Moderate CYP3A4 Inhibitor Research Articles

Coadministration of Cariprazine with a Moderate CYP3A4 Inhibitor in Patients with Schizophrenia: Implications for Dose Adjustment and Safety Monitoring.

Cariprazine is metabolised mainly by CYP3A4 and to a lesser extent by CYP2D6. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of erythromycin, a moderate cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics of cariprazine in male patients with schizophrenia, and to assess the influence of CYP2D6 phenotypes on cariprazine metabolism. Forty-two patients received oral doses of 1.5 mg cariprazine alone for 28 days (to reach steady state), followed by a co-administration of cariprazine 1.5 mg daily with erythromycin 500 mg twice daily (BID) and Enterol 250 mg BID for 21 days, followed by a 14-day post-treatment period. Blood samples were collected at predefined time points and analysed for cariprazine, its two active metabolites: desmethyl cariprazine (DCAR) and didesmethyl cariprazine (DDCAR), and erythromycin using validated high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods. CYP2D6 phenotypes were determined by genotyping. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis. Erythromycin increased the area under the curve (AUCτ) and peak concentration (Cmax) of Total cariprazine (cariprazine + DCAR + DDCAR) by about 40-50% but did not affect the time to peak concentration (Tmax). The CYP2D6 phenotypes had no substantial effect on the pharmacokinetics of cariprazine and its metabolites, either alone or in combination with erythromycin. Cariprazine was well tolerated and safe. The findings suggest that co-administration of cariprazine with moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors may require dose adjustment or monitoring; however, pharmacogenetic testing for CYP2D6 is not necessary for optimising cariprazine therapy. Trial registration number (EudraCT Number): 2018-003721-28. Date of registration: 21-SEP-2018.

Characterization of rimegepant drug-drug interactions using the cytochrome P450 probe drugs, itraconazole, rifampin, fluconazole, and midazolam.

Reported here are the results of four rimegepant phase I studies, in healthy participants, aimed at determining the invivo potential of rimegepant (75 mg) for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4-related drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Rimegepant orally disintegrating tablet (Pfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA) is a calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist approved for acute treatment of migraine and preventive treatment of episodic migraine. People with migraine commonly use multiple drug treatments, with the potential for DDIs. Each study was an open-label, single-arm, single-sequence, crossover study. Rimegepant was tested as a victim drug by separate co-administration of itraconazole (a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor and P-glycoprotein inhibitor) in Study 1, rifampin (a strong CYP3A4 inducer and moderate CYP2C9 inducer) in Study 2, and fluconazole (a strong CYP2C9 inhibitor and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor) in Study 3, and as a perpetrator drug by co-administration with midazolam (a CYP3A4 substrate) in Study 4. Mean values of single-dose rimegepant maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-inf) increased with itraconazole co-administration (n = 22) by 1.42-fold (90% confidence interval [CI] 1.25-1.61) and by 4.14-fold (90% CI 3.87-4.44), respectively, and decreased with rifampin co-administration (n = 21) to 36% (90% CI 31.2-41.4%) and to 19% (90% CI 16.3-21.4%), respectively. Co-administration with fluconazole (n = 23) increased rimegepant mean AUC0-inf by 1.80-fold (90% CI 1.68-1.93), with no impact on Cmax (1.04-fold; 90% CI 0.94-1.15). Co-administration of rimegepant single dose (300 mg; n = 14) or multiple doses (150 mg/day; n = 14) increased the mean Cmax of midazolam by 1.38-fold (90% CI 1.13-1.67) and 1.53-fold (90% CI 1.32-1.78), respectively, and the AUC0-inf of midazolam by 1.86-fold (90% CI 1.58-2.19) and 1.91-fold (90% CI 1.63-2.25), respectively. Based on the magnitude of DDIs, these studies indicate the following: co-administration of rimegepant with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor should be avoided; during co-administration with a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor, another dose of rimegepant within 48 h should be avoided; co-administration of rimegepant with a strong or moderate CYP3A4 inducer should be avoided; CYP2C9 does not play a meaningful role in rimegepant metabolism; and there is no clinically meaningful CYP3A4 inhibition by rimegepant.

FEATURES OF DRUG-DRUG INTERACTIONS BETWEEN RIVAROXABAN AND P-GLYCOPROTEIN INHIBITOR DEPENDING ON CYP3A4/A5 GENE POLYMORPHISM IN PATIENTS 80 YEARS AND OLDER WITH NONVALVULAR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

