Modified Intent-to-treat Research Articles

Efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-based bismuth quadruple therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: A large-scale, real-world study.

Vonoprazan (VPZ) has been shown to have superior acid-inhibitory effects compared to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). However, there is a paucity of research examining the efficacy of vonoprazan-based bismuth quadruple therapy (VBQT) in the eradication of primary Helicobacter pylori infection. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of VBQT as a first-line treatment for H pylori eradication. This retrospective, real-world, single-arm study included consecutive treatment-naive patients who received VBQT (VPZ 20 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, bismuth potassium citrate 220 mg, all administered twice daily for 14 days) for H pylori eradication between March 1, 2021, and May 30, 2023. The study included both outpatients and inpatients. Eradication rates were assessed using 13C-urea breath tests or 14C-urea breath tests performed 4 to 6 weeks after treatment. The primary outcomes included eradication rates, adverse events, and treatment compliance. A total of 612 H pylori-infected patients were included in the study. The intention-to-treat (ITT), modified ITT (MITT), and per-protocol analyses showed H pylori eradication rates of 84.3% (95% CI: 812% to 87.1%), 95.9% (95% CI: 93.9% to 97.4%), and 96.4% (95% CI: 94.4% to 97.8%), respectively. In the ITT analysis, the adverse event rate was 12.7%, and the treatment compliance rate was 96.9%. In real-world practice, the VBQT regimen demonstrates excellent efficacy and favorable tolerability as a first-line therapy for H pylori eradication.

Role of MIC levels and 23S rRNA mutation sites to clarithromycin in 14-day clarithromycin bismuth quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A prospective trial in Beijing

BackgroundRising clarithromycin resistance undermines Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) treatment efficacy. We aimed to determine clarithromycin's minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) levels and identify specific mutation sites in the 23S ribosomal subunit (23S rRNA) that predict treatment outcomes in a 14-day regimen of clarithromycin bismuth quadruple therapy (amoxicillin 1g, clarithromycin 500 mg, rabeprazole 10 mg, and colloidal bismuth pectin 200 mg). Materials and methodsWe included adult H. pylori patients who hadn't previously undergone clarithromycin-based treatment, either as initial or rescue therapy. Exclusions were made for penicillin allergy, recent use of related medications, severe illnesses, or inability to cooperate. Patients underwent a 14-day clarithromycin bismuth quadruple therapy. Gastric mucosa specimens were obtained during endoscopy before eradication. MIC against amoxicillin and clarithromycin was determined using the E-test method. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve helped to find the optimal clarithromycin resistance MIC breakpoint. Genetic sequences of H. pylori 23S rRNA were identified through Sanger Sequencing. (ChiCTR2200061476) ResultsOut of 196 patients recruited, 92 met the inclusion criteria for the per-protocol (PP) population. The overall intention-to-treat (ITT) eradication rate was 80.00 % (84/105), while the modified intention-to-treat (MITT) and PP eradication rates were 90.32 % (84/93) and 91.30 % (84/92) respectively. No amoxicillin resistance was observed, but clarithromycin resistance rates were 36.19 % (38/105), 35.48 % (33/93), and 34.78 % (33/92) in the ITT, MITT, and PP populations respectively. Compared with the traditional clarithromycin resistance breakpoint of 0.25 μg/mL, a MIC threshold of 12 μg/mL predicted better eradication. Among 173 mutations on 152 sites in the 23S rRNA gene, only the 2143A > G mutation could predict eradication outcomes (p < 0.000). ConclusionsInterpretation of elevated MIC values is crucial in susceptibility testing, rather than a binary "susceptible" or "resistant" classification. The 2143A > G mutation has limited specificity in predicting eradication outcomes, necessitating further investigation into additional mutation sites associated with clarithromycin resistance.

Efficacy and safety of omadacycline for treating complicated skin and soft tissue infections: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

In the present study, we aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of omadacycline (OMC) with its comparators for the treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs) in adult patients. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating OMC for cSSTIs were searched in databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Clinical Trial, up to July 2022. The primary outcomes were clinical efficacy and microbiological response, with secondary outcome was safety. Four RCTs consisting of 1,757 patients were included, with linezolid (LZD) as a comparator drug. For clinical efficacy, OMC was not inferior to LZD in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) (OR: 1.24, 95% Cl: [0.93, 1.66], P = 0.15) and clinically evaluable (CE) populations (OR: 1.92, 95% Cl: [0.94, 3.92], P = 0.07). For microbiological response, OMC was numerically higher than LZD in the microbiologically evaluable (ME) (OR: 1.74, 95% Cl: [0.81, 3.74], P = 0.16) and microbiological MITT (micro-MITT) populations (OR: 1.27, 95% Cl: [0.92, 1.76], P = 0.14). No significant difference was found in subpopulations of monomicrobial or polymicrobial mixed infection populations. The mortality and adverse event rates were similar between OMC and LZD. OMC was as good as LZD in terms of clinical efficacy and microbiological response, and has similar safety issues in treating cSSTIs. OMC might be a promising option for treating cSSTIs in adult patients.

