Modified Mallampati Classification Research Articles

Magnitude, associated factors of difficult airway, and predictive value of airway examinations among maxillofacial surgery patients at public hospitals in Southern Ethiopia: a multicentre cross-sectional study

Background: “Difficult airway” is the clinical situation in which a conventionally trained anesthesiologist experiences difficulty with mask ventilation, laryngoscopy, and difficulty with tracheal intubation, or both. Associated factors and predictive value difficult airways, maxillofacial surgery study setup is under studied. Objective: To determine the magnitude and associated factors of difficult airways and predictive value of airway examinations among adult patients who underwent maxillofacial surgery at public hospitals in Southern Ethiopia 2022. Methods and materials: An institutional-based multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted among 250 maxillofacial patients from March to 30 June 2022 at selected hospitals. The data were entered into Epi_Data software version 4.3 and analyzed by STATA software version 14. All variables that were statistically significant in bivariate analysis, at the P less than 0.25, were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. The predictive value or the effectiveness of airway examinations in predicting difficult airways was analyzed by receiver operating curve. Results: In the current study, the magnitude of difficult airways was 21.2% (95% CI = 16.3–26.1%) and the magnitude of difficult intubation, difficult laryngoscopy, and difficult mask ventilation was 6.4% (95% CI 3.3–9.4%), 9.6% (95% CI 6.1–13%), and 13.6% (95% CI (9.1–16.8%), respectively. History of head and neck surgery adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=6.3, 95% CI (2.85–14.34), cervical collar AOR=4.9, 95% CI (1.96–12.49), and cervical spine injury AOR=2.4, 95% CI (1.07–5.38) were independently and significantly associated with difficulty of airway. Modified Mallampati class and sternomental distance were identified as good preoperative tests to predict difficult laryngoscopy, intubation, and mask ventilation. Conclusion and recommendation: The magnitude of difficult airways was maxillofacial surgery. Among various airway assessment tests, no single test was perfectly accurate. Anaesthesia professionals are recommended to use a combination of preoperative airway assessments.

Machine Learning Predictions and Identifying Key Predictors for Safer Intubation: A Study on Video Laryngoscopy Views.

This study develops a predictive model for video laryngoscopic views using advanced machine learning techniques, aiming to enhance airway management's efficiency and safety. A total of 212 participants were involved, with 169 in the training set and 43 in the test set. We assessed outcomes using the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score and considered factors like the modified Mallampati classification, thyromental height and distance, sternomental distance, mouth opening distance, and neck circumference. A range of machine learning algorithms was employed for data analysis, including Random Forest, Light Gradient Boosting Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, Support Vector Regression, Ridge Regression, and Lasso Regression. The models' performance was evaluated on the test set, with Root Mean Squared Error values ranging from 20.4 to 21.9. SHapley Additive exPlanations value analysis revealed that age is a consistent and significant predictor of POGO score across all models, highlighting its critical role in the predictive accuracy of these techniques.

Comparison of the modified Mallampati classification score versus the best visible Mallampati score in the prediction of difficult tracheal intubation: a single-centre prospective observational study.

