Model Of Political Leadership Research Articles

The relationship of the type of leader with the model of political leadership and the political regime

The relationship of the type of leader with the model of political leadership and the political regime

Volodymyr Zelensky: ressources et limites de la popularité (étude de cas basée sur les élections présidentielles en Ukraine, 2019)

Ukraine’s presidential election has given the electorate a new model of political leadership. Some political scientists rushed to identify him as a newly elected president of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky, as a model populist leader. ThTh e leader of the party created in the context of the presidential election, the „Servant of the People”, won over 73% of the vote. In January 2020, however, its rating dropped dramatically to over 21%. In this context, we set out to analyze the electoral and post-election rhetoric, the reasons for the depletion of popularity and trust in President Zelensky. The main factor did not allow President Zelensky to reiterate the performance of the 2019 presidential and parliamentary elections and in the 2020 local elections was the loss of popular sympathy, continued confrontations with opposition leaders, maintaining the tense situation in the Donbas region, the lack of effects of fighting initiatives. In the absence of local structures of the „Servant of the People”, the new charismatic government has not proved its effectiveness

Early Life Leadership Dimensions of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman: An Exceptional Political Leadership Model

Sheikh Mujibur Rahman was an unparallel political leader of Bangladesh who gained leadership qualities from the early days of life. He is popularly known as Bangabandhu and was a great philanthropist. Mujib was the unique political personality and the creator or father of the nation of Bangladesh. His 'Historic 7 March Speech' of 1971 now is the documentary heritage in the Memory of the World Register of UNESCO-United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. By his captivating leadership, the people of Bangladesh snatched the country's independence. Sheikh Mujibur Rahman captured the ideals of life, education and learning of the love and sympathy to the people, communal harmony, securing the right of the 'have not' people since his boyhood. These leadership traits made Sheikh Mujibur Rahman an exception character ever since his early days, and peoples are knowledgeable about his trademarked political career and venerated his artisanship in crafting Bangladesh. However, the concept of childhood leadership that Mujib belonged merely came to light. This article aims to examine the significant small events of domestic surroundings, dynastic background and family education, schooling, right-based activities, and the gradual involvement in the country's politics of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman. These fundamental elements translated into charismatic and democratic political leadership and made him a tremendous humanitarian personality. As a method, analyzing the archival resources and related published literature as books and journal articles, this study has crafted a vivid picture of an unsophisticated but the foundation of moral learning of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman from early life. The significant result of this study is that it would present an exceptional model of political leadership and fulfil the gap about the information over his early life leadership. Most importantly, the outcome will provide the leadership capability to achieve goals personally set by the Mujib through his distinguishing attributes and response to the social and environmental situation during early life that would contribute to the discourse of political leadership studies.

Globalizacja obojętności czy globalizacja solidarności?

CEL NAUKOWY: Papież Franciszek jako jeden z liderów społeczności światowej często podejmuje temat globalizacji. Artykuł przedstawia poglądy papieża o negatywnie rozumianej „globalizacji obojętności” i pozytywnie rozumianej „globalizacji solidarności” w kontekście wyzwań stojących przed naukami o polityce i administracji.
 PROBLEM I METODY BADAWCZE: Analizie poddano orędzia papieża Franciszka z okazji Światowego Dnia Pokoju z lat 2014-2019 pod kątem najważniejszych wyzwań stojących aktualnie przed społecznością światową oraz kierunków jej dalszego rozwoju. Analiza ma charakter jakościowy i koncentruje się na rekonstrukcji i syntezie merytorycznych treści badanych komunikatów zarówno w warstwie deskryptywnej, jak i normatywnej.
 PROCES WYWODU: Jednym z głównych zagrożeń jest współcześnie „globalizacja obojętności” rozumiana jako pogoń za zyskiem i zamknięcie się na potrzeby najsłabszych. Chrześcijańską odpowiedzią na nią powinna być „globalizacja solidarności”, czyli odnowa ładu społecznego opartego na wartości ogólnoludzkiego braterstwa.
 WYNIKI ANALIZY NAUKOWEJ: Papież zwraca uwagę na wiele negatywnych zjawisk powiązanych z globalizacją, jednocześnie traktując ten proces jako szansę na rozwiązanie wielu problemów społecznych. Papież daje konkretne wskazówki co do koniecznych działań. Generalny konsens społeczności międzynarodowej jednak nie wystarczy, konieczne są wielopoziomowe reformy w celu przełożenia uniwersalnych wartości ludzkich na konkretne działania w różnych częściach świata.
 WNIOSKI, INNOWACJE, REKOMENDACJE: W realizacji koncepcji globalizacji solidarności dużą rolę mogą odegrać nauki społeczne, których zadaniem jest m.in. opracowanie nowego modelu przywództwa politycznego, budowanego na ogólnoludzkich wartościach braterstwa i solidarności, odrzucającego metody walki i dominacji, a opartego na wzajemnym szacunku, zaufaniu i dialogu społecznym.

Islamic Model of Political Leadership as a Potential Way to Start Negotiations Aimed at Resolving the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

The paper reviews the issue of the creation of a fundamentally new innovative model of negotiation process focused on settling the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In the author’s opinion, political leadership factor that is typical for the Arab-Israeli world is instrumental in providing a conceptual framework for peace talks between Israel and Palestine in the context of globalization. The article focuses on the peculiarities of the Islamic model of political or, to be more precise, religious and political leadership and how it can be implemented to give a new impetus to the currently bogged down Israeli-Palestinian peace talks. The author argues that is impossible to achieve any tangible regional treaty because not all the arrangements concerning Palestine have a legitimate character from the point of view of both the Palestinians and the people of other Muslim countries in the world. Therefore, in the author’s opinion, without using such an innovative model of the negotiation process it will be principally impossible to achieve a final settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Moses as a Visionary Realist

The biblical figure of Moses is discussed as the "ideal type" of the "visionary realist" defined as a leader who combines the setting of transformational goals with a good sense of reality. Three questions are addressed: (1) Who is the visionary realist? (2) What is the nature of his vision? and (3) What are the strategies of its implementation in transformational processes? The answers to these questions are offered as the building blocks of a prescriptive model of political leadership.

Preconditions of Mayoral Leadership

Observers of city politics have often stated that political leadership—usually mayoral leadership—is a crucial ingredient in a city's ability to deal with its problems. And studies of successful leaders in urban systems have led to the formulation of a model of the “political entrepreneur” who is adept at accumulating political resources and pyramiding them to gain increased influence. Based on four years of observation of politics in Oakland, California, this study suggests that successful mayoral leadership and resource-pyramiding may be limited by governmental structure, the personality of the mayor, and the nature of the political system.In Oakland, fragmented institutional authority and the council-manager form of government have created obstacles for elected officials. A privately oriented, “nonpolitical” mayor has avoided publicity and has tended to underutilize, rather than pyramid, his resources. Finally, in an amorphous political system characterized by a lack of group and party activity, a mayor is denied both information and support. By examining the ways in which the performance of Oakland's mayor diverges from a model of political leadership, we can identify some of the factors that support or limit such leadership.