Monocular Acuity Research Articles

Clinical Evaluation of Violet Light Filtration and High-Resolution Lathing on a Diffractive Extended Depth of Focus IOL.

This study is a prospective, randomized, subject/evaluator-masked clinical trial in a single-center clinical setting. The purpose of the study is to compare the clinical performance of Tecnis Symfony Optiblue IOL (models ZXR00V and ZXW150) with violet light filter (VLF) and manufacturing improvements versus Tecnis Symfony IOL (models ZXR00 and ZXT150) with ultraviolet light filter (UVF) in patients undergoing cataract surgery. Patients with cataracts aged ≥ 22years were randomly assigned 1:1 to bilateral implantation with ZXR00V/ZXW150 (VLF group) or ZXR00/ZXT150 (UVF group). Key endpoints at 6months postoperative included patient reported nighttime dysphotopsia symptoms, 25% low contrast visual acuity with glare, and patient satisfaction. Sixty patients were implanted with ZXR00V/ZXW150 (30) or ZXR00/ZXT150 (30). At 6months, the VLF group did not show a statistically significant differences in mean monocular photopic uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA) (40cm), or distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) (40cm) compared to the UVF group. At 1month, patients in the VLF group reported significantly less difficulty due to halo (p = 0.016) and starburst (p = 0.028) symptoms. By the 6months, dysphotopsia complaints were no longer significantly different between the groups. Although the VLF group trended toward better low contrast visual acuity and patient satisfaction, statistical significance was not reached. Managing the patients' expectations is key to achieving success. At the 1-month visit the patients who reported dysphotopsia complaints in the VLF group had significantly less difficulty with starbursts and halos as compared to the UVF group. By the 6-month visit, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the difficulty with starbursts and halos. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT06567834.

Non-orthogonal spectacle correction for irregular astigmatism.

To investigate the potential improvement in visual acuity and subjective perception of image quality in patients with keratoconus using non-orthogonal correction (NOC) cylinder trial lenses where the steep and flat power meridians are set at angles less or greater than 90°. A set of NOC plano/cylindrical trial lenses, where the axes between the power meridians were set at a range of non-orthogonal angles, were used to refract 18 participants with keratoconus in whom 23 eyes were used for testing. Corneal elevation data were processed by bespoke MATLAB code from Pentacam Scheimpflug tomographer scans. Each participant first underwent subjective refraction using standard orthogonal cylinder trial lenses, and the monocular best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR) was recorded for each eye. They then underwent a second subjective refraction using NOC cylinder trial lenses created for the study and completed a questionnaire to elicit their subjective appraisal of letter clarity and ghosting. Fourteen (61%) eyes demonstrated an increase in objective BCVA with the NOC versus the orthogonal correction; seven (30%) eyes showed no change and in two (9%) eyes, the BCVA was slightly worse. Further, 87% and 79% experienced an increase in letter clarity and a reduction in ghosting, respectively, independent of changes in BCVA. The majority of non-orthogonal angles were in the range of 80°-85°, and it was possible to refine the cylinder and axis of the NOC further compared with the orthogonal correction. All but one of the participants said they would be interested in trying non-orthogonal spectacles if the opportunity arose. Correcting irregular astigmatism in keratoconic individuals with non-orthogonal spectacle correction may provide benefit in terms of increased visual acuity, improvements in letter clarity and a reduction of ghosting effects. This type of correction has the potential to improve the overall quality of life for patients with keratoconus.

Visual, Refractive, Functional, and Patient Satisfaction Outcomes After Implantation of a New Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lens.

