Modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index Research Articles

A Comparative Analysis of Clinical Symptoms and Modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index Among Endoscopic Phenotypes of the J Pouch in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

The modified pouchitis disease activity index (mPDAI) based on clinical symptoms and endoscopic findings is used to diagnose pouchitis, but validated instruments to monitor pouchitis are still lacking. We recently established an endoscopic classification that described 7 endoscopic phenotypes with different outcomes. We assessed symptoms and compared mPDAIs among phenotypes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We retrospectively reviewed pouchoscopies and classified them into 7 main phenotypes: normal (n = 25), afferent limb (AL) involvement (n = 4), inlet involvement (n = 14), diffuse (n = 7), focal inflammation of the pouch body (n = 25), cuffitis (n = 18), and pouch-related fistulas (n = 10) with a single phenotype were included. Complete-case analysis was conducted. One hundred and three IBD patients were included. The median mPDAI was 0 (IQR 0-1.0) in patients with a normal pouch. Among inflammatory phenotypes, the highest median mPDAI was 4.0 (IQR 2.25-4.75) in cuffitis, followed by 3.0 (IQR 2.5-4.0) in diffuse inflammation, 2.5 (IQR 1.25-4.0) in inlet involvement, 2.5 (IQR 2.0-3.5) in AL involvement, 2.0 (IQR 1.0-3.0) in focal inflammation, and 1.0 (IQR 0.25-2.0) in the fistula phenotype. Perianal symptoms were frequently observed in pouch-related fistulas (8/10, 80%) and cuffitis (13/15, 87%). Among patients with cuffitis, all had incomplete emptying (6/6, 100%). We correlated the mPDAI with the endoscopic phenotypes and described the limited utility of symptoms in distinguishing between inflammatory phenotypes. Further studies are warranted to understand which symptoms should be monitored for each phenotype and whether mPDAI can be minimized after pouch normalization.

Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab for Chronic Pouchitis: A Prospective Open-label Multicenter Study

Seventeen percent of patients with ulcerative colitis that undergo proctocolectomy with pouch surgery will develop chronic pouchitis. We evaluated the efficacy of ustekinumab for these patients. We performed a prospective study of chronic pouchitis patients receiving ustekinumab intravenously at baseline (∼6mg/kg) and 90mg ustekinumab subcutaneously every 8 weeks thereafter. The modified pouchitis disease activity index (mPDAI) was assessed at baseline, week 16 and 48. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving steroid-free remission (mPDAI <5 and reduction by ≥2 points) at week 16. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving remission at week 48, the proportion of patients achieving response (reduction of mPDAI by ≥2 points) at week 16 and 48, and change in mPDAI. We enrolled 22 patients (59% male, median age 42.2 years). Remission was achieved in 27.3% at week 16 and 36.4% at week 48. Response was achieved in 54.5% both at week 16 and 48. The median (IQR) mPDAI decreased from 8 (7-10) to 7 (4-9) at week 16 (p=0.007) and 4 (1.75-7.25) at week 48 (p<0.001). The clinical mPDAI subscore decreased from 3.5 (2-4) to 2 (1-3) at week 16 (p=0.009) and 1 (0-2.25) at week 48 (p=0.001). The endoscopic mPDAI subscore decreased from 5.5 (4-6) to 4 (3-6) at week 16 (p=0.032) and 3 (1.75-4.25) at week 48 (p=0.001). Ustekinumab was efficacious in half of the patients suffering from chronic pouchitis. Ustekinumab should therefore be positioned in the treatment algorithm of chronic pouchitis. (ClinicalTrials.gov Number NCT04089345).

P034 Peripheral immune cell activity and biopsy gene expression in chronic pouchitis patients treated with tofacitinib: early induction results from the STOPit trial

Abstract Background The Study of TOfacitinib for the treatment of chronic PouchITis (STOPit) is an investigator-initiated, open-label induction, double-blind, placebo-controlled, maintenance withdrawal study to determine the effectiveness of tofacitinib at inducing and maintaining remission in patients with chronic pouchitis. In this interim assessment, we evaluated blood samples and biopsy gene expression collected during the open-label induction period to discover biomarkers of initial clinical response. Methods We collected blood (n = 10 pairs, n = 5 non-responders) and biopsies (n = 21 pairs, n = 9 non-responders) at baseline and after 8 weeks of tofacitinib induction therapy (all participants received 10 mg twice daily induction). We classified patients as responders if they achieved a decrease of ≥ 2 in their modified pouchitis disease activity index after 8 weeks. Bulk peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and memory CD4+ T cells (TMEMs) were isolated from whole blood samples. Cytokines induced by stimulation in the presence or absence of tofacitinib were assessed in culture supernatants by bead array (PBMCs stimulated with PMA/Io or LPS, TMEMs stimulated with CD3/CD28 tetramer). Gene expression was measured in biopsies by qPCR in the pouch and pre-pouch ileum at both time points. Results At baseline, non-responders produced more IL-17 from both their PBMCs stimulated with PMA/Io and TMEMs stimulated with tetramer than responders, but responders secreted more IL-12p70, MCP, IL-10 and IL-8. Tofacitinib inhibited stimulation-induced IL-10 and IL-6 secretion in PBMCs in both responders and non-responders but failed to reduce IFNγ and TNF secretion selectively in non-responders only. All cytokine responses investigated in TMEMs, including IFNγ and TNF, were inhibited by tofacitinib in both responders and non-responders, suggesting the PBMC cell type refractory to inhibition with tofacitinib in non-responders is not TMEMs. Baseline biopsy ileal gene expression of IL18, HES1 and CXCL10 was decreased in responders compared to non-responders, while MMP7 was increased. Clinical response to tofacitinib led to a reduction in pouch expression of GLIS3, G0S2 and WNT5a from baseline to week 8 whereas these genes were unchanged or increased in non-responders. Conclusion Baseline functional immune cell responses and biopsy gene expression may discriminate chronic pouchitis patients' response to tofacitinib therapy and point to a mechanism underlying non-responsiveness. Recruitment for this trial is ongoing, allowing us to bolster and expand our findings with increasing sample sizes.