Abstract Introduction. Increased risk of bleeding associated with rivaroxaban administration is associated with polymorphism of genes involved in its biotransformation, as well as with the use of drugs that inhibit common metabolic pathways. However, the data are contradictory. Objective of the work.To study the features of drug-drug interactions between rivaroxaban and a P-glycoprotein inhibitor (using verapamil as an example) depending on the polymorphism of the CYP3A4 (rs35599367)and CYP3A5 (rs776746)genes in patients aged 80 years and older with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Material and methods. A total of 128 patients (median age 87.5 years [83-90 years], 75% women) were examined. All patients underwent genotyping for the studied polymorphisms, determination of the minimum steady-state concentration of rivaroxaban (Cmin,ss), standardization of the minimum steady-state concentration of rivaroxaban per daily dose (Cmin,ss /D), determination of prothrombin time (PT) in plasma, and analysis of medical records for the presence of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB). Results.Co-administration of rivaroxaban with verapamil compared with patients receiving rivaroxaban without calcium channel blockers in CYP3A4gene CC carriers resulted in higher values of Cmin,ss(73.8 [49-113.5] vs 40.5 [25.6-73.3] ng/ml), Cmin,ss /D (2.5 [1.7-4.0] vs 4.7 [2.9-7.7] ng/ml/mg), PT (14.8 [13.3-17.3] vs 14.0 [12.6-14.5] sec) and CRNMB (10/30 (33.3%) vs 6/45 (13.3%) cases), (p0.05). In carriers of the GG gene, CYP3A5resulted in higher values of Cmin,ss (74.7 [50.6-108.8] vs 40.2 [25.7-72.3] ng/ml), Cmin,ss /D 4.6 [3.0-7.3] vs 2.5 [1.7-4.0] ng/ml/mg), PT (14.6 [12.8-15.2] vs 14.0 [12.6-14.5] sec) and CRNMB (10/27 (37%) vs 5/40 (12.5%) cases), (p0.05). And in GA+AA carriers of the CYP3A5gene, it resulted in higher values of Cmin,ss (88.1 [5.5-88.1] vs 52.8 [25.0-77.2] ng/ml), Cmin,ss /D 5.7 [0.4-5.7] vs 3.5 [1.7-5.2] ng/ml/mg), (p0.05). In CT carriers of the CYP3A4 gene, the combined use of rivaroxaban with verapamil was not observed in our sample. Conclusions:Carriers of the homozygous wild-type CYP3A4/A5 genotype showed high pharmacokinetic variability to verapamil (a strong P-glycoprotein inhibitor and a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor).

Pacritinib and concurrent azole antifungal therapy is deliverable in patients with hematologic malignancies.

Pacritinib is a novel kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of adults with intermediate or high-risk primary or secondary myelofibrosis. Strong and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors, such as some azole antifungals, are contraindicated or recommended to be avoided in combination with pacritinib, respectively. We aim to report our experience in patients who received pacritinib with concurrent azole antifungal therapy. We queried for patients with hematologic malignancies in the electronic medical record who received concurrent pacritinib and azole antifungal therapy. There were five cases of concurrent pacritinib and azole antifungal therapy in which none of the patients experienced grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicities. Some patients required dose modifications and/or interruptions in pacritinib therapy. This is the first clinical experience describing concurrent pacritinib and azole antifungals. Our experience shows that in the setting where this interaction cannot be avoided, concurrent administration is feasible with close monitoring and possible empiric dose reductions in select patients.

PBPK Modeling of Entrectinib and Its Active Metabolite to Derive Dose Adjustments in Pediatric Populations Co-Administered with CYP3A4 Inhibitors.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models of entrectinib and its equipotent metabolite, M5, were established in healthy adult subjects and extrapolated to pediatric patients to predict increases in steady-state systemic exposure on co-administration of strong and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors (itraconazole at 5 mg/kg, erythromycin at 7.5-12.5 mg/kg and fluconazole at 3-12 mg/kg, respectively). Adult model establishment involved the optimization of fraction metabolized by CYP3A4 (0.92 for entrectinib and 0.98 for M5) using data from an itraconazole DDI study. This model captured well the exposure changes of entrectinib and M5 seen in adults co-administered with the strong CYP3A4 inducer rifampicin. In pediatrics, reasonable prediction of entrectinib and M5 pharmacokinetics in ≧2 year olds was achieved when using the default models for physiological development and enzyme ontogenies. However, a two to threefold misprediction of entrectinib and M5 exposures was seen in <2 year olds which may be due to missing mechanistic understanding of gut physiology and/or protein binding in very young children. Model predictions for ≧2 year olds showed that entrectinib AUC(0-t) was increased by approximately sevenfold and five to threefold by strong and high-moderate and low-moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors, respectively. Based on these victim DDI predictions, dose adjustments for entrectinib when given concomitantly with strong and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors in pediatric subjects were recommended. These simulations informed the approved entrectinib label without the need for additional clinical pharmacology studies.

An open label, single arm, multicenter phase II study of the efficacy and safety of LP-168 monotherapy for relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma.

TPS7098 Background: Targeting Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) has demonstrated impressive efficacy in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (R/R MCL). Covalent BTK inhibitors (cBTKi) have produced extended disease remission and durable responses in R/R MCL. However, patients with continuous cBTKi treatment tend to develop selection or outgrowth of resistant clones, which triggers disease relapse. Non-covalent binding BTKi has become a treatment option for patients who progressed on cBTKi. LP-168 is a highly selective next-generation inhibitor of BTK that can bind wild-type BTK covalently and C481-mutated BTK non-covalently (reversibly) Here, we propose to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LP-168 monotherapy in patients with R/R MCL. Methods: NCT05716087 is an open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase II study to assess the efficacy, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of LP-168 in Chinese patients with R/R MCL who have failed prior cBTKi treatment. Responses were evaluated using Lugano 2014 criteria. Eligible patients with R/R MCL must show evidence of disease progression or intolerance to at least a prior cBTKi. Patients are also required to have adequate bone marrow, liver function, kidney function, and heart function, and an ECOG performance status of 0-2. Moreover, patients must have at least one measurable lesion. Key exclusion criteria include previous non-covalent BTKi or BTK proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTAC) treatment, uncontrolled systemic disease, active infection, central nervous system (CNS) involvement, prior history of other malignancies within two years, and current pregnancy or breastfeeding. Concomitant use of strong or moderate CYP3A4 inducers and inhibitors or OATP1B1/OATP1B3 sensitive substrates is prohibited. LP-168 is orally administered at 150mg once daily in 28-day/cycle until progressive disease (PD), unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, death, or other reasons for treatment discontinuation. In this study, the primary endpoint was ORR according to an independent review committee (IRC) assessment based on the best overall response (BOR) of PR or better per Lugano 2014 criteria. Secondary endpoints include safety evaluation, quality of life assessment, PK parameters, ORR by investigator’s assessment, and other efficacy parameters, such as complete response ratio (CRR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), and time to response (TTR). First patient was enrolled on May 12, 2023. Currently 41 study sites across China are actively enrolling patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05716087. Clinical trial information: NCT05716087 .