To describe the visual, refractive, functional, and patient satisfaction outcomes of the Clareon® PanOptix® trifocal intraocular lens (IOL). This was a prospective longitudinal descriptive study. Patients who underwent cataract surgery with implantation of Clareon® PanOptix® (Alcon Laboratories, Inc.) were included. Monocular refractive outcomes and visual acuity at distance, intermediate, and near were evaluated 1- and 6-months post-op. Binocular contrast sensitivity (M&S® Technologies), binocular defocus curve, and patient satisfaction with the IOL Satisfaction (IOLSAT) and Questionnaire for Visual Disturbance (QUVID) questionaries were assessed at 6-month post-op. Seventy-six Clareon® PanOptix® were implanted bilaterally in 38 patients. The mean age of the patients was 67.63±5.18 years. At 1-month post-op, the monocular Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CDVA), CIVA and CNVA were 0.00±0.09, 0.02±0.17, and 0.12±0.12 LogMAR, respectively, and CDVA and CNVA were stable at 6-month post-op (p>0.05). No statistical differences were found in post-op spherical equivalent at 1 and 6 months (-0.08±0.27 D and -0.05±0.24 D; p=0.351). A 100% of eyes were within ±0.5 D at 1 month and 6-month post-op. Binocular defocus curve shows three peaks of maximum visual acuity (VA) at 0D (-0.04±0.08 LogMAR), at -1.50D, and -2.50 D (0.01±0.10 LogMAR and 0.03±0.07 LogMAR, respectively). Contrast sensitivity decreased at high spatial frequencies. In patient satisfaction, IOLSAT questionary reveals 78.94% patients "Never" or "Rarely" Needing Glasses and according QUVID questionnaire, 100% of patients report no hazy vision. The PanOptix® IOL platform with the new material Clareon® provides good visual outcomes for distance, intermediate, and near vision, with adequate contrast sensitivity and low visual disturbances.

Mobile assessment of visual function helps to prevent Re-Injury in elderly patients with recent hip fractures

IntroductionPatients undergoing surgery due to hip fracture face an elevated risk of a subsequent fall during rehabilitation. An important contributing factor to this risk is deteriorated visual function, often responsive to intervention. This study aims to explore differences in visual acuity (VA) and stereovision (SV) between individuals with a history of fall-related hip injuries (study group) and age-matched controls, utilizing a mobile application (EuvisionTab, ET) to distinguish age-related visual decline from pathological vision. Materials & MethodsA total of 32 and 71 participants were enrolled in the study and control groups, respectively (mean age: 74.9 years, range: 60–96). Monocular logMAR VA was measured using a tablet by means of an adaptive threshold-search algorithm. SV was assessed using low-dot density static and dynamic random dot stereograms. An age-dependent reference limit for VA was established. For ET stereotests, the number of correctly identified optotypes out of 10 random presentations served as the measure for further comparisons. Visually impaired status in the study group was determined if patients failed either the VA threshold or the SV criteria. ResultsIn the control group, an apparent but statistically nonsignificant decline in VA was observed, while stereovision remained stable and did not exhibit significant age-related variations based on ET stereotests. Conversely, the study group demonstrated significantly worse results in monocular VA (p = 0.0032) and for both stereotests (p = 0.018 for static, p = 0.036 for dynamic) according to paired samples t-test and chi-square test, respectively. Hip injuries were significantly associated with visual impairment (OR = 4.88, p = 0.0012). DiscussionThis study focuses on one possible risk factor of elderly falls, namely, vision impairment. Patients with visual decay present a higher incidence of hip injuries compared to age-matched controls. This data suggest that vision screening and, when feasible, restoration of visual function may contribute to the prevention of secondary falls, refractures, or contralateral fractures. A mobile-based screening protocol, executable as part of a postoperative bedside examination and independent of specialized eye care, can be proposed.

Evaluating the small aperture intraocular lens: depth of focus and the role of refraction and preoperative corneal astigmatism in visual performance.