The modified Mallampati classification is part of the preoperative airway risk assessment. Inconsistency in the way it is examined may contribute to heterogeneity in its diagnostic performance. The best visible Mallampati score could reduce interobserver heterogeneity but its diagnostic characteristics remain unknown. During preoperative anesthesia consultation of adult patients with a senior anesthesiologist, we compared the modified Mallampati classification score vs the best visible Mallampati score using cervical extension, tongue in, and phonation. The primary outcome was the diagnostic characteristic of the modified Mallampati classification score vs the best visible Mallampati score as predictors of difficult orotracheal intubation (more than two direct laryngoscopies or need for an alternate device). We performed a multivariable analysis to identify independent predictors of difficult orotracheal intubation in the tested cohort. Difficult orotracheal intubation occurred in 77/3,243 (2.4%) patients. A best visible Mallampati score was obtained in 1,596 (49.2%) patients. Sensitivity and specificity of the modified Mallampati classification score for predicting difficult orotracheal intubation were 0.56 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 to 0.66) and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.71), respectively. By comparison, the best visible Mallampati score was less sensitive (difference, -0.30; 95% CI, -0.19 to -0.30; P < 0.001) but more specific (difference, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.22 to -0.25; P < 0.001). In patients with difficult orotracheal intubation, 53% were incorrectly reclassified as low risk by the best visible Mallampati score. Compared with the modified Mallampati classification score, the best visible Mallampati score decreased sensitivity for predicting difficult orotracheal intubation and falsely classified half of the patients with difficult orotracheal intubation. Taking the risks associated with difficult airways into account, our findings indicate that a careful examination of the modified Mallampati classification is required during the global preoperative airway examination. ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02788253 ); 9 February 2016.

Screening and risk assessment for sleep-related breathing disorders in individuals living with spinal cord injury

ObjectivesThis research work was performed: (1) To assess the accessibility of in-laboratory polysomnography for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI); (2) to evaluate the validity of four screening questionnaires for sleep-related breathing disorders (SRBDs); and (3) to assess the association between anthropometric features and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). MethodsAn Environmental scan (E-scan) was performed in the province of Ontario, where all sleep clinics were invited to complete the E-scan survey. Furthermore, a cross-sectional study was performed at a rehabilitation hospital (Canada), where consecutive adults with subacute/chronic (>1 month) SCI were recruited. Using a home-based screening sleep test (HBSST), the validity of the Berlin, STOP, Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale [MOS-SS], and STOP-Bang screening questionnaires was assessed. The association between AHI and three features (i.e., neck circumference, body mass index [BMI] and oropharynx opening as assessed using the Modified Mallampati classification [MMC]) was evaluated. ResultsAccording to the E-scan, access to polysomnography is limited for the SCI population in Ontario. Of the 28 participants with SCI (11 females, 17 males; mean age: 54.9 years) included in the cross-sectional study, 32.1 % were diagnosed with moderate-to-severe SRBD. The performance of the questionnaires was considered insufficient for screening of individuals living with SCI. AHI was not associated with neck circumference, BMI, or MMC. ConclusionsThose results suggest that the use of a HBSST could overcome the barriers for individuals with SCI to access diagnostic testing of SRBDs. The use of screening questionnaires and risk assessment for SRBDs in the SCI population is unreliable.

Anticipation of Difficult Airway by Neck Circumference to Thyromental Distance Ratio

INTRODUCTIONUnanticipated difficult intubation scenario is a major concern for anaesthetists which contributes to perioperative morbidity and mortality. Characteristics of difficult intubation indices like increased neck circumference (NC) and reduced thyromental distance (TM) when combined as a ratio can increase accuracy in predicting difficult intubation. MATERIAL AND METHODSThis prospective, observational study was conducted at Universal College of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital on 160 patients of ASA class I and II planned for surgery under general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Airway indices measured were modified mallampati classification (MM), thyromental distance, neck circumference, and neck circumference to thyromental distance ratio (NC/TM). RESULTSNC/TM showed the highest sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV in the non-obese group (p &lt;0.001) as compared to MM, NC and TM. In the obese group, NC/TM showed the highest sensitivity, PPV and NPV (p &lt;0.001) as compared to NC and TM while the specificity was highest and similar to MM as compared to NC and TM. CONCLUSIONNeck circumference to thyromental distance ratio is a better predictor of anticipating difficult intubation in both obese and non-obese patients compared to modified mallampati classification, thyromental distance and neck circumference.