P682 A Retrospective Comparison of Different Treatment Modalities in Patients with Chronic Pouchitis

Abstract Background Chronic pouchitis affects ~30% of patients post total colectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) surgery. Treatment with anti-TNF, anti-integrin α4β7, anti-IL-12/23, or Crohn's disease exclusion diet (CDED), have shown promise in different studies. We aimed to compare the efficacy of these treatments in a real-world context and to detect factors that can aid in treatment choices. Methods A retrospective cohort study encompassing demographic, clinic, endoscopic, histologic and lab values of adult ulcerative colitis (UC) patients post-IPAA surgery with chronic pouchitis, treated with biologics or CDED at the Tel Aviv Medical Center. Data were collected at baseline, 12, 26, and 52 weeks of treatment. Primary outcomes were assessed using the modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (mPDAI). mPDAI response was defined as a reduction from baseline of ≥2 points, while mPDAI remission was defined as mPDAI response in addition to mPDAI score ≤4. Results Therapeutic interventions among 51 patients included CDED (n=10), vedolizumab (n=21), ustekinumab (n=7) and adalimumab (n=13) [Table 1]. At 12 and 26 weeks, overall mPDAI response rates were 52% and 48%, respectively, with no significant difference between groups. At 52 weeks, mPDAI response rates were significantly higher for ustekinumab and vedolizumab (60% and 55%, respectively) compared with adalimumab and CDED (27.3% and 0%, respectively), p=0.043. Fecal calprotectin reduction at week-26 was greatest for ustekinumab (93%), followed by vedolizumab (73%), adalimumab (55%), and CDED (-13%), p=0.003. Treatment persistence over 150 weeks was significantly higher for ustekinumab (100%) compared with adalimumab (46%), vedolizumab (33%), and CDED (20%), p&amp;lt;0.001 [Figure 1]. The predominant cause for treatment discontinuation was secondary loss of response (50%), followed by primary non-response and surgical complications (14.7% each), poor compliance (11.8%), side-effects (5.9%), and development of antibodies (2.9%). Patients without prior biologic or immunomodulator treatment for pouchitis had significantly higher mPDAI response rates at 12 weeks (90%, p=0.016 and 73.3%, p=0.03, respectively). Patients with surgical pouch complications showed a trend towards lower mPDAI-defined response rates at 12 weeks (25% vs. 64.7%; p = 0.064). Conclusion Ustekinumab and vedolizumab demonstrate higher likelihood of maintaining long-term clinical and endoscopic response, along with greater reduction in fecal calprotectin compared with adalimumab and CDED. Biologic and immunomodulator therapy-naïve patients achieved higher induction response rates.

P854 Tofacitinib demonstrates preliminary efficacy in induction of remission in chronic pouchitis

Abstract Background Pouchitis is common following total proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC) and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and generally responds to antibiotics. However, up to 20% of patients develop either antibiotic-dependent or antibiotic-refractory pouchitis, collectively referred to as chronic pouchitis. Methods We report our preliminary induction results from a multi-center open label induction with randomized withdrawal trial to assess the efficacy of tofacitinib in chronic pouchitis. All eligible participants received 10mg tofacitinib twice daily for 8 weeks, with an additional 8 weeks of therapy given to patients with an inadequate initial clinical response. The primary endpoint was clinical response (a reduction of clinical PDAI≥2) at week 8. Secondary endpoints included endoscopic response (a reduction of endoscopic PDAI≥2), mPDAI remission (modified pouchitis disease activity index (mPDAI)≤ 4 and a reduction of mPDAI≥2), mPDAI response (a reduction of mPDAI≥2) and improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using the short inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (SIBDQ). Serum cytokine levels was analyzed using LEGENDplex human inflammation panel 1. Univariate analysis was performed to identify clinical and biochemical predictors of response to tofacitinib. Results A total of 33 patients with chronic pouchitis (Table 1) were included in the preliminary analysis. The clinical and endoscopic response rates at week 8 were 55% and 58% respectively, with a median improvement of 1 (p&amp;lt;0.05) and 3 (p&amp;lt;0.05) respectively (Figure 1). The mPDAI remission rate was 49% at week 8 with an mPDAI response rate of 73%. Endoscopic responders exhibited significant improvements in endoscopic oedema, granularity, friability, and mucous exudate (p&amp;lt;0.05). There was significant improvement in HRQoL, with the median SIBDQ score increasing from 35 at baseline to 54 at week 8 (p&amp;lt;0.05). Eleven patients received a further 8 weeks of therapy with a clinical response rate of 36%, yielding an overall response rate including extended induction of 67%. Univariate analysis did not reveal significant differences in baseline characteristics, clinical, or biochemical markers between responders and non-responders. However, a history of corticosteroid use (p=0.08) and high baseline levels of faecal calprotectin (p=0.15) demonstrated a non-significant association with treatment response. Elevated baseline serum levels of IL-1b, IFN-a and IL-33 were associated with a treatment response at week 8 (p&amp;lt;0.05). Conclusion Tofacitinib demonstrated preliminary efficacy in inducing both clinical and endoscopic response in patients with chronic pouchitis who have undergone IPAA for UC.

