was 15.1 hours, supporting once daily dosing. Conclusion: The current results of the Phase 1 study showed that LP-168 was well tolerated at 100-200 mg QD with favorable PK profile and has demonstrated encouraging efficacy in multiple B-cell malignancies, including those who had progressed on prior cBTKi.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and efficacy of pemigatinib (a selective inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1–3) monotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors: a phase i clinical trial

Pemigatinib is a selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)1–3 inhibitor and has demonstrated acceptable tolerability and clinical activity in advanced solid tumors in Western population. This phase I trial evaluated pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) characteristics, preliminary safety and efficacy of pemigatinib in Chinese patients with advanced, solid tumors. Patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic solid tumors bearing FGF/FGFR1-3 alterations received oral pemigatinib at 13.5 mg once daily (QD) on a 2-weeks-on/1-week-off schedule. The primary endpoint was PK/PD characteristics; secondary endpoints were safety and efficacy. Twelve patients were enrolled (median age: 61 years, 58.3% males). PK data demonstrated pemigatinib (13.5 mg QD) was rapidly absorbed with a geometric mean elimination half-life of 11.3 h. The geometric mean values of maximum serum concentration and area under the plasma concentration–time curve from 0 to 24 h at steady state were 215.1 nmol/L and 2636.9 h·nmol/L, respectively. The mean clearance adjusted by bioavailability at steady state was low (11.8 L/h), and the apparent oral volume of distribution was moderate (170.5 L). The PD marker, serum phosphate level, increased on days 8 and 15 of cycle 1 (mean: 2.25 mg/dL, CV% [percent coefficient of variation]: 31.3%) and decreased to baseline post 1 week off. Three (25.0%) patients experienced grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events. Partial response was confirmed in one patient with FGFR1-mutant esophageal carcinoma and one with FGFR2-mutant cholagiocarcinoma. Pemigatinib had similar PK/PD characteristics to Western population and demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and potential anti-cancer benefit in Chinese patients with FGF/FGFR1-3 altered, advanced, solid tumor. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04258527 [prospectively registered February 6, 2020]).

A phase I study of subcutaneous envafolimab (KN035) monotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors

Objective: To evaluate the safety and antitumor activity of envafolimab monotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: This open-label, multicenter phase I trial included dose escalation and dose expansion phases. In the dose escalation phase, patients received subcutaneous 0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0 or 10.0 mg/kg envafolimab once weekly (QW) following a modified "3+ 3" design. The dose expansion phase was performed in the 2.5 mg/kg and 5.0 mg/kg (QW) dose cohorts. Results: At November 25, 2019, a total of 287 patients received envafolimab treatment. During the dose escalation phase, no dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) was observed. In all dose cohorts, drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) for all grades occurred in 75.3% of patients, and grade 3 or 4 occurred in 20.6% of patients. The incidence of immune-related adverse reactions (irAE) was 24.0% for all grades, the most common irAEs (≥2%) included hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, immune-associated hepatitis and rash. The incidence of injection site reactions was low (3.8%), all of which were grades 1-2. Among the 216 efficacy evaluable patients, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 11.6% and 43.1%, respectively. Median duration of response was 49.1 weeks (95% CI: 24.0, 49.3). Pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure to envafolimab is proportional to dose and median time to maximum plasma concentration is 72-120 hours based on the PK results from the dose escalation phase of the study. Conclusion: Subcutaneous envafolimab has a favorable safety and promising preliminary anti-tumor activity in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors.

670P Preliminary efficacy and safety of tinengotinib (TT-00420) monotherapy in Chinese patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors: Results from a phase Ib/II study

670P Preliminary efficacy and safety of tinengotinib (TT-00420) monotherapy in Chinese patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors: Results from a phase Ib/II study

A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cetagliptin added to ongoing metformin therapy in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes with metformin monotherapy.

This trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of cetagliptin added to metformin in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes who had inadequate glycaemic control with metformin monotherapy. In total, 446 patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin monotherapy were randomized to receive the addition of once-daily cetagliptin 100 mg, cetagliptin 50 mg and placebo in a 2:2:1 ratio for 24-week double-blind treatment. At week 24, patients initially randomized to cetagliptin 50 mg and placebo were switched to cetagliptin 100 mg for 28 weeks open-label treatment. The primary endpoint was the change in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline, and the efficacy analyses were based on an all-patients-treated population using an analysis of co-variance. After 24 weeks, both add-on therapies led to greater glycaemic control. Reductions in HbA1c from baseline were -1.17 ± 0.794%, -1.23 ± 0.896% in cetagliptin 100 mg and 50 mg plus metformin group, respectively. No difference was observed between the cetagliptin 100 mg and 50 mg plus metformin group. Patients with higher baseline HbA1c levels (≥8.5%) experienced greater reductions in HbA1c. A significantly greater proportion of patients achieved an HbA1c <7.0% with cetagliptin 100 mg (49.4%) and cetagliptin 50 mg (51.1%) plus metformin than metformin monotherapy (14.4%). Both combination therapies also improved the homeostasis model assessment β-function index and decreased systolic blood pressure. There was no increased risk of adverse effects with combination therapy, and both combination therapies were generally well tolerated. The addition of cetagliptin once daily to metformin was more efficacious and well tolerated than metformin monotherapy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes who had inadequate glycaemic control with metformin monotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of cetagliptin as monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.

To assess the efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, cetagliptin, as monotherapy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and inadequate glycaemic control. In total, 504 eligible patients with T2D were enrolled and randomized to cetagliptin 50 mg once daily, cetagliptin 100 mg once daily or placebo at a ratio of 2:2:1 for 24 weeks of double-blind treatment, then all patients received cetagliptin 100 mg once daily for 28 weeks of open-label treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in HbA1c level from baseline at week 24. After 24 weeks, HbA1c from baseline was significantly reduced with cetagliptin 50 mg (-1.08%) and cetagliptin 100 mg (-1.07%) compared with placebo (-0.35%). The placebo-subtracted HbA1c reduction was -0.72% with cetagliptin 50 mg and 100 mg. Patients with a baseline HbA1c of 8.5% or higher had a greater HbA1c reduction with cetagliptin than those patients with a baseline HbA1c of less than 8.5%. Both doses studied led to a significantly higher proportion of patients (42.3% with 100 mg and 45.0% with 50 mg) achieving an HbA1c of less than 7.0% compared with placebo (12.9%). Cetagliptin also significantly lowered fasting plasma glucose and 2-hour postmeal plasma glucose relative to placebo. The incidence of adverse experiences was similar between cetagliptin and placebo. No drug-related hypoglycaemia was reported. Cetagliptin monotherapy was effective and well tolerated in Chinese patients with T2D who had inadequate glycaemic control on exercise and diet.

Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab in Chinese patients with previously treated locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: An open-label, single-arm, multicenter study

ObjectivesTo evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of atezolizumab monotherapy in Chinese patients with previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials and MethodsIn this open-label, single-arm, multicenter study, patients received atezolizumab 1200 mg intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was incidence of atezolizumab-related serious adverse events (SAEs). Secondary endpoints included other safety and efficacy measures. Patients with available tumor tissue and blood samples underwent biomarker analyses. Patients with available tumor biopsies underwent exome sequencing. ResultsThe safety and evaluable populations included 101 and 97 patients, respectively. Exome sequencing data were available for 31 patients. Median follow-up time was 27.43 months. Atezolizumab-related SAEs and immune-related adverse events occurred in 25.7% and 47.5% of the safety population, respectively, and in the following subgroups: central nervous system metastases (n = 14), 35.7% and 35.7%; squamous NSCLC (n = 39), 33.3% and 53.8%. The 24-month overall survival rate was 37.4%. Median overall survival and progression-free survival by RECIST v1.1 were 15.31 and 2.86 months, respectively; objective response rate was 16.5% in the evaluable population. PRRC2C (odds ratio: 12.780, P = 0.014) and ZMYND8 (odds ratio: 19.963, P = 0.016) gene mutations were significantly enriched in atezolizumab responders vs non-responders. Patients with CD8+ TILs > 10% vs ≤ 10% were significantly more likely to be atezolizumab responders. ConclusionNo new safety concerns were raised, and clinically meaningful benefits of atezolizumab monotherapy were shown. The results of the biomarker analyses may guide future therapeutic strategies.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and antitumor activity of talazoparib monotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors

Talazoparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of advanced breast and prostate cancers in Western populations. This open-label, phase 1 study investigated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and antitumor activity of talazoparib monotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors. Molecularly unselected patients (≥18 years) with advanced solid tumors resistant to standard therapy received talazoparib (oral, 1 mg once daily). Primary endpoint was characterization of single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics. Secondary endpoints evaluated safety, unconfirmed objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response. The safety population comprised 15 Chinese patients (median [range] age 53.0 [31.0–72.0] years). Single-dose median time to first occurrence of maximum observed concentration was 1.9 h; concentrations then declined with a mean terminal half-life (t1/2) of 67 h. Following multiple dosing, median Tmax was approximately 1.85 h with steady state generally achieved by Day 21. Treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 86.7% (13/15) of patients (grade 3, 20.0%; grade 4, 13.3%). Two patients (13.3%) experienced serious treatment-related TEAEs. ORR (investigator-assessed) was 6.7% (95% CI: 0.2–31.9); one patient (6.7%) had a partial response. In patients with measurable disease at baseline, the ORR was 9.1% (1/11; 95% CI: 0.2–41.3; duration of response: 114 days); stable disease was achieved by 36.4% (4/11) of patients, and 54.5% (6/11) progressed by data cut-off. In Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors, the pharmacokinetic profile of talazoparib monotherapy (1 mg/day) was consistent with other patient populations. TEAEs were generally manageable with no unexpected safety findings. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04635631 [prospectively registered November 19, 2020])

Efficacy and safety of janagliflozin monotherapy in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on diet and exercise: A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 trial.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of janagliflozin, a selective renal sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor, as monotherapy in drug-naive Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This Phase 3 trial included a 24-week, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled period, followed by a 28-week extension period. A total of 432 patients with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels ≥7.0% (53 mmol/mol) and ≤10.5% (91 mmol/mol) were randomized (1:1:1) to receive once-daily placebo, 25 mg or 50 mg janagliflozin. After 24 weeks, patients on placebo were switched and re-randomized (1:1) to 25 mg or 50 mg janagliflozin, whereas patients on janagliflozin maintained the initial therapy. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in HbA1c after 24 weeks. At Week 24, the placebo-adjusted least squares mean changes in HbA1c were -0.80%(95% confidence interval [CI] -0.98%to -0.62%)/-8.7mmol/mol(95%CI-10.7mmol/molto-6.8mmol/mol) and -0.88% (95% CI -1.06% to -0.70%)/-9.6 mmol/mol (95% CI -11.6mmol/molto-7.7mmol/mol), respectively (P <0.001 for both). A higher proportion of patients achieved HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) with janagliflozin 25 mg and janagliflozin 50 mg compared with placebo (47.2%, 49.3%, and 23.5%, respectively). Both janagliflozin doses significantly decreased fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour postprandial glucose, body weight and systolic blood pressure, as well as increased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and insulin sensitivity compared with placebo (P <0.05 for all). The trends in improvement of these variables were sustained during the 28-week extension period. Overall incidences of adverse events were 67.8%, 71.5% and 60.7% with janagliflozin 25 mg, janagliflozin 50 mg and placebo, respectively. The incidence of urinary tract infections and genital fungal infections was low. No severe hypoglycaemia or ketoacidosis occurred. Janagliflozin 25 mg and 50 mg monotherapy once-daily effectively improved glycaemic control, reduced body weight and blood pressure, improved HDL cholesterol and insulin sensitivity, and was generally well tolerated.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Ezetimibe/Atorvastatin Fixed-dose Combination Versus Atorvastatin Monotherapy in Hypercholesterolemia: A Phase III, Randomized, Active-controlled Study in Chinese Patients

PurposeThe 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl–coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (“statins”) and the cholesterol-lowering medication ezetimibe are widely used in the treatment of patients with high- and very high–risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of ezetimibe/atorvastatin (EZ/AS) with those of escalating doses of atorvastatin monotherapy in Chinese patients with hypercholesterolemia uncontrolled with statin monotherapy. MethodsThis Phase III, 12-week, randomized, double-blind study included patients aged 18 to 80 years with hypercholesterolemia uncontrolled on atorvastatin 10 or 20 mg/d monotherapy. After a 5-week run-in period of treatment with atorvastatin 10 or 20 mg/d (cohorts A and B, respectively), or a bioequivalent dosage of another statin, patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio within each cohort to receive EZ/AS 10/10 mg FDC (EZ10/AS10) or atorvastatin 20 mg (AS20), once daily (cohort A); or EZ/AS 10/20 mg FDC (EZ10/AS20) or atorvastatin 40 mg (AS40), once daily (cohort B). The primary end point was the percentage change from baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Tolerability was also evaluated. FindingsOf the 454 patients enrolled, 412 (90.7%) completed the study. The percentage change from baseline in LDL-C was statistically greater with EZ10/AS10 treatment (n = 88) compared with AS20 monotherapy (n = 89) (treatment difference, −19.5%; 95% CI, −26.7% to −12.3%; P < 0.001). The percentage change from baseline in LDL-C was statistically greater with EZ10/AS20 treatment (n = 137) compared with AS40 monotherapy (n = 140) (treatment difference, −15.9%; 95% CI, −21.0% to −10.7%; P < 0.001). The safety profile was comparable between the EZ/AS and atorvastatin groups in the two cohorts. ImplicationsThe LDL-C level at week 12 was significantly improved with both FDCs compared with escalated doses of atorvastatin (20 or 40 mg/d) in these Chinese patients with hypercholesterolemia uncontrolled on atorvastatin 10 or 20 mg/d. Both FDCs were well tolerated, with no new tolerability-related findings. Chinadrugtrials.org.cn identifier: CTR20190172; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03768427

