Modification Of Diet In Renal Disease Study Equation Research Articles

An Endorsement of the Removal of Race From GFR Estimation Equations: A Position Statement From the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative

An Endorsement of the Removal of Race From GFR Estimation Equations: A Position Statement From the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative

Evaluation of Long-Term Kidney Function Following Orthotopic Heart Transplantation

Acute impairment of kidney function in patients with heart failure and heart transplantation is a frequent condition. However, the impact of the transplant on long-term kidney function remains controversial. This study describes a cohort of patients who received a heart transplant in a reference hospital between 2005 and 2019. Glomerular filtration rate during follow-up was calculated at 0, 6,12, 24, and 60 months using the Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD (modification of diet in renal disease study) equations. To identify changes we compared glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at baseline with measurements over time after heart transplantation, using a paired t test and a longitudinal model of Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE). Forty-four patients were included. The mean of baseline GFR was 67.9 ± 1.3 mL/min. A triple immunosuppressive therapy scheme was used with cyclosporine/tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroid, with progressive dose reduction. After adjusting for multiple variables, we found no reduction of GFR over time with the GEE model. There was no significant difference in GFR using Cockcroft-Gault equation at 6 (mean difference [MD] 4.46; confidence interval [CI] -2.1 to 11.09; P=0.18), 12 (MD 1.65, CI -4.5 to 7.82; P=0.59), 36 (MD 0.69; CI -6.04 to 7.43; P=0.83), and 60 months (MD 0.62; CI -5.5 to 6.79; P=0.83). Similar findings were found using MDRD equation. There is no significant GFR decline between the time of heart transplantation and a follow-up at 60 months. New studies are needed to evaluate changes in renal function beyond this timeframe.

The Performance of Equations That Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate against Measured Urinary Creatinine Clearance in Critically Ill Patients.

The performance of glomerular filtration rate- (GFR-) estimating equations was studied against creatinine clearance measured by 24-hour urine collection (CrCl24h-urine) in critically ill patients. Methods. In this substudy of the PermiT trial (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ISRCTN68144998), patients from King Abdulaziz Medical City-Riyadh who had CrCl24h-urine were included. We estimated GFR using Cockroft–Gault (CG), modification of diet in renal disease study (MDRD), chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI), and Jelliffe equations. For the CG equation, we entered the actual weight in one calculation (CGactual-wt), and if BMI ≥30 kg/m2, we entered the ideal body weight (CGideal-wt) and the adjusted body weight (CGadjusted-wt) in two calculations. We calculated the MDRD equation based on 4 (MDRD-4) and 6 variables (MDRD-6). The performance of these equations was assessed by different ways including Spearman correlation, bias (difference between estimated GFR and CrCl24h-urine), precision (standard deviation of bias), and Bland–Altman plot analysis. Results. The cohort consisted of 237 patients (age 45 ± 20 years, males 75%, mechanically ventilated 99% with serum creatinine 101 ± 94 µmol/L and CrCl24h-urine 108 ± 69 ml/min/1.73 m2). The correlations between the different equations and CrCl24h-urine were modest (r: 0.62 to 0.79; p < 0.0001). Bias was statistically significant for CGactual-wt (21 ml/min), CGadjusted-wt (12 ml/min), and MDRD-6 (-10 ml/min) equations. Precision ranged from 46 to 54 ml/min. The sensitivity of equations to correctly classify CrCl24h-urine 30–59.9 ml/min/1.73 m2 was 17.2% for CGactual-wt, 30.0% for CGideal-wt, 31.0% for CGadjusted-wt, 31.0% for MDRD-4, 39.1% for MDRD-6, 13.8% for CKD-EPI, and 34.5% for Jelliffe equation. Conclusions. Commonly used GFR-estimating equations had limited ability to properly estimate CrCl24h-urine and to correctly classify GFR into clinically relevant ranges that usually determine dosing of medications.