Vonoprazan-Amoxicillin Dual Therapy With Different Amoxicillin Administration Regimens for Helicobacter pylori Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

The effect of preprandial or postprandial administration of amoxicillin on the efficacy of vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy (VA-dual therapy) for Helicobacter pylori treatment has not been studied. It is also unclear whether amoxicillin dosing four times daily is more effective than three times daily. We aimed to investigate the effect of different amoxicillin administration regimens on the efficacy of VA-dual therapy. H. pylori-infected subjects were randomly assigned to three groups in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive a 14-day dual therapy consisting of vonoprazan 20 mg twice daily + amoxicillin 1000 mg three times daily before meals (BM-TID) or 1000 mg three times daily after meals (AM-TID) or 750 mg four times daily after meals (AM-QID). H. pylori eradication rates, adverse events rates, compliance, and antibiotic resistance were compared. Between May 2021 to April 2023, 327 subjects were enrolled. The eradication rates of BM-TID, AM-TID, and AM-QID dual therapy were 88.1%, 89.9%, and 93.6% in intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, 90.6%, 94.2%, and 99.0% in modified ITT (MITT) analysis, and 90.4%, 94.1%, and 99.0% in per-protocol (PP) analysis. Although there was non-inferiority between BM-TID and AM-TID, as well as between AM-TID and AM-QID, AM-QID was significantly more effective than BM-TID. There were no significant differences in adverse event rates, compliance, and antibiotic resistance among the three groups. Postprandial administration and the increased frequency of administration of amoxicillin may contribute to a better efficacy of VA-dual therapy, especially for rescue therapy. All VA-dual therapy in our study could achieve good efficacy for first-line treatment. clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05901051.

Molnupiravir for intra-household prevention of COVID-19: The MOVe-AHEAD randomized, placebo-controlled trial

To evaluatethe efficacy and safety of molnupiravir for intra-household post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) of COVID-19. MOVe-AHEAD was a randomized, controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial comparing molnupiravir (800mg twice daily for 5 days) with placebo. Eligible participants were adult, unvaccinated, asymptomatic household contacts of patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. The primary efficacy endpoint was the incidence of COVID-19 through day 14 in modified intention-to-treat (MITT) participants (those who received ≥1 dose of study intervention) without detectable SARS-CoV-2 at baseline, termed the MITT-VN population. Superiority of molnupiravir was prespecified as a stratified one-sided p-value of <0.0249 for the treatment difference in this endpoint. The MITT population comprised 763 participants randomized to molnupiravir and 764 to placebo; 83.6% had anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at baseline. In the MITT-VN population, COVID-19 rates through day 14 were 6.5% with molnupiravir and 8.5% with placebo (one-sided p-value: 0.0848). In the molnupiravir arm, 25/35 of confirmed COVID-19 events (71.4%) occurred after completion of treatment (versus 17/49 [34.7%] for placebo). Adverse event rates were low and similar between molnupiravir and placebo. Molnupiravir was well-tolerated but did not meet the prespecified superiority criterion, possibly influenced in part by the high pre-existing immunity in the trial population.

P-032 Ide-cel versus standard regimens in patients with triple-class–exposed (TCE) relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): a KarMMa-3 analysis in the modified intention to-treat (mITT) population

P-032 Ide-cel versus standard regimens in patients with triple-class–exposed (TCE) relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): a KarMMa-3 analysis in the modified intention to-treat (mITT) population

A day-to-day management model improves patient compliance to treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection: a prospective, randomized controlled study

BackgroundThe day-to-day (DTD) management model encourages patients to actively participate in their healthcare by setting goals. We determined the effectiveness of the DTD model in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, as compared with conventional outpatient education (OE).MethodsWe randomized 254 H. pylori-positive patients into a DTD group (127 patients) and an OE group (127 patients) prior to primary treatment with 14-day bismuth-containing quadruple therapy, including esomeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin. Both groups received consistent medication instructions. Patients in the DTD group recorded daily attendance after completing their daily medication plan from day 1 to day 14. The medication compliance, follow-up compliance, H. pylori eradication rates, and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated.ResultsIn the modified intention-to-treat (MITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses, the DTD group showed significantly higher medication compliance than the OE group (P = 0.001 and P = 0.031, respectively). Both the MITT and PP analyses showed significant differences in follow-up compliance (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively) and timing of the review urea breath test (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively) between the two groups. However, no significant differences were observed in the H. pylori eradication rates (95.8% vs. 93.8%, P = 0.529) in the PP analysis, or AEs incidence (25.4% vs. 28.3%, P = 0.603) between the two groups.ConclusionThis study demonstrated the novel application of the DTD model in the treatment of H. pylori infection, which enabled patients to develop habitual medication-taking behaviors without physician intervention.

