Moderate-risk Allele Research Articles

Dementia-related genetic variants in an Italian population of early-onset Alzheimer's disease.

Early-onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD) is the most common form of early-onset dementia. Although three major genes have been identified as causative, the genetic contribution to the disease remains unsolved in many patients. Recent studies have identified pathogenic variants in genes representing a risk factor for developing Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and in causative genes for other degenerative dementias as responsible for EOAD. To study them further, we investigated a panel of candidate genes in 102 Italian EOAD patients, 45.10% of whom had a positive family history and 21.74% with a strong family history of dementia. We found that 10.78% of patients carried pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, including a novel variant, in PSEN1, PSEN2, or APP, and 7.84% showed homozygosity for the ε4 APOE allele. Additionally, 7.84% of patients had a moderate risk allele in PSEN1, PSEN2, or TREM2 genes. Besides, we observed that 12.75% of our patients carried only a variant in genes associated with other neurodegenerative diseases. The combination of these variants contributes to explain 46% of cases with a definite familiarity and 32% of sporadic forms. Our results confirm the importance of extensive genetic screening in EOAD for clinical purposes, to select patients for future treatments and to contribute to the definition of overlapping pathogenic mechanisms between AD and other forms of dementia.

Clustering of known low and moderate risk alleles rather than a novel recessive high-risk gene in non-BRCA1/2 sib trios affected with breast cancer.

Breast cancer risk is approximately twice as high in first‐degree relatives of female breast cancer cases than in women in the general population. Less than half of this risk can be attributed to the currently known genetic risk factors. Recessive risk alleles represent a relatively underexplored explanation for the remainder of familial risk. To address this, we selected 19 non‐BRCA1/2 breast cancer families in which at least three siblings were affected, while no first‐degree relatives of the previous or following generation had breast cancer. Germline DNA from one of the siblings was subjected to exome sequencing, while all affected siblings were genotyped using SNP arrays to assess haplotype sharing and to calculate a polygenic risk score (PRS) based on 160 low‐risk variants. We found no convincing candidate recessive alleles among exome sequencing variants in genomic regions for which all three siblings shared two haplotypes. However, we found two families in which all affected siblings carried the CHEK2*1100delC. In addition, the average normalized PRS of the “recessive” family probands (0.81) was significantly higher than that in both general population cases (0.35, P = .026) and controls (P = .0004). These findings suggest that the familial aggregation is, at least in part, explained by a polygenic effect of common low‐risk variants and rarer intermediate‐risk variants, while we did not find evidence of a role for novel recessive risk alleles.

Screening of HELQ in breast and ovarian cancer families

Several high and moderate risk alleles have been identified for breast and ovarian cancer predisposition and most of them encode proteins that function in DNA repair. A prospective candidate for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility is the HELQ helicase that has a role in the resolution of DNA interstrand cross-links. HELQ interacts with the RAD51 paralog complex BCDX2. Two components of the complex, RAD51C and RAD51D, increase the risk of ovarian cancer especially, and the other two, RAD51B and XRCC2 have been associated with breast cancer risk. To investigate the role of HELQ in cancer predisposition, we screened the gene for germline variation in 185 Finnish breast or ovarian cancer families and performed haplotype analyses for 1517 breast cancer cases, 308 ovarian cancer cases, and 1234 population controls using five common polymorphisms at the HELQ gene locus. No truncating mutations were identified among the families. One putatively pathogenic missense mutation c.1309A>G was identified but no additional carriers were observed in the subsequent genotyping of 332 familial breast or ovarian cancer patients. Furthermore, the haplotype distribution did not differ between breast or ovarian cancer cases and population controls. Our results indicate that HELQ is not a major breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene in the Finnish population. However, we cannot rule out rare risk-variants in the Finnish or other populations and larger datasets are needed to further assess the role of HELQ especially in ovarian cancer predisposition.

Abstract 5616: Assessment of differential DNA methylation by genotype in ovarian cancer cases and controls