A Novel Creatinine-Based Equation to Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate in Chinese Population With Chronic Kidney Disease: Implications for DOACs Dosing in Atrial Fibrillation Patients

Background: Over/under-estimating renal function may increase inappropriate dosing strategy associated adverse outcomes; however, previously reported equations to estimate renal function have limited accuracy in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Consequently, we intended to develop a novel equation to precisely estimate renal function and subsequently guide clinical treatment for CKD patients. Methods: A novel approach, Xiangya-s equation, to estimate renal function for CKD patients was derived by linear regression analysis and validated in 1885 patients with measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 by renal dynamic imaging at three representative hospitals in China, with the performance evaluated by accuracy, bias and precision. In the meanwhile, 2,165 atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who initiated direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) between December 2015 and December 2018 were identified and renal function was assessed by estimated creatinine clearance (eCrCl). Events per 100 patient-years was calculated. Cox proportional hazards regression was applied to compare the incidence of outcomes of each group. Results: Xiangya-s equation demonstrated higher accuracy, lower bias and improved precision when compared with 12 creatinine-based and 2 CysC-based reported equations to estimate GFR in multi-ethnic Chinese CKD patients. When we applied Xiangya-s equation to patients with AF and CKD prescribed DOACs, wide variability was discovered in eCrCl calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault (CG), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study (MDRD), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), Xiangya equation which we had developed for generally patients and Xiangya-s equations, which persisted after grouping by different renal function stages. Equation choice affected drug-dosing adjustments, with the formulas agreeing for only 1.19%, 5.52%, 33.22%, 26.32%, and 36.61% of potentially impacted patients for eCrCl cutoffs of <15, <30, 15–49, 30–49, ≥50 ml/min, respectively. Relative to CG equation, accordance in DOACs dosage was 81.08%, 88.54%, 62.25%, and 47.68% for MDRD, CKD-EPI, Xiangya and Xiangya-s equations for patients with CrCl < 50 ml/min (eCrCl cutoffs of <30, 30–49, ≥50 ml/min), respectively. Reclassification of renal function stages by Xiangya-s equation was significantly associated with stroke or systemic embolism, non-major clinically relevant bleeding and any bleeding events. Conclusion: Xiangya-s equation provides more accurate GFR estimates in Chinese CKD patients who need consecutive monitoring of renal function, which may assist clinicians in choosing appropriate drug dosages.

Comparison of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration Equations for Detection of Cardiovascular Risk: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study.

ObjectivesThe study aimed to compare the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study (MDRD) and the Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations for the detection of cardiovascular risk.MethodsData of 9,970 Tehranian participants aged ≥ 20 years were analyzed. The prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD), its risk factors, and 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk were compared across the categories of glomerular filtration rate based on the MDRD and CKD-EPI equations. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) was defined as the estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 according to each equation.ResultsThe prevalence of CKD weighted to the 2016 Tehranian urban population was 11.0% (95% confidence interval: 10.3 - 11.6) and 9.7% (9.1 - 10.2) according to the MDRD and CKD-EPI equations, respectively. Besides, 8.3% and 1.5% of the participants with CKDMDRD and non-CKDMDRD were reclassified to non-CKDCKD-EPI and CKDCKD-EPI categories, respectively. Participants with CKDCKD-EPI but without CKDMDRD were more likely to be male and older, and more frequently had diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and CVD, when compared to those without CKD according to both equations; they were also more likely to be male, older, and smokers, and had less dyslipidemia and more CVD, when compared to those with CKD by using both equations. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, compared to CKDMDRD, the odds of CKDCKD-EPI were significantly higher for older age and lower for the female gender.ConclusionsCompared to MDRD, the CKD-EPI equation provides more appropriate detection of cardiovascular risk, which is caused by the reclassification of older individuals and fewer females into lower eGFR categories.

Comparative Performance of Creatinine-Based GFR Estimation Equations in Exceptional Longevity: The Rugao Longevity and Ageing Study.

PurposeReduced kidney function has been associated with an increased risk for adverse outcomes. Accurate assessment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is key to diagnosis and management of kidney disfunction. Debate exists on the best GFR estimation equation for elderly people. This study aimed to compare the predictive validity and discriminative ability of four GFR equations in relation to 2-year and 6-year mortality in exceptional longevity (EL) (those over 95 years old with intact health) individuals and is an ideal model to address factors relating to life span and age-related diseases.Patients and MethodsThis study used 6 years’ data of 278 EL from the Rugao longevity cohort. Baseline GFR was estimated using four equations: Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study (MDRD) equation, Berlin Initiative Study-1 (BIS) equation, and modified MDRD equation. Predictive validity was tested using Cox proportional hazards analysis. Overall improvement in reclassification based on estimated GFR (eGFR) was assessed applying net reclassification improvement (NRI).ResultsMean age of participants was 97±2 years with median follow-up of 2.6 years. Median (IQR) eGFR by CKD-EPI, MDRD, BIS, and modified MDRD equations were 73.9 (62.2–77.6), 82.3 (67.4–98.6), 56.4 (47.9–63.9), and 101.5 (83.1–121.6) mL/min per 1.73 m2, respectively. Higher eGFREPI was associated with lower mortality after multivariate adjustment (for continuous eGFREPI, HRtwo-year 1.018, 95% CI 1.002–1.033, P=0.023; HRsix-year 1.013, 95% CI 1.002–1.025, P=0.022), while eGFR from other equations did not show any associations with mortality. NRI for two-year mortality was 0.14 and approximately significant, which may favor the CKD-EPI when compared to BIS equation (P=0.052).ConclusionThe CKD-EPI equation showed more accurate estimation of kidney function in the elderly with respect to GFR distribution and predictability of mortality risk.