Updated Results from the Phase II Study of Orelabrutinib Monotherapy in Chinese Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Cell Leukemia

Orelabrutinib (ICP-022) is a novel and highly selective irreversible BTK inhibitor. We previously reported that orelabrutinib had high bioavailability with ~100% BTK occupancy at 24 hours at 150 mg daily dosing regimen and demonstrated excellent safety and efficacy profiles at median follow-up of 8.7 months in a Phase I/II trial of refractory/relapsed (r/r) CLL/SLL (Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Cell Leukemia). Here we present an updated analysis of efficacy and safety results from the clinical study of Orelabrutinib in Chinese patients with r/r CLL/SLL following extended treatment. This is an open-label, multicenter, phase II study with objectives to evaluate its safety and efficacy following an oral daily administration. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). The duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety were chosen as secondary endpoints. Response was assessed per 2008 IWCLL criteria with modification for partial remission (PR) with lymphocytosis (PR-L) (Hallek 2012) or the Lugano Classification (Cheson, 2014) for CLL and SLL, respectively. Results: A total of 80 patients with r/r CLL (n=70)/SLL (n=10) were enrolled. Eligible patients had relapsed after or were refractory to ≥1 prior treatment with median age of 60.0 (range, 36.0-78.0 years). There are 70% of patients for Rai stage 3-4 disease, 22.5% for 17p13.1 deletion [del(17p)] and/or TP53 mutation, 41.3% for unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (IGHV) and 23.8% for 11q22.3 deletion [del(11q)]. The median follow-up time was 14.3 months (range, 0.2-21.6 months), and the last patient completed a minimum of 12 cycles of orelabrutinib treatment. Efficacy: The efficacy results presented here were evaluated by IRC (Independent review committee). Following a minimum of 12 cycles treatment, the ORR (PR-L or above) was 91.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.80 ~ 96.41%) with 10.0% of patients having complete response (CR), 63.8% PR and 17.5% PR-L. Median time for achieving first response was 1.87 months (range, 1.84 - 1.94 months). The median DOR and PFS were not reached. The estimated 12-month DOR was 77.1% (95% CI: 62.50-86.60%), PFS 81.1% (95% CI: 70.53 - 88.13%) and OS 86.3% (95% CI: 76.55 - 92.14%). Patients with Del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation achieved 100% ORR. The ORR is 94.7% for Del(11q)) and 93.9% for unmutated IGHV. Comparing to the first analysis results of which the median follow-up was 8.7 months, the CR rate had increased from 3.8% to 10.0%, and 8 patients with PR-L had converted to a deeper response. So, orelabrutinib showed a significant higher CR rate comparing to other BTK inhibitors at a similar treatment period and we anticipate a further increase of CR rate with longer duration of treatment. Safety: Most adverse events (AEs) were mild to moderate, similar to the first reported safety profiles at median follow-up of 8.7 months. Extended follow-up analysis did not reveal new safety nor toxicity concerns. The most frequent adverse events (AEs) of any cause/any grade were well characterized as hematological toxicities: thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and anemia; upper respiratory tract infection, pneumonia and hypokalemia. No case of atrial fibrillation nor secondary malignancy was reported, no patient was observed for ≥3 hypertension and only one patient had ≥3 grade diarrhea. Major hemorrhage was reported in 2 patients, one with intracranial hemorrhage (65-year-old male patient with more than 10 years hypertension) and the other with vitreous hemorrhage which were resulted from posterior vitreous detachment that was assessed as unlikely related to the treatment of orelabrutinib. Once again, it has been further confirmed that orelabrutinib has excellent safety profiles following extended treatment. Conclusion: This updated and extended study further confirms that orelabrutinib is efficacious in treating r/r CLL patients with a higher CR rate, durable response and improved safety profiles. As a highly selective BTK inhibitor with favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, orelabrutinib provides a favorable therapeutic choice for patients with r/r CLL/SLL and a potential best candidate for combination therapy. Disclosures Zhu: Beijing InnoCare Pharma Tech Co., Ltd: Current Employment. Zhao:Beijing InnoCare Pharma Tech Co., Ltd: Current Employment. Zhang:Beijing InnoCare Pharma Tech Co., Ltd: Current Employment. Xu:Beijing InnoCare Pharma Tech Co., Ltd: Current Employment.