Treatment of Antibiotic Refractory Chronic Pouchitis With JAK Inhibitors and S1P Receptor Modulators: An ECCO CONFER Multicentre Case Series.

Data regarding the effectiveness and safety of Janus kinase [JAK] inhibitors and sphingosine-1-phosphate [S1P] receptor modulators in antibiotic refractory chronic pouchitis [CARP] are lacking. This ECCO-CONFER project retrospectively collected data for JAK inhibitor or S1P receptor modulator treatments for CARP with at least 3 months of follow-up. The outcomes included corticosteroid- and antibiotic-free clinical response and remission at 3 and 12 months, and trends in modified pouchitis disease activity index [mPDAI], endoscopic PDAI, C-reactive protein, and calprotectin. Seventeen treatments in 15 patients were evaluated. Previous pouchitis treatments included infliximab [5/15], adalimumab [4/15], vedolizumab [9/15], and ustekinumab [5/15]. Pooling data on JAK inhibitors [eight tofacitinib, one filgotinib, and six upadacitinib] after 3 months [T3], steroid- and antibiotic-free clinical response was achieved in 53.3% [8/15], and steroid- and antibiotic-free clinical remission was achieved in 40% [6/15]. Of the patients with at least 12 months of follow-up, steroid- and antibiotic-free clinical response was achieved in 50% [3/6] and remission in one patient [16.7%], endoscopic response in 50% [3/6], and endoscopic remission in 50% [3/6]. Of the two ozanimod treatments at T3, steroid- and antibiotic-free clinical response was achieved in one patient, without remission; both discontinued ozanimod before T12. No side effects were reported. Small molecules may represent a suitable option for CARP refractory to multiple biologics, deserving further investigation.

Vedolizumab for the Treatment of Chronic Pouchitis

BackgroundApproximately half the patients with ulcerative colitis who undergo restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis (IPAA) will subsequently have pouchitis, and among those patients, one fifth will have chronic pouchitis.MethodsWe conducted a phase 4, double-blind, randomized trial to evaluate vedolizumab in adult patients in whom chronic pouchitis had developed after undergoing IPAA for ulcerative colitis. Patients were assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive vedolizumab intravenously at a dose of 300 mg or placebo on day 1 and at weeks 2, 6, 14, 22, and 30. All the patients received concomitant ciprofloxacin from weeks 1 to 4. The primary end point was modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (mPDAI)–defined remission (an mPDAI score of ≤4 and a reduction from baseline of ≥2 points in the mPDAI total score; scores range from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe pouchitis) at week 14. The mPDAI is based on clinical symptoms and endoscopic findings. Other efficacy end points included mPDAI-defined remission at week 34, mPDAI-defined response (a reduction from baseline of ≥2 points in the mPDAI score) at weeks 14 and 34, and PDAI-defined remission (a PDAI score of ≤6 and a reduction from baseline of ≥3 points; scores range from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating more severe pouchitis) at weeks 14 and 34. The PDAI is based on clinical symptoms, endoscopic findings, and histologic findings.ResultsAmong the 102 patients who underwent randomization, the incidence of mPDAI-defined remission at week 14 was 31% (16 of 51 patients) with vedolizumab and 10% (5 of 51 patients) with placebo (difference, 21 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5 to 38; P=0.01). Differences in favor of vedolizumab over placebo were also seen with respect to mPDAI-defined remission at week 34 (difference, 17 percentage points; 95% CI, 0 to 35), mPDAI-defined response at week 14 (difference, 30 percentage points; 95% CI, 8 to 48) and at week 34 (difference, 22 percentage points; 95% CI, 2 to 40), and PDAI-defined remission at week 14 (difference, 25 percentage points; 95% CI, 8 to 41) and at week 34 (difference, 19 percentage points; 95% CI, 2 to 37). Serious adverse events occurred in 3 of 51 patients (6%) in the vedolizumab group and in 4 of 51 patients (8%) in the placebo group.ConclusionsTreatment with vedolizumab was more effective than placebo in inducing remission in patients who had chronic pouchitis after undergoing IPAA for ulcerative colitis. (Funded by Takeda; EARNEST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02790138; EudraCT number, 2015-003472-78.)

P521 Effectiveness of ustekinumab as therapy for chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis

Abstract Background Up to 10% of patients with ulcerative colitis who undergo a proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, will develop chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis (CARP). As there is a large unmet need in the management of these patients, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of induction and maintenance therapy with ustekinumab (UST). Methods We performed a prospective, multicentre, open-label study of patients with CARP (mPDAI ≥5 with an endoscopic subscore ≥2) . Patients received a weight-range-based infusion of UST at baseline (~6mg/kg) and subcutaneous injections of 90mg UST every 8 weeks thereafter until week 48. Patients underwent a pouchoscopy at baseline, week 16 and week 48, with assessment of the modified pouchitis disease activity index (mPDAI). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving steroid-free remission (mPDAI &amp;lt;5 and reduction by ≥2 points from baseline) at week 16. For this abstract we focus on the secondary endpoints at week 48 including the proportion of patients achieving steroid-free remission and response (reduction of mPDAI by ≥2 points from baseline) using a non-responder imputation. For patients still continuing UST at week 48, we evaluated the change in symptomatic and endoscopic mPDAI subscore, C-reactive protein (CRP) and faecal calprotectin levels compared to baseline. Descriptive statistics and paired nonparametric tests (Wilcoxon signed-rank) of changes from baseline were performed. Results We enrolled 22 patients (59% male, median age 42.2 years, median time after surgery 8.2 years). Twelve (54.5%) patients had previously been treated with biologics for CARP (table 1). At week 16, steroid-free remission was achieved in 27.3% of patients. At week 48, steroid-free remission was achieved in 36.4% and response in 54.5% of patients. In the 14 patients continuing UST at week 48, a significant decrease in total mPDAI (4 (1.8-7.3) vs. 8 (8-10), p&amp;lt;0.001), clinical subscore (1 (0-2.3) vs. 3 (2-4), p=0.001), and endoscopic subscore (3 (1.8-4.3) vs. 6 (4.8-6), p=0.001) was observed compared to baseline (figure 1). Faecal calprotectin (129 (80-344) vs. 229 (139-541) mg/kg, p=0.17) and CRP (2.5 (1.3-4.4) vs. 3.8 (1.6-9.3) mg/L, p=0.09) levels did however not decrease significantly (figure 2 and 3). Three serious adverse events (hospitalization for subobstruction, worsening pouchitis and choledocholithiasis) were recorded, but were not considered related to UST. Conclusion In this open-label pilot study in patients with CARP, maintenance therapy with UST showed a clinical and endoscopic effect in half of the patients, but was not associated with changes in inflammatory biomarkers. These promising results warrant confirmation in a placebo-controlled study with UST for the treatment of CARP.

Associations between Pouchitis and Fecal Calprotectin after Restorative Proctocolectomy in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

Introduction: Recently, fecal calprotectin has been identified and used as an assessment tool for the confirmation of disease activity in ulcerative colitis. Although a meta-analysis suggested the usefulness of fecal calprotectin for the assessment of pouchitis, the number of participants was still insufficient. Therefore, we prospectively measured fecal calprotectin levels during pouchoscopy and analyzed their associations with pouchitis. Methods: Patients who underwent pouchoscopy after total proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis were included. Fecal samples were collected for the measurement of calprotectin during pouchoscopy. Patients either with or without suspicious pouchitis were included. Pouchitis was defined as a modified pouchitis disease activity index (m-PDAI) score of ≥5. The associations between the development of pouchitis and the m-PDAI score and fecal calprotectin and serum markers, including C-related protein, albumin, and white blood cells, were assessed. Results: A total of 170 patients were included. Seventy-two patients were diagnosed with pouchitis with an m-PDAI score of 7.3 ± 1.5. The values of fecal calprotectin were 1,500 ± 1,544 μg/g in patients with pouchitis and 259 ± 402 μg/g in patients without pouchitis (p < 0.01). The correlation coefficient between calprotectin and the m-PDAI score was significant (r² = 0.279, p < 0.001). The cutoff value of fecal calprotectin in receiver operating characteristic analysis was 246 μg/g (area under curve 0.85, sensitivity 83.9%, specificity 71.0%). Fecal samples were able to be collected from 6 patients. The levels of fecal calprotectin significantly decreased from 2,101.3 ± 880.3 μg/g to 284.2 ± 96.9 μg/g in response to the treatment. Conclusions: Elevated fecal calprotectin appeared to be significantly correlated with pouchitis. We should consider the alteration of this marker during treatments in further studies.

Prediction of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis using artificial intelligence and deep learning.

Pouchitis is one of the major postoperative complications of ulcerative colitis (UC), and it is still difficult to predict the development of pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in UC patients. In this study, we examined whether a deep learning (DL) model could predict the development of pouchitis. UC patients who underwent two-stage restorative proctocolectomy with IPAA at Keio University Hospital were included in this retrospective analysis. The modified pouchitis disease activity index (mPDAI) was evaluated by the clinical and endoscopic findings. Pouchitis was defined as an mPDAI ≥ 5.860; endoscopic pouch images before ileostomy closure were collected. A convolutional neural network was used as the DL model, and the prediction rates of pouchitis after ileostomy closure were evaluated by fivefold cross-validation. A total of 43 patients were included (24 males and 19 females, mean age 39.2 ± 13.2years). Pouchitis occurred in 14 (33%) patients after ileostomy closure. In less than half of the patients, mPDAI scores matched before and after ileostomy closure. Most of patients whose mPDAI scores did not match before and after ileostomy closure had worse mPDAI scores after than before. The prediction rate of pouchitis calculated by the area under the curve using the DL model was 84%. Conversely, the prediction rate of pouchitis using mPDAI before ileostomy closure was 62%. The prediction rate of pouchitis using the DL model was more than 20% higher than that using mPDAI, suggesting the utility of the DL model as a prediction model for the development of pouchitis. It could also be used to determine early interventions for pouchitis.

P496 Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab for chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis: A Belgian open-label multicentre pilot study

Abstract Background Up to 10% of ulcerative colitis patients who undergo a proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, will develop chronic antibiotic refractory pouchitis (CARP). As there is a large unmet need in the management of these patients, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of induction therapy with ustekinumab (UST) for this indication. Methods We performed a prospective, Belgian, multicentre, open-label study of patients with CARP. Patients received a weight-range-based infusion of UST at baseline (6mg/kg) and one subcutaneous injection of 90mg UST at week 8. The first 4 weeks, ciprofloxacin 500mg BID was added as bridging therapy, but need of antibiotics thereafter was regarded as treatment failure. Patients underwent pouchoscopy at baseline and week 16, with assessment of the modified pouchitis disease activity index (mPDAI). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving clinically relevant steroid-free remission (mPDAI &amp;lt;5 and reduction by ≥2 points from baseline) at week 16. Secondary endpoints at week 16 were the proportion of patients achieving response (reduction of mPDAI by ≥2 points from baseline), change in symptomatic and endoscopic mPDAI subscore, and change in C-reactive protein (CRP) and faecal calprotectin levels compared to baseline. Descriptive statistics and paired nonparametric tests (Wilcoxon signed-rank) of changes from baseline were performed. Results We report the first 18 patients (56% male, median age 41.5 years, median time after surgery 11.2 years) who reached the primary endpoint assessment. Eleven (61.1%) patients had previously been treated with biologics (anti-TNF, n=8; vedolizumab, n=6; tofacitinib, n=1) for CARP (table 1). At week 16, clinically relevant steroid-free remission was reached in 27.8% and response in 50.0% of patients. A significant decrease in total mPDAI (8.0 (7.0–8.3) vs. 6.5 (3.8–9.0), p=0.04) and clinical subscore (3.0 (2.0–4.0) vs. 2.0 (1.0–3.3), p=0.04) but not endoscopic subscore (5.0 (4.0–6.0) vs. 4.0 (3.0–6.0), p=0.1) was observed at week 16 (figure 1). Faecal calprotectin (288.0 (154.8–634.8) vs. 145 (88.3–749.3) mg/kg, p=0.47) and CRP (4.8 (1.9–7.2) vs. 3.9 (1.9–8.9) mg/L, p=0.63) levels did however not decrease significantly (figure 2). Three serious adverse events (hospitalization for subobstruction, worsening pouchitis and choledocholithiasis) were recorded, but were not considered related to UST. Conclusion In this open-label pilot study in patients with CARP, induction therapy with UST showed a clinical effect in half of the patients, but was not associated with endoscopic improvement or changes in inflammatory biomarkers. Placebo-controlled studies are needed for further positioning UST in the treatment algorithm of CARP.

OP04 Vedolizumab intravenous is effective across multiple treatment targets in chronic pouchitis: Results of the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled EARNEST trial

Abstract Background Pouchitis is a common complication of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) after proctocolectomy in ulcerative colitis (UC). There are currently no approved therapies for chronic pouchitis. Here, we report a multicentre trial of intravenous (IV) vedolizumab (VDZ) for chronic pouchitis after IPAA in patients with UC. Methods EARNEST was a randomised, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled, phase 4 study of VDZ in patients aged 18–80 years with chronic pouchitis after proctocolectomy with IPAA for UC (NCT02790138). Male and female patients with a history of IPAA for UC and chronic pouchitis were eligible. Patients were randomised (1:1) to receive VDZ IV (300 mg) or PBO on Day 1 and at Weeks (W) 2, 6, 14, 22 and 30, as well as ciprofloxacin for the first 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (mPDAI) remission at W14; efficacy was also assessed through other mPDAI/PDAI secondary endpoints and endoscopic exploratory endpoints (assessed by a central reviewer) at W14 and W34. Safety (adverse events [AEs]) was monitored throughout the study. Results In total, 102 patients were treated (51 per group). Patients had a mean age of 40.8 years (VDZ) and 42.9 years (PBO). mPDAI remission rates (comprising clinical symptoms and endoscopy domains) were 31.4% (n=16/51) for VDZ vs 9.8% (n=5/51) for PBO at W14 (p=0.013; Figure 1). Significant differences in favour of VDZ over PBO were also seen in mPDAI remission at W34, mPDAI response at W14 and W34, and PDAI remission (comprising clinical symptoms, endoscopy and histology domains) at W14 and W34 (Figure 1). The rate of sustained remission (defined as remission at both W14 and W34) was higher for VDZ vs PBO on both the mPDAI (VDZ 27.5% [n=14/51] vs PBO 5.9% [n=3/51]; difference 21.6 percentage points [95% confidence interval (CI), 6.5–37.0]) and the PDAI (VDZ 31.4% [n=16/51] vs PBO 7.8% [4/51]; difference 23.5 percentage points [95% CI, 8.0–38.8]). Endoscopic ulceration analysis showed greater reductions in number of ulcers from baseline for VDZ over PBO at W14 and W34 (Figure 2). A higher proportion of patients in the VDZ vs PBO group had an improved SES-CD score and achieved SES-CD remission of pouchitis (Figure 2). AE rates were similar between groups and no new safety signals were identified (Table). Conclusion This is the first and largest randomised, double-blind PBO-controlled trial of biologic therapy to show significant benefits across multiple treatment outcomes in patients with chronic pouchitis after IPAA for UC. VDZ showed consistent treatment benefits over PBO across clinical, endoscopic and histologic endpoints, together with safety consistent with its established profile.

S726 A Comparative Analysis of the Modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index and the Endoscopic Phenotypes of the J Pouch in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

S726 A Comparative Analysis of the Modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index and the Endoscopic Phenotypes of the J Pouch in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

S732 Comparative Long-Term Drug Survival of First-Line Biologic Agents for Ulcerative Colitis

Introduction: Real-world data comparing long-term survival of first-line biologics for ulcerative colitis (UC) is limited. We sought to compare long-term drug survival related to non-response (NR) and adverse effects (AEs) among biologic-naïve UC patients initiating infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA), or vedolizumab (VDZ). Methods: Retrospective cohort study of adult, biologic-naïve UC patients initiating IFX, ADA, or VDZ 6/1/14-11/30/20 at a large academic center. Electronic health records were reviewed for clinical data. The primary outcome was time to biologic discontinuation for primary/secondary NR (including colectomy), confirmed by documentation of inadequate therapeutic effect. The secondary outcome was time to discontinuation for AEs. Kaplan-Meier analysis (KMA) and Cox regression were used to compare outcomes. Patients were censored at loss of follow-up, discontinuation for reasons unrelated to outcome, colectomy for dysplasia, or death, whichever occurred first. Confounders for Cox analyses were chosen a priori from the literature; p< 0.025 was considered significant. The proportional hazards assumption was tested using Shoenfeld residuals. Results: 503 UC patients initiated IFX (n=194), ADA (n=169), or VDZ (n=140) 6/1/14-11/30/20. Baseline characteristics compared by biologic are presented in Table 1. Biologic discontinuation for NR occurred in 52/194 (26.7%) for IFX, 77/169 (45.6%) ADA, and 30/140 (21.4%) VDZ (p< 0.01). Discontinuation for AEs occurred in 41/194 (21.1%) for IFX, 22/169 (13.0%) ADA, and 7/140 (5.0%) VDZ (p< 0.01). KMA demonstrated separation in drug survival curves for NR (Fig 1A) and AEs (Fig 1C). For the NR Cox model (Fig 1B), ADA but not VDZ was associated with greater hazard for discontinuation vs IFX (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.5-3.6); higher serum albumin was associated with lower hazard for discontinuation (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.9). For the AE Cox model (Fig 1D), VDZ but not ADA was associated with lower hazard for discontinuation vs IFX (HR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.5); dose escalation was associated with lower hazard (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.6) and female sex was associated with greater hazard for discontinuation (HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-3.7). Common AEs involved joints, rashes, infections, and infusion reactions (Fig 1E). Conclusion: After adjusting for confounders, ADA but not VDZ had a higher rate of NR compared to IFX. VDZ but not ADA had a lower rate of AEs compared to IFX. Prospective studies comparing long-term outcomes of biologics in UC are needed to personalize treatment decisions.Table 1.: Disease characteristics of the patient cohort.Figure 1.: Modified pouchitis disease activity index (mPDAI) among pouch phenotypes.

P372 Effectiveness and safety of immunosuppressants for pouch disorders: results from the RESERVO Study of GETECCU

Abstract Background Pouchitis and other inflammatory disorders of the pouch (IDP), such as Crohn′s-like disease of the pouch (CDP), are frequent in patients operated for a previous diagnosis of ulcerative colitis. Many different therapies have been used, but the effectiveness of immunosupresants (IMM) has been poorly explored in this setting. Our aim was to evaluate the use, efficacy and safety of IMM in patients with pouchitis or another IDP. Methods Retrospective and multicentric study of a Spanish cohort of pouch-carrying patients with previous diagnosis of ulcerative colitis, and subsequent diagnosis of IDP, following ECCO diagnostic criteria. Patients who used IMM to treat these conditions were selected. Clinical effectiveness was evaluated at long-term. We defined clinical remission as returning to the previous stool frequency, no pain or defecatory urgency, clinical response as the improvement in these parameters without the achievement of remission, and non-response as no improvement or worsening symptoms. Endoscopic response was evaluated when possible using modified pouchitis disease activity index (PDAI) endoscopic subscore. Adverse events were collected. We used descriptive statistics. Results In the overall cohort of 338 patients with IDP, 93 (27%) were treated with IMM. Of those, 57% males, median age 40 (20-71) ys, and 72% non-smokers. Colectomy was performed at a median age of 31 (18-63) ys and IPD was diagnosed 25 (1-235) months after ileostomy closure. IMM used were thiopurines (n=86), methotrexate (n=4), cyclosporine (n=2) and tacrolimus (n=1). IMM were used as monotherapy in 66 (71%) cases and were indicated as treatment of pouchitis (n=60, 65%), CDP (n=32, 34.4%) and cuffitis (n=1, 1%). Effectiveness was evaluated only for thiopurine monotherapy (n=62). After a median follow-up of 23 (1-234) months, clinical remission was achieved in 31%, clinical response in 31% and non-response in 38% (Figure 1). There were no differences in effectiveness between pouchitis and CDP (63.9% vs 57.7%, p= 0.62). Endoscopic response was evaluated in 19 (30.6%) cases. After a median of 9 months of follow-up median PDAI endoscopic subscore dropped from 3 (range 2-4) to 1 (range 0-3), (Figure 2). Adverse events related with treatment appeared in 28 patients (45%). Thiopurines were discontinued in 39 cases (63%) due to failure (17), toxicity (16) and long remission (6 cases). Conclusion In our cohort, thiopurines were used in 27% of patients with IDP, with long-term benefit (remission or response) in around two-thirds of them. This therapy could be one more option to manage these disorders.

Clinical Discrimination of Chronic Pouchitis After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

PurposeWe aimed to identify predictive factors for the development of chronic pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. MethodsThree hundred eighty-seven patients who underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for diagnosis of ulcerative colitis from January 2002 to March 2019 were included in this retrospective analysis. ResultsOf 115 patients with pouchitis, 40 patients exhibited acute pouchitis, and 75 patients exhibited chronic pouchitis. Of 75 patients with chronic pouchitis, 11 patients were diagnosed with chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis. Multivariate analysis revealed that early pouchitis onset and modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index score ≥ 7 were independent predictive factors for chronic pouchitis (p = 0.0004 and p = 0.029, respectively). Mean onset of pouchitis after intestinal continuity was significantly earlier in patients with chronic pouchitis than in patients with acute pouchitis (acute pouchitis vs. chronic pouchitis: 3.72±2.98 years vs. 1.85±2.40 years, p < 0.0001). Total modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index score was significantly higher in patients with chronic pouchitis than in patients with acute pouchitis (acute pouchitis vs. chronic pouchitis: 5.9±1.2 vs. 6.9 ± 1.6, p = 0.0020). ConclusionPatients with ulcerative colitis were more likely to develop chronic pouchitis if they exhibited early onset or severe disease activity at onset. Evaluation of both factors can aid in early treatment decisions to alleviate chronic pouchitis.

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Chronic Inflammatory Conditions of the Pouch.

Pouchitis can be a chronic complication of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) for chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis (CARP) and other inflammatory conditions of the pouch. This was a retrospective case series of adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and then developed CARP and received HBOT between January 2015 and October 2019. A modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (mPDAI) score was used to quantify subjective symptoms (0-6) and endoscopic findings (0-6) before and after HBOT. A total of 46 patients were included, with 23 (50.0%) being males with a mean age of 43.6 ± 12.9 years. The median number of HBOT sessions was 30 (range 10-60). There was a significant reduction in the mean mPDAI symptom subscore from 3.19 to 1.91 after HBOT (P < 0.05). The pre- and post-HBOT mean mPDAI endoscopy subscores for the afferent limb were 2.31 ± 1.84 and 0.85 ± 1.28 (P = 0.006); for the pouch body, 2.34 ± 1.37 and 1.29 ± 1.38 (P < 0.001); and for the cuff, 1.93 ± 1.11 and 0.63 ± 1.12 (P < 0.001), respectively. Transient side effects included ear barotrauma in 5 patients (10.9%) and hyperbaric myopic vision changes in 5 patients (10.9%). Despite minor adverse events, HBOT was well tolerated in patients with CARP and significantly improved symptoms and endoscopic parameters.

Outcome of biological therapies in chronic antibiotic‐refractory pouchitis: A retrospective single‐centre experience

In limited retrospective series, infliximab, adalimumab and vedolizumab have demonstrated efficacy in chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis. Here, we report single-centre data of all biological therapies in refractory pouchitis. We retrospectively assessed all records from patients with ulcerative colitis and ileal pouch -anal anastomosis who received infliximab, adalimumab or vedolizumab for pouchitis. Clinically relevant remission, defined as a modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index <5 and a reduction of modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index ≥2 points from baseline, was assessed at week 14. Thirty-three unique patients were identified. Prior to colectomy, patients had been exposed to cyclosporine (n = 14), infliximab (n = 12), adalimumab (n = 3), and/or vedolizumab (n = 3). All developed chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis, for which they received infliximab (n = 23), adalimumab (n = 13) or vedolizumab (n = 15). Clinically relevant remission was observed in 43.5% of patients in the infliximab group, and in 38.5% and 60.0% in the adalimumab and vedolizumab group, respectively. In the long-term, significantly more patients continued vedolizumab compared to anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy (hazard ratio 3.0, p = 0.04). Adverse events (mainly infusion reactions) explained 40.7% of the patients discontinuing anti-TNF therapy, whereas discontinuation of vedolizumab was only related to insufficient efficacy. Four patients eventually required a permanent ileostomy. In this case series of chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis, biological therapy was effective in the majority of patients and only a minority eventually required a permanent ileostomy. The use of anti-TNF agents was hampered by a high rate of adverse events, partly related to immunogenicity as some patients had been exposed to anti-TNF prior to colectomy. Vedolizumab was also efficacious and may provide a safe alternative in these chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis patients.

A Polymorphism in Interleukin-1β Gene Is Associated with the Development of Pouchitis in Japanese Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

Background: Major complications in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) include UC-associated cancer (UCAC) and postoperative pouchitis. We aimed to identify SNPs associated with UCAC/high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and pouchitis. Methods: Patients with UC who underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) with >2 years of follow-up after functioning pouches were included. Pouchoscopies were performed at least once to diagnose pouchitis according to the modified pouchitis disease activity index. SNP genotyping was performed for 8 SNPs reportedly associated with UCAC and pouchitis, namely: ELF1 (rs7329174), FCGR2A, (rs1801274), interleukin-1β (IL-1B; rs1143627), ITLN1 (rs2274910), MHC (rs7765379), TNFα (rs1799964), TNFSF15 (rs3810936), and UHMK1 (rs768910), using TaqMan genotyping technologies. We investigated the association of these SNPs with UCAC/HGD and pouchitis. Patients’ background data were retrospectively collected, including the presence of preoperative extraintestinal manifestation (EIM). Results: A total of 91 Japanese patients with UC were included. None of the 8 SNPs were associated with UCAC/HGD in our cohort. Multivariable analyses proved that the presence of preoperative EIM (hazard ratio [HR] 3.313, 95% CI 1.325–8.289) and IL-1B (rs1143627) TT genotype (HR 2.425, 95% CI 1.049–5.61) were independent predictive factors for the development of overall pouchitis. The presence of preoperative EIM (HR 3.977, 95% CI 1.292–12.24) and IL-1B (rs1143627 TT genotype; HR 3.382, 95% CI 1.101–10.39) were also independent predictive factors for the development of chronic pouchitis. Conclusions: The IL-1B (rs1143627) TT genotype and preoperative EIM were statistically significant predictors of pouchitis development after IPAA in patients with UC.

636 Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Is Effective in the Treatment of Inflammatory Disorders of the Ileal Pouch

INTRODUCTION: Inflammatory disorders of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) including chronic pouchitis, Crohn's Disease (CD) of the pouch and cuffitis are common and their management can be challenging. Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) has been used for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and CD; however, its use in pouchitis has not been systemically evaluated. The aim of our study was to assess the response to HBO therapy in patients with inflammatory diseases of the pouch. METHODS: In this retrospective case series, we included all patients above the age of 18, with history of IPAA and medically refractory pouchitis. HBO was executed with standard protocol with 2.4 to 3.0 PSI with a total of 30 sessions over 2 months. A modified Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (mPDAI) was used to quantify symptom and endoscopy sub-scores. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank test was used to compare the results. A P value of &lt; 0.05 was taken to be significant. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients were included in the study, 52.4% (n = 11) of these were males. The mean age of our sample was 40.4 ± 12.3 years. The indications of HBO were pouchitis (n = 18), fistulae (n = 9), surgical site/anastomotic ulcers (n = 7), active cuffitis (n = 6), ischemic ulcers (n = 4); most patients had more than one indication (Table 1). Thirteen patients (61.9%), reported subjective symptomatic improvement in stool frequency, bleeding, urgency and fevers. Of these, six patients (28.5%) reported complete remission of symptoms (Figure 1). Seventeen patients (80.9%) had endoscopic improvement. Among these 2 (10%) showed endoscopic remission (Figures 1 and 2). Of the 9 patients who had fistulae, 7 (77.8%) showed healing of the fistula tract. Overall, 19 (90.5%) patients had improvement in their mPDAI. Mean mPDAI of our cohort prior to therapy was 8.71. Of those who showed response, the mPDAI improved by a median of 3 (IQR 2-3) points. No side effects were seen in our cohort. The mean mPDAI was significantly better after HBO therapy (P &lt; 0.05). CONCLUSION: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy led to symptomatic and endoscopic improvement, as noted by the mPDAI, in majority of patients. Most patients with fistulae had significant endoscopic improvement.