A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic precision dosing approach to manage dasatinib drug-drug interactions.

Dasatinib, a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is approved for treating chronic myeloid and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. As a sensitive cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 substrate and weak base with strong pH-sensitive solubility, dasatinib is susceptible to enzyme-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with CYP3A4 perpetrators and pH-dependent DDIs with acid-reducing agents. This work aimed to develop a whole-body physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of dasatinib to describe and predict enzyme-mediated and pH-dependent DDIs, to evaluate the impact of strong and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers on dasatinib exposure and to support optimized dasatinib dosing. Overall, 63 plasma profiles from perorally administered dasatinib in healthy volunteers and cancer patients were used for model development. The model accurately described and predicted plasma profiles with geometric mean fold errors (GMFEs) for area under the concentration-time curve from the first to the last timepoint of measurement (AUClast) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of 1.27 and 1.29, respectively. Regarding the DDI studies used for model development, all (8/8) predicted AUClast and Cmax ratios were within twofold of observed ratios. Application of the PBPK model for dose adaptations within various DDIs revealed dasatinib dose reductions of 50%-80% for strong and 0%-70% for moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors and a 2.3-3.1-fold increase of the daily dasatinib dose for CYP3A4 inducers to match the exposure of dasatinib administered alone. The developed model can be further employed to personalize dasatinib therapy, thereby help coping with clinical challenges resulting from DDIs and patient-related factors, such as elevated gastric pH.

Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of tazemetostat.

Tazemetostat, a novel oral selective inhibitor of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2020 for use in patients with advanced epithelioid sarcoma or relapsed/refractory (R/R) EZH2-mutated follicular lymphoma. These indications were approved by the FDA trough accelerated approval based on objective response rate and duration of response that resulted from phase 2 clinical trials. Tazemetostat competes with S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) cofactor to inhibit EZH2, reducing the levels of trimethylated lysine 27 of histone 3 (H3K27me3), considered as pharmacodynamic marker. Tazemetostat is orally bioavailable, characterized by rapid absorption and dose-proportional exposure, which is not influenced by coadministration with food or gastric acid reducing agents. It highly distributes in tissues, but with limited access to central nervous system. Tazemetostat is metabolized by CYP3A in the liver to 3 major inactive metabolites (M1, M3, and M5), has a short half-life and is mainly excreted in feces. Drug-drug interactions were shown with moderate CYP3A inhibitors as fluconazole, leading the FDA to recommend a 50% dose reduction, while studies investigating coadministration of tazemetostat with strong inhibitors/inducers are ongoing. No dosage modifications are recommended based on renal or hepatic dysfunctions. Overall, tazemetostat is the first-in-class EZH2 inhibitor approved by the FDA for cancer treatment. Current clinical studies are evaluating combination therapies in patients with several malignancies.

Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling of the drug-drug interaction between ivacaftor and lefamulin in cystic fibrosis patients.

Lefamulin is being evaluated as a treatment for bacterial exacerbations in cystic fibrosis (CF). Ivacaftor is approved for the treatment of patients with CF. Lefamulin is a moderate CYP3A inhibitor and co-administration with ivacaftor may result in a drug-drug interaction (DDI). A CF population was built based on literature using the Simcyp Simulator. A previously developed and validated physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for ivacaftor was used. A PBPK model for lefamulin was developed and verified. Predicted concentrations and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for both ivacaftor and lefamulin in healthy subjects and patients with CF were in reasonable agreement with observed data (within 1.4-fold, majority within 1.25-fold). The lefamulin model as a CYP3A4 perpetrator was validated using a different Ki value for oral (p.o.) and intravenous (i.v.) routes. The simulated changes in area under the curve of ivacaftor in patients with CF when co-administered with p.o. and i.v. lefamulin were weak-to-moderate. The predicted change in ivacaftor PK when co-administered with oral lefamulin was less than observed between ivacaftor and fluconazole. These results suggest a low liability for a DDI between lefamulin and ivacaftor in patients with CF.

Evaluation of the drug-drug interaction potential of brigatinib using a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling approach.

Brigatinib is an oral anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor approved for the treatment of ALK-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Invitro studies indicated that brigatinib is primarily metabolized by CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 and inhibits P-gp, BCRP, OCT1, MATE1, and MATE2K. Clinical drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies with the strong CYP3A inhibitor itraconazole or the strong CYP3A inducer rifampin demonstrated that CYP3A-mediated metabolism was the primary contributor to overall brigatinib clearance in humans. A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for brigatinib was developed to predict potential DDIs, including the effect of moderate CYP3A inhibitors or inducers on brigatinib pharmacokinetics (PK) and the effect of brigatinib on the PK of transporter substrates. The developed model was able to predict clinical DDIs with itraconazole (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity [AUC∞] ratio [with/without itraconazole]: predicted 1.86; observed 2.01) and rifampin (AUC∞ ratio [with/without rifampin]: predicted 0.16; observed 0.20). Simulations using the developed model predicted that moderate CYP3A inhibitors (e.g., verapamil and diltiazem) may increase brigatinib AUC∞ by ~40%, whereas moderate CYP3A inducers (e.g., efavirenz) may decrease brigatinib AUC∞ by ~50%. Simulations of potential transporter-mediated DDIs predicted that brigatinib may increase systemic exposures (AUC∞) of P-gp substrates (e.g., digoxin and dabigatran) by 15%-43% and MATE1 substrates (e.g., metformin) by up to 29%; however, negligible effects were predicted on BCRP-mediated efflux and OCT1-mediated uptake. The PBPK analysis results informed dosing recommendations for patients receiving moderate CYP3A inhibitors (40% brigatinib dose reduction) or inducers (up to 100% increase in brigatinib dose) during treatment, as reflected in the brigatinib prescribing information.

