In a recent paper, Merton (1975) seeks to extend the theory of growth under beyond the customary concern of demonstrating the existence, uniqueness, and stability of the asymptotic stationary distributions of consumption, output, and capital stock. His goal is to derive additional properties of these asymptotic distributions and, in particular, to investigate the (in an expected value sense) induced by assuming a certainty model when, in fact, outcomes are uncertain (Merton (1975, p. 375)). For his (only) source of uncertainty, Merton (1975) models the size of the aggregate labour force as a diffusion process. By further assuming the aggregate savings policy to be linear homogeneous in output, and specifying per worker output as being Cobb-Douglas in capital per worker, Merton (1975) is able to derive closed form expressions for the associated stationary distributions of per worker consumption, output, and capital stock. By comparing the expected values of these distributions with the corresponding steadystate values obtained by applying the identical savings rule to the same model specification, though in the absence of uncertainty, he demonstrates biases in the certainty estimates of the corresponding uncertainty expected values. Specifically, in his model, expected per worker consumption, output, and capital stock under strictly exceed their respective certainty levels. Merton (1975, p. 383) is therefore led to conclude that care must be taken in using the certainty analysis even as a first moment approximation theory. This note is an attempt to replicate Merton's (1975) results in an alternative discrete time version of the one-sector model of optimal stochastic growth. It suggests that diffusion process models have no monopoly, or even apparent advantages, in pursuing characterizations of the asymptotic distributions. Our work confirms the assertion that certainty estimates may be biased approximations of analogous values, although our biases are exactly opposite in sign to those of Merton's (1975) model. In our model, the linear homogeneous savings function, which results from optimizing behaviour under (rather than being imposed as in Merton (1975)), is the same as that arising in the certainty specification. Thus while our results illustrate Mirrlees' (1974, p. 48) contention that the of may not, at the aggregative level, have significantly large influence on optimal policies, the indicated biases nevertheless suggest that the introduction of does significantly alter the description of economies growing along optimal paths.