Safety and Efficacy of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Plus Metronidazole Versus Meropenem From a Phase 2, Randomized Clinical Trial in Pediatric Participants With Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection.

Ceftolozane/tazobactam, a cephalosporin-β-lactamase inhibitor combination, is approved for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI). The safety and efficacy of ceftolozane/tazobactam in pediatric participants with cIAI were assessed. This phase 2 study (NCT03217136) randomized participants to either ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole or meropenem for treatment of cIAI in pediatric participants (<18 years). The primary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of intravenous ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole. Clinical cure at end of treatment (EOT) and test of cure (TOC) visits were secondary end points. The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population included 91 participants (ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole, n = 70; meropenem, n = 21). Complicated appendicitis was the most common diagnosis (93.4%); Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen (65.9%). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 80.0% and 61.9% of participants receiving ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole and meropenem, drug-related AEs occurred in 18.6% and 14.3% and serious AEs occurred in 11.4% and 0% of participants receiving ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole and meropenem, respectively. No drug-related serious AEs or discontinuations due to drug-related AEs occurred. Rates of the clinical cure for ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole and meropenem at EOT were 80.0% and 95.2% (difference: -14.3; 95% confidence interval: -26.67 to 4.93) and at TOC were 80.0% and 100.0% (difference: -19.1; 95% confidence interval: -30.18 to -2.89), respectively; 6 of the 14 clinical failures for ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole at TOC were indeterminate responses imputed as failures per protocol. Ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole was well tolerated in pediatric participants with cIAI and had a safety profile similar to the established safety profile in adults. In this descriptive efficacy analysis, ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole appeared efficacious.

Efficacy and Safety of Plazomicin in the Treatment of Enterobacterales Infections: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BackgroundIn the present study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of plazomicin with comparators for the treatment of Enterobacterales infections.MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing plazomicin for Enterobacterales infections were searched on the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Meta-analyses were used to evaluate the efficacy and safety in RCTs.ResultsA total of 3 RCTs consisting of 761 patients were included in the present analysis. The study population included complex urinary tract infections (cUTIs), bloodstream infections (BSIs), and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP). Plazomicin had a clinical remission rate in the modified intention-to-treat (MITT) population that was similar to that of comparators (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% CI, 0.60–1.73; I2 = 45%) in the pooled analysis of the 3 studies. The overall microbiologic eradication rate in the microbiological MITT (mMITT) population was similar to that of the comparators group (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 0.72–2.95; I2 = 0%). However, the microbiologic recurrence rate of plazomicin for Enterobacterales was lower than that in the comparators group (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17–0.86; P = .02; I2 = 0%). No significant differences were found between plazomicin and comparators for the risk of any adverse events (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.55–1.11; I2 = 0%).ConclusionsPlazomicin is as good as comparators in terms of efficacy and tolerance in the treatment of Enterobacterales infections. Therefore, plazomicin is a suitable choice for antibiotic treatment in adult patients with cUTIs, BSIs, or HAP.

Prospective, randomized, controlled, noninferiority clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of absorbable macroporous polysaccharide composites as adjunct to hemostasis during open surgery.

To address intraoperative bleeding in cardiac surgery, reducing blood transfusion requirements, is mandatory to achieve effective hemostasis. Hemostatic agents may limit localized persistent bleeding. The introduction of carboxymethyl-chitosan component into the hemostatic agent and the application of the radiation crosslinking technique maintain its capacity for achieving intraoperative hemostasis, thus increasing the clinical utility. A prospective, noninferiority and randomized controlled clinical trial to compare the safety and efficacy of absorbable macroporous polysaccharide composites (AMPC, treatment group) with compound microporous polysaccharide hemostatic powder (CMPHP, control group) (2:1 ratio) as adjuncts to hemostasis in open surgery. The main indication was used for hemostasis in various traumatic hemorrhage areas, including cardiothoracic, vascular, and general surgery. The primary endpoint was success rate of hemostasis within 300 s (at a 10% noninferiority margin). The secondary endpoint was hemostasis time. Both endpoints were assessed in the modified intention-to-treat (MITT) population. Safety parameters were assessed. This study is fully compliant with theCONSORT statement. Randomized patients in AMPC and CMPHP groups were 168 and 84, respectively. In MITT population, the success rates of hemostasis within 300 s were 98.8% (163 of 165) in AMPC and 94.0% (78 of 83) in CMPHP (treatment difference 4.8% [95% CI -0.57% to 10.20%]). AMPC was thus noninferior to CMPHP. Hemostasis time (median [interquartile range]) with AMPC (87 [52.5, 180] s) was better than CMPHP (110 [54.5, 181] s). Changes in laboratory parameters over time and shifts to abnormal values were typical of surgeries and similar between two groups. No noticeable adverse effects associated with AMPC or CMPHP were observed. AMPC is well tolerated as topical hemostatic agent, noninferior to commercial CMPHP, and exhibits excellent safety. This study provides a novel hemostatic agent which appears to offer significant clinical advantage in various hemorrhage areas.