Agreement and Precision Analyses of Various Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Formulae in Cancer Patients

The accuracy of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in cancer patients is very important for dose adjustments of anti-malignancy drugs to reduce toxicities and enhance therapeutic outcomes. Therefore, the performance of eGFR equations, including their bias, precision, and accuracy, was explored in patients with varying stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) who needed anti-cancer drugs. The reference glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was assessed by the 99mTc-diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (99mTc-DTPA) plasma clearance method in 320 patients and compared with the GFRs estimated by i) the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, ii) the unadjusted for body surface area (BSA) CKD-EPI equation, iii) the re-expressed Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation with the Thai racial factor, iv) the Thai eGFR equation, developed in CKD patients, v) the 2012 CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C, vi) the Cockcroft-Gault formula, and vii) the Janowitz and Williams equations for cancer patients. The mean reference GFR was 60.5 ± 33.4 mL/min/1.73 m2. The bias (mean error) values for the estimated GFR from the CKD-EPI equation, BSA-unadjusted CKD-EPI equation, re-expressed MDRD study equation with the Thai racial factor, and Thai eGFR, 2012 CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin-C, Cockcroft-Gault, and Janowitz and Williams equations were −2.68, 1.06, −7.70, −8.73, 13.37, 1.43, and 2.03 mL/min, respectively, the precision (standard deviation of bias) values were 6.89, 6.07, 14.02, 11.54, 20.85, 10.58, and 8.74 mL/min, respectively, and the accuracy (root-mean square error) values were 7.38, 6.15, 15.97, 14.16, 24.74, 10.66, and 8.96 mL/min, respectively. In conclusion, the estimated GFR from the BSA-unadjusted CKD-EPI equation demonstrated the least bias along with the highest precision and accuracy. Further studies on the outcomes of anti-cancer drug dose adjustments using this equation versus the current standard equation will be valuable.

Evolution of Equations for Estimating Renal Function and Their Application to the Dosing of New Antimicrobials.

Objective: To address the background and rationale for the recent introduction of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation for renal dose adjustment of antimicrobials and to provide recommendations for pharmacists dosing new antimicrobial agents. Data Sources: Comprehensive MEDLINE and EMBASE literature searches (from August 2018 to October 2019) were performed. Search terms included creatinine clearance, Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD, and glomerular filtration rate and a subsequent search included the preceding terms AND antimicrobials OR antibiotics. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Available English-language studies on the derivation and/or use of the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) and MDRD study equation were evaluated as well as those that specifically discussed their use for dosing antimicrobial agents. Data Synthesis: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of delafloxacin and meropenem-vaborbactam in 2017 ushered in a new era in renal dosing of antibiotics, in that both agents are recommended to be dosed by the MDRD equation. Studies demonstrate that the CG and MDRD equations can result in discrepant dosing recommendations. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: The renal estimation equation recommended in a new antibiotic label should dictate the dosing of that medication. It is noteworthy that these equations are not interchangeable. Conclusion: Recently approved antimicrobials utilizing the MDRD equation for renal dose adjustment will be interspersed with old and new antimicrobials utilizing the CG equation because of lack of singular guidance by the FDA. This requires pharmacists to be vigilant in evaluating drug labels to determine which equation is recommended and to understand the differences, strengths, and limitations of each equation.

