s of the 12th ISIIH 2325 doses up to 100 mg per day with second drug therapy of azathioprine or alternatively cyclophosphamide. After the transfer to our hospital a plethora of laboratory studies for rheumatologic, inflammatory, and infectious processes where obtained and except for a very modest decrease in C4 all where normal. A further contrast enhanced MRT of the brain showed extensive rightsided white matter disease with significant extension into the left hemisphere. An HIV ELISA, a CD4 count, and a JC virus PCR were obtained.The ELISA was negative; but the CD4 count was 52 and JCV-VL was 2888 copies/ml (normal ~80). An exhaustive literature search revealed minimal therapeutic options for the JC virus infection, and the patient was discharge to hospice in the care of her physician on a suggested regimen of a prednisone taper, and hopefully therapeutic alphainterferon and cidofovir treatment. As of February 2002 the patient remains bed bound. This devastating case of JC virus infection illustrates the confounding diagnostic dilemmas frequently encountered by practitioners. In this instance a consistent explanation is found with the realization that the patient probably suffers from advanced iatrogenic immunosuppression and the resultant possible opportunistic infections. Valacyclovir for the prevention of CMV disease after renal transplantation: A 5year follow-up *Hans-H. Neumayer, Jean-Paul Squifflet, David Lowance, Christophe M. Legendre *Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Charit&, Berlin, Germany Objective: Valacyclovir 2g four times daily for 90 days has been shown (Lowance et al., NEJM 1999: 340:146270) to reduce the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease and acute graft rejection (GR) at six months vs placebo after renal transplantation. Among the CMV seropositive patients (R+) the incidence of CMV disease was reduced from 6% to 1% and there was a reduction in biopsy confirmed acute GR from 36% to 30%. CMV disease was significantly reduced in the donor-positive recipient-negative (D+R-) group from 45% to 16% and rate of biopsy confirmed acute GR from 52% to 26% compared to placebo. This retrospective review of patients’ medical notes was designed to assess whether the benefits extend to increased graft function and survival during 5 years follow-up. Methods: Data were available for 449 of the 616 patients enrolled in the original study, P66/H73-012. The primary population for analysis was the ITT population of all patients randomised in the original study. The primary endpoint was time to allograft failure up to 5 years posttransplant. Rates of acute GR, chronic GR, CMV disease and survival were secondary endpoints. Results: No significant treatment difference was observed for time to allograft failure in either the R+ or D+Rpatients although the benefits in preventing CMV disease and acute GR are still evident at 5 years.