Efficacy and safety of high-dose esomeprazole and amoxicillin dual therapy versus bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection: a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial.

A high-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-amoxicillin dual therapy has been investigated for treatment of patients with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. Currently, the efficacy of this dual therapy remains inconclusive, with controversial findings from various single-center clinical trials. To assess the efficacy and safety of high-dose dual therapy (HDDT) compared with the bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) in treatment-naive patients with H. pylori infection. A multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial. Three hundred and forty treatment-naïve patients with H. pylori infection were prospectively recruited from seven participating hospitals. The enrolled patients were randomized into one of two treatment groups: the HDDT group (esomeprazole, 20 mg four times daily; amoxicillin, 750 mg four times daily) and the BQT group (esomeprazole, 20 mg, twice daily; bismuth potassium citrate, 600 mg, twice daily; amoxicillin, 1 g, twice daily; metronidazole, 400 mg, four times daily). The primary outcome was eradication rate, and secondary outcomes were safety and patient compliance. The eradication rates in the HDDT group versus the BQT group were 86.47% versus 87.06% on intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, 91.88% versus 92.50% on modified ITT (MITT) analysis, and 91.77% versus 93.04% on per-protocol (PP) analysis, with no significant differences between the two groups. The patient compliance rates in the HDDT group versus the BQT group were 97.02% versus 95.86%, and no significant difference was found between the two groups. Notably, the HDDT group exhibited significantly lower incidence in the drug-induced adverse events (AEs) compared to the BQT group (16.67% versus 47.94%). HDDT is equally efficacious in eradicating H. pylori infection and resulted in good patient compliance and safety compared with BQT. These findings provide evidence in support of HDDT as a first-line treatment for H. pylori infection. This clinical trial was registered at The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (trial registration number: ChiCTR2000039096).

1154. Safety and Efficacy of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Plus Metronidazole Versus Meropenem in Pediatric Participants With Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection: A Phase 2, Randomized Clinical Trial

BackgroundCeftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), a cephalosporin–β-lactamase inhibitor combination, is approved for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI), and nosocomial pneumonia in adults. Safety and efficacy of C/T in pediatric participants with cIAI was assessed.MethodsThis phase 2 study (NCT03217136) compared C/T + metronidazole (MTZ) with meropenem (MEM) for treatment of cIAI. Age- and weight-adjusted dosing is summarized in Table 1. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of C/T + MTZ compared with MEM. A key secondary endpoint was clinical cure at end of treatment (EOT) and test of cure (TOC).Table 1. Summary of Dosing and Pharmacokinetic Sampling Schedule by Age Cohort ResultsA total of 94 participants were randomized 3:1; 91 were treated with C/T + MTZ (n=70) or MEM (n=21) comprising the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population. The clinically evaluable population included 78 participants at EOT (C/T + MTZ, n=59; MEM, n=19) and 77 participants at TOC (C/T + MTZ, n=58; MEM, n=19). The most common diagnosis and pathogen in the MITT population were complicated appendicitis (C/T + MTZ, 91.4%; MEM, 100%) and Escherichia coli (C/T + MTZ, 67.1%; MEM, 61.9%). The mean (SD) intravenous therapy/overall treatment duration was 6.4 (2.8)/9.3 (3.6) days and 5.8 (1.8)/9.0 (3.2) days for C/T + MTZ and MEM, respectively. In total, ≥1 adverse events (AE) occurred in 80.0% and 61.9% of participants receiving C/T + MTZ and MEM, respectively (Table 2), of which 18.6% and 14.3% were considered drug related. Serious AE occurred in 11.4% (8/70) and 0% (0/21) of participants receiving C/T + MTZ and MEM, respectively; none were considered drug related. No drug-related study drug discontinuations occurred. In the MITT population, rates of clinical cure for C/T + MTZ and MEM at EOT were 80.0% and 95.2%, and at TOC were 80.0% and 100%, respectively (Figure 1); 6 of the 14 failures for C/T + MTZ were indeterminate responses scored as endpoint failures per protocol. In the clinically evaluable (CE) population, rates of clinical cure for C/T + MTZ and MEM were 89.8% and 100% at EOT, and 89.7% and 100% at TOC, respectively (Figure 1). ConclusionC/T + MTZ was well tolerated in pediatric participants with cIAI, and rates of clinical success were high with C/T treatment. C/T is a promising new treatment option for children with cIAI.Disclosures Carl-Christian A. Jackson, MD, Merck & Co. Inc. (Shareholder) Julia Lonchar, MSc, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (Employee, Shareholder) Feng-Hsiu Su, MPH, MBA, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (Employee, Shareholder) Jennifer A. Huntington, PharmD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee) Mekki Bensaci, PhD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee) Myra W. Popejoy, PharmD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (Employee) Matthew G. Johnson, MD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee) Carisa S. De Anda, PharmD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (Employee, Shareholder) Elizabeth G. Rhee, MD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp (Employee, Shareholder) Christopher Bruno, MD, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (Employee)

Short-Term Outcomes of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Single-Center, Open-Label, Non-Inferiority, Randomized Clinical Trial.