Clinical significance of coadministration of moderate to strong CYP enzyme inhibitors with doxorubicin in breast cancer patients receiving AC chemotherapy.

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme inhibitors may increase the toxicity of many chemotherapies. Medication databases classify doxorubicin coadministration with CYP2D6 or CYP3A4 inhibitors as either a major interaction or contraindication. This study assessed the incidence of toxicity secondary to doxorubicin given with or without CYP enzyme inhibitors in breast cancer patients receiving doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. This retrospective study included female breast cancer patients treated with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC). Patients were divided into three arms: no moderate or strong CYP inhibitor interactions, moderate or strong CYP2D6 inhibitor interactions, or moderate or strong CYP3A4 inhibitor interactions. Primary outcomes included incidence of doxorubicin-associated toxicity, unplanned medical visits, chemotherapy treatment delays, and doxorubicin dose reductions. The secondary endpoint was time to toxicity. There were 171 patients included (n = 20 patients in the CYP2D6 inhibitor group and n = 15 in the CYP3A4 inhibitor group). Neither CYP inhibitor group showed a difference in incidence of hepatotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, myelotoxicity, moderate/severe nausea, or treatment delays. Compared to the no CYP inhibitor group, the CYP2D6 inhibitor group experienced a higher incidence of unplanned medical visits (45% vs. 19.4%; p = 0.023) and more frequent doxorubicin dose reductions (30% vs. 7.2%; p = 0.006). The CYP3A4 inhibitor group did not differ from the no CYP inhibitor group for these outcomes. CYP inhibitors, particularly CYP2D6 inhibitors, may affect doxorubicin tolerability, as seen in this study by an increased incidence of unplanned medical visits and doxorubicin dose reductions.

Pharmacokinetics of asundexian with combined CYP3A and P-gp inhibitors and an inducer: Target in vitro and in vivo studies.

Asundexian is an oral, direct and reversible inhibitor of activated factor XI (FXIa) in development for the treatment of thromboembolic events. This article summarizes results from preclinical and clinical studies, including identification of enzymes involved in asundexian pharmacokinetics, and evaluation of potential target drug-drug interactions. In vitro studies investigated the substrate characteristics of asundexian towards several cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoforms, hydrolytic enzymes and drug transporters. Inhibition of the amide hydrolysis of asundexian was investigated in vitro for several relevant drugs. Phase 1 studies in healthy male participants investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of asundexian upon co-administration of combined inhibitors or an inducer of P-gp and CYP3A4 (itraconazole, verapamil or carbamazepine, respectively, or the moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor fluconazole). The pharmacodynamic (PD) markers are activated partial thromboplastin time and FXIa inhibition. Asundexian was predominantly metabolized via carboxylesterase 1 and, to a lesser extent, via CYP3A4 and is a substrate of P-gp. The asundexian area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) increased by 103% and 75.6% upon combined inhibition of P-gp and strong or moderate inhibition of CYP3A4, respectively, but was unaffected by moderate CYP3A4 inhibition. Combined P-gp and CYP3A4 induction by carbamazepine decreased asundexian AUC by 44.4%. PD is concentration-dependent, thus no differences in maximum responses and recovery commensurate with PK effect(s) were observed. Adverse events were mild and asundexian was well tolerated. The presented studies confirmed that CYP3A4 and P-gp contribute to asundexian metabolism and excretion. Observed effects were in line with data from a previous mass balance study.

Evaluation of the potential drug-drug interactions of carotegrast methyl with midazolam, prednisolone or atorvastatin in healthy adults.

This study evaluated drug-drug interactions between the CYP3A4 inhibitor carotegrast methyl and the other CYP3A4 substrates, midazolam, atorvastatin and prednisolone. A total of 88 healthy volunteers orally received carotegrast methyl 960 mg 3 times daily for 14 days. A single oral (5 mg) or intravenous (0.017 mg kg-1 ) midazolam, oral (5 mg) prednisolone or oral (10 mg) atorvastatin was administered before, with and after carotegrast methyl treatment. When the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the geometric mean ratios of the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters with coadministration with carotegrast methyl (Day 14) to those before carotegrast methyl administration was between 0.80 and 1.25, no PK interaction were deemed. The Cmax and AUC0-t of oral midazolam before administration of carotegrast methyl were 30.9 ± 9.8 ng mL-1 and 74.5 ± 21.9 ng h mL-1 , respectively. The geometric mean ratio of the Cmax and AUC0-t of midazolam on Day 14 to those on Day -1 was 1.86 (90% CI, 1.64-2.11) and 3.07 (90% CI, 2.81-3.35), which did not fall within the range of 0.80-1.25, suggesting that carotegrast methyl had a PK interaction with midazolam. Similar PK interactions were found for intravenous midazolam and atorvastatin, but not for prednisolone. The inhibitory effect of carotegrast methyl on CYP3A4-mediated metabolism of midazolam and atorvastatin had almost disappeared by 14 days after the end of administration. Carotegrast methyl was classified as a moderate CYP3A4 inhibitor in humans. Carotegrast methyl might enhance the action of drugs that are metabolized by CYP3A4.