Comparison Of Outcome Between Conventional And Video Laryngoscope In Predicted Difficult Intubation

Background: Endotracheal intubation is the mainstay of airway management in general anaesthesia. Failure to intubate the trachea, often known as difficult intubation, is always a possibility. To overcome difficult intubation, different methods of instrumental support were developed. Some authors. Methods: From March 2018 to September 2019, a comparative cross-sectional study was conducted at BSMMU, Dhaka in the department of anesthesia, analgesia, and intensive care medicine. A total of 60 patients with predicted difficult intubation who were scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation were selected for the study. Prediction of difficult intubation was assessed by modified Mallampati class III and IV or thyromental height. Results: Time taken from visualization of glottis for insertion of ETT was 12.8±2.3 sec in conventional laryngoscope which was significantly lower in video laryngoscope (15.0±3.6) (p =0.006). Time taken to visualize the glottis was 13.2±1.7 sec in conventional laryngoscope and 13.2±4.0 sec in video laryngoscope (p&gt;0.05). Total time for tracheal intubation was 49.0±6.4 sec in conventional laryngoscope and 53.2±9.9 sec in video laryngoscope (p&gt;0.05). Intubation with first attempt by video laryngoscope was (30/30; 100%) as compared with conventional laryngoscope (27/30; 90%) (p&gt;0.05). Conclusion: It is evident from the study that intubation with video laryngoscope in comparison to conventional laryngoscope might provide better outcome in terms of ease of intubation and number of attempts during intubation for patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia. Bangladesh Armed Forces Med J Vol 56 No (1) June 2023, pp 7-13

Screening of aspiration pneumonia using the modified Mallampati classification tool in older adults.

Pneumonia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in older adults. In the aging society, screening methods for predicting aspiration pneumonia are crucial for its prevention. Changes in the oropharyngeal morphology and hyoid bone position may increase the risk of aspiration pneumonia. This multicenter study aimed to investigate a simple and effective screening method for predicting dysphagia and aspiration pneumonia. Overall, 191 older adults (aged 65 years or older) were randomly sampled using the simple random sampling technique. Oropharyngeal morphology was assessed using the modified Mallampati classification, which reflects the size of the tongue in the oropharyngeal cavity. The hyoid position was measured as the distance between the menton and laryngeal prominence to evaluate aging-related changes in the muscles of the laryngopharynx. Dysphagia was assessed using the repetitive saliva swallowing test (RSST), which measures the number of swallowing movements in 30 seconds; dysphasia is defined as less than 3 swallowing movements in 30 seconds. The aspiration signs were assessed based on history of choking or coughing reflex during eating or drinking and medical history of pneumonia. The study findings revealed that the modified Mallampati classification was significantly correlated with a medical history of pneumonia. A higher incidence of pneumonia was evident in the lower Mallampati classification, which shows the smaller size of the tongue base in the oropharyngeal cavity. The results of this study suggest that the modified Mallampati classification may be a possible screening method to predict the occurrence of pneumonia.

Comparison of Modified Mallampati Classification in Supine and Sitting Positions to Predict Difficult Tracheal Intubation in Diabetic Patients.

Airway management of patients with long-standing diabetes poses a major challenge for anaesthesiologists due to stiff joint syndrome affecting the atlanto-occipital joint. In certain cases requiring immobilization, the Mallampati test must often be performed in the supine position for obvious reasons. Hence, we determined the diagnostic precision (sensitivity and specificity) of the modified Mallampati test in sitting and supine positions among the diabetic population in predicting difficult tracheal intubation. A single-center prospective observational study on adult diabetic patients undergoing general anesthesia and orotracheal intubation was carried out. An observer recorded the modified Mallampati in the sitting posture during the pre-anesthetic examination. The Mallampati in the supine position was determined while in the operating room, and the difficulty of intubation was noted, and diagnostic precision was calculated. The main objective was to predict a difficult airway by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Out of the 150 participants, Mallampati grading in a sitting position was correctly able to identify 42.5% of difficult intubation cases, whereas it was 97.5% with Mallampati in the supine position. Mallampati grading in the sitting position was able to correctly identify 89.1% of easy intubation cases, which was 63.6% with Mallampati in the supine position. The correlation of Mallampati in the supine position with CL grading was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Among diabetic patients, the modified Mallampati test in the supine position can be considered a more accurate and sensitive predictor of difficult intubation than the sitting posture.

