Mofetil In Patients Research Articles

The Importance of Patient-Focused Drug Development in Pemphigus and Pemphigoid

The Importance of Patient-Focused Drug Development in Pemphigus and Pemphigoid

LESIONS OF THE HEMATOPOIETIC SYSTEM IN A PATIENT WITH SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS AND THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TREATMENT WITH MYCOPHENOLATE MOFETIL

The article presents a clinical case of the use of mycophenolate mofetil in a patient with high activity of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and suppression of hematopoietic systems. The patient had all the characteristic signs of a severe course of SLE with the development of a complication - severe anemia (frequent exacerbations of the main disease, a significant and constant decrease in the number of erythrocytes and the level of hemoglobin in the general blood test against the background of glucocorticosteroid therapy, the severity of clinical symptoms). Damage to the hematopoietic system is characteristic of such patients and prevailed in the clinical picture of the disease and became the direct reason for seeking medical help. The appointment of mycophenolate mofetil made it possible to reduce the activity of manifestations of the main disease, reduce the development of possible complications, and in the future achieve clinical and laboratory remission. The clinical feature of this case is the effective use of mycophenolate mofetil in a patient with high activity of the course of SLE and the constant occurrence of a severe complication - severe anemia, against the background of glucocorticoid therapy. Damage to the hematopoietic system in the patient prevailed in the clinical picture of the disease and became the direct reason for seeking medical help. According to the literature, the use of mycophenolate mofetil in patients gives a positive clinical result in the treatment of such patients: reducing the activity of the course of the main disease, preventing complications, extending the period of clinical and laboratory remission. This approach will improve the quality of life of patients with this group of diseases with the additional advantage of reducing the burden on health care due to the reduction in the frequency of hospitalizations of patients with severe SLE.

Adherence with mycophenolate mofetil in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases in coventry: Signs of progress but challenges remain.

The study investigated adherence with MMF treatment among patients attending rheumatology clinics at University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust (UHCW) with Autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRDs). This retrospective study collated hospital pharmacy data in patients who requested the prescription for MMF between January 2015 and December 2018. Clinical data were obtained from paper and electronic notes. Data were analysed using Microsoft Excel. Ethical approval was obtained through Coventry University. We recruited 144 patients into this study with age range from 18 to 91years, including 100 females and 44 males. There were 112 White patients, 22 of South Asian origin, 3 East Asian and 4 black patients. SLE (56), scleroderma (18), mixed connective tissue disease (15), myositis (13), vasculitis (13) were the commonest diagnoses. Overall adherence with Mycophenolate mofetil was 62%. The adherence rates were below 80% for all age groups with ∼60% of patients having adherence levels of >60%. Poor adherence with MMF correlated with 3-fold increase in risk of flares compared to good adherence (p=0.002). We also found a significant difference between Asian patients (mean adherence 47%) and White patients (mean adherence 65%, p<0.001). Adherence with MMF has improved considerably compared to historical studies, although these remain suboptimal. Certain population groups such as young adults, elderly and Asian patients continue to have lower adherence and higher risk of flares. Strategies are needed to improve adherence levels overall and specifically in the high-risk groups to reduce risk of flares and organ damage.

Population pharmacokinetics and Bayesian estimation of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with autoimmune hepatitis.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is the most widely used second-line agent in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Individual dose adjustment of MMF may avoid adverse outcomes while maximizing efficacy. The aim of the present study was to develop population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models and maximum a posteriori Bayesian estimators (MAP-BEs) to estimate mycophenolic acid interdose area under the curve in AIH patients administered MMF using nonlinear mixed effect modelling. We analysed 50 mycophenolic acid PK profiles from 34 different patients, together with some demographic, clinical, and laboratory test data. The median number of plasma samples per profile, immediately preceding and following the morning MMF dose, was 7. PopPK modelling was performed using parametric, top-down, nonlinear mixed effect modelling with NONMEM 7.3. MAP-BEs were developed based on the best popPK model and the best limited sampling strategy selected among several. The pharmacokinetic data were best described by a 2-compartment model, Erlang distribution to describe the absorption phase, and a proportional error. The mean (relative standard error) of popPK parameter estimates of clearance, intercompartmental clearance, central volume and absorption rate with the final model were: 21.6L h-1 (11%), 22.7L h-1 (19%), 35.9L (21%) and 8.7h-1 (9%), respectively. The peripheral volume was fixed to 300 L. The best MAP-BE relied on the limited sampling strategy at 0.33, 1 and 3hours after MMF dose administration and was very accurate (bias =5.6%) and precise (root mean squared prediction error <20%). The precise and accurate Bayesian estimator developed in this study for AIH patients on MMF can be used to improve the therapeutic management of these patients.

Dose-Dependent Impairment of the Immune Response to the Moderna-1273 mRNA Vaccine by Mycophenolate Mofetil in Patients with Rheumatic and Autoimmune Liver Diseases.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Moderna-1273 mRNA vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 in patients with immune-mediated diseases under different treatments. Anti-trimeric spike protein antibodies were tested in 287 patients with rheumatic or autoimmune diseases (10% receiving mycophenolate mofetil, 15% low-dose glucocorticoids, 21% methotrexate, and 58% biologic/targeted synthetic drugs) at baseline and in 219 (76%) 4 weeks after the second Moderna-1273 mRNA vaccine dose. Family members or caretakers were enrolled as the controls. The neutralizing serum activity against SARS-CoV-2-G614, alpha, and beta variants in vitro and the cytotoxic T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 peptides were determined in a subgroup of patients and controls. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody development, i.e., seroconversion, was observed in 69% of the mycophenolate-treated patients compared to 100% of both the patients taking other treatments and the controls (p < 0.0001). A dose-dependent impairment of the humoral response was observed in the mycophenolate-treated patients. A daily dose of >1 g at vaccination was a significant risk factor for non-seroconversion (ROC AUC 0.89, 95% CI 0.80–98, p < 0.0001). Moreover, in the seroconverted patients, a daily dose of >1 g of mycophenolate was associated with significantly lower anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers, showing slightly reduced neutralizing serum activity but a comparable cytotoxic response compared to other immunosuppressants. In non-seroconverted patients treated with mycophenolate at a daily dose of >1 g, the cytotoxic activity elicited by viral peptides was also impaired. Mycophenolate treatment affects the Moderna-1273 mRNA vaccine immunogenicity in a dose-dependent manner, independent of rheumatological disease.

Use of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with pediatric and adult primary nephrotic syndrome: information from a Japanese hospital claims database

BackgroundCurrent treatment for frequently relapsing, steroid-dependent, or steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome focuses on immunosuppressive therapies. Although the clinical guideline suggests the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), limited information is available on patients with primary nephrotic syndrome who receive off-label treatment with MMF in Japan.MethodThe dose, treatment duration, previous treatment, and characteristics of primary nephrotic syndrome patients receiving MMF were investigated using data from a Japanese hospital claims database (April 2008–September 2021).ResultsData on 424 primary nephrotic syndrome patients receiving MMF (146 patients < 18 years old; 278 patients ≥ 18 years old) were captured. The most common initial daily doses of MMF capsules (% of patients < 18 and ≥ 18 years old) were 1000 mg (31.9%, 36.8%), 1500 mg (16.0%, 23.8%), and 500 mg (23.6%, 17.3%), and the most common maximum daily doses were 1000 mg (43.8%, 32.9%), 1500 mg (23.6%, 28.9%), and 2000 mg (6.3%, 16.2%). Most patients (97.9%, 99.3%) were treated with a daily dose of 2000 mg or less. Among patients < 18 years old, the younger the patient, the lower the dose. MMF was used for more than 1 year in 30.8% of patients < 18 years old and in 28.8% of patients ≥ 18 years old.ConclusionsOur study suggested that off-label use of MMF for primary nephrotic syndrome has increased since 2012 in Japan. The dose of MMF used in patients with primary nephrotic syndrome was generally within the approved dose range for lupus nephritis and transplant-related diseases in Japan.

Oral mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of acquired dermal macular hyperpigmentation: An open-label pilot study.

Literature on treating acquired dermal macular hyperpigmentation is sparse. To assess treatment response of mycophenolate mofetil in patients having acquired dermal macular hyperpigmentation. In this open-label, pilot study, patients of acquired dermal macular hyperpigmentation affecting at least the face and/or neck were included. Each participant was treated with mycophenolate mofetil 2g/day for 24weeks, with a follow-up of 12weeks. Two aspects of disease severity were measured: activity (appearance of new lesions/extension of existing lesions), and degree of hyperpigmentation (measured using 'dermal pigmentation area and severity index'). Patient satisfaction was assessed on a scale of 0-10. Forty-three of 46 patients who were prescribed mycophenolate, completed the study (40 females, 6 males; mean disease duration 2.8±1.4years). Amongst 20 (43.5%) patients with active disease, stability was achieved in 17, after a mean duration of 6.1±2.5weeks (range 4-12weeks; median 4; IQR 4weeks). Mean dermal pigmentation area and severity index at baseline was 18.8±7.1 and decreased to 13.7±6.3 at 24th week (27.5±14.7%; P<0.001). A significant decreasing trend in dermal pigmentation area and severity index (P<0.001) was observed, and first significant difference from baseline was noted at the 16th week (P 0.008). Less than 10%, >10-20%, >20%-30%, >30%-40%, >40%-50%, and >50% reduction in dermal pigmentation area and severity index was observed in 8, 5, 4, 15, 10 and 1 patients/patient respectively. The maximum mean grade of pre-treatment dermatoscopic severity was 3±0.7, and decreased to 2.1±0.8 on the face (P<0.001) and 2.4±0.7 on the neck (P<0.001) post-treatment. There were 9 (20.1%) non-responders. Self-assessment scores of the rest of the patients fell in the range of moderate/fair improvement (>5 to 7). No significant correlation was seen between patient satisfaction score and degree of reduction in dermal pigmentation area and severity index (r -0.39). Three developed adverse effects (leucopenia, n=1; transaminitis and hyperbilirubinemia, n=2) that resolved following discontinuation of mycophenolate. Mycophenolate mofetil appears to be a promising treatment option in acquired dermal macular hyperpigmentation.

Second-line therapy with mycophenolate mofetil in patients with autoimmune hepatitis who were intolerant or failed to respond to standard treatment

Although standard treatment for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) comprises prednisolone (PSL) and azathioprine (AZA), some patients are intolerant to or do not respond to PSL and/or AZA. The clinical practice guidelines of AIH in Europe and North America recommend mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as second-line treatment in these patients. We administered MMF as second-line therapy to 7 patients with AIH (male/female 1/6, age range 27-79 years) who were intolerant to or failed to respond to standard treatment. At the commencement of MMF, the median ALT value was 84U/L (28-254U/L), and the PSL dose was 15.0mg/day (0-45mg/day). In terms of adverse effects of PSL, diabetes mellitus was observed in 4 patients (insulin injection in 2) and femoral head necrolysis in 2. Adverse effects of AZA were present in 2, and 5 patients were not treated with AZA. At 24 weeks of MMF treatment, the median ALT and daily PSL dose were decreased to 16U/L (6-41U/L) and 7.0mg, respectively. Blood sugar control improved, and insulin injection was discontinued in both the patients. While intractable diarrhea developed in 1 patient with cirrhosis, no adverse effect was observed in other 6 patients. In conclusion, MMF appeared effective and safe in at least non-cirrhotic patients with AIH who were intolerant or failed to respond to standard treatment with PSL and AZA in Japanese clinical practice.

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of rituximab in combination with mycophenolate mofetil in patients with nonspecific interstitial pneumonia non-responding to a first-line immunosuppressive treatment (EVER-ILD): A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial

IntroductionNonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) are rare but severe diseases, with high mortality and morbidity, with no effective pharmacological treatment allowing for long-term remission, and therefore no clear therapeutic recommendations. Classic immunosuppressants are used as first-line treatment, with only one third of patients being responders and no clear recommendations exist for the choice of the second-line therapy. The EvER-ILD study is the first one to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus placebo and MMF in a broad range of NSIP patients that did not respond to a first-line therapy. A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis based on rituximab serum concentrations will allow identification of potential factors associated with therapeutic response and/or adverse effects. MethodsEvER-ILD study is a French multicenter, prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, superiority trial. Patients with severe and progressive NSIP non-responding to a first line immunosuppressive treatment will be randomized in 2 groups of treatment: one course of rituximab plus 6 months MMF (RTX-MMF group) and one course of placebo plus 6 months MMF (Placebo-MMF group). The primary outcome is the change in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC, % of predicted) from baseline to 6 months. Several clinical, biological, and quality of life secondary outcomes will be measured at 3, 6 and 12 months. A sample size of 122 patients (61 patients per group) would allow to show a point difference between groups in the change of FVC at 6 months, based on a common standard deviation for FVC change of 8% with a power of 90%, alpha 5% two-sided, and anticipating an extreme 10% drop-out rate. Ethics and disseminationThe protocol was approved by the French Research Ethics Committee (CPP Tours Ouest 1 2016-R28) on November 10, 2016, and by the French competent authority (ANSM, reference 160771A-22) on December 1st, 2016. This article refers to protocol V2, dated November 18, 2016. An independent data safety monitoring board will review safety and tolerability data for the duration of the trial. Results will be disseminated via peer reviewed publication and presentation at international conferences. Trial registration numberNCT02990286 (clinicaltrials.gov), EudraCT 2016-003026-16 (European Medicines agency).

Phase II, multi-center, open-label, single-arm clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of Mycophenolate Mofetil in patients with high-grade locally advanced or metastatic osteosarcoma (ESMMO): rationale and design of the ESMMO trial

BackgroundClinical outcomes of patients with osteosarcoma remain unsatisfactory, with little improvement in a 5-year overall survival over the past three decades. There is a substantial need for further research and development to identify and develop more efficacious agents/regimens in order to improve clinical outcomes of patients for whom the prognosis is unfavorable. Recently, mycophenolate mofetil, a prodrug of mycophenolic acid, has been found to have anticancer activity against osteosarcoma in both in vitro and animal experiments, so that further investigation in humans is warranted.MethodsA total of 27 patients with high-grade locally advanced or metastatic osteosarcoma will be enrolled into this phase II, multi-center, open-label, single-arm, two-stage clinical trial. The main objectives of this study are to determine the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in the patients. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival at 16 weeks; the secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, overall survival, overall response rate, safety parameters, pharmacokinetic parameters, biomarkers, pain score, and quality of life. Mycophenolate mofetil at the initial dose of 5 g/day or lower will be administered for 4 cycles (28 days/cycle) or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The dose of mycophenolate mofetil may be reduced by 1–2 g/day or withheld for some Grade 3 or Grade 4 toxicities whenever clinically needed. The duration of study participation is approximately 4–5 months, with a minimum of 12 study visits. If mycophenolate mofetil proves beneficial to some patients, as evidenced by stable disease or partial response at 16 weeks, administration of mycophenolate mofetil will continue in the extension period.DiscussionThis trial is the first step in the translation of therapeutic potential of mycophenolate mofetil emerging from in vitro and animal studies into the clinical domain. It is designed to assess the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with high-grade locally advanced or metastatic osteosarcoma. The results will provide important information about whether or not mycophenolate mofetil is worth further development.Trial registrationThis trial was prospectively registered on Thai Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: TCTR20190701001). The posted information will be updated as needed to reflect protocol amendments and study progress.

Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with virus-negative lymphocytic myocarditis: A prospective cohort study

Backgroundvirus-negative lymphocytic myocarditis (VNLM) is a severe inflammatory heart disease with elusive therapies. We aimed to assess the efficacy of mycophenolate-mofetil (MMF) in patients with VNLM.Methods: patients were enrolled in this prospective cohort study and were treated with MMF, as the initial treatment in case of concomitant systemic immune diseases (SIDs), or as rescue therapy in isolated myocarditis intolerant/resistant to azathioprine. All were initially evaluated for endomyocardial biopsy; ECG, 24-h Holter, echocardiography, troponin T and NT-proBNP were obtained in all patients at baseline and after 6 months. The primary end-point was the change in left-ventricular ejection-fraction (LVEF) on echocardiogram after 6 months. Secondary outcomes: decrease in serum NT-proBNP and troponin-T levels, reduction of LV end-diastolic-volume (LVEDV), amelioration of regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA), and modification of clinical status. Results20 patients (10 females, median age at diagnosis 32 [41–59] years) were enrolled. Baseline echocardiography revealed a reduced LVEF (<55%) in 11 patients (55%) and a median LV-EF of 53.5 [44–60.5]%. Baseline median troponin T and NT-proBNP were 50.5 (14.4–288.5)ng/L and 257.0 (90.5–912.0)pg/ml, respectively. After 6 months, the median LVEF significantly improved (57 [50–61]%,p = 0.016), irrespective of concomitant steroid dose. Consistently, after 6 months LVEDV decreased from 135 ± 50 ml to 114 ± 38 ml (p < 0.001), and only 6 patients had RWMA, compared to 14 at baseline (p = 0.016). The amelioration of cardiac function was paralleled by a reduction of median troponin T (12.0 [10.0–24.0],p = 0.02) and NT-proBNP(79.5 [74.5-223-2],p = 0.007) and by a reduction in the number of patients with dyspnea NYHA class II-III(p = 0.02). None of the patients required drug discontinuation. ConclusionsMMF migh be a safe and effective therapeutic option in VNLM, both as first-line agent and as a rescue therapy.

Suppression of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Mycophenolic Acid in Experimental Models and in Patients.

Tumor recurrence is a major complication following liver transplantation (LT) as treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Immunosuppression is an important risk factor for HCC recurrence, but conceivably may depend on the type of immunosuppressive medication. Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is a currently widely used immunosuppressant. This study investigated the effects of MPA on HCC. Three human HCC cell lines and organoids from mouse primary liver tumor were used as experimental models. MTT, Alamar Blue assay, cell cycle analysis, colony formation, and [3H]-thymidine assays were performed. An LT database was used for retrospective analysis of the effect of mycophenolate mofetil, the prodrug of MPA, on HCC recurrence. With clinically achievable concentrations, MPA effectively inhibited HCC cell proliferation and single-cell colony-forming unit. In short-term experiments, MPA effectively elicited S phase arrest in HCC cell lines. In addition, the initiation and growth of liver tumor organoids were effectively inhibited by MPA. Most importantly, the use of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with HCC-related LT was significantly associated with less tumor recurrence and improved patient survival. MPA can specifically counteract HCC growth in vitro and tumor recurrence in LT patients. These results warrant prospective clinical trials into the role of MPA-mediated immunosuppression following LT of patients with HCC.

A study on the safety and tolerability of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with connective tissue disease

Background: Connective tissue disorders (CTD) are mostly due to inflammatory and fibrotic tissue injury. Glucocorticoids and immunomodulators though useful but are toxic. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is now being used successfully in many autoimmune diseases, but the safety of MMF in CTD patients is yet to be conclusively established.Methods: The study was a retrospective record based observational one in patients of CTD satisfying the predetermined inclusion criteria. Various safety parameters were noted down from the observed records and analysed accordingly.Results: The 120 case records of CTD patients were analysed for a specific set of safety parameters over the preceding one year. Diarrhoeal attacks were the most commonly encountered side effect (38.3%) of long term patients who were on mycophenolate therapy followed by infection.Conclusions: Mycophenolate was found to be generally well tolerated in CTD patients with few reports of adverse events, but larger clinical trials are needed to conclusively establish its safety.

Mycophenolate mofetil in patients with refractory systemic autoimmune myopathies: case series

BackgroundCurrently, there are only few studies (mostly case reports or case series) on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in patients with systemic autoimmune myopathies (SAM). Therefore, the goal of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MMF (monotherapy or coadjuvant drug) in a specific sample of patients with refractory SAM: dermatomyositis, polymyositis, anti-synthetase syndrome or clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis.MethodsA case series including 20 consecutive adult patients with refractory SAM from 2010 to 2016 was conducted. After the introduction of MMF, associated or not with other drugs, the patients were followed for 6 consecutive months.ResultsIn 17 out of 20 patients MMF was introduced without any intolerance. The clinical symptoms evaluated in these patients were muscular, cutaneous and/or pulmonary activity. During the 6-month follow-up, 11 out of 17 patients had clinical and laboratory activities response with MMF, allowing significant tapering of the prednisone median dose (15 vs. 5 mg/day, P=0.005). On the other hand, in three out of 20 patients; MMF was discontinued in less than two months, because of gastrointestinal intolerance. There were no cases of serious infection or death.ConclusionsMMF was relatively well-tolerated, safe and effective in patients with refractory SAM. Further studies are needed to confirm the data found.

Efficacy and Safety of Mycophenolate Mofetil in Patients With Autoimmune Hepatitis and Suboptimal Outcomes After Standard Therapy

Little is known about outcomes of patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) who have a suboptimal outcome to standard therapy and are then given mycophenolate mofetil as rescue therapy. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in patients failed by or intolerant to corticosteroids, with or without azathioprine. We performed a retrospective study of 105 patients with AIH who received mycophenolate mofetil therapy after an inadequate response or intolerance to standard therapy (98% received combination therapy with corticosteroids plus thiopurines). Patients were recruited from 17 liver clinics via the Australian Liver Association Clinical Research Network. We reviewed records for baseline demographic features and characteristics of liver disease, initial therapy, mycophenolate mofetil indications, treatment outcome, and side effects. The primary outcome was biochemical remission, defined as levels of alanine and aspartate transferase and IgG level within the normal reference range, with or without normal liver histology within the first 2 years of treatment. The indication for mycophenolate mofetil therapy was non-response to treatment for 40% of cases and intolerance to therapy for 60%. Overall, 63 patients (60%) achieved biochemical remission following a median 12 weeks treatment with mycophenolate mofetil. The proportion of patients who achieved biochemical remission was similar between patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil for non-response to standard therapy (57%) and patients with intolerance to standard therapy (62%). However, a lower proportion of patients with cirrhosis achieved biochemical remission (47%) than patients without cirrhosis (6%) (P = .07). Serious adverse events occurred in 3 patients (2.7%) including 1 death, and 10 patients (9.2%) discontinued mycophenolate mofetil because of adverse events. In this retrospective study of patients with AIH who received mycophenolate mofetil as a rescue therapy, we found the drug to be well tolerated and moderately effective, inducing biochemical remission in 60% of subjects. Rates of response are lower and rates of infection are higher in patients with AIH and cirrhosis. Prospective studies of mycophenolate mofetil are warranted for this population.

Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with IgA nephropathy: an update meta-analysis

BackgroundThe application of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in treating patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) remains uncertain. This update meta-analysis was performed to re-evaluate the therapeutic potential of MMF in IgAN.MethodsArticles were obtained by searching the electronic databases without language restriction. Randomized controlled trials studying the role of MMF in treating IgAN were collected. The quality of included studies was critically evaluated. Data analyses were performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 297 articles were screened and eight articles were finally included. Among the eight randomized controlled trials, five and three were high quality and low quality, respectively. Both fixed-effect and random-effect model were used. Pooled results by combining all the eight studies suggested that IgAN patients in MMF group had a higher remission rate than that in control group. Compared to placebo or corticosteroid monotherapy, MMF monotherapy exerted a higher remission rate and side effect rate in both main analysis and subgroup analysis by human race. Compared to corticosteroid plus other immunosuppressive agent therapy, corticosteroid plus MMF therapy had a higher remission rate, lower serum creatinine doubling rate, progression to end-stage renal disease rate and side effects rate. Subgroup analysis by therapeutic regimen further confirmed these results between corticosteroid plus MMF therapy and corticosteroid plus cyclophosphamide therapy. Funnel-plot displayed a symmetrical figure, indicating no publication bias existed.ConclusionsMMF has the potential in treatment of IgAN, especially for Asians. The evidence currently available shows that MMF monotherapy has a more efficacy but higher side effects when compared to placebo or corticosteroid monotherapy in treatment of Asians with IgAN. While MMF combined with corticosteroid regimen has a more efficacy and lower side effects when compared with corticosteroid plus cyclophosphamide regimen.

Mycophenolate mofetil is a valid option in patients with inflammatory bowel disease resistant to TNF-α inhibitors and conventional immunosuppressants

BackgroundFew studies investigated the role of mycophenolate mofetil in inflammatory bowel disease, and none of them had specifically focused on patients with previous multiple intolerances and/or nonresponses to conventional immunosuppressants and biologics. AimsTo evaluate clinical benefit and tolerability profile of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and limited treatment options. MethodsAll consecutive patients with previous multiple intolerances and/or nonresponses to immunosuppressants and biologics who started an off-label treatment with mycophenolate mofetil from January 2014 to February 2016 were entered in a prospectively maintained database. ResultsTwenty-four patients were included. Four weeks after initiation of mycophenolate mofetil therapy, a steroid-free remission was achieved in 4 patients (16.7%), while a clinical response in 13 (54.1%). At the end of follow-up, 12 patients (50.0%) remained on mycophenolate mofetil. Six achieved and maintained steroid-free remission throughout the study period (25.0%), and a further 6 patients (25.0%) achieved a clinical response with complete discontinuation of steroids. Twelve patients (50.0%) were considered as treatment failure, and five of them underwent surgery. ConclusionsThis is the first experience reporting a clinical benefit and tolerability of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and multiple previous failures to other immunosuppressants and/or biologics.