Concurrent Versus Sequential or No Triazole Anti-Fungal Therapy in Patients Undergoing 7+3 Plus Midostaurin Induction for FLT-3 Acute Myelogenous Leukemia

Background Midostaurin is a multikinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Stone RM et al. NEJM 2017). Azole antifungal medications are commonly used in AML and are known to interact with anti-cancer drugs such as Midostaurin through the CYP3A pathway. This could result in an increase in midostaurin concentrations and toxicities, and lead to potential dose interruptions or modifications. However, the literature is scarce on outcomes in patients who are receiving an azole antifungal with intensive induction chemotherapy in combination with midostaurin (Sechaud R et al. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2022). In addition to the scarcity of literature, there are no midostaurin related dose modifications that are recommended with strong CYP3A inhibitors. The primary objective of this retrospective study was to compare induction efficacy and safety outcomes in patients receiving concurrent azole antifungal to patients receiving sequential or no azole antifungal therapy. Methods: From January 1, 2017, to January 30, 2023, we retrospectively reviewed all adult patients (18 or older) with newly diagnosed AML who received midostaurin in combination with cytarabine and an anthracycline (7+3). Concurrent azole therapy was defined as patients receiving an azole antifungal therapy with midostaurin for more than 70% of the midostaurin doses. Sequential azole therapy was defined as patients receiving azole antifungal therapy with midostaurin for less than 70% of the doses or no azole antifungal therapy with midostaurin therapy. Response outcome CR and CR without hematological recovery (CRi) were defined per standard International Working Group (IWG) AML response criteria. Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment was done on post-induction bone marrow aspirate using multiparametric flow cytometric assessment. Adverse events were graded using NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. We compared efficacy and safety outcomes in patients who received azole antifungals concurrently to those who did not receive an azole or received it sequentially to midostaurin for treatment of FLT3 AML. Mann-Whitney U test method was used to compare continuous variables between these two groups. Pearson Chi-square test or Fisher Exact test was used to compare categorical variables (count, rate or proportion) between these two groups. The choice of concurrent azole or sequential azole antifungal was determined by physician choice. Results: There were 40 patients treated with 7+3+midostaurin, 18 of whom received concurrent azole therapy, while 22 received sequential or no azole therapy. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics (Table 1) except for more patients receiving isavuconazole (moderate CYP 3A4 inhibitor) in the concurrent group (50% vs 0%; p&amp;lt;0.01) and more micafungin in the sequential or no azole group (0% vs 72%; p&amp;lt;0.01). Overall CR/CRi rate with concurrent versus sequential or no azole was 72% (13/18) vs 77% (17/22), with no significant difference in median days to ANC recovery (27 vs 29; p=0.98), platelet recovery (28 vs 32 days; p=0.67), and non-hematologic grade 3 toxicities (22% and 45%; p=0.13), respectively. There were higher, but not significant, rates of midostaurin dose reductions (6% vs 0%; p=0.26) and holds (17% vs 14%; p=0.79) in the concurrent azole group. Conclusion: In conclusion, the addition of azole antifungal was found to be equally safe and effective in the treatment of newly diagnosed FTL3 AML. Dose modifications in midostaurin appeared not to be necessary with concurrent azole antifungal therapy. Further analysis based on a larger cohort is needed to confirm the outcomes and safety endpoints reported in the current study. Given the importance of azole anti-fungal therapy in the treatment of AML and specifically in induction therapy for AML (Cornely et al, NEJM 2007), dose modifications for this drug interaction should be studied in the future to help guide clinicians on how to appropriately dose these drugs.

Covalent Menin Inhibitor Bmf-219 in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory (R/R) Acute Leukemia (AL): Preliminary Phase 1 Data from the Covalent-101 Study