The use of DryShield versus rubber dam isolation systems among pediatric patients with different airway patency: A randomized clinical trial

ObjectivesThis randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the impact of DryShield isolation (DSI) and rubber dam isolation (RDI) system usage on vital signs, behavior, pain and discomfort, and chairside time required among children with different airway patencies based on the Modified Mallampati Classification (MMC). Material and methodsHealthy, cooperative children who required fissure sealant in at least two contralateral, fully erupted, permanent first molars were included. Airway patency was determined by two trained and calibrated dentists using the MMC. The participants were categorized based on their MMC scores into patent airways (classes I and II) and non-patent airways (classes III and IV). The dental procedure was videotaped during treatment, and vital signs, including arterial oxygen saturation, heart rate, and blood pressure, were recorded every 3 min. The participants’ subjective pain and discomfort were evaluated using a previously validated Arabic interview questionnaire and a validated Arabic version of the Wong–Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale. The participants’ behavior and behavioral pain were evaluated utilizing the Frankl Behavior Scale and the face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability scales, respectively. ResultsThere were no significant differences in any of the vital signs between DSI and RDI. DSI use yielded a significant reduction in chairside time (P < 0.001) and was more bothersome (P < 0.001) than RDI use among all participants, regardless of airway patency. DSI was associated with significantly better behavior during the dental procedure (P = 0.002) and less behavioral pain (P < 0.001) among all participants, regardless of airway patency. ConclusionIrrespective of airway patency, DSI outperformed RDI in terms of behavior, pain, and procedure duration; however, DSI was characterized by noise, pressure on soft tissues, and an increased tendency to induce gag reflexes.

Assessment of Different Indices as Predictors of Difficult Airway in Obese Patients.

Introduction Difficulties with tracheal intubation contribute to the morbidity and mortality associated with anesthesia. Suggested predictors for difficult airwayinclude, history of obstructive sleep apnea, high Mallampati score, elderly, male, short neck, and high Wilson score.However, none of these has high diagnostic accuracy particularly in obese population. Parameters used to quantify obesity such as Body Mass Index(BMI), mid arm circumference, skin fold thickness,etc. have not been used as independent predictors of difficult airway. This study has been designed to evaluate the accuracy of commonly used tools to assess difficult airway and to test other obesity markers as scale for assessing difficult airway i.e. Bag mask ventilation grade ≥3 or Cormack-Lehane Grade≥3 on Direct Laryngoscopy or number of intubation attempts ≥3. Aim To assess BMI, Mallampati grading, Neck circumference and Thyromental distance as predictors of difficult airway in obese patients and to validate neck circumference to thyromental distance ratio and skin fold thickness as a tool for assessment of difficult airway (Bag mask ventilation grade ≥3 or Cormack-Lehane Grade≥3 on Direct Laryngoscopy or number of intubation attempts ≥3.) in obese patients. Methods This prospective observational study was carried out on 51 obese patients (as per BMI) of ASA gradeII, either sex, aged 23 to 57 years posted for elective surgery under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. After subjective assessment of difficult airway following data sets and variables were obtained - sex, weight, height, body mass index (BMI),Modified Mallampati class (MPG), Cormack-Lehane (CL) grade, adequacy of bag mask ventilation (BMV), number of endotracheal intubation attempts, patient's neck circumference (NC), thyromental distance (TMD), waist-hip ratio (WHR) and Skin fold thickness. The observations made during the study were statistically analyzed and correlated as predictors for difficult airway. Result Correlation of MPG to CL-grade (r-0.41, p-0.003), BMV (r-0.31, p-0.028) & No. of intubationattempts (r-0.37, p-0.007) was mild & statistically significant. Correlation of Neck Circumference with CL-grade (r-0.57, p-0.000), & No. of intubation attempts (r-0.62, p-0.000), found moderate & statistically significant, & with BMV was mild and statistically significant (r-0.48, p-0.000). Correlation of Thyromental Distance to CL-grade (r-0.65, p-0.000), BMV (r-0.70, p-0.000) & No. of intubationattempts (r-0.61, p-0.000) was moderate & statistically significant. Correlation of BMI to CL-grade (r-0.11, p-0.428), BMV (r-0.04, p-0.757) & No. of intubation attempts (r-0.16, p-0.257) was weak & not significant. Skin Fold Thickness showed no significant association with Difficult airway i.e., CL Grade (p-0.478), BMV (p-0.101), and No. of intubation attempts (p-0.143). Correlation of NC/TMD ratio with BMV (r-0.74, p-0.000), CL-grade (r-0.76, p-0.000), & No. of intubation attempts (r-0.77, p-0.000) wasmoderate & statistically significant. Conclusion NC, TMDand NC/TMD Ratio depicted a close association with airway difficulty in obese patients. Obesity grade is a risk factor for difficult airway but predictors of obesity including Skin Fold Thickness, individually did not showassociation with difficult airway (small sample size may be a limiting factor). None of the commonly performed tests alone has proven to be adequate in predicting difficult intubation in the obese population.

Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy and/or intubation among morbidly obese patients: Upper lip bite test versus modified Mallampati classification.

We aim to compare the upper lip bite test with the modified Mallampati test as predictors of difficult laryngoscopy and/or difficult intubation among morbidly obese patients. A total of 500 morbidly obese patients (body mass index > 40 kg/m2) undergoing general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation are included in this prospective single-blinded observational clinical study. The preoperative airway assessment is obtained by the modified Mallampati test and upper lip bite test. The difficulty of laryngoscopy is assessed by an experienced anaesthetist in patients adequately anaesthetised and fully relaxed. The view is classified according to Cormack and Lehane's classification. Modified Mallampati test III or IV and upper lip bite test III are considered positive tests. Difficult laryngoscopy is defined as Cormack and Lehane's classification III and IV, whereas difficult endotracheal intubation is defined as an intubation difficulty scale ⩾ 5. The incidences of Cormack and Lehane's classification III and IV and intubation difficulty scale ⩾ 5 are 9.4% and 11.8% respectively. The specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy are higher with the upper lip bite test. The combination of the upper lip bite test and the modified Mallampati test improved these measures. The likelihood ratio + was significantly higher for the upper lip bite test (6.35 and 9.47) than for the modified Mallampati test (3.21 and 3.16). The upper lip bite test is a test with high sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and accuracy making it a favourable test for identifying easy and difficult intubations and laryngoscopies in morbidly obese patients.

Assessment of Preoperative Predictors for Difficult Laryngeal Exposure in Endolaryngeal Surgery.

The proper visualisation of the larynx is required for the diagnostic assessment and therapeutic intervention. The most significant challenges for surgeon is to visualise the anterior commissure of the glottis region. The aim of this study is to record the preoperative laryngoscore in patients posted for endolaryngeal surgery and to assess preoperative predictors for intraoperative difficult laryngeal exposure by correlating with preoperative laryngoscore. Prospective, Cross-sectional, Observational study. Department of Otorhinolaryngology in a tertiary care teaching facility. 150 patients were included with an endolaryngeal disease who were planned for surgery with age > 18yrs. In 150 subjects preoperative laryngoscore was calculated, which comprised 11 parameters including thyromental distance, mandibular prognathism, macroglossia, micrognathia, trismus, inter incisor gap, degree of neck flexion-extension, history of prior open-neck surgery or radiotherapy, upper jaw dental status, modified Mallampati score and body mass index in order to produce a total score out of a possible maximum score of 17. According to the anterior commissure visualisation all patients were categorised into five classes, ranging from class 0 to class IV during surgery. The laryngoscore parameters were assessed and compared statistically with five classes of intraoperative anterior commissure visualisation. Out of 150 patients 70 (46.6%) were having 3-4 laryngoscore, followed by 45 (30%) patients with 5-6 laryngoscore. Total 123 (82%) patient had class 0,1 and 2 intraoperative anterior commissure visualisation while 27 (18%) had class 3 and 4 visualisation. If laryngoscore was either less or equal to 5, 90% of the patients had excellent laryngeal exposure whereas only 10% of the patients had challenging laryngeal exposure. At univariate analysis, thyromental distance, degree of neck flexion/extension, and modified Mallampati classification were found statistically significant for difficulty of anterior commissure visualisation independently. A sound, easy and valid preoperative laryngoscore may be significantly helpful in identifying intraoperative difficult laryngeal exposure. This may prevent inadequacy of surgery, abandon of surgery, intra operative complication, and medico-legal cases for laryngologist.