To evaluate depth of focus (DOF) and visual acuities (VAs) by manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) and degree of preoperative corneal astigmatism with the IC-8 small aperture intraocular lens (SA IOL) (Apthera). 21 investigational sites in the United States. Prospective, multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, nonrandomized, examiner-masked, 1-year clinical study. Included patients had cataract and ≤1.5 diopters (D) preoperative corneal astigmatism. Patients received either the SA IOL in 1 eye targeted to -0.75 D and a monofocal or monofocal toric IOL in the other targeted to plano (SA IOL group) or bilateral monofocal/monofocal toric IOLs targeted to plano (control group). Monocular and binocular assessments included defocus curves and uncorrected VAs (distance, intermediate, and near) by postoperative MRSE; monocular VAs were assessed by degree of preoperative corneal astigmatism. The SA IOL group (n = 343) achieved 0.82 D additional binocular DOF vs the control group (n = 110), and SA IOL eyes achieved 0.91 D additional monocular DOF over fellow eyes. Across all MRSEs, the SA IOL group achieved monocular uncorrected VAs of 20/40 or better and binocular uncorrected VAs of 20/32 or better across all distances. In addition, SA IOL eyes with higher (1.0-1.5 D) vs lower (<1.0 D) preoperative corneal astigmatism achieved equivalent monocular uncorrected VAs. The SA IOL provides increased DOF vs monofocal/monofocal toric IOLs and consistent monocular and binocular vision across several postoperative MRSEs and up to 1.5 D of preoperative corneal astigmatism, giving patients with cataract and mild astigmatism the potential for an extended range of vision and reliable visual outcomes.

Relationship Between Low Visual Acuity and Nonfatal Occupational Same-Level Falls in Japanese Female Employees: A Cohort Study.

The incidence of work-related falls on the same level is increasing, particularly among middle-aged and older female workers. Vision is an important risk factor of falls. We investigated whether objectively measured visual acuity was associated with the incidence of falls. This cohort study included 7317 female employees aged 20-69 in Japanese supermarket stores. Monocular acuity measured during health checkups was classified into three levels (≥0.7, 0.3-0.7, <0.3). Incidence rate ratios of work-related falls within 1 year were estimated. Incidence rate ratios were 1.26 (95%CI: 0.92-1.72) in the 0.3-0.7 group and 2.27 (95%CI: 1.15-4.48) in the <0.3 group. Risk of work-related fall was higher in those with low visual acuity. Vision correction may contribute to fall prevention in workplaces.

Modified femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy for managing low corneal astigmatism using trifocal intraocular lens implantation in Chinese cataract patients.

To evaluate the visual outcome and astigmatic correction following trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation using the modified femtosecond laser-assisted arcuate keratotomy (FSAK) in Chinese cataract patients with low astigmatism. This retrospective study included consecutive cataract patients with regular corneal astigmatism ranging from 0.75 to 1.5 D who underwent FSAK combined with the trifocal IOL implantation between November 2020 and September 2022. Monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity, uncorrected intermediate visual acuity, uncorrected near visual acuity, and refractive data were collected at the 3-month follow-up. The pre- and post-operative high-order aberrations (HOAs) were recorded. The variation in astigmatism was analyzed using Alpins vector analysis. A total of 27 eyes from 23 patients were analyzed. The monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) (5 m) at the 3-month follow-up was 0.04 ± 0.09 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), which was significantly improved compared with the preoperative value of 0.95 ± 0.51 logMAR (P <.001). The corneal astigmatism was significantly reduced from 1.24 ± 0.42 D to 0.49 ± 0.34 D (P <.001). The target-induced astigmatism (TIA) was 1.25 ± 0.43 D, the surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) was 1.16 ± 0.52 D, and the difference vector (DV) was 0.5 ± 0.34 D. The magnitude of error (ME) (difference between SIA and TIA) was -0.1 ± 0.41 D, and the correction index (CI) (ratio of SIA to TIA) was 0.93 ± 0.36. The angle of error was 3.92° ± 16.90°. Total HOA was reduced from 0.89 ± 1.11 to 0.41 ± 0.55 (P = 0.184), and the corneal HOA was lowered from 0.17 ± 0.18 to 0.10 ± 0.10 (P = 0.129). Implantation of trifocal IOL following the modified FSAK in Chinese cataract patients exhibited excellent visual efficacy and effectively reduced corneal astigmatism.

Visual Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction After Bilateral Refractive Lens Exchange With a Trifocal Intraocular Lens in 5,226 Patients With Presbyopia.