Background: Menin, a protein involved in transcriptional regulation, plays a role in the genesis of multiple cancers. Preclinical data from BMF-219, an investigational, highly selective, oral small-molecule inhibitor of menin, show sustained potent abrogation of menin-dependent oncogenic signaling. BMF-219 is the first and only covalent menin inhibitor in clinical development and is being evaluated in multiple hematologic malignancies, solid tumors, and diabetes mellitus. COVALENT-101 (NCT05153330) is a Phase I dose-escalation and -expansion study of BMF-219 in R/R AL (Cohort 1), DLBCL (Cohort 2), MM (Cohort 3), and CLL (Cohort 4). Here we report preliminary safety, PK and anticancer activity data from Cohort 1 (AL). Methods: Doses of BMF-219 are escalated independently for each indication, initially in single-subject cohorts followed by a “3 + 3” design. Eligible patients (pts) include adults with R/R AL ineligible for standard therapy. Initially pts were enrolled agnostic to molecular status. A subsequent amendment introduced quotas for KMT2Ar (MLL1r), NPM1 and other known menin-dependent mutations: CEBP/A, MLL1-PTD, MN1, NUP98, NUP214, PICALM-AF10, SETBP1. Prior exposure to reversible menin inhibitor therapy is permitted. Subjects receive BMF-219 daily for continuous 28-day cycles until progression/intolerability. There are 2 parallel dose-escalation arms: pts not taking (Arm A) or taking (Arm B) moderate or strong CYP3A4 inhibitors. The study is ongoing and accruing in the escalation. Expansion cohorts will enroll pts to obtain further safety and efficacy data at the OBD/RP2D. Results: As of data cutoff of 7/24/2023, 26 pts with R/R AL (24 AML; 2 ALL) are enrolled; 7 remain on study treatment. Baseline characteristics include 17(65%) males and 9(35%) females with a median age of 57.5 years (range 33-84). There is a median of 4 (range 1-8) prior lines of therapy and 11 (42%) with prior HSCT(s). Six pts (23%) had KMT2Ar, 3 (12%) KMT2A-PTD, 4 (15%) NPM1, and 13 (50%) WT for KMT2A and NPM1. Dosing began with single-patient cohorts at 100 mg QD (Arm A) and 25 mg QD (Arm B) and has been escalated through 4 dose levels. Thus far, pts have been dosed up to 500 mg QD (Arm A) and 125 mg QD (Arm B). BMF-219 exposures were comparable between arms, with ~2-4-fold higher exposures observed with co-administration of a moderate or strong CYP3A4 inhibitor. At the highest dose (DL4) in which PK was evaluated, Arm A (500 mg QD) and Arm B (125 mg QD), pts on average achieved ~50% of target exposure (2000 ng*hr/mL) with some pts surpassing it. Higher QD dosing or corresponding BID dosing is expected to achieve desired exposure. BMF-219 has generally been well tolerated with no DLTs observed and no discontinuations due to treatment-related toxicities. No related QTc prolongation was observed. At the time of data cutoff, 23 of 26 pts were included in the safety population. Common TRAEs (≥10%) include vomiting 13% (3) and Differentiation Syndrome (DS) 13% (3). No Grade 5 TRAEs were reported. The only common Grade ≥3 TRAE (≥5%) was DS 13% (3). The efficacy evaluable population includes AML pts who meet the following criteria: dosed at or near predicted efficacious dose (500 mg or above [Arm A]; 125 mg or above [Arm B]), had known menin-dependent mutations, and completed at least one scheduled response assessment (or had a minimum of 7 doses if discontinued prematurely). Thus far, 2 of 5 efficacy evaluable patients achieved a complete remission (1 CR; 1 CRi) and both continue BMF-219 treatment. Patient A: 39/M, NUP98-NSD1, ECOG=0, 500 mg QD, Arm A, 4 prior lines of treatment including intensive chemotherapy and allo-HSCT. At C1D27, marrow blasts were reduced to 6% from 13% at study entry. The patient achieved CR at C2D28 with 0% blasts.Patient B: 70/F, NPM1m, ECOG=1, 125 mg QD, Arm B, 1 prior line of treatment with decitabine and an investigational agent. At C1D28, marrow blasts were reduced to 34% from 52% at study entry. The patient achieved CRi with 3% blasts at C2D28. Conclusion: BMF-219 is generally well tolerated with no DLT observed (and able to be taken with and without CYP3A4 inhibitors) with no pts discontinuing therapy due to toxicity. BMF-219 dose escalation is ongoing and approaching target exposure. BMF-219 demonstrates early signs of clinical activity in different genomic subgroups. The trial is ongoing and includes enrollment for pts diagnosed with AL, DLBCL, MM and CLL.

Venetoclax Combined with Hag Regimen in Newly Diagnosed ETP-ALL: Interim Analysis of a Prospective, Multicenter, Phase 2 Trial

Background: Early T-cell precursor (ETP) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is identified as a subset of T-lineage ALL with a unique immunophenotype and genome profile in 2009. Patients with ETP-ALL have a relatively poor outcome with standard chemotherapy and studies showed that therapies utilized for myeloid neoplasms may be effective in ETP-ALL given the relatively high frequency of molecular myeloid features. In recent years, targeting of the antiapoptotic protein BCL-2 has emerged as an effective approach in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Preclinical studies reported that ETP-ALL cells also express high level of BCL-2 and are sensitive to the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN). However, the clinical efficacy of venetoclax combination therapies in ETP-ALL patients is still limited. Our data showed that homoharringtonine (HHT) showed strong synergistic effect with VEN in ETP-ALL (2022 ASH abstract #170604). We therefore conducted a study of combination of VEN and HHT-based HAG regimen (V-HAG regimen) in newly diagnosed ETP-ALL patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the activity and tolerability of V-HAG regimen for newly diagnosed ETP-ALL. Methods: In this prospective, multicenter, phase 2 clinical trial conducted in 7 different hematological centers in China, eligible patients were newly diagnosed ETP-ALL(aged≥16 years old) based on the 2016 WHO classification with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. Patients received venetoclax (100mg on day1, 200mg on day 2 and 400mg on day 3-14, if the blast cells in bone marrow was more than 5% on day 14, the patient continued to receive venetoclax 400mg until day 28), homoharringtonine (1.4 mg/m 2,2mg maximum daily, intravenously daily from on d1-10), Low-dose cytarabine (10 mg/m2 subcutaneously every 12h on d1-14), and G-CSF (100ug/m 2 daily on d1-14). Venetoclax dose was reduced by at least 50% in the patients receiving concomitant moderate or strong CYP3A4 inhibitors (such as azole antifungals et al). The primary endpoint was the rate of composite complete remission (CRc) after one cycle of induction treatment, including CR and CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi). Secondary endpoints included bone marrow (BM) minimal residual disease (MRD) by flow cytometry after one cycle of induction treatment, overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and adverse events (AEs). Here, we report results of the interim analysis. Results: Between July 2022 and July 2023, we enrolled 18 patients with newly diagnosed ETP-ALL in 7 different hematological centers. 14 of 18 patients (77.8%) were male and 22.2% were female, with a median age of 51 years (range, 29 to 73 years). As of July 31, 2023, 15 patients were available for the assessment of treatment results. Among the 15 patients, 14 patients were given standard V-HAG regimen as showed above and one 73-year-old patient, who had interstitial pneumonia at the onset of ETP-ALL, was given dose-reduced V-HAG regimen. To our surprise, after the first cycle of treatment with V-HAG, all the 15 patients achieved CRc (100% CRc rate), including the 73-year-old patient with dose-reduced regimen. Then, after one to three cycles of consolidation treatment with V-HAG regimen, 7 of 15 patients have proceeded to allo-HSCT so far. With a median follow-up of 7.7 months, both the median OS and EFS were not achieved. In fact, to date, except for the 73-year-old patient who eventually relapsed (6% blasts in BM after receiving a second cycle of dose-reduced V-HAG regimen as consolidation) and died of respiratory failure, all the other 14 patients are remaining alive and event-free. For the adverse events, the most common toxicities were grade 4 neutropenia (93.33%), grade 4 thrombocytopenia (73.33%) and grade 3 febrile neutropenia (26.67%). No early death occurred. Conclusions: Venetoclax Combined with HAG regimen achieved an 100% CRc rate in newly diagnosed ETP-ALL to date. Enrollment is ongoing to assess its efficacy and safety in treating newly diagnosed ETP-ALL. This therapy is a promising and well-tolerated regimen in newly diagnosed ETP-ALL patients. Trial registration: The trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Register with the registration number ChiCTR2200061708.