Poster (Health Services, Economics and Policy Change) ID 1969166

Background We studied the feasibility of a home-based screening sleep test (HBSST), the validity of four questionnaires used to screen for sleep-related breathing disorders (SRBDs), and the potential association between SRBD and clinical features in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods Adults with subacute/chronic (&amp;gt;1 month post-injury) SCI were recruited for the cross-sectional study and qualitative analysis. Feasibility of the HBSST was objectively evaluated and participants shared their experience. We also examined the validity of the Berlin, STOP, Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale [MOS-SS], and STOP-Bang screening questionnaires. We investigated the association between the degree of SRBD and three features (i.e., neck circumference, body mass index [BMI] and oropharynx opening as assessed using the Modified Mallampati classification [MMC]). Results There were 13 females and 18 males with ages varying from 20 to 86 years (mean age: 54.7 years) with motor complete (n=8) or incomplete SCI at cervical (n=21) or thoraco-lumbar levels. Time since SCI varied from 1.5 to 474 months. Overall, 28 individuals completed the HBSST and endorsed its feasibility. Mean apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was 17.3 events/hour (range: 0.5-83.7). AHI was significantly correlated with Berlin (p=0.036) and STOP-Bang scores (p=0.009). There was no significant correlation between AHI and MOS-SS (p=0.348) or STOP (p=0.165). AHI was not associated with neck circumference (p=0.614), BMI (p=0.958), or MMC (p=0.335). Conclusions Our results suggest that HBSST is a feasible screening method, and Berlin and STOP-Bang are valid screening questionnaires for the SCI population. AHI was not correlated with BMI, neck circumference, or MMC.

Frequency tongue coating in patients referred to Kerman Dental School and its relationship with relative factors

ObjectiveThere has been shown a relationship between “tongue coating” and “Simplified Oral Health Index, periodontal status, modified mallampati classification (MMC) of the oropharynx and oral malodor”. The purpose of this study is to assess the frequency of tongue coating and relative factors (sex, age, smoking, systemic disease and oral health indices) among patients referred to Dental School of Kerman University.MethodsIn this cross sectional study 250 patients referred to dental school of Kerman university of medical sciences were examined. The data collection form was included demographic data (gender, age, history of systemic disease and smoking) and Oral health indices such as TCI (Tongue coating index), OHI-S (Simplified Oral Hygiene Index), MGI (Modified Gingival Index), MMC and lost teeth. The analysis have been done using SPSS21, T-test, Pearson correlation coefficient and linear regression analysis (significance level was set at less than 0.05).ResultsTongue coating has been shown in 96% of patients with the mean percent of 45.83 ± 19.16%. Men had higher percent of TCI though it was not statistically significant. Smoking was the strongest determinant factor in people with higher TCI scores (P = 0.013). There was a positive significant correlation between OHI-S and TCI [(Pearson’s coefficient(r) = 0.134, P = 0.034)].ConclusionTCI appears to be related to smoking and Simplified Oral Health Index. The evaluation of tongue coating is necessary to assess its impact on oral health status and also to motivate patients to clean their tongue as a part of their oral health care routine.