Effect of Atorvastatin and Losartan on Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients With Mild to Moderate Chronic Kidney Disease

Background: Atorvastatin, a member of HMG CO-A reductase inhibitors, has been shown to have renoprotective effect in patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). Statins are supposed to decrease the oxidized lipid particles, suppress the activity of inflammatory mediators and prevent vascular thrombosis and thus could minimize renal cell damage. Losartan, an antihypertensive drug also diminishes proteinuria in patients with chronic kidney diseases or diabetes mellitus. Therefore the effect of concurrent use of atorvastatin and losartan on Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) could be a matter of interest from both Pharmacological and Clinical perspective.&#x0D; Objective: To assess the renoprotective effect of atorvastatin and losartan in patients with chronic kidney disease treated at Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU).&#x0D; Materials and Method: Total forty four (44) patients suffering from CKD (stage one to stage three) were enrolled into two groups. Patients in Group A, received atorvastatin (10 mg) and losartan (50 mg) once daily for eight weeks. Patients in Group B, received losartan but not atorvastatin for the same duration. Serum creatinine level was measured at the commencement and also after eight weeks to calculate estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in individual patients with MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) study equation.&#x0D; Results: There was significant (P &lt; 0.001) reduction of Serum Creatinine and significant (P &lt; 0.001) increase in e GFR in the patients, treated with atorvastatin and losartan.&#x0D; Conclusion: Concurrent administration of atorvastatin and losartan increased glomerular filtration rate (GFR) significantly in patients with chronic kidney disease.&#x0D; KYAMC Journal Vol. 10, No.-1, April 2019, Page 43-47

Blood Urea Nitrogen Levels to Verify Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate, as Derived from 2 Commonly Used Equations.

A blood urea nitrogen to creatinine ratio (BCR) of 20 or greater indicates various physiological conditions. Whether glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimates obtained using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) study equations are affected by a high BCR remains unknown. Patients who underwent urine creatinine clearance (CrCl) and serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine assessments on the same day were enrolled in our study. Those with BCR of 20 or greater and less than 20 were categorized into high- and low-BCR groups. The concordance on diagnosing chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages by using urine CrCl level and serum GFR estimates was assessed. More disagreement in CKD stage diagnosis was observed in the high-BCR group (weighted κ = 0.600 and 0.541 for the MDRD and CKD-EPI study equations, respectively) than in the low-BCR group (weighted κ = 0.816 and 0.758, respectively). A BCR of 20 or greater caused misestimation of the CKD stage. GFR estimates for patients with high BCR should be interpreted cautiously.

Clinical practice guidelines for the provision of renal service in Hong Kong: General Nephrology.

Clinical practice guidelines for the provision of renal service in Hong Kong: General Nephrology.

Detection of impaired renal function: is the modern serologic marker cystatin C more accurate than the 99mTc-MAG3 clearance?

Renal function is usually determined by means of creatinine-clearance, and of serum Cystatin C, the latter with increasing frequency. The present study analyses, whether the diagnostic accuracy of (99m)Tc-MAG(3) clearance is comparable to that of these modern serologic methods. 71 consecutive adult Caucasian patients (42 female, 29 male; age 50 +/- 16 yrs., range 20-83) who were referred to a nuclear medicine department for determination of bilateral renal function with (99m)Tc-MAG(3) were included. Following sufficient hydration, 10 ml of blood were taken for determination of Cystatin C and creatinine in serum prior to i.v. injection of the radiotracer. According to the recommendations of the National Kidney Foundation, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated from serum creatinine using either Cockcroft & Gault and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation. These estimates of GFR served as reference. Cystatin C is a low molecular protein produced by all nuclear cells and is eliminated to 85 % by glomerular filtration. Analysis of (99m)Tc-MAG(3) clearance was performed by means of Bubeck's formula. Linear regression analysis produced Pearson's correlation coefficients of r = 0.68 and r = -0.69 for the comparison of either Cystatin C and (99m)Tc-MAG(3) clearance with the Cockcroft & Gault equation. The comparison of Cystatin C and (99m)Tc-MAG(3) clearance with MDRD study equation resulted in correlation coefficients of r = 0.755 and r = -0.77. None of these differences were significant. The exclusion of renal impairment or the detection of an at least moderate renal impairment revealed again no significant differences between Cystatin C and (99m)Tc-MAG(3) clearance. Cystatin C and (99m)Tc-MAG(3) clearance are equally suited to exclude renal impairment or to detect a relevant renal impairment. Differences between both procedures are more likely a result of the applied reference method.

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate; Laboratory Implementation and Current Global Status.