ObjectiveTo date, well-designed randomized controlled trials examining the safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for colorectal cancer are scarce. The aim of the current study was to compare short-term outcomes of SILS for colorectal cancer with conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS).MethodsBetween June 28, 2017, and June 29, 2019, a single-center, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital (North), Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine in Shanghai, China. In total, 200 patients diagnosed or suspected of colorectal cancer (cT1–4aN0–2M0) were randomly assigned to either the SILS or CLS group in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was early morbidity rate. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative outcomes, pain intensity, postoperative recovery, pathologic outcomes, and long-term outcomes.ResultsIn total, 193 participants (SILS, 97; CLS, 96) were analyzed in the modified intention-to-treat (MITT) population. Among them, 48 underwent right hemicolectomy (SILS n = 23, 23.7% and MLS n = 25, 26%), 15 underwent left hemicolectomy (SILS n = 6, 6.2% and MLS n = 9, 9.4%), 1 underwent transverse colectomy (MLS n = 1, 1%), 57 underwent sigmoidectomy (SILS n = 32, 33% and MLS n = 25, 26%), and 72 underwent anterior resection (SILS n = 36, 37.1% and MLS n = 36, 37.5%). No significant differences were observed in the baseline characteristics. The intraoperative complication was comparable between the two groups [5 (5.2%) vs. 4 (4.2%); difference, 1%; 95% CI, −5.8% to 7.8%; p > 0.999) and so was postoperative complication rates [10 (10.3%) vs. 14 (14.6%); difference, −4.3%; 95% CI, −13.9% to 5.3%; p = 0.392]. The SILS group showed shorter incision length [median (IQR), 4 (3.5–5) vs. 6.6 (6–7.5), p < 0.001] and lower VAS scores on the first [median (IQR), 4 (3–5) vs. 4 (4–5), p = 0.002] and the second day [median (IQR), 2 (1.5–3) vs. 3 (2–4), p < 0.001] after surgery. No statistically significant difference was found in other measured outcomes.ConclusionsCompared with CLS, SILS performed by experienced surgeons for selected colorectal cancer patients is non-inferior with good short-term safety and has the advantage of reducing postoperative pain.Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03151733.

Posaconazole for prevention of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill influenza patients (POSA-FLU): a randomised, open-label, proof-of-concept trial.

PurposeInfluenza-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (IAPA) is a frequent complication in critically ill influenza patients, associated with significant mortality. We investigated whether antifungal prophylaxis reduces the incidence of IAPA.MethodsWe compared 7 days of intravenous posaconazole (POS) prophylaxis with no prophylaxis (standard-of-care only, SOC) in a randomised, open-label, proof-of-concept trial in patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) with respiratory failure due to influenza (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03378479). Adult patients with PCR-confirmed influenza were block randomised (1:1) within 10 days of symptoms onset and 48 h of ICU admission. The primary endpoint was the incidence of IAPA during ICU stay in patients who did not have IAPA within 48 h of ICU admission (modified intention-to-treat (MITT) population).ResultsEighty-eight critically ill influenza patients were randomly allocated to POS or SOC. IAPA occurred in 21 cases (24%), the majority of which (71%, 15/21) were diagnosed within 48 h of ICU admission, excluding them from the MITT population. The incidence of IAPA was not significantly reduced in the POS arm (5.4%, 2/37) compared with SOC (11.1%, 4/36; between-group difference 5.7%; 95% CI − 10.8 to 21.7; p = 0.32). ICU mortality of early IAPA was high (53%), despite rapid antifungal treatment.ConclusionThe higher than expected incidence of early IAPA precludes any definite conclusion on POS prophylaxis. High mortality of early IAPA, despite timely antifungal therapy, indicates that alternative management strategies are required. After 48 h, still 11% of patients developed IAPA. As these could benefit from prophylaxis, differentiated strategies are likely needed to manage IAPA in the ICU.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00134-021-06431-0.

A phase 2 study of talimogene laherparepvec, nivolumab, and trabectedin (TNT) in advanced sarcoma.