Phase 2 Study of CPX-351 in Combination with Venetoclax in Patients with Newly Diagnosed, High Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Background CPX-351 is a nanoscale liposome of a fixed 5:1 molar ratio of cytarabine and daunorubicin which has improved survival of secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) 1. Venetoclax (ven) is a BCL2 inhibitor which, in combination with azacitidine or cytarabine, has become the standard of care for elderly AML. Ven has shown synergism with chemotherapy, with high complete remission (CR) rates in newly diagnosed (ND) and relapsed / refractory (RR) AML 2. In this study, we aim to assess the efficacy and safety of CPX-351 and ven (CPX-ven) in RR and ND AML. Methods This was a phase 2 study with a lead-in safety phase. Enrolment was allowed if the blasts were ≥10%. Patients (pts) age ≥18 with RR AML were eligible for the safety lead-in phase (LIP) or arm A. Arm B enrolled pts age 18 - 69 with ND AML. Other inclusion criteria included adequate liver, renal and cardiac function, and ECOG performance status ≤2. Pts with CNS involvement or prior CPX-351 were excluded. The recommend phase 2 dose was CPX-351 (daunorubicin 44 mg/m 2 and cytarabine 100 mg/m 2 IV on D1, 3 and 5 of induction, and daunorubicin 22 mg/m2 IV on D1 and 3 during consolidation) combined with ven on D2-8 of each cycle. Ven was dosed at 300mg daily and reduced to 150mg or 50mg daily for pts on a moderate or strong CYP3A inhibitors, respectively. The primary outcome measure was complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi). Here, we report the outcomes of arm B including pts with ND AML. Results 14 pts were enrolled on arm B. One pt withdrew and one was too early in treatment, therefore 12 were evaluable. Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. The median age was 59.5 years (range, 44 - 69); Four (33.3%) were female. All 12 (100%) pts were classified as adverse risk per the 2017 European Leukemia Net Guidelines. Two (16.7%) pts had treatment for a prior non-myeloid malignancy (therapy-related AML). Eight (66.7%) had an antecedent haematological disorder (secondary AML), of whom seven had treatment (median 1 line, range 1 - 2). Four (33.3%) pts had a complex karyotype, of whom three harbored a TP53 mutation. Nine (75.0%) pts achieved a response, including four CR (33.3%), five CRi (41.6%), and one induction mortality (8.3%) prior to disease assessment. 3/4 (75.0%) pts with complex cytogenetics (including 2/3 (66.7%) with a TP53 mutation) achieved a CR/CRi. Of the secondary AML pts with an evaluable response, 5/7 (71.4%) achieved a CR/CRi. Of the nine pts achieving CR/CRi, five (55.5%) were negative for minimal residual disease (MRD) by flow cytometry. The median number of cycles to CR/CRi was one (range 1 - 2). The median overall survival (OS) was 12.9 months (95% CI, 3.1 - not reached, NR, Figure 1). The median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 8.7 months (95% CI, 3.1 -NR). 7/9 (77.8%) of responding pts underwent an allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) after attaining CR/CRi. There were 90 adverse events (AE) in 10 (83.3%) pts. 80 (88.9%) were grade 1 or 2, 10 (11.1%) were grade ≥3. The most common AE was gastrointestinal with seven (7.8%) occurrences. Four (33.3%) pts developed grade ≥3 infections; of these, one (8.3%) died. The cause of death was neutropenic septic shock due to pneumonia. Conclusion CPX-ven is a feasible option for remission induction in pts with high-risk, newly diagnosed AML. The combination produced high rates of response and MRD negativity in a cohort of pts with adverse risk features, including pts with adverse karyotype and AML following prior HMA-based treatment, allowing them to proceed with SCT. Toxicities are as expected for an intensive chemotherapy regimen. Further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of this combination.

Population pharmacokinetics of mirvetuximab soravtansine in patients with folate receptor-α positive ovarian cancer: The antibody-drug conjugate, payload and metabolite.