In 2002, the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines for identifying and treating CKD recommended that clinical laboratories report estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with every creatinine result to assist clinical practitioners to identify people with early-stage CKD. At that time, the original Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation based on serum creatinine measurements was recommended for calculating eGFR. Because the MDRD Study equation was developed using a nonstandardized creatinine method, a Laboratory Working Group of the National Kidney Disease Education program was formed and implemented standardized calibration traceability for all creatinine methods from global manufacturers by approximately 2010. A modified MDRD Study equation for use with standardized creatinine was developed. The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration developed a new equation in 2009 that was more accurate than the MDRD Study equation at values above 60mL/min/1.73m2. As of 2017, reporting eGFR with creatinine is almost universal in many countries. A reference system for cystatin C became available in 2010, and manufacturers are in the process to standardize cystatin C assays. Equations for eGFR based on standardized cystatin C alone and with creatinine are now available from the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration and other groups.

Inadéquation du facteur ethnique pour l’estimation du débit de filtration glomérulaire en population générale noire-africaine : résultats en Côte d’Ivoire

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation is fundamental in clinical nephrology. It is usually estimated from equations based on serum creatinine. An ethnic factor is currently recommended for the black population for the two most used equations, i.e. the Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equations. However, these factors were determined from African-American subjects. Therefore, their use in the African subject (non-American) remained questionable. To date, no data are available in West Africa for the adequacy of these ethnic coefficients, as compared with a measurement of GFR by a reference method. One hundred and twenty subjects of the general population, with no nephrologic history, were included in the study (60 women and 60 men). GFR was determined by a reference method, i.e. the plasma clearance of iohexol. The performance (bias, standard deviation, accuracy within 30%) of both CKD-EPI and MDRD study equations were assessed with and without the ethnic factors. GFR measurements (mGFR) according iohexol reference method were 100±19mL/min/1.73m2. The MDRD study equation without any ethnic factor underestimates mGFR by −9±16mL/min/1.73m2, whereas the MDRD study equation with the ethnic factor overestimates mGFR by +10±18mL/min/1.73m2. Regarding the CKD-EPI equation, bias and accuracy within 30% are significantly better without than with the ethnic factor. Indeed, bias is 16±2mL/min/1.73m2 and 18±17mL/min/1.73m2 and accuracy is 93% and 76%, without and with the ethnic factor, respectively (P<0.0001). We show for the first time in African population that the performance of CKD-EPI and MDRD study equations is significantly better, in a general population, without the “African-American” ethnic factor. The “African-American” ethnic factor should not be applied in West Africa.

Renal assessment using CKD-EPI equation is useful as an early predictor of contrast- induced nephropathy in elderly patients with cancer.

To assess respective roles of serum creatinine (SCr) alone and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) as an early predictor for contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in elderly patients with cancer. eGFR of 348 patients at 65years or older with malignancy who underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) were calculated. eGFR was calculated based on the following three equations: Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation (CKD-EPI); Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study (MDRD); Cockcroft-Gault (CG). CIN was subdivided into two groups: CIN25% (SCr increase >25% but ≤0.5mg/dl), and CIN0.5 (SCr increase >0.5mg/dl). The occurrence and clinical outcomes of CIN were determined according to SCr and eGFR. After CECT, CIN occurred in 50 (14.4%) patients, including 33 CIN25% patients and 17 CIN0.5 patients. CIN0.5 was significantly correlated with prolonged hospitalizations and increased in-hospital mortality, but not CIN25%. Despite SCr<1.5mg/dl, preexisting renal insufficiency (RI) was observed in 47 (13.5%) patients based on CKD-EPI equation, 50 (14.4%) patients based on MDRD equation, and 144 (41.4%) patients based on CG formula. In preexisting RI, the prevalence of CIN0.5 had an odds ratio of 15.02 (5.24 to 43.07) based on CKD-EPI equation, 13.73 (4.81 to 39.20) based on MDRD equation, and 5.03 (1.60 to 15.75) based on CG formula. In elderly patients with cancer who visit the emergency department, renal assessment before CECT using CKD-EPI equation was superior to SCr alone, MDRD equation, or CG formula in predicting the occurrence of CIN related CECT.