Abstract Ovarian carcinoma is a significant cause of cancer mortality in women in the United States. Increasing evidence has demonstrated that differential methylation status in lymphocyte DNA may be linked to risk of carcinogenesis. We are investigating the differential DNA methylation in germline DNA obtained from pre-treatment ovarian cancer cases (n=256) and individually-age matched controls (n=274) using the Illumina Infinium Human Methylation 27K BeadChip. We are first studying methylation and the common moderate-risk alleles for ovarian cancer on chromosomes 2q31, 3q25, 8q24, 9p22, 17q21, and 19p13. Within each locus, we correlated single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes with methylation values at relevant nearby CpG sites. Preliminary results are available on the first set of 84 cases and 90 controls. At 2q31, cases with TG or TT genotype at rs2072590 were hypomethylated at HOXD1 (a homeobox transcription factor) compared to cases with GG genotype (mean beta TG/TT=0.08, GG=0.09, p=0.034); and at 17q21, cases with AG or GG genotype at rs9303542 were hypomethylated at SKAP1 (a T-cell adaptor protein) compared to cases with AA genotype (mean beta AG/GG=0.14, AA=0.16, p=0.045). At these two loci, similar trends were seen among controls. Logistic regression adjusted for age and methylation chip was then used to assess the association between SNP genotype and ovarian cancer risk, with and without inclusion of the relevant methylation value. At HOXD1 rs2072590, the per-allele ovarian cancer risk of 1.34 attenuated to 1.25 with inclusion of the HOXD1 methylation value as a covariate, suggesting that the disease association may be mediated in part through methylation. Though based on preliminary data, results are consistent with a role for inherited variation on germline methylation at HOXD1 and SKAP1. Analysis of methylation on additional genotyped cases and controls is underway. Finally, because, trans effects may also exist, we are assessing relationships between genotype and methylation at other loci throughout the genome. Such correlative molecular studies have the potential to help elucidate mechanisms underlying associations from genome-wide association studies. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5616. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-5616

Abstract 3860: New ovarian cancer susceptibility loci identified

Abstract Genome-wide association analyses have identified an ovarian cancer susceptibility locus near BNC2 at 9p22.2 (OR 0.82, p 5.1 × 10−19, Nat Genet 41:996-1000, 2009), based on 1,772 and 2,354 Stage I cases and controls, 4,803 and 5,237 Stage 2 cases and controls, and extensive Stage 3 analysis in independent samples. Here, we report on Stage 3 analysis of nine additional regions with Stage 2 results at p < 10−4. Stage 1 samples were genotyped using the Illumina 610Quad and imputed at up to 2 million SNPs; Stage 2 samples were genotyped on an Illumina iSelect of 22,790 SNPs. Stage 3 samples from 4,335 cases (including 2,197 serous subtype) and 5,951 controls (14 studies) were genotyped using Illumina or Sequenom at up to 32 SNPs on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 11, and 17. No evidence of heterogeneity by study site was observed. Logistic regression revealed four regions with ordinal p ≤ 10−7 in all cases or serous subtype only. The most significant finding for all cases was for rs2072590 at 2q31.1 (all cases OR 1.15, p=8.1 × 10−13; serous only OR 1.19 p=9.0 × 10−13) which is located 3.8 kb 3-prime of HOXD3, a homeobox gene which also had an intronic SNP (rs2301301) with p=3.1 × 10−5 (all cases). Second, we observed a locus at 8q24.21 highlighted by rs10088218 (all cases OR 0.84, p=1.3 × 10−9; serous only OR 0.75 p=2.2 × 10−14). This locus resides on the opposite side of MYC and 1.3 Mb from the 8q24 regions harboring loci for other cancers, and is independent of the other cancer-associated variants (r2 < 0.02). Third, at 3q25.31, promising results were observed at rs2665390, a SNP intronic to TIPARP (TiPARP, TCDD-inducible poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; all cases OR 1.19, p=8.7 × 10−7; serous only OR 1.26, p=3.2 × 10−8). Finally, at 17q21.32, rs9303542 was associated with risk particularly among serous cases (all cases OR 1.13, p=1.5 × 10−6; serous only OR 1.16 p=4.3 × 10−7); this SNP is intronic to SKAP1 (src kinase associated phosphoprotein 1). We evaluated the functional role of genes at these loci in ovarian cancer and normal ovarian epithelial cells and in an in vitro model of neoplastic initiation and progression from normal ovarian epithelial cells after CYMC and KRAS activation. Both BNC2 and TiPARP were down regulated in cancer versus normal cells (p=5 × 10−9 and p=3.4 × 10−5, respectively) suggesting that loss of function is required for cancer development. Over-expressing CMYC (at 8q24) induced neoplastic transformation of normal ovarian cells. Both BNC2 and TiPARP were down-regulated following CMYC over-expression and showed significant loss of function with further transformation after mutant KRAS activation (p=7.8 × 10−7 and p=6.3 × 10−4, respectively). These results emphasize the importance of genome-wide association studies and consortia for the identification of moderate-risk alleles in rare cancers. Importantly, our findings unravel the genetic components of this disease and suggest functionally-significant novel targets. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3860.