To assess visual and refractive outcomes and visual function after bilateral RayOne Trifocal toric and nontoric intraocular lens (IOL) (Rayner) implantation in patients with presbyopia. Charts of patients with presbyopia who underwent refractive lens exchange with bilateral implantation of the RayOne Trifocal IOL (toric and non-toric) were retrospectively reviewed. Visual and refractive outcomes were evaluated at 3 months. Patient satisfaction, spectacle independence, and visual disturbance profile were assessed by questionnaires. A total of 5,226 patients were assigned to one of two groups: 1,010 patients had toric IOL implantation (toric group) and 4,216 patients received the non-toric model (non-toric group). Mean ± standard deviation visual acuity at 3 months for the toric group was binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 0.07 ± 0.11 logMAR, monocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) of 0.05 ± 0.07 logMAR, binocular uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) at 40 cm of 0.10 ± 0.09 logMAR, binocular uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) at 40 cm of 0.13 ± 0.12 logMAR, postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) of -0.21 ± 0.47 diopters (D), and cylinder of -0.34 ± 0.40 D. The non-toric group had binocular UDVA of 0.04 ± 0.08 logMAR, monocular CDVA of 0.05 ± 0.07 logMAR, binocular UNVA of 0.10 ± 0.08 logMAR, binocular UIVA of 0.13 ± 0.11 logMAR, SE of -0.08 ± 0.38 D, and cylinder of -0.28 ± 0.34 D. No statistically significant differences were found in achieving spectacle independence and there were high levels of satisfaction in both groups. In this retrospective analysis with more than 5,000 patients, both the toric and non-toric RayOne Trifocal IOL models provided good visual performance at all distances, resulting in excellent levels of spectacle independence and patient satisfaction. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(7):e468-e479.].

Unveiling Visual Acuity in 58,712 Four-Year-Olds: Standardized Assessment Defined Normative Visual Acuity Threshold.

The purpose was to define the threshold of normal visual acuity (VA), mean monocular and binocular VA, and interocular difference in the uniform cohort of healthy four-year-old children. All the children were recruited from the Croatian National Registry of Early Amblyopia Detection database. LEA Symbols® inline optotypes were used for VA testing at near and distance, binocularly and monocularly. The pass cut-off level was set to ≤0.1 logMAR. The final sample consisted of 58,712 four-year-old children. In total, 83.78% of the children had unremarkable results, and 16.22% of the children were referred to examination. Of those, 92% of the children were referred due to binocular, and 8% of the children due to monocular causes. The children referred due to binocular causes demonstrated a VA of 0.3 ± 0.24, while the children referred due to monocular causes 0.6 ± 0.21. The ROC curve analysis defined the uniform cut-off value for a normative VA of 0.78. We analyzed the largest uniform cohort of 58,712 children, and have determined normative data for binocular and monocular VA tested with gold standard logMAR chart in four-year-old children. The results presented here established no reasoning to further utilize historical protocols in testing VA in preschool children aged ≥ 4 years.

Fellow-Eye Comparison of Monocular Visual Outcomes Following Monofocal Extended Depth-of-Focus (EDOF) and Trifocal EDOF Intraocular Lens Implantation

To compare intraindividual monocular visual performance of a monofocal extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) and a trifocal EDOF intraocular lens (IOL) following bilateral cataract surgery. Single-center, prospective, fellow-eye comparison clinical trial. All patients received uneventful bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of the monofocal EDOF Isopure IOL in the dominant eye and the trifocal EDOF FineVision Triumf IOL in the nondominant eye. Intraindividual monocular comparison included visual acuity at various distances, defocus curves, internal total higher-order aberration (HOA), spherical aberration (SA) Z(4.0), IOL decentration, and tilt. Additionally, subjective outcomes were evaluated using Halo and Glare simulation and the Seven-Item Visual-Functioning Index questionnaire. In total, 25 patients (50 eyes) were included. Intraindividual monocular best-corrected distance visual acuity, distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity, and best-corrected near visual acuity were comparable (P > .05). However, monocular contrast acuity (P = .019), distance-corrected near visual acuity (P < .001), and defocus curves at defocus levels of 0.0 D (P = .005) and between -1.5 and -4.0 D (P < .001) differed significantly. At 5 mm, internal HOA and SA Z(4.0) were significantly different (P < .001) and comparable at 3-mm pupil diameter, as were IOL tilt and decentration (P > .05). In this combined fellow-eye comparison, near vision was significantly better with the trifocal EDOF IOL. The monofocal EDOF IOL demonstrated similar distance and intermediate visual performance as the trifocal EDOF IOL. Overall, low values of photic phenomena and visual impairment were observed.