Correlation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Between Renal Scan and Estimation Equation for Patients With Scleroderma

BackgroundRenal involvement in scleroderma is life-threatening. Early detection of a deterioration of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is needed to preserve kidney function. ObjectivesTo (A) determine the correlation between (1) estimated GFR (eGFR) using 4 different formulae and (2) measured GFR (mGFR) using isotopic renal scan in Thai patients with scleroderma with normal serum creatinine and (B) to define the factors influencing eGFR. MethodA cross-sectional study was performed in adult Thai patients with scleroderma at Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University, between December 2013 and April 2015. GFR was measured using the gold standard Tc-99m DTPA (Tc-99m diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid) renal scan. We compared the latter with the eGFR, calculated using the Cockroft-Gault formula, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation and creatinine clearance equation. ResultsA total of 76 patients with scleroderma (50 women and 26 men) with median age 54.8 years (interquartile range: 47.4 to 58.9) were enrolled. Mean disease duration was 5.6 ± 4.5 years. Median value of mGFR was 100.1 ± 27.6mL/minute/1.73m². There was a correlation between mGFR from the Tc-99m DTPA renal scan and the eGFR using the Cockroft-Gault formula, MDRD and CKD-EPI equation (P = 0.01, <0.001 and <0.001, respectively), but no correlation with eGFR using the creatinine clearance equation (P = 0.27). Body weight, prednisolone use and systolic blood pressure (SBP) had a negative association with mGFR (P = 0.01, 0.01 and 0.007, respectively). After multivariate analysis, SBP was the only clinical parameter that influenced mGFR (P = 0.03). ConclusionsThe Cockroft-Gault formula, MDRD study equation and CKD-EPI were useful formulae for assessing GFR in Thai patients with scleroderma. Higher SBP was associated with a lower GFR.

Physician volume and outcomes in hypertensive patients

The CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) creatinine-based equation for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) is more accurate than the MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) Study equation. However, it has not been determined whether the improvement in risk categorization applies to all segments of the population.Population-based cohort study.Adults (aged ≥18 years) who did not have kidney failure at baseline and had at least one serum creatinine measurement and dipstick proteinuria evaluation in a province-wide laboratory registry from Alberta, Canada, in 2002-2007 (N = 1,010,988).eGFR categories of ≥90, 60-89, 45-59, 30-44, and 15-29 mL/min/1.73 m2.All-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, end-stage renal disease, and doubling of serum creatinine level.GFR was estimated by the CKD-EPI and MDRD Study equations.The CKD-EPI equation reclassified 22.6% and 1.2% of participants to a higher and lower eGFR category, respectively, and decreased the prevalence of CKD stages 3 and 4 from 9.2% to 7.3%. Of 70,071 participants with eGFRMDRD of 45-59 mL/min/1.73 m2, 30.8% were reclassified to eGFRCKD-EPI of 60-89 mL/min/1.73 m2, and after adjusting for potential confounders, participants reclassified had a lower risk of all-cause mortality (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.77; 95% CI, 0.69-0.86), acute myocardial infarction (IRR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.88), end-stage renal disease (IRR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.32-0.94), and doubling of creatinine level (IRR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.59-1.04) compared with those not reclassified. Similar findings were observed for those reclassified to a higher eGFR category from other eGFRMDRD categories. Net reclassification improvements based on eGFR categories were positive for all outcomes (range, 0.146-0.256; all P < 0.001).Relatively short follow-up (median, 2.8 years), lack of data for some potential confounders (eg, smoking), and mainly white participants.These results suggest that the CKD-EPI equation more accurately categorizes individuals regarding clinical risk than the MDRD Study equation.

Abstract WMP82: Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Decreases Transiently After Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Introduction: Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are often initiated in hospital after cardioembolic stroke. The agent and dose are both dependent on renal function. The optimal assessment of renal function in the early post-stroke period is unknown. We tested the hypotheses that 1) renal function is impaired early after stroke and 2) weight-based estimates of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) are more sensitive to this acute change. Methods: We retrospectively recorded all serum creatinine measurements within 1 week of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Measurements were also taken in the year post-stroke. The Cockroft-Gault (CG), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study (MDRD), and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations were used to calculated eGFR. Renal function was classified as normal (eGFR&gt;50 ml/min), moderately (eGFR&lt;50 ml/min), or severely impaired (eGFR&lt;30 ml/min). Results: Measurements were recorded from 300 acute stroke patients over a 1 year period. Median time from symptom onset to first creatinine measurement was 5.2±14.2 h. Within 24 h of symptom onset, 66/300 (22%) and 72/300 (24%) patients had renal impairment (eGFR&lt;50 ml/min/1.73m 2 ) using the MDRD and CKD-EPI equations. The proportion of renal impairment increased to 37.4% (102/273, p&lt;0.0001), when a weight-based calculation (CG) was used. Mean eGFR (CG) within 24 h of symptom onset (65.1±33.5 ml/min) was lower than that by day 7 (68.7±33.3 ml/min, p=0.001). The acute baseline renal impairment improved into normal range in 14/68 (20.6%, p&lt;0.0001) patients within 7 days. Mean eGFR (64.7± 30.7 ml/min, p=0.383) remained stable following discharge (mean time from symptom onset to final assessment 47.4± 5.8 wks). Of the 20 patients with severe renal impairment, eGFR increased to &gt;30 ml/min in 8 (40%, p&lt;0.0001) within 7 days. A total of 231 patients (77%) were treated with an OAC within 7 days of onset. In 145 patients treated with a new OAC, the incorrect dose was initially prescribed in 60 patients. Conclusion: Acute renal impairment after stroke is common, and is most evident when weight-based eGFR is calculated. The transient nature of this renal impairment suggests OAC agent and dose selection may need to be adjusted following the acute stroke period