11567 Background: Combination trabectidin (T) and nivolumab (N) has been shown to be a safe and effective therapy in soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Intratumoral injection of talimogene laherparepvec (TVEC) has a local oncolytic effect, and increases immune response via enhanced recruitment of antigen presenting cells, and thereby cytotoxic immune response. This study aims to determine if the addition of TVEC to combination trabectedin and nivolumab is effective and safe in advanced sarcoma. Methods: Eligible patients include patients ≥ 18 years of age with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic STS, measurable disease by RECIST v1.1, and at least one accessible tumor for TVEC intratumoral injection. N (3 mg/kg i.v. q 2 weeks), T (1.2 mg/m2 i.v. q 3 weeks) and TVEC (1x10e8 PFU/ml q 2 weeks depending on tumor size) were administered. A test dose of TVEC (1x10e6 PFU/ml) was initially given, followed three weeks later by full dose TVEC. Primary endpoint: Progression-free survival (PFS); Secondary endpoints: (1) Best overall response during treatment period, (2) PFS rate at 6 and 9 months, (3) Overall survival (OS) rate at 6, 9, and 12 months, (4) Incidence of conversion from unresectable to resectable tumor, and (5) Incidence of treatment-related adverse events. Interim. Results: There were 36 evaluable subjects under the Modified Intention-to-Treat (MITT) population, having completed the first cycle of TNT and a CT or MRI scan at the 6-week follow-up period. The most common histological subtypes include leiomyosarcoma (9), liposarcoma (5), spindle cell sarcoma (3), pleomorphic sarcoma (2), Ewing’s sarcoma (2), and other (5). Median number of prior lines of therapy was 4 (range 1-8). Best Overall Response by RECIST v1.1 = 3 PR, 27 SD, 5 PD. One patient, with previously unresectable disease was taken for resection and was found to have 100% necrosis on surgical pathology. Disease control rate (CR+PR+SD) was 86.1%. The median PFS was 5.5 (range: 1-18) months; 6-month PFS rate: 62.1%. Median PFS on therapy immediately preceding this trial was 2.0 months (range = 1-14 months). There were 47 evaluable subjects for OS analysis under the Intention-to-Treat (ITT) population having received at least one dose of T and N. The median OS was 9.0 (range 0-20) months; 6-month OS rate: 73%. Safety analysis: There were 47 evaluable subjects under the ITT population. 28% of these patients experienced ³1 SAE. The most common grade 3/4 TRAEs include anemia (12), increased ALT (8), fatigue (4), thrombocytopenia (4), neutropenia (4). There were no grade 3/4 TVEC injection site reactions. 22% of patients in the MITT cohort remain on study. Conclusions: These results suggest that combination therapy with TNT appears to be as effective as standard therapy, with no new safety signals seen. Furthermore, median PFS exceeded that of the immediately preceding lines of therapy in this heavily pre-treated cohort. As data matures, further data will be reported. Clinical trial information: NCT03886311.

Pre-Emptive Incision-Site Infiltration with Ropivacaine Plus Dexamethasone for Postoperative Pain After Supratentorial Craniotomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

BackgroundIncision-site infiltration with local anesthetics prevents pain on incision site, but pain relief is limited to the first few postoperative hours. Dexamethasone as an adjuvant to local infiltration successfully achieves better postoperative pain relief; however, this has not been studied in craniotomy patients yet.Study Design and MethodsThis is a prospective, single-center, blinded, randomized, controlled trial included patients aged between 18 and 64 years, ASA physical status of I–II, scheduled for elective supratentorial tumor craniotomy under general anesthesia. We screened patients for enrollment from April 4, 2019 through August 15, 2019. The final study visit of the last patient was conducted on February 13, 2020. We randomly assigned eligible participants (1:1) to either the dexamethasone group who received incision-site infiltration of 0.5% ropivacaine plus 0.033% dexamethasone (N=70) or the control group who received 0.5% ropivacaine alone (N=70). Primary outcome was the cumulative sufentanil consumption (μg) within 48 hours postoperatively. Primary analysis was performed based on the modified intention-to-treat (MITT) principle.ResultsBaseline characteristics were similar between the groups (p>0.05). Sufentanil consumption during the first 48 hours postoperatively was 29.0 (10.7) μg in the dexamethasone group and 38.3 (13.7) μg in the control group (mean difference −9.3, 95% CI −13.4 to −5.1; p<0.001). There was no serious adverse effect directly associated with incision-site infiltration or local dexamethasone use.ConclusionThe addition of dexamethasone to pre-emptive incision-site infiltration with the local anesthetic can reduce about 27% of opioids consumption and the postoperative pain scores within 72 hours after craniotomy.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.Gov (NCT03618264).

