Monoclonal Antibody VE1 Research Articles

BRAFV600E mutations and immunohistochemical expression of VE1 protein in low-grade serous neoplasms of the ovary.

The most common BRAF mutation in ovarian low-grade serous neoplasms (LGSNs) involves substitution of valine by glutamic acid at position 600 (V600E). Small studies have demonstrated high specificity of immunohistochemistry with mutation-specific monoclonal antibody VE1. We sought to investigate the expression of VE1 protein in LGSNs and its correlation with BRAF mutation-associated histological features and BRAF mutation status. We reviewed pathology reports and available slides from ovarian serous borderline tumours (SBTs) and low-grade serous carcinomas (LGSCs) diagnosed between 2000 and 2012. VE1 immunohistochemistry was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Tumours with ≥50% positive cells were considered positive. Of 121 LGSNs, there were 73 SBTs, eight SBTs with micropapillary features (mpSBT) and 40 LGSCs (22 primary, 18 metastatic). VE1 was positive in 52% (38 of 73) of SBTs and 9% (two of 22) of primary LGSCs, and in none of the mpSBTs and metastatic LGSCs (P<0.0001). Of 76 tumours with known mutation status, 42 (55%) harboured mutations, including BRAFV600E (26, 34%), KRASG12D (eight, 11%), and KRASG12V (eight, 11%). BRAFV600E mutations were present in 48% (25 of 52) of SBTs and 5% (one of 22) of LGSCs (P<0.0001). VE1 was positive in 96% (25 of 26) of BRAFV600E -mutated tumours and correlated with BRAF mutation-associated histological features (P<0.0001). BRAFV600E mutations are significantly more common in SBTs than in LGSCs. Immunohistochemical expression of VE1 protein is associated strongly with BRAFV600E mutation and BRAF mutation-associated histological features. VE1 immunohistochemistry is a reliable method for the detection of BRAFV600E mutations.

BRAF V600E mutation correlates with suppressive tumor immune microenvironment and reduced disease-free survival in Langerhans cell histiocytosis

ABSTRACTLangerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a neoplasm of myeloid origin characterized by a clonal proliferation of CD1a+/CD207+ dendritic cells. Recurrent BRAF V600E mutation has been reported in LCH. In the present report, we confirm the feasibility of the high-specificity monoclonal antibody VE1 for detecting BRAF V600E mutation in 36/97 (37.1%) retrospectively enrolled patients with LCH; concordant immunohistochemistry and Sanger sequencing results were seen in 94.8% of cases. We then assessed the tumor immune microenvironment status in LCH, and found that the GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3)+/T-bet+ ratio could distinguish between clinical multi-system/single-system (SS) multifocal and SS unifocal LCH. Notably, we found that BRAF V600E mutation is significantly correlated with increased programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PDL1) expression and forkhead box protein 3 (FOXP3)+ regulatory T cells (p < 0.001, 0.009, respectively). Moreover, Cox multivariate survival analysis showed that BRAF V600E mutation and PDL1 were independent prognostic factors of poor disease-free survival (DFS) in LCH (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–5.56, p = 0.044; HR = 3.06, 95%CI 1.14–7.14, p = 0.025, respectively), and the superiority of PDL1 in sensitivity and specificity as biomarker for DFS in LCH was demonstrated by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves when compared with BRAF V600E and risk category. Collectively, this study identifies for the first time relationship between BRAF V600E mutation and a suppressive tumor immune microenvironment in LCH, resulting in disruption of host–tumor immune surveillance, which is DFS. Our findings may provide a rationale for combining immunotherapy and BRAF-targeted therapy for treating patients with BRAF V600E mutant LCH.

Assessment of BRAF V600E Status in Colorectal Carcinoma: Tissue-Specific Discordances between Immunohistochemistry and Sequencing