Comparison of Upper Lip Bite Test and Modified Mallampati Classification as Predictor of Difficult Intubation in Patients for Surgery under General Anaesthesia

Comparison of Upper Lip Bite Test and Modified Mallampati Classification as Predictor of Difficult Intubation in Patients for Surgery under General Anaesthesia

Retrospective Investigation of Difficult Airway Cases Encountered in Bursa Uludag˘ University Medical Faculty Operating Room.

Ensuring airway patency and proper management of ventilation by anticipating difficulties that can occur in airway control are vital in preventing anaesthesia-related complications. We aimed to determine the role of preoperative assessment findings in difficult airway management. In this study, critical incident records of difficult airway patients between 2010 and 2020 in the operating room of Bursa Uludag˘ University Medical Faculty were retrospectively analysed. A total of 613 patients, whose records were fully accessible, were grouped as paediatric (under 18 years old) and adult (18 years and over). The success rate for maintaining an airway in all patients was 98.7%. Pathological situations which cause difficult airways were head and neck region malignancies in adult patients and congenital syndromes in paediatric patients. Anatomical reasons that cause difficult airway were anterior larynx (31.1%) and short muscular neck (29.7%) in adult patients and small chin (38.0%) in paediatric patients. A significant statistical relationship was found between difficult mask ventilation and increased body mass index, male gender, modified Mallampati class 3-4, and thyromental distance <6 cm (P = .001, P < .001, P < .001, and P < .001, respectively). The correlation of Cormack-Lehane grading with modified Mallampati classification, upper lip bite test, and mouth opening distance was statistically significant (P < .001, P < .001, and P < .001, respectively). In male patients with increased body mass index, modified Mallampati test class of 3-4 and thyromental distance of < 6 cm should suggest the possibility of difficult mask ventilation. In modified Mallampati classification and upper lip bite tests, the possibility of difficult laryngoscopy should be considered as class increases and mouth opening distance becomes shorter. Preoperative assessment, including a good history taken from the patient and a complete physical examination, is crucial to provide solutions for difficult airway management.

Evaluation of changes in Mallampati class in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgeries in the prone position: A prospective observational study.

Positioning of patients during surgery, whether prone or head down, can lead to airway edema which, in turn, may lead to a difficult airway, and enhanced chances for reintubation. We aimed to assess and evaluate modified Mallampati class (MMC) change in patients scheduled for lumbar spine surgery in the prone position. This prospective observational study included 80 patients scheduled for lumbar spine surgery. The MMC was assessed up to 48 h postoperatively. The time taken by the patients in the postoperative period for MMC class to revert to preoperative value and airway complications, if any, was noted. Other parameters observed were surgical duration, intraoperative fluids used, and blood loss to look for any significant correlation with changes in MMC. MMC increase by one grade was observed in 73 patients (91%). MMC in 54 patients (74%) returned to baseline within 18 h, in 12 patients (16%) it took 24 h, and in the remaining 7 patients (10%) the time taken was 36 h. It was concluded and established by this study that the MMC declined by one grade and reverted to baseline value within 36 h. This change in MMC necessitates extra caution to be adopted during the postoperative period as surgery in a prone position may predispose to an increased risk of encountering difficult reintubation. The change in MMC was not significantly correlated to intraoperative variables like duration of surgery, amount of intraoperative fluid given, and blood loss.