1230. Clinical and Microbiologic Outcomes by Causative Pathogen in Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia (HABP/VABP) Treated with Imipenem/Cilastatin (IMI)/Relebactam (REL) Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam (PIP/TAZ)

BackgroundIMI/REL is a combination of IMI and the novel class A and class C β-lactamase inhibitor REL. Here we present per-pathogen outcomes from a recent phase 3 clinical trial (RESTORE-IMI 2), in which IMI/REL was shown to be non-inferior to piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP/TAZ) for empiric therapy of HABP/VABP, in both primary and key secondary endpoints.MethodsRandomized, controlled, double-blind, multinational, phase 3, non-inferiority trial in adults with HABP/VABP. Lower respiratory tract specimens were obtained ≤48 hours prior to screening. Participants (pts) were randomized 1:1 to IMI/REL 500 mg/250 mg or PIP/TAZ 4 g/500 mg, given intravenously every 6 h for 7-14 d. Pts also received empiric linezolid until baseline cultures confirmed absence of MRSA. This analysis evaluated outcomes by causative LRT pathogen in modified intent to treat (MITT) pts (randomized pts with ≥1 dose of study drug, excluding pts with only gram-positive cocci present on baseline Gram stain) who had ≥1 baseline LRT pathogen susceptible (according to CLSI criteria) to both study drugs. Outcomes assessed were microbiologic response at end of therapy (EOT), clinical response at early follow-up (EFU; 7-14 d after EOT), and Day 28 all-cause mortality (ACM).ResultsOf 531 MITT pts, 51.4% (130 IMI/REL, 143 PIP/TAZ) had ≥1 baseline LRT pathogen susceptible to both study drugs. The most common causative pathogens in this analysis population were Klebsiella spp (30.4% of patients), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (22.3%), Escherichia coli (22.0%), and Haemophilus influenzae (9.2%), consistent with other recent trials in HABP/VABP and with surveillance data. Outcomes by pathogen were generally comparable between IMI/REL and PIP/TAZ (Table). In a separate subgroup analysis of the microbiologic MITT population, in pts with ≥1 ESBL-positive LRT pathogen (45 IMI/REL, 35 PIP/TAZ), microbiologic response at EOT was 82.2% (IMI/REL) vs 68.6%% (PIP/TAZ), clinical response at EFU was 64.4% vs 60.0%, and Day 28 ACM was 20.0% and 22.9%, respectively. In the IMI/REL arm, 8 pts had ≥1 confirmed KPC-positive baseline LRT pathogen; KPC status was not assessed in the PIP/TAZ arm.ConclusionIMI/REL is an efficacious treatment option for HABP/VABP, regardless of causative pathogen.Table. Primary and secondary efficacy outcomes in patients who were in the MITT population and had at least 1 baseline LRT pathogen susceptible to both study drugs DisclosuresMaria C. Losada, BA, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Jiejun Du, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Michelle L. Brown, BS, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Katherine Young, MS, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder)Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Robert Tipping, MS, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) C. Andrew DeRyke, PharmD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Joan R. Butterton, MD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Amanda Paschke, MD MSCE, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Luke F. Chen, MBBS MPH MBA FRACP FSHEA FIDSA, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder)Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder)

1460. Imipenem/Cilastatin (IMI)/Relebactam (REL) in Hospital-Acquired/Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia (HABP/VABP): Subgroup Analyses of Critically Ill Patients in the RESTORE-IMI 2 Trial

BackgroundHABP/VABP are serious infections associated with high mortality. Critically ill patients (pts) are at particularly high risk of adverse clinical outcomes. In the RESTORE-IMI 2 trial, IMI/REL was non-inferior to PIP/TAZ in primary and key secondary endpoints. We evaluated outcomes specifically in critically ill pts, according to several definitions, from that trial.MethodsRandomized, controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial in adult pts with HABP/VABP. Lower respiratory tract (LRT) specimens were obtained ≤48 hours prior to screening. Pts were randomized 1:1 to IMI/REL 500 mg/250 mg or PIP/TAZ 4 g/500 mg, given IV every 6 h for 7-14 d. The primary endpoint was Day 28 all-cause mortality (ACM) and the key secondary endpoint was clinical response at early follow-up (EFU; 7-14 d after completing therapy) in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population (randomized pts with ≥1 dose of study drug, excluding pts with only gram-positive cocci present on baseline Gram stain). This analysis assessed efficacy outcomes specifically in pts in the ICU and in pts with APACHE II score ≥15, both prespecified subgroups. In post-hoc analyses, outcomes were also specifically assessed in the subgroups of pts with moderate/severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 60 mL/min) and pts who received vasopressors.ResultsOf MITT pts (n=531) at baseline, 66.1% (175 IMI/REL, 176 PIP/TAZ) were in the ICU, 47.5% (125 IMI/REL, 127 PIP/TAZ) had APACHE-II score ≥15, and 24.7% (71 IMI/REL, 60 PIP/TAZ) had moderate/severe renal impairment. Further, 20.9% (54 IMI/REL, 57 PIP/TAZ) received vasopressors within 72 h of first dose of study drug and/or during the study. In each subgroup, baseline demographics, clinical characteristics, and causative LRT pathogens (mostly Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, and A. calcoaceticus-baumannii complex) were generally comparable between treatment arms. In pts with APACHE-II score ≥15, Day 28 ACM and clinical response rates with IMI/REL were favorable compared to PIP/TAZ (Table). Day 28 ACM was also favorable with IMI/REL in patients receiving vasopressors. Remaining outcomes were similar between treatment arms.ConclusionIMI/REL is an efficacious treatment option for critically ill pts with HABP/VABP.Table. Primary and key secondary efficacy outcomes by subgroup (MITT population) DisclosuresLuke F. Chen, MBBS MPH MBA FRACP FSHEA FIDSA, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder)Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Maria C. Losada, BA, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Kathryn A. Mahoney, PharmD, Merck (Employee, Shareholder) Jiejun Du, PhD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Michelle L. Brown, BS, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Robert Tipping, MS, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Katherine Young, MS, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder)Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) C. Andrew DeRyke, PharmD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Joan R. Butterton, MD, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Amanda Paschke, MD MSCE, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder)

