Moderate Asthma Exacerbations Research Articles

Emergency physicians’ preferences in bronchodilator delivery for asthma exacerbations: a cross-sectional study

Objective Asthma is a chronic respiratory disorder characterized by airway inflammation and narrowing often leading to acute exacerbations that necessitate a visit to the emergency department (ED). While life threatening cases usually require bronchodilator delivery by nebulizers, mild to moderate acute asthma exacerbations can be treated by bronchodilators delivered either by metered dose inhalers (MDI). Numerous studies have attempted to compare between the two modalities and have drawn similar conclusions in that both are comparable in efficacy with minimal differences. What is evident, however, is that physicians remain inclined to favor nebulizers in the majority of acute asthma exacerbations. Methods In this questionnaire-based study, a survey was distributed to physicians who treat asthma exacerbations to examine demographics, knowledge, beliefs, and current practice in regard to bronchodilator therapy. Results The majority (90.8%) of physicians prefer short-acting beta agonists via nebulizer, with 9.2% favoring MDI + spacer. Participants include consultants, residents, and specialists across various emergency disciplines. While 90.1% find MDI + spacer equally effective as nebulizers, advantages cited include cost-effectiveness (49.6%), shorter ED stays (63.4%), quicker administration (67.9%), and ease of use (58.8%). Challenges include availability (66.4%) and ineffectiveness in younger patients (45%). Despite this, 65.6% are willing to switch to MDI for initial asthma management in the ED, while 34.4% are resistant. Conclusion Concerns about availability and effectiveness in younger patients remain barriers. However, a significant number are willing to adopt MDIs with spacers, indicating potential for broader use with better availability and training.

Influenza A (H1N1) in Hospitalized Children.

Influenza A (H1N1) is a contagious respiratory infection caused by the influenza A virus. In the majority of cases, H1N1 influenza is benign. However, it can be dangerous for infants and children with underlying chronic diseases. The severity of influenza depends on various factors, including the virulence of the virus strain, preexisting immunity level, and individual health conditions. The aim of this study is to describe the clinical profile of H1N1 influenza in hospitalized infants and children. This is a prospective and descriptive study conducted from November 1, 2018, to January 31, 2024. In this study, we included all children under 14 years old hospitalized for suspected severe lower respiratory infection who had gone through virological testing. We used a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) kit: the Film Array-Respiratory Panel. Due to the depletion of multiplex PCR kits, this study continued using rapid influenza diagnostic tests based on immunochromatographic technique. We report 45 confirmed cases of H1N1 influenza, collected during the period from November 1, 2018, to January 31, 2024. The average age was 2 years and 4 months. The main reason for admission was respiratory distress found in all patients. In 53% of the cases, there was an associated comorbidity, including asthma (17 cases), prematurity (2 cases), congenital adrenal hyperplasia (2 cases), cystic fibrosis (1 case), undetermined etiology bronchial dilation (1 case), and Basedow's disease (1 case). The clinical presentation included viral bronchiolitis (17 cases), moderate asthma exacerbation (10 cases), severe asthma exacerbation (7 cases), pneumonia (9 cases), bronchial dilation exacerbation (1 case), and flu-like syndrome with adrenal insufficiency (1 case). Fever was present in 31 patients. Gastrointestinal symptoms such as diarrhea and vomiting were present in 20 cases. Three patients required intensive care, with 2 children being intubated and ventilated (one severe acute asthma and one severe viral bronchiolitis). Two cases were treated with oseltamivir. The average length of hospital stay was 7.5 days, ranging from 3 to 20 days. All cases showed favorable evolution. We conclude that preventive measures remain crucial, and influenza vaccination is highly recommended in cases of underlying morbidity.

Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis with ophthalmic involvement: A Case report and Literature Review

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA), previously known as Churg-Strauss syndrome, is a systemic necrotizing vasculitis primarily affecting small blood vessels. It is characterized by extravascular eosinophilic granulomas, peripheral eosinophilia, and often coexists with asthma. This rare condition can affect individuals of any gender and age, presenting with a variety of multisystemic symptoms. Prognosis is largely influenced by cardiac involvement, evaluated using the Five-Factor Score (FFS) to guide treatment decisions. Respiratory manifestations, particularly severe and corticosteroid-dependent asthma, are common in EGPA and may aid in its early diagnosis. In this case report, we describe a patient with an uncontrolled asthma admitted for moderate asthma exacerbation. Clinical examination revealed ocular redness and skin lesions, along with hypereosinophilia on assessment and reticulo-micronodular infiltrates on chest CT scan. EGPA diagnosis was confirmed based on the ACR 1990 criteria, wich have been updated and substituted with more objective criteria in 2022. According to the FFS score, the patient underwent systemic corticosteroid therapy in conjunction with azathioprine, leading to an overall favorable outcome over a 3-year follow-up period.

Characterization of Moderate and Severe Asthma Exacerbations in the CAPTAIN Study

BackgroundLimited data exist on the relative impact of moderate and severe exacerbations on asthma control and impairment. ObjectiveTo explore data from the CAPTAIN trial to evaluate the relationship between first moderate or severe exacerbation and changes in lung function, symptoms, physical activity limitation scores, and short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) usage to determine the clinical relevance of moderate events. MethodsCAPTAIN was a Phase IIIA 24–52-week, multicenter, international, randomized controlled trial evaluating efficacy and safety of fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) versus FF/VI in patients with uncontrolled asthma on inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist. Outcomes reportedinclude: first post-randomization exacerbation event by severity (Weeks 1–52), frequency and duration of moderate and severe exacerbations and time course of changes over ±14-day peri-exacerbation period for lung function, symptoms, limitations, and SABA use. ResultsOf the intent-to-treat population (N=2436), 550 patients (23%) continued to 52 weeks. There were 529 moderate and 546 severe exacerbations. Lung function changes were similar, but symptom, physical activity limitation scores, and SABA use were higher, for severe versus moderate exacerbations. Lung function decline preceded increases in symptom, physical activity limitation scores, and SABA use, irrespective of exacerbation severity. Lung function variables, limitation scores, and SABA use returned to pre-exacerbation baseline after ∼8–12 days for both exacerbation severities. ConclusionWhile severe events were associated with greater impact on symptoms, physical activity limitations, and SABA use, onset and time to resolution were generally similar for moderate and severe events. Both exacerbation severities represent clinically important deteriorations comprising clinical and functional changes. NCT02924688.

Inhaled magnesium versus inhaled salbutamol in rescue treatment for moderate and severe asthma exacerbations in pediatric patients

ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of inhaled Magnesium Sulfate associated with Salbutamol versus Inhaled Salbutamol alone in patients with moderate and severe asthma exacerbations. MethodClinical, prospective and randomized study with patients between 3 and 14 years of age divided into two groups: one to receive inhaled salbutamol associated with magnesium sulfate (GSM), the other to receive inhaled salbutamol alone (GS). The sample consisted of 40 patients, 20 patients in each group. Severity was classified using the modified Wood-Downes score, with values between 4 and 7 classified as moderate and 8 or more classified as severe. ResultsPost-inhalation scores decreased both in patients who received salbutamol and magnesium and in those who received salbutamol alone, with no statistically significant difference between the groups. ConclusionsDespite the benefits when administered intravenously, inhalation of the drug alone or in combination did not reduce the severity of the exacerbation.

Continuous infusion of magnesium sulfate to treat acute severe asthma in a Brazilian pediatric emergency department