Comparison of Modified Mallampati Classification and Thyromental Height to Predict Difficult Intubation

Introduction: Difficult intubation is an emergency situation that an anaesthetist come across frequently. It is a frequent cause of mortality in practice of anesthesia. Mallampati classification (MPC) of the oropharyngeal structures is a simple test to assess anticipated difficult airway for endotracheal intubation. thyromental height (TMH) test is now also commonly used to predict difficult intubation. Objective: To evaluate diagnostic accuracy of modified mallampati classification and thyromental height using Cormack and Lehane's classification of laryngoscopy as a gold standard. Study Design: Descriptive cross sectional validation study. Setting: Department of Anaesthesia, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi. Duration: 20-Sep-2021 to 19-Mar-2022. Material and Methods: A total number of 1035 were included in this study. Pre-operatively modified Mallampati test (MMT) and TMH test was performed. Mallampati class III and IV were considered difficult. While TMH height &gt;50 mm was considered as difficult intubation. Difficult intubation equipment’s was ready, i.e. stylet, boogie, LMA, I-gel. General anaesthesia was induced in the operating room after collecting baseline vital signs. After three minutes, a skilled anesthesiologist performed a laryngoscopy while the patient was sniffing. To validate the diagnosis of difficult intubation, the laryngeal view was appraised using a modified Cormack and Lehane (C-L) grading system. Results: Mean age of patients was 40.16±12.19 years. Mean height of patients was 152.94±8.32 cm, mean weight was 65.01±13.59 Kg and Mean body mass index (BMI) was 27.78±5.64 kg/m2. There were 768 (74.20%) males and 267 (25.80%) females. TMH was 77.8% sensitive, 94.6% specific having 70.0% PPV, 96.3% NPV and 92.27% accuracy. On diagnostic accuracy of MMP taking difficult intubation according to standard as gold standard, MMP was 92.4% sensitive, 90.1% specific having 60.2% PPV, 98.6% NPV and 90.3% accuracy. Practical implications: Thyromental Height (TMH) needs more broad usage in multiple settings to be validated as a single most important predictor of difficult laryngoscopy. It will thus be used widely all over the country rendering fewer complications for the patients. Conclusion: TMH was the test that was most sensitive and accurate at foretelling difficult laryngoscopy when compared to the modified Mallampati score. TMH has potential as a single anatomical metric to predict the possibility of a difficult laryngoscopy. Keywords: Mallampati classification, thyromental height, Cormack and Lehane's classification, laryngoscopy.

Comparison of Airway Assessment with Modified Mallampati Classification in Supine and Upright Positions in Predicting Difficult Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Prospective Observational Study

Comparison of Airway Assessment with Modified Mallampati Classification in Supine and Upright Positions in Predicting Difficult Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Prospective Observational Study

Comparison of modified mallampati classification with Cormack and Lehane grading in predicting difficult laryngoscopy among elective surgical patients who took general anesthesia in Werabie comprehensive specialized hospital - Cross sectional study. Ethiopia, 2021

BackgroundDifficult laryngoscopy/intubation can cause a multitude of issues, including hypoxia, brain damage, and even death if not addressed swiftly. The Modified Mallampati test (MMT) is frequently used to predict difficult airway in patients with no clear difficult airway signal, despite its limited predictive power, in patients with no obvious difficult airway signal. Cormack and Lehane grading (CLG) is the gold standard, however it is not utilized before anesthesia. ObjectiveTo compare modified Mallampati classification (MMC) with Cormack and Lehane grading in predicting difficult laryngoscopy among patients who took general anesthesia. MethodAn institutionally based cross sectional survey study of 141 elective surgical patients with no obvious difficult airway sign was conducted from February to April 2021. The correlation between MMC and CLG was computed using spearman's correlation coefficient, and the area under the curve (AUC) for MMT was assessed using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis. ResultThe incidence of difficult laryngoscopy and intubation, respectively, was 14.9% and 9.2%. The Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ) was 0.330, with a significance level of 0.001. The AUCs for difficult laryngoscopy and intubation, respectively, were 0.705 and 0.726. MMT had 47.6% sensitivity and 93.3% specificity for difficult laryngoscopy and 53.8% and 91.4% specificity for difficult intubation, respectively. Conclusionand Recommendation: There was little correlation between MMC and CLG. MMT sensitivity was similarly low. As a result, as part of the screening test for difficult airway, extra clinical tests are required.