Investigation of the efficacy of the short regimen for rifampicin-resistant TB from the STREAM trial

BackgroundThe STREAM trial demonstrated that a 9–11-month “short” regimen had non-inferior efficacy and comparable safety to a 20+ month “long” regimen for the treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis. Imbalance in the components of the composite primary outcome merited further investigation.MethodsFirstly, the STREAM primary outcomes were mapped to alternatives in current use, including WHO programmatic outcome definitions and other recently proposed modifications for programmatic or research purposes. Secondly, the outcomes were re-classified according to the likelihood that it was a Failure or Relapse (FoR) event on a 5-point Likert scale: Definite, Probable, Possible, Unlikely, and Highly Unlikely. Sensitivity analyses were employed to explore the impact of informative censoring. The protocol-defined modified intention-to-treat (MITT) analysis population was used for all analyses.ResultsCure on the short regimen ranged from 75.1 to 84.2% across five alternative outcomes. However, between-regimens results did not exceed 1.3% in favor of the long regimen (95% CI upper bound 10.1%), similar to the primary efficacy results from the trial. Considering only Definite or Probable FoR events, there was weak evidence of a higher risk of FoR in the short regimen, HR 2.19 (95%CI 0.90, 5.35), p = 0.076; considering only Definite FoR events, the evidence was stronger, HR 3.53 (95%CI 1.05, 11.87), p = 0.030.Cumulative number of grade 3–4 AEs was the strongest predictor of censoring. Considering a larger effect of informative censoring attenuated treatment differences, although 95% CI were very wide.ConclusionFive alternative outcome definitions gave similar overall results. The risk of failure or relapse (FoR) may be higher in the short regimen than in the long regimen, highlighting the importance of how loss to follow-up and other censoring is accounted for in analyses. The outcome of time to FoR should be considered as a primary outcome for future drug-sensitive and drug-resistant TB treatment trials, provided sensitivity analyses exploring the impact of departures from independent censoring are also included.

Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes Among Patients with Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: Analysis of the Phase 3 COVERS Randomized Trial of Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam.

AimExploratory analyses evaluated patient characteristics and outcomes among patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infection (cSSTI) in the phase 3 COVERS study who were admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU).MethodsAdults with cSSTI (surface area ≥ 75 cm2) and evidence of systemic inflammation and/or underlying comorbidities were randomized 2:1 to intravenous ceftaroline fosamil (600 mg every 8 h [q8h]) or vancomycin (15 mg/kg every 12 h) plus aztreonam (1 g q8h) for 5–14 days. Clinical response and ICU length of stay (LOS) within first hospitalization were evaluated in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) and clinically evaluable (CE) populations; a Cox proportional hazards model identified factors associated with increased hospital LOS.ResultsOverall, 42 of 761 randomized patients were admitted to the ICU (ceftaroline fosamil, n = 32; vancomycin plus aztreonam, n = 10) prior to, or at start of, study treatment. Baseline differences between the ICU and non-ICU populations were indicative of more severe disease in ICU patients; within this subset, there were also some notable imbalances between treatment groups. Clinical cure rates at test-of-cure (ceftaroline fosamil vs. vancomycin plus aztreonam) were generally similar in the non-ICU and ICU subsets (MITT population 79% vs. 79% and 69% vs. 90.0%, respectively; CE population 87% vs. 85% and 80% vs. 89%, respectively). Median ICU LOS was 8 vs. 13 days, respectively. ICU admission was a risk factor predicting increased hospital LOS (P < 0.001).ConclusionsClinical outcomes for patients admitted to the ICU were generally similar to non-ICU patients, despite more severe baseline disease, with shorter median treatment duration in the ceftaroline fosamil group. ICU admission was associated with longer hospital LOS. Given the small sample size and unbalanced patient and disease characteristics within the ICU subgroup, differences between treatment groups should be interpreted with caution.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01499277.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s40121-020-00297-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.