Complications, Visual Acuity, and Refractive Error 3 Years after Secondary Intraocular Lens Implantation for Pediatric Aphakia

To report the cumulative incidence of complications and describe refractive error and visual acuity (VA) outcomes in children undergoing secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation following previous surgery for non-traumatic cataract. Pediatric cataract registry. 80 children (108 eyes: 60 bilateral, 48 unilateral) undergoing lensectomy at <13 years of age, followed by secondary IOL implantation at median age (range) of 2.7 (0.6 to 5.0) years for bilateral and 2.1 (0.5 to 6.4) for unilateral cases. Annual data collection from medical record review through 5 years following lensectomy. Cumulative incidence of newly emergent complications following secondary IOL implantation; refractive error and VA by 5 years after lensectomy. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up following secondary IOL implantation was 2.5 years (0.8 to 3.3 years). A common complication following secondary IOL implantation was a glaucoma-related adverse event (GRAE: glaucoma or glaucoma suspect); the cumulative incidence was 17% (95% CI: 3%-29%) in bilateral and 12% (95% CI: 0%-23%) in unilateral cases. The cumulative incidence of surgery for visual axis opacification was 2% (95% CI: 0%-7%) for bilateral and 4% (95% CI: 0%-10%) for unilateral cases. Median prediction error (IQR) within 90 days of implantation was 0.88 D (-0.50 D to +3.00 D) less hyperopic than intended among 21 eyes for bilateral cases and 1.50 D (-0.25 D to +2.38 D) less among 19 unilateral cases. Median (IQR) spherical equivalent refractive error at 5 years (median 5.1 years of age) in eyes receiving a secondary IOL was +0.50 D (-2.38 D to +2.94 D) for 48 bilateral and +0.06 D (-2.25 D to +0.75 D) for 22 unilateral cases. Median (IQR) monocular VA at 5 years was 20/63 (20/50-20/100) for bilateral (n=42) and 20/400 (20/160-20/800) for unilateral (n=33) cases. Eyes with secondary IOL implantation have an ongoing risk of new glaucoma-related adverse events. Five years after lensectomy (approximately 2.5 years after secondary IOL implantation), average refractive error was less hyperopic than desired given the anticipated further myopic shift before refraction stabilizes.

Visual impairment, employment status, and reduction in income: the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging

ObjectiveTo examine the employment status of those with and without visual impairment and eye disease and to examine the association between visual impairment and eye disease and a reduction in income over a 3-year period. DesignPopulation-based prospective cohort study. ParticipantsA total of 12,174 nonretired participants aged 45–64 years old in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. MethodsVisual impairment was defined if binocular presenting or pinhole-corrected monocular visual acuity in the better eye was worse than 20/40 at baseline. Self-reported diagnoses of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and glaucoma were collected. Employment status (employed, not employed due to sickness or disability, or unemployed) was based on questions on labour force participation. Income reduction was defined as household income <$50,000 per year at follow-up when household income was ≥$50,000 at baseline. Multinomial and logistic regressions were used to adjust for demographic and health variables. ResultsVisual impairment using binocular presenting visual acuity (odds ratio [OR] = 2.09; 95% CI, 1.21–3.62) and pinhole-corrected visual acuity (OR = 2.99; 95% CI, 1.54–5.83) were associated with a higher odds of not being employed due to sickness or disability after adjustment. AMD (OR = 1.82; 95% CI, 1.11–3.01) and glaucoma (OR = 2.05; 95% CI, 1.28–3.28) at baseline were both associated with reductions in income over a 3-year period after adjustment. ConclusionIndividuals with visual impairment experienced lower employment, and those with AMD or glaucoma were more likely to have their incomes decline over 3 years. Policies to improve workplace participation by those with vision loss are needed.