Major bleeding risk prediction using Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equations in acute coronary syndrome

Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations estimate glomerular filtration rate more accurately than the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation. Our aim was to evaluate whether CKD-EPI equations based on serum creatinine and/or cystatin C (CysC) predict risk for major bleeding (MB) more accurately than the MDRD Study equation in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Three hundred and fifty consecutive subjects with non-ST-segment elevation ACS (68 ± 12 years, 70% male) were studied. Glomerular filtration rate was estimated using the CKD-EPI and MDRD Study equations. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of MB during the follow-up, which was defined according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium Definition criteria as bleeding types 3-5. During the median follow-up of 589 days (interquartile range, 390-986), 27 patients had MB (0.04% events per person year). Patients with MB had worse kidney function parameters, regardless of the estimating equation used (P < 0.001). After multivariate Cox regression adjustment, both CysC-based CKD-EPI equations were independent predictors of MB (CKD-EPI(creatinine-cystatin) C per mL/min/1.73 m(2), HR = 0.973 (95%CI 0.955-0.991; P = 0.003) and CKD-EPI(cystatin) C per mL/min/1.73 m(2), HR = 0.976 (95%CI 0.976-0.992; P = 0.003), while the CKD-EPI(creatinine) and MDRD equations did not achieve statistical significance. Both CKD-EPI(creatine-cystatin) C and CKD-EPI(cystatin) C were associated with a significant improvement in MB risk reclassification. In this cohort of non-ST-segment elevation ACS patients with relatively preserved renal function, both CysC-based CKD-EPI equations improved ability to predict risk for MB and were superior to other equations for this application.

Performance of Creatinine-Based GFR Estimating Equations in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients

Accurate assessment of kidney function is important for the management of solid-organ transplant recipients. In other clinical populations, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) most commonly is estimated using the CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) creatinine or the 4-variable MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) Study equation. The accuracy of these equations compared with other GFR estimating equations in transplant recipients has not been carefully studied. Diagnostic test study. Solid-organ transplant recipients longer than 6 months posttransplantation from 5 clinical populations (N=3,622, including recipients of kidney [53%], liver [35%], and other or multiple organs [12%]). Estimated GFR (eGFR) using creatinine-based GFR estimating equations identified from a systematic review of the literature. Performance of the CKD-EPI creatinine and the MDRD Study equations was compared with alternative equations. Measured GFR (mGFR) from urinary clearance of iothalamate or plasma clearance of iohexol. Error (difference between mGFR and eGFR) expressed as P30 (proportion of absolute percent error <30%) and mean absolute error. We identified 26 GFR estimating equations. Mean mGFR was 55.1±22.7 (SD) mL/min/1.73 m(2). P30 and mean absolute error for the CKD-EPI and the MDRD Study equations were 78.9% (99.6% CI, 76.9%-80.8%) for both and 10.6 (99.6% CI, 10.1-11.1) versus 11.0 (99.6% CI, 10.5-11.5) mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively; these equations were more accurate than any of the alternative equations (P <0.001 for all pairwise comparisons for both measures). They performed better than or as well as the alternative equations in most subgroups defined by demographic and clinical characteristics, including type of transplanted organ. Study population included few nonwhites and people with solid-organ transplants other than liver and kidneys. The CKD-EPI creatinine and the MDRD Study equations perform better than the alternative creatinine-based estimating equations in solid-organ transplant recipients. They can be used for clinical management.