Mirvetuximab soravtansine is a first-in-class antibody-drug conjugate recently approved for the treatment of folate receptor-α positive ovarian cancer. The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model to describe the concentration-time profiles of mirvetuximab soravtansine, the payload (DM4) and a metabolite (S-methyl-DM4). Mirvetuximab soravtansine was administered intravenously from 0.15 to 7mg/kg to 543 patients with predominantly platinum-resistant ovarian cancer in 3 clinical studies, and the plasma drug concentrations were analysed using a nonlinear mixed-effects modelling approach. Stepwise covariate modelling was performed to identify covariates. We developed a semi-mechanistic population pharmacokinetic model that included linear and nonlinear routes for the elimination of mirvetuximab soravtansine and a target compartment for the formation and disposition of the payload and metabolite in tumour cells. The clearance and volume of the central compartment were 0.0153 L/h and 2.63 L for mirvetuximab soravtansine, 8.83 L/h and 3.67 L for DM4, and 2.04 L/h and 6.3L for S-methyl-DM4, respectively. Body weight, serum albumin and age were identified as statistically significant covariates. Exposures in patients with renal or hepatic impairment and who used concomitant cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 inhibitors were estimated. There is no need for dose adjustment due to covariate effects for mirvetuximab soravtansine administered at the recommended dose of 6mg/kg based on adjusted ideal body weight. Dose adjustment is not required for patients with mild or moderate renal impairment, mild hepatic impairment, or when concomitant weak and moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors are used.

Impact of posaconazole and diltiazem on pharmacokinetics of encorafenib, a BRAF V600 kinase inhibitor for melanoma and colorectal cancer with BRAF mutations.

Encorafenib is a potent and selective ATP competitive inhibitor of BRAF V600-mutant kinase approved for patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma and colorectal cancer. Encorafenib is mainly metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 invitro and may be susceptible to drug-drug interactions when co-administered with CYP3A inhibitors or inducers. The primary objective was to assess the impact of the strong CYP3A inhibitor posaconazole (part 1) and the moderate CYP3A and P-gp inhibitor diltiazem (part 2) on encorafenib pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers following a single 50-mg dose. A total of 32 participants were enrolled (16 each in parts 1 and 2). The area under the curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf ) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) geometric mean for encorafenib increased by 183% and 68.4%, respectively, when co-administered with posaconazole. Apparent encorafenib clearance decreased from 26.0 to 9.2 L/h when coadministered with posaconazole, and plasma terminal half-life (t½ ) of encorafenib increased from 4.3 to 7.3 h. The AUCinf and Cmax geometric mean for encorafenib increased by 83.0% and 44.7%, respectively, when co-administered with diltiazem. Similarly, the apparent encorafenib clearance decreased from 29.0 to 16.0 L/h when co-administered with diltiazem, and plasma t½ of encorafenib increased from 6.6 to 7.9 h. There were no deaths, serious adverse events (AEs), or patient discontinuations due to AEs in parts 1 or 2. The most frequently reported treatment-related AEs were erythema (n = 14; 88%) and headache (n = 11; 69%) in part 1 and headache (n = 7; 44%) in part 2. The results of this study indicate that co-administration of encorafenib with strong or moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors should be avoided.

Covalent-103: A Phase 1, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, and Dose-Expansion Study of Bmf-500, an Oral Covalent FLT3 Inhibitor, in Adults with Acute Leukemia (AL)

Background: FLT3 mutations occur in 25-35% of patients with AML and are associated with poor prognosis. FLT3 mutations are most frequently the result of an internal tandem duplication (ITD) of amino acids in the juxtamembrane region of FLT3 or point mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain (TKD). FLT3-ITD mutations are associated with increased incidence of relapse, shorter duration of remission, and decreased disease-free and overall survival. BMF-500 is a novel orally bioavailable, highly potent and selective covalent inhibitor of FLT3 including wildtype (WT), ITD, TKD, as well as a variety of additional resistance-conferring mutations such as the gatekeeper F691. BMF-500 has demonstrated high affinity for FLT3, lack of cKIT inhibition, and sustained cell-killing capacity despite drug washout (Law et al., ASH 2022 Abstract 2756). BMF-500 has shown sustained tumor regression and improved survival in both subcutaneous and disseminated xenograft models of mutant FLT3-driven AML. Study Design: COVALENT-103 (NCT05918692) is an open-label, non-randomized, multicenter, first-in-human Phase I study evaluating the safety, tolerability, and clinical activity of escalating doses of twice daily oral BMF-500 in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) AL, including AML, ALL, or MPAL, with or without FLT3 mutations. The trial has 2 arms that will undergo dose escalation in parallel: Arm A (without) and Arm B (with) concomitant use of a moderate or strong CYP3A4 inhibitor. Utilizing an accelerated titration design (ATD), doses of BMF-500 will be escalated in single-subject cohorts until 1 subject experiences either a Grade 2 or higher related-adverse event or dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). At that point, the cohort will switch to a classical “3 +3” design. Patients with WT FLT3 AL may be enrolled, up to a limit of 33% per arm. Treatment will continue in 28-day cycles until progression or intolerability. Expansion cohorts will enroll additional patients to obtain further safety and efficacy data. Patients must be refractory, relapsed or must have progressed on or following discontinuation of the most recent anti-cancer therapy or be ineligible for any approved standard of care therapies, including HSCT. Participants with FLT3-mutant AML must have received treatment with a FLT3 inhibitor approved for treatment of relapsed or refractory FLT3-mutant AML. Key inclusion criteria include ECOG PS ≤ 2, adequate organ function, and documented FLT3 mutation status. Key exclusion criteria include known CNS disease involvement, clinically significant cardiovascular disease, and WBC count &amp;gt;50,000/µL (uncontrollable with cytoreductive therapy). Objectives: The primary objective of the study is to evaluate safety and tolerability and to determine the optimal biological dose (OBD)/ recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of BMF-500 oral monotherapy based on evaluation of available PK/ PD, safety and efficacy data. Secondary objectives include characterization of the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of BMF-500, and assessment of its antitumor activity per modified Cheson (2003) criteria or the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines (ALL Version 1.2022) as determined by the investigator. Endpoints include best overall response rate (ORR), complete remission (CRc), duration of response (DOR), relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The study was initiated in July 2023 and will enroll ~110 participants at approximately 30 sites.