945-P: A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Dose Cohort Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 12 Once-Weekly Subcutaneous Doses of PB-119 to Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus as Monotherapy

Background: PB119 (polyethylene glycol exenatide) which is a novel once-weekly subcutaneous GLP-1RA, has good pharmacokinetic properties. As a GLP-1RA, it shows a good safety profile and provides solid glycemic control while doesn’t need dose titration. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of PB119 monotherapy in Chinese patients with T2DM. Methods: In this phase 2 study, we randomly assigned 251 patients (1:1:1:1) to receive 3 doses of PB119 (75ug, 150ug, 200ug) or dose-matched placebo using permuted-block randomization, with a block size of 12 and without stratification. Eligible patients were men or women (aged 18-70 years) with T2DM who had a BMI of 18.5-35.0 kg/m², were on a diet and exercise regimen and untreated at least 3 months prior to screening. The study started with a 4-week placebo run-in period followed by a 12-week treatment period. The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c from baseline to week 12, which was assessed in all patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had both baseline and at least 1 post-baseline HbA1c value. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03520972. Findings: At the end of week 12, the least squares mean change in HbA1c from baseline was -0.39% (95% CI -0.60 to -0.19) in the placebo group, -1.11% (-1.32 to -0.91) in the 75ug group, -1.57% (-1.78 to -1.37) in the 150ug group and -1.41% (-1.61 to -1.20) in the 200ug group. Compared with the placebo group, the change in HbA1c between baseline and week 12 was significant in all PB119 (p&amp;lt;0.001) groups. Significant reductions in TC and TG were observed in 150ug and 200ug groups (P&amp;lt;0.05), while the reductions in body weight and LDL-C were significant in 200ug group (P&amp;lt;0.05). There were no reports of drug-related serious adverse events or severe hypoglycemia. Disclosure M. Xu: None.

Add-on pegylated interferon augments hepatitis B surface antigen clearance vs continuous nucleos(t)ide analog monotherapy in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B and hepatitis B surface antigen ≤ 1500 IU/mL: An observational study.

BACKGROUNDNucleos(t)ide analog (NA) has shown limited effectiveness against hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) clearance in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.AIMTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of add-on peginterferon α-2a (peg-IFN α-2a) to an ongoing NA regimen in CHB patients.METHODSIn this observational study, 195 CHB patients with HBsAg ≤ 1500 IU/mL, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative (including HBeAg-negative patients or HBeAg-positive patients who achieved HBeAg-negative after antiviral treatment with NA) and hepatitis B virus-deoxyribonucleic acid < 1.0 × 102 IU/mL after over 1 year of NA therapy were enrolled between November 2015 and December 2018 at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, China. Patients were given the choice between receiving either peg-IFN α-2a add-on therapy to an ongoing NA regimen (add-on group, n = 91) or continuous NA monotherapy (monotherapy group, n = 104) after being informed of the benefits and risks of the peg-IFN α-2a therapy. Total therapy duration of peg-IFN α-2a was 48 wk. All patients were followed-up to week 72 (24 wk after discontinuation of peg-IFN α-2a). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with HBsAg clearance at week 72.RESULTSDemographic and baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Intention-to-treatment analysis showed that the HBsAg clearance rate in the add-on group and monotherapy group was 37.4% (34/91) and 1.9% (2/104) at week 72, respectively. The HBsAg seroconversion rate in the add-on group was 29.7% (27/91) at week 72, and no patient in the monotherapy group achieved HBsAg seroconversion at week 72. The HBsAg clearance and seroconversion rates in the add-on group were significantly higher than in the monotherapy group at week 72 (P < 0.001). Younger patients, lower baseline HBsAg concentration, lower HBsAg concentrations at weeks 12 and 24, greater HBsAg decline from baseline to weeks 12 and 24 and the alanine aminotransferase ≥ 2 × upper limit of normal during the first 12 wk of therapy were strong predictors of HBsAg clearance in patients with peg-IFN α-2a add-on treatment. Regarding the safety of the treatment, 4.4% (4/91) of patients in the add-on group discontinued peg-IFN α-2a due to adverse events. No severe adverse events were noted.CONCLUSIONPeg-IFN α-2a as an add-on therapy augments HBsAg clearance in HBeAg-negative CHB patients with HBsAg ≤ 1500 IU/mL after over 1 year of NA therapy.