Although sequencing provides the gold standard for identifying colorectal carcinoma with BRAF V600E mutation, immunohistochemistry (IHC) with the recently developed mouse monoclonal antibody VE1 for BRAF V600E protein has shown promise as a more widely available and rapid method. However, we identified anecdotal discordance between VE1 IHC and sequencing results and therefore analyzed VE1 staining by two different IHC methods (Leica Bond and Ventana BenchMark) in whole tissue sections from 480 colorectal carcinomas (323 BRAF wild-type, 142 BRAF V600E mutation, and 15 BRAF non-V600E mutation). We also compared the results with melanomas and papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTC). With the Bond method, among 142 BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal carcinomas, 77 (54%) had diffuse VE1 staining and 48 (33%) had heterogeneous staining, but 17 (12%) were negative. Among 323 BRAF wild-type colorectal carcinomas, 196 (61%) were negative, but 127 (39%) had staining, including 7 with diffuse staining. When positivity was defined as staining in ≥ 20% of tumor cells, VE1 IHC had sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 93% for BRAF V600E mutation. With the Ventana method, among 57 BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal carcinomas, 36 (63%) had diffuse VE1 staining, whereas 6 (11%) had no or weak (<20% of tumor cells) staining. Among 33 BRAF wild-type colorectal carcinomas, 16 (48%) had no or weak staining, whereas 15 (45%) had heterogeneous staining. In contrast with colorectal carcinoma, Bond and Ventana VE1 IHC in melanoma and PTC were highly concordant with sequencing results. We conclude that VE1 IHC produces suboptimal results in colorectal carcinoma and should not be used to guide patient management.

BRAFV600E protein expression in primary cutaneous malignant melanomas and paired metastases.

BRAFV600E mutations are present in approximately 50% of cutaneous malignant melanomas (CMMs). The use of BRAFV600E mutation-specific monoclonal antibody VE1 immunohistochemical analysis may facilitate rapid detection of BRAFV600E mutations in CMMs and demonstrate heterogeneity among tumors. To characterize the pattern of BRAFV600E protein expression in primary CMMs with matched metastases and to analyze the use of VE1 immunohistochemical analysis in clinical practice using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue. In this retrospective cohort study performed at Karolinska University Hospital from September 2012 to September 2013, we examined CMMs (124 primary tumors and 76 metastases) with VE1 immunohistochemical analysis, and results were compared with DNA mutation analyses. Determination of intratumoral and intertumoral heterogeneity as well as the sensitivity and specificity of VE1 immunohistochemical analysis. Positive staining results with the VE1 antibody were detected in 94 of 200 tumors (47.0%). In general, VE1 staining was homogeneous. However, VE1 staining intensity varied among the primary tumors and corresponding metastases in 63 of 135 tumors (46.7%), but a change of mutational status based on DNA analysis was found in only 4 matched tumors (3.0%). Discordant findings between DNA mutation analysis and immunohistochemical analysis were observed in 12 tumors. The overall sensitivity and specificity of VE1 immunohistochemical analysis were 96.7% and 94.5%, respectively. A comparable sensitivity was obtained for primary and metastatic CMMs. The specificity was lower among primary CMMs (92.4%) compared with metastases (98.0%). We found VE1 immunohistochemical analysis to be a useful and rapid assay for BRAFV600E mutations that may contribute to the detection of intratumoral and intertumoral heterogenetic subclones. Tumors with positive results, including strong staining, should be expedited for confirmatory BRAF mutation testing. If this test result is negative, a false-negative result of the mutation analysis should be considered. Validation of VE1 immunohistochemical analysis in clinical practice is needed.

Immunohistochemical detection of the BRAF V600E mutation in melanoma patients with monoclonal antibody VE1.

A novel mutation-specific monoclonal antibody VE1 was generated to detect BRAF V600E mutation with immunohistochemistry. This study aims to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemistry compared with conventional Sanger sequencing and to evaluate whether IHC would become the routine screening method of BRAF V600E mutation. A total of 84 cases of melanoma lesion specimens were selected to make the tissue microarray and to perform IHC with VE1 antibody. Simultaneously Sanger sequencing was applied to test and verify. VE1 has a high specificity (100%) and sensitivity (72.2%), and the concordance between the two techniques is excellent (93.8% cases coherent and kappa = 0.801). As a rapid, cost-effective method, IHC may become the routine diagnostic means for the detection of BRAF V600E mutation of malignant melanomas in the near future, and the recommended detection process is initial immunohistochemical staining for positive cases, followed by molecular techniques for negative or ambiguous cases.

Immunohistochemistry using the BRAF V600E mutation‐specific monoclonal antibody VE1 is not a useful surrogate for genotyping in colorectal adenocarcinoma

The presence of a BRAF mutation is a strong marker for poor prognosis of colorectal carcinoma (CRC), and can be used as evidence of a sporadic mechanism of mismatch repair deficiency. BRAF mutation may also predict resistance to EGFR-targeted therapy. A BRAF V600E-specific antibody has recently become commercially available. The aim of this study was to determine whether immunohistochemistry can predict BRAF mutations in CRC. Immunohistochemistry was performed on 52 genotyped CRC cases (17 BRAF mutant, 18 KRAS mutant, 17 BRAF/KRAS wild-type) with monoclonal antibody VE1. Cytoplasmic staining was observed in 71% of BRAF V600E mutant tumours (moderate or strong staining in 50% of these cases). Weak cytoplasmic staining was observed in 17% of KRAS mutant tumours and 35% of wild-type tumours. Non-specific nuclear staining was common. The sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemistry with VE1 for BRAF mutation were 71% and 74%, respectively; when only moderate or strong staining was considered to be positive, the specificity was 100%, but the sensitivity only 35%. Immunohistochemistry with VE1 is not a useful surrogate for genotyping in CRC. Although moderate or strong cytoplasmic staining is specific for BRAF V600E mutations, this antibody is insufficiently sensitive to serve as an effective screening tool.

Expression of BRAF V600E Mutant Protein in Epithelial Ovarian Tumors

Genetic analyses have identified BRAF V600E mutations in a subset of ovarian carcinomas. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of BRAF V600E aberrant protein using a novel mutation-specific antibody in epithelial ovarian tumors. We immunohistochemically analyzed expression of V600E-mutant BRAF protein in archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens of 142 epithelial ovarian tumors [98 invasive carcinomas and 44 tumors of low malignant potential (LMP)] using monoclonal antibody VE1. BRAF mutation status was validated in all immunopositive cases and in 6 immunonegative control cases by gene sequencing. We found anti-BRAF V600E immunolabeling in 4 serous carcinomas and 5 serous LMP. Presence of a BRAF V600E mutation was confirmed by sequencing analysis in 6 of the 9 cases (3 LMP tumors, 3 low-grade carcinomas). In 2 partially VE1-positive tumors deriving from 1 patient (1 LMP and 1 contralateral invasive high-grade serous carcinoma), genetic analysis repeatedly resulted in BRAF wild-type, arguing for false-positive immunostaining results. One immunopositive case was repeatedly inconclusive in genetic analysis. In all 6 genetically confirmed cases, BRAF V600E mutant protein expression was homogenous throughout the tumor tissue. We found BRAF V600E mutations in 13% (4/31) of serous LMP and 5% (3/62) of invasive serous carcinomas. No BRAF V600E mutations were detected in nonserous epithelial ovarian tumors. For reliable assessment of the BRAF V600E status in ovarian epithelial tumor samples, an integrated approach using immunohistochemistry and genetic analysis seems advisable, as both methods lead to incorrect results in some cases.

Combined BRAFV600E-positive Melanocytic Lesions With Large Epithelioid Cells Lacking BAP1 Expression and Conventional Nevomelanocytes

Recently a group of spitzoid melanocytic proliferations with loss of BAP1 expression has been reported. The lesions may occur sporadically or as part of a familial cancer syndrome. They have distinct histopathologic features characterized by a nevus-like silhouette and cytologic composition of large epithelioid melanocytes with oval vesicular nuclei, distinct nucleoli, and abundant cytoplasm with well-defined cytoplasmic borders. A characteristic immunohistochemical finding is loss of nuclear labeling for BAP1. In contrast to classic Spitz nevi, the lesions carry the BRAF mutation. They may present as a pure large epithelioid cell proliferation or as a combined lesion in association with a conventional nevus. Here we report a series of 8 combined melanocytic lesions, in which a dominant large epithelioid cell proliferation with loss of BAP1 expression was associated and intimately admixed with a BAP1-positive conventional nevus. These biphenotypic lesions were from 6 patients, 3 female and 3 male, ranging in age from 16 to 59 years. Immunohistochemical analysis for BAP1 showed loss of nuclear labeling confined to the large epithelioid melanocyte subpopulation. The conventional melanocytes retained BAP1 expression. Both large epithelioid and conventional melanocytes were immunoreactive with the monoclonal antibody VE1, which recognizes the protein encoded by mutant BRAF. In 6 cases the conventional nevus component was a compound nevus of small "type B" melanocytes. In 2 cases, the nevus remnant was entirely intradermal. The lesions described herein may represent a peculiar combined melanocytic nevus variant. However, longer follow-up and more studies are needed to determine the biological potential of the BAP1-negative melanocyte proliferations.