Clinical Outcomes of a New Hydrophobic Trifocal Intraocular Lens with Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate in Cataract Surgery: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

To investigate the clinical outcomes of new hydrophobic trifocal intraocular lens with hydroxyethyl methacrylate in the Korean population. This prospective, multicenter, and observational study evaluated the clinical outcomes of 80 eyes of 40 patients with age-related cataract underwent cataract surgery using CNWT (Clareon PanOptix). Assessment included monocular and binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (at 60cm), near visual acuity (at 40 and 33 cm), uncorrected defocus curves, questionnaires evaluating photic phenomena, spectacle independence, and spectacle free satisfaction. At postoperative 3 months, mean uncorrected binocular visual acuities were 0.04, 0.04, 0.03 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) at far, intermediate, and near distances, respectively. All patients achieved uncorrected binocular visual acuity of 0.2 logMAR or better. Monocular and binocular defocus curve indicated a mean visual acuity of 0.2 logMAR or better at the defocus range of +1.0 to - 3.0 diopters (100 to 33 cm) and +1.0 to - 3.5 diopters (100 to 28 cm). High spectacle independence was observed at all distances, with 37.5% patients reporting photic phenomena. The Clareon PanOptix intraocular lens has shown positive clinical outcomes, providing a viable option for cataract surgery. These lenses effectively address patients' visual needs, especially in intermediate and near distance tasks, reducing dependence on glasses.

Quality of vision clinical outcomes for a new fully-refractive extended depth of focus Intraocular Lens

Background/objectiveTo evaluate the visual performance of a purely refractive extended depth of focus (EDF) intraocular lens (IOL).Subjects/methodsA prospective, multi-center, randomized, subject/evaluator-masked study. Subjects were bilaterally implanted with the EDF test (Model ZEN00V, TECNIS PureSee™ IOL, N = 60) or an enhanced monofocal control (Model ICB00, TECNIS Eyhance™ IOL, N = 57) IOL. Monocular corrected distance (CDVA), intermediate (DCIVA), near acuities (DCNVA) and patient reported visual symptoms were evaluated at the 6-month visit. Monocular mesopic contrast sensitivity (CS) and depth of focus (DOF) testing were assessed at 3 months.ResultsCDVA (Mean ± SD) was −0.06 ± 0.08 for test and −0.05 ± 0.08 logMAR for control groups. DCIVA was 0.13 ± 0.08 for test and 0.18 ± 0.14 logMAR for control groups (p = 0.0127). DCNVA was 0.37 ± 0.10 for test and 0.43 ± 0.16 logMAR for control groups (p = 0.0137). Test lens was statistically superior for intermediate and near. Overall, 91.7% (halos), 95.0% (starbursts) and 95.0% (glare) of test lens patients reported that they did not experience, were not bothered, or were slightly bothered by specific visual symptoms, compared to 98.2%, 100% and 96.5% in the control group. The DOF range over which monocular visual acuity was 0.20 logMAR or better was −1.6 D for the test lens. Mesopic CS was comparable between both groups, falling within 0.11 log units for all measured cycles per degree with and without glare.ConclusionThe EDF IOL demonstrated extended range of vision and statistically superior intermediate and near performance compared to the monofocal IOL. Distance visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and dysphotopsia profile were similar to the monofocal IOL.

IJCM_421A : The Lazy-Eye-Scope: A Low-Cost Screening Tool for Early Detection of Amblyopia in Toddlers

Background: Amblyopia is the leading cause of monocular visual acuity impairment that often arises in early childhood with every 2 to 10 children in 100 being affected. Prevention of amblyopia is most effective during early childhood, as interventions become increasingly challenging once the condition progresses and the individual matures. The Lazy-Eye-Scope aims to prevent ocular morbidity in toddlers by early detection of amblyopia. Objective: To develop the The Lazy-Eye-Scope a low cost, technology enabled screening tool that aims to provide easy and affordable amblyopia detection. Methodology: An equipment will be developed to convert normal light into polarized light. It will include a plastic body containing polarising filters and a light source. This light source is directed on the eye through the refracting lens. This introduces a portable device that is extremely scalable, which will be designed for community level use. Conclusion: Thi s device is expect4ed to provide useful insight for the differently abled population including down syndrome and autism. This innovative screening tool holds promise in mitigating ocular morbidity and improving visual outcomes for toddlers worldwide. The simple methodology and usage of the device enables easy use by everyone even if they are not technically skilled.

The Freiburg Acuity Test in Preschool Children: Testability, Test-Retest Variability, and Comparison With LEA Symbols.

To determine the testability, performance, and test-retest variability (TRV) of visual acuity (VA) assessment using the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test (FrACT) compared to the LEA Symbols Test (LEA) in preschool children. In 134 preschool children aged 3.0 to 6.8years, monocular VA of each eye was measured twice with a four-orientation Landolt C version of the FrACT and once with the LEA. FrACT runs were preceded by a binocular run for explanatory purposes. Test order alternated between subjects. Optotypes were presented on a computer monitor (FrACT) or on cards (LEA) at a distance of 3 m. Overall, 68% completed the FrACT (91/134 children) and 88% completed the LEA (118/134 children). Testability depended on age: FrACT, 19% (<4years) and 87% (≥4years); LEA, 70% (<4years) and 95% (≥4years). Mean ± SD VA difference between tests was 0.11 ± 0.19 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR], with LEA reporting better acuity. The difference depended on age (0.27 ± 0.23 logMAR [<4years], 0.09 ± 0.18 logMAR [≥4years], P<0.001) and on test sequence (higher age dependence of FrACT VAs for LEA first, P<0.001). The 95% limits of agreement for the FrACT TRV were ±0.298 logMAR. The examiner-independent FrACT, using international reference Landolt C optotypes, can be used to assess VA in preschool children aged ≥4years, with reliability comparable to other pediatric VA tests. Use of the automated FrACT for VA assessment in preschool children may benefit objectivity and validity as it is a computerized test and employs the international reference Landolt C optotype.

Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after bilateral implantation of an enhanced monofocal intraocular lens: a single-masked prospective randomized study

PurposeTo evaluate and compare the visual outcomes of an enhanced monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) with two different monofocal IOLs.SettingEye Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.DesignProspective, single-center, single-masked, randomized controlled clinical study.MethodsThe study included patients undergoing phacoemulsification and IOL implantation. Patients were consecutively randomized by block randomization and assigned in a 1:1:1 allocation ratio to three study arms to bilaterally receive Tecnis Eyhance™ (model ICB00) or Tecnis® monofocal 1-piece (model PCB00) or Clareon® monofocal (model CNA0T0), respectively. Monocular and binocular (both corrected and uncorrected) visual acuities for far, intermediate and near were registered and compared among groups at 3 months. To track changes in patient quality of life, the Catquest-9SF questionnaire was administered to each patient before and after cataract extraction.ResultsNinety patients (30 for each group) were enrolled. At 3 months follow-up, statistically significant differences for intermediate visual acuities were found between the three groups. Nonstatistically significant differences were observed for distance visual acuities and the changes in Catquest-9SF scores.ConclusionTecnis Eyhance™ provided better results in intermediate visual outcomes without adverse effects on patients’ quality of life.

A comparative study of stereopsis measurements: analyzing natural conditions versus dichoptic presentation using smartphones and ultraviolet printer technology.