Model‐Based Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Nivolumab in Chinese Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Solid Tumors, Including Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Nivolumab is the first anti–programmed death‐1 agent approved in China for treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we characterize the population pharmacokinetics (PPK) of nivolumab monotherapy in Chinese patients with previously treated advanced/recurrent solid tumors, including NSCLC and nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC), using data from 2 predominantly Chinese (CheckMate 077 and 078), and 5 global (MDX1106‐01, CA209‐003, and CheckMate 017, 057, and 063) studies. The PPK model was developed by reestimating parameters of a prior global population model with Chinese patient data. Model reestimates showed nivolumab pharmacokinetics (PK) to be linear and dose proportional. Race did not have a clinically meaningful effect on nivolumab clearance. Body weight, Asian race, sex, and performance status had significant effects on clearance. Baseline clearance was 9% lower in the Asian versus the global population but not considered clinically relevant. Change in time‐varying clearance and predicted nivolumab exposures with 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (Q2W) were similar in Chinese, non‐Chinese Asian, and non‐Asian patients. In Chinese patients, the predicted nivolumab exposure with a 240‐mg Q2W regimen was ∼25% higher than with 3 mg/kg Q2W, but ∼62% lower than that of a previously evaluated, well‐tolerated regimen of 10 mg/kg Q2W (global population). Differences in nivolumab baseline clearance and exposures between patients with NPC and NSCLC were not clinically meaningful (<20%). Overall, PPK analysis demonstrated that nivolumab was not sensitive to race when evaluated in Chinese and non‐Asian patients and exhibited similar PK in NSCLC and NPC.

Efficacy and safety of rasagiline in Chinese patients with early Parkinson\u2019s disease: a randomized, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose study

BackgroundRasagiline is a monoamine oxidase-B inhibitor used for Parkinson’s disease (PD) treatment, but its effectiveness on Chinese patients is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rasagiline monotherapy in Chinese patients with early PD.MethodsA 26-weeks, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study has been performed at 15 sites in China and enrolled outpatients (≥35 years old) with idiopathic PD without a history of using any dopaminergic drugs. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive rasagiline 1 mg once daily or placebo. The primary endpoint was the change of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) total score from baseline to 26 weeks treatment. Secondary endpoints included changes in UPDRS subscale scores from part I to III. Health status was assessed with the PD Questionnaire (PDQ)-39 and EuroQol-Five-Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire. Safety profile was collected until 30 weeks after randomization.ResultsA total of 130 patients (n = 65/group) were recruited, and 127 (rasagiline, n = 64; placebo, n = 63) were included in the full analysis set. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The decrease in the mean UPDRS total score was greater in the rasagiline group than in the placebo group (− 3.18 ± 0.95 vs. − 0.18 ± 0.98, P = 0.025), and the mean UPDRS part I non-motor symptoms score (− 0.54 ± 0.15 vs. -0.08 ± 0.15, P = 0.003) were significantly decreased in the rasagiline group compared with placebo treated patients. An improvement trend was observed in the active treatment group for the subscales evaluation with parts II and III, while the difference to placebo was not statistically significant. Life quality assessed by the EQ-5D visual analog scale improved in the rasagiline group but worsened in placebo treated patients. The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) was slightly lower in the rasagiline group (41.5%) than in the placebo group (46.2%).ConclusionsRasagiline is effective, safe, and well tolerated as monotherapy for the treatment of Chinese PD patients.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov: NCT01556165. Registered 13 Mar 2012.

154O - Atezolizumab monotherapy in Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours

154O - Atezolizumab monotherapy in Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours