Modulation Of Memory Consolidation Research Articles

Motor learning- and consolidation-related resting state fast and slow brain dynamics across wake and sleep

Motor skills dynamically evolve during practice and after training. Using magnetoencephalography, we investigated the neural dynamics underpinning motor learning and its consolidation in relation to sleep during resting-state periods after the end of learning (boost window, within 30 min) and at delayed time scales (silent 4 h and next day 24 h windows) with intermediate daytime sleep or wakefulness. Resting-state neural dynamics were investigated at fast (sub-second) and slower (supra-second) timescales using Hidden Markov modelling (HMM) and functional connectivity (FC), respectively, and their relationship to motor performance. HMM results show that fast dynamic activities in a Temporal/Sensorimotor state network predict individual motor performance, suggesting a trait-like association between rapidly recurrent neural patterns and motor behaviour. Short, post-training task re-exposure modulated neural network characteristics during the boost but not the silent window. Re-exposure-related induction effects were observed on the next day, to a lesser extent than during the boost window. Daytime naps did not modulate memory consolidation at the behavioural and neural levels. These results emphasise the critical role of the transient boost window in motor learning and memory consolidation and provide further insights into the relationship between the multiscale neural dynamics of brain networks, motor learning, and consolidation.

Role of dopamine D1 receptor in the modulation of memory consolidation by passive and self-administered heroin and associated conditioned stimuli

It has been proposed that opiates modulate memory consolidation, but recent work has indicated that this effect may be mediated by how the drug is experienced (i.e., passive injections vs. self-administration). Because the dopamine (DA) D1 receptor is involved in processing of learning signals and attribution of salience to events experienced by an organism, two studies in male Sprague-Dawley rats tested the effect of blocking this receptor on modulation of memory consolidation by passive and self-administered heroin, in addition to conditioned memory modulation by heroin-paired cues. Using the object location memory task, Study 1 employed SCH23390 (0, 0.05, 0.10 mg/kg, SC) to modulate enhancement of memory consolidation induced by post-training injections of heroin (1 mg/kg, SC) as well as by exposure to the environment paired with heroin injections (6 pairings, 1 h each, 1 mg/kg). Study 2 was conducted in rats that could self-administer heroin (0.05 mg/kg/infusion, IV) and tested whether SCH23390 (0 and 0.1 mg/kg, SC) could prevent memory modulation induced by a change in schedule of self-administration (from fixed to variable ratio). It was found that while repeated passive injections of heroin retained their enhancing effect on memory, when self-administered, heroin enhanced consolidation of object location memory only at the beginning of self-administration and after a change in schedule. Importantly, SCH23390 blocked memory modulation by heroin when passively administered and when the drug was self-administered on a novel schedule. SCH23390 also blocked conditioned memory modulation induced by post-training exposure to heroin-paired cues. Taken together, these results suggest that modulation of memory consolidation by unconditioned and conditioned opiate reinforcers involve a D1-dependent mechanism of salience attribution linked to the anticipation of drug effects.

Enhancement of memory consolidation by an avoidance conditioned stimulus: Modulation by the D3 receptor

Conditioned stimuli (CS) paired with foot-shock can enhance memory consolidation. Because the dopamine D3 receptor (D3R) has been implicated in mediating various responses to CSs, the current study explored its potential role in modulation of memory consolidation by an avoidance CS. Male Sprague-Dawley rats trained to avoid foot-shocks in a two-way signalled active avoidance task (8 sessions, 30 trials per session, 0.8 mA foot-shock) were pre-treated with the D3R antagonist NGB-2904 (Vehicle, 0.1 or 5 mg/kg) and exposed to the CS immediately after the sample phase of an object recognition memory task. Discrimination ratios were assessed 72 h later. Immediate, but not delayed (6 h), post-sample exposure to the CS enhanced object recognition memory and this effect was blocked by NGB-2904. Control experiments with the beta-noradrenergic receptor antagonist propranolol (10 or 20 mg/kg) and D2R antagonist pimozide (0.2 or 0.6 mg/kg) indicated that NGB-2904 targeted post-training memory consolidation. Exploring the pharmacological selectivity of the NGB-2904 effect, it was found that: 1) 5 mg/kg NGB-2904 blocked conditioned memory modulation produced by post-sample exposure to a “weak” CS (one day of avoidance training) and concurrent stimulation of catecholamine activity by 10 mg/kg bupropion; and 2) post-sample exposure to a “weak” CS and concurrent administration of the D3R agonist 7-OH-DPAT (1 mg/kg) enhanced consolidation of object memory. Finally, because 5 mg/kg NGB-2904 had no effect on modulation by avoidance training in the presence of foot-shocks, the findings herein support the hypothesis that the D3R plays an important role in modulation of memory consolidation by CSs.

Double dissociation of perirhinal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and dopamine D2 receptors in modulation of object memory consolidation by nicotine, cocaine and their conditioned stimuli

There are indications that drug conditioned stimuli (CS) may activate neurochemical systems of memory modulation that are activated by the drugs themselves. To directly test this hypothesis, a cholinergic nicotinic receptor antagonist (mecamylamine; MEC: 0, 10 or 30 µg/side) and a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist (l-741,626: 0, 0.63, 2.5 µg/side) were infused in the perirhinal cortex (PRh) to block modulation of object recognition memory consolidation induced by 0.4 mg/kg nicotine, 20 mg/kg cocaine, or their CSs. To establish these CSs, male Sprague-Dawley rats were confined for 2 h in a chamber, the CS+, after injections of 0.4 mg/kg nicotine, or 20 mg/kg cocaine, and in another chamber, the CS−, after injections of vehicle. This was repeated over 10 days (5 drug/CS+ and 5 vehicle/CS− pairings in total). It was found that the memory enhancing action of post-sample nicotine was blocked by intra-PRh infusions of both MEC doses, and 30 µg/side MEC also blocked the memory enhancing action of the nicotine CS. Interestingly, intra-PRh MEC did not block the memory enhancing effect of cocaine, nor that of the cocaine CS. In contrast, the memory enhancing action of post-sample cocaine administration was blocked by both l-741,626 doses, and 2.5 µg/side also blocked the effect of the cocaine CS, but not the memory effects of nicotine or of the nicotine CS. This functional double dissociation strongly indicates that drug CSs modulate memory consolidation by activating neural systems that are activated by the drugs themselves.

The effects of passive and active administration of heroin, and associated conditioned stimuli, on consolidation of object memory

Mode of administration (i.e., active vs passive) could influence the modulatory action that drugs of abuse exert on memory consolidation. Similarly, drug conditioned stimuli modulate memory consolidation and, therefore, acquisition and extinction of this conditioned response could also be influenced by mode of drug administration. Exploring these questions in male Sprague–Dawley rats, Study 1 assessed memory modulation by post-training 0, 0.3 and 1 mg/kg heroin injected subcutaneously in operant chambers (i.e., drug conditioned context). Study 2 asked a similar question but in rats trained to self-administer 0.05 mg/kg/infusion heroin intravenously, as well as in rats that received identical amounts of intravenous heroin but passively, using a yoked design. The period of heroin exposure was followed by repeated drug-free confinement in the conditioned context, and by sessions during which responses on the active lever had no scheduled consequences. Study 2 also included a cue-induced reinstatement session during which lever responses reactivated a light cue previously paired with intravenous heroin infusions. The post-training effects of injected/self-administered/yoked heroin, extinction and reinstatement sessions on memory consolidation were tested using the object location memory task. It was found that post-sample heroin enhanced memory in injected and yoked, but not self-administering, rats. However, post-sample exposure to the heroin cues (i.e., context or/and light cue) modulated memory equally in all groups. Taken together, these data support the conclusion that mode of administration impacts the cognitive consequences of exposure to drugs but not of environmental stimuli linked to their reinforcing effects.

Only tomorrow: Delayed effects of teachers attitude on motor skill learning

Motor skill tasks provide unique opportunities to examine the impact of teachers' feedback on learners’ performance, as the quality and quantity of motor behavior can be objectively assessed during the practice session (online-gains) and afterwards (delayed, offline-gains). We tested the learning and overnight retention of a newly instructed movement sequence in young healthy adults in three conditions of teacher-learner interaction, determined by the feedback afforded by the teacher: Indifferent-minimal (IM), General-encouragement (GE), Positive-social-comparison (PSC). All three conditions resulted in robust within-session gains in speed with no loss of accuracy. However, overnight, most trainees in the GE and PSC groups, but not in the IM group, expressed additional delayed gains. PSC group also exhibited feedback-induced increase in positive mood, which was correlated with their delayed gains. These results indicate that teacher-learner interactions during the learning session can affect long-term skill by modulating memory consolidation processes, even when within-session gains are unaffected.

Application of a pharmacological transcriptome filter identifies a shortlist of mouse glucocorticoid receptor target genes associated with memory consolidation

Glucocorticoids regulate memory consolidation, facilitating long-term storage of relevant information to adequately respond to future stressors in similar conditions. This effect of glucocorticoids is well-established and is observed in multiple types of behaviour that depend on various brain regions. By and large, higher glucocorticoid levels strengthen event-related memory, while inhibition of glucocorticoid signalling impairs consolidation. The mechanism underlying this glucocorticoid effect remains unclear, but it likely involves the transcriptional effects of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). We here used a powerful paradigm to investigate the transcriptional effects of GR in the dorsal hippocampus of mice after training in an auditory fear conditioning task, aiming to identify a shortlist of GR target genes associated to memory consolidation. Therefore, we utilized in an explorative study the properties of selective GR modulators (CORT108297 and CORT118335), alongside the endogenous agonist corticosterone and the classical GR antagonist RU486, to pinpoint GR-dependent transcriptional changes. First, we confirmed that glucocorticoids can modulate memory strength via GR activation. Subsequently, by assessing the specific effects of the available GR-ligands on memory strength, we established a pharmacological filter which we imposed on the hippocampal transcriptome data. This identified a manageable shortlist of eight genes by which glucocorticoids may modulate memory consolidation, warranting in-depth follow-up. Overall, we showcase the strength of the concept of pharmacological transcriptome filtering, which can be readily applied to other research topics with an established role of glucocorticoids.

Amygdala-hippocampal interactions in synaptic plasticity and memory formation

Memories of emotionally arousing events tend to endure longer than other memories. This review compiles findings from several decades of research investigating the role of the amygdala in modulating memories of emotional experiences. Episodic memory is a kind of declarative memory that depends upon the hippocampus, and studies suggest that the basolateral complex of the amygdala (BLA) modulates episodic memory consolidation through interactions with the hippocampus. Although many studies in rodents and imaging studies in humans indicate that the amygdala modulates memory consolidation and plasticity processes in the hippocampus, the anatomical pathways through which the amygdala affects hippocampal regions that are important for episodic memories were unresolved until recent optogenetic advances made it possible to visualize and manipulate specific BLA efferent pathways during memory consolidation. Findings indicate that the BLA influences hippocampal-dependent memories, as well as synaptic plasticity, histone modifications, gene expression, and translation of synaptic plasticity associated proteins in the hippocampus. More recent findings from optogenetic studies suggest that the BLA modulates spatial memory via projections to the medial entorhinal cortex, and that the frequency of activity in this pathway is a critical element of this modulation.

Corticosterone differentially modulates time-dependent fear generalization following mild or moderate fear conditioning training in rats

Stressful and emotionally arousing experiences create strong memories that seem to lose specificity over time. It is uncertain, however, how the stress system contributes to the phenomenon of time-dependent fear generalization. Here, we investigated whether post-training corticosterone (CORT-HBC) injections, given after different training intensities, affect contextual fear memory specificity at several time points. We trained male Wistar rats on the contextual fear conditioning (CFC) task using two footshock intensities (mild CFC, 3 footshocks of 0.3 mA, or moderate CFC, 3x 0.6 mA) and immediately after the training session we administered CORT-HBC systemically. We first tested the animals in a novel context and then in the training context at different intervals following training (2, 14, 28 or 42 days). By measuring freezing in the novel context and then contrasting freezing times shown in both contexts, we inferred contextual fear generalization for each rat, classifying them into Generalizers or Discriminators. Following mild CFC training, the glucocorticoid injection promoted an accurate contextual memory at the recent time point (2 days), and increase the contextual memory accuracy 28 days after training. In contrast, after the moderate CFC training, CORT-HBC facilitated contextual generalization at 14 days, compared to the control group that maintained contextual discrimination at this timepoint. For this training intensity, however, CORT-HBC did not have any effect on recent memory specificity. These findings indicate that treatment with CORT-HBC immediately after the encoding of mild or moderately arousing experiences may differentially modulate memory consolidation and time-dependent fear generalization.

NRG1 accelerates the forgetting of fear memories and facilitates the induction of long-term depression in adult mice.

Forgetting of fear memory is a current medical therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and hippocampal long-term depression (LTD) may be the underlying mechanism. Neuregulin 1 (NRG1), a trophic factor, reportedly modulates memory consolidation and synaptic plasticity. Fear memory was assessed using contextual fear conditioning. Electrophysiology was used to measure LTD and GABAergic transmission in the hippocampus. To determine the contribution of hippocampal NRG1 to fear memory forgetting and low-frequency stimulation (LFS)-induced LTD. Administration of NRG1 in the hippocampus accelerated forgetting of contextual fear memories. Furthermore, NRG1 had no effect on low-frequency stimulation-induced LTD in young mice but significantly facilitated the induction of LTD and GABAergic transmission in adult animals. More importantly, NRG1-facilitated LTD induction in adult mice could be blocked by inhibition of GABAA receptors and NMDAR activation. These findings suggest a role for NRG1 in fear memory forgetting and hippocampal LTD, providing a potential target for the development of drug-assisted PTSD therapy.

Memory enhancing effects of nicotine, cocaine, and their conditioned stimuli; effects of beta-adrenergic and dopamine D2 receptor antagonists.

There is evidence that post-training exposure to nicotine, cocaine, and their conditioned stimuli (CS), enhance memory consolidation in rats. The present study assessed the effects of blocking noradrenergic and dopaminergic receptors on nicotine and cocaine unconditioned and conditioned memory modulation. Males Sprague-Dawley rats tested on the spontaneous object recognition task received post-sample exposure to 0.4mg/kg nicotine, 20mg/kg cocaine, or their CSs, in combination with 5-10mg/kg propranolol (PRO; beta-adrenergic antagonist) or 0.2-0.6mg/kg pimozide (PIM; dopamine D2 receptor antagonist). The CSs were established by confining rats in a chamber (the CS +) after injections of 0.4mg/kg nicotine, or 20mg/kg cocaine, for 2h and in another chamber (the CS -) after injections of vehicle, repeated over 10days (5 drug/CS + and 5 vehicle/CS - pairings in total). Object memory was tested 72h post sample in drug-free animals. Co-administration of PRO or PIM blocked the memory-enhancing effects of post-training injections of nicotine, cocaine, and, importantly, exposure to their CSs. These data suggest that nicotine, cocaine as well as their conditioned stimuli share actions on overlapping noradrenergic and dopaminergic systems to modulate memory consolidation.

Analysis of memory modulation by conditioned stimuli.

Conditioned stimuli (CS) have multiple psychological functions that can potentially contribute to their effect on memory formation. It is generally believed that CS-induced memory modulation is primarily due to conditioned emotional responses, however, well-learned CSs not only generate the appropriate behavioral and physiological reactions required to best respond to an upcoming unconditioned stimulus (US), but they also serve as signals that the US is about to occur. Therefore, it is possible that CSs can impact memory consolidation even when their ability to elicit conditioned emotional arousal is significantly reduced. To test this, male Sprague–Dawley rats trained on a signaled active avoidance task were divided into “Avoider” and “Non-Avoider” subgroups on the basis of percentage avoidance after 6 d of training. Subgroup differences in responding to the CS complex were maintained during a test carried out in the absence of the US. Moreover, the subgroups displayed significant differences in stress-induced analgesia (hot-plate test) immediately after this test, suggesting significant subgroup differences in conditioned emotionality. Importantly, using the spontaneous object recognition task, it was found that immediate post-sample exposure to the avoidance CS complex had a similar enhancing effect on object memory in the two subgroups. Therefore, to our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that a significant conditioned emotional response is not necessary for the action of a predictive CS on modulation of memory consolidation.

In Vivo Characterization of Neurophysiological Diversity in the Lateral Supramammillary Nucleus during Hippocampal Sharp-wave Ripples of Adult Rats

The extent of the networks that control the genesis and modulation of hippocampal sharp-wave ripples (SPW-Rs), which are involved in memory consolidation, remains incompletely understood. Here, we performed a detailed in vivo analysis of single cell firing in the lateral supramammillary nucleus (lSuM) during theta and slow oscillations, including SPW-Rs, in anesthetized rats. We classified neurons as SPW-R-active and SPW-R-unchanged according to whether or not they increased their firing during SPW-Rs. We show that lSuM SPW-R-active neurons increase their firing prior to SPW-Rs peak power and prior to hippocampal excitatory cell activation. Moreover, lSuM SPW-R-active neurons show increased firing activity during theta and slow oscillations as compared to unchanged neurons. These results suggest that a sub-population of lSuM neurons can interact with the hippocampus during SPW-Rs, raising the possibility that the lSuM may modulate memory consolidation.

Possible interaction between the ventral hippocampal cannabinoid CB2 and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors on the modulation of memory consolidation in mice.

To clarify possible interaction between the ventral hippocampal cannabinoid CB2 receptors and the cholinergic system in control of the memory process, the effects of cannabinoid and acetylcholine receptor agents on memory consolidation have been investigated in mice. Animals implanted with bilateral cannulas at the CA3 region of the ventral hippocampus and microinjected with scopolamine and cannabinergic agents. These animals were tested using a one-trial step-down inhibitory avoidance task. The results indicated impairment of memory consolidation by posttraining intra-CA3 microinjection of scopolamine (1 and 2 µg/mouse). Nevertheless, coinjection of various doses of scopolamine (0.01, 1 and 2 µg/mouse) with an ineffective dose of AM630 (1 µg/mouse) or GP1a (1 µg/mouse) did not show any significant effect on deficiency of memory consolidation produced by scopolamine. Posttraining application of cannabinoid CB2 receptor antagonist, AM630 (1, 10 and 100 µg/mouse; intra-CA3) alone had no significant influence on memory performance, but its coinjection with significant dose of scopolamine (1 µg/mouse) decreased memory consolidation. Moreover, posttraining injection of GP1a, cannabinoid CB2 receptor agonist, (10 and 100 µg/mouse; intra-CA3) decreased memory consolidation. Posttraining coadministration of diverse doses of GP1a (1, 10 and 100 µg/mouse; intra-CA3) with an effective dose of scopolamine (1 µg/mouse) meaningfully increased deficiency of memory consolidation produced by GP1a (100 µg/mouse). In addition, all drugs had no significant effect on locomotion. Consequently, these results propose that a probable interaction between the CA3 cannabinoid CB2 receptors and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR) modulates memory consolidation process in mice.

Distinct temporal integration of noradrenaline signaling by astrocytic second messengers during vigilance

Astrocytes may function as mediators of the impact of noradrenaline on neuronal function. Activation of glial α1-adrenergic receptors triggers rapid astrocytic Ca2+ elevation and facilitates synaptic plasticity, while activation of β-adrenergic receptors elevates cAMP levels and modulates memory consolidation. However, the dynamics of these processes in behaving mice remain unexplored, as do the interactions between the distinct second messenger pathways. Here we simultaneously monitored astrocytic Ca2+ and cAMP and demonstrate that astrocytic second messengers are regulated in a temporally distinct manner. In behaving mice, we found that while an abrupt facial air puff triggered transient increases in noradrenaline release and large cytosolic astrocytic Ca2+ elevations, cAMP changes were not detectable. By contrast, repeated aversive stimuli that lead to prolonged periods of vigilance were accompanied by robust noradrenergic axonal activity and gradual sustained cAMP increases. Our findings suggest distinct astrocytic signaling pathways can integrate noradrenergic activity during vigilance states to mediate distinct functions supporting memory.

Attention and emotion do not modulate memory consolidation in a short sleep relative to wake

Attention and emotion do not modulate memory consolidation in a short sleep relative to wake

Short Duration Repetitive Transcranial Electrical Stimulation During Sleep Enhances Declarative Memory of Facts.

Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) during sleep has been shown to successfully modulate memory consolidation. Here, we tested the effect of short duration repetitive tES (SDR-tES) during a daytime nap on the consolidation of declarative memory of facts in healthy individuals. We use a previously described approach to deliver the stimulation at regular intervals during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep, specifically stage NREM2 and NREM3. Similar to previous studies using tES, we find enhanced memory performance compared to sham both after sleep and 48 h later. We also observed an increase in the proportion of time spent in NREM3 sleep and SDR-tES boosted the overall rate of slow oscillations (SOs) during NREM2/NREM3 sleep. Retrospective investigation of brain activity immediately preceding stimulation suggests that increases in the SO rate are more likely when stimulation is delivered during quiescent and asynchronous periods of activity in contrast to other closed-loop approaches which target phasic stimulation during ongoing SOs.

Competitive learning modulates memory consolidation during sleep.

Competition between memories can cause weakening of those memories. Here we investigated memory competition during sleep in human participants by presenting auditory cues that had been linked to two distinct picture-location pairs during wake. We manipulated competition during learning by requiring participants to rehearse picture-location pairs associated with the same sound either competitively (choosing to rehearse one over the other, leading to greater competition) or separately; we hypothesized that greater competition during learning would lead to greater competition when memories were cued during sleep. With separate-pair learning, we found that cueing benefited spatial retention. With competitive-pair learning, no benefit of cueing was observed on retention, but cueing impaired retention of well-learned pairs (where we expected strong competition). During sleep, post-cue beta power (16-30 Hz) indexed competition and predicted forgetting, whereas sigma power (11-16 Hz) predicted subsequent retention. Taken together, these findings show that competition between memories during learning can modulate how they are consolidated during sleep.

Efficacy of slow oscillatory-transcranial direct current stimulation on EEG and memory - contribution of an inter-individual factor.

Despite many reports on beneficial effects of anodal slow oscillatory-transcranial direct current stimulation (so-tDCS) during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep on memory consolidation, frequent negative outcomes have also been observed. Our working hypothesis is that so-tDCS efficacy is strongly dependent upon the susceptibility of the underlying network. One component determining susceptibility of the network is hypothesized to be reflected in learning or 'task-induced' plastic changes. Another component is hypothesized to represent inter-individual confounds. Twenty-five (15 female) healthy students participated in two learning conditions with and without so-tDCS during early nocturnal NREM sleep and in one control condition without learning tasks. So-tDCS was applied in five 5-min blocks. EEG was assessed during two time windows: an acute period with five 1-min epochs after each stimulation block and a 150-min post-stimulation time period. Inter-individual differences were assessed by a memory quotient (MQ) and subjects classified into high- vs. low-scoring groups. Although so-tDCS was efficient in enhancing fast spindle parameters in the 150-min time period in all subjects, so-tDCS failed to modulate memory consolidation. In contrast, in subjects with a high MQ, memory retention on a figural paired-associate task was significantly increased after so-tDCS. Task-induced slow spindle density was modulated in the opposite direction in subjects with high vs. low MQ being increased in the high-MQ group only. Effects of so-tDCS on EEG were limited to fast spindle modulations in both time windows. These results reveal that inter-individual confound can impact so-tDCS efficacy, suggesting potential use of such factors as biomarkers.

Dorsal hippocampal cannabinergic and GABAergic systems modulate memory consolidation in passive avoidance task

In the present research, we examined the possible interaction between the hippocampal CB2 and GABAA receptors on modulation of memory consolidation. In this research, step-down passive a .voidance task was used to evaluate memory consolidation in adult male NMRI mice. The results showed that post-training intra-CA1 administration of muscimol (0.05 and 0.1 μg/mouse) impaired memory consolidation as evidenced by a decrease in step-down latency on the test day, which was suggestive of drug-produced amnesia. However co-administration of different doses of muscimol (0.01, 0.05 and 0.1 μg/mouse) along with a not-effect dose of AM630 (1 μg/mouse) or GP1a (1 μg/mouse) had no significant effect on impairment of memory consolidation induced by muscimol. Although post-training intra-CA1 administration of the cannabinoid CB2 receptor antagonist, AM630 (1, 10 and 100 μg/mouse) alone had no effect, its co-administration with an effective dose of muscimol (0.05 μg/mouse) impaired memory consolidation. Furthermore, post-training intra-CA1 microinjection of cannabinoid CB2 receptor agonist, GP1a (100 μg/mouse) impaired memory consolidation. Interestingly, post-training intra-CA1 co-injection of different doses of GP1a (1, 10 and 100 μg/mouse) along with an effect dose of muscimol (0.05 μg/mouse) significantly intensified impairment of memory consolidation induced by GP1a (10 μg/mouse). Moreover, all above doses of drugs did not significantly change locomotor activity. These findings suggest possible interaction between the CA1 cannabinoid CB2 and GABAA mechanisms on modulation of memory consolidation in mice.