Accurate differentiation between stereopsis assessments in the natural and dichoptic presentation states has proven challenging with commercial stereopsis measurement tools. This study proposes a novel method to delineate these differences more precisely. We instituted two stereopsis test systems predicated on a pair of 4K smartphones and a modified Frisby Near Stereotest (FNS) version. Stereoacuity was evaluated both in the natural environment state (via the modified FNS) and the dichoptic state (via smartphones). Thirty subjects aged 20 to 28 years participated in the study with the best-corrected visual acuity (VA) of each eye no less than 0 logMAR and stereoauity of no worse than 40″. Varying degrees of monocular VA loss were induced using the fogging method, while this study does not explore conditions where the VA of both eyes is worse than 0 logMAR. When the VA difference between the two eyes did not exceed 0.2 logMAR, the modified FNS produced lower stereoacuity values compared to the 4K smartphones (Wilcoxon signed-rank test: difference = 0 logMAR, Z = -3.879, P < 0.001; difference = 0.1 logMAR, Z = -3.478, P = 0.001; difference = 0.2 logMAR, Z = -3.977, P < 0.001). Conversely, no significant differences were observed when the binocular vision difference exceeded 0.2 logMAR (difference = 0.3 logMAR, Z = -1.880, P = 0.060; difference = 0.4 logMAR, Z = -1.784, P = 0.074; difference = 0.5 logMAR, Z = -1.812, P = 0.070). The findings suggest that stereoacuity values measurements taken in the natural environment state surpass those derived from the dichoptic presentation. However, the observed difference diminishes as stereopsis decreases, corresponding to an increase in induced anisometropia.

Visual and refractive outcomes after bilateral implantation of an enhanced monofocal intraocular lens: prospective study.

To evaluate visual and refractive outcomes, as well as patient satisfaction after bilateral implantation of an enhanced monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) with emmetropia as a target refraction. San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain. Prospective, monocentric, noncomparative study. Adults 21 years or older suitable for cataract surgery and with corneal astigmatism <1.50 diopters (D) were bilaterally implanted with the RayOne EMV IOL and followed up for 3 months. Outcomes measures included refraction, monocular and binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity, distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), and defocus curve, aberrometry, and satisfaction. Visual symptoms were assessed using the CatQuest-9SF questionnaire. 50 eyes of 25 patients were included. At month 3, the mean manifest spherical equivalent was -0.39 ± 0.28 D, with all eyes within 1.00 D. Binocularly, uncorrected, at distance, 68% of patients could read ≤0.0 logMAR and 95% ≤0.2 logMAR; at intermediate 59% of patients could read ≤0.1 and 100% ≤0.2 logMAR. Mean monocular CDVA was -0.03 ± 0.06 logMAR and mean monocular DCIVA was 0.28 ± 0.07 logMAR. Binocular defocus curve demonstrated a visual acuity ≤0.2 logMAR over a 2 D range from +1.00 D to -1.25 D. Satisfaction was good in 96% of patients. Bilateral implantation of an enhanced monofocal IOL with emmetropia as a target provided excellent binocular CDVA and good DCIVA, with a high level of satisfaction.

Effect of residual sphere on uncorrected visual acuity and satisfaction in patients with monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses.

To assess the effect of residual sphere on vision and satisfaction in pseudophakic patients. Private clinics, United Kingdom. Retrospective case series. A multivariate model evaluated the effect of 1-month residual sphere on outcomes of pseudophakic patients. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to assess the relative risk of not achieving ≥20/20 monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), ≥20/50 uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), and not being satisfied with vision. ORs were assessed for residual sphere -1.00 to +1.00 diopter (D) in quarter-diopter steps, using 0.00 D as a reference. The analysis included 38 828 multifocal and 11 571 monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). The residual myopic sphere ≤-0.25 D and hyperopic sphere ≥+0.50 D had a clinically meaningful effect on UDVA. Although monofocal IOLs had an improvement in UNVA with every additional 0.25 D of myopia, the change in ORs with increasing myopia was not significant for multifocal IOLs. The mean improvement in UNVA comparing eyes with 0.00 D and -1.00 D sphere was 0.26 logMAR for monofocal and 0.03 logMAR for multifocal IOLs. Low near-addition IOLs had a slightly higher gain in UNVA with increasing myopia, but the gain was not as substantial as with monofocal IOLs. The effect of ametropia on satisfaction was more pronounced for multifocal IOLs. For every 0.25 D of residual myopia, there was >25% increase in dissatisfied patients. Although myopia improved UNVA in eyes with monofocal IOL, multifocal IOLs did not benefit from residual myopia. Multifocal IOL patients desiring distance vision should be targeted closest to emmetropia, even if it means targeting slight hyperopia.