Pre-dose plasma concentration monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil in patients with autoimmune diseases.

To date, neither the benefit of mycophenolic acid (MPA) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), the prodrug of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), nor the optimal monitoring technique have been established in autoimmune diseases. This study was undertaken to confirm, in a cohort of new patients, the plasma MPA thresholds previously published in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or vasculitis. MPA areas under the concentration-time curves between 0 and 12 h, 12 h trough concentrations and pre-dose concentrations (C0 ) were determined for 23 patients with SLE and 21 with systemic vasculitis. The relationship between patients' pharmacokinetic (PK) variables and their clinical outcomes during follow-up were analyzed. In both autoimmune diseases, at PK assessment, median MPA C0 for patients with uncontrolled disease was significantly lower than that of patients with stable disease or in remission, 1.6 mg l(-1) (IQR 0.9-2.1 mg l(-1)) vs. 2.95 mg l(-1) (IQR 1.38-3.73 mg l(-1)) for SLE (P = 0.048) and 1.55 mg l(-1) (IQR 0.98-2.18 mg l(-1)) vs. 3 mg l(-1) (IQR 2.2-4.4 mg l(-1)) for vasculitis (P = 0.016). According to our receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, a C0 threshold of 2.5-3 mg l(-1) was best able to discriminate a flare (SLE: 88% sensitivity, 80% specificity; vasculitis: 100% sensitivity, 90% specificity). Patients with C0 ≥ 2.5-3 mg l(-1) at inclusion had better clinical outcomes during the 12 months following PK assessment. Provided that the benefit of TDM in patients with autoimmune diseases could be confirmed by randomized, controlled trials, it might be based on the C0 measured approximately 12 h post-dose.

Two-year experience with mycophenolate mofetil in patients with scleroderma lung disease: a case series.

To assess the effect of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on pulmonary functions in patients with systemic sclerosis-associated lung disease (SSc-ILD) who experienced an inadequate response to first line cyclophosphamide (CYC) therapy. Twelve consecutive SSc-ILD patients who received MMF due to inadequate response to CYC as a first line agent, were retrospectively reviewed. Over the course of 2 years, pulmonary function tests (PFT) and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scans were performed. Following initial baseline tests, PFTs were continued at a frequency of every 6 months and HRCT scans were performed every 12 months. After MMF treatment, values of forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) improved in three (25%) and two (16.6%) patients, respectively. It is also noted that the evaluation of serial HCRT scans showed no change in 54.5% of patients. Our case series suggested that PFT and imaging scores seemed to be stabilized by MMF in SSc-ILD patients who were inadequate responders to CYC.

Mycophenolate mofetil in patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: a prospective pharmacokinetics and clinical study

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV) treatment strategy is based on immunosuppressive agents. Little information is available concerning mycophenolic acid (MPA) and the area under the curve (AUC) in patients treated for AAV. We evaluated the variations in pharmacokinetics for MPA in patients with AAV and the relationship between MPA-AUC and markers of the disease. MPA blood concentrations were measured through the enzyme-multiplied immunotechnique (C(0), C(30), C(1), C(2), C(3), C(4), C(6) and C(9)) to determine the AUC. Eighteen patients were included in the study. The median (range) MPA AUC(0-12) was 50·55 (30·9-105·4) mg/h/l. The highest coefficient of determination between MPA AUC and single concentrations was observed with C(3) (P < 0·0001) and C(2) (P < 0·0001) and with C(4) (P < 0·0005) or C(0) (P < 0·001). Using linear regression, the best estimation of MPA AUC was provided by a model including C(30), C(2) and C(4): AUC = 8·5 + 0·77 C(30) + 4·0 C(2) + 1·7 C(4) (P < 0·0001). Moreover, there was a significant relationship between MPA AUC(0-12) and lymphocyte count (P < 0·01), especially CD19 (P < 0·005), CD8 (P < 0·05) and CD56 (P < 0·05). Our results confirm the interindividual variability of MPA AUC in patients treated with MMF in AAV and support a personalized therapy according to blood levels of MPA.