Purpose: Magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) emerged as an adjunctive therapy to help manage acute severe asthma refractory to the first-line therapy, such as oxygen, ipratropium, corticosteroids, and bronchodilators. Despite the known benefits of MgSO4, limited information is available regarding potential adverse effects (AEs). We aimed to investigate potential AEs and clinical response of intravenous MgSO4 by assessing vital signs and the modified Wood-Downes score (mWDS), a relevant clinical scoring system. Methods: This investigation constitutes a prospective, single-arm study, conducted from June 2022 through May 2023, in a pediatric emergency department of the quaternary public hospital in Brazil. This study included all children aged 3-14 years who visited the pediatric emergency department during the period and underwent a 6-hour continuous infusion of MgSO4 at 50 mg/kg/hour, against acute severe asthma, a case refractory to the first-line therapies. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the infusion by using vital signs and the mWDS. Clinical response was defined as a reduction of at least 1 point in the scoring system.Results: We analyzed a total of 42 children including 24 boys (57.1%), whose mean age was 5.7 ± 2.4 years. The 6-hour continuous infusion of MgSO4 reduced mWDS from 3 (interquartile range, 3-4) to 2 (2-3) (P < 0.001) and resulted in the clinical response in 30 children (71.4%) without an AE. After the infusion, 13 of the 15 children (86.7%) classified as having moderate asthma exacerbation (mWDS, 4-6) were improved to having mild asthma exacerbation (mWDS, 1-3) (P < 0.001). The mean serum magnesium concentration after the infusion was 4.7 mg/dL. Pneumonia and viral infection did not predict the clinical response.Conclusion: This study indicates the safety and efficacy of the 6-hour continuous infusion of MgSO4 as a therapeutic option for acute severe asthma, which is refractory to the first-line therapy.

Development and validation of a claims-based algorithm to identify moderate exacerbations in patients with asthma treated in the US

IntroductionDefinitions of moderate asthma exacerbation have been inconsistent, making their economic burden difficult to assess. An algorithm to accurately identify moderate exacerbations from claims data is needed. MethodsA retrospective cohort study of Reliant Medical Group patients aged ≥18 years, with ≥1 prescription claim for inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist, and ≥1 medical claim with a diagnosis code for asthma was conducted. The objective was to refine current algorithms to identify moderate exacerbations in claims data and assess the refined algorithm's performance. Positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were assessed via chart review of 150 moderate exacerbations events and 50 patients without exacerbations. Sensitivity analyses assessed alternative algorithms and compared healthcare resource utilization (HRU) between algorithm-identified patients (claims group) and those confirmed by chart review (confirmed group) to have experienced a moderate exacerbation. ResultsAlgorithm-identified moderate exacerbations were: visit of ≤1 day with an asthma exacerbation diagnosis OR visit of ≤1 day with selected asthma diagnoses AND ≥1 respiratory pharmacy claim, excluding systemic corticosteroids, within 14 days after the first claim. The algorithm's PPV was 42%; the NPV was 78%. HRU was similar for both groups. ConclusionThis algorithm identified potential moderate exacerbations from claims data; however, the modest PPV underscores its limitations in identifying moderate exacerbations, although performance was partially due to identification of previously unidentified severe exacerbations. Application of this algorithm in future claims-based studies may help quantify the economic burden of moderate and severe exacerbations in asthma when an algorithm identifying severe exacerbations is applied first.

START CARE: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial of step-wise budesonide-formoterol reliever-based treatment in children.

Asthma is the most common chronic childhood respiratory condition globally. Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-formoterol reliever-based regimens reduce the risk of asthma exacerbations compared with conventional short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) reliever-based regimens in adults and adolescents. The current limited evidence for anti-inflammatory reliever therapy in children means it is unknown whether these findings are also applicable to children. High-quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are needed. The study aim is to determine the efficacy and safety of budesonide-formoterol reliever alone or maintenance and reliever therapy (MART) compared with standard therapy: budesonide or budesonide-formoterol maintenance, both with terbutaline reliever, in children aged 5 to 11 years with mild, moderate and severe asthma. A 52-week, multicentre, open-label, parallel group, phase III, two-sided superiority RCT will recruit 400 children aged 5 to 11 years with asthma. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to either budesonide-formoterol 100/6 µg Turbuhaler reliever alone or MART; or budesonide or budesonide-formoterol Turbuhaler maintenance, with terbutaline Turbuhaler reliever. The primary outcome is moderate and severe asthma exacerbations as rate per participant per year. Secondary outcomes are asthma control, lung function, exhaled nitric oxide and treatment step change. Assessment of Turbuhaler technique and cost-effectiveness analysis are also planned. This will be the first RCT to compare the efficacy and safety of a step-wise budesonide-formoterol reliever alone or MART regimen with conventional inhaled ICS or ICS-long-acting β-agonist maintenance plus SABA reliever in children. The results will provide a much-needed evidence base for the treatment of asthma in children.

Impact of a discharge prescription for dexamethasone on outcomes of children treated in the emergency department for acute asthma exacerbations

Objective To evaluate dexamethasone prescribing practices, patient adherence, and outcomes by dosing regimen in children with acute asthma discharged from the emergency department (ED). Study design Prospective study of children 2–18 years treated with dexamethasone for acute asthma prior to discharge from an urban, tertiary care ED between 2018 and 2022. Demographics, clinical characteristics, ED treatment, and discharge prescriptions were collected via chart review. The exposure was discharge prescription (additional dose) versus no discharge prescription for dexamethasone. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as return ED visit, unplanned primary care visit, and/or ongoing bronchodilator use. Secondary outcomes included medication adherence, symptom persistence, quality-of-life, and school/work absenteeism. Outcomes were assessed by telephone 7–10 days after discharge. Results 564 subjects were enrolled; 338 caregivers (60%) completed follow-up. Children were a median age 7 years, 30% Black or African American, 49% Hispanic, and 79% had public insurance. A discharge prescription for dexamethasone was written for 482 (86%) children and was significantly associated with exacerbation severity, number of combined albuterol/ipratropium treatments, and longer length of stay. There was no difference in treatment failure between the discharge prescription and no discharge prescription groups (RR 0.87; 0.67, 1.12), including after adjusting for potential confounders; there was no difference between groups in secondary outcomes. Conclusions Prescription for an additional dexamethasone dose was not associated with reduced treatment failure or improved outcomes for children with acute asthma discharged from the ED. Single, ED-dose of dexamethasone prior to discharge may be sufficient for children with mild to moderate asthma exacerbations.

Validation of the Paediatric Asthma Score (PAS) in Evaluation of Acute Exacerbation of Asthma in Children

Introduction: Assessing the severity of acute asthma objectively is important to guide treatment. Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) is used for this. Paediatric Asthma Score (PAS) is a user-friendly asthma score in children. Our aim was to validate the efficacy of PAS in comparison with PEFR for assessing severity of acute asthma.
 Methods: The study included 32 children in the age group of five to 14 years, with mild to moderate asthma exacerbation. The PEFR and the PAS were measured before treatment, 15 min, 30 min, and one hour after treatment, and at discharge. Paired t-test was used to establish construct validity by comparing pre-and post-treatment PEFR and PAS. The criterion validity was calculated by correlating pre-and post-treatment PASs with PEFRs.
 Results: The mean predicted PEFR improved with treatment by 22.35% (p < 0.001) by one hour. Pre- and post-treatment PASs significantly correlated with PEFRs. The correlation of pre-treatment PEFR and PAS was r = -0.491 (p = 0.004), that for post-treatment at 1hour was r = -0.505 (p = 0.003).
 Conclusions: The study validities the PAS as a measure of severity of asthma. The PAS is thus a simple alternative to the PEFR to estimate airway obstruction in children within the age group to five to 14 years with acute asthma exacerbations.

Efficacy of mometasone/indacaterol/glycopyrronium in patients with inadequately controlled asthma with respect to baseline eosinophil count: Post hoc analysis of IRIDIUM study

BackgroundBaseline characteristics could potentially guide asthma treatments. We evaluated whether baseline eosinophil levels affect the efficacy of mometasone/indacaterol/glycopyrronium (MF/IND/GLY) in patients with inadequately controlled asthma. MethodIn this post hoc analysis of IRIDIUM study, efficacy of high-dose MF/IND/GLY (160/150/50 μg, once-daily [o.d.]) versus high-dose MF/IND (320/150 μg o.d.) and high-dose fluticasone/salmeterol (FLU/SAL [500/50 μg, twice-daily [b.i.d.]); and efficacy of pooled MF/IND/GLY (160/150/50 μg and 80/150/50 μg) versus pooled MF/IND (320/150 μg and 160/150 μg) was evaluated in patient subgroups with baseline blood eosinophil count of <300 cells/μL or ≥300 cells/μL. ResultsOverall, 3065 patients were included. At Week 26, high-dose MF/IND/GLY showed improved trough FEV1 versus high-dose MF/IND (Δ78mL [<300 cells/μL]; Δ54mL [≥300 cells/μL]) and FLU/SAL (Δ112mL [<300 cells/μL]; Δ98mL [≥300 cells/μL]). Similarly, pooled MF/IND/GLY also showed improved trough FEV1 versus pooled MF/IND (Δ75mL [<300 cells/μL]; Δ68mL [≥300 cells/μL]).Over 52 weeks, high-dose MF/IND/GLY reduced the annualized rate of moderate or severe asthma exacerbations by 23% and 10%, severe exacerbations by 31% and 15%, and all exacerbation by 33% and 10% versus high-dose MF/IND for subgroups with <300 cells/μL and ≥300 cells/μL, respectively; and by 33% and 41%, 45% and 42%, 42% and 39% versus FLU/SAL, respectively. Similarly, pooled MF/IND/GLY reduced exacerbations by 22% and 8%, 21% and 7%, 27% and 8%, versus pooled MF/IND, for the respective subgroups. ConclusionMF/IND/GLY showed improvement in lung function and reduction in asthma exacerbations over MF/IND and FLU/SAL independent of baseline eosinophil levels, indicating that eosinophil levels did not affect the efficacy of MF/IND/GLY in patients with inadequately controlled asthma. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02571777 (IRIDIUM).

Is exposure to pollen a risk factor for moderate and severe asthma exacerbations?

Limited number of studies have focused on the impact of pollen exposure on asthma. As a part of the EAACI Guidelines on Environment Science, this first systematic review on the relationship of pollen exposure to asthma exacerbations aimed to bridge this knowledge gap in view of implementing recommendations of prevention. We searched electronic iPubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases using a set of MeSH terms and related synonyms and identified 73 eligible studies that were included for systemic review. When possible, meta-analyses were conducted. Overall meta-analysis suggests that outdoor pollen exposure may have an effect on asthma exacerbation, but caution is needed due to the low number of studies and their heterogeneity. The strongest associations were found between asthma attacks, asthma-related ED admissions or hospitalizations, and an increase in grass pollen concentration in the previous 2-day overall in children aged less than 18 years of age. Tree pollen may increase asthma-related ED visits or admissions lagged up to 7-day overall in individuals younger than 18 years. Rare data show that among subjects under 18 years of age, an exposure to grass pollen lagged up to 3 days may lower lung function. Further research considering effect modifiers of pollen sensitization, hay fever, asthma, air pollution, green spaces, and pre-existing medications is urgently warranted to better evaluate the impacts of pollen on asthma exacerbation. Preventive measures in relation to pollen exposure should be integrated in asthma control as pollen increase continues due to climate change.

Can patients achieve sufficient peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) with Turbuhaler® during acute exacerbation of asthma?

Introduction Anti-inflammatory reliever (AIR) with or without regular maintenance delivered through Turbuhaler® has been widely recommended in the GINA strategy document. These patients are not prescribed with additional reliever inhalers, but dependent on Turbuhaler® during acute asthma episodes. The peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR) is crucial in drug delivery from a dry powder inhaler (DPI) such as Turbuhaler®. Despite its increasing usage, there are some concerns that patients on Turbuhaler® are not able to achieve adequate PIFR during acute exacerbation of asthma. Objective This study aimed to assess the PIFR at resistance settings that matched Turbuhaler® in patients with acute exacerbation of asthma. Methodology A six-month cross-sectional study was conducted at the Emergency Department (ED) of Hospital Sultanah Bahiyah and Hospital Kulim, Kedah, Malaysia. Adult patients diagnosed with mild to moderate acute exacerbations of asthma were recruited. The PIFRs were measured using the In-Check DIAL G16 that was set to simulate the resistance of Turbuhaler® (R3). The PIFRs were assessed before (pre) and after (post) the initial bronchodilator (BD) treatment at the ED. The minimal required PIFR was defined as flow rates ≥ 30 L/min while a PIFR of 60 L/min was considered as optimal. Results A total of 151 patients (81 females and 70 males) were recruited. The mean age was 37.5 years old with a range between 18 and 79 years old. The results showed that 98% (n = 148) of patients managed to achieve the minimal PIFR required for pre-BD. The mean PIFR pre-BD was 60 ± 18.5 L/min and post-BD was 70 ± 18.5 L/min. Furthermore, more than half (54%, n = 82) of the patients recorded PIFR ≥ 60 L/min during pre-BD, and about three-quarters (71%, n = 92) achieved PIFR ≥ 60 L/min post-BD. The PIFR showed a moderate correlation with peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) (r = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.43–0.65, p < 0.001). Conclusion The majority of patients with asthma in the present study were able to achieve sufficient PIFR from Turbuhaler® during mild to moderate acute exacerbations.

Indoor Aeroallergen Sensitization and Associated Factors in Hospitalized Children with Asthma Exacerbations.

Allergic asthma represents the most popular phenotype of childhood asthma and is characterized by eosinophilic airway inflammation associated with specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies sensitization to various allergens, as evidenced by serology or skin prick test.2 Sensitization to indoor aeroallergens is associated with severe asthma and severe asthma exacerbations. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of aeroallergen sensitization and its associated factors in children with an asthma exacerbation in Vietnam. A cross-sectional study was conducted at Children's Hospital 1, Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC). Children who were aged 3 to 15 and admitted to the hospital with moderate or severe asthma exacerbation were recruited to the study. Data was collected from interviews and medical records. SPT was used to identify aeroallergen sensitization. The association between school-age, living area, and passive smoking with the odds of aeroallergen sensitization was assessed using a multivariable logistic regression. The prevalence of aeroallergen sensitization was 82.6% and this figure in school-age children was higher than that in preschool-age ones (93.8% vs 72.1%, p=0.001). School-age, living in HCMC, and passive smoking significantly increased the odds of aeroallergen sensitization in asthmatic children with adjusted OR [95%CI] as 6.9 [2.1-23.3], 4.1 [1.5-11.5], and 2.9 [1.0-8.4], respectively. Asthmatic children with aeroallergen sensitization required more hours to resolve an asthma exacerbation than those without (22.4 vs 15.2, p=0.006). Aeroallergen sensitization was common in hospitalized children with moderate or severe asthma exacerbation. It is necessary to establish environmental policy and screening practices of aeroallergen sensitization to improve the quality of asthma management for Vietnamese children.

Virus infection and severe asthma exacerbations: A cross-sectional study in Children’s Hospital 1, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Context: Virus infection is a well-known risk factor for asthma exacerbations in temperate and subtropical countries, particularly in atopic children. However, the risk has not been well-described in tropical countries including Vietnam. Aims: To compare the odds of virus infection in hospitalized children with severe versus moderate asthma exacerbations. Settings and Design: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Children’s Hospital 1, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Children who were admitted to the hospital and diagnosed with severe or moderate asthma exacerbations were recruited for the study. Materials and Methods: Data were collected from interviews and medical records. Virus infection was confirmed by multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction. Inhalant allergy was confirmed by a skin prick test with common indoor aeroallergens. Statistical Analysis Used: Associations among age, gender, passive smoking, child’s history of eczema, family history of asthma, virus infection, and inhalant allergy with the odds of severe asthma exacerbations were tested by binary logistic regressions. Multivariable logistic regression was done to measure the association between virus infection with the odds of severe asthma exacerbations adjusted for passive smoking. The odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were reported to show the strength of the associations. Results: Nearly half of the children were infected by a virus (48.5%) and had passive smoking (49.2%). The percentage of children with a positive skin prick test was 83%. The most common indoor aeroallergen was house dust mites (81.1%). The odds of severe asthma exacerbations in children with virus infection was three times higher than that in those without virus infection (OR: 3.21, 95% CI: 1.20‐8.60, P = 0.021). Conclusions: Immunization and other healthcare programs should be deployed to prevent asthmatic children from virus infection and passive smoking to reduce the risk of severe asthma exacerbations.

Patient experience of moderate asthma attacks: qualitative research in the USA and Germany

BackgroundThere is limited information available on the impact of moderate asthma exacerbations, often called “asthma attacks” (i.e., those not requiring hospitalisation or treatment with systemic corticosteroids) on patients’ lives. This multi-country qualitative study explored the patient experience of these events.MethodsSemi-structured concept elicitation interviews were conducted in the USA and Germany with adult patients with asthma who had experienced a moderate asthma exacerbation in the prior 30 days. Physicians with experience in managing patients with asthma were also interviewed. Interviews explored patients’ experience of symptoms and impact of moderate exacerbations and associated exacerbation triggers and treatment patterns. Physicians were also asked about their interpretation of a clinical definition and treatment of a moderate exacerbation.ResultsTwenty-eight patient (n = 20 in the USA, n = 8 in Germany) and six physician (n = 3 in the USA, n = 3 in Germany) interviews were conducted. During their moderate exacerbation, all patients reported experiencing shortness of breath, which many considered to be severe and the most bothersome symptom. Wheezing was also reported by all patients and considered severe by two thirds of patients. Most patients also reported coughing and chest tightness. All or almost all patients reported that moderate exacerbation caused fatigue/tiredness and impacted their physical functioning, emotional functioning, activities of daily living and work/school life. Most patients reported using rescue or maintenance inhalers to alleviate symptoms of the exacerbation. Conceptual saturation (i.e., the point at which no new concepts are likely to emerge with continued data collection) was achieved. Findings were used to develop a patient-focused conceptual model of the experience of moderate asthma exacerbations, outlining concepts related to triggers, symptoms, impact, and treatment from the patient perspective. Physician data was consistent with patient reports and complemented the conceptual model.ConclusionsFindings from concept elicitation interviews highlight the increased frequency, duration and severity of asthma symptoms and increased rescue medication use during moderate asthma exacerbations compared with the typical daily asthma experience, which have a substantial impact on patients’ lives.

Single-Dose Dexamethasone Is Not Inferior to 2 Doses in Mild to Moderate Pediatric Asthma Exacerbations in the Emergency Department.

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of a single dose of dexamethasone to 2 doses of dexamethasone in treating mild to moderate asthma exacerbations in pediatric patients. We anticipated that there would not be a difference in the rate of return visits to the emergency department (ED), urgent care, or primary care physician for continued asthma symptoms. This was a prospective, randomized, single-center, unblinded, parallel-group randomized clinical trial of patients 2 to 20 years old presenting to a pediatric ED with mild to moderate asthma exacerbations. The patients were randomized to receive 1 or 2 doses of dexamethasone (0.6 mg/kg per dose, maximum of 16 mg). Telephone follow-up interviews were performed on the sixth day after ED visit. The primary outcome measures were return visits to either primary care physician or ED for continued asthma symptoms. Secondary outcomes were days of symptoms, missed school days, and adverse effects. Of the 318 children initially enrolled, 308 patients met the enrollment criteria. These patients were randomized into 2 groups. There were 116 patients in group 1 and 116 patients in group 2. There was no significant difference between groups regarding return visits (group 1, 12.1%; group 2, 10.3%; odds ratio [OR], 0.892 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.377-2.110]), days to symptom resolution (group 1, 2.4; group 2, 2.5; OR, 0.974 [95% 95% CI, 0.838-1.132]), missed school days (group 1, 47%; group 2, 51%; OR, 1.114 [95% CI, 0.613-2.023]), or vomiting (group 1, 8.6%; group 2, 3.4%; OR, 2.424 [95% CI, 0.637-9.228]). In this single-center, unblinded randomized trial of children and adolescents with mild to moderate acute exacerbations of asthma, there was no difference in the rate of return visits for continued or worsened symptoms between patients randomized to 1 or 2 doses of dexamethasone.

Severe lactic acidosis and persistent diastolic hypotension following standard dose of intermittent nebulized salbutamol in a child: a case report

BackgroundSalbutamol is a selective β2-receptor agonist widely used to treat asthma in both emergency and outpatient settings. However, it has been associated with a broad spectrum of side effects. Lactic acidosis and diastolic hypotension are rarely reported together following intermittent salbutamol nebulization in children, even less so at standard therapeutic doses.Case presentationWe present the case of a 12-year-old Italian boy, 34 kg body weight, who experienced a serious drug reaction during a moderate asthma exacerbation with associated dehydration (blood urea nitrogen/creatinine 0.25), following intermittent inhaled (0.2 mg at 3-hour intervals—overall 1.4 mg in 24 hours before arrival) and nebulized treatment (3.25 mg at 20-minute intervals in 60 minutes, overall 11.25 mg in our emergency department). The patient developed hyperglycemia (peak concentration 222 mg/dL), hypokalemia (lowest concentration 2.6 mEq/L), electrocardiogram alterations (corrected QT interval 467 ms), long-lasting arterial hypotension despite fluid boluses (lowest value 87/33 mmHg), and elevated blood lactate levels (peak concentration 8.1 mmol/L), following the third nebulized dose. Infections, liver dysfunction, and toxicity following other medications were ruled out. The aforementioned alterations improved within 24 hours after discontinuation of salbutamol.ConclusionsWe reinforce the message that even the use of intermittent nebulized salbutamol for acute moderate asthma can lead to severe transient complications in children. Then, healthcare providers should pay attention not only in emergency settings, to achieve prompt recognition and proper management of this adverse reaction. Careful reassessment could prevent similar reactions.

Effectiveness of Salbutamol Administered through a Metered-Dose Inhaler with Nebuliser amongst Children for Acute Asthma Treatment

Administration of salbutamol by metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with spacer is as effective as nebuliser in terms of clinical response and patient outcome. In addition, fewer side effects and lesser hospital admission rates are recorded with this method. Changing the practice of using nebuliser to MDI with spacer as the preferred mode of treatment for mild-to-moderate asthma has been studied. In this study, 68 children between the age groups of 5 and 18 years with mild-to-moderate severity of asthma admitted in the paediatric emergency service and the child health outpatient department were studied to compare the effect of salbutamol delivered via MDI with salbutamol through nebuliser for acute asthma treatment. In this study, 70 children with asthma were randomly allocated to the MDI and nebuliser groups. The standardised Modified Pulmonary Index Score was assessed by the clinical assessor before and 10 min after the intervention. The findings revealed that the clinical outcome was highly significant in both the groups. However, the feasibility of using MDI with spacer in comparison to nebuliser was found to be highly significant in relation to the effectiveness, utilisation of hospital resources (treatment preparation, delivery time and cost) and acceptability to patients. Results of the study carried out in the paediatric population indicate that MDI with spacer is as effective as nebuliser in the treatment of children with mild and moderate acute asthma exacerbations in the hospital setting. However, MDI with spacer has more additional benefits such as fewer side effects, less time consumed to administer the treatment, cost-effective, portable and easier to use than nebulisers.

To determine the association between asthma severity and hospital admission measured by Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) score at Indus Hospital and Health Network, Karachi, Pakistan, 2020-2021.

Objectives:To determine the association between asthma severity and the likelihood of hospitalization by using Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) score for pediatric patients who present to the emergency department (ED) with mild, moderate or severe asthma exacerbations and those who received standard intensive asthma therapy.Methods:This was a retrospective study conducted in children aged between 2 to 14 years. The data was entered and analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21. To be included in the study, the children must have received “intensive asthma therapy” defined as administration of systemic corticosteroids with three albuterol treatments and ipratropium.Results:A total of 437 patients were enrolled in the study out of which 250 were male and 187 were female. The mean age was 6.1 ± 3.4 years with a minimum age of two and a maximum age of 14 years. The 4-hour PRAM score (AUC = 0.88) overall significantly improved the predictive value of admission (p value <0.001) as compared to the PRAM score calculated at triage (AUC = 0.81).Conclusion:The 4-hour PRAM score is the best predictor for the need of hospitalization. It is suggested that these results are applied clinically in the pediatric ED to improve patient flow and to better facilitate intensive therapy of patients at triage to decrease the need for hospitalization.